Do older adults have equitable access to specialist epilepsy services?

Patient-centered outcomes and quality of life in elderly people with epilepsy: A focused review

The highly heterogeneous population of elderly with epilepsy continues to increase as the incidence of epilepsy rises with increasing life expectancy. There are many aspects to consider in the treatment of elderly with epilepsy, e g comorbidities and the complexity of polypharmacy. The literature on quality-of-life (QoL) and patient-centered outcomes in elderly in general as well as in elderly with epilepsy is limited, most of the existing studies report results from quality-of-life surveys. No such QoL questionnaires have, however, in the validation process explored issues specific to the elderly. Seizure frequency, co-morbidities and depression predicted QoL in elderly with epilepsy and the energy/fatigue domain scored worst when QOLIE-31 was used. In the handful of qualitative interview studies identified in this review, a number of topics specific for elderly with epilepsy were explored. Some of these were difficulties with information gathering, the importance of maintaining normalcy, incongruence with provider goals and wanting to be more involved in the treatment. There is a need for further exploration of the specific concerns of elderly with epilepsy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the studies and emphasizes the importance of involving elderly people with epilepsy in their own care.

The incidence and prevalence of epilepsy in the United Kingdom 2013-2018: A retrospective cohort study of UK primary care data

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to update overall incidence and prevalence calculations for epilepsy of the United Kingdom (UK) and its constituent nations (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales).

METHODS

We used data from primary care practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CRPD), based on the electronic health records of 14 million patients, representing approximately 20% of the population. CPRD contains data from two different health record systems: the Vision clinical system (CPRD GOLD database) and the EMIS Web® clinical system (CPRD Aurum database). We calculated incidence and prevalence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Data were stratified by age, gender, deprivation, country (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) and region (England only).

RESULTS

In the UK, the estimated overall point prevalence for epilepsy was 9.37 per 1000 persons / year (95% CI 9.34-9.40) and the overall estimated incidence rate was 42.68 per 100,000 person-years (95% 42.18-43.18) using the CPRD GOLD database. In England, the estimated incidence (37.41 (95% CI 36.96-37.83)) and prevalence (8.85 (95% CI 8.83-8.87)) was lower (combined databases) compared to figures for Scotland (incidence 47.76 (95% CI 46.15-49.42)); prevalence 10.13 (95% CI 10.06-10.20)) (CPRD GOLD only), Wales (incidence 54.84 (95% CI 52.79-56.95); prevalence 11.40 (95% CI 11.31-11.49)) (CPRD GOLD only) and Northern Ireland (incidence 46.18 (95% CI 43.13-49.90); prevalence 12.08 (95% CI 11.93-12.23))(combined databases). Prevalence and incidence were higher in more deprived regions.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and incidence of epilepsy in the UK is broadly in line with other high income countries, showing the usual pattern of high incidence in the young and the old, with a nadir in middle age. The prevalence of epilepsy has fallen slightly since 2011. There is significant geographical variation (between countries and between regions), and a suggestion of a relationship between deprivation and epilepsy which needs further investigation.

Care After Presenting with Seizures (CAPS): An analysis of the impact of a seizure referral pathway and nurse support on neurology referral rates for patients admitted with a seizure

INTRODUCTION

The National Audit of Seizure Management in Hospitals (NASH) identified low referral rates to neurology and epilepsy services after an emergency department attendance or admission with a seizure.

METHODS

National Health Service Secondary Users Service (SUS) data were used to assess the impact of a seizure pathway at seven hospitals in Cheshire & Merseyside, which was implemented in 2014. Three of these hospitals also had a nurse employed part-time to support the pathway. Patients admitted with a seizure between 2011 and 2018 inclusive were identified using an algorithm based on ICD-10 codes, and the primary outcome was a neurology referral within 3 months of admission. Regression models were used to assess the impact of age, deprivation and comorbidity on post admission clinic referral rates.

