Best practice for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and collection in adults and children: results of a Società Italiana Di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare (SIDEM) and Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) consensus process

Does immunohistochemical staining predict mobilization success in multiple myeloma patients?

BACKGROUND

So many risk factors for mobilization failure have been described so far. We aimed to identify the risk factors and search the possible effects of bone marrow fibrosis (BMF), CD56, c-myc, and cyclinD1 expression on mobilization.

METHODS

We evaluated 189 patients with MM who were admitted for stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between 2015 and June 2021. Clinical, laboratory, treatment features, and survival outcomes were compared in patients who were successfully mobilized and who were not.

RESULTS

Mobilization failure rate was 11.1 % (21) in our study group. Male gender, mobilization with only G-CSF, history of previous ASCT, lenalidomide exposure, and 2 lines of chemotherapy before stem cell mobilization were observed more commonly in mobilization failure group. There is no relationship between mobilization failure and BMF, CD56, c-myc, and cyclin D1 expression status in patients who received either only G-CSF or G-CSF+ chemotherapy for mobilization. Overall survival (OS) was not different in groups of patients who were successfully mobilized and who were not. Neutrophil engraftment was faster in patients who were transfused > 5 × 106/kg stem cells (p = 0.015). ECOG performance status (p = 0.004), c-myc expression (p = 0.005), lenalidomide therapy before mobilization (p = 0.032), and mobilization with G-CSF+chemotherapy was found to be predictive factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

Even though we could not find any predictive value of CD56, c-myc, and cyclin D1 expression on mobilization, c-myc was found to be associated with low OS. Further studies with large and homogenous study population would be more informative.

Stem Cells Collection and Mobilization in Adult Autologous/Allogeneic Transplantation: Critical Points and Future Challenges

Achieving successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies on two fundamental pillars: effective mobilization and efficient collection through apheresis to attain the optimal graft dose. These cornerstones pave the way for enhanced patient outcomes. The primary challenges encountered by the clinical unit and collection facility within a transplant program encompass augmenting mobilization efficiency to optimize the harvest of target cell populations, implementing robust monitoring and predictive strategies for mobilization, streamlining the apheresis procedure to minimize collection duration while ensuring adequate yield, prioritizing patient comfort by reducing the overall collection time, guaranteeing the quality and purity of stem cell products to optimize graft function and transplant success, and facilitating seamless coordination between diverse entities involved in the HSCT process. In this review, we aim to address key questions and provide insights into the critical aspects of mobilizing and collecting hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation purposes.

The effect of cryopreservation on engraftment kinetics in fully matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Real-life data and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The standard approach for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is to administer donor cells on the same day as a fresh product to a patient who has been given a preparative regimen. The difficulty in collecting and transporting donor cells, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, has made it essential to collect and cryopreserve the grafts before the recipient begins the transplant preparation regimen. However, the short- and long-term impacts of cryopreservation on transplant outcomes remain controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 93 patients who underwent allo-SCT between January 2012 and August 2022 at the Stem Cell Transplant Unit of Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine using frozen and fresh products of peripheral blood stem cells from a fully matched sibling donor. The effect of cryopreservation of donor grafts on engraftment kinetics was investigated.

RESULTS

Frozen and fresh products were used in 37 and 56 patients, respectively. The majority of patients had acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The median age at transplantation was 41 years. Neutrophil engraftment time was similar between the two groups (median: 14 vs. 16 days, p = 0.393). Platelet engraftment time was longer in the frozen product group (median: 12 vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between freezing time and viability. The acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rate was 37.8 % in the frozen product group and 28.6 % in the fresh product group (p = 0.349). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of primary and secondary graft failure, chronic GVHD, 30-day chimerism, relapse, overall survival, progression-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality.

CONCLUSION

Having donor cells ready before transplantation significantly prevents donor-induced adverse events and provides confidence and practicality to both the clinician and the recipient. Allo-SCT with frozen products is a successful method that can be safely applied, especially when disruptions in donor-derived cell collection or transportation are foreseen.

Predicting Successful Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Healthy Allogeneic Donors

Introduction

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from healthy donors is a well-established process. We aimed to identify factors predictive of successful CD34+ PBSC collection and established a formula capable of predicting CD34+ cell yield.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 588 healthy adult donors (median age 29 years, range 18-69 years) at our institution from 2017 to 2022. The predicted minimal number of CD34+ cells was calculated as follows: (peripheral CD34+ cells/µL × adjusted collection efficiency of 30%) × total liters processed. This formula was further modified according to donor and recipient body weight (BW).

