A two-step coagulation test to identify antibeta-glycoprotein I lupus anticoagulants

Lipid-binding antiphospholipid antibodies: significance for pathophysiology and diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of pathogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Since approximately 30 years ago, lipid-binding aPL, which do not require a protein cofactor, have been regarded as irrelevant for APS pathogenesis even though anticardiolipin are a diagnostic criterion of APS. In this review, we will summarize the available evidence from in vitro studies, animal models, and epidemiologic studies, which suggest that this concept is no longer tenable. Accordingly, we will only briefly touch on the role of other aPL in APS. This topic has been amply reviewed in detail elsewhere. We will discuss the consequences for laboratory diagnostics and future research required to resolve open questions related to the pathogenic role of different aPL specificities.

Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) employed in classification, and by default diagnosis, of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Detection of LA is not via calibrated assays but is based on functional behavior of the antibodies in a medley of coagulation assays. A prolonged clotting time in a screening test is followed by demonstration of phospholipid dependence and inhibitory properties in confirmatory and mixing tests, respectively, which are modifications of the parent screening test. Complications arise because no single screening test is sensitive to every LA, and no test is specific for LA, because they are prone to interference by other causes of elevated clotting times. Several screening tests are available but the pairing of dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) with LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is widely used and recommended because it is proven to have good detection rates. Nonetheless, judicious use of other assays can improve diagnostic performance, such as dilute prothrombin time to find LA unreactive with dRVVT and aPTT, and the recently validated Taipan snake venom time with ecarin time confirmatory test that are unaffected by vitamin K antagonist and direct factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulation. Expert body guidelines and their updates have improved harmonization of laboratory practices, although some issues continue to attract debate, such as the place of mixing tests in the medley hierarchy, and areas of data manipulation such as assay cut-offs and ratio generation. This article reviews current practices and challenges in the laboratory detection of LA.

The role of beta-2-glycoprotein I in health and disease associating structure with function: More than just APS

Beta-2-Glycoprotein I (β2GPI) plays a number of essential roles throughout the body. β2GPI, C-reactive protein and thrombomodulin are the only three proteins that possess the dual capability to up and down regulate the complement and coagulation systems depending upon external stimulus. Clinically, β2GPI is the primary antigen in the autoimmune condition antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is typically characterised by pregnancy morbidity and vascular thrombosis. This protein is also capable of adopting at least two distinct structural forms, but it has been argued that several other intermediate forms may exist. Thus, β2GPI is a unique protein with a key role in haemostasis, homeostasis and immunity. In this review, we examine the genetics, structure and function of β2GPI in the body and how these factors may influence its contribution to disease pathogenesis. We also consider the clinical implications of β2GPI in the diagnosis of APS and as a potentially novel therapeutic target.

Phospholipid inhibitors

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the association of arterial and/or venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications with the presence of at least one among the main antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (i. e., Lupus anticoagulants, LA, IgG and/ or IgM anticardiolipin antibodies, aCL, IgG and/or IgM antiβ2-glycoprotein I antibodies, aβ2-GPI). Several clinical studies have consistently reported that LA is a stronger risk factor for both arterial and venous thrombosis compared to aCL and aβ2-GPI. In particular, LA activity dependent on the first domain of β2-GPI and triple aPL positivity are associated with the risk of thrombosis and obstetrical complications.

Asymptomatic aPL-positive subjects do not require primary thromboprophylaxis. Venous thromboembolism is the most common initial clinical manifestation of APS. To prevent its recurrence indefinite anticoagulation is recommended. Long duration treatment with warfarin or aspirin is used after a first cerebral arterial thrombosis. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with or without aspirin is recommended to reduce the rate of obstetrical complications of APS pregnant women.

Plasma Antiphospholipid Antibodies Effects on Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Assays

BACKGROUND

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assays can be affected by plasma antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), but the degree of the interference is not easy to predict. This study aimed to investigate the effects on aPTT assay results of different types and combinations of aPLs, including anti-β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies, anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical information and laboratory tests from aPL-positive patients. The potential influence of aPLs on aPTT assays was assessed.

