Anti-D alloimmunization after D-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic diseases

RhD mismatch does not affect haematopoietic recovery, graft-versus-host disease and survival in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A Japanese registry-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ABO blood group mismatch between the donor and the recipient can affect the success of the transplant as well as problems with the red blood cells during allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the impact of the Rhesus (Rh) D mismatch on transplant outcomes in allogeneic HCT has been poorly elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of the RhD mismatch on post-transplant outcomes in 64,923 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2000 and 2021 using a Japanese registry database.

RESULTS

Out of the whole group, 64,293, 322, 270 and 38 HCTs were done when the recipient or donor was RhD-mismatched with (+/+), (-/+), (+/-) or (-/-) combinations. The difference in RhD between recipient/donor (-/+), (+/-) and (-/-) did not affect haematopoietic recovery, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) or relapse when RhD (+/+) was used as the reference group in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our registry-based study demonstrated that RhD mismatch between recipient and donor did not significantly impact haematopoietic recovery, GVHD, OS, NRM or relapse after allogeneic HCT. These data suggest that RhD mismatches may not need to be avoided for recipient and donor combinations in allogeneic HCT.

Anti-D immunization after D positive platelet transfusions in D negative recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-D can be formed after D-incompatible platelet transfusions due to contaminating D+ red blood cells. These antibodies are of particular importance in women of childbearing potential, because anti-D is most often involved in severe cases of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This systematic review determined the frequency of anti-D after D+ platelet transfusions and risk factors for D alloimmunization.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Relevant literature was searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science until December 2022. Overall anti-D frequency and risk factors were estimated using a random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In 22 studies, a total of 3028 D- patients received a mean of six D+ platelet transfusions. After a mean follow-up of seven months 106 of 2808 eligible patients formed anti-D. The pooled anti-D frequency was 3.3% (95% CI 2.0-5.0%; I2 71%). After including only patients with an undoubtable follow-up of at least 4 weeks, 29 of 1497 patients formed anti-D with a pooled primary anti-D rate of 1.9% (95% CI 0.9-3.2%, I2 44%). Women and patients receiving whole blood derived platelets had two and five times higher anti-D rates compared with men and patients receiving apheresis derived platelets, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Anti-D immunization is low after D incompatible platelet transfusions and dependent on recipients' sex and platelet source. We propose anti-D prophylaxis in girls and women, capable of becoming pregnant in the future, that received D+ platelets, regardless of platelet source, to reduce the risk of anti-D induced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Transfusion Support in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Contemporary Narrative Review

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a cornerstone of modern medical practice, and can only be performed safely and effectively with appropriate transfusion medicine support. Patients undergoing HSCT often develop therapy-related cytopenia, necessitating differing blood product requirements in the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant periods. Moreover, ensuring optimal management for patients alloimmunized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and/or red blood cell (RBC) antigens, as well as for patients receiving ABO-incompatible transplants, requires close collaboration with transfusion medicine and blood bank professionals. Finally, as updated transfusion guidelines and novel blood product modifications emerge, the options available to the transplant practitioner continue to expand. Herein, we detail contemporary blood transfusion and transfusion medicine practices for patients undergoing HSCT.

Use of Low-Titer O-Positive Whole Blood in Female Trauma Patients: A Literature Review, Qualitative Multidisciplinary Analysis of Risk/Benefit, and Guidelines for Its Use as a Universal Product in Hemorrhagic Shock

BACKGROUND

Whole blood transfusion is associated with benefits including improved survival, coagulopathy, and decreased transfusion requirements. The majority of whole blood transfusion is in the form of low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB). Practice at many trauma centers withholds the use of LTOWB in women of childbearing potential due to concerns of alloimmunization. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for LTOWB transfusion in female trauma patients and generate guidelines for its application.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature and evidence for LTOWB transfusion in hemorrhagic shock are reviewed. The rates of alloimmunization and subsequent obstetrical outcomes are compared to the reported outcomes of LTOWB vs other resuscitation media. Literature regarding patient experiences and preferences in regards to the risk of alloimmunization is compared to current trauma practices.

