Validating the GDS in a nursing home sample

Reversible Cognitive Frailty, Dementia, and All-Cause Mortality. The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive frailty, a condition describing the simultaneous presence of physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment, has been recently defined by an international consensus group. We estimated the predictive role of a "reversible" cognitive frailty model on incident dementia, its subtypes, and all-cause mortality in nondemented older individuals. We verified if vascular risk factors or depressive symptoms could modify this predictive role.

DESIGN

Longitudinal population-based study with 3.5- and 7-year of median follow-up.

SETTING

Eight Italian municipalities included in the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

PARTICIPANTS

In 2150 older individuals from the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging, we operationalized reversible cognitive frailty with the presence of physical frailty and pre-mild cognitive impairment subjective cognitive decline, diagnosed with a self-report measure based on item 14 of the Geriatric Depression Scale.

MEASUREMENTS

Incidence of dementia, its subtypes, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Over a 3.5-year follow-up, participants with reversible cognitive frailty showed an increased risk of overall dementia [hazard ratio (HR) 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.18], particularly vascular dementia (VaD), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.07-2.83). Over a 7-year follow-up, participants with reversible cognitive frailty showed an increased risk of overall dementia (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.12-4.03), particularly VaD, and all-cause mortality (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-2.00). Vascular risk factors and depressive symptoms did not have any effect modifier on the relationship between reversible cognitive frailty and incident dementia and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A model of reversible cognitive frailty was a short- and long-term predictor of all-cause mortality and overall dementia, particularly VaD. The absence of vascular risk factors and depressive symptoms did not modify the predictive role of reversible cognitive frailty on these outcomes.

Psychometric evaluation of a brief geriatric depression screen

This article is a psychometric evaluation of the experimental Geriatric and Extended Careline Depression Screen (GEDS) for geriatric nursing care residents. The GEDS is a five-item depression screen based on an abbreviated version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A total sample of 91 male residents over the age of 60 were recruited from a Veterans Administration Nursing Home Care Unit. The Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-SF) was used as a gold standard test to examine the convergent validity of the GEDS. The Discriminant Trait Inventory was used to assess divergent validity and the confounding effects of method variance in this research design. Test-retest reliability, redundance and omission in item content validity were systematically evaluated. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to identify the most effective cut-off score for clinical selection. Reliability was significant, but moderate. Convergent validity with the Geriatric Depression Scale was high. No items were identified as redundant. A review of literature suggested that irritability is an important factor of geriatric depression that had not been included in the original screen. The inclusion of an experimental item to assess irritability, however, did not improve the psychometric properties of the GEDS.

Validität und Reliabilität einer deutschen Version der Geriatrischen Depressionsskala (GDS)

Zusammenfassung. In diesem Artikel berichten wir über die Validität und Reliabilität einer deutschen Version der “Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)”. 43 Patienten im Alter zwischen 60 bis 87 Jahren wurden während ihres stationären Aufenthaltes auf einer psychiatrischen oder chirurgischen Station mit dem Mini-Mental-Status-Test, dem Diagnostischen Kurzinterview bei Psychischen Störungen (Mini-DIPS) und der GDS untersucht. Die GDS wies bei einem kritischen Wert von 13 Punkten die beste Sensitivität (84.0 %) und Spezifität (88.9 %) auf. Bei der 15-Item Kurzform der GDS konnte bei einem kritischen Wert von 6 die beste Sensitivität (84.0 %) und Spezifität (88.9 %) erzielt werden. Die mittlere Trennschärfe (.49), die mittlere Fragebogenschwierigkeit (P = 43), die niedrige Interitemkorrelation (r = .19) und die hohe innere Konsistenz (Cronbach alpha = .91) weisen die deutsche Version der GDS insgesamt als Fragebogen mit guten psychometrischen Eigenschaften aus.

Dementias that present with and without posterior cortical features: an important clinical distinction

There are distinct qualitative differences between the dementias that present with and without posterior cortical features. These can be utilized in dementia assessment. This paper reviews the validity and potential utility of a dichotomy based on generalized cortical (Type 1) versus isolated frontal system pathology (Type 2). These syndromes are associated with distinct differentials and problem behaviors. They may also result in different caregiving burdens or treatment responses. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is by far the most common cause of the Type 1 syndrome. Type 2 presentations select for potentially reversible non-AD conditions. Common cognitive screening instruments are insensitive to Type 2 cases. However, the Type 1/Type 2 distinction can be made reliably using qualitative clinical rating scales. We will review these instruments and discuss their application in clinical settings.