Optimizing platelet P2Y12 inhibition for patients undergoing PCI

Analysing responses to aspirin and clopidogrel by measuring platelet thrombus formation under arterial flow conditions

High residual platelet aggregability and circulating platelet-monocyte aggregates in patients administered aspirin and clopidogrel are associated with ischaemic vascular events. To determine the relevance of these factors with residual thrombogenicity, we measured platelet thrombus formation using a microchip-based flow-chamber system in cardiac patients receiving aspirin and/or clopidogrel, and evaluated its correlation with agonist-inducible platelet aggregation and platelet-monocyte aggregates. Platelet thrombus formation was analysed by measuring flow pressure changes due to the occlusion of micro-capillaries and was quantified by calculating AUC10 (area under the flow pressure curve). The growth and stability of platelet thrombi that formed inside microchips at shear rates of 1000, 1500, and 2000 s-1 were markedly reduced in patients receiving aspirin and/or thienopyridine compared to healthy controls (n=33). AUC10 values of aspirin therapy patients (n=20) were significantly lower and higher than those of healthy controls and dual antiplatelet therapy patients (n=19), respectively, and showed relatively good correlations with collagen-induced platelet aggregation and platelet-monocyte aggregates at 1000 and 1500 s-1 (r s >0.59, p<0.01). In contrast, AUC10 in dual antiplatelet therapy patients was significantly correlated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation at all examined shear rates (r s >0.59, p<0.01), but did not correlate with collagen-induced aggregation. Aspirin monotherapy patients with high residual platelet thrombogenicity also exhibited significant elevations in both collagen-induced platelet aggregation and platelet-monocyte aggregates. Our results, although preliminary, suggest that residual platelet thrombogenicity in aspirin-treated patients is associated with either collagen-induced platelet aggregation or circulating platelet-monocyte aggregates, but it is predominantly dependent on ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Assessment of platelet function: Laboratory and point-of-care methods

In the event of blood vessel damage, human platelets are promptly recruited on the site of injury and, after their adhesion, activation and aggregation, prevent blood loss with the formation of a clot. The consequence of abnormal regulation can be either hemorrhage or the development of thrombosis. Qualitative and/or quantitative defects in platelets promote bleeding, whereas the residual reactivity of platelets, despite antiplatelet therapies, play an important role in promoting arterial thrombotic complications. Platelet function is traditionally assessed to investigate the origin of a bleeding syndrome, to predict the risk of bleeding prior surgery or during pregnancy or to monitor the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in thrombotic syndromes that, now, can be considered a new discipline. “Old” platelet function laboratory tests such as the evaluation of bleeding time and the platelet aggregation analysis in platelet-rich plasma are traditionally utilized to aid in the diagnosis and management of patients with platelet and hemostatic disorders and used as diagnostic tools both in bleeding and thrombotic diathesis in specialized laboratories. Now, new and renewed automated systems have been introduced to provide a simple, rapid assessment of platelet function including point of care methods. These new methodologies are also suitable for being used in non-specialized laboratories and in critical area for assessing platelet function in whole blood without the requirement of sample processing. Some of these methods are also beginning to be incorporated into routine clinical use and can be utilized as not only as first panel for the diagnosis of platelet dysfunction, but also for monitoring anti-platelet therapy and to potentially assess risk of both bleeding and/or thrombosis.

Variable effect of P2Y12 inhibition on platelet thrombus volume in flowing blood

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention receive aspirin and P2Y12 ADP receptor inhibitors to reduce thrombotic complications. The choice of methodology for monitoring the effects of treatment and assessing its efficacy is still a topic of debate. We evaluated how decreased P2Y12 function influences platelet aggregate (thrombus) size measured ex vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used confocal videomicroscopy to measure in real time the volume of platelet thrombi forming upon blood perfusion over fibrillar collagen type I at a wall shear rate of 1500 s(-1). The average volume was significantly smaller in 31 patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (19) or ticlopidine (12) than in 21 controls, but individual values were above the lower limit of the normal distribution, albeit mostly within the lower quartile, in 61.3% of cases. Disaggregation of platelet thrombi at later perfusion times occurred frequently in the patients. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, reflecting P2Y12 inhibition, was also decreased in the patient group, and only 22.6% of individual values were above the lower normal limit. We found no correlation between volume of thrombus formed on collagen fibrils and level of P2Y12 inhibition, suggesting that additional and individually variable factors can influence the inhibitory effect of treatment on platelet function.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of platelet thrombus formation in flowing blood reflects the consequences of antiplatelet therapy in a manner that is not proportional to P2Y12 inhibition. Combining the results of the two assays may improve the assessment of thrombotic risk.

