Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy

MEG for Greater Sensitivity and More Precise Localization in Epilepsy

Magnetoencephalography is the noninvasive measurement of miniscule magnetic fields produced by brain electrical currents, and is used most fruitfully to evaluate epilepsy patients. While other modalities infer brain function indirectly by measuring changes in blood flow, metabolism, and oxygenation, magnetoencephalography measures neuronal and synaptic function directly with submillisecond temporal resolution. The brain's magnetic field is recorded by neuromagnetometers surrounding the head in a helmet-shaped sensor array. Because magnetic signals are not distorted by anatomy, magnetoencephalography allows for a more accurate measurement and localization of brain activities than electroencephalography. Magnetoencephalography has become an indispensable part of the armamentarium at epilepsy centers.

Magnetoencephalography for localizing and characterizing the epileptic focus

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is the noninvasive measurement of the miniscule magnetic fields produced by electrical currents flowing in the brain-the same neuroelectric activity that produces the EEG. MEG is one of several diagnostic tests employed in the evaluation of patients with epilepsy, but without the need to expose the patient to any potentially harmful agents. MEG is especially important in those being considered for epilepsy surgery, in whom accurate localization of the epileptic focus is paramount. While other modalities infer brain function indirectly by measuring changes in blood flow, metabolism, oxygenation, etc., MEG, as well as EEG, measures neuronal and synaptic function directly and, like EEG, MEG enjoys submillisecond temporal resolution. The measurement of magnetic fields provides information not only about the amplitude of the current but also its orientation. MEG picks up the magnetic field from neuromagnetometers surrounding the head in a helmet-shaped array of sensors. Clinical whole-head systems currently have 200-300 magnetic sensors, thereby offering very high resolution. The magnetic signals are not distorted by anatomy, because magnetic susceptibility is the same for all tissues, including the skull. Hence, MEG allows for a more accurate measurement and localization of brain activities than does EEG. Because one of its primary strengths is the ability to precisely localize electromagnetic activity within brain areas, MEG results are always coregistered to the patient's MRI. When combined in this way with structural imaging, it has been called magnetic source imaging (MSI), but MEG is properly understood as a clinical neurophysiologic diagnostic test. Signal processing and clinical interpretation in magnetoencephalography require sophisticated noise reduction and computerized mathematical modeling. Technological advances in these areas have brought MEG to the point where it is now part of routine clinical practice. MEG has become an indispensable part of the armamentarium at epilepsy centers where MEG laboratories are located, especially when patients are MRI-negative or where results of other structural and functional tests are not entirely concordant.

Accuracy of MEG in localizing irritative zone and seizure onset zone: Quantitative comparison between MEG and intracranial EEG

BACKGROUND

We conducted the study to examine accuracy of the magnetoencephalography (MEG) spike source localization in presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with refractory focal epilepsy who were candidates for two-stage surgery with long-term intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG) monitoring were enrolled. Interictal MEG recordings with simultaneous scalp EEG were obtained within 7days before the ICEEG electrode implantation. The location of each MEG spike source was quantitatively compared with ICEEG spike foci (focal area of interictal spikes) and ICEEG ictal foci (earliest cortical origin of seizures). Gyral-width concordance and sublobar concordance were also determined for all MEG spike sources. Gyral-width concordance was defined by distance of 15mm or less between MEG spike sources and ICEEG spike foci or ICEEG ictal foci.

RESULTS

Visual analyses of the MEG traces of all 10 patients revealed 292 spikes (29.2±24.0 per patient). Spike yield of the MEG was similar to the simultaneously recorded scalp EEG. MEG spike sources were closely located with ICEEG spike foci (distance: 9.3±10.8mm). Clustered MEG spike sources were even closer to ICEEG spike foci (distance: 7.3±6.4mm). MEG spike sources, even clustered ones, were less concordant with ICEEG ictal foci and had significant longer distance from ICEEG ictal foci (distance: 21.5±15.6mm for all sources, 19.7±13.7mm for clustered sources). Gyral-width concordance rate and sublobar concordance rate were also higher with ICEEG interictal spike foci than with ICEEG ictal foci. On the other hand, 53.4% of interictal spike foci from ICEEG were not detected by interictal MEG recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG spike sources, especially clustered ones, from interictal recording could localize the irritative zone of ICEEG with a high accuracy. However, MEG spike sources have relatively poor correlation with seizure onset zone and lower sensitivity in identifying all irritative zones of ICEEG. This limitation should be considered in the interpretation of MEG results.

Magnetoencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an important tool in the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The appropriate utilization and interpretation of MEG studies can increase the proportion of patients who may be able to further pursue surgical evaluation, refine surgical planning, and potentially increase the probability of seizure freedom after surgery. The aim of this paper is to provide the reader with a comprehensive but accessible guide to MEG, with particular emphasis on acquiring a working knowledge of MEG analysis, identifying patient groups that are most likely to benefit, and clarifying the limitations of this technology.

Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations

This article reviews the relative strengths and weaknesses of MEG and EEG source modeling for localization of epileptogenic foci. Proper interpretation of these dipole models requires an appreciation for the limitations of each technique and an understanding of the character of the cortical sources that can generate epileptiform transients identifiable in recordings of spontaneous cerebral activity. MEG is sensitive to smaller sources, is not altered by the skull and scalp, requires a simpler head model, and provides more accurate localization, but it is insensitive to radial sources. EEG requires larger sources, is attenuated and smeared by the skull/scalp, requires a more complicated head model, and provides less accurate localization; however, and most importantly, it is sensitive to all source orientations. In conclusion, the case is made that maximal clinical information is obtained when simultaneous MEG and EEG are both subjected to source modeling, either individually or in a combined fashion.

