A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effect of vigabatrin on in vivo parameters of hepatic microsomal enzyme induction and on the kinetics of steroid oral contraceptives in healthy female volunteers

Vigabatrin-associated brain abnormalities on MRI in tuberous sclerosis complex patients with infantile spasms: are they preventable?

Background

Vigabatrin (VGB) is currently the most widely prescribed first-line medication for individuals with infantile spasms (IS) and especially for those with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), with demonstrated efficacy. Meanwhile, its adverse events, such as vigabatrin-associated brain abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; VABAM), have also been widely reported.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to observe the occurrences of VABAM in patients with IS caused by TSC (IST) and further explore the associated risk factors.

Methods

Children with IS receiving VGB were recruited from our institution; clinical, imaging, and medication data were collected. Cerebral MRI was reviewed to determine the occurrence of VABAM. Group comparisons (IS caused by TSC and other etiologies) were performed; subgroup analyses on IST were also performed. Next, a retrospective cohort study of children taking VGB was conducted to explore risk/protective factors associated with VABAM.

Results

The study enrolled 172 children with IS who received VGB. VABAM was observed in 38 patients (22.1%) with a peak dosage of 103.5 ± 26.7 mg/kg/day. Subsequent analysis found the incidence of VABAM was significantly lower in the 80 patients with IST than in the 92 patients with IS caused by other etiologies (10% versus 32.6%, p-value < 0.001). In subgroup analyses within the IST cohort, VABAM was significantly lower in children who received concomitant rapamycin therapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the 172 IS children showed that treatment with rapamycin was the independent factor associated with a lower risk of VABAM; similar results were observed in the survival analysis.

Conclusion

The incidence of VABAM was significantly lower in IST patients. Further research is needed to examine the mechanisms that underlie this phenomenon and to determine if treatment with rapamycin may reduce the risk of VABAM.

The Pharmacology and Toxicology of Third-Generation Anticonvulsant Drugs

Epilepsy is a neurologic disorder affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide, or about 0.7% of the population [1]. Thus, the use of anticonvulsant drugs in the treatment of epilepsy is common and widespread. There are three generations of anticonvulsant drugs, categorized by the year in which they were developed and released. The aim of this review is to discuss the pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and adverse events of the third generation of anticonvulsant drugs. Where available, overdose data will be included. The pharmacokinetic properties of third-generation anticonvulsant drugs include relatively fewer drug-drug interactions, as well as several unique and life-threatening adverse events. Overdose data are limited, so thorough review of adverse events and knowledge of drug mechanism will guide expectant management of future overdose cases. Reporting of these cases as they occur will be necessary to further clarify toxicity of these drugs.

Evaluation of the Effect of Tofacitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptive Steroids in Healthy Female Volunteers

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor. Tofacitinib metabolism is primarily mediated by cytochrome P450 3A4. This phase 1 randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover study (NCT01137708) evaluated the effect of tofacitinib 30 mg twice daily on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of combination oral contraceptives ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). EE and LN were administered as a single Microgynon 30® tablet (30 μg EE and 150 μg LN) to 19 healthy women. In the presence of tofacitinib, the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞ ) increased by 6.6% and 0.9% for EE and LN, respectively. Maximal plasma concentrations decreased by 10.4% for EE and increased by 12.2% for LN when coadministered with tofacitinib. The 90% confidence intervals for the adjusted geometric mean ratios for AUC∞ fell within the 80%-125% region for both EE and LN. Mean half-life was similar in the presence and absence of tofacitinib: 13.8 and 13.3 hours, respectively, for EE; 25.9 and 25.4 hours, respectively, for LN. Tofacitinib had no clinically relevant net inhibitory or inductive effect on the pharmacokinetics of EE and LN. Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest dose adjustments of oral contraceptive drugs containing EE or LN when coadministered with tofacitinib.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of coadministration of lacosamide and an oral contraceptive (levonorgestrel plus ethinylestradiol) in healthy female volunteers

PURPOSE

To determine whether the antiepileptic drug lacosamide affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a combined oral contraceptive (OC; ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg plus levonorgestrel 0.15 mg).