An anti-von Willebrand factor aptamer reduces platelet adhesion among patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel in an ex vivo shear-induced arterial thrombosis

The von Willebrand factor (vWF) aptamer, ARC1779 that blocks the binding of vWF A1-domain to platelet glycoprotein 1b (GPIb) at high shear, may deliver a site-specific antithrombotic effect. We investigated the efficiency of ARC1779 on platelet function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on double antiplatelet therapy. Blood from patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel and from normal volunteers was treated ex vivo with ARC1779 or abciximab, either prior to perfusion (pretherapy) or 10 minutes following the initiation of perfusion (posttherapy) on damaged arteries. Under pre- but not posttherapy, platelet adhesion was significantly reduced by ARC1779 at 83 and 250 nmol/L and by abciximab (100 nmol/L) versus placebo (4.8, 3.8, and 2.9 vs 7.3 platelets × 10(6)/cm(2), P < .05). In contrast to abciximab, ARC1779 did not significantly affect platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression, and platelet-leukocyte binding. These proof-of-concept data may constitute the framework for randomized clinical investigations of this novel antiplatelet therapy among patients with CAD.

Ticagrelor: a novel oral antiplatelet agent

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of ticagrelor and to discuss implications for use in the elderly.

DATA SOURCE

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE from 1966 to July 2010 using the MESH terms and key words AZD6140, ticagrelor, P2Y12 receptor antagonist. The search was limited to studies in English language with human subjects.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Randomized controlled clinical trials were reviewed. References that were deemed relevant to pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic studies of P2Y₁₂ antagonists and their historical background were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ticagrelor is the first reversible oral P2Y₁₂ antagonist currently undergoing Food and Drug Administration review for approval. The advantages of ticagrelor over clopidogrel are a more rapid onset of action, offset, and reversibility at the platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor site. In the Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes trial, ticagrelor reduced the incidence of death as a result of cardiovascular causes, with no increase in major bleeding or bleeding related to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) compared with clopidogrel. Subgroup analyses suggested that elderly patients may benefit more from ticagrelor than from clopidogrel. However, the increase in non-CABG-related bleeding and unique adverse events may limit ticagrelor's use in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

The use of ticagrelor in the elderly should be determined on a case-by-case basis. More studies need to be conducted prior to establishing a role in therapy for the elderly.

Antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a critical review of the 2007 AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines and beyond

Antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the 2007 PCI treatment guidelines were published by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, new clinical evidence has emerged, expanding our understanding of antiplatelet use and potentially affecting the treatment guidelines. For example, clinical trial results prompted a Science Advisory to recommend that dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel be used for longer periods-up to 1 year in patients who receive bare metal stents and at least 1 year in patients receiving drug-eluting stents. New trial results have also emerged regarding the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. This article reviews the current recommendations for antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients, recent trial results, newly developed agents, ongoing clinical trials, and the future direction of antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergo PCI.

Metabolism and disposition of the thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel in humans

Ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel are thienopyridine prodrugs that inhibit adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP)-mediated platelet aggregation in vivo. These compounds are converted to thiol-containing active metabolites through a corresponding thiolactone. The 3 compounds differ in their metabolic pathways to their active metabolites in humans. Whereas ticlopidine and clopidogrel are metabolized to their thiolactones in the liver by cytochromes P450, prasugrel proceeds to its thiolactone following hydrolysis by carboxylesterase 2 during absorption, and a portion of prasugrel's active metabolite is also formed by intestinal CYP3A. Both ticlopidine and clopidogrel are subject to major competing metabolic pathways to inactive metabolites. Thus, varying efficiencies in the formation of active metabolites affect observed effects on the onset of action and extent of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). Knowledge of the CYP-dependent formation of ticlopidine and clopidogrel thiolactones helps explain some of the observed drug-drug interactions with these molecules and, more important, the role of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel. The lack of drug interaction potential and the absence of CYP2C19 genetic effect result in a predictable response to thienopyridine antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel. Current literature shows that greater ADP-mediated IPA is associated with significantly better clinical outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Considerable variability in platelet activity among patients with coronary artery disease in response to an increased maintenance dose of clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Variable platelet response to clopidogrel has been widely observed. Studies have shown that the mean aggregation response to clopidogrel can be changed by a higher maintenance dose. However, these studies have not focused on individual changes.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the platelet function effects of increasing the maintenance clopidogrel dose from 75 to 150 mg/day with a focus on inter-individual response.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Twenty patients with known coronary artery disease receiving 75 mg/day clopidogrel were recruited and given 150 mg/day clopidogrel for 30 days, then returned to 75 mg/day for an additional 30 days. Platelet function was assessed through light-transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days.

RESULTS

Mean platelet inhibition was significantly improved with the increased maintenance dose when measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (P2Y12 reaction units: 191+/-15 vs. 158+/-17, P=0.013), but not when measured by LTA (LTA-adenosine diphosphate 5: 40+/-3 vs. 36+/-3, P = 0.11; LTA-adenosine diphosphate 20: 50+/-3 vs. 47+/-3, P = 0.23). However, only 50% of individual patients experienced improved platelet inhibition, as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, when treated with the increased maintenance dose. Furthermore, poor baseline platelet response did not predict improved responsiveness at the increased dose.

CONCLUSION

Despite changing the population's mean antiplatelet response, an increased maintenance dose of clopidogrel did not improve antiplatelet response in a substantial number of patients; nor did baseline platelet function predict response to a higher maintenance dose.

Aspirin resistance: an update

Aspirin resistance (AR) still lacks a universally accepted definition, but it may be discussed as either a laboratory phenomenon or a clinical presentation. Laboratory resistance is mainly defined as abnormal platelet response to aspirin, whereas the clinical manifestation is the failure of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events. Although there is evidence of an association, it appears that a laboratory abnormality in platelet function is not the only risk factor for the clinical manifestation of AR. Therapies for primary and secondary prevention of AR still need to be elucidated, but there are some data to suggest that in an acute episode of aspirin failure because of AR, different therapeutic interventions need to be considered.

Catheter-Based Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

September 2007 marked the 30-year anniversary of the first human percutaneous coronary intervention, an index event that changed the course of modern-day cardiovascular care. Before that first procedure, adult invasive cardiology focused on diagnostic angiography as well as hemodynamic assessment of structural heart disease. Since that initial procedure, percutaneous coronary intervention has become the most frequently performed coronary revascularization procedure worldwide. Several factors have been responsible for this dramatic paradigm shift, the most prominent being identification of opportunities for technical improvement and the application of innovation and investigation in concert with colleagues, professional societies, and industry. These approaches will continue to be of paramount importance as new technologies are brought to bear on an increasingly broader group of patients with cardiovascular disease.

The role of aspirin in cardiovascular prevention: implications of aspirin resistance

Aspirin is well recognized as an effective antiplatelet drug for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk of cardiovascular events. However, most patients receiving long-term aspirin therapy still remain at substantial risk of thrombotic events due to insufficient inhibition of platelets, specifically via the thromboxane A2 pathway. Although the exact prevalence is unknown, estimates suggest that between 5.5% and 60% of patients using this drug may exhibit a degree of "aspirin resistance," depending upon the definition used and parameters measured. To date, only a limited number of clinical studies have convincingly investigated the importance of aspirin resistance. Of these, few are of a sufficient scale, well designed, and prospective, with aspirin used at standard doses. Also, most studies do not sufficiently address the issue of noncompliance to aspirin as a frequent, yet easily preventable cause of resistance to this antiplatelet drug. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of aspirin resistance, discussing its definition, prevalence, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches. Moreover, the clinical implications of aspirin resistance are explored in various cardiovascular disease states, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, and other similar disorders where platelet reactivity is enhanced.