Variable effects of cardiomyoplasty on left ventricular function

"Demand" stimulation of latissimus dorsi heart wrap: experience in humans and comparison with adynamic girdling

BACKGROUND

Questionable systolic assistance and latissimus dorsi (LD) muscular degeneration as a result of continuous electrical stimulation constitute important drawbacks to dynamic cardiomyoplasty. To avoid full transformation of the LD and thereby cause better systolic assistance, a new stimulation protocol was developed. Fewer impulses per day are delivered so that the LD wrap has daily periods of rest (demand), based on a heart rate cutoff. We describe our experience of demand dynamic wrapping by discriminating between patients with active systolic assistance and those with a passive girdle effect (adynamic-girdling).

METHODS

Fourteen patients with primary dilated cardiomyopathy (13 men, 1 woman; mean age, 58.2 +/- 5.8 years; 12 sinus rhythm, 2 atrial fibrillation) underwent dynamic cardiomyoplasty between 1993 and 1996 as well as the demand protocol at different intervals. Clinical, echocardiographic, mechanographic, and cardiac invasive assessment records, as well as cardiovascular events (death and arrhythmias), were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the mechanographic measurement of speed of contraction of the heart wrap, as measured by tetanic fusion frequency analysis before starting demand stimulation: demand dynamic wrapping patients with fast LD (high tetanic fusion frequency, 7 patients), and adynamic-girdling patients with slow LD contraction times (low tetanic fusion frequency, 7 patients). It was assumed that in adynamic-girdling patients dynamic assistance was virtually absent, so the wrapping acted only as a passive constraint wall.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable for sex, age, dilated cardiomyopathy cause, New York Heart Association class, and left ventricular ejection fraction at the start of the demand protocol period. After a mean duration of follow-up of 41.4 +/- 21.1 months (range, 23 to 69 months), the demand dynamic wrapping group showed improved New York Heart Association class (1.14 +/- 0.34 versus 2.07 + 0.18; p = 0.0004), higher values of left ventricular ejection fraction (34.6 +/- 8.0 versus 26.5 +/- 3.1; p = 0.005) and LD wrap tetanic fusion frequency (38.3 +/- 5.88 versus 24.3 +/- 2.93; p = 0.002), and a better survival (85.7% versus 28.6%; p = 0.037) than the adynamic-girdling group.

CONCLUSIONS

Demand dynamic wrapping offers good results in terms of fewer cardiovascular events and greater survival. When compared with the passive constraint effect of LD muscle, demand dynamic wrapping proved to be more effective.

Vascular delay and intermittent stimulation: keys to successful latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to obtain physiologically significant increases in peak left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure and stroke volume with latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) stimulation in cardiomyoplasty (CMP). We hypothesized that preserving LDM integrity by vascular delay and intermittent stimulation would significantly increase LDM cardiac assistance.

METHODS

In 4 control dogs and 12 dogs that had undergone a vascular delay (VD) procedure, LV dysfunction was induced by intracoronary microsphere injections. Cardiomyoplasty surgery was performed 14 days later, followed by progressive LDM conditioning. In the control dogs and in 6 of the VD dogs, the LDM was stimulated 24 hours per day (VD plus constant stimulation [CS]). In the other 6 VD dogs, LDMs were stimulated on a daily schedule of 10 hours on and 14 hours off (VD plus interrupted stimulation [IS]). Latissimus dorsi muscle stimulated beats were compared with nonstimulated beats 9 weeks later.

RESULTS

In the control dogs, LDM stimulation had minimal effects. In VD + CS and VD + IS, LDM stimulation increased peak LV pressure, stroke volume, stroke work, and stroke power (p < 0.05). However, these changes were greater in the VD + IS group, in which LDM stimulation increased peak aortic pressure by 17.6 +/- 1.7 mm Hg, peak LV pressure by 19.7 +/- 1.1 mm Hg, peak positive LV dp/dt by 398 +/- 144 mm Hg per second, stroke volume by 5.1 +/- 0.7 mL, stroke work by 10.9 +/- 0.9 gm.m, and stroke power by 122.7 +/- 11.6 gm.m per second (p < 0.05 compared with VD + CS). Quantitative morphometric analysis showed minimal LDM degeneration in the VD + IS group (7.5% +/- 1.1%), and VD + CS group (10.5% +/- 4.5%) compared with the control group (29.5% +/- 4.5%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

VD and IS considerably increased the LV assistance with LDM stimulation. Further studies of this combined approach to CMP should be planned.

Effects of electrical stimulation postcardiomyoplasty in a model of chronic heart failure: hemodynamic results after daily 12-hour cessation versus a nonstop regimen

The hemodynamic effects of cardiomyoplasty (CMP) have been investigated in many centers, but the question of whether it is necessary to stimulate the latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) 24 hours a day has not been answered. The main goal of our investigation was to determine whether hemodynamic results after CMP were impaired when continuous electrical stimulation (ES) was off for 12 hours a day. A model of chronic heart failure was created in 12 sheep by performing an arteriovenous anastamosis and administering doxorubicin. Two weeks after the anastomosis, CMP was performed in eight sheep (experimental series); ES training was begun at 2 weeks after CMP. After completion of the initial ES conditioning (8 weeks after CMP), one group of sheep continued to receive ES 24 hours daily. Another group of sheep had only 12 hours of ES daily. Hemodynamic parameters were investigated 2 weeks later with the stimulator turned on and then off. With doxorubicin administration, arteriovenous anastamosis created a stable model of biventricular heart failure (right atrial pressure 20 +/- 3 mmHg vs 6 +/- 2 mmHg at baseline; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 18 +/- 3 mmHg vs 9 +/- 2 mmHg; left ventricular end-diastolic area 15.2 +/- 1.2 cm2 vs 6.4 +/- 0.7 cm2; left ventricular ejection fraction 0.38 +/- 0.6 vs 0.65 +/- 0.7). Cardiomyoplasty improved hemodynamic status in all eight experimental sheep. However, when the investigation was performed with the stimulator off, this improvement was statistically insignificant. With stimulation on, there was decreased right atrial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and increased left ventricular ejection fraction. With the stimulator turned off for 12 hours daily, hemodynamic measurements did not differ from data with continuous ES for 24 hours daily. Because hemodynamic results do not seem to be impaired, we recommend daily, periodic cessation of stimulation to prevent damage to the LDM after CMP.