RESULTS

LTOWB has shown improved outcomes in both military and civilian settings. The overall risk of alloimmunization for Rhesus factor (Rh) - female patients in hemorrhagic shock exposed to Rh + blood is low (3% to 20%). Fetal outcomes in Rh-sensitized patients are excellent compared to historical standards, and treatment options continue to expand. The majority of female patients surveyed on the risk of alloimmunization favor receiving Rh + blood products to improve trauma outcomes. Obstetrical transfusion practices have incorporated LTOWB with excellent results.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of whole blood resuscitation in trauma is associated with benefits in the resuscitation of severely injured patients. The rate at which severely injured, Rh-negative patients develop anti-D antibodies is low. Treatments for alloimmunized pregnancies have advanced, with excellent results. Fears of alloimmunization in female patients are likely overstated and may not warrant the withholding of whole blood resuscitation. The benefits of whole blood resuscitation likely outweigh the risks of alloimmunization.

Risk of RBC alloimmunization in multiple myeloma patients treated by Daratumumab

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab (DARA) is a human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). DARA binds to CD38 on RBCs and interferes with detection of RBC alloantibodies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of RBC alloimmunization in MM patients treated with DARA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of the complete serological profile and transfusion history of 45 MM patients received transfusion and treated with DARA from July 2015 to December 2018 was undertaken. All cases with positive Ab screens were treated with DTT to identify RBC alloantibodies. RBC transfusion history was monitored between the first DARA dose to the last or extending to the first negative Ab screen after the last DARA dose if the Ab screen was ever positive. Forty-six MM patients received transfusion but not DARA were studied as control group.

RESULTS

Totally 184 Ab screens were done on 45 patients transfused with ABO-Rh compatible RBCs, phenotypically matched units or both. None of them showed detectable alloantibodies after DTT treatment. The duration of Ab screening positivity varied markedly, ranging from 25 days to 5 months after the last dose. Two of 46 patients in the control group had preexisting alloantibodies but no new alloantibodies were detected during study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the risk of forming new RBC alloantibodies after transfusion in MM patients treated with current regimens is very low and no DARA-associated difference in the alloimmunization risk. No significant difference in alloimmunization is detected between ABO-Rh compatible and phenotypically matched transfusion.

Transient hemolysis due to anti-D and anti-A1 produced by engrafted donor's lymphocytes after allogeneic unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Development of de novo alloantibodies against recipient's red blood cell (RBC) antigens by engrafted donor's lymphocytes is a known phenomenon in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This situation is usually clinically insignificant. We report a case of early clinically relevant hemolytic anemia in a blood group A₁ D+ patient, due to a limited production of anti-D and anti-A₁ produced by nonpreviously sensitized newly engrafted donor's immune system.

CASE REPORT

A 31-year-old Caucasian woman, blood group A₁ , D+, with Hodgkin's lymphoma, received an unmanipulated haploidentical allogeneic peripheral blood HSCT after a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Donor blood group was A₂ B, D-. The patient had an uneventful course until Day +34, when she developed clinically significant hemolytic anemia with a positive direct antiglobulin test. Anti-D and anti-A₁ produced by the donor-engrafted lymphocytes were detected both in serum and in eluate. The hemolysis produced an accelerated group change, turning the patient's ABO group into A₂ B 2 weeks after the detection of the alloantibodies. As the residual patient's RBCs progressively disappeared, anti-D and anti-A₁ production decreased and were not detected in serum by Day +41.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates that de novo alloantibody production against ABO and D antigens by the newly engrafted donor's lymphocytes can occasionally cause clinically significant anemia. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported of clinically significant hemolytic anemia due to a transient anti-D anti-A₁ alloimmunization after T-cell-repleted haploidentical HSCT.

