Zonisamide: Pharmacology and Clinical Efficacy in Epilepsy

Zonisamide: A Comprehensive, Updated Review for the Clinician

Purpose of Review

Zonisamide (ZNS) was first approved in the United States in 2000 for the adjunctive treatment of patients aged 16 years or older with partial (focal) seizures. Although ZNS has been proven to treat multiple seizure types, it has been largely underutilized in US clinical practice.

Recent Findings

Published literature demonstrated that antiseizure medications (ASMs) acting on Na+ and Ca2+ channels may add beneficial effects in many seizure types by reducing seizure frequency and leading to overall improvements. In addition, effects of ZNS may lead to clinical improvements in Parkinson disease, alcohol and sleep disorders, pain, and migraine. ZNS is available in multiple formulations and is a safe and effective, broad spectrum ASM.

Summary

The purpose of this review was to provide an update to what is known about the efficacy of ZNS and where it shows benefits in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and other CNS disorders through its many unique mechanisms of action.

Five-Membered Heterocyclic Sulfonamides as Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

The development of heterocyclic derivatives has progressed considerably over the past decades, and many new carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) fall into this field. In particular, five-membered heterocyclic sulfonamides have been generally shown to be more effective inhibitors compared to six-membered rings ones. Despite the importance of oxygen and nitrogen five-membered heterocyclic aromatic rings in medicinal chemistry, the installation of sulfonamide moiety on such heterocycles has not received much attention. On the other hand, 1,3,4-thiadiazole/thiadiazoline ring-bearing sulfonamides are the scaffolds which have been widely used in a variety of pharmaceutically important CAIs such as acetazolamide, metazolamide and their many derivatives obtained by using the tail approach. Here, we reviewed the field focusing on the diverse biological activities of these CAIs, such as antiglaucoma, antiepileptic, antitumor and antiinfective properties. This review highlights developments involving five-membered heterocyclic sulfonamides over the last years, with a focus on their pharmacological/clinical applications.

Prospects for new drugs to treat binge-eating disorder: Insights from psychopathology and neuropharmacology

BACKGROUND

Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a common psychiatric condition with adverse psychological and metabolic consequences. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is the only approved BED drug treatment. New drugs to treat BED are urgently needed.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of published psychopathological, pharmacological and clinical findings.

RESULTS

The evidence supports the hypothesis that BED is an impulse control disorder with similarities to ADHD, including responsiveness to catecholaminergic drugs, for example LDX and dasotraline. The target product profile (TPP) of the ideal BED drug combines treating the psychopathological drivers of the disorder with an independent weight-loss effect. Drugs with proven efficacy in BED have a common pharmacology; they potentiate central noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission. Because of the overlap between pharmacotherapy in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and BED, drug-candidates from diverse pharmacological classes, which have already failed in ADHD would also be predicted to fail if tested in BED. The failure in BED trials of drugs with diverse pharmacological mechanisms indicates many possible avenues for drug discovery can probably be discounted.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The efficacy of drugs for BED is dependent on reducing its core psychopathologies of impulsivity, compulsivity and perseveration and by increasing cognitive control of eating. (2) The analysis revealed a large number of pharmacological mechanisms are unlikely to be productive in the search for effective new BED drugs. (3) The most promising areas for new treatments for BED are drugs, which augment noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission and/or those which are effective in ADHD.

What pharmacological interventions are effective in binge-eating disorder? Insights from a critical evaluation of the evidence from clinical trials

