Inappropriate Medication Administration to the Acutely Ill Elderly: A Nationwide Emergency Department Study, 1992–2000

Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Blacks with Diabetes Mellitus Presenting to the Emergency Department

Background: Medication-related problems in older Blacks with diabetes mellitus (DM) are not well established. Objectives: To describe the frequency of medication-related problems in older Blacks with DM presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial evaluating Blacks aged ≥60 years of age presenting to the ED. Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, and anticholinergic score were evaluated. Results: Of 168 patients (median age = 68, range 60-92), most (n = 164, 98%) were taking ≥5 medications, and 67 (39.9%) were taking a PIM. A majority (n = 124, 74%) were taking a medication with an anticholinergic score ≥1. Number of medications was correlated with number of PIMs (r = .22, p = .004) and anticholinergic score (r = .50, p < .001). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIM use was common in older Blacks with DM.

Study protocol for IMAGE: implementing multidisciplinary assessments for geriatric patients in an emergency department observation unit, a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

BACKGROUND

Older adults in the emergency department (ED) are at high risk for functional decline, unrecognized delirium, falls, and medication interactions. Holistic assessment by a multidisciplinary team in the ED decreases these adverse outcomes and decreases admissions, but there are many barriers to incorporating this type of care during the ED visit.

METHODS

This is a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation study using a pre-/post-cohort design (n = 380) at a tertiary care academic ED with an ED observation unit (Obs Unit). The intervention is a two-step protocol of (step 1) ED nurses screening adult patients ≥ 65 years old for geriatric needs using the Delirium Triage Screen, 4-Stage Balance Test, and the Identifying Seniors at Risk score. Patients who have geriatric needs identified by this screening but who do not meet hospital admission criteria will (step 2) be placed in the Obs Unit for multidisciplinary geriatric assessment by the hospital's geriatric consultation team, physical therapists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, and/or case managers. Not all patients may require all elements of the multidisciplinary geriatric assessment. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Care Transitions Framework was used to identify barriers to implementation. Lean Six Sigma processes will be used to overcome these identified barriers with the goal of achieving geriatric screening rates of > 80%. Implementation success and associated factors will be reported. For the effectiveness aim, pre-/post-cohorts of adults ≥ 65 years old cared for in the Obs Unit will be followed for 90 days post-ED visit (n = 150 pre and 230 post). The primary outcome is the prevention of functional decline. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life, new geriatric syndromes identified, new services provided, and Obs Unit metrics such as length of stay and admission rates.

DISCUSSION

A protocol for implementing integrated multidisciplinary geriatric assessment into the ED setting has the potential to improve patient functional status by identifying and addressing geriatric issues and needs prior to discharge from the ED. Using validated frameworks and implementation strategies will increase our understanding of how to improve the quality of ED care for older adults in the acute care setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT04068311, registered 28 August 2019.

[Potentially inappropriate medication in a German practice network-who prescribes what to whom?]

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) carries the risk of increased drug side effects for older people. The prevalence data are known but no descriptive analyses of prescription behavior as a starting point for reducing PIM have yet been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze PIM prescription in the outpatient sector and to identify risk groups where increased awareness of the issue is needed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The basis for the investigation was the data set of the AOK Bavaria health insurance, which contains anonymized prescription data of a practice network for patients aged 65 years and older from 2010 to 2014. The Priscus list was used to identify the PIM.

RESULTS

There were 410,934 prescriptions during the investigation period. The prevalence of PIM was 5.60%. Family doctors prescribed 5.39% PIM and specialists for neurology, psychiatry and psychotherapy (NPP) prescribed 16.36% PIM. Regardless of the medical discipline, PIM from the drug groups psycholeptics, psychoanaleptics and antihypertensive drugs were most frequently prescribed. For men and women PIM accounted for 4.50% and 6.31%, respectively, of the prescriptions during the period. In terms of age groups older women received PIM most frequently.

CONCLUSION

In the case of specialists for NPP a high prevalence of prescriptions for PIM could be established; however, in absolute terms family doctors prescribed significantly more PIM overall. This mainly affected women and especially those between 80 and 84 years old. In the future family doctors should be made more aware with respect to the prescription of psychopharmaceuticals and antihypertensive drugs to older women.

Understanding adverse drug-related emergency department visits: development of a conceptual model through a systematic review

Background

The burden of adverse drug event (ADE)-related emergency department (ED) visits is increasing despite several preventive measures. The objective of this paper was to develop and validate a conceptual model for a better understanding of ADE-related ED visits and to guide the design and implementation of effective interventions.

Methods

The development of the model involved a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Embase databases. Studies reporting the risk factors associated with ADE-related ED visits were included. The methodological qualities of the included studies were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The model was mapped and validated using face and content validity by an expert panel. Deficiencies and targeted interventions were identified, and steps for the design and implementation were recommended.

Results

The literature search generated 1361 articles, of which 38 were included in the review; 41 risk factors associated with ADE-related ED visits were identified. All factors were mapped, and the model was validated through face and content validity. The model consisted of six concepts related to sociodemographic factors, clinical factors, ADE-related to ED visits, ADE while in the ED, outcomes, and consequences. Interventions could be targeted at the factors identified in each concept to prevent ADE-related ED burden.

Conclusion

A conceptual model to guide the successful design and implementation of strategies to prevent ADE-related ED visits and the occurrence of ADE at ED was developed. Clinicians should take these factors into consideration to prevent untoward events, especially when treating high-risk patients.

An Interdisciplinary Academic Detailing Approach to Decrease Inappropriate Medication Prescribing by Physician Residents for Older Veterans Treated in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an academic detailing intervention delivered as part of a quality improvement project by a physician-pharmacist pair on (1) self-reported confidence in prescribing for older adults and (2) rates of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed to older adults by physician residents in a Veteran Affairs emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This quality improvement project at a single site utilized a questionnaire that assessed knowledge of Beers Criteria, self-perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing in older adults, and self-rated confidence in ability to prescribe in older adults which was administered to physician residents before and after academic detailing delivered during their emergency medicine rotation. PIM rates in the resident cohort who received the academic detailing were compared to residents who did not receive the intervention.