Results

Median total collection was 8.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW (range 1.0-47.1 × 106 cells/kg BW) with 522 donors (89%) collecting ≥5.0 × 106 cells/kg of recipient BW. A second leukapheresis (LP) was performed in 49 donors. Need for two LPs was more common in female donors (OR 6.68, 95% CI, 2.62-17.05; p < 0.001), donors with higher age (OR for 10 years difference 1.53, 95% CI, 1.15-2.03, p = 0.003), donors with WBC count <30 × 109/L after 5 days of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulation (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.59-11.83; p = 0.004), and a donor/recipient weight ratio <1 (OR 6.21, 95% CI, 2.69-14.34; p < 0.001). Predictive factors for optimal LP (i.e., ≥5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg of recipient BW) were peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell count >50/µL (OR 12.82, range 6.34-25.92, p < 0.001), male donor (OR 2.77, range 1.06-7.23, p = 0.04), and a donor/recipient weight ratio >1 (OR 3.12, range 1.57-6.24, p = 0.001). WBC, platelets, hemoglobin, and age had no significant predictive value. Predicted versus observed number of CD34+ cells/kg BW collected demonstrated a very strong linear correlation (r = 0.925, 95% CI, 0.912-0.936, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Of the routinely monitored indicators in PBSC donors, CD34+ cell count in PB is the most important factor in predicting G-CSF-induced PBSC yields. Higher age, female sex, WBC <30 × 109/L, and a donor/recipient weight ratio <1 are useful indicators for identifying suboptimal mobilizers. The modified formula has shown successful and consistent performance in the prediction of key outcome measures including the minimum CD34+ cell collection, determination of the required length of apheresis, and whether a second day of PBSC collection was necessary to achieve the respective collection goal.

Peripheral Blood Allogeneic Stem Cell Mobilization: Can We Predict a Suboptimal Mobilization?

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells mobilization is now the basis of most stem cell transplants. In a very limited number of cases, mobilization is suboptimal leading to further collection procedures, to suboptimal cell doses infusion with delayed engraftment time, increased risks of transplant procedure and of related costs. To date we have no recognized and shared criteria for early estimating the probability of poor mobilization in healthy donors. We then analyzed allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donations performed at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS Hospital from January 2013 to December 2021 in order to identify premobilization factors associated with successful mobilization. The following data were collected: age, gender, weight, complete blood cell count at baseline, G-CSF dose, number of collection procedures, CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood on the first day of collection, CD34+ cell dose per kg body weight of recipient. Mobilization efficacy was defined according to the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood on day +5 of G-CSF administration. We classified donors as sub-optimal mobilizers or good mobilizers according to the achievement of the 50 CD34+ cell/μL threshold. We observed 30 suboptimal mobilizations in 158 allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donations. Age and baseline white blood cell count were factors significantly associated with negative or positive impact on mobilization, respectively. We did not find significant differences in mobilization based on gender or G-CSF dose. Using cut-off values of 43 years and 5.5×10⁹/L WBC count, we built a suboptimal mobilization score: donors who reach 2, 1 or 0 points have a 46%, 16% or 4% probability of suboptimal mobilization, respectively. Our model explains 26% of the variability of mobilization confirming that most of the mobilization magnitude depends on genetically determined factors; however, suboptimal mobilization score is a simple tool providing an early assessment of mobilization efficacy before G-CSF administration begins in order to support allogeneic stem cells selection, mobilization and collection. Through a systematic review, we looked for confirmation of our findings. According to the published articles, all the variables we included in our model are confirmed to be strongly related to the success of mobilization. We believe that score system approach could be applied in clinical practice to assess the risk of mobilization failure at baseline allowing for a priori intervention.

Economic evaluation of plerixafor addition in the mobilization and leukapheresis of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Although plerixafor in association with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can improve mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) by leukapheresis, cost may limit its clinical application. The present study systematically reviews economic evaluations of plerixafor plus G-CSF usage compared to G-CSF alone and compares different strategies of plerixafor utilization in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients eligible for autologous HSC transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant economic evaluations, partial or complete, were searched on PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for a period ending 30 June 2021. This systematic review was reported following the PRISMA Statement. Six economic evaluations were included, considering the use of upfront or just-in-time plerixafor compared to G-CSF alone or other plerixafor strategies. Most comparisons showed both increased cost and health benefits with the addition of plerixafor. Most analyses favored just-in-time plerixafor compared to upfront plerixafor, with a probable preference for broader cutoffs for just-in-time plerixafor initiation.

EXPERT OPINION

Plerixafor is a potentially cost-effective technology in the mobilization of HSC in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphomas eligible for autologous HSC transplantation. There is a decreased number of leukapheresis sessions and remobilizations and a higher yield of CD34+ cells.

