Changes in orders limiting care and the use of less aggressive care in a nursing home population

Association Between Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate Orders and Emergency Medicine Residents’ Decision Making

BACKGROUND

Research has shown that do not resuscitate (DNR) and do not intubate (DNI) orders may be construed by physicians to be more restrictive than intended by patients. Previous studies of physicians found that DNR/DNI orders are associated with being less willing to provide invasive care.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of code status on emergency residents' decision-making regarding offering invasive procedures for those patients with DNR/DNI compared with their full code counterparts.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide survey of emergency medicine residents using an instrument of 4 clinical vignettes involving patients with serious illnesses. Two versions of the survey, survey A and survey B, alternated the DNR/DNI and full code status for the vignettes. Residency leaders were contacted in August 2018 to distribute the survey to their residents.

RESULTS

Three hundred and three residents responded from across the country. The code status was strongly associated with decisions to intubate or perform CPR and influenced the willingness to offer other invasive procedures. DNR/DNI status was associated with less frequent willingness to place central venous catheters (88.2% for DNR/DNI vs. 97.2% for full code, p < 0.001), admit patients to the intensive care unit (89.9% vs. 99.0%, p < 0.001), offer dialysis (79.3% vs. 98.0%, p < 0.001), and surgical consultation (78.7% vs. 94.2%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide survey, emergency medicine residents were less willing to provide invasive procedures for patients with DNR/DNI status, including the placement of central venous catheters, admission to the intensive care unit, and consultation for dialysis and surgery.

Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders: understanding and interpretation of their use in the hospitalised patient in Ireland. A brief report

Following the introduction of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in the 1970s, there was widespread misinterpretation of the term among healthcare professionals. In this brief report, we present findings from a survey of healthcare professionals. Our aim was to examine current understanding of the term do-not-attempt-resuscitate (DNAR), decision-making surrounding DNAR and awareness of current guidelines. The survey was distributed to doctors and nurses in a university teaching hospital and affiliated primary care physicians in Dublin via email and by hard copy at educational meetings from July to December 2014. A total of 519 completed the survey. The response rate in the hospital doctors group was 35.5% (187/527), 19.8% (292/1477) in the nurses group but 68.8% (150/218) in the specialist nurses group and 40% (40/100) in the primary care physician group.Alarmingly, our results demonstrate that 26.8% of staff nurses and 30% of primary care physicians surveyed believed that a patient with a DNAR order could not receive any/at least one of a list of simple treatments including antibiotics, physiotherapy, intravenous fluids, pain relief, oxygen, nasogastric feeding or airway suctioning, which were higher percentages compared to the other hospital doctors and experienced nurses groups with statistically significant differences (p<0.001). Furthermore, a higher percentage of staff nurses (26.8%) and primary care physicians (22.5%) believed that a patient with a DNAR order could not be referred to hospital from home/a nursing home, when compared with other healthcare groups (p<0.001). Our findings highlight continued misunderstanding and over-interpretation of DNAR orders. Further collaboration and information is required for meaningful Advance Care Plans.

Care Consistency With Documented Care Preferences: Methodologic Considerations for Implementing the "Measuring What Matters" Quality Indicator

A basic tenet of palliative care is discerning patient treatment preferences and then honoring these preferences, reflected by the inclusion of "Care Consistency With Documented Care Preferences" as one of 10 "Measuring What Matters quality" indicators. Measuring What Matters indicators are intended to serve as a foundation for quality measurement in health care settings. However, there are a number of logistic and practical issues to be considered in the application of this quality indicator to clinical practice. In this brief methodologic report, we describe how care consistency with documented care preferences has been measured in research on patients near the end of life. Furthermore, we outline methodologic challenges in using this indicator in both research and practice, such as documentation, specificity and relevance, preference stability, and measuring nonevents. Recommendations to strengthen the accuracy of measurement of this important quality marker in health care settings include consistent recording of preferences in the medical record, considerations for selection of treatment preferences for tracking, establishing a protocol for review of preferences, and adoption of a consistent measurement approach.

Finnish Nurses’ Views on End-of-Life Discussions and a Comparison with Physicians’ Views

This study investigated Finnish nurses’ experiences and views on end-of-life decision making and compared them with physicians’ views. For this purpose, a questionnaire was sent to 800 nurses, of which 51% responded. Most of the nurses had a positive attitude towards and respect for living wills, more often than physicians. Most also believed that a will had an effect on decision making. Almost all of the nurses considered it their responsibility to talk to physicians about respecting living wills. Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders were often interpreted to imply partial or complete palliative (symptom-orientated) care, which may cause confusion. Half of the nurses reported that a DNR decision was discussed always or often with a patient who was able to communicate; physicians were more positive in this respect. Surprisingly, many nurses (44%) stated that active treatment continued too long. Two-thirds thought that their opinions were taken into account sufficiently, even though only half believed that, in general, they had some impact.

High Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in East Asia

BACKGROUND

Severe sepsis is a potentially deadly illness and always requires intensive care. Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders remain a debated issue in critical care and limited data exist about its impact on care of septic patients, particularly in East Asia. We sought to assess outcome of severe sepsis patients with regard to DNR status in Taiwan.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) between 2008 and 2010. All severe sepsis patients were included for analysis. Primary outcome was association between DNR orders and ICU mortality. Volume of interventions was used as proxy indicator to indicate aggressiveness of care.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven (9.4%) of 712 patients had DNR orders on ICU admission, and these patients were older and had higher disease severity compared with patients without DNR orders. Notably, DNR patients experienced high ICU mortality (90%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of DNR orders was independently associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio: 6.13; 95% confidence interval: 2.66-14.10). In propensity score-matched cohort, ICU mortality rate (91%) in the DNR group was statistically higher than that (62%) in the non-DNR group (p <0.001). Regarding ICU interventions, arterial and central venous catheterization were more commonly used in DNR patients than in non-DNR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

From the Asian perspective, septic patients placed on DNR orders on ICU admission had exceptionally high mortality. In contrast to Western reports, DNR patients received more ICU interventions, reflecting more aggressive approach to dealing with this patient population. The findings in some ways reflect differences between East and West cultures and suggest that DNR status is an important confounder in ICU studies involving severely septic patients.

The influence of do-not-resuscitate status on the outcomes of patients undergoing emergency vascular operations

BACKGROUND

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders allow patients to communicate their wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Although DNR status may influence physician decision making regarding resuscitation, the effect of DNR status on outcomes of patients undergoing emergency vascular operation remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of DNR status on the outcomes of emergency vascular surgery.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients requiring emergency vascular surgical interventions between 2005 and 2010. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were extracted. Patients were compared according to DNR status. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

During the study period, 16,678 patients underwent emergency vascular operations (10.8% of the total vascular surgery population). Of those, 548 patients (3.3%) had a DNR status. The differences in rates of open or endovascular repair or of intraoperative blood requirement between the two groups were not significant. After adjusting for differences in demographics and clinical data, DNR patients were more likely to have higher rates of graft failure (8.7% vs 2.4%; adjusted P < .01) and failure to wean from mechanical ventilation (14.9 % vs 9.9%; adjusted P < .001). DNR status was associated with a 2.5-fold rise in 30-day mortality (35.0% vs 14.0%; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.9; adjusted P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a DNR order was independently associated with mortality. Patient and family counseling on surgical expectations before emergency vascular operations is warranted because the risks of perioperative events are significantly elevated when a DNR order exists.

Do not resuscitate orders and aging: impact of multimorbidity on the decision-making process

BACKGROUND

The "Do Not Resuscitate" orders (DNR) are defined as advance medical directives to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest. Age-related multimorbidity may influence the DNR decision-making process. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data examining the relationship between DNR orders and multimorbidity in older patients.

METHODS

A systematic Medline and Cochrane literature search limited to human studies published in English and French was conducted on August 2012, with no date limits, using the following Medical Subject Heading terms: "resuscitation orders" OR "do-not-resuscitate" combined with "aged, 80 and over" combined with "comorbidities" OR "chronic diseases".

RESULTS

Of the 65 selected studies, 22 met the selection criteria for inclusion in the qualitative analysis. DNR orders were positively associated with multimorbidity in 21 studies (95%). The meta-analysis included 7 studies with a total of 27,707 participants and 5065 DNR orders. It confirmed that multimorbidity were associated with DNR orders (summary OR = 1.25 [95% CI: 1.19-1.33]). The relationship between DNR orders and multimorbidity differed according to the nature of morbidities; the summary OR for DNR orders was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23) for cognitive impairment, OR=2.58 (95% CI: 2.08-3.20) for cancer, OR=1.07 (95% CI: 0.92-1.24) for heart diseases (i.e., coronary heart disease or congestive heart failure), and OR=1.97 (95% CI: 1.61-2.40) for stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that DNR orders are positively associated with multimorbidity, and especially with three morbidities, which are cognitive impairment, cancer and stroke.

The effect of do-not-resuscitate status on postoperative mortality in the elderly following emergency surgery

Elderly patients who have preexisting DNR orders experience a high incidence of mortality and major morbidity within 30 days after emergency general surgery. Although not a risk factor for major morbidity, preoperative DNR status does represent an independent risk factor for mortality after emergency general surgery. The most plausible reason for the excess mortality in DNR patients is their decreased willingness to undergo aggressive treatment of major postoperative complications. Whether patient-driven failure-to-pursue-rescue also explains to some extent the high mortality of non-DNR elderly emergency general surgery patients deserves further investigation.

