Further evidence for an interaction between alcohol and certain H2-receptor antagonists

Drug Interactions with Antiulcer Agents: Considerations in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

All of the antiulcer agents have been implicated in drug interactions. These agents generally influence the absorption, metabolism, or elimination of other medications. However, these interactions can lead to alterations in pharmacodynamic response. The mechanisms by which antiulcer agents produce drug interactions differ among the agents. It is beyond the scope of this article to review all of the drug interactions that have been reported with antiulcer agents. However, it is the intent to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which antiulcer agents may interact with other medications and to provide insight into factors that may influence the potential magnitude or clinical consequences of these interactions. An understanding of antiulcer drug interactions will aid pharmacists in assisting clinicians with drug selection and/or monitoring of drug interactions. Specifically, pharmacists can assist with the identification of potential antiulcer drug interactions and develop strategies designed to minimize adverse consequences of these interactions.

Is there an interaction between H2-antagonists and alcohol?

H2-antagonists are commonly prescribed drugs and alcohol use is widespread in the community. Any possible interaction may be important because of the frequent co-administration of both drugs and the potential for unexpected impairment of pyschomotor function, in particular, driving skills. Hepatic ADH is the major site of alcohol metabolism. ADH is also found in the stomach, but it is uncertain whether gastric ADH is able to metabolise a significant amount of alcohol in vivo. Significant first-pass metabolism can be demonstrated at lower doses of alcohol, and if alcohol is given after meals. Varying degrees of extraction of alcohol from the portal circulation probably explains the data regarding first pass metabolism rather than gastric metabolism by gastric ADH. H2-receptor antagonists inhibit gastric ADH activity to a variable extent. If gastric metabolism of alcohol is negligible then this inhibition has no relevance. Given the uncertainty regarding a mechanism of interaction, only carefully conducted studies in controlled environments will answer the question. The large inter-subject variability of alcohol absorption means that any study which seeks to determine the effect of an H2-receptor antagonist on ethanol metabolism must have sufficient numbers. A cross-over design, with each subject acting as his own control, is preferable to avoid ascribing an effect to treatment rather than to chance. The alcohol dosing studies are reviewed and the results summarised according to dose of alcohol given. At a dose of 0.15 g/kg of alcohol, four commonly used H2-antagonists may cause a small increase in blood alcohol concentrations in certain conditions. This absolute increase is very small. The magnitude of effect is far less than the effect of taking a meal before alcohol. At doses of 0.3 g/kg and above the majority of evidence favours no interaction between H2-antagonists and alcohol. There is no interaction at doses that would be expected to impair psychomotor skills (above 25 mg/dl). There remains a question regarding the cumulative effect of repeated small doses of alcohol and further studies are required. The relationship between ethanol absorption and gastric emptying raises the possibility that the effects of H2-receptor antagonists observed at very low doses of alcohol may be due to the acceleration of gastric emptying by these drugs. This is an attractive hypothesis that explains many aspects of the debate, but studies of the effect of H2-antagonists on gastric emptying have been conflicting.

Effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists on blood alcohol levels: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect, if any, of histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on serum alcohol levels under various conditions including type of H2RA receptor antagonist, alcohol dose, and fed status of the subject.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of the published literature.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by MEDLINE (January 1982 through December 1997) using the key words H2 receptor antagonists and alcohol. Other studies were identified by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles and by discussion with colleagues.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they involved the coadministration of H2RAs and alcohol in healthy, human volunteers. Studies that may have addressed this goal but were performed in another context, for instance the measurement of ulcer healing, were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted on the design, number of participants, participant characteristics, type and dose of H2RA administered, serum alcohol levels (measured as Cmax) along with standard deviations, dose of alcohol received, and fed or fasted status of participants. Alcohol dose was arbitrarily divided into low dose (< or = 0.5 g/kg body weight) versus high dose (> 0.5 g/kg body weight). In addition, studies involving ranitidine and cimetidine were stratified by sample size into small (n < or = 10) versus not small (n > 10).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four trials met selection criteria. Small elevations in Cmax were noted when cimetidine (2.71 mg/DL; 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.60, 3.83) or ranitidine (6.95 mg/DL; 95% CI 5.83, 8.08) were coadministered with alcohol. No such differences were noted for famotidine (0.28 mg/DL; 95% CI -1.24, 1.80) or nizatidine (2.33 mg/DL;, 95% CI -0.06, 4.72). The elevation detected with cimetidine and ranitidine was most pronounced in smaller studies (n < 10). Separate analyses investigating the effect of alcohol dose and fed or fasted status of participants revealed no clinically important differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Cimetidine and ranitidine, but not the other H2RAs, can cause small elevations of serum alcohol level when alcohol and drug are administered concurrently. Studies with larger numbers of participants were less likely to demonstrate this effect. Relative to accepted, legal definitions of intoxication, the effect of any H2RA on blood alcohol level is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Metabolism of ethanol and some associated adverse effects on the liver and the stomach