Treatments for hematologic malignancies in contrast to those for solid cancers are associated with reduced red cell alloimmunization

Red cell alloimmunization may induce severe hemolytic side effects. Identification of risk-modifying conditions will help tailor preventative strategies. This study aims to quantify the associations of hematologic malignancies and solid cancers with red cell alloimmunization in patients receiving red cell transfusions. We performed a nested multicenter case-control study in a source population of 24,063 patients receiving their first and subsequent red cell transfusions during an 8-year follow-up period. Cases (n=505), defined as patients developing a first transfusion-induced red cell alloantibody, were each compared with 2 non-alloimmunized controls (n=1010) who received a similar number of red cell units. Using multivariate logistic regression analyses, we evaluated the association of various malignancies and treatment regimens with alloimmunization during a delineated 5-week risk period. The incidence of alloimmunization among patients with acute (myeloid or lymphoid) leukemia and mature (B- or T-cell) lymphoma was significantly reduced compared to patients without these malignancies: adjusted relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 (range 0.19-0.68) and 0.30 (range 0.12-0.81). Associations were primarily explained by immunosuppressive treatments [RR for (any type of) chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy 0.27 (95%CI: 0.09-0.83)]. Alloimmunization risks were similarly diminished in allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplanted patients (RR 0.34, 95%CI: 0.16-0.74), at least during the six months post transplant. Alloimmunization risks of patients with other hematologic diseases or solid cancers, and their associated treatment regimens were similar to risks in the general transfused population. Our findings suggest that, in contrast to malignancies in general, hemato-oncological patients treated with dose-intensive regimens have strongly diminished risk of red cell alloimmunization.

ABO-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option for a variety of malignant and non-malignant hematological and congenital diseases. Due to the fact that the human leukocyte antigen system is inherited independently of the blood group system, approximately 40-50% of all HSCTs are performed across the ABO blood group barrier. The expected immune-hematological consequences after transplantation of an ABO-mismatched stem cell graft are immediate and delayed hemolytic complications due to presence of isohemagglutinins or passenger lymphocyte syndrome. The risks of these complications can partially be prevented by graft manipulation and appropriate transfusion support. Dependent on the kind of ABO mismatch, different effects on engraftment have been observed, e.g. delayed red blood cell recovery and pure red cell aplasia. Data on incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality, relapse, and overall survival are inconsistent as most studies include limited patient numbers, various graft sources, and different conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens. This makes it difficult to detect a consistent effect of ABO-mismatched transplantation in the literature. However, knowledge of expectable complications and close monitoring of patients helps to detect problems early and to treat patients efficiently, thus reducing the number of fatal or life-threatening events caused by ABO-mismatched HSCT.

Low frequency of anti-D alloimmunization following D+ platelet transfusion: the Anti-D Alloimmunization after D-incompatible Platelet Transfusions (ADAPT) study

The reported frequency of D alloimmunization in D- recipients after transfusion of D+ platelets varies. This study was designed to determine the frequency of D alloimmunization, previously reported to be an average of 5 ± 2%. A primary anti-D immune response was defined as the detection of anti-D ≥ 28 d following the first D+ platelet transfusion. Data were collected on 485 D- recipients of D+ platelets in 11 centres between 2010 and 2012. Their median age was 60 (range 2-100) years. Diagnoses included: haematological (203/485, 42%), oncological (64/485, 13%) and other diseases (218/485, 45%). Only 7/485 (1·44%; 95% CI 0·58-2·97%) recipients had a primary anti-D response after a median serological follow-up of 77 d (range: 28-2111). There were no statistically significant differences between the primary anti-D formers and the other patients, in terms of gender, age, receipt of immunosuppressive therapy, proportion of patients with haematological/oncological diseases, transfusion of whole blood-derived or apheresis platelets or both, and total number of transfused platelet products. This is the largest study with the longest follow-up of D alloimmunization following D+ platelet transfusion. The low frequency of D alloimmunization should be considered when deciding whether to administer Rh Immune Globulin to D- males and D- females without childbearing potential after transfusion of D+ platelets.