Failure-to-pursue rescue: explaining excess mortality in elderly emergency general surgical patients with preexisting "do-not-resuscitate" orders

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcomes of elderly patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status who undergo emergency general surgery and to improve understanding of the relationship between preoperative DNR status and postoperative mortality.

BACKGROUND

Preoperative DNR status has previously been shown to predict increased postoperative mortality, although the reasons for this association are not well understood.

METHODS

Patients 65 years or older undergoing emergency operation for 1 of 10 common general surgical diagnoses were extracted from the 2005-2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Propensity score techniques were used to match patients with and without preoperative DNR orders on indication for procedure, patient demographics, comorbid disease burden, acute physical status at the time of operation, and procedure complexity. The postoperative outcomes of this matched cohort were then compared.

RESULTS

A total of 25,558 patients were included for analysis (DNR, n =1061; non-DNR, n =24,497). DNR patients seemed to be more acutely and chronically ill than non-DNR patients in the overall study sample but did not seem to be treated less aggressively before or during their operations. Propensity-matching techniques resulted in the creation of a cohort of DNR and non-DNR patients who were well matched for all preoperative and intraoperative variables. DNR patients from the matched cohort had a significantly higher postoperative mortality rate than non-DNR patients (36.9% vs 22.3%, P < 0.0001) despite having a similar rate of major postoperative complications (42.1% vs 40.2%, P = 0.38). DNR patients in the propensity-matched cohort were much less likely to undergo reoperation (8.3% vs 12.0%, P = 0.006) than non-DNR patients and were significantly more likely to die in the setting of a major postoperative complication (56.7% vs 41.4%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency general surgery in elderly patients with preoperative DNR orders is associated with significant rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. One reason for the excess mortality in these patients, relative to otherwise similar patients who do not have preoperative DNR orders, may be their greater reluctance to pursue aggressive management of major complications in the postoperative period.

Partial do-not-resuscitate orders: A hazard to patient safety and clinical outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Patients and families commonly discuss end-of-life decisions with clinicians to create a treatment plan based on patient wishes. In some instances, respect for patient autonomy in making choices may create the potential for patient harm. Medical treatments are often performed in groupings in order to work effectively. When such combinations are separated as a result of patient or surrogate choices, critical elements of life- saving care may be omitted, and the patient may receive nonbeneficial or harmful treatment. A partial do-not-resuscitate order may serve as an example.

LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION

The limited literature available regarding partial do-not-resuscitate order(s) suggests the practice is clinically and ethically problematic. Not much is known about the prevalence of these orders, but some clinicians believe they are a growing phenomenon. Medical and bioethics organizations have produced guidelines and recommendations on the use of full do-not-resuscitate order(s) with little mention of partial do-not-resuscitate order(s). Partial do-not-resuscitate order(s) are designed based on the patient's anticipated need for resuscitation and are intended to manage dying in a tolerable manner based on what the decision maker believes is "best." Through an analysis of the medical literature, we propose that a partial do-not-resuscitate order contradicts this "best" management intention because it is impossible for the decision maker, or care providers, to anticipate all possible prearrest and arrest situations. We propose that a partial do-not-resuscitate order highlights larger problems: 1) a misunderstanding of the meaning and scope of a do-not-resuscitate order and 2) a need for discussions around goals of care.

CONCLUSION

Discouraging partial do-not-resuscitate(s) order may help promote more accurate and comprehensive advance care planning.

Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting

BACKGROUND

The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm Program was designed to ensure the full range of patient treatment preferences are honored throughout the health care system. Data are lacking about the use of POLST in the hospice setting.

OBJECTIVE

To assess use of the POLST by hospice programs, attitudes of hospice personnel toward POLST, the effect of POLST on the use of life-sustaining treatments, and the types of treatments options selected by hospice patients.

DESIGN

A telephone survey was conducted of all hospice programs in three states (Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia) to assess POLST use. Staff at hospices reporting POLST use (n = 71) were asked additional questions about their attitudes toward the POLST. Chart reviews were conducted at a subsample of POLST-using programs in Oregon (n = 8), West Virginia (n = 5), and Wisconsin (n = 2).

RESULTS

The POLST is used widely in hospices in Oregon (100%) and West Virginia (85%) but only regionally in Wisconsin (6%). A majority of hospice staff interviewed believe the POLST is useful at preventing unwanted resuscitation (97%) and at initiating conversations about treatment preferences (96%). Preferences for treatment limitations were respected in 98% of cases and no one received unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, intensive care, or feeding tubes. A majority of hospice patients (78%) with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders wanted more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category such as antibiotics or hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The POLST is viewed by hospice personnel as useful, helpful, and reliable. It is effective at ensuring preferences for limitations are honored. When given a choice, most hospice patients want the option for more aggressive treatments in selected situations.