Outcomes of stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma according to CD56 expression status

BACKGROUND

The molecular mechanism underlying the mobilization and engraftment of CD34+ cells is poorly understood. The most relevant factors in the regulation of stem cell release and engraftment include chemokines, adhesion molecules, and chemokine receptors. Previously, it was suggested that the absence of CD56 expression could be used as a predictive factor for mobilization failure at the time of diagnosis. Here, we investigated the effect of CD56 expression status on both mobilization and engraftment processes. Additionally, other factors affecting mobilization and engraftment efficacy were investigated.

METHODS

Data from 79 multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed for peripheral stem cell mobilization and posttransplant neutrophil and platelet engraftment according to CD56 expression on myeloma cells.

RESULTS

No difference in either the median number of CD34+ cells collected or time to engraftment was found between the CD56+ and CD56- groups. The age of the patients (p = 0.025) and peak number of circulating CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (p = 0.005) were important predictors for a higher number of collected CD34+ cells. The average time to recovery of leukocytes and platelets after transplantation was markedly correlated with the number of transplanted stem cells and peak number of circulating CD34+ cells in peripheral blood, respectively (p = 0.049 and p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated no effect of CD56 expression status on the mobilization and engraftment of PBSCs. Our results also support the notion that the peak number of circulating CD34+ cells in peripheral blood is clinically important for rapid platelet engraftment following HPC transplantation.

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor in children

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We report here our experience of using pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor (peg-GCSF) for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in children.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of nine children suffering from high-risk/relapsed solid tumors were mobilized with chemotherapy and peg-GCSF (100 microgram/kg single dose). Mean age was 7.7 years (range 2-15 years).The mean time from peg-GCSF administration to PBSC harvest was 9.7 days. Adequate stem cells (median dose 26.9 million/kg) could be harvested in all children by a single apheresis procedure. No major adverse events observed.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible and safe to mobilize PBSC with peg-GCSF in children with cancer.

[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of plerixafor combined with G-CSF in plasma cell disease mobilization]

Objective: To analyze the effect and safety of plerixafor combined with G-CSF mobilization in plasma cell disease. Methods: The clinical baseline data, success rate of collection, and adverse reactions of consecutive cases of plasma cell disease were analyzed retrospectively, where the patients received plerixafor combined with G-CSF for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Results: Forty-nine patients with plasma disease were included, of which 39 (79.6% ) were multiple myeloma, 8 (16.3% ) were amyloidosis, and 2 (4.1% ) were monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. A total of 16 patients (32.7% ) had renal insufficiency, and 7 patients (14.3% ) had previous collection failure. The median times of apheresis was 1 (1-3) , median days of apheresis was 2 (1-3) days, 47 patients (95.9% ) were successfully collected for once, and the success rate of collection for twice was 100% after using plerixafor for mobilization. In 16 patients with renal insufficiency, collection was successful in 5 patients (31.3% ) on the first day, while aphresis was required in 8 patients (50% ) on the second day and 3 (18.8% ) on the third day. The main adverse reactions were fatigue, insomnia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dizziness, and arthralgia. A total of 37 patients underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with 11 (8-13) days for neutrophil engraftment, and 11 (9-26) days for platelet engraftment. Conclusions: Plerixafor combined with G-CSF has a high success rate in mobilizaion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells in patients with plasma cell disease with minimum side effects, even in patients with renal insufficiency.

Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

There are several regimens used in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in multiple myeloma (MM). Cyclophosphamide (Cy) is one of the most commonly used agents, although it does not always result in collecting adequate number of CD34+ cells. Recently, cytarabine (Ara-C) has been proposed as potentially efficient and safe option.

AIMS

Since the data regarding Ara-C in HSC mobilization is limited, the aim of our study was to compare retrospectively the efficiency and toxicity of G-CSF combined with either Ara-C or Cy in MM patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Of a total of 89 patients, 43 received low or intermediate doses of Cy, and 46 were treated with 800 mg/m² /day of Ara-C administered for two days.

RESULTS

The mean peak of CD34+ cells/ul in peripheral blood was 132 (range, 84-202) in Ara-C and 51 (range, 29-69) in Cy cohort (p < 0.001). The median number of collected CD34+ cells (×106/kg) was 10.3 (range, 4.2-17.9) vs 4.5 (range, 2.7-8.9), respectively (p < 0.001). Mobilization failure was observed in one patient in Ara-C cohort (2%) and in 8 patients treated with Cy (19%) (p = 0.013). In the Ara-C group 98% of patients obtained more than 4×106 CD34+ cells/kg required for tandem transplantation. Moreover, we observed a trend toward increased paraprotein levels measured at transplant compared to before HSC mobilization in Ara-C cohort and significantly higher transfusion rates in that group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm higher HSC mobilization efficacy of Ara-C compared to Cy in MM patients. However, lower transfusions rate and better disease control of Cy may justify its use in some cases.

