Pharmacology of Azimilide Dihydrochloride (NE-10064), A Class III Antiarrhythmic Agent

New Strategies for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the clinical practice. It significantly contributes to the morbidity and mortality of the elderly population. Over the past 25-30 years intense effort in basic research has advanced the understanding of the relationship between the pathophysiology of AF and atrial remodelling. Nowadays it is clear that the various forms of atrial remodelling (electrical, contractile and structural) play crucial role in initiating and maintaining the persistent and permanent types of AF. Unlike in ventricular fibrillation, in AF rapid ectopic firing originating from pulmonary veins and re-entry mechanism may induce and maintain (due to atrial remodelling) this complex cardiac arrhythmia. The present review presents and discusses in detail the latest knowledge on the role of remodelling in AF. Special attention is paid to novel concepts and pharmacological targets presumably relevant to the drug treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Antiarrhythmic and Proarrhythmic Properties of QT-Prolonging Antianginal Drugs

In recent years there has been a major reorientation of drug therapy for cardiac arrhythmias, its changing role, and above all, a radical change in the class of arrhythmia drugs because of their impact on mortality. The decline in the use of sodium-channel blockers has led to an expanding use of β-blockers and simple or complex class III agents for controlling cardiac arrhythmias. Success with these agents in the context of their side effects has spurred the development of compounds with simpler ion-channel blocking properties that have less complex adverse reactions. The resulting so-called pure class III agents, such as dofetilide or ibutilide, were found to have antifibrillatory effects in atrial fibrillation and flutter and in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Such agents are effective and have diversity, but they have come into therapeutics with a price: the sometimes-fatal torsades de pointes. The drug amiodarone, a complex compound that was synthesized as an antianginal agent, has been an exception in this regard. Its therapeutic use is associated with a negligibly low incidence of torsades de pointes, even though the drug produces significant bradycardia and QT lengthening to 500 to 700 msec. Recent electrophysiologic studies suggest that this paradox is likely due to the differential block of ion channels in endocardium, epicardium, midmyocardial (M) cells, and Purkinje fibers in the ventricular myocardium. There is also clinical evidence suggesting that amiodarone reduces the “torsadogenic” effects of pure class III agents. Ranolazine was also synthesized for the development of antianginal properties that stem from a partial inhibition of fatty acid oxidation; it too has been found to have electrophysioloigic properties. These are somewhat similar to those of amiodarone on ion channels in endocardium, epicardium, M cells, and Purkinje fibers in the ventricular myocardium, but the drug does not prolong the QT interval to the same extent as amiodarone does. Thus, the drug produces modest increases in repolarization as judged by its effects on the action potential duration (APD) without the potential for the development of torsades de pointes. By virtue of its suppressant action on early afterdepolarizations and triggered activity in Purkinje fibers and M cells, the drug appears to have a powerful potential for reducing the torsadogenic proclivity of conventional class III antiarrhythmic compounds. The rationale for the therapeutic niche for amiodarone, and especially in the case of ranolazine, in the prevention of drug-induced torsades de pointes is discussed.

Azimilide dihydrochloride

Azimilide dihydrochloride is an antiarrhythmic drug with Vaughn Williams class III properties, which blocks both fast (IKr) and slow (IKs) components of the delayed rectifier cardiac potassium channel. The drug slows the heart rate slightly and, like other class III antiarrhythmic drugs, prolongs ventricular repolarization and thus, the QT interval. Unlike sotalol, another class III antiarrhythmic drug, azimilide does not exhibit reverse-use dependence, that is, its binding characteristics and effectiveness are not related to the heart rate. Azimilide is 85% bioavailable, reaches peak blood concentrations in 6-8 h and has a long elimination half-life of 114 h. Clinical trials have utilized once-daily dosing. These trials have tested the use of the drug for patients with supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.

Drug therapy for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently diagnosed arrhythmia. Prevalence increases with age, and the overall incidence is expected to increase as the population continues to age. Choice of pharmacologic therapy for atrial fibrillation depends on whether or not the goal of treatment is maintaining sinus rhythm or tolerating atrial fibrillation with adequate control of ventricular rates. New antiarrhythmic drugs are being tested in clinical trials. Drugs that target remodeling and inflammation are being tested for their use as prevention of AF or as adjunctive therapy.

Cumulative Experience of Azimilide-Associated Torsades de Pointes Ventricular Tachycardia in the 19 Clinical Studies Comprising the Azimilide Database

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, temporal characteristics, and risk factors associated with azimilide-associated torsades de pointes (TdP) ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND

Azimilide dihydrochloride is a class III antiarrhythmic drug possessing Ikr and Iks channel-blocking properties.

METHODS

Oral azimilide (75 to 125 mg/day) was taken by 5,375 patients in 19 clinical trials conducted at 775 international centers. Of 3,964 patients in double-blind studies, 1,427 had a history of atrial fibrillation or other supraventricular arrhythmia, 510 had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and 2,027 were post-myocardial infarction patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%.

RESULTS

The TdP occurred in 56 patients assigned to azimilide, was dose-related, and tended to occur earlier with an azimilide-loading regimen. Forty-three percent of TdP patients had a QT interval corrected by Bazett's formula, for heart rate, (QTc) > or =500 ms at the time of or before the TdP occurrence. Significant risk factors using logistic regression were increasing age, female gender, diuretic use, and lack of aspirin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide-associated TdP has characteristics and risk factors similar to other Ikr blockers. However, there is a distinctive temporal profile. The TdP events are not concentrated in the first week. The azimilide-associated TdP rate is 1% (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.35) and is not increased in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction, even in women.

Efficacy of azimilide for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the presence and absence of structural heart disease

Azimilide hydrochloride (azimilide), an investigational antiarrhythmic drug, has shown variable efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to assess its efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF and heart disease. Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were screened for 1 month by transtelephonic monitoring. After recording 1 episode of AF in the screening period, they were randomized to receive azimilide 125 mg or placebo once daily. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of congestive heart failure or coronary heart disease (CHF/CHD). A maximum of 220 patients without CHF/CHD were randomized, with the remainder having CHF/CHD. Patients with CHF/CHD were monitored for 3 days during loading. The primary efficacy analysis was the time to the first symptomatic recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group. Secondary analyses were the time to the first recurrence in the entire population and the time to the first recurrence in those with significant structural heart disease. The median time to recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group was 10 days in the 2 treatment arms. Nonsignificant trends were seen toward efficacy of azimilide in the CHF/CHD group (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.70, p=0.087), structural heart disease group (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.56, p=0.11), and overall group (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.49, p=0.053). No patient died. In conclusion, azimilide showed a nonsignificant trend toward efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF.