RESULTS

13,285 admissions with seizure were included in the analysis. 5,677 had not attended a neurology clinic appointment in the 12 months before the admission. The percentage of whom that were offered an appointment following the admission was: 16.0% before the pathway and 35.9% with the nurse-supported pathway, which was significant in the regression model. 4,700 admissions had attended a neurology clinic appointment in the 12 months before the admission. Of this group, the percentage of whom that were offered an appointment following the admission was: 55.2% before the pathway and 62.4% with the nurse-supported pathway, an increase that was not significant in the regression model. The regression models identified significant health inequalities whereby older patients, those with comorbidities and those living in deprived areas were significantly less likely to be referred.

CONCLUSION

Neurology out-patient appointment rates following an admission with seizures are low, worryingly so for those with no neurology appointment in the previous 12 months. A nurse-supported pathway can improve appointment rates, but the effect is modest. Further service redesign is required; the impact of which should be rigorously evaluated.

Best care for older people with epilepsy: A scoping review

There are two peaks of diagnosis of epilepsy: in childhood and in people over 65. Older people may have complex needs like co-morbidity, polypharmacy, frailty, and social isolation. This scoping review focusses on the care of older people with epilepsy beyond diagnosis and medical treatment. We sought to identify areas within the UK health service needing development either in clinical practice or through further research. The search returned 4864 papers with 33 papers included in the review. The papers were grouped into psychosocial, self-management and services themes. Only one randomised controlled trial was found. Research was mainly based on cohort and case-control studies. Older people require more information to self-manage epilepsy and more psychological support to help with symptoms of anxiety and depression. People reported experiencing stigma and a reluctance to disclose their condition. This may increase the risk of isolation and difficulties in managing epilepsy. Studies reported that older people are referred less to neurologists, suggesting there may be a gap in care provision compared to younger people. Generalist health professionals may be better placed to provide holistic care, but they may need additional training to alleviate uncertainties in managing epilepsy. Care plans could help provide information, particularly for co-morbidity, but few had one. Our findings highlight psychological and self-management needs for managing epilepsy in older people. Health service staff may require upskilling to shift epilepsy management from neurologists to generalists. More research is needed regarding psychological and self-management interventions, particularly in the form of randomised controlled trials.

Epilepsy monitoring units in Saudi Arabia: Where do we stand compared to developed countries?

Objectives:

To descriptively assess Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMUs) and the provided services in Saudi Arabia and compare them based on the geographic region.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, an electronic questionnaire was emailed to all directors of EMUs in Saudi Arabia from July 2013 to January 2016, with constant updates being made by all respondents throughout the period of data collection.

Results:

All EMU directors participated. There were 11 EMUs in KSA operating in 8 hospitals; 8 (54.5%) EMUs in Riyadh, 2 (18.2%) in Dammam, 2 (18.2%) in Makkah and 1 (9.1%) in Jeddah. Five (54.5%) EMUs were shared for adults and pediatrics, 3 (27.3%) were devoted to adult patients, and 3 (27.3%) to pediatric patients. The average waiting time was 11 weeks (range: 2-52 weeks). The mean percentage of patients coming from an outside region was 30.6%. The average length of stay was 7 days. Less than 100 patients were monitored annually in 54.5% of the EMUs. Seven EMUs (63.6%) admitted less than 100 patients for seizure characterization. Intracranial monitoring was available in all EMUs. Most EMUs (54.5%) admitted less than 100 patients for pre-surgical workup while 36.4% admitted 100-199, and 9.1% admitted more than 300 patients per year. Epilepsy surgeries were performed for less than 50 patients annually in 81.8% of the hospitals.

Conclusion:

There are 11 EMUs in Saudi Arabia fully equipped to serve epileptic patients. However, they are underutilized considering the number of admitted patient and the number of epilepsy surgeries per year. Also, they are unequally distributed throughout the kingdom.

The monetary burden of cysticercosis in Mexico

Background

Taenia solium cysticercosis is a public health and agricultural problem in many low and middle-income countries where health education, sanitation, pig management practices and meat inspection infrastructure are insufficient. Cysticercosis affects both human and animal health and has important economic consequences. Very few studies have been conducted to evaluate the monetary burden of cysticercosis. This study aimed at estimating the 2015 costs associated with cysticercosis in humans and pigs in Mexico.