The impact of do-not-resuscitate order on triage decisions to a medical intensive care unit

PURPOSE

To determine whether the presence of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order impacts on triage decisions to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) of an academic medical center.

METHODS

Data were collected on 179 patients in whom MICU consultation was sought and included demographic, clinical information, diagnoses, ICU admission decision, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and the presence of DNR order. Functional status was determined retrospectively using the Modified Rankin Score.

RESULTS

The only factor that influenced MICU admission was the presence of DNR order at the time of MICU consultation (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.71, P < .006). There was no difference between the age, APACHE II scores, or functional status between admitted or refused. Medical intensive care unit admission was associated with increased length of stay without difference in mortality.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a DNR order at the time of MICU consultation was significantly associated with the decision to refuse a patient to the MICU.

Effect of decisions to withhold life support on prolonged survival

BACKGROUND

The effect on long-term mortality of decisions made to withhold life-supporting therapies (LST) for critically ill patients is unclear. We hypothesized that mortality 60 days after ICU admission is not influenced by a decision to withhold use of LST in the context of otherwise providing all indicated care.

METHODS

We studied 2,211 consecutive, initial admissions to the adult, medical ICU of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. To achieve balanced groups for comparing outcomes, we created a multivariable regression model for the probability (propensity score [PS]) of having an order initiated in the ICU to withhold LST. Each of the 201 patients with such an order was matched to the patient without such an order having the closest PS; mortality rates were compared between the matched pairs. Cox survival analysis was performed to extend the main analysis.

RESULTS

The matched pairs were well balanced with respect to all of the potentially confounding variables. Sixty days after ICU admission, 50.5% of patients who had an order initiated in the ICU to withhold life support had died, compared to 25.8% of those lacking such orders (risk ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.6). Survival analysis indicated that the difference in mortality between the two groups continued to increase for approximately 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to our hypothesis, decisions made in the ICU to withhold LST were associated with increased mortality rate to at least 60 days after ICU admission.

Which Advance Directive Matters? An Analysis of End-of-Life Decisions Made in Nursing Homes

This study clarifies the role of advance directives in the process of decision making in nursing homes. Physicians reported on the actual use of advance directives in a medical decision-making process related to status changes in 70 nursing home residents (mean age = 89 years). Charts were also reviewed to assess the specifics of the advance directives. Despite a high prevalence of advance directives, the directives themselves had a very limited role in affecting treatments. The physicians surveyed viewed directives related to hospitalization as the most useful, though these were not the most available directives. The attention and format given to advance directives in the nursing home may need to be reevaluated.

Dying in a nursing home: the role of local bed supply in nursing home discharges

OBJECTIVE

The relationship of nursing home (NH) discharges due to death to NH bed supply and hospital bed supply was examined.

METHOD

Data on discharges came from the 1999 National Nursing Home Survey (N = 6,335). County-level bed supply, controls for hospice agency supply, and a nursing facility's percentage of area NH beds came from the Area Resource File. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare deaths with live discharges. Marginal effects were calculated.

RESULTS

Discharges due to death increased with increasing NH bed supply and decreased in areas with greater hospital bed supply, areas where hospitalizations were more likely. Hospice supply and a facility's share of area NH beds also affected the probability of discharges due to death.

DISCUSSION

Supply factors appear related to discharge decisions in a manner affecting the probability of discharges due to death, although the magnitude of the relationship may be less than expected.

Access to Nursing Home Hospice: Perspectives of Nursing Home and Hospice Administrators

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hospice improves the quality of end of life care in nursing homes but serves less than 10% of dying residents. For residents to elect hospice, nursing homes must first contract for these services. We surveyed nursing home and hospice administrators to describe facilitators and barriers to hospice in nursing homes, and to test whether nursing home administrators' attitudes correlate with hospice use.

METHODS

In a mailed survey, all nursing home and hospice administrators in North Carolina responded to items on hospice's effect on quality of care, and on facilitators and barriers to its use in nursing homes. Among nursing home administrators, bivariate analyses were used to test associations of attitudes with use of hospice.

RESULTS

After 2 mailings, 241 (62%) nursing home administrators and 74 (85%) hospice administrators responded. Eighty-three percent of nursing homes had a hospice contract, with a median of 3 residents enrolled in the last 3 months. Nursing home administrators were less likely than hospice administrators to believe that hospice improves quality of care for pain, emotional and spiritual needs, and bereavement support. Nursing home administrators were more likely to agree that, "Nursing homes provide good care without using hospice for dying residents and their families," (24% versus 1%, p < 0.001). Among nursing home administrators with a hospice contract (n = 180), those who agreed that hospice improves quality of care had higher rates of hospice use in their facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing home administrators' attitudes toward hospice may influence its availability for nursing home residents.