RESULTS

Sixty-three residents received the intervention between February 2013 and December 2014. At baseline, approximately 50% of the residents surveyed reported never hearing about nor using the Beers Criteria. A significantly greater proportion of residents agreed or strongly agreed in their abilities to identify drug-disease interactions and to prescribe the appropriate medication for the older adult after receiving the intervention. The resident cohort who received the educational intervention was less likely to prescribe a PIM when compared to the untrained resident cohort with a rate ratio of 0.73 ( P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Academic detailing led by a physician-pharmacist pair resulted in improved confidence in physician residents' ability to prescribe safely in an older adult ED population and was associated with a statistically significant decrease in PIM rates.

Medication reconciliation and review for older emergency patients requires improvement in Finland

BACKGROUND:

10–30% of hospital stays by older patients are drug-related. The admission phase is important for identifying drug-related problems, but taking an incorrect medication history often leads to medication errors.

OBJECTIVES:

To enhance medication history recording and identify drug-related problems (DRPs) of older patients admitted to emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS:

DRPs were identified by pharmacists-led medication reconciliation and review procedures in two EDs in Finland; Helsinki University Hospital (HUS), and Kuopio University Hospital (KUH). One-hundred-and-fifty patients aged ≥65-years, living at home and using ≥6 medicines were studied.

RESULTS:

100% of patients (N = 75) in HUS and 99% in KUH (N = 75), had discrepancies in their admission-medication chart recorded by the nurse or physician. Associations between admission-diagnosis and drug-related problems were found in 12 patients (16%) in HUS and 22 patients (29%) in KUH. Of these, high-alert medications (e.g. antithrombotics, cytostatics, opioids) were linked to eight patients (11%) in HUS and six patients (8%) in KUH. Other acute DRPs were identified in 19 patients (25%) in HUS and 54 patients (72%) in KUH. Furthermore, 67 patients (89%) in HUS and all patients in KUH had non-acute DRPs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Medication reconciliation and review at admission of older ED patients requires improvement in Finland.

Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication to older patients presenting to the emergency department: a nationally representative population study

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) was associated with adverse clinical outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization among older patients. In order to investigate the prevalence of PIM use based on three different sets of criteria and their associated factors among older patients in the emergency department (ED) in Taiwan. The National Health Insurance Research Database was used for this cross-sectional study. Older patients who visited the ED at least once in 2009 were enrolled. PIMs were identified based on the Beers Criteria, PIM-Taiwan criteria, and PRISCUS criteria. Average patient age was 76.7 ± 7.4 years and patients visited the ED 1.8 ± 2.1 times in 2009. The prevalence and frequency of being prescribed at least one PIM at each visit were high according to all three sets of criteria. Performance of the PIM-Taiwan criteria was only inferior to that of the Beers Criteria. The most important factor associated with PIM was the number of medications prescribed in the ED, and PIM use was associated with higher annual health resource utilization in the ED. PIM use was a significant issue and was associated with higher annual emergency care resource utilization in the ED.

Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Long-Term and Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are widely used in institutionalized older adults, yet the key determinants that drive their use are incompletely characterized.

METHODS

We systematically searched published literature within MEDLINE and Embase from January 1998 to March 2017. We searched for studies conducted in the United States that described determinants of PIM use in adults ≥60 years of age in a nursing home or residential care facility, in the emergency department (ED), or in the hospital. Paired reviewers independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, assessed quality, and extracted data.

RESULTS

Among 30 included articles, 12 examined PIM use in the nursing home or residential care settings, 4 in the ED, 12 in acute care hospitals, and 2 across settings. The Beers criteria were most frequently used to identify PIM use, which ranged from 3.6% to 92.0%. Across all settings, the most common determinants of PIM use were medication burden and geographic region. In the nursing home, the most common additional determinants were younger age, and diagnoses of depression or diabetes. In both the ED and hospital, patients receiving care in the West, Midwest, and South, relative to the Northeast, were at greater risk of receiving a PIM. Very few studies examined clinician determinants of PIM use; geriatricians used fewer PIMs in the hospital than other clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, those who are on many medications are at increased risk for PIM use across multiple settings. We propose that careful testing of interventions that target modifiable determinants are indicated to assess their impact on PIM use.

Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults with dementia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults with dementia.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

United States, 2009-2010.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey household component participants aged 65 years or older identified as having dementia and using potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use as per the updated 2012 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 3.78 million older adult patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.17 million to 4.38 million) were identified as having dementia, for an overall prevalence of 4.81%. Of those patients, an estimated 1.02 million (95% CI 0.70 million to 1.30 million) were reported to use potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications, for an overall prevalence of 26.95% (95% CI 20.10% to 33.79%). The most frequently prescribed drugs were oxybutynin, solifenacin, paroxetine, tolterodine, promethazine, and cyclobenzaprine. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that those patients with the need characteristics of self-reported anxiety, mood disorders, and "fair/poor" general health status had increased odds of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use, while patients with the predisposing characteristic of being aged 75-84 years had decreased odds of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use.

CONCLUSION

More than one in four older adults with dementia were found to use potentially inappropriate anticholinergics. Given the adverse cognitive effects of these medications, there is a strong need to monitor and optimize their use in older adult patients with dementia.

Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults: a national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate medications are often used in older adults despite their unfavourable risk-to-benefit profile. Although many of the medications in the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers list are potentially inappropriate because of their anticholinergic properties, little is known regarding the nature and extent of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of, and factors associated with, potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in the older population.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted, involving older adults (aged 65 years and older), using 2009-2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. The 2012 AGS Beers Criteria were used to define potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications on the basis of the list of medications to avoid using in older adults irrespective of the diagnosis. Descriptive analyses were used to examine the nature and extent of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use. Multivariable logistic regression within the conceptual framework of the Andersen Behavioral Model was used to identify the factors associated with potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use in older adults.

RESULTS

According to the MEPS, there were 78.60 million older adults in the USA; an estimated 7.51 million (9.56 %) of these older adults used potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications in 2009-2010. The most frequently used potentially inappropriate anticholinergics were cyclobenzaprine, promethazine, amitriptyline, hydroxyzine and dicyclomine. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that female sex, residing in the South and the presence of anxiety disorder increased the likelihood of receiving potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications, whereas older adults aged 75-84 or ≥ 85 years, and those with over 15 years of education, had a decreased likelihood of receiving potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications.

CONCLUSION

The study found that approximately one in ten older adults used potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. Several predisposing, enabling and need factors were associated with the use of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. Concerted efforts are needed to optimize potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults.