How somatic cortical maps differ in autistic and typical brains

The comorbidity of 'core characteristics' and sensorimotor abnormalities in autism implies abnormalities in brain development of a general and pervasive nature and atypical organization of sensory cortex. By using magnetoencephalography, we examined the cortical response to passive tactile stimulation of the thumb and index finger of the dominant hand and lip of the individuals with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing persons. The distance between the cortical representations of thumb and the lip was significantly larger in the autism group than in typicals. Moreover, in cortex, the thumb is typically closer to the lip than the index finger. This was not observed in persons with autism. Our findings are arguably the first demonstration of abnormality in sensory organization in the brains of persons with autism.

Pediatric Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Source Imaging

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and magnetic source imaging (MSI) together represent a uniquely powerful functional imaging modality because of their capabilities of directly observing the electrophysiologic activity of neurons with exquisite temporal detail and accurately localizing corresponding neuromagnetic field sources onto high-resolution MR images. These features have and should continue to advance our understanding of the complex spatiotemporal basis of normal and abnormal brain function and development in children. By more clearly delineating and characterizing epileptogenic foci and their relation to eloquent cortex, MSI enables earlier and more effective neurosurgery to be performed, thus resulting in improved seizure outcomes. Although MEG and MSI cannot replace scalp electroencephalography, neuropsychologic testing, and the need for meticulous intraoperative cortical mapping in patients undergoing excision of epileptogenic lesions, their increasing availability should ultimately persuade many clinicians of their key, if not essential, role in the evaluation and treatment of children with epilepsy.

The role of FDG-PET, ictal SPECT, and MEG in the epilepsy surgery evaluation

2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), ictal single-photon-emission computed tomography (ictal SPECT), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) represent three established functional imaging tests that offer unique information toward the localization of epilepsy for surgery evaluation and treatment. When these tests are combined with high-resolution magnetic fresonance imaging (MRI), epilepsy related structure and function disturbances may be localized with a degree of confidence and understanding not possible with electroencephalography (EEG), even ictal recordings with intracranial electrodes, the mainstay of tools for seizure localization. Use of these alternative tests allows an increased percentage of patients to be considered for surgical treatment. In particular, the additional information provided by these techniques has been demonstrated to help those patients with nonlocalizing MRI or extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Studies that address optimal use of these tests (alone and in combination) will build toward the next major advancement in the surgical treatment of epilepsy by allowing better patient selection, less risk, and better surgical outcomes. Ultimately, appropriate use of these tests, combined with more comprehensive functional brain mapping (e.g., with MEG or functional MRI), may lead to completely noninvasive epilepsy surgery evaluation.

Source analysis of interictal spikes in polymicrogyria: Loss of relevant cortical fissures requires simultaneous EEG to avoid MEG misinterpretation

PURPOSE

Multiple source analysis of interictal EEG and MEG spikes was used to identify irritative zones in polymicrogyria (PMG). Spike onset times and source localization were compared between both modalities. PMG is characterized by a marked loss of deep cortical fissures. Hence, differences between EEG and MEG were expected since MEG signals are predominantly generated from tangentially orientated neurons in fissures.

PATIENTS

We studied 7 children and young adults (age 7.5 to 19 years) with localization-related epilepsy and unilateral polymicrogyria (PMG) as defined from anatomical MRI.

METHODS

122-channel whole-head MEG and 32-channel EEG were recorded simultaneously for 25 to 40 min. Using the BESA program, interictal spikes were identified visually and used as templates to search for similar spatio-temporal spike patterns throughout the recording. Detected similar spikes (r > 0.85) were averaged, high-pass filtered (5 Hz) to enhance spike onset, and subjected to multiple spatio-temporal source analysis. Source localization was visualized by superposition on T1-weighted MRI and compared to the lesion.

RESULTS

Nine spike types were identified in seven patients (2 types in 2 patients). Eight out of nine EEG sources and seven MEG sources modeling spike onset were localized within the visible lesion. EEG spike onset preceded MEG significantly in two spike types by 19 and 25 ms. This was related to radial onset activity in EEG while MEG localized propagated activity. In one case, the earliest MEG spike activity was localized to the normal hemisphere while the preceding radial EEG onset activity was localized within the lesion. Distances between EEG and MEG onset sources varied markedly between 9 and 51 mm in the eight spike types with concordant lateralization.

CONCLUSION

Interictal irritative zones were localized within the lesion in PMG comparable to other malformations, e.g., FCD. Discrepancies in MEG and EEG were related to the lack of deep fissures in PMG. In two cases, MEG was blind to the onset of radial interictal spike activity and localized propagated spike activity. In two other cases, MEG localized to the more peripheral parts of the irritative zone. Simultaneous EEG recordings with MEG and multiple source analysis are required to avoid problems of MEG interpretation.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) predicts focal epileptogenicity in cavernomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the irritative epileptic zone in patients with cavernomas by means of magnetoencephalography (MEG).

METHOD

Among 82 patients operated for epilepsy, whose presurgical evaluation had included MEG, histological assessment of the tissue removed had confirmed cavernomas in eight. These eight patients had epilepsy since 18.6 (SD 12.7) years on average. The monitoring lasted about 2.1 (SD 1.3) hours and a median 20.9 (SD 14.3) spikes per hour were recorded. Spontaneous brain activity was recorded by means of a 74 channel dual unit MEG system (Magnes II, 4-D Neuroimaging) with simultaneous EEG recording (31 scalp electrodes). Spike analysis was performed using different source (moving dipole, current density reconstruction) and head models (spherical shells, BEM). Co-registration of neurophysiological and imaging data (MRI) was based upon anatomical landmarks.