Decisions to Hospitalize Nursing Home Residents Dying with Advanced Dementia

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence of, timing of, and factors associated with decisions not to hospitalize nursing home residents with advanced dementia who were dying.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Six hundred seventy five-bed nursing facility in Boston.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty residents in a teaching nursing home who died between January 2001 and December 2003 with advanced dementia.

MEASUREMENTS

The prevalence and timing of do-not-hospitalize (DNH) orders were determined from the medical record. Data describing demographic characteristics, health conditions, advance care planning, sentinel events, and health services usage during the last 6 months of life were examined. Factors associated with having a DNH order were identified.

RESULTS

At the time of death, 83.8% of subjects had a DNH order. The prevalence of DNH orders was 50.0% and 34.4%, 30 and 180 days before death, respectively. Hospital transfers were common during the last 6 months of life (24.6%). Factors independently associated with having a DNH order before death included surrogate decision-maker was not the subject's child (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=4.39, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.52-12.66), eating problems (AOR=4.17, 95% CI=1.52-11.47), aged 92 and older (AOR=2.78, 95% CI=1.29-5.96), and length of stay 2 years or longer (AOR=2.34, 95% CI=1.11-4.93).

CONCLUSION

For most institutionalized persons with advanced dementia, a decision to forgo hospitalization is not made until death is imminent. Thus, hospital transfers are common near the end of life. The finding that DNH orders are associated with patient and surrogate factors can help clinicians identify cases in which decisions to forgo hospitalizations may be facilitated.

Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program in Oregon Nursing Facilities: Beyond Resuscitation Status

OBJECTIVES

Program was designed to communicate resident/surrogate treatment preferences in the form of medical orders. To assess statewide nursing facility use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) and to identify the patterns of orders documented on residents' POLST forms.

DESIGN

Telephone survey; on-site POLST form review.

SETTING

Oregon nursing facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-six nursing facilities in the telephone survey; 356 nursing facility residents aged 65 and older at seven nursing facilities in the POLST form review.

MEASUREMENTS

A telephone survey; onsite POLST form reviews.

RESULTS

In the telephone survey, 71% of facilities reported using the POLST program for at least half of their residents. In the POLST form review, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders were present on 88% of POLST forms. On forms indicating DNR, 77% reflected preferences for more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category. On POLST forms indicating orders to resuscitate, 47% reflected preferences for less than the highest level of treatment in at least one other category. The oldest old (> or = 85, n=167) were more likely than the young old (65-74, n=48) to have orders to limit resuscitation, medical treatment, and artificial nutrition and hydration.

CONCLUSION

The POLST program is widely used in Oregon nursing facilities. A majority of individuals with DNR orders requested some other form of life-extending treatment, and advanced age was associated with orders to limit treatments.

Site of Death in the Hospital Versus Nursing Home of Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Residents Admitted Under Medicare's Part A Benefit

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors that predict site of death (hospital vs nursing home (NH)), related costs, and geographic variation in site of death of NH residents admitted under the Medicare Part A Benefit.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

NHs located in the United States (N=13,146).

PARTICIPANTS

All persons admitted to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in 2001 who died in a SNF (n=101,307) or hospital (n=51,187).

MEASUREMENTS

Patient, facility, and geographic characteristics associated with death in a hospital and receipt of Medicare payment.

RESULTS

Absence of a do-not-resuscitate order, non-Caucasian ethnicity, greater functional independence, and higher cognitive status correlated with hospital as the site of death. Rural, hospital-based, and government-owned facilities had the lowest in-hospital death rates. Site of death varied widely from state to state. Of those who died in a hospital, 24.2% (12,410) died within 24 hours of transfer. The average daily combined stay Medicare payment for those who died in the hospital was $969, versus $300 for those who died in a NH.

CONCLUSION

Patient and facility characteristics predict site of death of Medicare NH patients, but in-hospital death rather than NH death varies geographically and is associated with higher daily Medicare payment.

Effect of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders on Hospitalization of Nursing Home Residents Evaluated for Lower Respiratory Infections

OBJECTIVES

To determine resident and facility characteristics associated with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and to test the effect of DNR orders on hospitalization of acutely ill nursing home (NH) residents with lower respiratory tract infections (LRIs).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Thirty-six NHs (almost 4,000 residents) in central and eastern Missouri in the Missouri Lower Respiratory Infection study.

PARTICIPANTS

NH residents with a LRI (n=1031).

