Anticonvulsant efficacy of ADCI (5-aminocarbonyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine) after acute and chronic dosing in mice

Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-emerging role of AMPA and kainate subtypes of ionotropic glutamate receptors

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) mediate the majority of excitatory neurotransmission and are implicated in various neurological disorders. In this review, we discuss the role of the two fastest iGluRs subtypes, namely, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and kainate receptors, in the pathogenesis and treatment of Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Although both AMPA and kainate receptors represent promising therapeutic targets for the treatment of these diseases, many of their antagonists show adverse side effects. Further studies of factors affecting the selective subunit expression and trafficking of AMPA and kainate receptors, and a reasonable approach to their regulation by the recently identified novel compounds remain promising directions for pharmacological research.

Assessment of drug-drug interactions between moxonidine and antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock seizure test in mice

Hypertension is a common comorbid condition with epilepsy, and drug interactions between antihypertensive and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are likely in patients. Experimental studies showed that centrally active imidazoline compounds belonging to antihypertensive drugs can affect seizure susceptibility. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of moxonidine, an I₁ -imidazoline receptor agonist, on the anticonvulsant efficacy of numerous AEDs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, valproate, phenytoin, oxcarbazepine, topiramate and lamotrigine) in the mouse model of maximal electroshock. Besides, the combinations of moxonidine and AEDs were investigated for adverse effects in the passive avoidance task and the chimney test. Drugs were administered intraperitoneally (ip). Moxonidine at doses of 1 and 2 mg/kg ip did not affect the convulsive threshold. Among tested AEDs, moxonidine (2 mg/kg) potentiated the protective effect of valproate against maximal electroshock. This interaction could be pharmacodynamic because the brain concentration of valproate was not significantly changed by moxonidine. The antihypertensive drug did not cause adverse effects when combined with AEDs. This study shows that moxonidine may have a neutral or positive effect on the anticonvulsant activity of AEDs in patients with epilepsy. The enhancement of the anticonvulsant action of valproate by moxonidine needs further investigations to elucidate potential mechanisms involved.

An assessment of zonisamide as an anti-epileptic drug

A brief review of epilepsy as a disease, anti-epileptic drugs and methods of evaluation of anti-epileptic drugs are presented as a background for assessment of zonisamide, which has been approved by the FDA as add-on therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation in adults. Chemically, zonisamide is classified as a sulphonamide and is unrelated to other anti-epileptic drugs. The mode of action of zonisamide remains unclear, but likely mechanisms are blockade of sodium and T-type calcium channels. It is also shown to have some neuroprotective effect against hypoxia and ischaemia. It has a liner pharmacokinetics with excellent oral bioavailability. Zonisamide has been approved for use in Japan for ten years prior to approval in USA and Europe. Clinical experience with zonisamide in Japan has documented its efficacy in the treatment of partial seizures (partial-onset generalised tonic-clonic, simple partial and/or complex partial seizures) and to a more variable extent, generalised tonic-clonic, generalised tonic (mainly seen in symptomatic generalised epilepsies including Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome) and compound/combination seizures. The efficacy and safety was confirmed in trials conducted in USA and Europe in adults as well as children. Zonisamide compares favourably with other newly introduced drugs and has the potential for development as a monotherapy for epilepsy.

An assessment of levetiracetam as an anti-epileptic drug

A brief review of epilepsy as a disease, anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) and methods of evaluation of AEDs are presented as a background for the assessment of levetiracetam which has been approved by the FDA as add-on therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation in adults. The exact mechanism of action of levetiracetam is not known but its action differs from that of other anti-epileptic drugs. A specific binding site for levetiracetam has been identified and is possibly related to anticonvulsant activity. Levetiracetam offers an effective and broad spectrum treatment of epileptic seizures, partial as well as generalised epilepsy. Levetiracetam has been shown to be effective in genetic and kindled animal models of epilepsy and against chemoconvulsant-induced partial epileptic seizures. Levetiracetam has a near perfect pharmacokinetic profile, with rapid absorption following oral administration, excellent bioavailability, quick attainment of steady-state concentrations, linear kinetics and minimal plasma protein binding. Levetiracetam does not interact with commonly used drugs and other AEDs. In recent Phase III clinical trials, the responder rate was 39.4 - 42.1% on 3000 mg dose, compared with placebo rates of 10.9 - 16.7%. Levetiracetam has a favourable safety profile and the most frequently reported adverse events were somnolence, asthenia and dizziness. Overall, levetiracetam is considered to have several advantages over current AEDs.