Methods

The monetary burden of human cysticercosis was estimated based on costs incurred by living with and treating epilepsy and severe chronic headaches associated with neurocysticercosis (NCC). The estimated cost of porcine cysticercosis took into consideration losses due to the reduction in the price of cysticercosis-infected animals. Epidemiologic and economic data were obtained from the published literature, government reports, and setting-specific questionnaires. Latin hypercube sampling methods were employed to sample the distributions of uncertain parameters and to estimate 95% credible regions (95% CRs). All results are reported in 2015 U.S.$.

Findings

The overall monetary burden associated with NCC morbidity was estimated at U.S.$215,775,056 (95% CR U.S.$109,309,560 –U.S.$361,924,224), with U.S.$436 (95% CR: U.S.$296 –U.S.$604) lost per patient. If loss of future years of income and productivity due to NCC-associated deaths was included, this value increased by U.S.$54.26 million, assuming that these individuals earned Mexico’s median wage salary. An additional U.S.$19,507,171 (95% CR U.S.$5,734,782 –U.S.$35,913,487) was estimated to be lost due to porcine cysticercosis.

Conclusions

This study suggests that T. solium cysticercosis results in considerable monetary losses to Mexico.

Taenia solium cysticercosis is a parasitic disease, which can be transmitted between humans and pigs in areas of the world where pigs are raised in a traditional manner and latrines are not always used by the local population. Because cysticercosis affects humans and pigs, it is important to assess how much this infection costs both the public health and agricultural sectors in endemic countries such as Mexico. Costs associated with infection of both humans and pigs, in Mexico, were estimated using the literature, questionnaires, and publicly available data. Study findings suggest that T. solium cysticercosis results in considerable monetary losses to Mexico. The methodology developed here can be applied to estimate the monetary burden of cysticercosis in other regions in order to better prioritize disease control initiatives.

Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients taken to hospital by emergency ambulance after a suspected seizure.

DESIGN

Quantitative cross-sectional retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients.

SETTING

An acute hospital trust in a large city in England.

PARTICIPANTS

In 2012-2013, the regions' ambulance service managed 605 481 emergency incidents, 74 141/605 481 originated from Sheffield (a large city in the region), 2121/74 141 (2.9%) were suspected seizures and 178/2121 occurred in May 2012. We undertook detailed analysis of the medical records of the 91/178 patients who were transported to the city's acute hospital. After undertaking a retrospective review of the medical records, the best available aetiological explanation for the seizures was determined.

RESULTS

The best available aetiological explanation for 74.7% (68/91) of the incidents was an epileptic seizure, 11.0% (10/91) were psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and 9.9% (9/91) were cardiogenic events. The epileptic seizures fall into the following four categories: first epileptic seizure (13.2%, 12/91), epileptic seizure with a historical diagnosis of epilepsy (30.8%, 28/91), recurrent epileptic seizures without a historical diagnosis of epilepsy (20.9%, 19/91) and acute symptomatic seizures (9.9%, 9/91). Of those with seizures (excluding cardiogenic events), 2.4% (2/82) of patients were seizing on arrival in the Emergency Department (ED), 19.5% (16/82) were postictal and 69.5% (57/82) were alert. 63.4% (52/82) were discharged at the end of their ED attendance and 36.5% (19/52) of these had no referral or follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Most suspected seizures are epileptic seizures but this is a diagnostically heterogeneous group. Only a small minority of patients require emergency medical care but most are transported to hospital. Few patients receive expert review and many are discharged home without referral to a specialist leaving them at risk of further seizures and the associated morbidity, mortality and health services costs of poorly controlled epilepsy.

Identifying inequitable healthcare in older people: systematic review of current research practice

BACKGROUND

There is growing consensus on the importance of identifying age-related inequities in the receipt of public health and healthcare interventions, but concerns regarding conceptual and methodological rigour in this area of research. Establishing age inequity in receipt requires evidence of a difference that is not an artefact of poor measurement of need or receipt; is not warranted on the grounds of patient preference or clinical safety; and is judged to be unfair.

METHOD

A systematic, thematic literature review was undertaken with the objective of characterising recent research approaches. Studies were eligible if the population was in a country within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and analyses included an explicit focus on age-related patterns of healthcare receipt including those 60 years or older. A structured extraction template was applied. Extracted material was synthesised in thematic memos. A set of categorical codes were then defined and applied to produce summary counts across key dimensions. This process was iterative to allow reconciliation of discrepancies and ensure reliability.

