The value of DNA analysis for antigens of the Kidd blood group system

Kidd Blood Group Genotyping for Thalassemia Patient in Iran

We aimed to determine the JK genotype in thalassemia patients from Iran using different molecular methods to compare with phenotyping results. We also aimed to standardize for the first time, the Tetra-Primer ARMS PCR method for JK genotyping. The serology method cannot correctly determine the phenotype of blood group antigens in patients with multiple blood transfusions. Peripheral blood samples were taken from two hundred alloimmunized thalassemic patients in Tehran Adult Thalassemic Clinic. The samples were tested phenotypically by routine serological methods. After DNA Extraction, SSP-PCR was performed. DNA sequencing and PCR-RFLP were used to confirm the SSP-PCR results. Discrepancies were found between the phenotype and genotype in 32 out of 200 cases. In 16 cases phenotype was determined as Jk (a + b +) but genotype was JK*A/JK*A, in 14 cases phenotype was Jk (a + b +) while the genotype showed JK*B/JK*B, 1 case had been phenotyped as Jk (a + b -) but it was genotyped as JK*A/JK*B and 1 case had been phenotyped as Jk (a - b +) but it was genotyped as JK*A/JK*B. Serological results for a few samples could not be confirmed because of mix-field agglutination. The genotyping however verified the presence of Kidd alleles. Molecular methods are a valuable tool to predict blood group phenotypes in multi-transfused patients in order to select RBC units for a perfect matching improving blood transfusion and preventing alloimmunization. Also Tetra-Primer ARMS PCR is simple and cost effective methods that could be alternative by conventional Molecular methods.

Frequency of red blood cell genotypes in multi-transfused patients and blood donors from Minas Gerais, Southeast Brazil

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The frequency of red blood cell (RBC) antigens in Brazil varies due to differences in the ethnic groups in different regions; however, these studies have not been performed in Minas Gerais, where African admixture is more prevalent in comparison with other states. Due to these facts, this study aimed to determine the frequency of RBC genotypes on Rh, Kell, Duffy and Kidd systems in blood donors and multi-transfused patients from Minas Gerais, Southeast Brazil.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 170 donors and 117 patients with different diagnosis and at least three RBC transfusions. DNA was extracted from leukocytes and genotyped by PCR-SSP, Multiplex or RFLP to alleles of the referred systems. The results were compared by the Chi-Square test, with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

The most frequent genotypes were: RHD+, RHCE*ce/RHCE*ce, KEL*2/KEL*2, FY*B-67T/FY*B-67T and JK*A/JK*B. FY*B-67C/FY*B-67C, RHD*Ψ and JK*A/JK*A genotypes were more prevalent in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients than in donors. Many differences in RBC genotype frequencies were observed in comparison with studies from other states and countries.

CONCLUSION

The results reinforce the importance of determining RBC genotypes of blood donors and patients in different regions of Brazil and the world, improving the transfusion safety of individuals requiring chronic RBC transfusions, especially those with SCD, due to ethnic differences in relation to donors.

Advances in Blood Typing

The clinical importance of blood group antigens relates to their ability to evoke immune antibodies that are capable of causing hemolysis. The most important antigens for safe transfusion are ABO and D (Rh), and typing for these antigens is routinely performed for patients awaiting transfusion, prenatal patients, and blood donors. Typing for other blood group antigens, typically of the Kell, Duffy, Kidd, and MNS blood groups, is sometimes necessary, for patients who have, or are likely to develop antibodies to these antigens. The most commonly used typing method is serological typing, based on hemagglutination reactions against specific antisera. This method is generally reliable and practical for routine use, but it has certain drawbacks. In recent years, molecular typing has emerged as an alternative or supplemental typing method. It is based on detecting the polymorphisms and mutations that control the expression of blood group antigens, and using this information to predict the probable antigen type. Molecular typing methods are useful when traditional serological typing methods cannot be used, as when a patient has been transfused and the sample is contaminated with red blood cells from the transfused blood component. Moreover, molecular typing methods can precisely identify clinically significant variant antigens that cannot be distinguished by serological typing; this capability has been exploited for the resolution of typing discrepancies and shows promise for the improved transfusion management of patients with sickle cell anemia. Despite its advantages, molecular typing has certain limitations, and it should be used in conjunction with serological methods.

