Debate: Should antiepileptic drugs be stopped after successful epilepsy surgery?

Characterization of anti-seizure medication reduction and discontinuation rates following epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Many patients pursue epilepsy surgery with the hope of reducing or stopping anti-seizure medications (ASMs), in addition to reducing their seizure frequency and severity. While ASM decrease is primarily driven by surgical outcomes and patient preferences, preoperative estimates of meaningful ASM reduction or discontinuation are uncertain, especially when accounting for the various forking paths possible following intracranial EEG (iEEG), including resection, neuromodulation, or even the absence of further surgery. Here, we characterize in detail the ASM reduction in a large cohort of patients who underwent iEEG, facilitating proactive, early counseling for a complicated cohort considering surgical treatment.

METHODS

We identified a multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent iEEG between 2001 and 2022, with a minimum of two years follow-up. The total number of ASMs prescribed immediately prior to surgery, choice of investigation modality, and subsequent surgical treatment were extracted for each patient. Primary endpoints included decreases in ASM counts from preoperative baseline to various follow-up intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients were followed for a median of 6.0 (range 2,22) years after iEEG surgery. Patients undergoing resection saw an average reduction of ∼ 0.5 ASMs. Patients undergoing neuromodulation saw no decrease and trended towards requiring increased ASM usage during long-term follow-up. Only patients undergoing resection were likely to completely discontinue all ASMs, with an increasing probability over time approaching ∼ 10 %. Up to half of resection patients saw ASM decreases, which was largely stable during long-term follow-up, whereas only a quarter of neuromodulation patients saw a reduction, though their ASM reduction decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

With the increasing use of stereotactic EEG and non-curative neuromodulation procedures, realistic estimates of ASM reduction and discontinuation should be considered preoperatively. Almost half of patients undergoing resective surgery can expect to reduce their ASMs, though only a tenth can expect to discontinue ASMs completely. If reduction is not seen early, it likely does not occur later during long-term follow-up. Less than a third of patients undergoing neuromodulation can expect ASM reduction, and instead most may require increased usage during long-term follow-up.

Withdrawal of antiseizure medications after MRI-Guided laser interstitial thermal therapy in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE

This study investigated the success rate of antiseizure medications (ASMs) withdrawal following MRI Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRg-LITT) for extra-temporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE), and identified predictors of seizure recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 27 patients who underwent MRg-LITT for ETLE. Patients' demographics, disease characteristics, and post-surgical outcomes were evaluated for their potential to predict seizure recurrence associated with ASMs withdrawal.

RESULTS

The median period of observation post MRg-LITT was 3 years (range 18 - 96 months) and the median period to initial ASMs reduction was 0.5 years (range 1-36 months). ASMs reduction was attempted in 17 patients (63%), 5 (29%) of whom had seizure recurrence after initial reduction. Nearly all patient who relapsed regained seizure control after reinstitution of their ASMs regimen. Pre-operative seizure frequency (p = 0.002) and occurrence of acute post-operative seizures (p = 0.01) were associated with increased risk for seizure recurrence post ASMs reduction. At the end of the observation period, 11% of patients were seizure free without drugs, 52% were seizure free with drugs and 37% still experienced seizures despite ASMs. Compared with pre-operative status, the number of ASMs was reduced in 41% of patients, unchanged in 55% of them and increased in only 4% of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful MRg-LITT for ETLE allows for ASMs reduction in a significant portion of patients and complete ASMs withdrawal in a subset of them. Patients with higher pre-operative seizure frequency or occurrence of acute post operative seizures exhibit higher chances relapse post ASMs reduction.

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study investigated the success rate of withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) following stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), and identified predictors of seizure recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 65 patients who underwent SLAH for MTLE (59 lesional). Patients' demographics, disease characteristics and post-surgical outcomes were evaluated for their potential to predict seizure recurrence associated with withdrawal of AEDs.

RESULTS

The mean period of observation post SLAH was 51 months (range 12-96 months) and the mean period to initial reduction of AEDs was 21 months (range 12-60 months). Reduction of AEDs was attempted in 37 patients (57 %) who were seizure free post SLAH and it was successful in approximately 2/3 of them. From the remainder 1/3 who relapsed, nearly all regained seizure control after reinstitution of their AEDs. The likelihood of relapse after reduction of AEDs was predicted only by pre-operative seizure frequency. At the end of the observation period, approximately 14 % of all SLAH patients were seizure free without AEDs and approximately 54 % remained seizure free on AEDs. Compared with preoperative status, the number of AEDs were reduced in 37 % of patients, unchanged in 51 % of them and increased in 12 % of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful SLAH for MTLE allows for reduction of AEDs in a significant portion of patients and complete withdrawal of AEDs in a subset of them. Patients with higher pre-operative seizure frequency exhibit a greater chance of relapse post reduction of AEDs.