Binge-eating disorder (BED) is the commonest eating disorder and an important causal factor in obesity. Lisdexamfetamine is the only approved pharmacological treatment. Many drugs have been clinically evaluated and several were described as potentially promising treatments. A comprehensive reassessment of the evidence from these clinical trials has been performed. The questions to be answered were: (1) Does the evidence support claims of efficacy? (2) What pharmacological mechanisms show promise for developing new BED drugs? (3) What are the clinical implications for treating BED? PubMed and internal database searches identified every available published drug trial in BED. The trials and their results were summarised and reviewed to re-evaluate the evidence. Factors taken into consideration included psychiatric diagnosis, primary endpoint, secondary outcome measures, trial size, blinding and controls, drop-out rates, placebo response rates and weight-loss. Drugs were classified according to their pharmacology and therapeutic indication to determine which mechanisms were effective and to provide insights into the psychopathology of BED. For most drugs, robust evidence of efficacy in BED is insubstantial or absent. Some catecholaminergic drugs developed for ADHD are also effective in BED; other pharmacological mechanisms are weakly efficacious at best. Reducing BED severity has little impact on weight. Conversely, weight-loss from anti-obesity therapy is ineffective in ameliorating the psychopathological drivers of BED. (1) BED is a psychiatric not a metabolic disorder. (2) Weight-loss drugs are generally ineffective in BED. (3) Efficacy in BED is restricted to powerful catecholaminergic drugs. (4) Drugs acting via noradrenaline, 5-HT, GABA, carbonic anhydrase inhibition, opioid receptors and various ion channels are generally minimally effective at best. (5) Efficacy in BED is dependent on treating its core psychopathology; reducing impulsivity and compulsivity and increasing cognitive restraint over eating. (6) Obese subjects with BED may benefit from separate treatments for these two disorders.

Zonisamide in Parkinson's disease: a current update

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease due to the depletion of the neurotransmitter dopamine in basal ganglia. There is a scarcity of available therapies for motor and non-motor symptoms of PD. Zonisamide (ZNS) may be one such potential candidate to alleviate PD symptoms. It was serendipitously found to be useful for PD in a patient with both epilepsy and PD. Since then, there have been many clinical trials, case series, observational studies, and case reports published supporting the efficacy of ZNS in PD. This review focuses on the efficacy and usefulness of ZNS in various motor and non-motor symptoms of PD. A predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for the search protocol and databases searched were PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and clinicaltrials.gov. Most of the randomized clinical trials used UPDRS III as the primary efficacy point and showed positive results favouring ZNS. This review shows that there is evidence of the efficacy of ZNS in motor symptoms as an adjunctive therapy to levodopa, but for non-motor symptoms, the evidence is lacking and needs further investigation.

Anticonvulsant Effects of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: The Enigmatic Link Between Carbonic Anhydrases and Electrical Activity of the Brain

Acetazolamide (ACZ), a sulfonamide carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor, was first introduced into medical use as a diuretic in the1950s. Shortly after its introduction, its antiglaucoma and anticonvulsant properties came to light. Subsequently, studies of ACZ have explored a plethora of neurophysiological functions of CAs in the CNS. In addition, topiramate (TPM) and zonisamide (ZNS), which were developed as antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the1990s, were found to have the ability to inhibit CAs. How CA inhibition prevents seizures is elusive. CA expression and activity are extensively detected in neurons, the choroid plexus, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. TPM and ZNS appear to produce multimodal actions in the CNS as well as CA inhibition unlike ACZ. Nonetheless, CA inhibitors share some common denominators. They do not only affect the fine equilibrium among CO₂, H⁺ and HCO₃^- in the extraneuronal and intraneuronal milieu, but also modulate the activity of ligand gated ion channels at the neuronal level such as GABA-A signaling through inhibiting CA-replenished HCO₃^- efflux. In addition, there are studies reporting their ability to alter Ca²⁺ kinetics through modulation of ligand gated Ca²⁺ channels, voltage gated Ca²⁺ channels (VGCC) or Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release channels (CICRC). The present study will review the involvement of CAs in the formation of epileptogenesis, and likely mechanisms by which CA inhibitors suppress the electrical activity of the brain. The common properties of CA inhibitors provide some clues for a possible link among metabolism, CAs, Ca²⁺ and GABA signaling.

The Effect of Anti-seizure Medications on the Propagation of Epileptic Activity: A Review

The propagation of epileptiform events is a highly interesting phenomenon from the pathophysiological point of view, as it involves several mechanisms of recruitment of neural networks. Extensive in vivo and in vitro research has been performed, suggesting that multiple networks as well as cellular candidate mechanisms govern this process, including the co-existence of wave propagation, coupled oscillator dynamics, and more. The clinical importance of seizure propagation stems mainly from the fact that the epileptic manifestations cannot be attributed solely to the activity in the seizure focus itself, but rather to the propagation of epileptic activity to other brain structures. Propagation, especially when causing secondary generalizations, poses a risk to patients due to recurrent falls, traumatic injuries, and poor neurological outcome. Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) affect propagation in diverse ways and with different potencies. Importantly, for drug-resistant patients, targeting seizure propagation may improve the quality of life even without a major reduction in simple focal events. Motivated by the extensive impact of this phenomenon, we sought to review the literature regarding the propagation of epileptic activity and specifically the effect of commonly used ASMs on it. Based on this body of knowledge, we propose a novel classification of ASMs into three main categories: major, minor, and intermediate efficacy in reducing the propagation of epileptiform activity.