Validation of a formula predictive of peripheral blood stem cell yield and successful collection in healthy allogeneic donors

BACKGROUND

An efficient mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are crucial to optimize engraftment in the recipient. We aim to validate a formula that predicted CD34⁺ cell yield and to describe variables that correlated with high yield mobilization and collection in healthy donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from healthy donors who underwent PBSC collection from 2006 to 2015. The predicted number of collected cells was calculated using the following formula: Total number of CD34⁺ (cells×10⁶/kg) yield=[(peripheral CD34⁺ cells/μL)×(0.43)/recipient body weight (kg)]×total liters processed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 338 collections from 307 allogeneic PBSC donors. The predicted versus the observed number of CD34⁺ cells/kg collected yielded an r-value of 0.775 (0.726-0.816; p<0.0001). Overall, 55.7% donors had an acceptable mobilization level. Donors with a body weight <67kg were less likely to yield a satisfactory CD34⁺ cell count (OR=0.44; 95% CI 0.24-0.81), while a white blood cell (WBC) count >40×10⁹/L (OR=3.69; 2.11-6.46) and platelet count ≥200×10⁹/L (OR=2.09; 1.26-3.47) on the day of collection predicted a good level of mobilization. Predictors of a CD34⁺ cell yield/kg of ≥4×10⁶ with only one apheresis session were: circulating CD34⁺ cells/μL >40 (OR=16; 6.94-36.93), hemoglobin ≥14g/dL (OR=3.40; 1.53-7.57), WBC >40×10⁹/L (OR=4.61; 2.10-10.10) on the first collection day, and a positive delta weight between donor and recipient (OR=3.10; 1.36-7.06).

CONCLUSION

The formula for predicting CD34⁺ cell yield is accurate and suggests the optimal length of time for successful leukapheresis. Validation of the predictors of successful mobilization will help to further refine PBSC leukapheresis procedures.

Challenge to Predict Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells on the Fourth Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment in Healthy Donors: Predictive Value of Basal CD34+ Cell and Platelet Counts

A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on healthy donors was designed to identify predictors of CD34⁺ cell mobilization on day 4 after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume, WBC count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cell count, platelet (Plt) count, and hematocrit and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34⁺ cell counts were determined for each donor: baseline (before G-CSF administration) and in PB on day 4 after G-CSF administration. One hundred twenty-two consecutive healthy donors with a median age of 47.5 years were enrolled. The median value of CD34⁺ on day 4 was 43 cells/µL (interquartile range, 23 to 68), and 81.1% of donors had ≥20 cells/µL. Basal WBC count, Plt count, and CD34⁺ were significantly higher for the subjects with CD34⁺ levels over median values on day 4. A multivariate quartile regression analysis, adjusted by sex, age, basal CD34⁺, and basal Plt count, showed a progressively stronger relationship between baseline CD34⁺ and Plt levels and the CD34⁺ levels on day 4. The basal CD34⁺ cut-off level to predict the levels of CD34⁺ on day 4 was either ≤2 cells/μL or ≥3 cells/μL and that of basal Plt count was ≤229 × 10⁹/L or ≥230 × 10⁹/L, respectively, to determine whether mobilization therapy should or should not be attempted. PB stem cell mobilization with G-CSF was highly effective on day 4, and herein we describe a model for predicting the probability of performing PB stem cell collection after a short course of G-CSF.

A proposal for sectorial organizing and quality standards in therapeutic apheresis: The therapeutic apheresis unit (TAU) standards

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) includes a wide range of therapeutic procedures based on the separation of blood components and the collection of cells with therapeutic activity or the removal of unwanted plasma or cellular components involved in the etiology of various hematologic, renal, neurological, and medical diseases. The complexity of these interventions requires an organizing model to assure a proper clinical environment, technology, quality requirements, and personnel as well as an active system for outcome monitoring for safety and efficacy. Finally, a structured organizing model may favor the efficiency of the TA unit and economic affordability. Here, we describe the more relevant characteristics of a model of TA standards, named TA unit (TAU) standards, that may help to establish a quality program in units working in the field of TA (shown as supplementary material and available at http://www.ifeit.org/pdf/TAU_Standards_3.0.pdf.

Collection of hematopoietic stem cells and immune effector cells in small children

Apheresis procedures are standard of care for a wide range of indications in children, collection of hematopoietic stem cells being the most frequent one. With increasing numbers of hematopoietic stem cell transplants, advances in graft manipulation techniques and the development of innovative therapies using immune effector cells and gene therapy, apheresis within the pediatric population is growing in demand. While young children have higher circulating white blood cell counts and robustly mobilize hematopoietic stem cells, apheresis machines were designed for use within the adult population and apheresis procedures in children, particularly small children, can be more challenging as vascular access, collection techniques and impact of extracorporeal volumes increase the rate of adverse events. In this article we review topics of particular relevance to hematopoietic stem cell and immune effector cell collections in small children.