Neuropathology of Surgically Managed Epilepsy Specimens

Epilepsy is characterized as recurrent seizures, and it is one of the most prevalent disorders of the human nervous system. A large and diverse profile of different syndromes and conditions can cause perturbations in neural networks that are associated with epilepsy. Advances in neuroimaging and electrophysiological monitoring have enhanced our ability to localize the neuropathological lesions that alter the neural networks giving rise to epilepsy, whereas advances in surgical management have resulted in excellent seizure control in many patients following resections. Histopathologic study using a variety of special stains, molecular analysis, and functional studies of these resected tissues has facilitated the neuropathological characterization of these lesions. Here, we review the neuropathology of common structural lesions that cause epilepsy and are amenable to neurosurgical resection, such as hippocampal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia, and its associated principal lesions, including long-term epilepsy-associated tumors, as well as other malformations of cortical development and Rasmussen encephalitis.

Determining when to stop antiepileptic drug treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the number of patients diagnosed with epilepsy continues to rise and the pharmacological and device-based treatment options for epilepsy increase, determining when to stop antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment continues to be an important issue for patient management and counseling.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review focuses on outcomes following AED withdrawal in seizure-free adults with epilepsy. Practical considerations are also discussed because, despite the importance of this topic, relatively little progress has been made in the past year regarding the identification of patients whose risk for recurrent seizures after AED withdrawal is no higher than that of the general population.

SUMMARY

Although articles in the past year have updated the debates about whether and when to discontinue AEDs in seizure-free adults and have suggested potential utility for electroencephalograms as a prognostic tool for AED reduction as well as for an AED withdrawal risk calculator, decisions about AED withdrawal should still be based on the known risks and consequences of seizure recurrence and be made following well documented discussions between doctor and patient/carer.

Outcome after seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug withdrawal following temporal lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term outcome following seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the AED profile of patients who had a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up after anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Only those patients with hippocampal sclerosis or normal MRI were included. AED withdrawal was initiated at 3 months in patients on ≥2 drugs and at 1 year for patients on a single drug.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-four patients with median postoperative follow-up of 12 years (range, 7-17 years) were included. Of them, 316 patients (82.3%) were seizure-free during the terminal 1 year. AED withdrawal was attempted in 326 patients (84.9%). At last follow-up, AEDs were discontinued in 207 patients (53.9%). Seizure recurrence occurred in 92 patients (28.2%) on attempted withdrawal. After a median postrecurrence follow-up of 7 years, 79 (86%) of them were seizure-free during the terminal 2 years. AEDs could be stopped in 17 patients (18.5%) and doses were reduced in another 57 patients (62%). Patients with febrile seizures, normal postoperative EEG at 1 year, and duration of epilepsy of <20 years (FND20 score) had 17% risk of seizure recurrence on attempted AED withdrawal. We also formulated a score to predict the chances of AED freedom for the whole cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with seizure recurrence on AED withdrawal have good outcome with 86% becoming seizure-free and 18% becoming drug-free after initial recurrence. A FND20 score helps in predicting recurrence on AED withdrawal.

Uncertainties from a worldwide survey on antiepileptic drug withdrawal after seizure remission

Background

We sought to determine differences in practice for discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) after seizure remission and stimulate the planning and conduction of withdrawal trials.

Methods

We utilized a worldwide electronic survey that included questions about AED discontinuation for 3 paradigmatic cases in remission: (1) focal epilepsy of unknown etiology, (2) temporal lobe epilepsy after surgery, and (3) juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. We analyzed 466 complete questionnaires from 53 countries, including the United States. Statistical analysis included χ² and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Case 1: responders in practice for <10 years were less likely to taper AEDs: odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.52 (0.32-0.85), p = 0.02. The likelihood of stopping AEDs was higher among doctors treating children: OR (95% CI): 11.41 (2.51-40.13), p = 0.002. Doctors treating children were also more likely to stop after 2 years or less of remission: OR (95% CI): 6.91 (2.62-19.31), p = 0.002, and the same was observed for US physicians: OR (95% CI): 1.61 (1.01-2.57), p = 0.0049. Case 2: responders treating children were more likely to taper after 1 year or less of postoperative remission, with the goal of discontinuing all medications: OR (95% CI): 1.91 (1.09-3.12), p = 0.015, and so were US-based responders: OR (95% CI): 1.73 (1.21-2.41), p = 0.003. Case 3: epileptologists were less likely to withdraw the medication: OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.39-0.82), p = 0.003, and so were those in practice for 10 or more years: OR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.31-0.95), p = 0.025.

