Practice Advisory: The Use of Felbamate in the Treatment of Patients with Intractable Epilepsy. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs, II: Treatment of refractory epilepsy: report of the TTA and QSS Subcommittees of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

PURPOSE

To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) [gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), tiagabine (TGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), levetiracetam (LEV), and zonisamide (ZNS)] in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies.

METHODS

A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles from 1987 to March 2003.

RESULTS

All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. GBP can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and GBP, LTG, OXC, and TPM for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that LTG and TPM also are effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of AED depends on seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, and AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes for which more evidence is necessary.

Pharmacologic treatment of binge eating disorder

OBJECTIVE

To review the findings from pharmacologic trials of binge eating disorder (BED) and to provide guidelines for pharmacologic treatment.

METHODS

The literature was searched for studies of pharmacologic treatment of BED and related conditions, such as nonpurging bulimia nervosa.

RESULTS

Placebo-controlled studies of desipramine, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, dexfenfluramine, sibutramine, and topiramate have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents in the treatment of BED. An open trial of venlafaxine has offered preliminary evidence for the efficacy of this medication. Guidelines for pharmacologic management of BED are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature offers support for the use of agents from three categories of medication (antidepressants, appetite suppressants, and anticonvulsants) in the treatment of BED.

Frontiers in Neuropharmacotherapy Part I: Alzheimer’s Disease and Epilepsy

Cholinesterase inhibitors, and particularly donepezil, are the standard of care in the management of Alzheimer’s disease. Newer agents, such as rivastigmine, galantamine, and metrifonate, provide therapeutic alternatives but have advantages and disadvantages compared with donepezil. Clinical studies and continued research of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease help define the role of both the newer agents and the original cholinesterase inhibitor, tacrine. Therapies with other mechanisms of action, such as estrogen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are also being actively investigated for their effects on cognition. Since 1993, 8 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved by the FDA, including felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, and 3 recently introduced agents, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide. These second-generation agents are generally more tolerable and have fewer drug interactions than traditional antiepileptics, and some provide alternative mechanisms that may be beneficial in the management of refractory epileptic disorders. However, until clinical experience with the newer antiepileptics accumulates and well-designed comparative trials are conducted, a review of individual studies of the safety and efficacy of the newer agents helps provide the basis for treatment decisions. New information regarding traditional therapies, including new formulations and updated treatment guidelines, also assist clinicians in optimizing antiepileptic therapy.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use of the new antiepileptic drugs

Although older generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine, phenytoin and valproic acid continue to be widely used in the treatment of epilepsy, these drugs have important shortcomings such as a highly variable and nonlinear pharmacokinetics, a narrow therapeutic index, suboptimal response rates, and a propensity to cause significant adverse effects and drug interactions. In an attempt to overcome these problems, a new generation of AEDs has been introduced in the last decade. Compared with older agents, some of these drugs offer appreciable advantages in terms of less variable kinetics and, particularly in the case of gabapentin, levetiracetam and vigabatrin, a lower interaction potential. Lamotrigine, topiramate, zonisamide and felbamate protect against partial seizures and a variety of generalized seizure types, vigabatrin is effective against partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) and infantile spasms, while the use of oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and gabapentin is mainly restricted to patients with partial epilepsy (and, in the case of oxcarbazepine, also primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures). Levetiracetam, the latest AED to be introduced, has been found to be effective in partial seizures, but its potentially broader efficacy spectrum remains to be determined in clinical studies. Currently, the main use of new generation AEDs is in the adjunctive therapy of patients refractory to older agents. However, due to advantages in terms of tolerability and ease of use, some of these drugs are increasingly used for first-line management in certain subgroups of patients. Due to serious toxicity risks, felbamate and vigabatrin should be prescribed only in patients refractory to other drugs. In the case of vigabatrin, however, first line use may be justified in infants with spasms.