RESULTS

The survey included 589 aPL-positive patients. No significant differences existed in basic characteristics such as sex, age, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and alanine aminotransferase among different cases with 1, 2 or 3 types of positive-aPL markers (P > 0.05). In 113 patients with abnormal aPTT values, multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between an abnormal degree of aPTT values and dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) or silica clotting time (SCT) with a correlation coefficient of 0.437 or 0.497 (P < 0.01), whereas age, anticardiolipin antibodies-immunoglobulin G, anticardiolipin antibodies-immunoglobulin M and anti-β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies were of no significance (P > 0.05). Among blood samples with 3 types of aPLs positivity, the rate of abnormal aPTT detection values was 55.3%, which was significantly higher than that observed in patients with negative, single-positive or double-positive aPL markers (P < 0.05). Patients with a moderate to strong dRVVT or SCT had a higher proportion of abnormal aPTT assays than did patients with a low dRVVT or SCT (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When abnormal aPTT values are obtained, the influence of aPLs should be considered, especially in the presence of a moderate to strong dRVVT or SCT.

The challenges of lupus anticoagulants

The term "lupus anticoagulant" (LA) refers to a heterogeneous group of immunoglobulins behaving as acquired in vitro inhibitors of coagulation. These antibodies, namely anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies, induce the in vitro elongation of clotting time interfering with phospholipid-dependent coagulation cofactors. Positive LA is associated with thrombosis and pregnancy complications, providing one of the three laboratory criteria for the classification of the anti-phospholipid syndrome. LA is the strongest predictor of clinical events, especially when associated with other anti-phospholipid antibodies. Much more controversial is the risk conveyed by isolated and weak LA. LA detection is technically laborious, envisaging screening, mixing and confirming tests. Hopefully critical issues in LA detection, such as the interference of anticoagulants, will be overcome, in the next future.

Antiphospholipid antibody testing and standardization

The laboratory criteria that define patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). All assays show methodological shortcomings and the combination of the three tests, each with different sensitivity and specificity, and hence, differences in clinical utility make the laboratory diagnosis of APS challenging. Consensus guidelines and proposals for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) testing have been published in the last 20 years and have led to a substantial improvement. Despite efforts so far, standardization is not reached yet, but progress has been made. On-going efforts to reduce the interlaboratory/interassay variations remain important; even an absolute standardization cannot be feasibly achieved. Taking into account the methodological shortcomings of the means we have available, more detailed guidelines may help in adequate performance of aPL testing. This review will focus on the efforts and achievements in standardization and on the weaknesses and strengths of the current available laboratory methods.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: evaluation of the thrombotic risk

The laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) via antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), or anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies remains a challenge. Coagulation tests for LAC as well as solid phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI have methodological shortcomings, although for LAC large progress have been made in standardization. All assays are associated with clinical APS-criteria (thrombotic and/or pregnancy complications) but with limited specificity. Besides, clinical studies demonstrating the association between the presence of aPL and thrombosis are not always well designed and result in wide ranges of odds ratio with large variation between studies. The best association between thrombotic complications and aPL is found for LAC. The association between thrombosis and aCL or aβ2GPI is at least inconsistent. The inclusion of more specific assays, such as the domain-I-β2GPI.antibodies is too premature and depends on further investigation in large clinical studies and the commercial availability. The search for new assays should proceed to identify patients with aPL with increased risk for thrombosis, preferable in large prospective studies. Meanwhile, with the current available LAC, aCL and aβ2GPI assays it is strongly recommended to make antibody profiles. Multiple positivity of tests seems clinically more relevant. The strengths and weaknesses of the current laboratory criteria for APS are discussed in view of their role in risk stratification of patients with thrombotic events.

Correct laboratory approach to APS diagnosis and monitoring

Triple positivity (positive Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti β2-glycoptrotein I antibodies) identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (anti Domain I of β2-glycoptroteinI) that is present in patients with definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is supported by the fact that aβ2GPI antibodies obtained by affinity purification in these patients possess LA activity. Moreover, patients and carriers of this profile carry a much higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss than APS patients with positivity for only one of the tests. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as among carriers of aPL. Clinical studies and interventional trials should first take these high risk subjects into consideration.