[New antiarrhythmic drugs for therapy of atrial fibrillation: I. Ion channel blockers]

During the last ten years we have made substantial progress in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. The high rate associated alterations in electrical and structural properties of the atria, referred to as atrial remodeling, promote the progression of atrial fibrillation. The development of new therapeutic approaches addresses three different directions: (i) prevention of atrial remodeling, especially of structural remodeling; (ii) increase of long-term efficacy of currently used drugs and improvement of their side-effect profile; and (iii) design of atria- and pathology-specific antiarrhythmic drugs without concomitant proarrhythmic effects in the ventricles. The current review outlines the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and focuses on electrical remodeling. The properties of new antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation are discussed in detail.

Characterization of the in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological effects of the novel antiarrhythmic agent AZD7009 in atrial and ventricular tissue of the dog

This study evaluated the effects of the novel antiarrhythmic agent AZD7009 on atrial and ventricular repolarization and on the Na+-current system, using Vmax as an index. Anesthetized dogs were infused with AZD7009 or azimilide to produce three pseudo steady-state plasma concentrations in vivo. Microelectrode techniques were used to record action potentials and effective refractory period (ERP) in vitro. Whereas AZD7009 concentration-dependently increased atrial ERP (AERP, by 48 +/- 7 milliseconds maximum, P < 0.001 versus vehicle), the increases in ventricular ERP (VERP, 8 +/- 4 milliseconds) and QT interval (2 +/- 5.5 milliseconds) were small and not concentration-dependent. For azimilide, the AERP increase was less, whereas VERP and QT increases were substantially larger than with AZD7009. In vitro, AZD7009 concentration-dependently reduced Vmax and increased action potential duration (APD). ERP was increased through APD lengthening and post-repolarization refractoriness. The suppression of Vmax, but not APD prolongation, showed frequency-dependence. APD and ERP increases were more pronounced in atrial than ventricular tissue: in atria, 2 microM AZD7009 increased APD90 and ERP from 224 +/- 7 to 318 +/- 7 milliseconds and 241 +/- 7 milliseconds to 378 +/- 17 milliseconds; versus 257 +/- 5 to 283 +/- 7 milliseconds and 253 +/- 12 to 300 +/- 11 milliseconds respectively in ventricles. Thus, AZD7009 potently and predominantly increases atrial refractoriness in the dog, with actions mediated by combined effects on repolarization and the Na+-current system.

Pharmacological properties and functional role of Kslow current in mouse pancreatic beta-cells: SK channels contribute to Kslow tail current and modulate insulin secretion

The pharmacological properties of slow Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ current (K_slow) were investigated in mouse pancreatic β-cells and islets to understand how K_slow contributes to the control of islet bursting, [Ca²⁺]_i oscillations, and insulin secretion. K_slow was insensitive to apamin or the K_ATP channel inhibitor tolbutamide, but UCL 1684, a potent and selective nonpeptide SK channel blocker reduced the amplitude of K_slow tail current in voltage-clamped mouse β-cells. K_slow was also selectively and reversibly inhibited by the class III antiarrythmic agent azimilide (AZ). In isolated β-cells or islets, pharmacologic inhibition of K_slow by UCL 1684 or AZ depolarized β-cell silent phase potential, increased action potential firing, raised [Ca²⁺]_i, and enhanced glucose-dependent insulin secretion. AZ inhibition of K_slow also supported mediation by SK, rather than cardiac-like slow delayed rectifier channels since bath application of AZ to HEK 293 cells expressing SK3 cDNA reduced SK current. Further, AZ-sensitive K_slow current was extant in β-cells from KCNQ1 or KCNE1 null mice lacking cardiac slow delayed rectifier currents. These results strongly support a functional role for SK channel-mediated K_slow current in β-cells, and suggest that drugs that target SK channels may represent a new approach for increasing glucose-dependent insulin secretion. The apamin insensitivity of β-cell SK current suggests that β-cells express a unique SK splice variant or a novel heteromultimer consisting of different SK subunits.

The Metabolic Profile of Azimilide in Man: In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations

The metabolic fate of azimilide in man is unusual as it undergoes a cleavage in vivo resulting in the formation of two classes of structurally distinct metabolites. During a metabolite profiling study conducted in human volunteers to assess the contribution of all pathways to the clearance of (14)C-azimilide, greater than 82% of radioactivity was recovered in urine (49%-58%) and feces (33%). Urine, feces, and plasma were profiled for metabolites. A cleaved metabolite, 4-chloro-2-phenyl furoic acid was present at high concentration in plasma (metabolite/parent AUC ratio approx. 4), while other plasma metabolites, azimilide N-oxide (metabolite/parent AUC ratio 0.001), and a cleaved hydantoin metabolite (metabolite/parent AUC ratio = 0.3) were present at lower concentrations than azimilide. In urine, the cleaved metabolites were the major metabolites, (> 35% of the dose) along with phenols (as conjugates, 7%-8%), azimilide N-oxide (4%-10%), a butanoic acid metabolite (2%-3%), and desmethyl azimilide (2%). A limited investigation of fecal metabolites indicated that azimilide (3%-5%), desmethyl azimilide (1%-3%), and the butanoic acid metabolite (< 1%) were present. Contributing pathways for metabolism of azimilide, identified through in vitro and in-vivo studies, were CYPs 1A1 (est. 28%), 3A4/5 (est. 20%), 2D6 (< 1%), FMO (est. 14%), and cleavage (35%). Enzyme(s) involved in the cleavage of azimilide were not identified.

Electrophysiological effects of azimilide in an in vitro model of simulated-ischemia and reperfusion in guinea-pig ventricular myocardium

There are few investigations on azimilide effects during ischemia/reperfusion. We have therefore investigated low concentrations of azimilide (0.1 and 0.5 micromol/l) versus Controls on action potential parameters and occurrence of repetitive responses during simulated ischemia and reperfusion. An in vitro model of "border zone" in guinea-pig ventricular myocardium (n=30) was used. Azimilide 0.5 micromol/l lengthened action potential duration in normoxic but not in ischemic-like conditions. Therefore an increased dispersion of action potential duration at 90% of repolarization during simulated ischemia in presence of azimilide was seen. Upon reperfusion, both normal and reperfused myocardium showed azimilide-induced action potential duration increase. There was a neutral effect on the occurrence of arrhythmias during simulated ischemia; however azimilide showed significant (P=0.033) antiarrhythmic properties following reperfusion. To mimic I(Kr) and I(Ks) blocking properties of azimilide we further used dofetilide 10 nmol/l with HMR 1556 1 nmol/l (N=9), which was accompanied by less severe shortening (P<0.05) of action potential duration at 90% of repolarization at 30 min of ischemic-like conditions (-43+/-9%), as compared with azimilide 0.5 micromol/l (-64+/-5%) but similar to what seen with azimilide 0.1 micromol/l (-53+/-5%) and Controls (-52+/-6%). During reperfusion, 2/9 (22%) preparations had sustained activities, which was less than what observed in Controls (5/10, 50%) and with azimilide 0.5 micromol/l (0/10, 0%), although not statistically different (respectively, P=0.35 and P=0.21). Lack versus homogenous class III effects of azimilide in respectively simulated ischemia and reperfusion may explain its different efficacy on arrhythmias, although prevention of reperfusion arrhythmias calls for other than just its I(Kr) and I(Ks) blocking properties.