Pharmacokinetics of zonisamide after oral single dosing and multiple-dose escalation administration in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus)

Background

There are few effective drugs for treatment of seizures in avian species.

Objectives

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of zonisamide in chickens.

Methods

Phase 1: chickens (n = 4) received a single oral dose of zonisamide at 20 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected intermittently for 36 hr after dosing. Phase 2: chickens (n = 8) received zonisamide in a dose escalation protocol (20, 30, 60 and 80 mg/kg orally every 12 hr). The dose was increased weekly, and peak and trough blood samples were collected on Days 1, 3, and 7 each week. Two birds were randomly euthanized at the end of each week. Plasma zonisamide concentrations were analysed using a commercial immunoassay. Drug concentration vs. time data were subjected to non‐compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.

Results

For Phase 1, peak plasma zonisamide (C_max) was 15 ± 3 µg/ml at 2 ± 1 hr (T_max). The disappearance half‐life was 6.5 ± 1 hr. Mean plasma concentrations remained within the (human) therapeutic range (10–40 µg/ml) for 6 hr. For Phase 2 of the study, plasma concentrations of zonisamide remained within or close to the recommended mammalian therapeutic range for birds in the 20 and 30 mg/kg dose. Area under the curve (AUC) and C_max were dose dependent. Two birds developed immune‐mediated haemolytic anaemia.

Conclusions

Zonisamide appears to be a viable drug for use in chickens at a dose of 20 mg/kg orally every 12 hr.

Pharmacological management of dementia with Lewy bodies with a focus on zonisamide for treating parkinsonism

INTRODUCTION

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) has no approved symptomatic or disease-modifying treatments in the US and Europe, despite being the second most common cause of neurodegenerative dementia.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors briefly review the DLB drug development pipeline, providing a summary of the current pharmacological intervention studies. They then focus on the anticonvulsant zonisamide, a benzisoxazole derivative with a sulfonamide group and look at its value for treating parkinsonism in DLB.

EXPERT OPINION

Several new compounds are being tested in DLB, the most innovative being those aimed at decreasing brain accumulation of α-synuclein. Unfortunately, new drug testing is challenging in terms of consistent diagnostic criteria and lack of reliable biomarkers. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are well-designed, with enough power to detect significant drug effects. Levodopa monotherapy can treat the parkinsonism in DLB, but it can cause agitation or visual hallucination worsening. Two Phase II/III RCTs of DLB patients recently reported a statistically significant improvement in motor function in those receiving zonisamide as an adjunctive treatment to levodopa. New biomarker strategies and validated outcome measures for DLB or prodromal DLB may enhance clinical trial design for the development of specific disease-modifying treatments.

Hepatocellular necrosis with prominent regenerative reactions in a zonisamide administrated dog

A 16 years old neutered male Miniature Dachshund with 1-year history of repetitive administration of zonisamide for treatment of epileptic seizure was presented for vomiting, anorexia and diarrhea. Serum biochemistry showed a markedly elevated ALP level. The dog died 6 days after the presentation and a necropsy was performed. Histopathologically, random, focal to extensive necrosis, formation of regenerative hepatocellular nodules surrounded by fibrous septa and proliferation of bile ducts were seen in the liver. From these findings, the hepatic lesion was diagnosed as hepatocellular necrosis with prominent regenerative reactions due to the chronic persistent liver injury. Hepatic lesions were considered to be induced by zonisamide, based on the history of continuous administration, and clinical and histopathological findings.