METHODS

This was an open-label trial in healthy female volunteers. Eligible women entered cycle 1 of the trial on the first day of menstruation. Cycle 1 was a medication-free, run-in phase of approximately 28 days to confirm that normal ovulation occurred. Volunteers with confirmed ovulation entered the subsequent cycle and started taking OCs. After establishing ovulation suppression (defined as progesterone serum concentration <5.1 nm on day 21 of the menstrual cycle) in volunteers taking the OCs in cycle 2, lacosamide 400 mg/day was administered concomitantly in the subsequent cycle (cycle 3). The pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum steady-state plasma drug concentration (Cmax ), and time to maximum concentration (tmax ) were measured for the OC components and lacosamide.

KEY FINDINGS

A total of 37 volunteers completed cycle 1, and 32 completed cycle 2. In each of the 31 volunteers who completed the trial (through cycle 3), pharmacodynamic assessment showed progesterone serum concentration was <5.1 nm on day 21 of cycle 2, when the OC was administered alone, and on day 21 of cycle 3, when lacosamide was administered concomitantly. The AUC of ethinylestradiol alone versus together with lacosamide was 1,067 ± 404 versus 1,173 ± 330 pg h/ml. Corresponding values of Cmax were 116.9 ± 48.8 versus 135.7 ± 28.6 pg/ml. For levonorgestrel, the AUC alone was 74.2 ± 21.4 versus 80.9 ± 18.5 ng h/ml with lacosamide. Corresponding values of Cmax were 6.7 ± 1.9 versus 7.4 ± 1.5 ng/ml. The AUC and Cmax point estimates and almost all 90% confidence intervals (except for Cmax of ethinylestradiol) for ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (with and without lacosamide) were within the conventional bioequivalence range, and no relevant changes in tmax were observed for ethinylestradiol (1.5 ± 0.6 h alone vs. 1.4 ± 0.7 h with lacosamide) or for levonorgestrel (1.5 ± 1.0 h alone vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 h with lacosamide). Lacosamide pharmacokinetics were consistent with those observed in previous studies of lacosamide alone, with values for AUC of 113.5 ± 20.7 μg h/ml, Cmax of 13.8 ± 2.2 μg/ml, and tmax of 1.1 ± 0.4 h.

SIGNIFICANCE

Lacosamide and an OC containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel have low potential for drug-drug interaction; therefore, coadministration of the two drugs is unlikely to result in contraceptive failure or loss of seizure control.

Antiepileptic drug interactions - principles and clinical implications

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used as long-term adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in epilepsy and other indications and consist of a group of drugs that are highly susceptible to drug interactions. The purpose of the present review is to focus upon clinically relevant interactions where AEDs are involved and especially on pharmacokinetic interactions. The older AEDs are susceptible to cause induction (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) or inhibition (valproic acid), resulting in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the serum concentration of other AEDs, as well as other drug classes (anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosupressants). Conversely, the serum concentrations of AEDs may be increased by enzyme inhibitors among antidepressants and antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs (as macrolides or isoniazid) and decreased by other mechanisms as induction, reduced absorption or excretion (as oral contraceptives, cimetidine, probenicid and antacides). Pharmacokinetic interactions involving newer AEDs include the enzyme inhibitors felbamate, rufinamide, and stiripentol and the inducers oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Lamotrigine is affected by these drugs, older AEDs and other drug classes as oral contraceptives. Individual AED interactions may be divided into three levels depending on the clinical consequences of alterations in serum concentrations. This approach may point to interactions of specific importance, although it should be implemented with caution, as it is not meant to oversimplify fact matters. Level 1 involves serious clinical consequences, and the combination should be avoided. Level 2 usually implies cautiousness and possible dosage adjustments, as the combination may not be possible to avoid. Level 3 refers to interactions where dosage adjustments are usually not necessary. Updated knowledge regarding drug interactions is important to predict the potential for harmful or lacking effects involving AEDs.