Mortality in patients after a recent myocardial infarction: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of azimilide using heart rate variability for risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Depressed left ventricular function (LVF) and low heart rate variability (HRV) identify patients at risk of increased mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). Azimilide, a novel class III antiarrhythmic drug, was investigated for its effects on mortality in patients with depressed LVF after recent MI and in a subpopulation of patients with low HRV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3717 post-MI patients with depressed LVF were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of azimilide 100 mg on all-cause mortality. Placebo patients with low HRV had a significantly higher 1-year mortality than those with high HRV (>20 U; 15% versus 9.5%, P<0.0005) despite nearly identical ejection fractions. No significant differences were observed between the 100-mg azimilide and placebo groups for all-cause mortality in either the "at-risk" patients identified by depressed LVF (12% versus 12%) or the subpopulation of "high-risk" patients identified by low HRV (14% versus 15%) or for total cardiac or arrhythmic mortality. Significantly fewer patients receiving azimilide developed atrial fibrillation than did patients receiving placebo (0.5% versus 1.2%, P<0.04). The incidences of torsade de pointes and severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < or =500 cells/microL) were slightly higher in the azimilide group than in the placebo group (0.3% versus 0.1% for torsade de pointes and 0.9% versus 0.2% for severe neutropenia).

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide did not improve or worsen the mortality of patients after MI. Low HRV independently identified a subpopulation at high risk of mortality.

State-Dependent Blocking Actions of Azimilide Dihydrochlo-ride (NE-10064) on Human Cardiac Na+ Channels

BACKGROUND

Azimilide reportedly blocks Na(+) channels, although its mechanism remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The kinetic properties of the azimilide block of the wild-type human Na(+) channels (WT: hH1) and mutant DeltaKPQ Na(+) channels (DeltaKPQ) expressed in COS7 cells were investigated using the whole-cell patch clamp technique and a Markovian state model. Azimilide induced tonic block of WT currents by shifting the h infinity curve in the hyperpolarizing direction and caused phasic block of WT currents with intermediate recovery time constant. The peak and steady-state DeltaKPQ currents were blocked by azimilide, although with only a slight shift in the h infinity curve. The phasic block of peak and steady-state DeltaKPQ currents by azimilide was significantly larger than the blocking of the peak WT current. The affinity of azimilide predicted by a Markovian state model was higher for both the activated state (Kd(A) =1.4 micromol/L), and the inactivated state (Kd(I) =1.4 micromol/L), of WT Na(+) channels than that for the resting state (Kd(R) =102.6 micromol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

These experimental and simulation studies suggest that azimilide blocks the human cardiac Na(+) channel in both the activated and inactivated states.

Azimilide decreases recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effects of azimilide dihydrochloride (AZ) on anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and shock-terminated events in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

BACKGROUND

Animal studies have shown the effectiveness of AZ for therapy of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Azimilide dihydrochloride was investigated as adjunctive treatment for reducing the frequency of VT and, thus, the need for ICD therapies, including ATP and cardioversion/defibrillation (ICD shocks) in patients with inducible monomorphic VT.

METHODS

A total of 172 patients were randomized to daily treatment with placebo, 35 mg, 75 mg, or 125 mg of oral AZ in this dose-ranging pilot study of patients with ICDs. The majority of patients had a history of documented remote myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class II or III.

RESULTS

The frequency of appropriate shocks and ATP were significantly decreased among AZ-treated patients compared with placebo patients. The incidence of ICD therapies per patient-year among the placebo group was 36, and it was 10, 12, and 9 among 35 mg, 75 mg, and 125 mg AZ patients, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.31, p = 0.0001). Azimilide dihydrochloride was generally well tolerated and did not affect left ventricular ejection fraction or minimal energy requirements for defibrillation or pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide dihydrochloride may be a safe and effective drug for reducing the frequency of VT and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implanted ICDs.

Symptoms at the time of arrhythmia recurrence in patients receiving azimilide for control of atrial fibrillation or flutter: results from randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Azimilide is a new antiarrhythmic agent being developed for the management for atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF). Four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials have been performed that investigated the effect of azimilide on time to first recurrence of symptomatic AF. This paper examines the data collected during those studies regarding the symptoms reported by patients at the time of AF recurrence

METHODS

At the time that patients reported their first documented symptomatic recurrence of arrhythmia, they were systematically asked whether or not they were experiencing any of the following 6 symptoms: palpitation, fatigue, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, or sweating. Patients were required to answer yes or no. A symptom score was created varying from 0 to 6, in increasing order of number of symptoms reported. This was compared for patients receiving either of 2 doses of azimilide or placebo. The relationship between the number of symptoms, heart rate at time of arrhythmia recurrence and treatment was analyzed.

RESULTS

In 2 separate studies, azimilide at a dose of 125 mg/day significantly reduced the number of symptoms at the time of arrhythmia recurrence compared to placebo. On the other hand, in 2 studies, the dose of 100 mg/day did not significantly reduce symptom burden. The individual symptoms significantly reduced by azimilide125 mg/day were fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain and dizziness. Palpitations and sweating were not significantly reduced. Modeling of heart rate at the time of arrhythmia recurrence, symptoms and treatment indicated that a small reduction in heart rate with azimilide accounted for only a small part of the symptom reduction. There was another effect of azimilide: an average reduction of 0.38 symptoms (P <.01) that was independent of heart rate.

CONCLUSION

Azimilide (125 mg/day) reduces the number of symptoms reported at the time of AF recurrence.

Multiple cellular electrophysiological effects of azimilide in canine cardiac preparations

The cellular electrophysiological effect of azimilide (0.1-30 microM) was analyzed in canine ventricular preparations by applying the standard microelectrode and patch-clamp techniques at 37 degrees C. In papillary muscle, the drug prolonged the action potential duration (APD) in a concentration-dependent manner at a cycle length (CL) of 1000 ms. In Purkinje fibers, at the same CL, the concentration-dependent lengthening of the APD was observed in the presence of up to 3 microM azimilide (at 3.0 microM: 24.1+/-4.2%, n=9); at higher drug concentration, no further APD prolongation was observed. Azimilide lengthened APD in a reverse frequency-dependent manner in papillary muscle and Purkinje fibers alike. Azimilide (10 microM) caused a rate-dependent depression in the maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential (V(max)) in papillary muscle. The time and rate constants of the offset and onset kinetics of this V(max) block were 1754+/-267 ms (n=6) and 5.1+/-0.4 beats (n=6), respectively. Azimilide did not prevent the APD shortening effect of 10 microM pinacidil in papillary muscle, suggesting that the drug does not influence the ATP-sensitive K(+) current. Azimilide inhibited the rapid (I(Kr)) and slow component (I(Ks)) of the delayed rectifier K(+) current and the L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca)). The estimated EC(50) value of the drug was 0.59 microM for I(Ks), 0.39 microM for I(Kr) and 7.5 microM for I(Ca). The transient outward (I(to)) and the inward rectifier (I(k1)) K(+) currents were not influenced by the drug. It is concluded that the site of action of azimilide is multiple, it inhibits not only K(+) (I(Kr), I(Ks)) currents but, in higher concentrations, it also exerts calcium- and use-dependent sodium channel block.