Zonisamide as a treatment for partial epileptic seizures: a systematic review

Although the majority of people with epilepsy have a good prognosis and their seizures can be well controlled with pharmacotherapy, up to one-third of patients can develop drug-resistant epilepsy, especially those patients with partial seizures. This unmet need has driven considerable efforts over the last few decades aimed at developing and testing newer antiepileptic agents to improve seizure control. One of the most promising antiepileptic drugs of the new generation is zonisamide, a benzisoxazole derivative chemically unrelated to other anticonvulsant agents. In this article, the authors present the results of a systematic literature review summarizing the current evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide for the treatment of partial seizures. Of particular interest within this updated review are the recent data on the use of zonisamide as monotherapy, as they might open new therapeutic avenues.

Zonisamide: newer antiepileptic agent with multiple mechanisms of action

Zonisamide (Zonegran, Eisai, Inc.) is a broad spectrum antiepileptic drug indicated for use as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial seizures. Zonisamide has multiple mechanisms of action, which may explain widespread reports of its utility in focal epilepsy and generalized epilepsy, and for nonseizure disorders such as headache and neuropathic pain. Zonisamide has been available in Japan since 1989 and became available in the USA in 2002. The rights to this drug in North America and Europe were recently acquired by Eisai Co. A review of the chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, potential mechanisms of action, efficacy in seizure and nonseizure disorders, and tolerability was therefore thought to be timely.

A prospective audit of adjunctive zonisamide in an everyday clinical setting

This audit examined outcomes for 203 patients prescribed zonisamide (ZNS) for various uncontrolled seizure types at a specialist outpatient service. Forty-two (20.7%) patients achieved 6 months of seizure freedom, and an additional 37 (18.2%) had a 50% seizure reduction for 6 months on a stable ZNS dose. Seizure freedom was more likely in patients with primary generalized (24/61, 39%) than in those with partial-onset (18/141, 12.7%) seizures (P<0.001). Eight patients (5 seizure free) were maintained on ZNS monotherapy. More patients became seizure free with ZNS as monotherapy or first add-on, compared with those in whom ZNS was the second, third, or fourth adjunctive drug (P=0.001). Seizure freedom was less likely in patients treated with hepatic enzyme-inducing agents (13/113, 11.5%) than in those receiving noninducing AEDs (24/82, 29.3%) (P=0.002). ZNS was discontinued in 72 (35.5%) patients largely because of side effects (n=58, 28.6%). Commonest complaints leading to withdrawal were sedation (n=14), nausea and vomiting (n=13), neuropsychiatric symptoms (n=12), rash (n=6), and weight loss (n=6). Around 80% of patients who became seizure free on ZNS or had the drug withdrawn did so on a dose 200mg. ZNS is an effective broad-spectrum AED that can also produce a range of dose-dependent and idiosyncratic side effects.

Long-term cognitive and mood effects of zonisamide monotherapy in epilepsy patients

This study was a prospective, randomized, open-label investigation of the long-term effects of zonisamide (ZNS) monotherapy on cognition and mood of patients with epilepsy. Forty-three patients with epilepsy received ZNS, with final dose groups of 100, 200, 300, and 400mg/day. Cognitive and mood tests were done twice, at baseline and 1 year after starting medication. Nine patients were withdrawn prior to their follow-up tests. Three patients (33%) dropped out during the titration period because of cognitive and mood problems. Thirty-four patients completed follow-up neuropsychological tests. After 1 year of treatment, 16 patients (47%) complained of cognitive deficits. Only 5 patients (15%) experienced mood changes. Although ZNS decreased seizure frequency and EEG abnormalities and did not elicit significant mood changes, it had negative effects on several cognitive tests. Worse performance on delayed word recall, Trail Making Test Part B, and verbal fluency was related to dose. In conclusion, ZNS has adverse effects on cognition even after 1 year of treatment.

Long-term efficacy and safety of zonisamide monotherapy in epilepsy patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Zonisamide (ZNS) is a useful antiepileptic drug with a broad therapeutic spectrum. However, there is limited information on the long-term use of ZNS as a monotherapy. This study investigated the long-term effects of ZNS as a monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of epilepsy patients treated with ZNS monotherapy at our clinic. We identified outcomes for patients treated with ZNS monotherapy for a minimum of 6 months. Efficacy was quantified as the percentage change in seizure frequency, and safety was assessed by the frequency and types of adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty patients who received ZNS for a minimum of 6 months were included. The mean duration of treatment was 19.8 months (range, 6-37 months), and the mean ZNS dosage was 255 mg/day (range, 100-500 mg/day). Twenty-seven patients (45%) were seizure-free, and an additional 20 patients (33%) had above 50% seizure frequency reduction at the last follow-up visit. Partial seizures with or without secondary generalization and generalized seizures were well controlled by ZNS, whereas complex partial seizures were not. Forty-eight patients (80%) reported mild-to-moderate adverse events, including memory loss (35%), attention deficit (27%), and weight loss (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ZNS monotherapy is effective at treating a broad spectrum of seizure disorders, except complex partial seizures. However, a specific adverse event, such as cognitive impairment, is common and long-lasting.