Impact of Clinical Pharmacy Specialists on the Design and Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Inappropriate Medications in a Veterans Affairs Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

As the proportion of older adult patients who interface with the health care system grows, clinical pharmacy specialists (CPS) have a pivotal role in reducing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) describe CPS involvement in the design and implementation of a quality improvement (QI) initiative to decrease PIM prescribing in a Veterans Affairs (VA) emergency department (ED) and (b) report on changes in PIM prescribing before and after the initiative.

METHODS

Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Veterans Discharged from the Emergency Department (EQUiPPED) is an ongoing multisite QI project that aims to decrease ED PIM prescribing. We used a mixed-method approach that applied qualitative and quantitative measures in describing the CPS role and evaluating PIM rates. PIMs were defined using the 2012 Beers Criteria. We reported monthly PIM rates in patients aged 65 years and older who were discharged from the ED from January 2012 to November 2014. A piecewise, nonlinear regression model evaluated the pattern in PIM prescriptions over time.

RESULTS

At the Durham, North Carolina, VA Medical Center, a total of 4 CPS were involved with tailoring the design and implementation of the EQUiPPED intervention for local use. CPS input led to 3 key innovations: academic detailing performed by a physician-CPS pair, medication alert messages identifying medications as PIMs in the computerized patient record system, and automated reports describing the frequency and type of PIMs prescribed by each ED provider. Between February 2013 and November 2014, 73 ED providers received the academic detailing. The ED facility experienced a relative reduction of 47.5% in the rate of PIM prescribing over the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

This QI project resulted in a meaningful decrease in PIM prescribing in older ED adults. CPS contributions to QI can extend beyond pharmacotherapy and provider education to also include information technology tools using formulary management expertise.

Conceptualizing and measuring potentially inappropriate drug therapy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Elderly people are the principal consumers of prescription drugs. The more the medication used by the patient, the greater the likelihood there is of the patient being subjected to potentially inappropriate drug therapy (PIDT). PIDT has been measured in the literature with both implicit and explicit tools. The purpose of this review was to assess the use of tools to detect PIDT in various studies and to determine which terms are used to refer to PIDT in practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the following steps: the first was identification. In this step, studies were selected from different combinations of the descriptors 'aged', 'elderly', 'inappropriate prescribing' and 'drug utilization' in three different languages, using the Embase, Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Second, the papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria for data extraction were carefully examined by three evaluators to determine the tools used and terms that referred to PIDT.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

From the combinations of keywords, 8610 articles were found. At the end of the selection process, 119 of the articles complied with the specified criteria. The degree of agreement among evaluators was moderate for the study titles (κ1  = 0·479) and substantial for abstracts (κ2  = 0·647). With respect to the PIDT evaluation criteria used by the studies, 27·7% used two criteria. Of the 27 evaluation criteria identified, the Beers criteria were used by 82·3% of the studies. More than 50 different terms to identify PIDT were found in the literature.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This review is the first study to conceptualize and discuss terms that refer to PIDT. At present, there is no consensus regarding terms used to refer to PIDT, with over 50 different terms currently in use. This review shows an increase in the number of articles aimed at evaluating PIDT using implicit and explicit tools.

Frequency and types of the medication errors in an academic emergency department in Iran: The emergent need for clinical pharmacy services in emergency departments

Objective:

Emergency departments (EDs) are characterized by simultaneous care of multiple patients with various medical conditions. Due to a large number of patients with complex diseases, speed and complexity of medication use, working in under-staffing and crowded environment, medication errors are commonly perpetrated by emergency care providers. This study was designed to evaluate the incidence of medication errors among patients attending to an ED in a teaching hospital in Iran.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 500 patients attending to ED were randomly assessed for incidence and types of medication errors. Some factors related to medication errors such as working shift, weekdays and schedule of the educational program of trainee were also evaluated.

Findings:

Nearly, 22% of patients experienced at least one medication error. The rate of medication errors were 0.41 errors per patient and 0.16 errors per ordered medication. The frequency of medication errors was higher in men, middle age patients, first weekdays, night-time work schedules and the first semester of educational year of new junior emergency medicine residents. More than 60% of errors were prescription errors by physicians and the remaining were transcription or administration errors by nurses. More than 35% of the prescribing errors happened during the selection of drug dose and frequency. The most common medication errors by nurses during the administration were omission error (16.2%) followed by unauthorized drug (6.4%). Most of the medication errors happened for anticoagulants and thrombolytics (41.2%) followed by antimicrobial agents (37.7%) and insulin (7.4%).

Conclusion:

In this study, at least one-fifth of the patients attending to ED experienced medication errors resulting from multiple factors. More common prescription errors happened during ordering drug dose and frequency. More common administration errors included dug omission or unauthorized drug.

Using pharmacists to optimize patient outcomes and costs in the ED

Participation of hospital clinical pharmacists in the care of inpatients is widespread, often encouraged by the dicta promulgated by regulatory bodies. For years, clinical pharmacists have ventured out of the pharmacy to participate in rounds and, otherwise, in the care of patients on hospital floors and in intensive care units. In fact, it has been well documented in many research studies published in the last 20 years that having pharmacists prospectively involved with orders generates significant cost savings for the hospital and benefit to patients. Until recently, the emergency department (ED) seemed to be a hectic environment that would be inhospitable to the careful, meticulous, and usually deliberate process of many clinical pharmacists. The potential benefits were recognized, but the pace and costs seemed prohibitive. The addition of pharmacists in the ED has reduced medication errors and provided numerous other benefits that will be discussed in this article. We will show that recent data indicate that using an ED clinical pharmacist promotes patient safety and is cost-effective.

Care of the older adult in the emergency department: nurses views of the pressing issues

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to describe nurses' views of the issues to be addressed to improve care of the older adult in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN AND METHODS

An exploratory content analysis examined the qualitative responses of 527 registered nurses from 49 U.S. hospitals who completed the Geriatric Institutional Profile.

RESULTS

5 central themes emerged from the analysis, representing a lack of older person hospital environment fit in the ED: (a) respect for the older adult and carers, (b) correct and best procedures and treatment, (c) time and staff to do things right, (d) transitions, and (e) a safe and enabling environment. The nurses offered solutions to address lack of fit, including modifications to the social climate, policies and procedures, care systems and processes, and physical design.

IMPLICATIONS

The nurses' descriptions of the pressing issues surrounding care of older adults in the ED provide useful information to consider when developing a senior-friendly ED. Results also illuminate solutions that can be taken to address issues. These solutions give direction for future intervention research.