Current knowledge of alcohol oxidation and its effects on hepatic metabolism and its toxicity are summarized. This includes an evaluation of the relationship of the level of consumption to its interaction with nutrients (especially retinoids, carotenoids, and folate) and the development of various stages of liver disease. Ethanol metabolism in the stomach and its link to pathology and Helicobacter pylori is reviewed. Promising therapeutic approaches evolving from newly gained insight in the pathogenesis of medical complications of alcoholism are outlined. At present, the established approach for the prevention and treatment of alcoholism are outlined. At present, the established approach for the prevention and treatment of alcoholic liver injury is to control alcohol abuse, with the judicial application of selective antioxidant therapy, instituted at early stages, prior to the social or medical disintegration of the patient, and associated with antiinflammatory agents at the acute phase of alcoholic hepatitis. In addition, effective antifibrotic therapy may soon become available.

Gastric ethanol metabolism and gastritis: interactions with other drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and antibiotic therapy (1957-1997)--a review

The stomach provides some protection against the penetration of ethanol into the body by contributing to the metabolism of ethanol. The latter is attenuated by various drugs and, although the magnitude of this effect is still the subject of debate, patients should be warned of the corresponding possible increase in blood alcohol levels. Furthermore, oxidation of ethanol generates acetaldehyde, a toxic metabolite. In addition, chronic alcohol abuse seems to favor colonization by Helicobacter pylori, which produces ammonia that also contributes to the commonly associated chronic gastritis. Because antibiotics were shown over the last 4 decades to effectively eliminate gastric ammonia, they should be considered for the routine treatment of such chronic gastritis in the way they are now being used for ulcer therapy.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between alcohol and other drugs

The frequent use of alcohol (ethanol) together with prescription drugs gives any described pharmacokinetic interaction significant clinical implications. The issue is both the effect of alcohol on the pharmacokinetics of various drugs and also the effect of those drugs on the pharmacokinetics of alcohol. This review discusses these pharmacokinetic interactions but also briefly describes some other effects of alcohol that are clinically relevant to drug prescribing. The use of several different study designs may be required before we can confidently state the presence or absence of any alcohol-drug interaction. Short term administration of alcohol in volunteers is the most common study design but studies of social drinking and prolonged moderate alcohol intake can be important in some situations. Community-based studies may illustrate the clinical relevance of any interaction. Alcohol can affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs by altering gastric emptying or liver metabolism (by inducing cytochrome P450 2E1). Drugs may affect the pharmacokinetics of alcohol by altering gastric emptying and inhibiting gastric alcohol dehydrogenase. The role of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase in the first-pass metabolism of alcohol is reviewed in this article and the arguments for and against any potential interaction between alcohol and H2 receptor antagonists are also discussed. The inhibition of the metabolism of acetaldehyde may cause disulfiram-like reactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions between alcohol and prescription drugs are common, particularly the additive sedative effects with benzodiazepines and also with some of the antihistamine drugs; other interactions may occur with tricyclic antidepressants. Alcohol intake may be a contributing factor to the disease state which is being treated and may complicate treatment because of various pathophysiological effects (e.g. impairment of gluconeogenesis and the risk of hypoglycaemia with oral hypoglycaemic agents). The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and alcohol intake increases the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

The effect of cimetidine on ethanol concentrations in fasting women and men after two different doses of alcohol

BACKGROUND

Serum ethanol concentrations may become higher when alcohol is consumed during treatment with histamine receptor antagonists, especially if ethanol is ingested postprandially. Only a few studies have investigated fasting subjects, and women have only been investigated sporadically.

METHODS

The present study compared serum ethanol concentrations after a 4-h fast followed by a low (0.15 g/kg) and a high (0.45 g/kg) dose of ethanol, on two separate occasions in six women and six men. The study was carried out before and after treatment with 400 mg cimetidine twice daily.

RESULTS

Cimetidine administration did not change the area under the concentration-time curve or the maximal serum ethanol concentration in either women or men, irrespective of ethanol dose. Ethanol elimination rate was unchanged by cimetidine.

CONCLUSION

Cimetidine does not influence the ethanol concentration-time curve when ethanol is ingested on an empty stomach.