Erratum to “Safety of zonisamide therapy: Prospective follow-up survey”

Zonisamide safety was evaluated based on a postmarketing surveillance study of patients treated for 1-3 years. Nine hundred twenty-eight children and 584 adult (ages 1 month to 79 years), including 372 newly-diagnosed patients, received zonisamide for partial and generalized epilepsies. Of the intractable patients, 1088 received zonisamide in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (AED), and 52 successfully transitioned to zonisamide monotherapy. A total of 1089 adverse events occurred in 476 (31.5%) of 1512 patients. Incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower among patients receiving zonisamide monotherapy than in those receiving polytherapy: 21% (18.9% of children, 29.4% of adults) versus 35.6% (30.4% of children, 41.7% of adults), respectively. The total incidence of adverse effects was lower for children (26.2%) than for adults (39.9%). Most common adverse events included mental/psychiatric symptoms (19.4%), gastrointestinal symptoms (8.7%), and neurological symptoms (6.5%). Effects that seemed unique to zonisamide were impairment of mental function, motivation or volition, and hipohidrosis. Urinary calculi were detected in only two patients (0.13%). Teratogenicity was evaluated in six patients. Two patients on zonisamide monotherapy and three on polytherapy delivered normal children. One of four patients on polytherapy conceived a fetus with a skull defect with cerebral and cerebellar dysgenesis, namely anencephaly.

The Supraspinally Mediated Analgesic Effects of Zonisamide in Mice After Peripheral Nerve Injury Are Independent of the Descending Monoaminergic System

We have previously demonstrated that the antiepileptic drug zonisamide supraspinally generates analgesic effects on thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity in mice after peripheral nerve injury. To further establish the neurochemical basis for the supraspinally mediated analgesic action of zonisamide, we measured spinal noradrenaline (NA), 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyleneglycol (MHPG), serotonin (5-HT), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), and dopamine (DA) contents using HPLC with electrochemical detection in a murine neuropathic pain model that was prepared by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve (Seltzer model). Intraperitoneally or intracerebroventricularly administered zonisamide (50 mg/kg, i.p. and 30 mug, i.c.v., respectively), which almost completely reduced mechanical hypersensitivity, did not elicit any changes in spinal NA, MHPG, 5-HT, 5-HIAA, and DA contents. Moreover, the effectiveness of i.p. or i.c.v. administered zonisamide at reducing thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity was not influenced by intrathecally administered yohimbine (3 mug), an alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist. Thus, it appears that the supraspinally mediated analgesic effects of zonisamide are independent of the descending monoaminergic pain inhibitory system.

Zonisamide as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures

Zonisamide (Zonegran) has been used extensively worldwide (>2 million patient-years experience) for the effective treatment of a broad range of epilepsy indications. Four randomised, placebo-controlled trials (duration <or=6 months) in the United States and Europe (848 patients in total) have shown doses of zonisamide >or=300 mg/day to be efficacious in treating refractory partial seizures in adults. In a pivotal European study, zonisamide 500 mg/day was significantly superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of complex partial seizures (-51% versus -16%), all partial seizures and all seizures, with dose-dependent benefit provided over a 100-500 mg/day dose range. Supporting trials have confirmed significant increases in reduction in median seizure frequency (up to 41%) and responder rates (35-42%) compared with placebo following zonisamide 400-600 mg/day, enabling 20-27% of patients to attain >or=75% reduction in seizure frequency. Pooled data from all four placebo-controlled trials demonstrate an excellent tolerability and safety profile; adverse events are generally of mild-moderate severity with few leading to discontinuation, and incidence of serious adverse events is comparable to placebo. These data support the use of zonisamide in combination with commonly used antiepileptic drugs to provide efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures.