Significant correlation between peripheral blood CD34+ cell count in children prior to aphaeresis and CD34+ cell yield following aphaeresis: A single-center experience

Numerous adults' studies demonstrated that preaphaeresis CD34+ cells significantly correlate with the number of CD34+ cells collected by the aphaeresis procedure. Equivalent studies in children are scarce. We studied retrospectively 92 aphaeresis procedures performed following chemotherapy (44) or in steady state (48) in 60 pediatric patients (40 males, 20 females), median age of 7.5 years. Aphaeresis procedures were performed using a SPECTRA Optica (TERUMOBCT) continuous flow cell separator. CD34+ cell concentrations were assessed using flow cytometry. A highly significant correlation between peripheral CD34 cell count on the day of aphaeresis and CD34 cell yield per kg (R²  = .824, P < .0001) was demonstrated. A higher preaphaeresis CD34 cell count was demonstrated in patients with higher preaphaeresis white blood cell count, in patients with brain tumors, and in patients who received chemotherapy as part of their mobilization protocol. A threshold number of 20 peripheral CD34+ cell/μL was found to predict harvesting of 3 × 10⁶ stem cells/kg, and 30 peripheral CD34+ cell/μL for harvesting of 5 × 10⁶ stem cells/kg. This significant correlation between peripheral CD34 cell count and CD34 cell yield, and the threshold number of peripheral CD34 found to predict adequate harvesting can be useful in planning the optimal time for aphaeresis in children.

Lenograstim 5 µg/kg is not superior to biosimilar filgrastim 10 µg/kg in lymphoma patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization after chemotherapy: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials comparing chemomobilization efficiency between lenograstim and biosimilar filgrastim are lacking. Our previous retrospective study suggested that lenograstim could be more effective than biosimilar filgrastim when used at the same conventional dosage (5 µg/kg) only in lymphoma patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. We planned a prospective randomized study comparing lenograstim 5 µg/kg with biosimilar filgrastim 10 µg/kg to verify the hypothesis of lenograstim superiority even at half the dosage (stress test). Herein we report data after enrolling 60% of planned patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From October 2014 to November 2017, a total of 42 of 70 planned patients with lymphoma were randomly assigned to receive lenograstim 5 µg/kg (21) or biosimilar filgrastim 10 µg/kg (21). Patients were stratified according to treatment line at the time of mobilization (1 or ≥2). Primary endpoint was the rate of achievement of the CD34+ cell collection target dose (≥ 4 × 10⁶ /kg). An improvement by 23% was expected to validate the hypothesis of lenograstim superiority.

RESULTS

The two cohorts were balanced for all the baseline features. We observed an identical rate of patients able to reach the targeted CD34+ cell dose and of mobilization failures (90.4 and 4.8% in both cohorts) and a perfect equivalence in any of the secondary collection outcomes. The hypothesis of lenograstim superiority was not corroborated at interim analysis.

CONCLUSION

Lenograstim at conventional dosage has failed to demonstrate its superiority over biosimilar filgrastim at double the dosage at interim analysis in their first head-to-head trial.

Predicting failure of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before it starts: the predicted poor mobilizer (pPM) score

Predicting mobilization failure before it starts may enable patient-tailored strategies. Although consensus criteria for predicted PM (pPM) are available, their predictive performance has never been measured on real data. We retrospectively collected and analyzed 1318 mobilization procedures performed for MM and lymphoma patients in the plerixafor era. In our sample, 180/1318 (13.7%) were PM. The score resulting from published pPM criteria had sufficient performance for predicting PM, as measured by AUC (0.67, 95%CI: 0.63-0.72). We developed a new prediction model from multivariate analysis whose score (pPM-score) resulted in better AUC (0.80, 95%CI: 0.76-0.84, p < 0001). pPM-score included as risk factors: increasing age, diagnosis of NHL, positive bone marrow biopsy or cytopenias before mobilization, previous mobilization failure, priming strategy with G-CSF alone, or without upfront plerixafor. A simplified version of pPM-score was categorized using a cut-off to maximize positive likelihood ratio (15.7, 95%CI: 9.9-24.8); specificity was 98% (95%CI: 97-98.7%), sensitivity 31.7% (95%CI: 24.9-39%); positive predictive value in our sample was 71.3% (95%CI: 60-80.8%). Simplified pPM-score can "rule in" patients at very high risk for PM before starting mobilization, allowing changes in clinical management, such as choice of alternative priming strategies, to avoid highly likely mobilization failure.