Circulating β2 glycoprotein I-IgG anti-β2 glycoprotein I immunocomplexes in patients with definite antiphospholipid syndrome

Beta2-glycoprotein I (β(2)GPI), a relevant antigen in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), binds anionic macromolecules including heparin (Hep). A possible formation of ternary complexes between β(2)GPI, antibodies and Hep in APS is thus possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate Hep-β(2)GPI interaction in patients with APS. The affinity of Heps of different length, including unfractionated Hep (UFH), low-molecular weight Hep (enoxaparin) and pentasaccharide (fondaparinux), to human β(2)GPI was estimated by fluorescence spectroscopy, yielding dissociation constant (K(d)) values of 1.1, 24.0 and 89.4 µM, demonstrating that the longer UFH binds to β(2)GPI far more tightly than the shorter ones. Plasma and protein G-purified IgGs from eight patients with APS (i.e. five with thromboembolic disease and three with catastrophic APS), were fractionated by affinity chromatography using a Hep (UFH)-bound column, eluted with a linear NaCl gradient. For each chromatographic analysis, fractions were collected in the whole NaCl gradient and tested by ELISA for the presence of β(2)GPI and anti-β(2)GPI IgG. The results of Hep-affinity chromatography and ELISAs concurrently indicate that either β(2)GPI and anti-β(2)GPI IgG elute from the Hep column in the same chromatographic peak, at a retention time identical to that of the purified, isolated β(2)GPI, thus suggesting that circulating immunocomplexes containing β(2)GPI are present in patients with APS.

Lupus anticoagulant: performance of the tests as recommended by the latest ISTH guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is clinically the most relevant among all antiphospholipid antibody tests. Recently, new guidelines for LA detection were published. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare tests recommended under these guidelines with other methods used for LA detection.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 336 subjects suffering from various autoimmune diseases. We used activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), diluted Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and diluted prothrombin time (dPT) tests for LA detection together with a ratio between sensitive and insensitive aPTT reagent. We also tested if LA was dependent on β(2) glycoprotein I (β(2) GPI) using one of the recently described methods.

RESULTS

All LA tests performed were associated with a history of thrombosis. The highest odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis was found for β(2) GPI-dependent LA but sensitivity was low (OR = 8.4; specificity/sensitivity = 98%/15%). All LA tests showed a much stronger association with thrombosis than with pregnancy failure.

CONCLUSIONS

LA tested by aPTT and/or dRVVT (at least one out of two tests positive), as recommended by the guidelines, was associated less strongly with a history of thrombosis (OR = 4.1) than either of these tests separately (OR = 5.0 and 4.3, respectively). With both tests positive ('double LA positivity') the association with thrombosis was stronger (OR = 6.5) compared with only one positive test. In fact, 'double LA positivity', detected by combinations of any of the tests studied, was markedly associated with a history of thrombosis.

Antiphospholipid antibodies--we are not quite there yet

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome is predominantly made in the laboratory and depends on the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in individuals with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. Correct diagnosis of the syndrome is imperative to prevent unnecessary long secondary thromboprophylaxis. Three antiphospholipid antibody subtypes are included in the classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome: lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. Only lupus anticoagulants are undisputedly associated with thrombosis, which is why the serological criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome are under debate. All of the assays used to detect antiphospholipid antibodies are in need of better standardization, although progress has been made in the detection of lupus anticoagulants. The inconsistent association between both anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies and thrombosis is a cause for alarm. We are in need of better assays to detect those individuals at risk for thrombosis and population-based prospective studies to provide us with accurate risk assessments.

An international multicentre-laboratory evaluation of a new assay to detect specifically lupus anticoagulants dependent on the presence of anti-beta2-glycoprotein autoantibodies

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed by the simultaneous presence of vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity and detection of antiphospholipid antibodies in plasma.

OBJECTIVES

We have shown that prolongation of clotting time by anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) antibodies correlates better with thrombosis than a positive classic lupus anticoagulant (LAC) assay in a single center study. To confirm or falsify this finding we have conducted a multicenter study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 325 LAC-positive samples, we found that the beta2GPI-dependent LAC correlated 2.0 times better with thrombosis than the classic LAC assay. Although significant, this was a minimal improvement compared with the 'classic' LAC. It was published that calcium influences the behavior of anti-beta2GPI antibodies in coagulation assays. To investigate whether calcium plays a role in the present study, we divided the patient population into two groups: (i) blood was collected in 0.109 m sodium citrate and (ii) blood was drawn in 0.129 m sodium citrate as anticoagulant. We found that a positive result with the beta2GPI-dependent LAC assay correlated better with thrombosis [odds ratio (OR): 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-5.8] when 0.109 m sodium citrate was used compared with 0.129 m sodium citrate (OR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.1).

CONCLUSION

We were able to confirm in an international multicenter study that a positive result in a beta2GPI-dependent LAC assay correlates better with thrombosis than the classic LAC assay, but that the assay needs further study as it is sensitive to external factors such as the sodium citrate concentration used as anticoagulant in the test sample.