Managing epilepsy in women of childbearing age

Epilepsy affects the menstrual cycle, aspects of contraception, fertility, pregnancy and bone health in women. It is common for seizure frequency to vary throughout the menstrual cycle. In ovulatory cycles, two peaks can be seen around the time of ovulation and in the few days before menstruation. In anovulatory cycles, there is an increase in seizures during the second half of the menstrual cycle. There is also an increase in polycystic ovaries and hyperandrogenism associated with valproate therapy. There are no contraindications to the use of non-hormonal methods of contraception in women with epilepsy. Non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) [valproate, benzodiazepines, ethosuximide, levetiracetam, tiagabine and zonisamide] do not show any interactions with the combined oral contraceptive (OC). There are interactions between the combined OC and hepatic microsomal-inducing AEDs (phenytoin, barbiturates, carbamazepine, topiramate [dosages>200 mg/day], oxcarbazepine) and lamotrigine. Pre-conception counselling should be available to all women with epilepsy who are considering pregnancy. Women with epilepsy should be informed about issues relating to the future pregnancy, including methods and consequences of prenatal screening, fertility, genetics of their seizure disorder, teratogenicity of AEDs, folic acid and vitamin K supplements, labour, breast feeding and care of a child. During pregnancy, the lowest effective dose of the most appropriate AED should be used, aiming for monotherapy where possible. Recent pregnancy databases have suggested that valproate is significantly more teratogenic than carbamazepine, and the combination of valproate and lamotrigine is particularly teratogenic. Most pregnancies in women with epilepsy are without complications, and the majority of infants are delivered healthy with no increased risk of obstetric complications in women. There is no medical reason why a woman with epilepsy cannot breastfeed her child. The AED concentration profiled in breast milk follows the plasma concentration curve. The total amount of drug transferred to infants via breast milk is usually much smaller than the amount transferred via the placenta during pregnancy. However, as drug elimination mechanisms are not fully developed in early infancy, repeated administration of a drug such as lamotrigine via breast milk may lead to accumulation in the infant. Studies have suggested that women with epilepsy are at increased risk of fractures, osteoporosis and osteomalacia. No studies have been undertaken looking at preventative therapies for these co-morbidities.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between contraceptives and antiepileptic drugs

The occurrence of bi-directional drug interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and combined oral contraceptives (OCs) pose potential risks of un-intended pregnancy and as well as seizure deterioration. It is well established that several of the older AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital), are strong inducers of the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme system, and are associated with increased the risk of contraceptive failure. In addition, it is demonstrated that also some of the newer AEDs, oxcarbazepine and topiramate influence on the pharmacokinetics of OCs, which is thought to be due to a more selective induction of subgroups of the hepatic enzyme system. Estrogens containing OCs induce the glucuronosyltransferase and may reduce the plasma levels and the effect of AEDs cleared by glucuronidation. This has been most intensively studied for lamotrigine but also other AEDs, which undergoes glucuronidation processes, such as valproate and oxcarbazepine, may be affected by OCs. The magnitude of the drug-drug interactions show in general wide inter-individual variability and the change in the elimination rate is often unpredictable and can be influenced by a number of co-variants such as co-medication of other drugs, as well as genetic and environmental factors. It is therefore recommended that change in OC use is assisted by AED monitoring whenever possible.

The impact of antiepileptic drug therapy on steroidal contraceptive efficacy

Women with epilepsy face unique challenges in maintaining steroidal contraceptive efficacy because some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) increase the rate of hepatic metabolism of contraceptive steroids, leading to higher potential for contraceptive failure in this population. Planned pregnancy is of great clinical and social importance for women with epilepsy because of the increased risk of birth defects from fetal exposure to AEDs. Current clinical guidelines for contraceptive management in women with epilepsy provide misleading information by focusing on the estrogen content of the formulation, which regulates the menstrual cycle, rather than on the progestin content of the formulation, which provides contraceptive efficacy. This article reviews studies of AED-contraceptive interaction and misconceptions about maintaining contraceptive efficacy and makes recommendations for contraceptive management in women with epilepsy who receive concomitant AED therapy.