Risk factors for poor mobilization in solid tumors: How effectively can we mobilize patients with solid tumors?

BACKGROUND

In the literature, risk factors for poor mobilization were tried to identify. However, most of the studies consisted heterogeneous group of patients including both hematologic and oncologic malignancies. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor mobilization in adults with solid tumors.

METHODS

We enrolled 49(47 men, 2 women) adult patients with solid tumor who were mobilized between September 2007 and February 2017. All the mobilization procedures were performed with G-CSF(10μg/kg/day) with chemotherapy. Mobilization insufficiency was defined as peripheral blood CD34+stem cell number less than 10/μl and/or total collected CD34+cells less than 2.5×10 ⁶/kg.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into two groups, patients with successful mobilization at the first attempt(group 1, 36 patients,73.5%) and poor mobilizers (group 2, 13 patients 26.5%). Second and third mobilization attempt was needed in 11 and 2 patients, respectively. The median number of CD34+cells collected was 7,08×10⁶/kg(0,6-19) with a median 4(1-6) apheresis. There was no statistical difference between two groups in terms of patient's and mobilization characteristics. Only number of CD 34+stem cells collected was statistically different (median 9,07×10⁶/kg CD34+cells in group 1 versus 2,14×10⁶/kg in group 2, p<0.05). The only possible risk factor that we could define was presence of organ metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Since several methods and new drugs are available for peripheral stem cell collecting, risk factors should be identified clearly in adult population with solid tumors. So multicenter studies should be constructed for resolving this problem.

The European Hematology Association Roadmap for European Hematology Research: a consensus document

The European Hematology Association (EHA) Roadmap for European Hematology Research highlights major achievements in diagnosis and treatment of blood disorders and identifies the greatest unmet clinical and scientific needs in those areas to enable better funded, more focused European hematology research. Initiated by the EHA, around 300 experts contributed to the consensus document, which will help European policy makers, research funders, research organizations, researchers, and patient groups make better informed decisions on hematology research. It also aims to raise public awareness of the burden of blood disorders on European society, which purely in economic terms is estimated at €23 billion per year, a level of cost that is not matched in current European hematology research funding. In recent decades, hematology research has improved our fundamental understanding of the biology of blood disorders, and has improved diagnostics and treatments, sometimes in revolutionary ways. This progress highlights the potential of focused basic research programs such as this EHA Roadmap.The EHA Roadmap identifies nine 'sections' in hematology: normal hematopoiesis, malignant lymphoid and myeloid diseases, anemias and related diseases, platelet disorders, blood coagulation and hemostatic disorders, transfusion medicine, infections in hematology, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These sections span 60 smaller groups of diseases or disorders.The EHA Roadmap identifies priorities and needs across the field of hematology, including those to develop targeted therapies based on genomic profiling and chemical biology, to eradicate minimal residual malignant disease, and to develop cellular immunotherapies, combination treatments, gene therapies, hematopoietic stem cell treatments, and treatments that are better tolerated by elderly patients.

Efficacy of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus originator granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in de novo multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

Filgrastim and lenograstim are the standard granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) agents for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization (PBSC) in patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

To assess whether biosimilars are effective, we conducted a single-center, prospective study that included 40 consecutive de novo multiple myeloma patients who received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) per day plus biosimilar filgrastim G-CSF to mobilize PBSC. These patients were compared with a group of 37 patients matched for age, diagnosis, previous chemotherapy and mobilization who had been treated with originator G-CSF. The mean number of CD34+ cells/μL in the peripheral blood was 199.6 ± 207.4 in the biosimilar and 192.8 ± 154.7 in the originator group (P = 0.87). The median number of CD34+ cells/kg recipient collected was 11.5 ± 5.8 and 12.3 ± 5.3 in the biosimilar and originator groups, respectively (P = 0.51). The mobilization failure rate was 2.5% and 2.7% in the biosimilar filgrastim and originator filgrastim cohorts (P = NS), respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients in the biosimilar group and 28 patients in the originator group underwent autologous transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences between the biosimilar and originator G-CSF cohorts in terms of hematopoietic recovery parameters and transplant-related toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of biosimilar G-CSF appears to be equivalent to the reference G-CSF.

A policy for the disposal of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells: report from an Italian consensus panel

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) requires collection and cryopreservation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), which in turn may be partially or never reinfused. Thus, HPC storage has become a logistic, ethical, and economic issue. SIDEM, GITMO, and CNT/ISS endorsed a project aimed to define national criteria for HPC disposal aimed to guarantee appropriateness and equity.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel was convened including HPC harvest and manipulation experts from apheresis units, hematologists with clinical expertise in ASCT, a representative of the national health authority, and a bioethicist. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was carried out to select disposal criteria.