Is geriatric care associated with less emergency department use?

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether community-dwelling individuals and nursing home (NH) residents treated by a geriatrician were less likely to use the emergency department (ED) than individuals treated by other physicians.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using data from a national sample of older adults with a history of cardiovascular disease.

SETTING

Ambulatory care or NH.

PARTICIPANTS

Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older diagnosed with one or more geriatric conditions from 2004 to 2007 and followed for up to 3 years.

MEASUREMENTS

Emergency department use was measured in Medicare inpatient and outpatient claims; geriatric care was measured as geriatrician visits in ambulatory or NH settings coded in physician claims.

RESULTS

Multivariable analyses controlled for observed and unobserved subject characteristics that were constant during the study period. For community-dwelling participants, one or more nonhospital geriatrician visits in a 6-month period were associated with 11.3% lower ED use the following month (95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.5-15.0, N = 287,259). Participants who received primary care from geriatricians were less likely to have ED use than those who had traditional primary care. Results for participants who received consultative care from geriatricians were similar to those for participants who received primary care from geriatricians. Results for NH residents (N = 66,551) were similar to those for community-dwelling participants.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric care was associated with an estimated 108 fewer ED visits per 1,000 community-dwelling residents and 133 fewer ED visits per 1,000 NH residents per year. Geriatric consultative care in collaboration with primary care providers may be as effective in reducing ED use as geriatric primary care. Increased provision of collaborative care could allow the existing supply of geriatricians to reach a larger number of individuals.

Perfil de uso de medicamentos por idosos assistidos pelo Programa de Atenção ao Idoso (P.A.I.) da UNIJUÍ

O processo de envelhecimento é caracterizado por várias modificações no organismo, que podem causar alterações no efeito de certos medicamentos, tornando-os inapropriados para idosos por falta de eficácia terapêutica ou por apresentarem efeitos adversos superiores aos benefícios. O objetivo do estudo foi identificar os medicamentos utilizados pelos idosos assistidos pelo Programa de Atenção ao Idoso (P.A.I.) e investigar o uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados nessa população. Realizou-se estudo quantitativo e descritivo, com coleta de dados secundários, a partir de prontuários/cadastros dos idosos atendidos pelo P.A.I. (Projeto de Extensão Universitária da UNIJUÍ). Entre os idosos cadastrados, 16 receberam e/ou estão recebendo acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico pela equipe da farmácia, sendo 11 mulheres, com idade média de 75,2 ± 7,5 anos. Cada idoso recebe em média 7,3 ± 3,3 medicamentos. A polifarmácia foi verificada em 15 idosos. Entre os 117 medicamentos em uso, considerando-se repetições, 13 são inapropriados para idosos, destacando-se diazepam e fluoxetina, cada um utilizado por três idosos. Verifica-se que é imprescindível reduzir o uso de medicamentos inapropriados para melhorar a qualidade de vida dos idosos. É necessária a colaboração do prescritor e do profissional farmacêutico, que é responsável por avaliar a prescrição, identificar riscos relacionados à terapêutica e intervir através da comunicação com o prescritor responsável, fornecendo informações e sugestões que facilitem a utilização de serviços de saúde.

Guided medication dosing for elderly emergency patients using real-time, computerized decision support

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a real-time computerized decision support tool in the emergency department that guides medication dosing for the elderly on physician ordering behavior and on adverse drug events (ADEs).

DESIGN

A prospective controlled trial was conducted over 26 weeks. The status of the decision support tool alternated OFF (7/17/06-8/29/06), ON (8/29/06-10/10/06), OFF (10/10/06-11/28/06), and ON (11/28/06-1/16/07) in consecutive blocks during the study period. In patients ≥65 who were ordered certain benzodiazepines, opiates, non-steroidals, or sedative-hypnotics, the computer application either adjusted the dosing or suggested a different medication. Physicians could accept or reject recommendations.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome compared medication ordering consistent with recommendations during ON versus OFF periods. Secondary outcomes included the admission rate, emergency department length of stay for discharged patients, 10-fold dosing orders, use of a second drug to reverse the original medication, and rate of ADEs using previously validated explicit chart review.

RESULTS

2398 orders were placed for 1407 patients over 1548 visits. The majority (49/53; 92.5%) of recommendations for alternate medications were declined. More orders were consistent with dosing recommendations during ON (403/1283; 31.4%) than OFF (256/1115; 23%) periods (p≤0.0001). 673 (43%) visits were reviewed for ADEs. The rate of ADEs was lower during ON (8/237; 3.4%) compared with OFF (31/436; 7.1%) periods (p=0.02). The remaining secondary outcomes showed no difference.

LIMITATIONS

Single institution study, retrospective chart review for ADEs.

CONCLUSION

Though overall agreement with recommendations was low, real-time computerized decision support resulted in greater acceptance of medication recommendations. Fewer ADEs were observed when computerized decision support was active.

Physician and nurse acceptance of technicians to screen for geriatric syndromes in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate emergency medicine physician and nurse acceptance of nonnurse, nonphysician screening for geriatric syndromes.

METHODS

This was a single-center emergency department (ED) survey of physicians and nurses after an 8-month project. Geriatric technicians were paid medical student research assistants evaluating consenting ED patients older than 65 years for cognitive dysfunction, fall risk, or functional decline. The primary objective of this anonymous survey was to evaluate ED nurse and physician perceptions about the geriatric screener feasibility and barriers to implementation. In addition, as a secondary objective, respondents reported ongoing geriatric screening efforts independent of the research screeners.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 72% of physicians and 33% of nurses. Most nurses and physicians identified geriatric technicians as beneficial to patients without impeding ED throughput. Fewer than 25% of physicians routinely screen for any geriatric syndromes. Nurses evaluated for fall risk significantly more often than physicians, but no other significant differences were noted in ongoing screening efforts.

CONCLUSION

Dedicated geriatric technicians are perceived by nurses and physicians as beneficial to patients with the potential to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes. Most nurses and physicians are not currently screening for any geriatric syndromes.

Comparison of prescribing criteria in hospitalised Australian elderly

The Beers criteria (2003) and McLeod criteria (1997) have been applied internationally to quantify inappropriate prescribing in elderly populations. Similarly, guidelines have been published locally by the National Prescribing Service (NPS).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to adapt, evaluate and compare the utility of these three established criteria in measuring prescribing appropriateness in a sample of hospitalised elderly patients.