RESULTS

In 6/8 patients co-localisation from the cavernoma and epileptic zone was found. In two patients the focus was localised in the parieto-occipital lobe, in three patients in the frontal lobe and in three patients in the temporal lobe. In one case of temporal and one case of frontal lobe focus localisation there was no spatial relationship to the cavernoma.

CONCLUSION

In cases of focal seizures due to a single cavernoma, MEG may precisely delineate the epileptogenic tissue bordering the lesion. In patients with multiple cavernomas or dual pathology, MSI may reveal the complexity of the case, and contribute to the decision about further invasive diagnostics and more sophisticated therapeutic measures. MEG is a promising method for prediction of the epileptic zone in cavernoma related epilepsies, and thus it can contribute to decision making about and planning of epilepsy surgery.

EEG and MEG source analysis of single and averaged interictal spikes reveals intrinsic epileptogenicity in focal cortical dysplasia

PURPOSE

Simultaneous interictal EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were used for noninvasive analysis of epileptogenicity in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). The results of two different approach methods (multiple source analysis of averaged spikes and single dipole peak localization of single spikes) were compared with pre- and postoperative anatomic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PATIENTS

We studied nine children and adolescents (age, 3.5-15.9 years) with localization-related epilepsy and FCD diagnosis based on MRI. Five patients underwent epilepsy surgery, two of them after long-term recording with subdural grid electrodes, and one after intraoperative electrocorticography.

METHODS

The 122-channel whole-head MEGs and 33-channel EEGs were recorded simultaneously for 25 to 40 min. Interictal spikes were identified visually and used as templates to search for similar spatiotemporal spike patterns throughout the recording. With the BESA program, similar spikes (r > 0.85) were detected, averaged, high-pass filtered (5 Hz) to enhance spike onset, and subjected to multiple spatiotemporal source analysis with a multishell spherical head model. Peak activity from single spikes was modeled by single dipoles for the same subset of spikes. Source localization was visualized by superposition on T1-weighted MRI and compared with the lesion identified in T1- and T2-weighted MRI. In the five cases undergoing epilepsy surgery, the results were correlated with invasive recordings, postoperative MRI, and outcome.

RESULTS

In all cases, the analysis of averaged spikes showed a localization of onset- and peak-related sources within the visible lesion for both EEG and MEG. Of the single spikes, 128 (45%; total 284) were localizable at the peak in MEG, and 170 (60%) in EEG. Of these, 91% localized within the lesion with MEG, and 93.5% with EEG. In three of five patients operated on, the resected area included the onset zones of averaged EEG and MEG spike activity. These patients had excellent postoperative outcome, whereas the others did not become seizure free.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent MEG and EEG spike localization in the lesional zone confirmed the hypothesis of intrinsic epileptogenicity in FCD.

Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether MEG is superior to scalp-EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity and to stress the 'con' part in this controversy.

METHODS

Advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques were systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

While MEG and EEG complement each other for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges, EEG offers the advantage of long-term recording significantly increasing its diagnostic yield which is not feasible with MEG. Localization accuracies of EEG and MEG are comparable once inaccuracies for the solution of the forward problem are eliminated. MEG may be more sensitive for the detection of neocortical spike sources. EEG and MEG source localizations show comparable agreement with invasive electrical recordings, can clarify the spatial relationship between the irritative zone and structural lesions, guide the placement of invasive electrodes and attribute epileptic activity to lobar subcompartments in temporal lobe epilepsy and to a lesser extent in extratemporal epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear superiority of MEG over EEG for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity cannot be derived from the studies presently available.

SIGNIFICANCE

The combination of EEG and MEG provides information for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity which cannot be obtained with either technique alone.

High-resolution source imaging in mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between MEG and simultaneous EEG

Magnetic source imaging is claimed to have a high accuracy in epileptic focus localization and may be a guide for epilepsy surgery. Non-lesional mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), the most common form of epilepsy operated on, has different etiologies, which may affect the choice of surgical approach. The authors compared whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) with high-resolution EEG for source identification in MTLE. Nineteen patients with unilateral, nonlesional MTLE underwent a simultaneous 151-channel CTF MEG (CTF Systems, Inc., Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada) and 64-channel EEG recordings with sleep induction. Three independent observers selected spikes from the EEG and MEG recordings separately. Only when there was interobserver agreement (kappa>0.4) on the presence of spikes in recordings were consensus spikes averaged. EEG and MEG equivalent current dipoles (ECD) were then integrated in the head model of the patient reconstructed from MRI. The results were compared with intraoperative electrocorticography findings. Spikes were detected in 32% of MEGs and 42% of EEGs. No patient showed MEG spikes only. Equivalent current dipole modeling correctly localized the source to the temporal lobe in four out of five MEG and three out of eight EEG recordings. MEG localized sources were more superficial and EEG localized sources were deeper. Unfortunately, basal temporal lobe areas were only partially covered by the sensor helmet of the MEG setup. Best correlation between EEG or MEG findings and electrocorticography findings was between horizontal EEG dipole orientation and prominent neocortical spiking; these patients also had a less favorable prognosis. Magnetic source imaging is currently unlikely to alter the surgical management of MTLE. The yield of spikes is too low, and ECD modeling shows only partial correlation with electrocorticography findings. Moreover, the whole-head MEG helmet provides insufficient coverage of the temporal lobe.

Magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic evaluation in patients with cryptogenetic partial epilepsy

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been applied for more than 20 years to the localization of the epileptic focus in partial epilepsies, but correlation with electroencephalographic (EEG) data in homogeneous groups of patients is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our work was to use EEG and MEG for the study of a group of adults and children affected by cryptogenetic partial epilepsy.