RESULTS

The AHP selected two criteria for prompt disposal of freshly collected HPCs: an abnormal freezing procedure causing highly reduced viability or major microbiology contamination. Moreover, AHP selected six major criteria, each one of them allowing for the disposal of stored HPC units: patient death, withdrawal of consent to ASCT, contraindications or loss of indications to ASCT, a damaged label that prevents correct identification of the unit, and time elapsed since harvest longer than 10 years. Three minor criteria were additionally identified that allowed to anticipate disposal only provided that viability levels are below the limit of acceptance: a documented cold chain interruption, loss of bag integrity, and total amount of stored CD34+ cells lower than 1 × 10(6) /kg or lower than 2 × 10(6)/kg in patients with a successfully completed stem cell transplantation program.

CONCLUSIONS

A formal consensus process allowed SIDEM and GITMO to propose a policy for autologous HPC disposal that fulfills clinical, ethical, and economic criteria.

Central venous catheter insertion in peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell sibling donors: the SIdEM (Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation) point of view

Collection of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells (PBSC) is the practice of choice for graft procurement in both autologous and allogeneic setting. The success of this procedure depends on the use of adequate vascular accesses. Well-sized peripheral veins are the first option in autologous and allogeneic donations. In autologous setting, in case of lack of adequate veins, central venous catheters (CVC) may be used for collection. In the allogeneic setting, although available data have shown the safety of the use of CVC, there are still some controversies about the possible insertion of a CVC in donors. A specific policy from competent registries is usually applied in the different countries to regulate the use of CVC in unrelated donors. In siblings, the question is still undefined due both to the lack of shared guidelines and to the specific characteristics of this donation. In fact, in not so rare cases, larger stem cell doses for specific cell manipulations (e.g., T/B cell depletion in the haploidentical setting) are needed. The lack of international rules or standard that forbid the use of a CVC in siblings and published data that document the safety of this procedure, allowed the Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare (SIdEM) national Board to identify a possible, shared, operational approach to address this issue by a case-specific risk-benefit assessment.

Peripheral blood CD34+ cell monitoring after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an algorithm for the pre-emptive use of plerixafor

Plerixafor "on demand" after chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is efficient in peripheral stem cell mobilization, but the timing of administration and criteria for patient selection are under investigation. To devise an algorithm for the "on demand" use of plerixafor at the first mobilization attempt, we analyzed the kinetics of hematopoietic recovery and peripheral blood CD34+ cells in 107 patients treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF. Fifty-one patients with myeloma were treated with cyclophosphamide 3-4 g/m(2) on day 0 followed by G-CSF 10 μg/kg from day + 6, and 56 patients with lymphoma received cyclophosphamide 6-7 g/m(2) followed by G-CSF 5 μg/kg from day + 1. Peripheral blood CD34+ cell monitoring was started on day + 8 in patients with myeloma and day + 10 in patients with lymphoma. The outcome of interest was a collection of ≤ 2 × 10(6) CD34+/kg. By a multivariate logistic regression model, CD34+ cell count < 10/μL at leukocyte recovery (> 1000/μL) or leukocyte count < 1000/μL after day + 12 in myeloma and day + 14 in lymphoma predicted the failure of mobilization by 2.7 and 2.8 times (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02) with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 88%, respectively. Plerixafor "on demand" may be considered in patients with myeloma and lymphoma with delayed hematopoietic recovery and < 10/μL CD34+ cells, as a first-line mobilization strategy.

Second time a charm? Remobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with plerixafor in patients who previously mobilized poorly despite using plerixafor as a salvage agent

BACKGROUND

Plerixafor is a recently introduced agent used to improve peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, some patients still cannot mobilize adequately even with plerixafor.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the PBSC collections of 18 consecutive lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients, who had previously mobilized poorly despite the use of plerixafor and received plerixafor again during remobilization.

RESULTS

During the first mobilization attempt, all 18 recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; two) or G-CSF plus chemotherapy-mobilized patients (16) had poor response to plerixafor, with peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts ranging from 0 to 7.48 × 10(6)/L after the first dose. They collected only 0.15 × 10(6) to 1.63 × 10(6) (median, 0.40 × 10(6)) CD34+ cells/kg after one to four collections. The median average daily yield was 0.24 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Remobilization began 1 to 4 weeks later with G-CSF, plerixafor, and with (three) or without (15) cyclophosphamide. The PB CD34+ cell counts after the first dose of plerixafor were 3.04 × 10(6) to 127.54 × 10(6)/L (median, 14.58 × 10(6)/L). After one to four doses of plerixafor, each patient collected an additional 0.39 × 10(6) to 14.02 × 10(6) (median, 1.89 × 10(6)) CD34+ cells/kg, and the median daily average was 0.78 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Cumulatively, after two rounds of collections, 15 collected more than 2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Thirteen have proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and successfully engrafted.