Conclusions

We observed several differences in practice for AED withdrawal after seizure remission that highlight global uncertainty. Trials of AED discontinuation are needed to provide evidence-based guidance.

Does early postoperative drug regimen impact seizure control in patients undergoing temporal lobe resections?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) load on seizure control in patients who underwent surgical treatment for pharmacoresistant mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy during the first two postoperative years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

532 consecutive patients (48.7% males and 51.7% females) who underwent surgical treatment for mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy were retrospectively evaluated regarding effects of AED load on seizures control during the first 2 years following epilepsy surgery. We analyzed whether postoperative increases in postoperative AED load are associated with better seizure control in patients initially not seizure free, and if postoperative decreases in postoperative AED load would increase the risk for seizure persistence or recurrence. For statistical analyses, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon test were applied.

RESULTS

68.9, 64.0 and 59.1% of patients were completely seizure free (Engel Ia) at 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Patients in whom daily drug doses were increased did not have a higher rate of seizure freedom at any of the three follow-up periods. Of 16 patients achieving secondary seizure control at 12 months after surgery, only one did so with an increase in drug load in contrast to 15 patients who experienced a running down of seizures independent of drug load increases. Decreases in drug load did not significantly increase the risk for seizure recurrence. Of postoperatively seizure free patients at 3 months after surgery in whom AED were consequently reduced, 85% remained completely seizure free at 1 year and 76% at 1 year after surgery, respectively, as opposed to 86% each when AED was not reduced (differences n.s.). Mean daily drug load was significantly lower in seizure free patients at 12 and 24 months compared to patients with ongoing seizures.

CONCLUSION

In this large patient cohort stratified to the epilepsy syndrome neither did a postoperative reduction in drug load significantly increase the risk for seizure relapse nor did increases in drug dosages lead to improved seizure control. Mean drug load was on average lower in seizure free- than non-seizure free patients at 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Secondary seizure control after initial postoperative seizures in > 90% of cases occurred as a running down, independent of an AED increase. Thus, the effect of the surgical intervention rather than the postoperative drug regimen was the key determinant for seizure control. This finding supports a curative role of temporal lobe surgery rather than an effect rendering the majority of patients' pharmacoresponsive with a critical role of the antiepileptic drug regime for seizure control.

Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Surgery

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a chronic brain disease that is caused by various factors and characterized by recurrent, episodic and temporary central nervous system dysfunction which results due to excessive discharge of brain neurons. In the past decades, despite the continuous development of antiepileptic drugs, there are still many patients with epilepsy progressing to drugresistant epilepsy. Currently, surgical treatment is one of important way to cure drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

Data were collected from Web of Science, Medline, Pubmed, through searching of these keywords: "surgery" and "drug-resistant epilepsy".

RESULTS

An increasing number of studies have shown that surgery plays an important role in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Moreover, the comprehensive treatment mainly based on surgery can achieve the remission and even cure of drug-resistant epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis of drug-resistant epilepsy and the comprehensive treatment mainly based on surgery; this review may provide a reference for the clinical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy.

Neuropathology of epilepsy

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders, affecting about 50 million people worldwide. The disease is characterized by recurrent seizures, which are due to aberrant neuronal networks resulting in synchronous discharges. The term epilepsy encompasses a large spectrum of syndromes and diseases with different etiopathogenesis. The recent development of imaging and epilepsy surgery techniques is now enabling the identification of structural abnormalities that are part of the epileptic network, and the removal of these lesions may result in control of seizures. Access of this clinically well-characterized neurosurgical material has provided neuropathologists with the opportunity to study a variety of structural brain abnormalities associated with epilepsy, by combining traditional routine histopathologic methods with molecular genetics and functional analysis of the resected tissue. This approach has contributed greatly to a better diagnosis and classification of these structural lesions, and has provided important new insights into their pathogenesis and epileptogenesis. The present chapter provides a detailed description of the large spectrum of histopathologic findings encountered in epilepsy surgery patients, addressing in particular the nonneoplastic pathologies, including hippocampal sclerosis, malformations of cortical development, Sturge-Weber syndrome, and Rasmussen encephalitis, and reviews current knowledge regarding the underlying molecular pathomechanisms and cellular mechanisms mediating hyperexcitability.