METHODS

We analyzed the traces obtained from electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic recordings of 10 patients of ages ranging from 7 to 38 years affected by cryptogenetic partial epilepsy. We evaluated the presence of commonly detected or uniquely detected spikes, and, whenever possible, we used MEG for localization of the epileptic focus.

RESULTS

Three patients showed no epileptic activity during the EEG and MEG sessions. Overall agreement between EEG and MEG (presence of concordant spikes with the same localization shown by both techniques) was obtained in five patients. In one patient the spikes detected by EEG and MEG were different, and in another patient interictal activity was demonstrated exclusively by EEG.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG in this series was not inferior to MEG in terms of spike detection. Combination of EEG and MEG is feasible, better than each technique alone, and may be useful for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of pediatric and adult patients with partial epilepsies.

Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Comparison with scalp EEG recordings

To compare magnetoencephalography (MEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the detection of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we simultaneously recorded MEG and scalp EEG with a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer in 46 TLE patients. We visually searched interictal spikes on MEG and EEG channels and classified them into three types according to their presentation on MEG alone (M-spikes), EEG alone (E-spikes), or concomitantly on both modalities (M/E-spikes). The M-spikes and M/E-spikes were localized with MEG equivalent current dipole modeling. We analyzed the relative contribution of MEG and EEG in the overall yield of spike detection and also compared M-spikes with M/E-spikes in terms of dipole locations and strengths. During the 30- to 40-min MEG recordings, interictal spikes were obtained in 36 (78.3%) of the 46 patients. Among the 36 patients, most spikes were M/E-spikes (68.3%), some were M-spikes (22.1%), and some were E-spikes (9.7%). In comparison with EEG, MEG gave better spike yield in patients with lateral TLE. Sources of M/E- and M-spikes were situated in the same anatomical regions, whereas the average dipole strength was larger for M/E- than M-spikes. In conclusion, some interictal spikes appeared selectively on either MEG or EEG channels in TLE patients although more spikes were simultaneously identified on both modalities. Thus, simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings help to enhance spike detection. Identification of M-spikes would offer important localization of irritative foci, especially in patients with lateral TLE.

MEG and EEG in epilepsy

Both EEG and magnetoencephalogram (MEG), with a time resolution of 1 ms or less, provide unique neurophysiologic data not obtainable by other neuroimaging techniques. MEG has now emerged as a mature clinical technology. While both EEG and MEG can be performed with more than 100 channels, MEG recordings with 100 to 300 channels are more easily done because of the time needed to apply a large number of EEG electrodes. EEG has the advantage of the long-term video EEG recordings, which facilitates extensive temporal sampling across all periods of the sleep/wake cycle. MEG and EEG seem to complement each other for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges, because some spikes can be recorded only on MEG but not on EEG and vice versa. Most studies indicate that MEG seems to be more sensitive for neocortical spike sources. Both EEG and MEG source localizations show excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings, clarify the spatial relationship between the irritative zone and structural lesions, and finally, attribute epileptic activity to lobar subcompartments in temporal lobe and to a lesser extent in extratemporal epilepsies. In temporal lobe epilepsy, EEG and MEG can differentiate between patients with mesial, lateral, and diffuse seizure onsets. MEG selectively detects tangential sources. EEG measures both radial and tangential activity, although the radial components dominate the EEG signals at the scalp. Thus, while EEG provides more comprehensive information, it is more complicated to model due to considerable influences of the shape and conductivity of the volume conductor. Dipole localization techniques favor MEG due to the higher accuracy of MEG source localization compared to EEG when using the standard spherical head shape model. However, if special care is taken to address the above issues and enhance the EEG, the localization accuracy of EEG and MEG actually are comparable, although these surface EEG analytic techniques are not typically approved for clinical use in the United States. MEG dipole analysis is approved for clinical use and thus gives information that otherwise usually requires invasive intracranial EEG monitoring. There are only a few dozen whole head MEG units in operation in the world. While EEG is available in every hospital, specialized EEG laboratories capable of source localization techniques are nearly as scarce as MEG facilities. The combined use of whole-head MEG systems and multichannel EEG in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques is an area of active development and will allow a better noninvasive characterization of the irritative zone in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. Finally, additional information on epilepsy may be gathered by either MEG or EEG analysis of data beyond the usual bandwidths used in clinical practice, namely by analysis of activity at high frequencies and near-DC activity.

Magnetoencephalography in pediatric neurology and in epileptic syndromes

In recent years, great advances in the knowledge of neuromagnetism have permitted the application of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices to the pathophysiologic study of the human brain. In particular, in pediatric neurology, the integration of biomagnetism with magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques for medical imaging have allowed for precise neuromagnetic measurements of the human brain. The more frequently used technique is magnetoencephalography. Recent data have illustrated the usefulness of magnetoencephalography in mapping activity of sensory and motor areas and in studying the spatiotemporal pattern of brain activation specific to somatosensory function. Moreover, magnetoencephalography is an important tool to localize epileptic activity; magnetic source imaging superimposes magnetoencephalographic localizations on the magnetic resonance imaging and yields improved spatial resolution as compared with surface electroencephalography. The role of magnetoencephalography in evaluating patients with epilepsy continues to evolve; in fact, it seems to be very useful in the localization of the epileptogenic zone in patients with partial epilepsy. This application of magnetoencephalography is essential in the selection of epileptic children candidates to surgical treatment of seizures.

Consistency of interictal and ictal onset localization using magnetoencephalography in patients with partial epilepsy

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the spatial accuracy of interictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the primary epileptogenic focus in comparison with alternative MEG-derived estimates such as ictal onset recording or sensory mapping of the periphery where seizures manifest.