An assessment of rufinamide as an anti-epileptic in comparison with other drugs in clinical development

This article evaluates rufinamide, a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) in Phase III development. This review is done against the background of therapeutic challenges of epilepsy, old established AEDs, newly introduced AEDs and AEDs in clinical development. Pharmacological properties of 12 AEDs in clinical trials (Phases I - III) are compared: ADCI, AWD 131-138, DP-VPA, ganaxolone, levetiracetam, losigamone, pregabalin, remacemide hydrochloride, retigabine, rufinamide, soretolide and TV1901. One of these, levetiracetam has been approved in the USA and is waiting approval in other countries. The protective index of rufinamide, as shown in rodent models of epilepsy, is much higher than that of most common AEDs. Features which make it a desirable AED are: (i) a broad spectrum of anti-epileptic actions including both partial and symptomatic generalised epilepsy; (ii) a statistically significant reduction in seizure frequency in clinical trials; (iii) efficacy and safety shown in a broad range of age groups including children and the elderly; (iv) rapid oral absorption enabling quick titration to effective dose and (v) a benign adverse event profile. Most of the events did not lead to discontinuation in clinical trials. These features offer considerable advantages over the existing anti-epileptic drugs. It is one of the two drugs in development which have reached Phase III and is expected to be approved by the year 2001 - 2002.

The anticonvulsant SGB-017 (ADCI) blocks voltage-gated sodium channels in rat and human neurons: comparison with carbamazepine

PURPOSE

SGB-017 (ADCI) is a novel anticonvulsant that blocks both voltage-activated sodium channels and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor-gated channels. Results by Rogawski et al. suggested that SGB-017 produces its anticonvulsant action primarily by inhibition of NMDA-receptor channels. However, SGB-017 is effective in several animal models of epilepsy that are unresponsive to NMDA antagonists. These results indicate that block of NMDA-receptor channels is not the only mechanism contributing to its anticonvulsant activity. Thus the effects of SGB-017 on neuronal sodium channels were investigated.

METHODS

Whole cell voltage-clamp techniques were used to record sodium currents in freshly dissociated rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG) and hippocampal neurons and cultured human NT2 neurons. The effects of SGB-017 on the amplitude of sodium currents, elicited by a depolarizing pulse to 0 mV from different holding potentials, were measured and compared with those of carbamazepine (CBZ).

RESULTS

SGB-017 inhibited sodium currents in rat SCG and hippocampal neurons with a similar potency to CBZ. Like CBZ, the inhibition of sodium channels by SGB-017 was voltage dependent. Its median inhibitory concentration (IC50) for inhibition of sodium channels at depolarized holding potentials is similar to that for its inhibition of NMDA receptor channels. In human hNT2 neurons, SGB-017 was more potent than CBZ at inhibiting sodium currents.

CONCLUSIONS

SGB-017 produces its anticonvulsant activity by blocking both sodium- and NMDA-receptor channels in a voltage- and use-dependent manner. The combination of these two mechanisms of action makes SGB-017 an effective AED in several different animal models of epilepsy.

Morphine tolerance and dependence in mice with history of repeated exposures to NMDA receptor channel blockers

Mice were subjected to two successive treatment protocols: first with NMDA receptor channel blockers (14 days, once a day) and second with morphine (5 mg/kg, 8 days, once a day). Treatment with the higher doses of dizocilpine (1 mg/kg), memantine (30 mg/kg), and MRZ 2/576 (30 mg/kg) upon discontinuation revealed only minor behavioral abnormalities attributable to the state of withdrawal. Following repeated administration of low-dose morphine, tolerance to morphine analgesia developed in mice preexposed to dizocilpine (1 mg/kg but not 0.3 mg/kg) but not memantine (10 and 30 mg/kg), MRZ 2/579 (10 and 30 mg/kg), or saline. There were no signs of morphine dependence in any treatment group. Overall, the present study found only minor effects of the subchronic administration of high doses of NMDA receptor channel blockers, suggesting that clinical use of NMDA receptor channel blockers such as memantine will not be accompanied by increased propensity to induction of morphine tolerance and dependence.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the fourth Eilat conference (EILAT IV)