Effect of zonisamide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination ethinyl estradiol-norethindrone oral contraceptive in healthy women

BACKGROUND

Several antiepileptic drugs have clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with oral contraceptives (OCs) that may result in contraceptive failure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of zonisamide on the pharmacokinetics of the individual components of a combination OC (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 0.035 mg and norethindrone [NOR] 1 mg) and on pharmacodynamic variables that may be increased in the event of reduced contraceptive efficacy (concentrations of serum luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and progesterone).

METHODS

This was a single-center, open-label, 1-sequence, crossover study. Healthy, premenopausal women received the combination OC for three 28-day cycles (combination OC for 21 days, followed by placebo for 7 days). Following stabilization on the OC during the first cycle, blood was collected during cycle 2 for the determination of serum EE and NOR profiles (day 14) and serum LH, FSH, and progesterone concentrations (days 13-15). Starting on day 15 of cycle 2, zonisamide was administered orally at 100 mg/d and titrated to a target dose of 400 mg/d. EE and NOR profiles and serum LH, FSH, and progesterone concentrations were obtained again in cycle 3 (in the presence of zonisamide) and compared with those from cycle 2 (in the absence of zonisamide).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven healthy premenopausal women (mean age, 26.1 years [range, 18-51 years]; mean body weight, 65.5 kg [range, 50.4-93.1 kg]; mean height, 165.8 cm [range, 152.4-182.9 cm]) received > or =1 dose of zonisamide. Of the 33 subjects (89.2%) who completed the study, 26 (78.8%) underwent titration to a stable zonisamide dose of 400 mg/d. For EE, the mean (SD) AUC over a 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(tau)) was 1139 (317) pg.h/mL in cycle 2 and 1143 (312) pg.h/mL in cycle 3; the mean C(max) in the respective cycles was 133 (39) and 141 (46) pg/mL. For NOR, the corresponding values were 140 (48) and 159 (46) ng.h/mL for AUC(tau) and 21 (5.4) and 23 (6.7) ng/mL for C(max). The 90% Cls for the geometric mean ratios (cycle 3:cycle 2) for AUC(tau) and C(max) fell within the accepted range for lack of interaction (0.80-1.25). There were no increases in LH, FSH, or progesterone concentrations between cycle 2 and cycle 3.

CONCLUSIONS

In these healthy volunteers, steady-state zonisamide dosing had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of EE or NOR. There was no pharmacodynamic evidence that zonisamide is likely to reduce the contraceptive effectiveness of OCs containing EE and NOR.

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: interactions between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed for long periods, up to a lifetime, and many patients will require treatment with other agents for the management of concomitant or intercurrent conditions. When two or more drugs are prescribed together, clinically important interactions can occur. Among old-generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone are potent inducers of hepatic enzymes, and decrease the plasma concentration of many psychotropic, immunosuppressant, antineoplastic, antimicrobial, and cardiovascular drugs, as well as oral contraceptive steroids. Most new generation AEDs do not have clinically important enzyme inducing effects. Other drugs can affect the pharmacokinetics of AEDs; examples include the stimulation of lamotrigine metabolism by oral contraceptive steroids and the inhibition of carbamazepine metabolism by certain macrolide antibiotics, antifungals, verapamil, diltiazem, and isoniazid. Careful monitoring of clinical response is recommended whenever a drug is added or removed from a patient's AED regimen.

Effect of topiramate or carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol in healthy obese and nonobese female subjects

PURPOSE

To study the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive (OC) containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol during OC monotherapy, concomitant OC and topiramate (TPM) therapy, and concomitant OC and carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy in order to comparatively evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction, which may cause contraceptive failure.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label, five-group study included two 28-day cycles. Five groups of female subjects received oral doses of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 alone (cycle 1) and then concomitant with TPM or CBZ (cycle 2). The treatment groups were group 1, TPM, 50 mg/day; group 2, TPM, 100 mg/day; group 3, TPM, 200 mg/day; group 4, TPM, 200 mg/day (obese women); and group 5, CBZ, 600 mg/day. Group 4 comprised obese women whose body mass index (BMI) was between 30 and 35 kg/m(2). The BMI of the remaining four groups was < or =27 kg/m2.