METHODS

During this retrospective study of 12 patients with epilepsy who had undergone successful magnetic source (MS) imaging with the aid of a dual 37-channel biomagnetometer as well as simultaneous MEG/electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, ictal events were observed in five patients and quantitative comparisons of interictal spike and ictal seizure onset source localizations were made. In the eight patients who had presented with sensorimotor seizure, source localization of cortical sites concordant with seizure foci was determined using somatosensory functional mapping, and the results were quantitatively compared with interictal spike source localizations. Interictal spike sources demonstrated on MEG localized to the same region as the corresponding ictal event or somatosensory source localizations. The mean distance between the ictal foci and interictal spike sources was 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm. Results of functional somatosensory mapping in patients with sensorimotor seizures demonstrated that seizure sources consistently colocalized with interictal MEG spike sources, with a mean distance of 1.5 +/- 0.4 cm. No systematic directional bias was observed. Interictal sources tended to be tightly clustered, and the mean ellipsoid volume, defined by one standard deviation of the source spatial coordinates, was 1 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

Interictal spike localizations on MEG were concordant with ictal and, where relevant, functional somatosensory mapping localizations. These findings support the interpretation of interictal spikes on MEG as a useful and effective noninvasive method for localizing primary seizure foci.

Non-supervised spatio-temporal analysis of interictal magnetic spikes: comparison with intracerebral recordings

OBJECTIVE

Our main goal was to evaluate the accuracy of an original non-supervised spatio-temporal magnetoencephalography (MEG) localization method used to characterize interictal spikes generators.

METHODS

MEG and stereotactic intracerebral recordings (stereo-electro-encephalographic exploration, SEEG) data were analyzed independently in 4 patients. MEG localizations were performed with and without anatomical constraints.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1326 interictal spikes recorded using MEG. For each patient, 2-3 typical source patterns were described. These source configurations were compared with SEEG. SEEG findings and MEG spatio-temporal localization results were remarkably coherent in our 4 patients. Most of the MEG patterns were similar to interictal SEEG patterns from a spatio-temporal point of view.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to evaluate the usefulness of our non-invasive localization method. This approach described correctly the part of the epileptogenic network involved in the generation of interictal events. Our results demonstrate the potential of MEG in the non-invasive spatio-temporal characterization of generators of interictal spikes.

Detection and significance of focal, interictal, slow-wave activity visualized by magnetoencephalography for localization of a primary epileptogenic region

OBJECT

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a novel noninvasive diagnostic tool used to determine preoperatively the location of the epileptogenic zone in patients with epilepsy. The presence of focal slowing of activity recorded by electroencephalography (EEG) is an additional indicator of an underlying pathological condition in cases of intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). In the present study the authors examined the significance of focal, slow-wave and interictal spike activity detected using MEG in 29 patients who suffered from MTLE that was not associated with structural brain lesions.

METHODS

All patients underwent resective surgery after MEG and EEG monitoring. Equivalent single-dipole modeling was applied to focal low-frequency magnetic activity (LFMA) and interictal paroxysmal activity. Lateralized LFMA was defined as trains of rhythmic activity over the temporal area, with frequencies lower than 7 Hz, which were easily distinguished from background activity. Lateralized LFMA was found in 17 patients (58.6%); it always occurred on the side ipsilateral to the side of resection and displayed a maximum amplitude over the temporal area. Dipolar sources of magnetic flux computed during slow-wave trains were found in the majority of cases in the posterior superior temporal region and, occasionally, in mesial temporal structures that were subsequently resected. With respect to lateralization there was never disagreement between LFMA and MEG interictal spike sources. Thus, in patients with MTLE that is not associated with a mass lesion LFMA is topographically related to the epileptogenic area and, therefore, has value for reliable determination of the side and, possibly, the location of this area.

CONCLUSIONS

Although focal slowing of EEG background activity is generally considered to be a nonspecific sign of functional disturbance, interictal LFMA in patients with MTLE should be conceptualized as a distinct electrographic phenomenon that is directly related to the epileptogenic abnormality. Analyzing the interictal MEG distribution of LFMA and sharp activity improves the diagnostic utility of MEG in patients with suspected TLE who are undergoing surgical evaluation.

Two magneto-encephalographic epileptic foci did not coincide with the electrocorticographic ictal onset zone in a patient with temporal lobe epilepsy

To evaluate the usefulness and limitations of magneto-encephalography (MEG) for epilepsy surgery, we compared 'interictal' epileptic spike fields on MEG with ictal electrocorticography (ECoG) using invasive chronic subdural electrodes in a patient with intractable medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) associated with vitamin K deficiency intracerebral hemorrhage. A 19-year-old male with an 8-year history of refractory complex partial seizures, secondarily generalized, and right hemispheric atrophy and porencephaly in the right frontal lobe on MRI, was studied with MEG to define the interictal paroxysmal sources based on the single-dipole model. This was followed by invasive ECoG monitoring to delineate the epileptogenic zone. MEG demonstrated two paroxysmal foci, one each on the right lateral temporal and frontal lobes. Ictal ECoG recordings revealed an ictal onset zone on the right medial temporal lobe, which was different from that defined by MEG. Anterior temporal lobectomy with hippocampectomy was performed and the patient has been seizure free for two years. Our results indicate that interictal MEG does not always define the epileptogenic zone in patients with MTLE.