METHODS

Initial refinement of the criteria produced versions applicable to Australian practice. Inpatient records of 202 patients aged 65 years or older in six wards of the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, were reviewed using the adapted criteria. 'Potentially inappropriate' prescribing was descriptively analysed using relevant denominators.

RESULTS

The adapted criteria collectively listed 70 'potentially inappropriate' medicines or drug groups and 116 'potentially inappropriate' prescribing practices. Patients (mean age 80.0; SD=8.3 years) were prescribed, a median of eight medicines (SD=4.0). At least one 'potentially inappropriate' medicine was identified in 110 (55%) patients. 'Potentially inappropriate' prescribing practices averaged 1.1 per patient (range 1-6). The adapted Beers criteria identified more 'potentially inappropriate' medicines/practices (44%, 101/232) than the McLeod criteria (41%) and NPS criteria (16%). Aspirin, benzodiazepines, beta-blockers and dipyridamole were most commonly identified.

CONCLUSION

The Beers and McLeod criteria, developed internationally, required considerable modification for local prescribing. The three criteria differed in their focus and approaches, such that development and validation of national criteria, using the key features of these models, is recommended. There is potential to apply validated guidelines in clinical practice and review of prescribing, but only to supplement clinical judgement.

Potentially inappropriate medication utilization in the emergency department visits by older adults: analysis from a nationally representative sample

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the frequency of administration of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) to older emergency department (ED) patients and to examine recent trends in the rates of PIM usage.

METHODS

The data examined during the study were obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). This study utilized the nationally representative ED data from 2000-2006 NHAMCS surveys. Our sample included older adults (age 65 years and greater) who were treated in the ED and discharged home. Estimated frequencies of PIM-associated ED visits were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to assess demographic, clinical, and hospital factors associated with PIM administration and to assess temporal trends.

RESULTS

Approximately 19.5 million patients, or 16.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=16.1% to 17.4%) of eligible ED visits, were associated with one or more PIMs. The five most common PIMs were promethazine, ketorolac, propoxyphene, meperidine, and diphenhydramine. The total number of medications prescribed or administered during the ED visit was most strongly associated with PIM use. Other covariates associated with PIM use included rural location outside of the Northeast, being seen by a staff physician only (and not by a resident or intern), presenting with an injury, and the combination of female sex and age 65-74 years. There was a small but significant decrease in the proportion of visits associated with a PIM over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially inappropriate medication administration in the ED remains common. Given rising concerns about preventable complications of medical care, this area may be of high priority for intervention. Substantial regional and hospital type (teaching versus nonteaching) variability appears to exist.

Trends of the potentially inappropriate medication consumption over 10 years in older adults in the East of France

PURPOSE

To describe the trends of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older adults from 1995 to 2004 in the East of France, by using the 1997 Beers criteria and its French update, and to assess risk factors for this PIM use.

METHODS

We carried out a repeated cross-sectional study using data collected among people aged >/=65 years, examined in the Center for Preventive Medicine. Studied variables were socio-demographic, clinical data, medication consumption and the self-health status. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to estimate the temporal changes in PIM rate.

RESULTS

30 683 participants were included. 51.2% were women. The mean age was 70.1 +/- 4.3 years [65-99]. The annual overall rate of PIM use decreased significantly during the study period. These rates range from 14.9% in 1995 to 9.0% in 2004 according the Beers criteria (-3.4% per year) and from 33.5% in 1995 to 19.3% in 2004 according to the French update criteria (-3.6% per year). The annual rate of medication users increased during the same period (+0.75% per year). The risk of PIM consumption increased with age, number of drugs and frequency of the visits to the physician (OR = 1.26 [1.18-1.35]). This risk was also higher among women (OR = 1.29 [1.18-1.40]), elderly living alone (OR = 1.09 [1.02-1.17]) and with those with low education level (OR = 1.19 [1.02-1.38]).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a decrease in PIM consumption. Despite an increase of drug use in the elderly, an improving of the quality of this consumption remains possible.

The effect of systematic medication review in elderly patients admitted to an acute ward of internal medicine

Elderly patients are vulnerable to medication errors and adverse drug events due to increased morbidity, polypharmacy and inappropriate interactions. The objective of this study was to investigate whether systematic medication review and counselling performed by a clinical pharmacist and clinical pharmacologist would reduce length of in-hospital stay in elderly patients admitted to an acute ward of internal medicine. A randomized, controlled study of 100 patients aged 70 years or older was conducted in an acute ward of internal medicine in Denmark. Intervention arm: a clinical pharmacist conducted systematic medication reviews after an experienced medical physician had prescribed the patients' medication. Information was collected from medical charts, interview with the patients and database registrations of drug purchase. Subsequently, medication histories were conferred with a clinical pharmacologist and advisory notes recommending medication changes were completed. Physicians were not obliged to comply with the recommendations. Control arm: medication was reviewed by usual routine in the ward. Primary end-point was length of in-hospital stay. In addition, readmissions, mortality, contact to primary healthcare and quality of life were measured at 3-month follow-up. In the intervention arm, the mean length of in-hospital stay was 239.9 hr (95% CI: 190.2-289.6) and in the control arm: 238.6 hr (95% CI: 137.6-339.6), which was neither a statistical significant nor a clinically relevant difference. Moreover, no differences were observed for any of the secondary end-points. Systematic medication review and medication counselling did not show any effect on in-hospital length of stay in elderly patients when admitted to an acute ward of internal medicine.

Prevalence of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits by elderly patients covered by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance program

BACKGROUND

The use of potentially inappropriate medications can have profound medical consequences for elderly patients and place a substantial burden on the health care system.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing at ambulatory care visits by patients aged > or =65 years covered by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance program, to examine the characteristics of and risk factors for such prescribing, and to investigate its influence on health care resource utilization.

METHODS

Ambulatory care visits by patients aged > or =65 years in 2001-2004 were identified from the National Health Insurance claims database. The 2003 Beers criteria for drugs to be avoided in the elderly were used to identify potentially inappropriate medications prescribed at these visits. Only drugs with the potential to lead to higher-severity adverse events were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits. Independent variables in the regression model included patient characteristics (eg, sex, age), physician characteristics (sex, age, and specialty), and visit characteristics (site and prescribed drug number). The dependent variable was visits that included a prescription for a potentially inappropriate medication.