RESULTS

Forty nine studies met the eligibility criteria. A wide variety of concepts, terms and methodologies were used across these studies. Thirty five studies employed multivariable techniques to produce adjusted receipt-need ratios, though few clearly articulated their rationale, indicating the need for great conceptual clarity. Eighteen studies made reference to patient preference as a relevant consideration, but just one incorporated any kind of adjustment for this factor. Twenty five studies discussed effectiveness among older adults, with fourteen raising the possibility of differential effectiveness, and one differential cost-effectiveness, by age. Just three studies made explicit reference to the ethical nature of healthcare resource allocation by age. While many authors presented suitably cautious conclusions, some appeared to over-stretch their findings concluding that observed differences were 'inequitable'. Limitations include possible biases in the retrieved material due to inconsistent database indexing and a focus on OECD country populations and studies with English titles.

CONCLUSIONS

Caution is needed among clinicians and other evidence-users in accepting claims of healthcare 'ageism' in some published papers. Principles for improved research practice are proposed.

Epilepsy management in older people: Lessons from National Audit of Seizure management in Hospitals (NASH)

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is the third most common diagnosis in older people, however management in this group remains variable. National Audit of Seizure management in Hospitals (NASH) set out to assess care provided to patients attending hospitals in England following a seizure.

METHOD

154 Emergency Departments (EDs) across the UK took part. 1256 patients aged 60 years or over were included for analysis (median age 74 years, 54% men). 51% were known to have epilepsy, 17% had history of previous seizure or blackout and 32% presented with a suspected first seizure.

RESULTS

14% of older patients with epilepsy were not on treatment, 59% were on monotherapy. Sodium valproate was the most commonly used antiepileptic, 28%. 35% of patients with epilepsy, aged 60 and over, had a CT during admission compared to only 17% of those under 60. 80% of patients aged 60 and over presenting with a likely first seizure were admitted to hospital, compared to 65% of those under 60. 34% of those with suspected first seizure were referred to a neurologist on discharge compared to 68% of patients under the age of 60. 52% of 60-69year olds with a suspected first seizure were referred to neurology compared to 25% of patients aged 80-89.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients presenting with seizures are more likely to be admitted to hospital and have imaging. They are less likely to be referred to specialist services on discharge. There appears to be significant disparity in patient age and rate of referral.

Epilepsy services in Saudi Arabia. Quantitative assessment and identification of challenges

Objective:

To assess the epilepsy services and identify the challenges in hospitals without epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). In addition, comparisons between governmental and private sectors, as well as between regions, are to be performed.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study conducted using an online questionnaire distributed to the secondary and tertiary hospitals without EMUs throughout the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The study was conducted from September 2013 to September 2015 and regular updates from all respondents were constantly made. Items in the questionnaire included the region of the institution, the number of pediatric and adult neurologists and neurosurgeons along with their subspecialties, the number of beds in the Neurology Department, whether they provide educational services and have epilepsy clinics and if they refer patients to an EMU or intend to establish one in the future.

Results:

Forty-three institutions throughout the Kingdom responded, representing a response rate of 54%. The majority of hospitals (58.1%) had no adult epileptologists. A complete lack of pediatric epileptologists was observed in 72.1% of hospitals. Around 39.5% were utilizing beds from internal medicine. Hospitals with an epilepsy clinic represented 34.9% across all regions and sectors. Hospitals with no intention of establishing an EMU represented 53.5%. Hospitals that did not refer their epileptic patients to an EMU represented 30.2%.

Conclusions:

Epilepsy services in KSA hospitals without EMUs are underdeveloped.

Patient perceptions of the referral of older adults to an epilepsy clinic: do patients and professionals agree who should be referred to a specialist?