First-pass metabolism of alcohol. Absence of diurnal variation and its inhibition by cimetidine after evening meal

To determine whether the first-pass metabolism (FPM) of orally consumed alcohol varies with the time of day, 12 healthy male subjects were tested with both oral and intravenous alcohol (0.3 g/kg), in the morning and evening, always 1 hr after the same standard meal. The results revealed no significant differences in FPM (81.6 +/- 11.6 vs 92.8 +/- 10.6 mg/kg) or in any other index of alcohol absorption and metabolism. Eleven subjects were also tested in the evening after treatment with cimetidine, an H2-antagonist that inhibits gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity in vitro. Compared to baseline, cimetidine (1 g/day for eight days) significantly decreased FPM (from 100.1 +/- 8.0 to 52.6 +/- 11.4 mg/kg, P < 0.01) and increased the systemic bioavailability of alcohol (from 66 +/- 3 to 82 +/- 4%, P < 0.01), as well as peak blood alcohol concentrations (from 4.3 +/- 0.4 to 5.9 +/- 0.5 mM, P < 0.05) and areas under the curve (from 5.1 +/- 0.5 to 7.0 +/- 0.5 mM/hr, P < 0.01). The results indicate the absence of diurnal variation in FPM and suggest that patients given cimetidine should be warned of its possible interaction with alcohol regardless of the time of day.

Helicobacter infection and gastric ethanol metabolism

The organism frequently colonizing the stomach of patients suffering from chronic active gastritis and peptic ulcer disease--Helicobacter pylori--possesses marked alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity. Consequently, Helicobacter infection may contribute to the capacity of the stomach to metabolize ethanol and lead to increased acetaldehyde production. To study this hypothesis, we first determined ADH activity in a variety of H. pylori strains originally isolated from human gastric mucosal biopsies. ADH activity was also measured in endoscopic gastric mucosal specimens obtained from H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. Furthermore, we used a mouse model of Helicobacter infection to determine whether infected animals exhibit more gastric ethanol metabolism than noninfected controls. Most of the 32 H. pylori strains studied possessed clear ADH activity and produced acetaldehyde. In humans, gastric ADH activity of corpus mucosa did not differ between H. pylori-positive and -negative subjects, whereas in antral biopsies ADH activity was significantly lower in infected patients. In mice, gastric ADH activity was similar or even lower in infected animals than in controls, depending on the duration of infection, despite the fact that the infectious agent used--Helicobacter felis--showed ADH activity in vitro. In accordance with this, Helicobacter infection tended to decrease rather than increase gastric ethanol metabolism in mice. In humans, it remains to be established whether the observed decrease in antral ADH activity associated with H. pylori infection can lead to reduced gastric first-pass metabolism of ethanol.

Acetaldehyde and ethanol production by Helicobacter pylori

By virtue of possessing alcohol dehydrogenase activity, cytosol prepared from Helicobacter pylori produces toxic acetaldehyde from ethanol in vitro. To approach the in vivo situation in the stomach, we have now investigation whether intact H. pylori--without addition of exogenous nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide--also forms acetaldehyde. Furthermore, to assess the energy metabolism of H. pylori, we determined whether the alcohol dehydrogenase-catalyzed reaction can run in the opposite direction with ethanol as the end-product and thereby yield energy for the organism. Intact H. pylori formed acetaldehyde already at low ethanol concentrations (at 0.5% ethanol, acetaldehyde, 64 +/- 21 and 75 +/- 9 mumol/l (mean +/- SEM) for strains NCTC 11637 and NCTC 11638, respectively). H. pylori produced ethanol in concentrations that can be significant for the energy metabolism of the organism. Acetaldehyde production by H. pylori may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal diseases associated with the organism. The primary function of H. pylori alcohol dehydrogenase may, however, be alcoholic fermentation and consequent energy production under microaerobic conditions.

Alcohol and the liver: 1994 update

This article reviews current concepts on the pathogenesis and treatment of alcoholic liver disease. It has been known that the hepatotoxicity of ethanol results from alcohol dehydrogenase-mediated excessive generation of hepatic nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced form, and acetaldehyde. It is now recognized that acetaldehyde is also produced by an accessory (but inducible) microsomal pathway that additionally generates oxygen radicals and activates many xenobiotics to toxic metabolites, thereby explaining the increased vulnerability of heavy drinkers to industrial solvents, anesthetics, commonly used drugs, over-the-counter medications, and carcinogens. The contribution of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase to the first-pass metabolism of ethanol and alcohol-drug interactions is discussed. Roles for hepatitis C, cytokines, sex, genetics, and age are now emerging. Alcohol also alters the degradation of key nutrients, thereby promoting deficiencies as well as toxic interactions with vitamin A and beta carotene. Conversely, nutritional deficits may affect the toxicity of ethanol and acetaldehyde, as illustrated by the depletion in glutathione, ameliorated by S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Other "supernutrients" include polyunsaturated lecithin, shown to correct the alcohol-induced hepatic phosphatidylcholine depletion and to prevent alcoholic cirrhosis in nonhuman primates. Thus, a better understanding of the pathology induced by ethanol is now generating improved prospects for therapy.