RESULTS

Overall, 176,661,994 ambulatory care visits by patients aged > or =65 years were identified in 2001-2004. Of these, 19.1% involved a prescription for a potentially inappropriate medication. Although the frequency of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing declined over the study period, 62.5% of elderly patients were exposed to such medications in 2004. The only patient characteristic associated with an increased likelihood of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications was female sex (male sex: odds ratio [OR] = 0.982 [95% CI, 0.980-0.983], P < 0.001). Physician characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications was male sex (OR = 1.206 [95% CI, 1.202-1.210], P < 0.001); older age (43-50 years: OR = 1.021 [95% CI, 1.018-1.025], P < 0.001; >/=51 years: OR = 1.238 [95% CI, 1.235-1.242], P < 0.001); and family medicine/general practice (OR = 1.267 [95% CI, 1.265-1.269], P < 0.001). For visit characteristics, significant associations were found with visits to a primary care clinic (OR = 1.887 [95% CI, 1.881-1.892], P < 0.001) and the number of drugs prescribed (4-6 drugs: OR = 2.701 [95% CI, 2.696-2.706], P < 0.001; > or =7 drugs: OR = 4.528 [95% CI, 4.517-4.538], P < 0.001). The most commonly prescribed types of potentially inappropriate medications were antihistamines (4.8% of all prescriptions in 48.3% of elderly patients), muscle relaxants/antispasmodics (4.0% and 40.3%, respectively), and long-acting benzodiazepines (2.4% and 21.4%). In 2004, the mean number of ambulatory care visits per patient was significantly higher among those who received potentially inappropriate medications compared with those who did not (30.78 vs 16.57, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients who received potentially inappropriate medications also had significantly more emergency department visits (0.27 vs 0.15; P < 0.001) and hospital admissions (0.46 vs 0.27; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a high prevalence of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits by elderly patients in Taiwan in 2001-2004.

Pharmacists' and pharmacy students' ability to identify drug-related problems using TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review)

OBJECTIVE

Determine the effectiveness of TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review) in helping pharmacists and pharmacy students identify drug-related problems during patient medication reviews.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled study design, geriatric patient cases were sent to 136 pharmacists and 108 third-year pharmacy students who were asked to identify drug related-problems (DRPs) with and without using TIMER.

RESULTS

Pharmacists identified more tool-related DRPs using TIMER (p = 0.027). Pharmacy students identified more tool-related DRPs using TIMER in the first case (p = 0.02), but not in the second.

CONCLUSION

TIMER increased the number of DRPs identified by practicing pharmacists and pharmacy students during medication reviews of hypothetical patient cases.

Is there an association between inappropriate prescription drug use and adherence in discharged elderly patients?

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate prescription drug (IPD) use is very common among older patients. However, its impact on medication continuity and adherence after hospitalization has not been researched, with little known regarding readmissions and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients discharged with IPDs and examine whether use of these drugs is related to medication continuity and adherence 1 month postdischarge as well as to readmissions and mortality 3 months postdischarge.

METHODS

Clinical and demographic data, postdischarge medication modification, and adherence were prospectively obtained on interview of 212 unselected elderly (aged > or = 65 y) patients or, if necessary, their caregivers. Nonadherence was defined as the percentage of drug doses less than or equal to 70% or greater than or equal to 110%. Medication appropriateness was assessed retrospectively using the Beers' criteria.

RESULTS

Use of IPDs occurred in 43.5% and 44.4% of patients on admission and discharge, respectively. At discharge, the numbers of IPDs and prescribed drugs were correlated (R = 0.39; p < 0.01). No relationship was found between IPDs at discharge and age, sex, functional and cognitive status, number of chronic diseases, and reason for admission. Sixty percent of patients who were nonadherent to at least one drug had at least one IPD, compared with 37.4% of the adherent patients (p = 0.008). Nonadherence to at least one drug increased as the number of IPDs on discharge increased (p = 0.004). No relationship was found between IPD use and postdischarge medication modifications, readmissions, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A high number of hospitalized elderly patients are discharged with IPDs that are directly correlated with the number of prescribed drugs at discharge and postdischarge nonadherence. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of postdischarge IPD use on health outcome, and healthcare providers should work to decrease its prevalence.

Potentially inappropriate medication for emergency department visits by elderly patients in Taiwan

PURPOSE

The potential for adverse drug events caused by potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in elderly patients at emergency department (ED) visits is a growing concern. The objects of this study were to determine the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of PIM use among elderly ED visits in Taiwan.

METHODS

The nationwide computerized claims database of elderly ED visits under the National Health Insurance (NHI) in Taiwan during 2001-2004 was accessed. PIM, independent of diseases diagnoses or conditions and should be generally be avoided in elderly people, was evaluated using the updated 2003 Beers criteria.

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2004, 14.7% of total 1 429 463 elderly ED visits with prescriptions had PIM, and 19.3% of elderly people who visited ED received at least one PIM annually. Odds ratio for PIM prescriptions to ED elderly was higher for visits at which more drugs were prescribed, visits at local community hospital, female and older physicians, patients aged 65-69 years and female patients. Common PIM categories were short acting nifedipine, muscle relaxants and anti-spasmodics, antihistamines and ketorolac. When health care resource utilization was compared in 2004, subjects receiving PIM at ED visit had significantly more mean ambulatory care visits, ED visits and hospital admissions than subjects who did not receive PIM.

CONCLUSIONS

About one fifth of elderly people who visited ED received PIM annually in Taiwan. The public and physicians should be educated, and a computerized drug surveillance system might be needed to avoid PIM prescriptions to the ED elderly patients.

Current treatments for sleep disturbances in individuals with dementia

Sleep disturbances are widespread among older adults. Degenerative neurologic disorders that cause dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, exacerbate age-related changes in sleep, as do many common comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions. Medications used to treat chronic illness and insomnia have many side effects that can further disrupt sleep and place patients at risk for injury. This article reviews the neurophysiology of sleep in normal aging and sleep changes associated with common dementia subtypes and comorbid conditions. Current pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic evidence-based treatment options are discussed, including the use of light therapy, increased physical and social activity, and multicomponent cognitive-behavioral interventions for improving sleep in institutionalized and community-dwelling adults with dementia.