MEASUREMENTS

Data were obtained from new Minimum Data Set evaluations, resident examination, and chart review. Associations between resident, physician, and facility characteristics and the presence of a DNR order and hospitalization within 30 days from evaluation for an LRI were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty percent of subjects had a DNR order, and 2% had a do-not-hospitalize order. Resident characteristics associated with a DNR order included older age, white race, having a surrogate decision-maker, NH residence for longer than 3 years, and more-impaired cognition. Residents with DNR orders were more likely to live in facilities with more licensed beds, a lower proportion of Medicaid recipients, and a higher prevalence of influenza vaccination. After controlling for potential confounders, residents with a DNR order before the acute illness episode were significantly less likely to be hospitalized (adjusted odds ratio=0.69, 95% confidence interval=0.49-0.97).

CONCLUSION

DNR orders independently reduce the risk of hospitalization for LRI and may function as a marker for undocumented care limitations or as a mandate to limit care (unrelated to resuscitation) in NH residents with LRI.

Advance care planning among residents in long-term care

This study was conducted to determine whether two types of advance directives exist for individuals residing in long-term care facilities. Findings were based on data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Study-Nursing Home Component (MEPS-NHC), a survey using a two-stage stratified probability sample of nursing homes and residents to produce valid national estimates of the nursing home population in the United States. The two types of advance directives included basic, i.e., living will or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, and progressive (do-not-hospitalize order or orders restricting feeding, medication, or other treatment). Approximately 59 percent of long-term care residents had a basic advance directive, 9 percent have a progressive directive, and 60 percent have some type of directive. Logistic regression results indicate that the factors associated with the likelihood of each type of directive differ considerably, and only two variables (African American ethnicity and less time in the facility) were associated with a reduced likelihood of having either type of directive. Our results indicate that the two proposed types of advance directives are distinct with regard to the variables predicting each.

Prevalence of 'do not attempt resuscitation' orders and living wills among patients suffering cardiac arrest in four secondary hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and implementation of 'do not resuscitate' orders, nowadays called 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) orders and living wills among patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not initiated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective survey of CA patients conducted in four secondary hospitals during 2000-2001. The information collected included the presence of DNAR and a living will and the patients sociodemographic and disease factors and the reasons for not initiating resuscitation when no DNAR order was present. Data on the resuscitated patients were collected according to the Utstein recommendations (analyzed and published separately) and used for comparison.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1486 patients suffered CA without resuscitation being initiated. Data collection was successful in 1143 patients (77%), who were included in the study. Most of the patients (84.5%) had a DNAR order. The prevalence of DNAR orders differed between the participating hospitals (P<0.001), and between the wards of the hospital, with most DNAR orders in the cardiac care unit (100%) and medical wards (87%). The patients designated as DNAR were likely to be older (P<0.01) and of poorer functional status (P<0.001). Reasons for abstaining from resuscitation without a DNAR order were unwitnessed arrest (27%) and terminal disease (66%). Living wills were uncommon (1.5%). Patients with a living will were likely to have a DNAR order (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Most patients who suffered in-hospital CA without resuscitation had a DNAR order, and, for those who did not, terminal disease and medical futility were evident in most cases. Living wills were uncommon, but they appeared to have had some impact on treatment.

The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making

The effect of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders on physicians' decisions to provide life-prolonging treatments other than cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for patients near the end of life was explored using a cross-sectional mailed survey. Each survey presented three patient scenarios followed by 10 treatment decisions. Participants were residents and attending physicians who were randomly assigned surveys in which all patient scenarios included or did not include a DNR order. Response to three case scenarios when a DNR order was present or absent were measured. Response from 241 of 463 physicians (52%) was received. Physicians agreed or strongly agreed to initiate fewer interventions when a DNR order was present versus absent (4.2 vs 5.0 (P =.008) in the first scenario; 6.5 vs 7.1 (P =.004) in the second scenario; and 5.7 vs 6.2 (P =.037) in the third scenario). In all three scenarios, patients with DNR orders were significantly less likely to be transferred to an intensive care unit, to be intubated, or to receive CPR. In some scenarios, the presence of a DNR order was associated with a decreased willingness to draw blood cultures (91% vs 98%, P =.038), central line placement (68% vs 80%, P =.030), or blood transfusion (75% vs 87%, P =.015). The presence of a DNR order may affect physicians' willingness to order a variety of treatments not related to CPR. Patients with DNR orders may choose to forgo other life-prolonging treatments, but physicians should elicit additional information about patients' treatment goals to inform these decisions.