Famotidine increases plasma alcohol concentration in healthy subjects

The effect of famotidine on plasma alcohol concentration was studied in 24 healthy male subjects who demonstrated high apparent ethanol first-pass metabolism after oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) ethanol administration (i.e. AUC(po) < or = 40% of AUC(i.v.), where AUC is area under the plasma ethanol concentration-time curve). Six of the original 30 subjects screened (20%) did not demonstrate high first-pass metabolism and were excluded. In a randomized open crossover study, oral ethanol pharmacokinetics were assessed after breakfast in the morning following a 3-day regimen of famotidine, 40 mg/day, and following a no-drug control period. Famotidine increased the area under the plasma ethanol concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) by 29% (7.1 vs 5.5 mg.h/dL, P = 0.006) and maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) by 23% (9.2 vs 7.5 mg/dL, P = 0.013). The changes in ethanol AUC0-t and Cmax may have been associated with changes in gastric emptying, as they were inversely correlated with changes in the time at which maximal plasma concentration was attained. There was considerable intra-individual variation in ethanol AUC and Cmax. As a result, regression to the mean is a potentially confounding problem in ethanol pharmacokinetic studies when subjects are selected on the basis of having low AUC(po), and properly controlled randomized studies of substantial size are required to detect modest drug effects. Small effects on ethanol pharmacokinetics have now been demonstrated with all four of the major H2-receptor antagonists, but these effects are seen only under specific experimental conditions and appear to be unimportant clinically.

Effects of omeprazole on ethanol metabolism: an in vitro and in vivo rat and human study

Since some H2-receptor antagonists, like cimetidine or ranitidine, affect ethanol metabolism by interference with gastric and/or hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) it was investigated whether omeprazole has a similar effect and its effects were compared with those of cimetidine, an inhibitor of gastric ADH. The first-pass metabolism (FPM), quantified by measuring the difference between areas under the curve (AUC) of ethanol blood concentrations after oral intake or intravenous administration of the same amount (0.3 g kg-1 b.w.) of ethanol (EtOH), was studied before and after 1 week of omeprazole (20 mg daily) or cimetidine (800 mg daily) administration in 10 normal male volunteers. ADH activity was determined in gastric mucosal samples, collected during endoscopy, before and after 1 month of omeprazole treatment. The effect of the drugs on gastric and hepatic ADHs was studied in vitro in both rat and man. No significant effect of omeprazole was found on AUCs of the blood EtOH concentrations. The ADH activity in antral mucosa before and after omeprazole therapy did not show significant differences. In vitro, omeprazole reduced the activity of the low Km gastric ADH with a Ki of 5.6 mM in rat and the hepatic ADH activity with a Ki of 2.4 mM in man, whereas the drug did not show any effect on hepatic ADH in rat and gastric ADH in man. On the contrary, cimetidine increased the AUCs of EtOH blood concentrations after both gastric and intravenous route and, in the in vitro assay, inhibited gastric and hepatic ADH in both man and rat. These results indicate that omeprazole does not affect EtOH metabolism in man and seems to be safer than cimetidine in subjects unable to reduce ethanol intake during the therapy for peptic ulcer or other hypersecretory conditions.

Mechanisms of ethanol-drug-nutrition interactions

Mechanisms of the toxicologic manifestations of ethanol abuse are reviewed. Hepatotoxicity of ethanol results from alcohol dehydrogenase-mediated excessive hepatic generation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and acetaldehyde. It is now recognized that acetaldehyde is also produced by an accessory (but inducible) pathway, the microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system, which involves a specific cytochrome P450. It generates oxygen radicals and activates many xenobiotics to toxic metabolites, thereby explaining the increased vulnerability of heavy drinkers to industrial solvents, anesthetics, commonly used drugs, over-the-counter medications and carcinogens. The contribution of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase to the first pass metabolism of ethanol and alcohol-drug interactions is now recognized. Alcohol also alters the degradation of key nutrients, thereby promoting deficiencies as well as toxic interactions with vitamin A and beta-carotene. Conversely, nutritional deficits may affect the toxicity of ethanol and acetaldehyde, as illustrated by the depletion in glutathione, ameliorated by S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Other supernutrients include polyenylphosphatidylcholine, shown to correct the alcohol-induced hepatic phosphatidylcholine depletion and to prevent alcoholic cirrhosis in non-human primates. Thus, a better understanding of the pathology induced by ethanol has now generated improved prospects for therapy.