National study on the frequency, types, causes, and consequences of voluntarily reported emergency department medication errors

BACKGROUND

Medication errors contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, and costs to the health system. Little is known about the characteristics of Emergency Department (ED) medication errors.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine the frequency, types, causes, and consequences of voluntarily reported ED medication errors in the United States.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of all ED errors reported to the MEDMARX system between 2000 and 2004. MEDMARX is an anonymous, confidential, de-identified, Internet-accessible medication error-reporting program designed to allow hospitals to report, track, and share error data in a standardized format.

RESULTS

There were 13,932 medication errors from 496 EDs analyzed. The error rate was 78 reports per 100,000 visits. Physicians were responsible for 24% of errors, nurses for 54%. Errors most commonly occurred in the administration phase (36%). The most common type of error was improper dose/quantity (18%). Leading causes were not following procedure/protocol (17%), and poor communication (11%), whereas contributing factors were distractions (7.5%), emergency situations (4.1%), and workload increase (3.4%). Computerized provider order entry caused 2.5% of errors. Harm resulted in 3% of errors. Actions taken as a result of the error included informing the staff member who committed the error (26%), enhancing communication (26%), and providing additional training (12%). Patients or family members were notified about medication errors 2.7% of the time.

CONCLUSION

ED medication errors may be a result of the acute, crowded, and fast-paced nature of care. Further research is needed to identify interventions to reduce these risks and evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.

Potentially inappropriate medications and adverse drug effects in elders in the ED

The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential adverse drug effects (ADEs) in older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). This was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of adults 65 years and older presenting to the ED at an urban, tertiary care hospital. Potentially inappropriate medications were defined according to 2003 Beers criteria. Potential ADEs were defined as either (1) a potential drug-drug interaction, (2) alternative medication likely to cause toxicity or drug interactions, or (3) toxic doses of vitamins or minerals. Of 174 eligible patients, 124 were enrolled. The mean number of medications used per patient was 8.6 (range, 0-20). Thirty six patients (29%, 95% confidence interval, 27%-37%) presented to the ED with at least one PIM. Eight PIMs were prescribed in the ED, representing 16% of all prescriptions in the ED. Potential ADEs meeting the defined criteria were found in 26.6% of patients. A subanalysis of a random sample of charts revealed significant discordance between medication lists obtained by the research assistants and that of the health care providers. Older ED patients are at high risk for use of potentially inappropriate medications and ADEs. This problem may be magnified by inaccurate medication lists obtained by ED providers. A larger multicenter study may help to better define the scope of this problem.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing for the elderly: effects of geriatric care at the patient and health care system level

BACKGROUND

Many studies have identified patient characteristics associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly (PIPE), however, little attention has been directed toward how health care system factors such as geriatric care may affect this patient safety issue.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the association between geriatric care and PIPE in a community dwelling elderly population.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Cross-sectional retrospective database study.

SUBJECTS

Veterans age > or =65 years who received health care in the VA system during Fiscal Years (FY99-00), and also received at medications from the Veterans Administration in FY00.

MEASURES

PIPE was identified using the Zhan adaptation of the Beers criteria. Geriatric care penetration was calculated as the proportion of patients within a facility who received at least 1 geriatric outpatient clinic or inpatient visit.

ANALYSES

Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between geriatric care and PIPE after controlling for patient and health care system characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients receiving geriatric care were less likely to have PIPE exposure (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.73). There was also a weak effect for geriatric care penetration, with a trend for patients in low geriatric care penetration facilities having higher risk for PIPE regardless of individual geriatric care exposure (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Although geriatric care is associated with a lower risk of PIPE, additional research is needed to determine if heterogeneity in the organization and delivery of geriatric care resulted in the weak effect of geriatric care penetration, or whether this is a result of low power.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized elders

BACKGROUND

Prescribing of potentially harmful medications has not been well documented in hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the rate of and factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing in a large inpatient sample.

DESIGN

The study was a retrospective cohort of the period between September 1, 2002, and June 30, 2005. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient, physician, and hospital characteristics associated with PIM prescribing.

SETTING

The study collected data from 384 US hospitals.

PATIENTS

The sample was composed of patients aged >or=65 years admitted with 1 or more of 7 common medical diagnoses.

MEASUREMENTS

The percentage of patients prescribed PIMs as defined using a modified Beers list was measured. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for PIM use were computed.

RESULTS

Of the 493,971 patients, 49% received at least 1 PIM, and 6% received 3 or more, most commonly promethazine, diphenhydramine, and propoxyphene. Patient, physician, and hospital characteristics were all associated with PIM use. Patients with myocardial infarction or heart failure were most likely (61% and 52% vs. 46% for pneumonia), men (47% vs. 49% for women) and those in managed care plans (44% vs. 49% for other plans) were less likely, and patients >or=85 years were least likely (42% vs. 53% for patients aged 65-74 years) to receive PIMs (P < .0001 for all comparisons). For high-severity PIMs, internists and hospitalists had similar prescribing rates (33%), cardiologists had a higher rate (48%), and geriatricians had the lowest rate (24%). The proportion of elders receiving PIMs ranged from 34% in the Northeast to 55% in the South, and variation at the individual hospital level was extreme. At 7 hospitals, PIMs were never prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variation in the use of PIMs is associated with hospital and physician characteristics. Care may be improved by minimizing this non-patient-centered variation.

The elderly in the emergency department: a critical review of problems and solutions

The elderly are an ever increasing population in overcrowded emergency departments (EDs) in many countries. They have multiple health problems and consume more time and resources than younger patients. They are more frequently admitted and experience adverse outcomes after they are discharged from the ED. These frail patients could require specific skills, instruments and organisational models of emergency care in order to look after their complex needs. As such, several approaches have been tried and tested to improve emergency care for them. This article analyses the epidemiological load and problems faced when confronted with elder ED patients. We critically review organisational models, clinical approaches and methodologies in order to reduce ED physicians' difficulties and to improve quality of care and outcomes for elder patients. Triage, clinical assessment and discharge are identified as critical moments during an emergency care process, and interesting and useful instruments are proposed as possible solutions.