Atrial fibrillation: epidemiologic considerations and rationale for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm

Atrial fibrillation is now the most common cardiac arrhythmia for which a patient is hospitalized. Clinically, it presents in a form that is paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent and may be symptomatic or asymptomatic, occurring in the setting of either no cardiac disease ("lone atrial fibrillation") or, most often, in association with an underlying disease. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a 2-fold increase in mortality and, in the United States alone, causes over 75,000 cases of stroke per year. The annual prevalence of stroke is 5% to 7%, but the use of adequate anticoagulation can reduce this to less than 1%. Atrial fibrillation is a disorder of the elderly, with almost equal prevalence in men and women. In the United States, 80% of atrial fibrillation occurs in patients over the age of 65 years, and its prevalence tracks that of heart failure, which may be the cause, as well as the result, of the arrhythmia. Both conditions are increasing in epidemic proportions in the aging population. The most common causes of atrial fibrillation are hypertensive heart disease, coronary artery disease, and heart failure with a miscellany of lesser conditions, with about 10% lacking structural heart disease. Unlike other supraventricular arrhythmias, cure by the use of catheter ablation and surgical techniques has not been a reality except in a relatively small number of cases. However, restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm remain the initial goal of therapy for most patients. Pharmacologic approaches remain the mainstay of therapy for rate control and anticoagulation as well as for maintenance of sinus rhythm following pharmacological or electrical conversion. The changing epidemiology of atrial fibrillation is highlighted, with the focus on its conversion by the use of newer and novel antifibrillatory agents relative to the mechanisms of the arrhythmia, to restore the stability of sinus rhythm.

New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, the prevalence of which is increasing with the aging of the population. Because of its clinical importance and the lack of highly satisfactory management approaches, AF is the subject of active clinical and research efforts. This paper reviews recent and on-going developments in pharmacological and non-drug management of AF. The ideal therapeutic goal for AF is the production and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Comparative studies suggest that available class I and III drugs have comparable and modest efficacy for sinus rhythm maintenance. Amiodarone, with actions of all antiarrhythmic classes, has recently been shown to have clearly superior efficacy compared with other available drugs. Newer agents are in development, but their advantages are as yet unclear and appear limited. A potentially interesting approach is the prescription of drugs upon the occurrence of an attack, rather than on a continuous basis. Recent insights into AF mechanisms may permit therapy to prevent development of the AF substrate. An alternative to sinus rhythm maintenance is a rate control approach, with no attempt to prevent AF. Drugs to effect rate control include digitalis, beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Digitalis has limited value for control of exercise heart rate and for paroxysmal AF, but is particularly well suited for patients with concomitant AF and congestive heart failure. AV-nodal ablation and pacing is an effective alternative for rate control but leaves the patient pacemaker dependent. The relative merits of rate versus rhythm control are being evaluated in ongoing trials, preliminary results of which indicate no statistically significant differences in primary endpoints but highlight the risks of rhythm control therapy. In patients requiring pacemakers, physiological pacing (dual chamber devices or atrial pacing) has an advantage over purely ventricular pacemakers in AF prevention. Newer pacing modalities that produce more synchronised atrial activation, as well as pacemakers that prevent excessive atrial rate swings, show promise in AF prevention and may soon see wider use. The usefulness of automatic atrial defibrillators is presently limited by discomfort during shocks. Targeted destruction of pulmonary vein foci by radiofrequency catheter ablation suppresses paroxysmal AF. Efficacy in persistent AF is lower and still under study. Problems include potential recurrence in other veins and a small but nontrivial risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. Surgical division of the atria into zones with limited electrical connection, the MAZE procedure, is highly effective in AF prevention but is a major intervention that is not applicable to most patients. In conclusion, significant advances are being made in the management of patients with AF but much more work remains to be done.

The effect of isoproterenol on the class III effect of azimilide in humans

BACKGROUND

Many class III antiarrhythmic agents lose efficacy under beta-adrenergic stimulation and at high heart rates (reverse rate dependence). This effect is thought to be due to selective blockade of the rapidly (I(Kr)), but not the slowly (I(Ks)), activating component of the delayed inward rectifier potassium current. Azimilide is an investigational class III antiarrhythmic agent that blocks both IKr and IKs.

METHODS

We investigated the electrophysiologic effect of azimilide with and without beta-adrenergic stimulation in humans. Right ventricular effective refractory period at cycle lengths of 600 and 400 milliseconds and monophasic right ventricular action potential duration at 90% repolarization at cycle lengths of 250, 300, 400, 500 and 600 milliseconds were measured in 13 patients at baseline. Isoproterenol was then infused to increase the heart rate to 125% of baseline, and the pacing protocol was repeated. Patients then received, in a single-blind randomized manner, azimilide dihydrochloride (4.5 mg/kg intravenous loading dose followed by 0.625 mg/kg/h) plus either isoproterenol at the previous dose, or saline. After measurements were taken, treatment groups were crossed over, the azimilide infusion was continued and the procedure repeated.

RESULTS

Azimilide significantly (P < 0.05) prolonged monophasic action potential duration compared to baseline at all cycle lengths except for the 250 millisecond cycle length. In the presence of isoproterenol, azimilide maintained its class III effect, prolonging the action potential duration at 90% repolarization by a mean of 8.7 +/- 3.9 milliseconds, (3.7 +/- 1.7%), whereas isoproterenol alone shortened the action potential duration at 90% repolarization by -2.6 +/- 3.2 milliseconds (-1.2 +/- 1.4%) (P = 0.0051). Isoproterenol alone shortened the right ventricular effective refractory period by -13.6 +/- 3.4 milliseconds, whereas with isoproterenol in the presence of azimilide, the right ventricular effective refractory period was essentially unaffected (-1.4 +/- 3.4 milliseconds, P = 0.0085).

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide maintained its class III effect in the presence of isoproterenol and at increased heart rates, suggesting that IKs block may be of particular benefit in these circumstances.