RESULTS

Coadministration of TPM at daily doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg (nonobese) and 200 mg (obese) nonsignificantly (p > 0.05) changed the mean area under the curve (AUC) of ethinyl estradiol by -12%, +5%, -11%, and -9%, respectively, compared with OC monotherapy. A similar nonsignificant difference was observed with the plasma levels and AUC values of norethindrone (p > 0.05). CBZ (600 mg/day) significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the AUC values of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol by 58% and 42%, respectively, and increased their respective oral clearance by 69% and 127% (p < 0.05). Because CBZ induces CYP 3A-mediated and glucuronide conjugation metabolic pathways, the significant increase in the oral clearance of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone was anticipated.

CONCLUSIONS

TPM, at daily doses of 50-200 mg, does not interact with an OC containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol. The lack of the TPM-OC interaction is notable when it is compared with the CBZ-OC interaction.

Microsomal enzyme induction and clinical aggravation of porphyria: the evaluation of human urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio as the index of hepatic CYP3A4 activity

The clinical aspect of porphyria has been investigated, and it is well known that porphyrinogens such as estrogens and alcohol or other inducers of P450 isoenzymes exacerbate the porphyric state. However, there can be a delay in diagnosing porphyria and a difficulty in selecting safe medicine for it even today. A 21-year-old woman developed epilepsy, disturbance of mental state, and spastic tetraparesis during the convalescent period after acute viral encephalitis. She was diagnosed with porphyria after the fifth hospitalization. In the course of modifying her anticonvulsant regimen, the authors examined the 6beta-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio (6beta-OHF/F) in her urine, which can be the index of hepatic CYP3A4 activity, with electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (ESI/MS/MS). Generalized and partial complex seizures, other neurological signs and symptoms, and laboratory data were improved after modification of her anticonvulsant regimen. This is the first report of evaluating the urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio in a case of porphyria.

Treatment of epilepsy in women of reproductive age: pharmacokinetic considerations

Although epilepsy affects men and women equally, there are many women's health issues in epilepsy, especially for women of childbearing age. These issues, which include menstrual cycle influences on seizure activity (catamenial epilepsy), interactions of contraceptives with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy, teratogenicity and the safety of breastfeeding, challenge both the woman with epilepsy and the many healthcare providers involved in her care. Although the information in the literature on women's issues in epilepsy has grown steeply in recent years, there are many examples showing that much work is yet to be done. The purpose of this article is to review these issues and describe practical considerations for women of childbearing age with epilepsy. The article addresses the established or "first-generation" AEDs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, carbamazepine, ethosuximide and valproic acid) and the "second-generation" AEDs (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide). Although a relationship between hormones and seizure activity is present in many women, good treatment options for catamenial epilepsy remain elusive. Drug interactions between enzyme-inducing AEDs and contraceptives are well documented. Higher dosages of oral contraceptives or a second contraceptive method are suggested if women use an enzyme-inducing AED. Planned pregnancy and counselling before conception is crucial. This counselling should include, but is not limited to, folic acid supplementation, medication adherence, the risk of teratogenicity and the importance of prenatal care. AED dosage adjustments may be necessary during pregnancy and should be based on clinical symptoms, not entirely on serum drug concentrations. Many groups have turned their attention to women's issues in epilepsy and have developed clinical practice guidelines. Although the future holds promise in this area, many questions and the need for progress remain.

Interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraception

An interaction between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the combined oral contraceptive pill was first proposed when the dose of estradiol in the oral contraceptive pill was reduced from 100 to 50 microg. There was a higher incidence of breakthrough bleeding and contraceptive failure among women with epilepsy compared with women in general. Since then, interaction studies have been undertaken to look for possible interactions between AEDs and the combined oral contraceptive pill. Phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, felbamate and topiramate have been shown to increase the metabolism of ethinylestradiol and progestogens. Therefore, if a women is on one of the AEDs and wishes to take the oral contraceptive pill, she will need to take a preparation containing at least 50 microg of ethinylestradiol. Levonorgestrel implants are contraindicated in women receiving these AEDs because of cases of contraceptive failure. It is recommended that medroxyprogesterone injections be given every 10 rather than 12 weeks to women who are receiving AEDs that induce hepatic microsomal enzymes. There are no interactions between the combined oral contraceptive pill, progesterone-only pill, medroxyprogesterone injections or levonorgestrel implants and the AEDs valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, tiagabine, levetiracetam, zonisamide, ethosuximide and the benzodiazepines. Therefore, normal dose contraceptive preparations can be used in patients receiving these AEDs.

Levetiracetam does not alter the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive in healthy women

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate whether levetiracetam, a novel antiepileptic drug (AED), influences the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives.

METHODS

During a run-in phase, 18 healthy female patients received an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol, 0.03 mg, and levonorgestrel, 0.15 mg, for the first 21 days of two consecutive menstrual cycles. In a subsequent double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover treatment phase, subjects received either levetiracetam, 500 mg, or placebo twice daily concomitant with the oral contraceptive. Plasma concentrations of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel were measured on days 14 and 15 of the two treatment periods for the evaluation of the 24-h kinetic parameters, and an additional sample was collected on day 21 to determine the trough plasma concentrations. Serum progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were determined on days 13, 14, 15, and 21 of each cycle of the treatment phase.

RESULTS

The plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel were not statistically different during concomitant treatment with either levetiracetam or placebo. The ratios of the log-transformed geometric mean areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs), maximal (Cmax) and minimal (Cmin) plasma concentrations, and trough concentrations on day 21 (C21) ranged from 99.12 to 99.96% for ethinyl estradiol and from 97.13 to 99.41% for levonorgestrel. The 90% confidence intervals of these ratios were well within the 80 to 125% acceptance range for lack of interaction. Serum progesterone and LH concentrations were fairly constant during the run-in and treatment phases and remained markedly below their respective physiologic levels. Safety and menstrual-bleeding patterns were comparable during levetiracetam and placebo administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam does not affect the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel, and on the basis of serum progesterone and LH levels, it does not affect the contraceptive efficacy.

Observational series on women using the contraceptive Mirena concurrently with anti-epileptic and other enzyme-inducing drugs

CONTEXT

Contraception for women on enzyme-inducing drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To gather preliminary information on the contraceptive efficacy of the hormone-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) Mirena, when used concurrently with enzyme-inducers.

DESIGN

Observational series.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Mirena users on enzyme-inducers were recruited from within the Margaret Pyke Centre and via doctors from throughout the UK. Data were collected systematically on structured questionnaires with particular reference to duration of Mirena use, exposure to pregnancy risk, type of concurrent medication, and reasons for drop-out.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Accidental pregnancies.

RESULTS

To date, 56 women have provided follow-up information. Most took enzyme-inducers for epilepsy. They have accumulated 1454 months of use, of which 1075 months represent exposure to pregnancy risk. Only one apparently true Mirena failure has been documented, representing a failure rate of 1.1 per 100 woman-years (95% CI 0.03-6.25). Including a second pregnancy, probably conceived after the Mirena had been removed,would raise the failure rate to 2.2 per 100 woman-years (95% CI 0.27-8.07). Although 9/30 Mirena removals were followed by re-insertion, only the first segment of use is analysed.

CONCLUSION

As this is a pilot study, no firm conclusions can be drawn, but our preliminary results suggest that any increased pregnancy risk, if it exists, falls within acceptable bounds.