The role of proxies in treatment decisions: evaluating functional capacity to consent to end-of-life treatments within a family context

Psychology as a profession has entered the arena of palliative and hospice care later in the process than other health care professions. Through the use of Familial Advance Planning Evaluations (FAPEs), however, psychologists can assist individuals and families in facing end-of-life transitions in important ways. Hospice and palliative care philosophy treats the patient and family as the unit of care. End-of-life decision-making is therefore a family matter as well as a normative developmental transition. Yet, little is known about the decision-making process. This paper reviews the literature regarding informed consent, advance care planning, and proxy decision-making and outlines a theoretical model for familial decision-making. Previous models of end-of-life capacity evaluations and family assessments are presented and serve as the basis for a comprehensive assessment of familial decision-making at the end of life. Functional capacity evaluations of individuals at the end of life regarding decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments enable both the individual patient and one identified proxy from his or her family to discuss important issues families may face during medical crises at the end of life. The information gleaned from such evaluations has the potential to assist psychologists and other professionals in designing family-specific interventions to reduce caregiving distress, improve quality of life for dying patients, and ease the transition to bereavement for caregivers.

Advance directives: older adults with dementia

The benefits and risks for older adults with dementia executing advance directives are discussed. Salient issues related to decision-specific capacity and models for advance planning and end-of-life decisions by cognitively impaired older adults are presented.

State variation in nursing home mortality outcomes according to do-not-resuscitate status

BACKGROUND

This study compares mortality outcomes of Medicaid-reimbursed nursing home residents with and without do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in two diverse states.

METHODS

We used 1994 Minimum Data Set Plus (MDS+) information on 3215 nursing home residents from two states. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to examine unadjusted mortality among those with and without DNR orders across states. We used a proportional hazard regression with main and interaction variables to model the likelihood of survival in the nursing home.

RESULTS

Approximately 27% of nursing home residents with DNR orders in State A die within the year, and approximately 40% of nursing home residents with DNR orders in State B die within the year. Regression results indicate that neither having a DNR order nor state of residence were independently associated with mortality. However, residing in State B and having a DNR order was associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with all others in the sample (risk ratio = 1.73; 95% confidence interval = 1.09, 2.75).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that DNR orders are associated with varying mortality across states. Future research is needed to identify the reasons why state level differences exist.

Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether nursing home residents and their families reported discussions about life-sustaining treatment with their physicians, the relationship between such discussions and orders to limit therapy, and predictors of physician-patient communication about life-sustaining treatment.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional interviews and retrospective chart abstraction.

SETTING

Three regions: West Coast, New England, Western.

SAMPLE

A total of 413 nursing home residents, 363 family/surrogate interviews, and 192 resident interviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measured were (1) physician-resident communication about life-sustaining treatment and (2) presence of an advance directive or do not resuscitate (DNR) order in resident's chart.

RESULTS

Seventy-four percent of residents had DNR orders, and 32% had advance directives; only 29% of residents reported discussions about life-sustaining treatment. Of residents with DNR orders who could have participated in discussions about life-sustaining treatment, nearly half reported they had not discussed CPR with their caregivers. Older age, longer duration of time living in nursing home, location in a New England nursing home, physician-family member discussion, and the presence of an advance directive in the medical chart were positively associated with having DNR orders. Physician-resident discussion was not associated with having a DNR order. For the subsample of interviewed residents, age and a diagnosis of cognitive impairment were negatively associated with a physician-resident discussion about life-sustaining treatment, whereas the likelihood of having a discussion increased with increasing numbers of medical diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Chart orders to limit therapy are common, but physician-resident discussions about life-sustaining treatments are not. Far more family members than residents report such discussions with the resident's physicians.

Significant changes in the terminal care of aged patients in the long-term care in Helsinki

Elderly patients (> or = 65 y) admitted to permanent institutional care in 1976 (n = 116) and 1985 (n = 193) in the city of Helsinki, Finland, were analyzed retrospectively in order to evaluate changes in the terminal care of aged patients. Patients were more demented and needed more care in 1985 than 1976. Decisions of "do not treat actively" (= NTA) increased from 16% to 39% for all patients and 18% vs 42% in patients not transferred. Laboratory examinations, parenteral treatment as well as antibiotic treatments in febrile patients during the last 7 days decreased even after controlling for dementia and functioning, but transfers to other institutions remained unchanged. The survey demonstrates that the terminal care has changed significantly as recommended in the guidelines.

Changes in advance care planning in nursing homes before and after the patient Self-Determination Act: report of a 10-state survey

OBJECTIVE

The Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) implemented in 1991 has focused national attention on the right of patients to be involved in decision-making and on the use of written advance directives. We report changes in advance care planning with the PSDA and other historical events in nursing homes in 10 states.

DESIGN

Pre- and Post-observational cohort study.

PATIENTS

Nursing home residents, residing in 270 long-term care facilities in 10 states, stratified to ensure representation of urban and rural facilities in each state. In 1990, 2175 patients were sampled, and 2088 different patients from the same facilities were sampled in 1993. Six-month follow-up was obtained at both time periods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Advance care planning was defined as the documentation in the medical record of a living will, a durable power of attorney, a "Do Not Resuscitate" (DNR) order, a "Do Not Hospitalize" (DNH) order, or an order to forgo artificial nutrition or hospitalization.