Challenges in the Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Background: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of acquired thromboembolic complications and pregnancy morbidity. Its diagnosis is based on clinical and laboratory criteria, defined by strict guidelines. The original clinical and laboratory criteria for the identification of APS patients were published in 1999, in the so-called Sapporo criteria. In 2006 these criteria were revised, and recently more precise guidelines for analysis of the lupus anticoagulant have been provided. However, several questions related to the diagnosis of APS remain unanswered.

Content: In addition to providing a historical perspective, this review covers several challenges in the diagnosis of APS with respect to clinical and laboratory features, while highlighting pathogenic pathways of the syndrome. We discuss ongoing dilemmas in the diagnosis of this complex disease. Although antiphospholipid antibodies are found in association with various clinical manifestations, the older established clinical criteria were not substantively altered in the 2006 update. Several laboratory tests recommended in the latest criteria, including phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests for the detection of the lupus anticoagulant and ELISAs for measuring anticardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, still show methodological and diagnostic shortcomings. In addition, antiphospholipid antibodies have been described against other antigens, but their clinical role remains uncertain.

Conclusions: Despite updated APS criteria, diagnosis of this syndrome remains challenging. Further research on clinically relevant antibodies and standardization of their detection are needed to improve clinical risk assessment in APS.

European attempts for the standardisation of the antiphospholipid antibodies

According to the Sydney criteria, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis is closely related to the demonstration of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients sera. For this purpose, three different assays are conventionally accepted: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies. LA, described in the 1950s is a coagulation-based functional assay, which indirectly detects the presence of aPL. The aCL ELISA was developed in 1985; the identification of β2GPI as a major target of aPL, allowed the introduction of anti-β2GPI ELISA. Even if the diagnostic criteria for APS have been well defined, the laboratory detection of aPL is not always reproducible for many reasons. To achieve a univocal diagnostic definition of APS, efforts were made to reduce the inter- and/or intra-laboratory variability of the diagnostic tests. In this article, we analyse the studies performed to standardise aPL assays that were developed within the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

Testing for lupus anticoagulants: all that a clinician should know

The presence of lupus anticoagulants (LA) in plasma alone or in combination with solid-phase antiphospholipid antibodies is an important prerequisite to define the antiphospholipid syndrome. The lack of specific tests to identify LA prompted standardization authorities to define a set of diagnostic criteria based on indirect evidence of the presence of LA and defined as screening, mixing and confirmatory studies. Accordingly, these studies must be carried out on patient plasmas and the relevant criteria satisfied before a firm diagnosis of LA can be made. Clinicians involved in LA testing should be aware of the limits which are inherent to this diagnosis, especially in patients who at the time of testing are on heparin and/or oral anticoagulant treatment, or are close to the acute thrombotic event. This article is aimed at reviewing the current situation and the light and shadows associated with this diagnostic procedure.

How we diagnose the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilia, characterized by the occurrence of venous and arterial events. This article examines the laboratory and key clinical aspects of APS. Particular focus is given to anti–beta 2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies in view of their recent inclusion in the APS classification criteria. The clinical utility of using the β2GPI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in conjunction with the established lupus anticoagulant assays and cardiolipin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, for diagnosing and risk stratifying patients suspected of having APS is discussed. The relative importance of the various assays in diagnosing obstetric APS (early and late gestation miscarriages) is explored. The implications of recent epidemiologic findings for possibly understanding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of obstetric APS are highlighted. Insights into which patients with obstetric APS may be at most risk of thrombotic complications are presented.

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a multisystem autoimmune disease, characterized by recurrent vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy losses in the presence of persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. In clinical practice, testing for anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant is mandatory for the laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Identification of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is important, as prophylactic anticoagulant therapy may prevent thrombosis from recurring, and treatment during pregnancy can improve fetal and maternal outcome.

Influence of different IgG anticardiolipin antibody cut-off values on antiphospholipid syndrome classification

BACKGROUND

While medium to high titers of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies, defined as >40 GPL units or >99th percentile, is a laboratory criteria for the 'definite' diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), agreement between the two cut-offs has not been validated.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the current aCL laboratory criterion by verifying the effect of the two cut-offs on APS classification.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Ninety aCL positive APS patients were selected on the basis of their GPL values above the 99th percentile (17.4 GPL), which was calculated by testing 100 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the IgG positivity (P < 0.0001) was found between the APS laboratory profiles as 20 out of the 24 (83.3%) patients with single positivity (aCL alone), six out of the 23 (26.1%) with double positivity (aCL plus lupus anticoagulant or anti-beta(2)glycoprotein I), and none out of the 43 with triple positivity (aCL plus lupus anticoagulant and anti-beta(2)glycoprotein I) had titers between the 99th percentile and 40 GPL units. Moreover, the rate of aCL values between the 99th percentile and 40 GPL units was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in patients with pregnancy morbidity (73.7%) as compared to those with vascular thrombosis (16.9%) and those with both conditions (16.7%).