Effect of antiepileptic drug monotherapy on urinary pH in children and young adults

OBJECTS

Since alkaline urine is a risk factor for urolithiasis, the relationship between antiepileptic drugs and urinary pH was retrospectively studied in epilepsy patients treated with antiepileptic drug monotherapy for more than 1 month.

METHODS

A total of 913 urinary samples from antiepileptic drug-treated patients were compared with 780 age-matched control samples, and with 112 samples from epilepsy patients who had not been treated with antiepileptic drugs. The antiepileptic drugs administered were carbamazepine, valproate, phenobarbital, zonisamide, sulthiame, and phenytoin.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of the acid urine in the valproate-treated patients was lower than that in controls. The proportion of the alkaline urine in the valproate-treated patients was higher than that in controls. This effect was independent of age, sex, and the serum valproate concentration. There was no significant difference in urinary pH among the epilepsy patients treated with other antiepileptic drugs, the epilepsy patients who had not been treated with antiepileptic drugs, and the controls.

Centrally mediated antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of zonisamide following partial nerve injury in the mouse

Some antiepileptic drugs are used clinically to relieve neuropathic pain. We have evaluated the effects and investigated the possible mechanisms of action of zonisamide, an antiepileptic drug, on thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in a murine chronic pain model that was prepared by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve. Subcutaneously administered zonisamide (10 and 30 mg/kg) produced antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects in a dose-dependent manner; these effects were manifested by elevation of the withdrawal threshold in response to a thermal (plantar test) or mechanical (von Frey) stimulus, respectively. Similar analgesic effects were obtained in both the plantar and von Frey tests when zonisamide was injected either intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v., 10 and 30 microg) or intrathecally (i.t., 10 and 30 microg). It is thought that this elevation of the thermal and mechanical withdrawal thresholds after local injection of zonisamide is not generated secondarily via impaired motor activity, since zonisamide (30 microg, i.c.v. or i.t.) did not affect locomotor activity, as assessed in sciatic-nerve-ligated mice. Moreover, the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME, when injected either i.c.v. or i.t., potentiated the analgesic effects of zonisamide. In contrast, neither i.c.v. nor i.t. zonisamide produced antinociceptive effects against acute thermal and mechanical nociception in non-ligated mice. Together, following peripheral nerve injury, it appears that zonisamide produces centrally mediated antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects partly via the blockade of nitric oxide synthesis.

Zonisamide: a review of its use in the management of partial seizures in epilepsy

Zonisamide (Zonegran, Excegran) is a new-generation, broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) currently approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of medically refractory partial seizures in adults in the US and as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy in the control of partial and generalised seizures in adults and children in Japan and Korea. Either as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy, zonisamide effectively reduces the frequency of partial seizures, with or without secondary generalisation to tonic-clonic seizures, in adults and children with epilepsy. The drug is generally well tolerated and, additionally, has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile permitting once- or twice-daily administration. Direct head-to-head comparisons with other AEDs would be beneficial in fully defining the place of zonisamide in therapy. In the meantime, adjunctive therapy or monotherapy with zonisamide is a convenient, useful option for the management of partial seizures, including those refractory to other AEDs.

Zonisamide: Physician and patient experiences

This study evaluates information regarding physician and patient experiences with zonisamide obtained from the early access and support for epilepsy (EASE) program. Both physicians and patients completed initiation questionnaires regarding seizure history and antiepileptic drug (AED) use. Physicians were advised to initiate zonisamide at 100 mg/day and titrate either to a clinical response or a maximum dosage of 600 mg/day. After > or = 2 months of zonisamide therapy, physicians and patients were asked to complete follow-up questionnaires that included questions regarding seizure frequency, seizure severity, and quality of life. Initiation questionnaires and follow-up questionnaires were submitted by 80 physicians for 163 patients. According to these data, seizure control, functional status, and other symptoms of epilepsy were improved in 57.4% (93/162), 37.1% (59/159), and 30.6% (48/157) of patients, respectively. Physicians intended to continue zonisamide therapy in 77.4% (123/159) of patients. Ninety-six patients submitted both initiation and follow-up questionnaires. Seizure control, seizure severity, and quality of life were improved in 53.6% (45/84), 58.8% (50/85), and 62.1% (54/87) of patients, respectively. These patients, most of whom were refractory to other AEDs, generally had positive experiences with zonisamide.