New antiepileptic drugs: review on drug interactions

During the Past decade, nine new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) namely, Felbamate, Gabapentin, Levetiracetam, Lamotrigine, Oxcarbazepine, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Vigabatrin and Zonisamide have been marketed worldwide. The introduction of these drugs increased appreciably the number of therapeutic combinations used in the treatment of epilepsy and with it, the risk of drug interactions. In general, these newer antiepileptic drugs exhibit a lower potential for drug interactions than the classic AEDs, like phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid, mostly because of their pharmacokinetic characteristics. For example, vigabatrin, levetiracetam and gabapentin, exhibit few or no interactions with other AEDs. Felbamate, tiagabine, topiramate and zonisamide are sensitive to induction by known anticonvulsants with inducing effects but are less vulnerable to inhibition by common drug inhibitors. Felbamate, topiramate and oxcarbazepine are mild inducers and may affect the disposition of oral contraceptives with a risk of failure of contraception. These drugs also inhibit CYP2C19 and may affect the disposition of phenytoin. Lamotrigine is eliminated mostly by glucuronidation and is susceptible to inhibition by valproic acid and induction by classic AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and primidone.

Injectable contraception. New and existing options

DMPA and MPA/E2C contraception offer women safe, effective, convenient, and reversible birth control choices. The use of DMPA, a 3-month injectable, is characteristically associated with amenorrhea. Lactating women and women in whom contraceptive doses of estrogen are contraindicated can use this progestin-only birth control method. Return of fertility can be delayed in women discontinuing DMPA to become pregnant. In some cases, the use of DMPA also confers important noncontraceptive and therapeutic benefits. A monthly estrogen/progestin injectable contraceptive, MPA/E2C should appeal to women who are concerned about daily pill taking, who prefer regular cycles to amenorrhea, and who find monthly injections acceptable and accessible. As is true for oral contraceptives, MPA/E2C represents an appropriate choice for women who prefer a rapidly reversible contraceptive. Currently, the proposed contraindications for MPA/E2C parallel those for combined oral contraceptives. As MPA/E2C contraception becomes available for American women, clinicians will learn how to best include this new method among the array of contraceptive choices. By individualizing contraceptive selection, counseling, and management approaches based on the relevant behavioral and medical considerations reviewed herein, clinicians can maximize their patients' success with injectable contraceptives. The more innovative that clinicians, family planning agencies, and insurers are in facilitating access to care (including reinjections), the more women will be able to avail themselves of safe, effective, and reversible methods of contraception. In addition to the physician's office or health clinic, other sites at which women might receive contraceptive injections include employee health clinics, college health clinics, or perhaps the pharmacy where the prescription is filled. Self-administration may become an appropriate option for some users of injectable contraception.

Enzyme induction and inhibition by new antiepileptic drugs: a review of human studies

The aim of this paper is to review a number of new antiepileptic agents (i.e. felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide) for their inducing and/or inhibitory properties in humans, mainly considering the interactions where they are involved as the cause rather than the object of such interactions. Two aspects have been particularly taken into account: the changes or absence of changes in plasma/serum concentrations of concomitant drugs and the direct or indirect evidence of induction, inhibition or lack of effect on the six major human hepatic CYP isozymes (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4), as well as on other CYP isozymes or enzyme systems. Felbamate clearly affects the pharmacokinetics of a number of drugs, generally increasing but also decreasing their concentrations. It induces enzymes such as CYP3A4 and inhibits enzymes such as CYP2C19 and those of the beta-oxidation pathway. Topiramate is not devoid of potential interaction properties: it decreases the plasma concentrations of ethinylestradiol, induces CYP3A4 and inhibits CYP2C19. For oxcarbazepine, no inhibitory, only inductive effects have been observed thus far. Felbamate. topiramate and oxcarbazepine may induce the metabolism of steroidal oral contraceptives. In this respect, tiagabine has been studied at a rather low dose. Pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction seems to exist between lamotrigine and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine appears to be a weak inducer of UGTs, whereas induction of CYP3A4 seems improbable as the compound does not change the concentrations of oral contraceptives or the urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol. Zonisamide has very peculiar pharmacokinetics and an extensive metabolism. Additional information on its enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties would be necessary, as data so far collected on its effect on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs are conflicting. Gabapentin, vigabatrin and in particular levetiracetam appear to be devoid of significant enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between oral contraceptives and second-generation anticonvulsants