The Fourth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) was held at the Royal Beach Hotel, Eilat, Israel, from 6th to 10th September 1998. Epileptologists and scientists from 20 countries attended the conference, which was held to discuss a number of issues in drug development, including outcome assessment in epilepsy (long-term efficacy, quality of life, safety), cost-effectiveness, an update on drugs in development, a progress report on recently marketed AEDs, and controversies in strategies for drug development. This review focuses on drugs in development and recently marketed AEDs. Drugs in development include ADCI, AWD 131-138, DP16, ganaxolone (CCD 1042), levetiracetam (ucb L059), losigamone, pregabalin (isobutyl GABA [CI-1008]), remacemide hydrochloride, retigabine (D-23129), rufinamide (CGP 33101), soretolide (D2916), TV1901, and 534U87. New information on the safety and efficacy of recently marketed drugs (felbamate, fosphenytoin, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide) and of a new antiepileptic device, the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP), has become available. This paper summarizes the presentations made at the conference.

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of monotherapy felbamate doses of 1,200-6,000 mg/day in subjects with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Felbamate (FBM) pharmacokinetic parameters, safety and tolerability in the dose range of 1,200-6,000 mg/day were assessed in two open-label studies with similar designs.

METHODS

In study A, newly diagnosed subjects with epilepsy receiving FBM monotherapy at a starting dose of 1,200 mg/day (400 mg/three times daily, t.i.d.) and increased 1,200 mg/day, if tolerated, at 14-day intervals to 3,600 mg/day were investigated. In study B, epilepsy subjects with prior FBM monotherapy exposure received ascending FBM doses in five consecutive 14-day periods with a starting dose of 3,600 mg/day (1,200 mg t.i.d.) FBM. In each successive period, if FBM was well tolerated, the dose was increased by 600 mg/day to a maximum of 6,000 mg/day (2,000 mg t.i.d.).

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates maximum observed concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUCtau) Ctrough, and Cav showed a linear dependence to dose above the 1,200-6,000 mg/day FBM dose range (F-tests; p < 0.0001) with apparent clearance (Cl/kg) and Tmax (time to Cmax) independent of dose. When AUCtau, Cmax and Ctrough were adjusted for dose, there were no significant differences between the dosing periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The data establish that plasma concentrations of FBM are linear with respect to dose to 6,000 mg/day. In addition, FBM was safely administered at these doses for periods as long as 14 days to epileptic subjects with prior exposure to FBM. FBM-naive subjects appeared to report more adverse experiences (generally of mild to moderate severity) than did subjects with prior FBM exposure.

Dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects of low-affinity uncompetitive NMDA antagonists

The dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects of a variety of channel blocking (uncompetitive) N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists were examined in rats trained to discriminate dizocilpine (0.17 mg/kg, i.p) from saline in a two-lever operant procedure. The dissociative anesthetic-type NMDA antagonists dizocilpine (ED50 0.05 mg/kg), phencyclidine (ED50 3.4 mg/kg) and ketamine (ED50 14 mg/kg) showed complete substitution without producing significant decreases in response rates, whereas dexoxadrol (ED50 4.3 mg/kg) also produced complete substitution with a concomitant decrease (35%) in response rate. Similarly, the low-affinity antagonist memantine resulted in complete substitution (ED50 9.7 mg/kg) at doses that significantly reduced (68%) the response rate. All other low-affinity antagonists resulted in either partial or no substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of dizocilpine at doses that significantly decreased average response rates. These include (ED50 values in parentheses) remacemide (29 mg/kg), the remacemide metabolite 1,2-diphenyl-2-propylamine (ARL 12495) (14 mg/kg), phencylcyclopentylamine (25 mg/kg), dextromethorphan (46 mg/kg), (+/-)-5-aminocarbonyl-10,11-dihydro -5H-dibenzo-[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine (ADCI; no substitution) and levoxadrol (no substitution). We conclude that low-affinity uncompetitive NMDA antagonists have discriminative stimulus properties distinct from dissociative anesthetic-type uncompetitive NMDA antagonists. The lowest-affinity antagonists show virtually no substitution for dizocilpine, whereas the relatively more potent low-affinity antagonists (such as memantine) exhibit greater substitution, but complete substitution is obtained only at rate-reducing doses.