Review of zonisamide development in Japan

Zonisamide is a benzisoxazole-based compound first synthesized in the early 1970s by the research laboratories of Dainippon Pharmaceutical Company in Osaka, Japan. Identified as an anticonvulsant during exploratory research, zonisamide has since been characterized as having broad-spectrum antiepilepsy and neuroprotective effects. Early clinical studies in Japan demonstrated that zonisamide has a long elimination half-life and is well tolerated; Phase II and III clinical trials established the drug's efficacy and safety for the treatment of partial and generalized seizures. In 1989, zonisamide was approved and marketed in Japan under the trade name of Excegran. Data from postmarketing surveillance studies and clinical observations over 10 years of use have continued to support zonisamide's efficacy and safety, identified its usefulness as monotherapy, and characterized its effectiveness for various seizure types and epilepsy syndromes.

Safety of zonisamide therapy: prospective follow-up survey

Zonisamide safety was evaluated based on a postmarketing surveillance study of patients treated for 1-3 years. Nine hundred twenty-eight children and 584 adults (ages 1 month to 79 years), including 372 newly-diagnosed patients, received zonisamide for partial and generalized epilepsies. Of the intractable patients, 1008 received zonisamide in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (AED), and 52 successfully transitioned to zonisamide monotherapy. A total of 1089 adverse events occurred in 476 (31.5%) of 1512 patients. Incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower among patients receiving zonisamide monotherapy than in those receiving polytherapy: 21% (18.9% of children, 29.4% of adults) versus 35.6% (30.4% of children, 41.7% of adults), respectively. The total incidence of adverse effects was lower for children (26.2%) than for adults (39.9%). Most common adverse events included mental/psychiatric symptoms (19.4%), gastrointestinal symptoms (8.7%), and neurological symptoms (5.8%). Effects that seemed unique to zonisamide were impairment of mental function, motivation or volition, and hypohidrosis. Urinary calculi were detected in only two patients (0.13%). Teratogenicity was evaluated in six patients. Two patients on zonisamide monotherapy and three on polytherapy delivered normal children. One of four patients on polytherapy conceived a fetus with a skull defect with cerebral and cerebellar dysgenesis.

Postoperative seizures: epidemiology, pathology, and prophylaxis

The risk of epileptic seizures after craniotomy is extremely important but the incidence of postoperative epilepsy varies greatly, depending on the patient's conditions such as primary diseases, severity of surgical insult, and pre-existing epilepsy. Animal studies suggest that neurosurgical insults lead to seizures by two different mechanisms: One mechanism is mediated by free radical generation and the other by impaired ion balance across the cell membrane caused by ischemia or hypoxia. Conventional antiepileptic agents such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and valproic acid are promising for the prevention of early seizures, but the effect in preventing postoperative epilepsy is still controversial. Studies on the prophylactic effect of newer antiepileptic agents in craniotomized patients were very limited. Zonisamide, an antiepileptic agent with antiepileptogenic, free radical scavenging and neuroprotective actions in experimental animals, showed promising effects against postoperative epilepsy in a randomized double blind controlled trial. Prophylactic treatment for craniotomized patients significantly prevented the development of partial seizures during the follow-up period. Most recent studies have not supported the prophylactic use of antiepileptic agents in craniotomized patients, but further studies are required.

The long-term effects of antiepileptic drugs on the visual system in rats: electrophysiological and histopathological studies

OBJECTIVE

We quantified the long-term effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the visual system of rats using electroretinograms (ERGs) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs).

METHODS

Twenty adult Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups (n=5). Each animal was treated by monotherapy of phenytoin (PHT), valproic acid (VPA), zonisamide (ZNS) or physiological saline as control. The AEDs were injected intraperitoneally daily for 180 days. ERGs and VEPs were recorded before the medication and on Days 30 and 180.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in the 4 groups on Day 30. On Day 180, the amplitudes of a- and b-waves of dark-adapted (DA) ERGs were reduced in the PHT group compared with those of the control group. In the VPA group, the amplitudes of the DA ERG a- and b-waves, light-adapted ERG b-wave and the DA VEP were reduced. No significant changes were observed in the ZNS group. There were no histopathological changes of the retina and visual cortex in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that neurons along the visual pathways have different sensitivity to each AED. This may result from the differential pharmacological actions of each AED on visual neurons.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings suggest that epileptic patients on long-term use of AEDs might have subclinical influences to the visual systems.