Drug interactions between oral contraceptives (OCs) and traditional anticonvulsants have been well described. However, in the past decade, a number of new anticonvulsants have been developed, as well as modifications made in the composition of the OC preparations themselves. Additionally, anticonvulsants are increasingly employed in the therapy of nonseizure-related disorders, placing more women at risk of potential drug interactions that may lead to contraceptive failure. Second-generation anticonvulsants include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. Most have been approved for adjunctive management of seizures refractory to therapy with traditional anticonvulsants. On the basis of available study data in women receiving concomitant OC preparations, gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine and vigabatrin may be administered without significant pharmacokinetic interactions that potentially diminish contraceptive efficacy. However, additional or alternative contraceptive measures, including using OCs with higher estrogen content, are recommended when using felbamate, oxcarbazepine and topiramate, as these agents have demonstrated enzyme-inducing activity leading to reduced plasma steroid concentrations. The effects of zonisamide in women receiving OCs have yet to be reported. It is important to characterise the properties [e.g. substrate and enzyme activity (particularly cytochrome P450 3A4 induction)] of new anticonvulsants and recognise their potential to interfere with OCs. However, a pharmacokinetic interaction does not in itself indicate loss of OC efficacy. Contraceptive failure should be measured by changes in ovarian hormone concentrations, maturation of ovarian follicle(s) or ovulation.

The clinical pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic drugs

Because pharmacokinetics is a major determinant of the magnitude and duration of pharmacologic response, understanding the kinetic properties of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is essential for the correct use of these compounds in clinical practice. After oral administration, absorption is rapid and relatively efficient for the new AEDs, the most notable exception being gabapentin, whose bioavailability decreases with increasing dosage. None of the new AEDs is extensively bound to plasma proteins except for tiagabine, which is over 95% protein-bound. The route of elimination differs to an important extent from one compound to another, and elimination half-lives range from over 30 h for zonisamide to 5-7 h for gabapentin. For all drugs that are metabolized, half-life is shortened and clearance is increased when patients receive concomitant enzyme-inducing agents such as barbiturates, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine metabolism is markedly inhibited by valproic acid, and felbamate may increase the serum levels of most other AEDs. Felbamate, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine may also reduce the efficacy of the contraceptive pill by stimulating its metabolism.

Vigabatrin: a novel therapy for seizure disorders

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of vigabatrin and its role in the management of seizure disorders.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search of English-language literature from January 1993 through January 1999 was conducted using vigabatrin as a search term to identify pertinent studies and review articles. Additional studies were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature. The manufacturer provided postmarketing surveillance data. Priority was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

FINDINGS

Vigabatrin is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase. In controlled clinical trials of vigabatrin add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures, 24-67% of patients achieved a < or =50% reduction in seizure frequency. Data from two comparative trials with carbamazepine monotherapy indicate that vigabatrin monotherapy reduces the frequency of partial seizures in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Vigabatrin also controls infantile spasms, particularly those associated with tuberous sclerosis. Vigabatrin is more effective in patients with partial seizures than in those with generalized seizures. The drug is generally well tolerated. Headache and drowsiness were the most common adverse effects observed in controlled clinical trials; visual field defects, psychiatric reactions, and hyperactivity also have been reported. There are no known clinically significant drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Vigabatrin improves seizure control as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures and may produce therapeutic benefits in the treatment of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin is generally well tolerated, with a convenient administration schedule, a lack of known significant drug interactions, and no need for routine monitoring of plasma concentrations.

Vigabatrin

Vigabatrin (VGB) is a structural analogue of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), which produces its antiepileptic effect by irreversibly inhibiting the degradative enzyme GABA-transaminase. This produces an increase in central nervous system (CNS) GABA levels. VGB is among the few antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that was synthesized with a specific targeted mechanism in mind and was subsequently demonstrated to function by that mechanism. Tiagabine, a GABA reuptake blocker, is the only other "designer drug" among the currently available AEDs. Therefore, VGB is among the few AEDs for which the mechanism of action is well understood. Recently, safety issues have been raised with regard to the use of vigabatrin. This article reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of VGB.