Duffy and kidd genotyping facilitates pretransfusion testing in patients undergoing long-term transfusion therapy

Objective: Conventional serologic typing of red blood cell systems other than ABO and RhD can be inaccurate and difficult to interpret in patients who have recently undergone blood transfusion. While molecular-based assays are not used routinely, the usefulness of genotyping was investigated in order to determine patients who may benefit from this procedure.

Materials and Methods: Blood samples were taken from 101 patients with haemato-oncological, chronic renal, or gastroenterological diseases and from 50 donor controls; the samples were tested for Fya and Fyb by applying serologic and genetic methods. All patients had received 3 or more units of RBCs during the last 3 months. An average of 6.1 RBC units were transfused per patient. The average length of time from transfusion until blood sampling was 24.4 days. The haemagglutination test was applied for serological analysis, and the restriction length polymorphism assay was used for genotyping.

Results: In total, 33 (32.7%) patients showed positive reactions with anti-Fya or anti-Fyb while being negative genetically. False-positive Fya results were found in 23 samples, and false-positive Fyb in 10 specimens. During the last 3 months, significantly more RBC units were transfused to patients with discrepant results than to those with accurate phenotyping/genotyping results: median of 5 (mean ± SE: 6.85±0.69) versus median of 4 (mean: 5.71±0.51), respectively (p=0.025). The median length of time after the last transfusion was 25 days (mean: 28.72±2.23 days) in the group with accurate phenotyping/genotyping results versus a median of 14 days (mean: 15.52±1.95 days) in the group with discrepant results (p=0.001). Phenotypes and genotypes coincided in all donor samples.

Conclusion: Genotyping assays for the Duffy system should be considered if the patient underwent blood transfusion less than 3 or 4 weeks before the sample collection. If the time frame from RBC transfusion exceeds 6 weeks, Duffy phenotyping can provide accurate results.

Clinical aspects of urea transporters

Jk antigens, which were identified as urea transporter B (UT-B) in the plasma membrane of erythrocytes, and which determine the Kidd blood type in humans, are involved in transfusion medicine, and even in organ transplantation. The Jk(a-b-) blood type is a consequence of a silent Slc14A1 gene caused by various mutations related to lineage. In addition, the specific mutations related to hypertension and metabolic syndrome cannot be ignored. Genome-wide association studies established Slc14A1 as a related gene of bladder cancer and some genotypes are associated with higher morbidity. This chapter aims to introduce the clinical significance of urea transporters.

Improved allele-specific PCR technique for Kidd blood group genotyping

BACKGROUND

We developed an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) technique for Kidd blood group genotyping.

METHODS

Altogether, 340 blood samples from Thai blood donors at the National Blood Centre, Thai Red Cross Society, were tested with anti-Jk(a) and anti-Jk(b) using the gel technique and the direct urea lysis test was used for screening Jk(a-b-) phenotype. For AS-PCR technique, different types of primers were used for JK*01 and JK*02 allele detections in known DNA controls.

RESULTS

Regarding JK*02 allele detection, the pseudopositve amplification products were found when using correctly matched forward primer and a single mismatch forward primer. Interestingly, one type of two mismatch pairing at the 3' end of the forward primer can be used together with the newly designed reverse primer for Kidd blood group genotyping. It was found that the typing results in all samples obtained by serological techniques and newly developed AS-PCR technique were in agreement and this PCR technique also gave 100% concordance of results in 30 samples randomly tested twice and demonstrated reproducible results.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the in-house AS-PCR is simple, cost-effective, and convenient for Kidd blood group genotyping in routine laboratories, especially, in resolving serologic investigations.