Frequency and prognostic value of D alloantibodies after D-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning

BACKGROUND

Due to the fact that the ABO and D system is inherited independently from the HLA system, approximately 40% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are performed across the blood group barrier. Reports on the development of de novo anti-D in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by D-mismatched allogeneic HSCT are rare. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of anti-D alloimmunization after D-mismatched HSCT following RIC and its prognostic impact on transplant outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty patients with hematologic diseases who underwent D-mismatched HSCT were retrospectively analyzed: 19 D- patients with a D+ donor and 21 D+ patients with a D- donor. Routine serologic testing for blood group typing and antibody screening was performed by a column agglutination method every time when transfusion of red blood cell units was requested and in the posttransplantation course to demonstrate establishment of donor ABO type and to detect alloimmunization.

RESULTS

After a median serologic follow-up of 21 (range, 0 to 73) months after HSCT, anti-D was identified in 2 of 21 (10%) D+ patients receiving a D- transplant, 23 and 34 months after HSCT. None of the 19 D- patients with a D+ donor developed an anti-D.

CONCLUSION

We observed an infrequent de novo anti-D formation that is more likely in D+ recipients of D- grafts. However, the development of anti-D does not normally impair the transplant outcome and is not of clinical relevance in the posttransplant course.

Platelet transfusions from D+ donors to D- patients: a 10-year follow-up study of 1014 patients

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend that platelets (PLTs) from D- donors should be given to D- patients. However, such evidence comes from studies with a limited number of included patients that reported an incidence of anti-D alloimmunization to be up to 19%. We thus decided to extend these findings by examining anti-D alloimmunization at our institution, where PLT transfusions from D+ donors are transfused to D- patients because of logistic constraints.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From April 1999 to December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical and transfusion records of all D- patients who received PLT transfusions from D+ donors at our hospital. PLT concentrates (PCs) were obtained from apheresis and from whole blood donations. RhIG was not administered after the transfusion of PCs from D+ donors. The antibody screen test to detect anti-D was performed by low-ionic-strength solution indirect antiglobulin test using the gel test.

RESULTS

Our series comprises 1014 D- patients who received 5128 PLT transfusions from D+ donors (89% were pooled PCs). We had 315 (31.1%) patients who had a blood sample to analyze the presence of anti-D 4 or more weeks after the first D+ PLT transfusion with a median follow-up of 29 weeks (range, 4-718 weeks). Anti-D developed in 12 (3.8%) of these 315 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of anti-D alloimmunization of D- patients after receiving pooled PCs from D+ donors is low. The transfusion of D-incompatible pooled PCs without immunoprophylaxis to D- men or D- women without childbearing potential seems a reasonable and safe alternative.

Does a febrile reaction to platelets predispose recipients to red blood cell alloimmunization?

BACKGROUND

A variable effect of inflammation on alloimmunization to transfused red blood cells (RBCs) in mice has been recently reported. We investigated whether RBC alloimmunization in humans was affected by transfusion of blood products in temporal proximity to experiencing a febrile transfusion reaction (FTR) to platelets (PLTs), an event predominantly mediated by inflammatory cytokines.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Blood bank databases were used to identify patients who experienced an FTR or possible FTR to PLTs from August 2000 to March 2008 (FTR group). The control group of patients received a PLT transfusion on randomly selected dates without experiencing an FTR. The "event" was defined as the PLT transfusion that caused the FTR in the FTR group or the index PLT transfusion in the control group. The number of transfused blood products and their proximity to the event were recorded along with other recipient data. The primary endpoint was the rate of RBC alloimmunization between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 190 recipients in the FTR group and 245 in the control group. Overall, the recipients in the control group were younger and received more blood products on the day of their event and over the subsequent 10 days. The alloimmunization rate among recipients in the FTR group was higher than in the control group (8% vs. 3%, respectively; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data support our hypothesis that recipient inflammation may affect RBC alloimmunization in humans; however, a more detailed understanding of the pathophysiologic association between inflammation and alloimmunization is required before definitive conclusions can be reached.