RESULTS

The rate of chart documentation of living wills increased from 4.2% in 1990 to 13.3% in 1993, and DNR orders increased dramatically from 31.1% to 51.5%. The rates of DNH and orders to forgo artificial hydration and nutrition remained less than 8% in both years. We found striking variations in advance care planing among the 10 states. In 1990, having a DNR order varied from 10.1% to 69.2% across the 10 states. With the exception of Oregon, where 69.2% of patients already had a DNR order, the states saw a 1.5 to 3.1 times increase in the rate of DNR orders in 1993 compared with 1990.

CONCLUSION

With the implementation of the PSDA, there was modest increase in documentation of living wills, but DNH and orders to forgo artificial hydration and nutrition remained the same. There was a substantial increase in DNR orders that began before the PSDA implementation. This increase was associated both with the implementation of the PSDA and the increased debate about the appropriateness of CPR for nursing home residents. This increase varied considerably among geographic areas from the 10 states. Future research is needed to understand this geographic variation.

Variations in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders in ICUS. Findings from a national study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To describe the variation in frequency of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in 42 US ICUs and to examine the relationship between published guidelines and qualitative observations about terminal care in 9 ICUs.

DESIGN

Prospective inception cohort.

SETTING

Forty-two ICUs in 40 US hospitals with more than 200 beds: 26 randomly selected and 14 large tertiary-care volunteers.

PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive sample of 17,440 ICU admissions during 1988 to 1990.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We used age, race, comorbid conditions, disease, functional status, and acute physiology score on ICU day 1 to predict the likelihood of a DNR order for each patient. A cross-validated model was then used to predict variations in the risk of an ICU DNR order from 0 to 45% (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.9). The model was then used to compare aggregate observed with predicted frequency of ICU DNR orders. Finally, we compared observations of DNR practices by a team of clinical and organizational researchers at 9 of the 42 ICUs with published guidelines and risk-adjusted DNR frequency: 1,577 admissions (9%) had DNR orders written in the ICU (range, 1.5 to 22%). The ICU site was a significant (p < 0.0001) predictor of variance in the patient level model. DNR orders were written significantly (p < 0.05) less frequently than predicted in 5 and more frequently than predicted in 3 of 42 ICUs. Nonwhite patients had significantly (p = 0.0001) fewer DNR orders after adjustment. The research team's implicit judgments following on-site analysis failed to distinguish ICUs with more or less DNR orders than predicted. Site-visited ICUs exhibited practices to emulate and practice to avoid.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of ICU DNR orders can be predicted based on individual risk factors for groups of ICU patients. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics, there is significant variation in the frequency of DNR orders in a national sample of ICUs. These variations may be due to unmeasured differences in patient characteristics such as treatment preferences, religious affiliation, educational level, or physician practices. We found no relationship between risk-adjusted DNR order frequency and adherence to published guidelines.

Causes of increasing mortality in a nursing home population

OBJECTIVE

To examine the roles played by changes in case-mix, quality of care, and aggressiveness of care in explaining the 42% increase in mortality of the Medicaid nursing home population of Hennepin County, Minnesota, between 1984 and 1988.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

All nursing homes in Hennepin County, MN, that care for Medicaid patients.

PATIENTS

A random sample of 1605 Medicaid nursing home residents from 1984 and 1988 stratified by year and by whether the resident died in that year. Sampling was disproportionate to allow approximately 400 individuals per stratum. A total of 1405 charts (87%) were reviewed; the remainder were either lost or destroyed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures included case-mix (Charlson index, functional status, implicit reviewer assigned severity [range 1-4]), aggressiveness of care (orders limiting care), quality of care (process of care for tracer conditions [range 1-5], falls), and resident death.

RESULTS

Implicitly rated severity of illness worsened between 1984 and 1988 (2.77 vs 2.91; P = .009), but other measures of case-mix were unchanged. A greater percentage of residents had a DNR order in 1988 (12% in 1984 vs 37% in 1988; P < .001), and more received less aggressive care (31% vs 40%; P = .006). Overall process of care improved between 1984 and 1988 (2.88 vs 3.01; P < .05). With adjustment of the mortality rates and with logistic regression controlling for age and gender, changes in quality of care alone accounted for less than 5% of the mortality rate change between 1984 and 1988, case-mix alone accounted for 49%, and aggressiveness of care alone accounted for nearly 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The nursing home population became sicker between 1984 and 1988, but process of care improved. These changes had a modest effect on the mortality rate. The increase in less aggressive care between 1984 and 1988 accounts for nearly all of the increase in mortality.