CONCLUSION

In patients who had responded poorly to the use of plerixafor as a mobilization salvage agent, response to remobilization with plerixafor for the second time was variable, but most (83.3%) patients were able to collect enough PBSCs to proceed to ASCT.

A multiple regression analysis on factors influencing haematopoietic progenitor cell collection for autologous transplantation

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation today is the standard treatment for a wide variety of haematological and oncological diseases. HSC are collected from peripheral blood by leukapheresis (HPC-A) following chemotherapy and/or growth factor-mediated mobilization. The ideal HPC-A collection allows to reach the CD34(+) target dose through a single, tailored leukapheresis. The aim of this paper was to find out which collection parameter might play a key role in obtaining a CD34 dose >4×10(6)/kg with a reduced number of leukapheresis. To address this issue, a multivariate logistic regression was carried out on several operational and laboratory parameters from 943 HPC-A collections performed in 600 hematological and oncological patients. We observed a CD34(+) cells collection efficiency (CE) >50% when patient's pre-apheresis total WBC count was lower than 12.5×10(6)/mL. At the same time, the likelihood of reaching the CD34(+) cells target dose/kg increased from 6 to 3 times when the pre-apheresis WBC count ×10(6)/mL t was below 4.3 (OR=6.1; 2.6-14.1) and between 4.3 and 7 (OR=2.8; 1.4-5.7) respectively when compared to a pre-apheresis WBC count >36×10(6)/mL.

Screening of related donors and peripheral blood stem cell collection practices at different Italian apheresis centres

BACKGROUND

Recommendations on eligibility criteria for donation of haematopoietic stem cells, management of collection of the cells and follow-up mainly concern unrelated donors. The aim of this study was to analyse the screening of related donors and collection practices at different Italian apheresis centres.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire regarding eligibility criteria for related haematopoietic stem cell donors, their peripheral blood collections and early follow-up was sent to several apheresis units. Data from the full charts of 500 candidates, screened between May 2005 and December 2009, were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The donors' records, eligibility criteria, collections and follow-up are managed differently in each centre. Of the 500 evaluable candidates (51.2% male, 49.8% female; median age 47 years, range 13-77), 26.4% underwent thorough screening according to Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry standards, while local protocols were applied to 73.6%; 91 candidates (18.2%) proved ineligible for donation. In the end, 352 donors (53.4% male, 46.6% female; median age 45 years, range 16-76) underwent 508 leukaphereses. Central venous catheters were used in 8.0% of donors, mainly in one centre. Unsuitable pre-apheresis peripheral blood parameters were reported in 38.7% of the aphereses. Leukapheresis-related adverse events were recorded in 23.0% of the procedures, with a drop-out rate of 0.2% for severe events. No donation-related fatalities occurred. The CD34+ cell yield was <2×10(6)/kg of recipient's body weight from 1.1% of donors ≥70 years old.

DISCUSSION

More uniformity in donor screening procedures, management of peripheral blood collection and follow-up should be planned at a national level to maximise the safety of related donors.

Who should be really considered as a poor mobilizer in the plerixafor era?

Patients with a number of peripheral CD34+ cells ≥20/μL have recently been defined in the literature as "poor mobilizers". We retrospectively reviewed medical records from a total of 248 patients affected by hematological malignancies or solid tumors undergoing peripheral blood stem cell collection following chemotherapy plus G-CSF. On the basis of the CD34+ cell peak in peripheral blood following mobilization therapy, patients were defined as good mobilizers (group A, CD34+ cells ≥20/μL), relative poor mobilizers (group B, CD34+ cells <20 and ≥8/μL) and absolute poor mobilizers (group C, CD34+ cells <8/μL). One hundred and seventy-seven (71%) patients resulted good mobilizers, 35 (14%) patients relative poor mobilizers and 36 (15%) patients absolute poor mobilizers. Target of stem cell collection was ≥2.0×10(6) CD34+cells/kg for each transplantation procedure. All patients in group A, 20 patients in group B (57%) and 1 patient in group C (2.7%) were able to collect ≥2.0×10(6) CD34+cells/kg. The multivariate analysis confirmed that more than three lines of previous chemotherapy and a previous autologous PBSC transplantation negatively affect mobilization of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood. Our data suggest that a number of CD34+ cells ≥20/μL does not always result in a failed stem cell collection and in fact in our patient series more than 70% of the patients defined as poor mobilizers have indeed collected the minimum number of 2.0×10(6) CD34+cells/kg required for a successful transplantation. The use of new agent such as CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor might further improve mobilization efficacy in such patients.