Combination IK1 and IKr channel blockade: no additive lowering of the defibrillation threshold

Selective blockade of the inward rectifier potassium channel I(K1) by barium, or of the rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium channel I(Kr) by D,L-sotalol, prolongs repolarization and reduces the defibrillation threshold (DFT). This study hypothesized that combination I(K1) and I(Kr) channel block would produce concentration-dependent additive effects on DFT and ventricular refractoriness. A range of barium and D,L-sotalol concentrations, alone and in combination, were examined with respect to DFT, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and ventricular fibrillation cycle length (VFCL) in 133 Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Barium produced a concentration-dependent reduction of DFT (-49+/-4%), with concentration-dependent increases in VERP (26+/-6%) and VFCL (42+/-18%). D,L-Sotalol produced a concentration-dependent lowering of DFT (-53+/-6%) with a concentration-dependent increase in VFCL (34+/-8%) but not VERP. Low (1.6 microM), intermediate (3.1 microM), and high (12.5 microM) barium concentrations combined with varying D,L-sotalol concentrations produced equal or smaller decreases in DFT compared with corresponding doses of barium or D,L-sotalol alone. Except at the lowest concentrations of barium (1.6 and 3.1 microM) (p < 0.05), there was no significant additive interaction between barium and D,L-sotalol on VERP or VFCL. Combination I(K1) and I(Kr) channel block by barium and D,L-sotalol does not produce additive reduction of DFT.

A Benefit-Risk Assessment of Class III Antiarrhythmic Agents

With beta-blockers as the exception, increasing doubt is emerging on the value of antiarrhythmic drug therapy following a series of trials that have either shown no mortality benefit or even an excess mortality. Vaughan Williams class I drugs are generally avoided in patients with structural heart disease, and class IV drugs are avoided in heart failure. Unfortunately, arrhythmias are a growing problem due to an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation and sudden death. The population is becoming older and more patients survive for a longer time period with congestive heart failure, which again increases the frequency of both supraventricular as well as ventricular arrhythmias. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs act by blocking repolarising currents and thereby prolong the effective refractory period of the myocardium. This is believed to facilitate termination of re-entry tachyarrhythmias. This class of drugs is developed for treatment of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide, and ibutilide are examples of class III drugs that are currently available. Amiodarone and sotalol have other antiarrhythmic properties in addition to pure class III action, which differentiates them from the others. However, all have potential serious adverse events. Proarrhythmia, especially torsade de pointes, is a common problem making the benefit-risk ratio of these drugs a key question. Class III drugs have been evaluated in different settings: primary and secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias and in treatment of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Based on existing evidence there is no routine indication for antiarrhythmic drug therapy other than beta-blockers in patients at high risk of sudden death. Subgroup analyses of trials with amiodarone and dofetilide suggest that patients with atrial fibrillation may have a mortality reduction with these drugs. However, this needs to be tested in a prospective trial. Similarly, subgroups that will benefit from prophylactic treatment with class III antiarrhythmic drugs may be found based on QT-intervals or - in the future - from genetic testing. Class III drugs are effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion. This is currently by far the most important indication for this class of drugs. As defined by recent guidelines, amiodarone and dofetilide have their place as second-line therapy except for patients with heart failure where they are first line therapy being the only drugs where the safety has been documented for this group of high risk patients.

Algorithms useful in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a heterogeneous disorder; its management must be individualized depending upon the mode of presentation, underlying substrate, and need for either rate or rhythm control. In hemodynamically unstable patients with new onset AF, conversion by electrical cardioversion is the preferred approach; however, in stable patients pharmacological options may be considered. Recurrence rate after conversion is high in the majority of patients, necessitating the use of antiarrhythmic agents. Because of modest efficacy and potential for untoward effects, various nonpharmacologic approaches are being explored. Some of these modalities are considered curative in the short-term but techniques are still being refined.

Dose-response relations of azimilide in the management of symptomatic, recurrent, atrial fibrillation

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of azimilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic agent that blocks both the slow and fast components of the cardiac-delayed rectifier potassium currents in 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with similar protocols. The purpose of this study was to assess the relation between dose and effect. A total of 1,380 patients with a documented history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter, or both, were enrolled. After a 3-day loading period during which the assigned dose was given twice a day, subjects received placebo or azimilide (35, 50, 75, 100, or 125 mg once a day) for the duration of the study period. The primary end point of the studies was the time to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence with a transtelephonic electrocardiogram typical of AF, atrial flutter, or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. For each study, Kaplan-Meier estimates of the median time to recurrence were computed for placebo and for each azimilide dose. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios for each active dose. Each of the 2 highest azimilide doses (100 and 125 mg/day) significantly prolonged the time to recurrence of arrhythmia. For the 100 mg/day dose, the hazard ratio was 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.72; p = 0.02. For the 125 mg/day dose, the hazard ratio was 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.62; p = 0.01. Patients with a history of either ischemic heart disease or congestive heart failure had a significantly greater treatment effect from azimilide than those without it. Torsades de Pointes occurred in 0.9% of patients receiving either of the 2 effective doses. Thus, doses of azimilide <100 mg/day are not effective for control of AF, whereas doses of 100 and 125 mg/day are effective with an acceptable risk of serious toxicity.

Interaction of azimilide with neurohumoral and channel receptors

Binding of the class III antiarrhythmic agent azimilide to brain, heart, and other organ receptors was assessed by standard radioligand binding techniques. In a survey of 60 receptors, azimilide at 10 microM inhibited binding by more than 50% at serotonin uptake (K(i): 0.6 microM), muscarinic (K(i): 0.9 to -3.0 microM), Na(+) channel site 2 (K(i): 4.3 microM), and central sigma (K(i): 6.2 microM) sites. Lesser (20-40%) inhibition was seen at adrenergic, histamine, serotonin, purinergic, angiotensin II, dopamine uptake, and norepinephrine sites and at a voltage-sensitive K(+) channel. In rat ventricle, azimilide inhibited binding to alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors (K(i): < 5 microM) and to the L-type Ca(2+) channel (K(i): 37.3 microM). In rat brain, azimilide blocked ligand binding to these same receptors and to a serotonin receptor, and the breadth and potency of its interaction pattern differentiated it from ten other class III antiarrhythmics. Azimilide displayed agonist and antagonist action at five muscarinic receptor subtypes in transfected NIH 3T3 cells producing receptor-sensitive mitogenesis and beta-galactosidase activity. Agonist action predominated at M(2) and M(4) subtypes, and antagonist action predominated at M(1), M(3), and M(5) subtypes. The azimilide concentration for 50% maximum stimulation (EC(50)) in M(2)-expressing cells was 1.97 microM (vs 0.14 microM for carbachol). Azimilide's receptor interactions occur at concentrations from one to forty times those required to block cardiac delayed-rectifier channels but could contribute to the efficacy and safety of the drug.

What niche will newer class III antiarrhythmic drugs occupy?

The decline in the use of sodium channel blockers has led to an expanding use of b-blockers and complex class III agents such as sotalol and amiodarone for controlling cardiac arrhythmias. Success with these agents in the context of their side effects has spurred the development of compounds with simpler ion channel-blocking properties with less complex adverse reactions. The resulting so-called pure class III agents were found to have antifibrillatory effects in atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter, as well as in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Pure class III compounds are effective in inducing acute chemical conversion of AF, in preventing paroxysmal AF, and in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF restored to sinus rhythm. Examples of such compounds are dofetilide, which selectively blocks IKr, and ibutilide, available only as an intravenous agent, which blocks the IKr and augments the inactivated Na+ current in atrial myocytes. Dofetilide and ibutilide have been introduced into clinical practice. Azimilide is the first of the class III agents that blocks both components (IKr and IKs) of the delayed rectifier current, which may confer certain electrophysiologic advantages. The potential therapeutic niche of ibutilide, dofetilide, and azimilide in the control of cardiac arrhythmias forms the basis of this review.