A review of transfusion practice before, during, and after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation

The increased use of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation has implications and consequences for transfusion services: not only in hospitals where HPC transplantations are performed, but also in hospitals that do not perform HPC transplantations but manage patients before or after transplantation. Candidates for HPC transplantation have specific and specialized transfusion requirements before, during, and after transplantation that are necessary to avert the adverse consequences of alloimmunization to human leukocyte antigens, immunohematologic consequences of ABO-mismatched transplantations, or immunosuppression. Decisions concerning blood transfusions during any of these times may compromise the outcome of an otherwise successful transplantation. Years after an HPC transplantation, and even during clinical remission, recipients may continue to be immunosuppressed and may have critically important, special transfusion requirements. Without a thorough understanding of these special requirements, provision of compatible blood components may be delayed and often urgent transfusion needs prohibit appropriate consultation with the patient's transplantation specialist. To optimize the relevance of issues and communication between clinical hematologists, transplantation physicians, and transfusion medicine physicians, the data and opinions presented in this review are organized by sequence of patient presentation, namely, before, during, and after transplantation.

Lack of effect of donor-recipient Rh mismatch on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

A recently published study has reported that donor-recipient Rhesus (Rh)-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation independently led to significantly poorer survival. This suggests that donor-recipient Rh mismatching is a risk factor in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and should be a criterion for donor selection.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To further evaluate this issue, 258 consecutive patients who underwent myeloablative or submyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at our institution were analyzed to determine the association between the Rh mismatch pattern and 5-year actuarial survival. Secondary endpoints analyzed were the association of donor-recipient Rh mismatch and event-free survival, transplant-related mortality, incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and incidence of chronic GVHD.

RESULTS

In our analysis, there were no significant associations between donor-recipient Rh mismatch pattern and overall survival, event-free survival, transplant-related mortality, incidence of acute GVHD, or incidence of chronic GVHD. On multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, the donor-recipient Rh mismatch pattern was not independently predictive of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Donor-recipient Rh mismatch is not a risk factor in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and does not affect transplant outcomes.

Detection of anti-D in D- recipients transfused with D+ red blood cells

BACKGROUND

The D antigen is highly immunogenic, requiring only a small quantity of transfused red blood cells (RBCs) to cause alloimmunization in D- immunocompetent recipients. The relatively low sensitization rate in oncology patients transfused with D+ platelets is well documented. A study of the alloimmunization rate of primarily nononcology D- recipients transfused with D+ RBCs was undertaken.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Transfusion service records were examined to identify D- recipients who were not alloimmunized to the D antigen and who had a follow-up antibody screen performed at least 10 days after the initial D+ RBC transfusion(s). The age and sex of the recipients, date and number of D+ RBC transfusion(s) and their leukoreduction status, all subsequent serologic investigations, and the hospital ward where the units were issued were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 98 study-eligible recipients identified who received a total of 445 D+ RBC units. The mean follow-up length was 182 days. Most recipients (87%) had antibody screens performed more than 21 days after the initial D+ RBC transfusion. In total, 24 recipients made 44 new alloantibodies: 22 anti-D (22%), 11 anti-E, 5 anti-C, 2 anti-K, and 1 each of anti-Kp(a), anti-Jk(a), anti-Bg, and anti-Fy(b). The rate of anti-D alloimmunization among recipients of entirely leukoreduced D+ units was 13 percent (1/8). Reexposure to D+ RBCs after the initial bleeding episode did not increase the rate of alloimmunization.

CONCLUSIONS

The 22 percent rate of anti-D alloimmunization in patients requiring urgent RBC transfusion was intermediate between the rates previously reported for D- oncology patients transfused with D+ RBCs and that in immunocompetent volunteer recipients.