Characteristics of Helicobacter pylori alcohol dehydrogenase

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori shows alcohol dehydrogenase activity, which in the presence of ethanol leads to in vitro production of acetaldehyde, a toxic and highly reactive substance. The present study was undertaken to further define H. pylori-related ethanol and acetaldehyde metabolism by characterizing H. pylori alcohol dehydrogenase and by determining whether the organism possesses aldehyde dehydrogenase.

METHODS

Cytosolic alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities were determined spectrophotometrically. Acetaldehyde produced by cytosol during incubation with ethanol was measured by head space gas chromatography. Isoenzyme pattern was studied using isoelectric focusing.

RESULTS

Significant alcohol dehydrogenase activity was observed at a neutral pH known to occur in gastric mucus. The Km for ethanol oxidation was approximately 100 mmol/L for the two strains tested. Acetaldehyde was formed already from a low ethanol concentration known to prevail in the stomach endogenously. Isoelectric focusing of the enzyme showed activity bands with pI at 7.1-7.3, a pattern different from that of gastric mucosal alcohol dehydrogenase. 4-methylpyrazole inhibited enzyme activity in a competitive manner and suppressed the growth of the organism during culture. Neither Helicobacter strain studied showed aldehyde dehydrogenase activity and can thus not remove acetaldehyde by that pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetaldehyde production by H. pylori from exogenous or endogenous ethanol may be a pathogenetic mechanism behind mucosal injury associated with the organism.

Comparative trial in volunteers to investigate possible ethanol-ranitidine interaction

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of ranitidine on ethanol absorption after ethanol 0.5 g/kg is given in three single doses of 0.167 g/kg to simulate normal social drinking.

DESIGN

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was performed in 16 healthy men. Ethanol serum concentrations were measured on day 6 of each of the three treatment periods (placebo, ranitidine 150 mg bid, or ranitidine 300 mg bid).

METHODS

Ethanol 0.167 g/kg was administered followed by a standard meal at 1700. The last tablet of the test medication was given 15 minutes later. Thirty and 60 minutes after the first intake, the same amount of ethanol was given again. Serum ethanol concentrations were measured multiple times during the four-hour period following oral ingestion of the first dose.

RESULTS

Comparison of median serum ethanol concentrations, the areas under the curve, peak and time to peak serum ethanol concentrations showed no significant differences during medication with placebo, ranitidine 150 mg bid, or ranitidine 300 mg bid. Peak ethanol concentrations (median values) were 153, 140, and 155 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that treatment with ranitidine, in a dose up to 300 mg bid, has no significant effect on serum ethanol concentrations, even when ethanol was given in divided doses to simulate normal patterns of social drinking. This implies that concomitant dosing with ranitidine will not increase the adverse effects of moderate doses of ethanol on concentration and psychomotor function.

Review article: lack of clinical significance of the interaction between H2-receptor antagonists and ethanol

It has been proposed that an appreciable fraction of ingested ethanol is metabolized in the gastric mucosa and that inhibition of this metabolism by H2-receptor antagonists produces clinically important increases in blood ethanol. This paper reviews available data concerning gastric metabolism of ethanol and the influence of H2-antagonists on ethanol metabolism. It concludes that very little, if any, metabolism of ethanol is likely to occur in the gastric mucosa, and the interaction between H2-antagonists and ethanol is clinically insignificant.

Ranitidine, cimetidine, famotidine have no effect on post-prandial absorption of ethanol 0.8 g/kg taken after an evening meal

Forty-seven healthy male subjects were studied twice using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Each subject took an 8-day course of two of the following four regimens; 300 mg ranitidine, 800 mg cimetidine, 40 mg famotidine or placebo (identical either to 300 mg ranitidine or 800 mg cimetidine). The systemic bioavailability of ethanol (integrated 6-h plasma ethanol concentration, peak plasma ethanol concentration, and the time to peak plasma ethanol concentration) was measured after the oral ingestion of 0.8 g of ethanol per kg body weight, given one hour after an evening meal on Day 8 of each regimen. There was no significant difference of integrated 6-h plasma ethanol concentration, peak ethanol concentration, or time to reach peak ethanol concentration after dosing with either ranitidine, cimetidine or famotidine or placebo.