Zonisamide has beneficial effects on Parkinson's disease patients

Zonisamide (ZNS) is a generally well tolerated anticonvulsant that has beneficial effects on Parkinson's disease (PD). ZNS (300 mg/day) given to a patient with PD who incidentally had convulsive attacks, ameliorated the attacks and, surprisingly, his parkinsonian symptoms. We, therefore, carried out an open trial of ZNS on nine patients with PD. Patients were given 50-200 mg/day ZNS in addition to their anti-PD drugs. Seven clearly showed lessening of symptoms, especially wearing-off. We speculate that long lasting activation of dopamine synthesis by ZNS ameliorates parkinsonian symptoms, in particular wearing-off.

Review of treatment options for refractory epilepsy: new medications and vagal nerve stimulation

PURPOSE

the choices available for patients whose partial seizures are poorly controlled include seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) as add-on therapy. Comparisons are needed to help physicians and patients select among the options for treatment.

METHODS

we compared efficacy and adverse events of new treatments from controlled clinical trials of patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Response rates (> or =50% decrease in partial seizures) at doses recommended in product labeling for adjunct therapy were tabulated for overall success (placebo response rate subtracted from AED response rate). Adverse events listed in product labeling were tabulated as complaint rates (placebo events subtracted from AED events). VNS trials used low dose stimulation as a pseudo-placebo.

RESULTS

overall success rates fell into two general groups with ranges of 12-20% for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), zonisamide and 27-29% for levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate (TPM). Summary Complaint Scores also fell into two general groups with ranges of -27 to -82 for GBP, levetiracetam, TGB, zonisamide and -113 to -205 for LTG, oxcarbazepine and TPM. VNS scores were in the lower or higher success and summary complaint categories depending on whether scores from the pseudo-placebo group were subtracted from the high dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

these data allow comparisons among AEDs and VNS using similar data from standard types of clinical trials.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Fifth Eilat Conference (EILAT V)

The Fifth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) took place at the Dan Hotel, Eilat, Israel, 25-29 June 2000. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 20 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included recognition of unexpected adverse effects, new indications of AEDs, and patient-tailored AED therapy. According to tradition, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well to updates on AEDs that have been marketed in recent years. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in preclinical and clinical development, including AWD 131-138, DP-valproate, harkoseride, LY300164, NPS 1776, NW 1015, pregabalin, remacemide, retigabine, rufinamide and valrocemide. The potential value of an innovative strategy, porcine embryonic GABAergic cell transplants, is also discussed. Finally, updates on felbamate, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are presented.

Side effect profiles and behavioral consequences of antiepileptic medications

In 1991, Dodrill carefully reviewed the behavioral effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and concluded: "The area of behavioral effects of antiepileptic drugs is poorly defined, lacks recognized and validated methods of assessment, and has suffered from a number of methodological limitations, especially including the use of experimental designs which have led to the contamination of drug effects and subject effects" (1). He further observed that the best controlled study showed that the behavioral effects of AEDs were quite limited; the benzodiazepines had the most consistently favorable effect, but were of limited utility in epilepsy, because they were not typically administered on a long-term basis; carbamazepine was associated with a favorable behavior change, but this change was seen most consistently in nonepileptic subjects; relatively few studies of valproic acid had been conducted; phenytoin was not associated with either a consistently positive or consistently negative change; and the barbiturates were clearly associated with the most negative behavior change. Since Dodrill's review, eight new AEDs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the United States, thereby dramatically increasing the therapeutic options for patients with epilepsy. These new drugs also increase the complexity of choosing the ideal drug for any given patient. Certainly a critical component of the decision to initiate or continue a specific treatment is the side effect profile of the medication. In clinical practice, behavioral and cognitive side effects of the older AEDs are significant concerns. This paper reviews the clinically important behavioral and cognitive side effects of the more commonly used, established AEDs as well as the newer AEDs within the limits of currently available published peer-reviewed literature and clinical experience. Particular emphasis is given to subpopulations at risk.