The aim of this study was to establish whether older patients concurred with previously reported staff perceptions of why older adults may be underrepresented in epilepsy clinics. Fifteen interviews with older patients provided support for four of seven key factors previously suggested by professionals as leading to underreferral of older adults: unclear referral pathway, complex differential diagnosis, gaps in referrer knowledge, and the length of time since onset. However, the patients interviewed did not report that patient difficulties accessing the hospital, patient reluctance to attend clinics, or the particular characteristics of older patients (knowledge, awareness, and willingness to ask for help) made it less likely that older adults would want to attend a specialist epilepsy clinic. While recognizing the limitations of the study, particularly in relation to the number of participants, we believe that it provides valuable further insights into the age-bias apparent in referral patterns to specialist epilepsy services. Of particular concern are professional assumptions regarding older patients' willingness to attend appointments and about the impact of seizures on the life of an older adult.

Understanding referral patterns to an epilepsy clinic: professional perceptions of factors influencing the referral of older adults

PURPOSE

The number of older patients with epilepsy has been increasing steadily, however older adults have been shown to be referred less commonly to specialist epilepsy services than younger individuals. The aim of this study was to explore staff perceptions of why older adults may be under-represented in epilepsy clinics.

METHOD

We conducted 19 interviews with potential referrers and staff providing services including GPs, geriatricians, neurologists, service and clinical managers and epilepsy nurses. Data were analysed using principles of thematic analysis to identify and examine recurring views and perceptions.

RESULTS

Seven key factors were suggested as leading to under-referral of older adults: patient difficulties accessing hospital; patient reluctance to attend clinics; unclear referral pathway; complex differential diagnosis; gaps in referrer knowledge; the length of time since onset; and particular characteristics of older patients.

CONCLUSION

While recognising the limitations of the study we believe that it provides valuable further understanding of referral patterns to specialist epilepsy services. Future studies will need to determine whether the assumptions made by the interviewees about the thoughts and wishes of older people with epilepsy were correct or not. To understand this issue more clearly, we plan to sample the views of patients directly. Of particular concern are assumptions regarding older patient's willingness to attend appointments and about the impact of seizures on the life of an older adult.

Applying evidence to patient care: from population health to individual patient values

What are the health status and health needs of people with epilepsy? How do clinicians and patients choose between alternative interventions for the same condition? Are health interventions used effectively in the community, and do they improve health? How can we translate findings from regulatory clinical trials to the real world? These and similar questions are the subject of applied translational research. This evolving and broad-ranging area of research involves the application of basic sciences such as epidemiology, biostatistics, economics, and behavioral science to the assessment of health, health interventions, and outcomes. However, despite its palpable importance, applied translational research remains underfunded and underutilized. Using their own innovative research as a prototype, two young and promising investigators provide insights not only into the enormous potential but also the gaps and hurdles of two specific areas of applied translational research, i.e., clinical decision analysis and health services research. The message is clear that if we are to understand and improve the health of people with epilepsy in clinics, hospitals, and communities, we must substantially increase research capacity to address the many gaps that thwart our progress in applied research in epilepsy.

Temporal trends in pre-surgical evaluations and epilepsy surgery in the U.S. from 1998 to 2009

OBJECTIVE

To analyze trends in utilization of pre-surgical evaluations including video-EEG (VEEG) monitoring, intracranial EEG (IEEG) monitoring, and epilepsy surgery from 1998 to 2009 in the U.S.

METHODS

Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to identify admissions for pre-surgical evaluations and surgery. Surgical treatment of epilepsy was identified by the presence of primary ICD-9-CM procedure codes 01.52 (hemispherectomy), 01.53 (lobectomy), or 01.59 (other excision of the brain, including amygdalohippocampectomy). We calculated annual rates of pre-surgical evaluations and surgery based on published estimates of prevalence of epilepsy in the U.S. In addition, we examined variations by region and hospital characteristics, and conducted multivariable analysis to detect temporal trends, adjusting for changes in the population. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted using different algorithms to identify the study population and outcomes.

RESULTS

We detected an increase in the rate of hospitalizations related to intractable epilepsy. Similarly, we noted a significant increase in hospitalizations for VEEG monitoring, but not in IEEG monitoring or in surgery. Multivariable analysis and sensitivity analysis confirmed these results. In addition, there was a significant increase in the proportion of pre-surgical evaluations and surgery performed in non-teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increase in VEEG monitoring, the availability of guideline and evidences demonstrating benefits of epilepsy surgery was not associated with a greater employment of surgery over time. Nevertheless, access to pre-surgical evaluations and epilepsy surgery is no longer limited to large medical centers.