Pharmacogenetics of cardiac K(+) channels

A number of commonly prescribed drugs belonging to various therapeutic classes (antiarrhythmic, antibiotic, antifungal, antihistamine, antipsychotic, prokinetic drugs...) possess, in common, the adverse property to prolong cardiac repolarization [prolonged QT interval duration on surface electrocardiogram (ECG)], exposing patients to a risk of torsade-de-pointes arrhythmias, syncope, and sudden death. Arrhythmias related to drug-induced QT prolongation do not occur in every patient treated with these drugs but most likely occur in a subset of susceptible patients. These patients have a high risk of recurrence of arrhythmias upon exposure to any of the other drugs that broaden the QT interval. It is currently suspected (though not yet proven) that susceptible individuals carry a silent mutation in one of the genes responsible for the congenital long QT syndrome. Indeed, it appears more and more clear that a large proportion of congenital long QT syndrome gene carriers, have a normal QT interval and a normal phenotype and therefore, remain undiagnosed. Therefore, a much larger than previously thought proportion of the general population may be affected by asymptomatic mutations in cardiac ion channel encoding genes. No routine technology is currently available in identifying these patients preventively.

Synthesis and class III type antiarrhythmic activity of 4-aroyl (and aryl)-l-aralkylpiperazines

The synthesis and in vitro Class III antiarrhythmic activity of several 4-aroyl (and aryl)-1-aralkylpiperazine and piperidine derivatives are described. Among several potent compounds identified in the series, RWJ-28810 (3), with its EC20 of 3 nM, ranks as one of the most potent (in vitro) compounds reported.

Antiarrhythmic agents and proarrhythmia

The Vaughn Williams classification divides antiarrhythmic agents into four groups according to their effects on various ion channels. Class I agents block sodium channels and are subdivided into three groups. The use of class Ia agents is gradually on the decline, secondary to lack of a favorable risk/benefit ratio. Class Ib agents include lidocaine, which is extensively used for the acute treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Class Ic drugs are not advisable for patients with structural cardiac abnormalities secondary to a high risk of proarrhythmia. They are mainly used for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. beta blockers form class II. Class III agents, such as amiodarone and sotalol, prolong action potential duration and repolarization and are among the most widely used antiarrhythmics. They are the subject of active research, and newer agents are being developed. Calcium-channel blockers are grouped under class IV. Digoxin and adenosine have unique antiarrhythmic properties, which can be useful in the management of selected patients. All antiarrhythmic drugs have the potential to provoke arrhythmias and, therefore, should be used with caution. The risk of proarrhythmia is increased in patients with abnormal cardiac substrate, with electrolyte abnormalities, and during drug initiation. Correction of electrolyte imbalance and prevention of bradycardia while the drug is metabolized and/or excreted are the cornerstones of proarrhythmia management.

Antiarrhythmic effects of azimilide in atrial fibrillation: efficacy and dose-response. Azimilide Supraventricular Arrhythmia Program 3 (SVA-3) Investigators

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of azimilide, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, in reducing the frequency of symptomatic arrhythmia recurrences in patients with atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or both.

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is an increasingly common disorder of the heart rhythm, and most patients with this problem are identified because they have symptoms associated with their arrhythmia. New antiarrhythmic therapies are needed to treat patients with this problem.

METHODS

A total of 384 patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or both were randomly assigned to receive once daily doses of placebo or azimilide; recurrent symptomatic arrhythmias were documented using transtelephonic electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Azimilide 50 mg, 100 mg or 125 mg was tested; the primary efficacy analysis compared the time to first symptomatic recurrence in the combined azimilide 100 mg and 125 mg dose groups with that in the placebo group using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In the primary efficacy analysis, the time to first symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence was significantly prolonged in the combined azimilide 100 mg and 125 mg daily dose group compared with the placebo group (chi-square 7.96, p = 0.005); the hazard ratio (placebo: azimilide) for this comparison was 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15, 2.16). In comparisons between individual doses and placebo, the hazard ratio for the 50 mg daily dose was 1.17 (95% CI = 0.83, 1.66; p = 0.37); for the 100 mg group, dose was 1.38 (95% CI = 0.96, 1.98; p = 0.08), and for the 125 mg group, dose was 1.83 (95% CI = 1.24, 2.70; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide significantly lengthened the symptomatic arrhythmia-free interval in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or both.

Effects of azimilide on cardiovascular tissues from normo- and hypertensive rats

We tested whether azimilide has potential for use in the treatment of heart failure. Azimilide, > or =3 x 10(-5) M, had no effect on the quiescent Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rat aorta, or mesenteric and intralobar pulmonary arteries. Azimilide > or =3 x 10(-5) M relaxed the KCl-contracted aorta and portal vein. Azimilide, 10(-7)-10(-5) M, prolonged the WKY left ventricular action potential and augmented the force of contraction of left ventricle strips from 12- and 22-month-old WKY rats. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), at ages 12 and 22 months, are models of cardiac hypertrophy and failure, respectively. The augmentation of force with azimilide was similar on 12- and 22-month-old WKY rats and 12-month-old SHRs but reduced on the 22-month-old SHR left ventricle. Azimilide, 3 x 10(-6) and 10(-5) M, augmented the force responses of the 22-month-old SHR left ventricle by 40 and 50%, respectively. As azimilide is a vasodilator and positive inotrope in the rat, and the positive inotropic effect is present in heart failure, azimilide should undergo further testing as a positive inotrope for the treatment of heart failure.

Proarrhythmia of azimilide and other class III antiarrhythmic agents in the adrenergically stimulated rabbit

The ventricular proarrhythmic actions of five class III antiarrhythmic agents were compared in the Carlsson rabbit model. In adrenergically stimulated anesthetized rabbits, azimilide, clofilium, dofetilide, sematilide, and d,l-sotalol caused premature ventricular contractions and nonsustained and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (NSVT and SVT) at pharmacologically equivalent intravenous doses that increased QTc intervals 20% (ED20). There were no significant differences between agents in the percentage of rabbits with serious arrhyhthmias at the ED20 doses of 5.2, 0.033, 0.015, 0.66, and 2.8 mg/kg i.v., respectively. Proarrhythmia was dose-dependent. Linear regression analysis of arrhythmia score versus log dose estimated the NSVT doses as 6.2, 0.055, 0.0089, 1.5, and 5.7, respectively. Analysis of arrhythmia states during a 10-min window after infusion when QTc prolongation was 20% showed that the compounds differed significantly in the proportion of time treated rabbits spent in SVT and combined NSVT and SVT. Rabbits treated with azimilide spent significantly less time in SVT and combined NSVT and SVT, followed in order of increasing time by d,l-sotalol, sematilide, clofilium, and dofetilide.