Reducing versus stopping antiepileptic medications after temporal lobe surgery

Objective

To study the safety of antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery.

Methods

We reviewed patients who underwent TLE surgery from 1995 to 2011, collecting data on doses, dates of AED initiation, reduction, and discontinuation. Predictors of seizure outcome were defined using Cox-proportional hazard modeling and adjusted for, while comparing longitudinal seizure-freedom in patients for whom AEDs were unchanged after resection as opposed to reduced or stopped.

Results

A total of 609 patients (86% adults) were analyzed. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 16.7 years. Most (64%) had hippocampal sclerosis. Overall, 229 patients had remained on their same baseline AEDs, while 380 patients stopped (127 cases) or reduced (253 cases) their AEDs. Mean timing of the earliest AED change was shorter in patients with recurrent seizures (1.04 years) compared to those seizure-free at last follow-up (1.44 years; P-value 0.03). Whether AEDs were withdrawn 12 or 24 months after surgery, there was a 10–25% higher risk of breakthrough seizures within the subsequent 2 years. However, 70% of patients with seizure recurrence after AED discontinuation reachieved remission, as opposed to 50% of those whose seizures recurred while reducing AEDs (P = 0.0001). Long-term remission rates were similar in both AED discontinuation and “unchanged” groups (82% remission for AEDs withdrawn after 1 year and 90% for AEDs withdrawn after 2 years), while only 65% of patients whose recurrences started during AED reduction achieved a 2-year remission by last follow-up.

Interpretation

AED withdrawal increases the short-term risk of breakthrough seizures after TLE surgery, and may alter the long-term disease course in some patients.

Evaluation of different antiepileptic drug strategies in medically refractory epilepsy patients following epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the most appropriate antiepileptic drug strategies after successful epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

A total of 131 refractory epilepsy patients who underwent epilepsy surgery from January 2005 to December 2008 in the Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups (monotherapy, duotherapy, and polytherapy) according to drug combinations used immediately after epilepsy surgery. Seizure outcomes were followed up for more than 2 years. Engel classification was used to evaluate seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative follow-up period was 3.7±1.0 years. Preoperative baseline data among the three groups were comparable. Seizure recurrence rate in monotherapy was obviously higher than in other groups (34.1% vs. 15.1%, 7.1%) at 6-month follow-up, which showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.02). Seizure outcomes for 2 years were assessed using Engel classification. In the duotherapy group, the rate of Engel class I was definitely higher than in the other two groups (69.9% vs. 47.7%, 57.1%, p=0.02). Seizure relapse rates at the 2-year follow-up, after planned reduction or withdrawal, were 46.4% for monotherapy, 16.9% for duotherapy, and 25.0% for polytherapy (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy may be not sufficient enough to control seizures completely. It appears to have a higher risk for seizure relapse when considering drug reduction. It suggests that duotherapy may be more effective and safer than monotherapy. Even after successful epilepsy surgery, duotherapy seems preferable to monotherapy or polytherapy for control of residual seizures.

Stopping antiepileptic drugs: when and why?

After a patient has initiated an antiepileptic drug (AED) and achieved a sustained period of seizure freedom, the bias towards continuing therapy indefinitely can be substantial. Studies show that the rate of seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal is about two to three times the rate in patients who continue AEDs, but there are many benefits to AED withdrawal that should be evaluated on an individualized basis. AED discontinuation may be considered in patients whose seizures have been completely controlled for a prolonged period, typically 1 to 2 years for children and 2 to 5 years for adults. For children, symptomatic epilepsy, adolescent onset, and a longer time to achieve seizure control are associated with a worse prognosis. In adults, factors such as a longer duration of epilepsy, an abnormal neurologic examination, an abnormal EEG, and certain epilepsy syndromes are known to increase the risk of recurrence. Even in patients with a favorable prognosis, however, the risk of relapse can be as high as 20% to 25%. Before withdrawing AEDs, patients should be counseled about their individual risk for relapse and the potential implications of a recurrent seizure, particularly for safety and driving.