Risk factors for self-reported adverse drug events among Medicare enrollees

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug events (ADEs) occur in older adults. ADEs occur in up to 6.5% of all hospitalized patients and outpatients, and about 28% of these events are preventable. The proportion of outpatients with an ADE ranges from 5% to 35%, depending on the exact definition used. There is a critical need to examine the risk factors associated with having an ADE to increase awareness about medication safety among older adults.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the association between risk factors such as the number of pharmacies used by patients and their concern and necessity beliefs about medicines, and self-reported ADEs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional Internet survey was administered by Harris Interactive. Harris Interactive asked individuals from their online panel who were 65 years of age or older, US residents, and enrolled in Medicare to complete the survey. A convenience sample of 1220 anonymous surveys was obtained. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. The dependent variable was self-reported ADEs, defined as the patient's visiting a physician to report an unwanted reaction or medicine problem in the past year. Independent variables included sociodemographics, self-rated health, number of medications, sum of symptoms experienced, concern and necessity beliefs about medicines, number of pharmacies, and whether subjects skipped doses of their medications to save money or stopped taking the drugs due to cost.

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of respondents reported an ADE. ADEs were related to being female (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.33), number of pharmacies (OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.56 to 7.41), number of symptoms experienced (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.87 to 6.14), concern beliefs about medicines (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.20), and having a graduate academic degree (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.36).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of pharmacies, concern beliefs about medicines, and number of symptoms experienced in the past month were associated with self-reported ADEs. Discussing patients' beliefs about their drug therapy with them is likely to affect their expectations and interpretation of symptoms, as well as future attributions regarding drug therapy.

Inappropriate prescribing in an older ED population

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIMs) use in older emergency department (ED) patients based on the updated 2002 Beers criteria. This was a retrospective analysis of 352 consecutive ED visits by patients aged 65 years and older. The mean number of medications taken was 8.4 per patient. In the study population, 111 (32%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27-36) of 352 patients were taking at least 1 PIM at ED presentation. Propoxyphene/acetaminophen (24/352, 7%; 95% CI, 4-10), muscle relaxants (14/352, 4%; 95% CI, 2-7), and antihistamines (12/352, 3%; 95% CI, 2-6) were the most common PIMs. Among 101 of 193 patients discharged home from the ED with a new prescription, 13 (13%; 95% CI, 6-19) were also given PIMs. The most common PIMs were propoxyphene/acetaminophen (3/101; 95% CI, 1-8), diazepam (3/101; 95% CI, 1-8), cyclobenzaprine (2/101, 2%; 95% CI, 0-7), and diphenhydramine (2/101, 2%; 95% CI, 0-7). Outpatient PIM use in older ED patients is highly prevalent. Further education is needed regarding prescribing practices in this population group.

Propoxyphene prescribing among populations older and younger than age 65 in a tertiary care hospital

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the proportion of patients aged 65 years and older who are prescribed propoxyphene (PP) versus those aged 65 and younger.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary care facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients admitted to the hospital between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2005, and prescribed either hydrocodone (HC) or PP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome measure was the proportion of PP orders prescribed for patients older versus younger than age 65. The secondary outcomes were to identify other variables occurring in higher proportions among patients who were prescribed PP versus HC.

RESULTS

Of the 7,910 patients reviewed, 7,295 patients 92.2% were prescribed HC and 615 (7.8%) were prescribed PP. In a random sample of 1,065 patients, the prescribing pattern of PP for subjects > or =65 (221/615, 35.9%), was significantly higher than for HC (128/450, 28.4%), P = 0.0122. In a random selection of the larger sample, there were 44/108 (40.7%) in the PP group and 22/120 subjects (18.3%) > or =65 in the HC group (P = 0.0003). Among PP users, there was a higher percentage of females (P = 0.0150), more subjects with narcotic allergies (P < 0.0001), and more subjects with a history of fractures (P = 0.0232).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nationally reported data, the rate of PP prescribing is relatively low. However, despite the recommendation to avoid the use of PP in elderly patients, its use occurs in a higher proportion of patients age 65 years or older than in younger patients. Studies evaluating the prescribing rates of potentially inappropriate medications should be put in context by comparing reported data with that of a younger cohort.

Propoxyphene (dextropropoxyphene): a critical review of a weak opioid analgesic that should remain in antiquity

Propoxyphene (dextropropoxyphene) is a synthetic weak opioid introduced into the United States in 1957. It is most frequently prescribed in combination with acetaminophen and/or aspirin. After its ubiquitous introductory phase, it was soon discovered that this drug's iatrogenic events (cardiotoxicity, seizures, etc.) far outweighed any perceived therapeutic benefit. Propoxyphene analgesia was equated with that of merely acetaminophen or aspirin independently. The propoxyphenes euphorigenic component has created a problem in its prescribing. Use of this agent in the elderly should be avoided because of its complex pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacology of this drug are discussed thoroughly in this article, including its arrhythmogenicity. Additional noncardiovascular pharmacotherapies that produce QTc prolongation or arrhythmogenicity are described. A list of the cytochrome P450 2D6 pharmacotherapies that will interact with propoxyphene is provided in the article. The use of this agent is highly discouraged. The rationale for this is discussed fully within this article. The toxicity of this drug is partially related to nor-propoxyphene a non-opioid cardiotoxic metabolite. The mere warnings of fatalities within the package insert should alert any cautious prescriber on the dangers of this agent and dampen its prescribing potential.

Is inappropriate medication use a major cause of adverse drug reactions in the elderly?

AIM

To study the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) linked to inappropriate medication (IM) use in elderly people admitted to an acute medical geriatric unit.

METHODS

All the elderly people aged > or = 70 years admitted to the acute medical geriatric unit of Limoges University hospital (France) over a 49-month period were included, whatever their medical condition. For all the patients, clinical pharmacologists listed the medications given before admission and identified the possible ADRs. The appropriateness of these medications and the causal relationship between drugs (either appropriate or not) and ADRs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two thousand and eighteen patients were included. The number of drugs taken was 7.3 +/- 3.0 in the patients with ADRs and 6.0 +/- 3.0 in those without ADRs (P < 0.0001). Sixty-six percent of the patients were given at least one IM prior to admission. ADR prevalence was 20.4% among the 1331 patients using IMs and 16.4% among those using only appropriate drugs (P < 0.03). In only 79 of the 1331 IM users (5.9%) were ADRs directly attributable to IMs. The IMs most often involved in patients with ADRs were: anticholinergic antidepressants, cerebral vasodilators, long-acting benzodiazepines and concomitant use of two or more psychotropic drugs from the same therapeutic class. Using multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounding factors, IM use was not associated with a significant increased risk of ADRs (odds ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.8, 1.3).

CONCLUSION

Besides a reduction in the number of drugs given to the elderly, a good prescription should involve a reduction in the proportion of IMs and should take into consideration the frailty of these patients.