Azimilide

Azimilide is a potassium channel antagonist that, in contrast to existing class III antiarrhythmic agents, blocks both the rapidly (I(Kr)) and slowly (I(Ks)) activating components of the delayed rectifier potassium current. In animal and clinical studies, azimilide prolonged repolarisation by increasing the action potential duration and effective refractory period. In animal models, azimilide was effective in terminating both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Azimilide also demonstrated antifibrillatory efficacy in a canine model of sudden cardiac death. In patients with a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, oral azimilide controlled arrhythmias more effectively than placebo in a 6-month randomised double-blind study. At a dosage of 125 mg once daily, azimilide significantly increased the time to first symptomatic recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter. However, no significant difference between placebo and azimilide was found in another study. Oral azimilide 100 mg once daily demonstrated clinically significant treatment effects in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In clinical trials, azimilide was generally well tolerated and headache was the most commonly occurring adverse event. Azimilide is associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmic events, such as torsades de pointes, and few serious adverse events have been reported.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy

In the past 2 years, significant advances have been made in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic agents are increasingly being used as adjunct therapy to decrease the frequency of ICD discharges. Sotalol was recently shown to be effective in reducing tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Intravenous amiodarone is being used for the acute treatment of unstable ventricular arrhythmia and is being investigated for the treatment of acute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Class III agents are increasingly being used for prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and data point to an important role for these agents in reducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Future studies will need to directly compare these agents with pure anti-adrenergic maneuvers in postoperative patients. In addition to terminating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ibutilide significantly reduces human atrial defibrillation thresholds and increases the percentage of patients who can be cardioverted from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve dofetilide for clinical use soon, and it is currently reviewing azimilide (which seems to be devoid of frequency-dependent effects on repolarization) for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dronedarone, tedisamal, and trecetilide are now under active study intended to determine their usefulness in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies are ongoing to identify pharmacologic agents that will selectively prolong repolarization in the atria without exerting electrophysiologic effects in the ventricles.

Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the subject of considerable attention and intensive clinical research in recent years. Current opinion among physicians on the management of AF favors the restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. This has several potential benefits, including the alleviation of arrhythmia-associated symptoms, hemodynamic improvements, and possibly a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. After normal sinus rhythm has been restored, antiarrhythmic therapy is necessary to reduce the frequency of AF recurrence. In the selection of an antiarrhythmic agent, both efficacy and safety should be taken into consideration. Many antiarrhythmic agents have the capacity to provoke proarrhythmia, which may result in an increase in mortality. This is of particular concern with sodium-channel blockers in the context of patients with structural heart disease. Flecainide and propafenone are well tolerated and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients without significant cardiac disease but with AF. Recent interest has focused on the use of class III antiarrhythmic agents, such as amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide (recently approved), ibutilide (approved for chemical conversion of AF and atrial flutter), and azimilide (still to be approved) in patients with AF and structural heart disease. To date, amiodarone and sotalol still hold the greatest interest, and although controlled clinical trials with these agents have been few, a number are in progress and some have been recently completed. These agents are effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and are associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmia when used appropriately. Because of the relative paucity of placebo-controlled trials of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with AF, experience until recently has tended to dictate treatment decisions. Increasingly, selection of drug therapy is being based on a careful and individualized benefit-risk evaluation by means of controlled clinical trials, an approach that is likely to dominate the overall approach to the control of atrial fibrillation in the largest numbers of cases of the arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy is likely to be dominated by compounds that exert their predominant effect by prolonging atrial repolarization.

Effects of azimilide, a KV(r) and KV(s) blocker, on canine ventricular arrhythmia models

Using canine coronary artery ligation/reperfusion and adrenaline arrhythmia models, we determined the effects of azimilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, E-1-[[(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-furanyl) methylene]-amino]-3-[4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)butyl]-2,4-imidazolidi nedione dihydrochloride. The coronary ligation/reperfusion arrhythmia experiments were divided into two groups, one using low heart rate halothane-anesthetized and the other using high heart rate pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Azimilide (6 mg kg(-1) + 0.1 mg kg(-1) min(-1) i.v.) prolonged the corrected QT interval (QTc), decreased the heart rate and suppressed the premature ventricular complexes during ligation (35 +/- 17 beats/30 min as compared with 909 +/- 246 in the control group), and also suppressed ventricular fibrillation induced by coronary ligation/reperfusion in the two groups (1/8 halothane-anesthetized dogs as compared with 7/8 dogs in the control group and 2/8 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs as compared with 8/8 dogs in the control group). In adrenaline arrhythmia, azimilide hastened the onset of adrenaline arrhythmias and also aggravated the arrhythmias, showing proarrhythmic effects.

The molecular and ionic specificity of antiarrhythmic drug actions

Virtually all clinical antiarrhythmic agents act by reducing ion channel conductance, with sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), and calcium (Ca++) channels the primary targets. Na+ channel blockers increase the risk of ischemic ventricular fibrillation and are relatively contraindicated in the presence of active coronary heart disease. Ca++ channel blockers suppress AV nodal conduction and are used to terminate reentrant supraventricular arrhythmias and control the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation. K+ channels constitute the most diverse group of cardiac ion channels. They are the primary targets of Class III antiarrhythmic drugs, the category of such agents presently undergoing the most active development. The rapid delayed rectifier, IKr, plays a key role in repolarization of all cardiac tissues and is the most common (and often only) target of action potential-prolonging drugs. Unfortunately, because of the ubiquity of IKr and the reverse use-dependent action potential prolongation that results from blocking it, IKr blockers are likely to cause torsades de pointes ventricular proarrhythmia. K+ channel blockers, such as amiodarone and azimilide, that affect the slow delayed rectifier IKs as well as IKr, appear to produce a more desirable rate-dependent profile of Class III action. Recently, much has been learned about the molecular basis of K+ channels based on their role in the congenital long QT syndrome. The availability of molecular clones that encode many of the channels in the human heart allows for the rapid screening of many potential new drugs, making possible the development of "designer" antiarrhythmic drugs with specific profiles of channel-blocking selectivity.