Magnetoencephalography and magnetic source imaging in children

Magnetoencephalography is a technique that detects the magnetic fields associated with the intracellular current flow within neurons, unlike electroencephalography, which measures extracellular volume currents. Superconducting quantum interference devices are used to amplify these very small magnetic field signals. Magnetic source imaging is the combination of functional data derived from magnetoencephalographic recordings coregistered with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The utility of magnetic source imaging lies in the combination of the submillisecond temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography with the precise anatomic images provided by magnetic resonance imaging. As such, magnetic source imaging is a useful tool for noninvasive localization of the epileptogenic zone in children who are candidates for epilepsy surgery. Similarly, using magnetoencephalographic recordings with evoked and event-related potentials, magnetic source imaging holds great promise as a noninvasive method for precise localization of somatosensory, motor, language, visual, and auditory cortex. Finally, magnetic source imaging is proving a valuable research tool in the investigation of epilepsy, head trauma, brain plasticity, and disorders of language, memory, cognition, and executive function in children.

Magnetoencephalography in focal epilepsy

The introduction of whole-head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has led to a major breakthrough in the MEG evaluation of epilepsy patients. MEG localizations estimates of the interictal spike zone showed excellent agreement with invasive electrical recordings and were useful to clarify the spatial relationship of the irritative zone and structural lesions. MEG appears to be especially useful for study of patients with neocortical epilepsy, and helped to guide the placement of subdural grid electrodes in patients with nonlesional epilepsies. MEG could differentiate between patients with mesial and lateral temporal seizure onset. Spike propagation in the temporal lobe and the spatio-temporal organization of the interictal spike complex could be studied noninvasively. MEG was useful to delineate essential brain regions before surgical procedures adjacent to the central fissure. MEG appears to be more sensitive than scalp EEG for detection of epileptic discharges arising from the lateral neocortex, whereas only highly synchronized discharges arising from mesial temporal structures could be recorded. A major limitation of MEG has been the recording of seizures because long-term recordings cannot be performed on a routine basis with the available technology. Because MEG and EEG yield both complementary and confirmatory information, combined MEG-EEG recordings in conjunction with advanced source modeling techniques should improve the noninvasive evaluation of epilepsy patients and further reduce the need for invasive procedures.

Neuromagnetic recordings in temporal lobe epilepsy

The introduction of whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems facilitating simultaneous recording from the entire brain surface has established MEG as a clinically feasible method for the evaluation of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In mesial TLE, two types of MEG spike dipoles could be identified: an anterior vertical and an anterior horizontal dipole. Dipole orientations can be used to attribute spike activity to temporal lobe subcompartments. Whereas the anterior vertical dipole is compatible with epileptic activity in the mediobasal temporal lobe, the anterior horizontal dipole can be explained by epileptic activity of the temporal tip cortex. In nonlesional TLE, medial and lateral vertical dipoles were found which could distinguish between medial and lateral temporal seizure onset zones as evidenced from invasive recordings. In lesional TLE, MEG could clarify the spatial relationship of the structural lesion to the irritative zone. Evaluation of patients with persistent seizures after epilepsy surgery may represent another clinical important application of MEG because magnetic fields are less influenced than electric fields by the prior operation. Simultaneous MEG and invasive EEG recordings indicate that epileptic activity restricted to mesial temporal structures cannot reliably be detected on MEG and that an extended cortical area of at least 6 to 8 cm2 involving also the basal temporal lobe is necessary to produce a reproducible MEG signal. In lateral neocortical TLE MEG seems to be more sensitive than scalp-EEG which further underlines the potential role of MEG for the study of nonlesional TLE. Whole-head MEG therefore can be regarded as a valuable and clinically relevant noninvasive method for the evaluation of patients with TLE.

Magnetoencephalographic analysis of periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges (PLEDs)

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the spatial and temporal distribution of the electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern termed 'periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges' (PLEDs), we performed magnetoencephalography (MEG) to analyze PLEDs in a patient with a right parietal metastasis associated with meningeal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

A 37-channel biomagnetometer was used to simultaneously record the EEG and MEG. Equivalent current dipole (ECD) source localization was calculated based on a single-dipole model and mapped onto a magnetic resonance image. Single-photon emission computed tomography with technetium-99-hexamethyl-propyleneamine oxime (HMPAO-SPECT study) was also performed during both presence and absence of PLEDs according to an EEG monitor.

RESULTS

By EEG the PLEDs, predominantly right-sided, consisted of a typical negative triphasic spike followed by a slow negative wave. By MEG the PLEDs had a sequence with 3 distinct components. ECDs in the 3 components were localized to the cortex around the lesion, although exact localization and dipole direction varied between components. HMPAO-SPECT demonstrated hypoperfusion of the lesion and adjacent cortex during both quiescence and appearance of PLEDs.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that PLEDs originated from the hypoperfused cortex surrounding the lesion.

A comparison of magnetoencephalography, MRI, and V-EEG in patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and relative contribution of several diagnostic methods [ictal and interictal scalp and intracranial EEG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetoencephalography (MEG)] in identifying the epileptogenic zone for resection.

METHODS

This was a prospective study using a masked comparison-to-criterion standard. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with refractory partial epilepsy from two university comprehensive epilepsy programs were studied. Patients who were evaluated for and underwent epilepsy surgery were recruited. The main outcome measure was the efficacy of each diagnostic method to identify the resected epileptogenic zone, when referenced to surgical outcome.

RESULTS

MEG (52%) was second only to ictal intracranial V-EEG in predicting the epileptogenic zone for the entire group of patients who had an excellent surgical outcome (seizure free or rare seizure). In a subanalysis, for patients who had temporal lobe surgery, this same relation was seen (MEG, 57%, ictal intracranial V-EEG, 62%). With extratemporal resection, ictal (81%) and interictal (75%) intracranial EEG were superior to MEG (44%) in predicting the surgery site in those patients with an excellent outcome. Finally, for all patients who had a good surgical outcome, MEG (52%) was better than ictal (33%) or interictal (45%) scalp VEEG in predicting the site of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that MEG is a very promising diagnostic method and raise the possibility that it may obviate the need for invasive EEG in some cases or reduce the length of scalp EEG evaluation in others.