High-resolution melting analysis for genotyping Duffy, Kidd and Diego blood group antigens

High-resolution melting (HRM) analysis is a simpler genotyping method than allele-specific PCR, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and multiplex PCR. Duffy, Kidd and Diego are clinically important blood group antigens. We used a novel method to genotype these three blood group antigens. Purified genomic DNA extracts of blood samples (354 Duffy, 347 Kidd and 457 Diego) were amplified using specific amplification primers. HRM curves were obtained by HRM analysis. Results were in complete concordance with those obtained for previous phenotypes and genotypes. Nucleotide substitutions for these blood group antigens were differentiated by the HRM curves. HRM analysis is a simple genotyping method and is an alternative to serological typing. Our results suggest that HRM analysis can also be used for genotyping blood group antigens whose allotype specificity is determined by single nucleotide substitutions.

Red cell genotyping and the future of pretransfusion testing

Over the past 20 years the molecular bases of almost all the major blood group antigens have been determined. This research has enabled development of DNA-based methods for determining blood group genotype. The most notable application of these DNA-based methods has been for determining fetal blood group in pregnancies when the fetus is at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. The replacement of all conventional serologic methods for pretransfusion testing by molecular methods is not straightforward. For the majority of transfusion recipients matching beyond ABO and D type is unnecessary, and the minority of untransfused patients at risk of alloimmunization who would benefit from more extensively blood group–matched blood cannot be identified reliably. Even if a method to identify persons most likely to make alloantibodies were available, this would not of itself guarantee the provision of extensively phenotype-matched blood for these patients because this is determined by the size and racial composition of blood donations available for transfusion. However, routine use of DNA-based extended phenotyping to provide optimally matched donations for patients with preexisting antibodies or patients with a known predisposition to alloimmunization, such as those with sickle cell disease, is widely used.

Transfusion in the age of molecular diagnostics

DNA-based tests are increasingly being used to predict a blood group phenotype to improve transfusion medicine. This is possible because genes encoding 29 of the 30 blood group systems have been cloned and sequenced, and the molecular bases associated with most antigens have been determined. RBCs carrying a particular antigen, if introduced into the circulation of an individual who lacks that antigen (through transfusion or pregnancy), can elicit an immune response. It is the antibody from such an immune response that causes problems in clinical practice and the reason why antigen-negative blood is required for safe transfusion. The classical method of testing for blood group antigens and antibodies is hemagglutination; however, it has certain limitations, some of which can be overcome by testing DNA. Such testing allows conservation of antibodies for confirmation by hemagglutination of predicted antigen-negativity. High-throughput platforms provide a means to test relatively large numbers of donors, thereby opening the door to change the way antigen-negative blood is provided to patients and to prevent immunization. This review summarizes how molecular approaches, in conjunction with conventional hemagglutination, can be applied in transfusion medicine.

Applications and Experience with PCR-Based Assays to Predict Blood Group Antigens

DNA-based tests are increasingly being used to predict a blood group phenotype. This is possible because genes encoding 29 of the 30 blood group systems have been cloned and sequenced, and the molecular bases associated with most antigens have been determined. RBCs carrying a particular antigen, if introduced into the circulation of an individual who lacks that antigen, can elicit an immune response. It is the antibody from such an immune response that causes problems in clinical practice and the reason why antigen-negative blood is required for safe transfusion. The classical method of testing for blood group antigens and antibodies is hemagglutination; however, it has certain limitations, some of which can be overcome by testing DNA. Such testing allows conservation of antibodies for confirmation by hemagglutination of predicted antigen-negativity. High-throughput platforms provide a means to test relatively large numbers of donors, thereby opening the door to change the way antigen-negative blood is provided to patients. This chapter discusses how molecular approaches can be applied in transfusion medicine, and summarizes experiences of using laboratory developed tests and DNA arrays at the New York Blood Center.