Current antiarrhythmic drugs: an overview of mechanisms of action and potential clinical utility

Reorientation in drug therapy to control cardiac arrhythmias continues to evolve in the wake of ongoing refinements in techniques and indications for radiofrequency ablation and the use of implantable devices for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The role of sodium channel blockers continues to be questioned, and data from clinical trials indicate that the use of this class of drugs should be limited to control symptoms in patients who have arrhythmias and either no or minimal heart disease. The decline in the use of sodium channel blockers has led to greater use of beta blockers and complex Class III agents, such as sotalol and amiodarone, as both primary therapy and adjunctive therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients with cardiac disease of varying degrees of ventricular dysfunction. Success with these Class III agents in the context of their side effects has led to the synthesis and characterization of compounds with simpler ion channel-blocking properties. The need for such compounds stemmed from the observation that atrial fibrillation (AF) as an arrhythmia is, for the most part, still not amenable to curative therapy by interventional procedures. The isolated block of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier current (IKr) has been found to have either a neutral (e.g., dofetilide) or deleterious (e.g., d-sotalol) effect on mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction. Thus, the objective of drug development should be the appropriate match between the substrate and an antiarrhythmic drug. The so-called pure Class III agents have been shown to have beneficial antifibrillatory effects in patients with AF. They are effective in inducing acute chemical conversion, preventing paroxysmal AF, and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF restored to sinus rhythm with DC cardioversion. AF is a complex arrhythmia, undoubtedly a result of multifaceted derangement of atrial ionic currents. Attention has therefore focused on newer compounds that have the propensity to block more than one ion channel. Examples of such agents are tedisamil and azimilide, the latter having been studied extensively in humans. It is the first of the Class III agents that block both components (IKr and IKs) of the delayed rectifier current, which results in a spectrum of electrophysiologic properties that includes lack of rate or use dependency in terms of effect on repolarization and refractoriness of atrial and ventricular myocardium. Available but unpublished clinical data indicate that azimilide may be effective over a wide range of tachycardia cycle lengths with a low incidence of torsades de pointes. In these respects, its properties, at least in terms of its use in AF, resemble those of amiodarone. However, the drug has little or no effect on AV conduction, which precludes the modulation of ventricular response in patients relapsing to AF.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy

During the past 10 years there has been a major shift in antiarrhythmic drug development from class I to class III antiarrhythmic agents. The first two class III antiarrhythmic drugs that became available, sotalol and amiodarone, also have potent antiadrenergic actions. Newer antiarrhythmic drugs either block a specific ionic current (e.g., dofetilide-induced blockade of the rapidly activating component of the delayed rectifier potassium current) or block multiple ionic channels (e.g., ibutilide and azimilide) in order to prolong atrial and ventricular action potentials without other specific pharmacologic effects. Recent data suggest that these new class III antiarrhythmic drugs are highly effective for treating patients with rhythm disorders with an acceptable degree of proarrhythmia. This manuscript reviews the newer class III agents' effectiveness in treating atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and the recent studies examining drug-induced prolongation of atrial repolarization to prevent or terminate postoperative atrial fibrillation.

IKs, a Slow and Intriguing Cardiac K+ Channel and Its Associated Long QT Diseases

Shaping of cardiac action potentials depends on a finely tuned orchestra of ion channels. Among them, K(+) channels probably form the most diverse family. They are responsible for inwardly rectifying (I(K1), I(KAch), I(KATP)), transient (I(to)), and sustained outward rectifying (I(Kur), I(Kr), I(Ks)) K(+) currents. The properties of these cardiac K(+) channels have recently been extensively reviewed. This article focuses on recent progress made toward understanding the molecular structure of the particular channel responsible for the slow outward K(+) current I(Ks) and its implication in the delayed ventricular repolarization that characterizes the congenital long QT syndrome.

Azimilide dihydrochloride, a novel antiarrhythmic agent

Azimilide, a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent, blocks both the slowly activating (IKs) and rapidly activating (IKr) components of the delayed rectifier potassium current, which distinguishes it from conventional potassium channel blockers such as sotalol and dofetilide, which block only IKr. Azimilide is being developed to prolong the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in patients with and without structural heart disease. Azimilide is also being studied for its role in prevention of sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Preclinical and clinical studies indicate that azimilide prolongs cardiac refractory period in a dose-dependent manner, as manifested by increases in action potential duration, QTc interval, and effective refractory period. Azimilide does not affect PR or QRS interval and minimally affects hemodynamic properties such as blood pressure and heart rate. Its in vivo effects appear to be rate-independent and are maintained under ischemic or hypoxic conditions, properties of potential clinical significance. Azimilide has shown excellent efficacy (>85%) in suppressing supraventricular arrhythmias in a variety of dog models. It also suppressed complex ventricular arrhythmias in infarcted dogs and, in a sudden death cardiac model, decreased mortality. Azimilide pharmacokinetics are very predictable. The drug is completely absorbed, and the extent of absorption is not affected by food. It can be administered once daily. Clinical data suggest that dose adjustments of azimilide are not required for age, gender, hepatic or renal function, or concomitant use of digoxin or warfarin. Azimilide has a good safety profile in open-label safety studies in >800 supraventricular arrhythmia patients, most with structural heart disease. The incidence of serious adverse events, including torsade de pointes, is low. The rate of patient withdrawal from long-term studies is also encouragingly low. Unlike amiodarone, azimilide has shown no evidence of pulmonary or ocular toxicity. Azimilide is expected to provide a unique new therapy for the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death when Phase III clinical trials are complete and safety and efficacy are confirmed.

The azimilide post-infarct survival evaluation (ALIVE) trial

The AzimiLide post-Infarct surVival Evaluation (ALIVE) trial is a new clinical trial using an innovative design to examine the potential of azimilide, a novel type of antiarrhythmic, for improving survival in post myocardial infarction (MI) patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Azimilide is the first of a unique class of antiarrhythmic drugs that blocks both slow and rapid components of the delayed rectifier potassium currents in human myocardium. Preclinical studies have shown the drug to be effective in reducing cardiac tachyarrhythmias, even under ischemic conditions. Currently, azimilide is in Phase III trials for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. The ALIVE study design is based on lessons learned from the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials (CAST), the Survival With Oral d-Sotalol (SWORD) trial, and the European Myocardial Infarction Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT) and identifies recent post-MI patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. The hypothesis underlying this trial is that azimilide will improve survival in this patient population. The ALIVE trial is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial that will overcome the shortcomings of previous antiarrhythmic trials by using left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability as predictors to target a post-MI patient population at high risk of sudden death. The major inclusion criteria for the study are adult patients of either gender with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 15-35% who have had a recent MI (within 6-21 days). Additional stratification will be based on patients with heart rate variability < or = 20 U (heart rate variability index). Exclusion criteria include factors that may predispose a patient to nonarrhythmia-induced death or to low risk of sudden cardiac death caused by arrhythmia. Sample size is based on the assumption that the all-cause mortality rate (the primary endpoint) for 1 year in placebo patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (heart rate variability < or = 20 U) is 15% and that azimilide will decrease all-cause mortality by at least 45% in these patients. The trial consists of 3 groups-patients receiving 75 mg azimilide orally each day, patients receiving 100 mg azimilide orally each day, and patients receiving placebo. No dose adjustments for age, gender, renal or hepatic failure, or concomitant use of warfarin or digoxin are thought necessary with azimilide. Enrollment for the trial is expected to continue for 24 months, and treatment is scheduled to be administered for a 1-year follow-up period.