Confirmation of two magnetoencephalographic epileptic foci by invasive monitoring from subdural electrodes in an adolescent with right frontocentral epilepsy

PURPOSE

To report our evaluation of interictal two epileptic spike fields on magnetoencephalography (MEG) by using invasive intracranial monitoring in a patient without lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A 15-year-old left-handed boy with a 9-year history of refractory simple partial seizures, secondarily generalized, and a normal MRI, was studied with MEG to define magnetic spike sources, followed by invasive intracranial monitoring with subdural electrodes to delineate the epileptogenic zone and eloquent function pursuant to focal cortical excision.

RESULTS

MEG demonstrated two spike foci on the right middle frontal and inferior rolandic areas adjacent to the sensory area. Ictal recordings during prolonged invasive monitoring from subdural electrodes revealed two epileptogenic zones in the same locations as those defined by MEG. Focal cortical excision was performed of each epileptogenic zone. The patient has been seizure free for 24 months without neurologic deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic source imaging is a valuable adjunct in the planning of subdural grid placement in epilepsy surgery, particularly in patients in whom conventional imaging fails to reveal a lesion.

Intrinsic epileptogenicity of focal cortical dysplasia as revealed by magnetoencephalography and electrocorticography

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is often associated with severe partial epilepsy. In this study, we performed magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electrocorticogrsphy (ECoG) on four patients with FCD-associated epilepsy to confirm the 'intrinsic' epileptogenicity of FCD. In all patients, we determined the three-dimensional locations of the magnetic sources of the interictal paroxysmal activities by a single dipole model, and then the estimated dipole localization was superimposed on the magnetic resonance image. The dipole clusters were located in the T2-prolonged lesions, namely in the FCD lesions themselves. All patients underwent surgery for their medically intractable epilepsy, and the acute and/or chronic ECoG were thereafter recorded. Either frequent or continuous paroxysmal activities were recorded from the ECoG electrodes which were placed over the surface of the FCD lesion, while few paroxysmal activities were observed on the normal appearing adjacent cortex. Intraoperative depth recordings were performed in a patient with the needle electrode inserted into the FCD lesion and they revealed these paroxysmal foci to be located not on the cortical surface but at a depth of 15 mm from the cortical surface where both abnormal giant neurons and bizarre large eosinophilic cells (so-called balloon cells) were also prominently observed on the postoperative histological sections. Following a lesionectomy combined with the removal of the underlying white matter, three patients demonstrated a favorable seizure outcome. Our findings thus suggest the FCD lesions to be highly and intrinsically epileptogenic lesions.

Magnetic source imaging and reactivity to rhythmical stimulation in tuberous sclerosis

The present study combined functional magnetoencephalography (MEG) and anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) information in three patients affected by tuberous sclerosis and partial epilepsy. MEG recordings were performed during both spontaneous and visual evoked activity. The former showed a large variety of complexes whose spatial and temporal distribution suggested different neuronal populations acting simultaneously in the same focal district. When these data were integrated with MRI images (magnetic source imaging, MSI) there was agreement in the definition of tubers and extension of the epileptogenic area. Furthermore, cortical reactivity to rhythmical stimulation was studied with trains of visual stimuli according to a recently proposed frequency responsiveness procedure (FRP). As compared to normal controls, a large 6 Hz activity was observed during the pause after a non-resonant stimulation. This altered resonance property may indicate a disturbed primary sensory processing notwithstanding a preserved associated processing. These results show that neuronal malfunctioning in tuberous sclerosis complex patients may not be restricted to the area of cortical tubers, but can also affect functionally correlated regions.

Three-dimensional localization of subclinical ictal activity by magnetoencephalography: correlation with invasive monitoring

BACKGROUND

Although magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides accurate information on the spatial distribution and temporal patterns of the "interictal" epileptic activities, it is interictal in nature and therefore also prone to all the problems associated with interictal data.

METHODS

We investigated the subclinical "ictal" epileptic activity with a 37-channel, large-array biomagnetometer and mapped the data onto a three-dimensional image in a patient with intractable frontal lobe epilepsy. Dipole source localization was calculated based on magnetic fields for both the interictal and subclinical ictal activities.

RESULTS

The current dipoles of the interictal MEG spikes (MEG irritative zone) were revealed to be scattered in the left anterior frontal lobe, whereas that of the subclinical ictal onset (MEG subclinical ictal onset zone) was surrounded by the interictal dipole cluster. The dipole source localization of the propagating activities was not calculated with a single dipole model. The MEG subclinical ictal onset zone correlated well with the ictal onset zone subsequently recorded by invasive subdural electrophysiological monitoring. After multiple subpial transection of the deduced epileptogenic area, a dramatic reduction of the seizures occurred.

CONCLUSION

These results illustrate the potential of MEG for localizing the epileptogenic foci with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Magnetoencephalography in partial epilepsy: clinical yield and localization accuracy

The goals of this study were to determine (1) the yield of magnetoencephalography (MEG) according to epilepsy type, (2) if MEG spike sources colocalize with focal epileptogenic pathology, and (3) if MEG can identify the epileptogenic zone when scalp ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fail to localize it. Twenty-two patients with mesial temporal (10 patients), neocortical temporal (3 patients), and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (9 patients) were studied. A 37-channel biomagnetometer was used for simultaneously recording MEG with EEG. During the typical 2-3-hour MEG recording session, interictal epileptiform activity was observed in 16 of 22 patients. MEG localization yield was greater in patients with neocortical epilepsy (92%) than in those with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (50%). In 5 of 6 patients with focal epileptogenic pathology, MEG spike sources were colocalized with the lesions. In 11 of 12 patients with nonlocalizing (ambiguous abnormalities or normal) MRI, MEG spike sources were localized in the region of the epileptogenic zone as ultimately defined by all clinical and EEG information (including intracranial EEG). In conclusion, MEG can reliably localize sources of spike discharges in patients with temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy. MEG sometimes provides noninvasive localization data that are not otherwise available with MRI or conventional scalp ictal EEG.

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields from primary sensorimotor cortex in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

The present study evaluated neurophysiologic function of the primary sensorimotor cortex in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. A 122-channel magnetometer, which allowed studies of the somatosensory system in millimeter and millisecond precision, was used to record somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to median nerve stimulation from 10 patients and their matched control subjects. In both patients and controls, the somatosensory evoked magnetic fields from primary sensorimotor area typically consisted of N20m, P35m, and P60m deflections. In the patients, N20m was significantly delayed, whereas P35m peaked earlier than in the control subjects. The source strengths for N20m and P35m were greater in the patients than in the controls. Both deflections showed a significant positive correlation with the disease duration: the sources were stronger in the older patients than in the younger ones. P60m deflections were normal or reduced in the patients. The results indicated increased thalamocortical excitability in the sensorimotor cortex in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Possibilities and limitations of magnetic source imaging of methohexital-induced epileptiform patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy patients

The usefulness of MEG-based techniques in lateralizing and localizing the epileptogenic area was investigated in the present study. Spontaneous and methohexital-induced spikes were studied in a group of 15 patients with temporomesial epilepsy using a 37-channel neuromagnetometer. The accuracy of the magnetic source imaging was compared to the results of electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings. Differences of drug-induced spike densities in the MEG recordings between both sides confirmed a similar lateralizing power of the MEG and ECoG recordings. Source location analyses based on a moving dipole model resp. a rotating dipole model were performed using a spherical head model. After subdivision of the volume of each patient's head, 8 cm3 cubicles containing at least 3 source locations were projected onto the individual MRI scan and resulted in source locations within or close to the presurgically defined primary epileptogenic area only in 3 of the 15 patients. Spike induction by methohexital has the advantage of shortening the recording period as compared to recordings of interictal epileptiform discharges. However, the correlation analyses of spike densities from MEG and ECoG recordings and the source location analyses from MEG recordings indicate that spike generated in deep temporomesial structures may escape the MEG registration.

Magnetic source imaging of abnormal low-frequency magnetic activity in presurgical evaluations of epilepsy

PURPOSE

Regional cortical dysfunction associated with epileptogenic activity was predicted from interictal localized abnormal low frequency neuromagnetic activity (ALFMA) using Magnetic Source Imaging (MSI). ALFMA can be detected in patients who show no interictal spikes.

METHODS

A large array biomagnetometer was used in a blinded, rapid screening protocol. The MSI procedure required no alteration in epileptic medications. MSI results were compared with the presumed epileptogenic region as determined by a consensus of standard techniques, which included MR and electroclinical monitoring.

RESULTS

One or more sites of localized abnormality were detected by MSI ALFMA in 29 of the 33 epileptic patients. ALFMA mapped with MSI showed a 48.5% specificity with respect to the presumed epileptogenic region. MSI ALFMA was in agreement with the final consensus as often as was ictal noninvasive video EEG monitoring, and was exceeded in specificity overall only by invasive ictal video EEG monitoring, which was required for conventional localization in 21 of the 33 patients tested with MSI.

CONCLUSIONS

ALFMA measurements with MSI may augment the array of noninvasive methods used for reaching a consensus for epilepsy surgery.

Potential contribution of bilateral magnetic source imaging to the evaluation of epilepsy surgery candidates

The current procedures that are used to evaluate candidates for epilepsy surgery are time-consuming, costly, and often invasive. Magnetic source imaging (MSI), the combination of magnetoencephalography and anatomic imaging modalities, has shown promise as an efficient noninvasive means of localizing and characterizing seizure sources for possible resection. However, MSI has been limited by the inability to conduct simultaneous bilateral monitoring. In this study, a newly developed dual-magnetometer system was employed to record bilaterally the interictal activity in 30 candidates for epilepsy surgery. A standard monitoring protocol that included concurrent electroencephalographic recording and required a 2- to 3-hour examination period for each patient was developed. As a first step in a series of studies, the resultant MSI indications were compared with the information available from standard magnetic resonance imaging and concurrent electroencephalographic results. In 83% of the cases, this MSI protocol provided new information about the location of interictal epileptic activity that could be directive for subsequent patient care. Based on these results, it seems that MSI may become a cost-effective early step in epilepsy surgery evaluation. To continue the development on this basis, a study intended to validate the accuracy of MSI indicated by comparison with invasive electroencephalography has been initiated.

Spike dipole analysis using SEP dipole as a marker

In dipole localization analysis many problems remain which affect the accuracy of localization. We performed dipole estimation of spikes and SEP components in identical patients. The subjects are 8 cases of benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BCECS), and two cases of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In 8 of 10 cases, we also investigated dipoles using a 3-layer model in addition to a single layer (homogenous) model.

RESULTS

1) In 8 cases of BCECS, the spike dipoles were concentrated at the central line near the SEP dipoles, at a slightly fronto-lateral-downward position to the latter. The spike dipoles seemed to be situated at the bottom of the sensory cortex. 2) In two cases of TLE, the spike dipoles were located at the same coronal plane with the SEP dipoles, and more deeply seated mesially. The spike dipoles seemed to be at the bottom of the mesial temporal area. 3) Using 3-layer models, both the spike dipoles and the SEP dipoles located more superficially, while conserving the positional relationship with each other.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to more accurately define spike dipoles by using the SEP dipole as a marker.