CONCLUSION

The 99th percentile cut-off level seems more sensitive than the >40 GPL value for APS classification, as it includes subjects with aCL positivity alone as well as patients with pregnancy morbidity.

The Activated Seven Lupus Anticoagulant Assay Detects Clinically Significant Antibodies

Lupus anticoagulants are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies detected by their effects on phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays. Persistent lupus anticoagulants are associated with thrombotic disease, but not all are clinically significant. Antibody heterogeneity and reagent and test variability dictate that at least 2 tests, of different types, should be used to screen lupus anticoagulants. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies. Eighty-two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 32 with systemic lupus erythematosus + positive for activated seven lupus anticoagulant and who were without thrombosis, who were positive by activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, were investigated for lupus anticoagulants by dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, and Taipan snake venom time, and for anticardiolipin antibodies. Fifty-seven of the APS patients were positive for lupus anticoagulants in multiple assays, 25 in activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone. Fourteen of the latter group were previously positive in other antiphospholipid antibodies assays, and 11 had only been positive for lupus anticoagulants by activated seven lupus anticoagulant. Twenty-eight had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies, 6 of whom were from the group that was positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant only. Eight of the systemic lupus erythematosus + lupus anticoagulants (without thrombosis) patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant by activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone and had only been positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant previously, and none had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. The remaining 24 patients were lupus-anticoagulant positive in multiple assays, and 9 had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. Dilute Russell's viper venom time and Dilute activated partial thromboplastin time are widely used to detect lupus anticoagulants and are considered to detect clinically significant antibodies. Activated seven lupus anticoagulant detected antibodies in APS patients who were positive by these assays and also lupus anticoagulants undetectable by the dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute activated partial thromboplastin time reagents used, demonstrating its utility as a first-line or second-line assay.

Mechanisms of disease: antiphospholipid antibodies-from clinical association to pathologic mechanism

The discovery that antiphospholipid antibodies recognize plasma proteins that bind to phospholipids rather than recognizing phospholipids themselves has been a major advance in research into antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). It is now established that beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2 GPI) is the most important antigen for antiphospholipid antibodies. However, the possible pathologic mechanism is still much debated. This is mainly because not all patients with anti-beta2 GPI antibodies show clinical symptoms that are related to APS. Several reports indicate that anti-beta2 GPI antibodies with lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity are clinically of much importance. Most patients with LA caused by anti-beta2 GPI antibodies suffer from thrombosis as a result of recognition of the first domain of beta2 GPI by these antibodies. In the search for a pathologic mechanism that might explain the high occurrence of thrombosis in patients with anti-domain I antibodies (LA-causing anti-beta2 GPI antibodies), it was found that these antibodies show increased resistance to the anticoagulant activity of annexin A5. We have shown that the same population of antibodies also displays increased resistance to activated protein C. Owing to the diversity of clinical symptoms related to APS, it is likely that other pathologic mechanisms also contribute to the occurrence of APS-related symptoms.

The obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

The association of persistent presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies and thromboembolic events, (recurrent) pregnancy loss or both is termed antiphospholipid syndrome. Pregnancies in women with the syndrome should be regarded as at high-risk for complications. Optimal management consisting of close follow-up and pharmacological treatment can result in about 70-80% live births. Apart from the laboratory diagnosis of the syndrome and pathophysiology, this review will focus on treatment during pregnancy.

Current insight into diagnostics and pathophysiology of the antiphospolipid syndrome

The diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome, a non-inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, depends greatly upon laboratory diagnostics. The diagnostic value of all available assays to detect antiphospholipid antibodies and the anticardiolipin assay in particular, is a matter of ongoing debate. Although the presence of lupus anticoagulant correlates best with thrombosis, accurate determination is not always possible due to anticoagulant treatment. Data on the predictive value of alternatives such as the anti-beta2-glycoprotein I and the anti-prothrombin antibody assay are insufficient and prospective cohort studies are needed. Determining antiphospholipid antibody profiles seems to increase diagnostic specificity. Substantial progress has been made in unravelling the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the antiphospholipid syndrome. Several cellular receptors for antibody-beta2-glycoprotein I complexes have been identified and their roles in cellular activation are being investigated. In vivo data should provide more insight into the importance of the interaction with individual receptors.

Laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulants: a review of issues affecting results

BACKGROUND

Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are a heterogeneous class of immunoglobulins. Persistent LA positivity is a risk factor for the occurrence and recurrence of venous/arterial thromboembolism and/or pregnancy morbidity and qualifies the patient for anticoagulation therapy. The laboratory diagnosis for LA that is used for crucial decision-making about the optimal duration of the therapy rests entirely on diagnostic criteria. These criteria are based on the prolongation of phospholipid-dependent tests not corrected upon mixing patient and normal plasmas, with confirmation provided by the evidence that the anticoagulant is directed against proteins bound to negatively charged phospholipids.

AIMS

This article reviews issues related to the diagnosis of LA, including the effect of preanalytical variables, choice of tests, results interpretation of screening, mixing and confirmation procedures, patients to be investigated, and transmission of results. Unresolved issues and future direction for research on laboratory diagnosis are also discussed.

METHODS

Search of PubMed with the key term "lupus anticoagulant" plus articles and unpublished data known to the author.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The preanalytical variables (i.e., plasma preparation and storage before analysis) as well as the diagnostic steps to detect LA present potential problems that undermine the process of making a correct diagnosis. A truly specific test for LA detection is badly needed, but its development may require understanding of the mechanisms associated with the occurrence of clinical events. Until then, clinical laboratories should rely on the existing procedures, which must be applied with caution and awareness of the many issues that may affect their results.

A functional coagulation test to identify anti-β2-glycoprotein I dependent lupus anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Lupus Anticoagulants (LAC) activity due to beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI) antibodies shows a high correlation with thrombotic events. Since the binding of beta(2)GPI antibodies to phospholipids may be influenced by the final calcium chloride (CaCl(2)) concentration a discrimination between beta(2)GPI dependent LAC and beta(2)GPI independent LAC could be possible using clotting tests with various CaCl(2) concentrations and making them this way more sensitive to the presence of beta(2)GPI antibodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

I evaluated the effect of 5 mM, 8.3 mM, 10.3 mM and 17.9 mM final CaCl(2) concentration in a commonly used screening test for LAC, the PTT-LA, on LAC positive patients with and without beta(2)GPI antibodies.

RESULTS

Mean coagulation times of LAC patients negative for beta(2)GPI antibodies were significant shorter with 5 mM CaCl(2) in comparison with 8.3 mM and 10 mM (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively). In the LAC patients with positive beta(2)GPI antibodies no significant difference at 5 mM CaCl(2), 8.3 mM or 10 mM was observed. Mean coagulation times at 5 mM CaCl(2) were significant higher (P=0.003) in patients positive for beta(2)GPI antibodies than in patients negative for beta(2)GPI antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The most remarkable observation was that the coagulation time, measured by PTT-LA at low final CaCl(2) concentration, is much more prolonged in the LAC positive beta(2)GPI antibody positive patients than in the LAC positive beta(2)GPI antibody negative patients. Thus, the competition with clotting factors for binding on phospholipids is stronger for beta(2)GPI antibodies than for other antibodies and explains the longer coagulation times in the presence of beta(2)GPI antibodies.

Diagnostic biologique du syndrome des antiphospholipides

PURPOSE

The antiphospholipid syndrome is a bioclinical entity defined by the occurrence of thromboses, and/or obstetrical complications in the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, i.e. lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin antibodies. This review focuses on the methods for antiphospholipid antibodies detection and their clinical usefulness.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Lupus anticoagulant is the strongest risk factor for thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome. Twenty years after its description, anticardiolipin ELISA, despite a still improvable standardization and its lack of specificity, is still required for sensitive diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

A better knowledge of the beta-2-glycoprotein-I role in the pathophysiology of antiphospholipid syndrome might lead to the development of new markers of thrombotic risk.

International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

New clinical, laboratory and experimental insights, since the 1999 publication of the Sapporo preliminary classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), had been addressed at a workshop in Sydney, Australia, before the Eleventh International Congress on antiphospholipid antibodies. In this document, we appraise the existing evidence on clinical and laboratory features of APS addressed during the forum. Based on this, we propose amendments to the Sapporo criteria. We also provide definitions on features of APS that were not included in the updated criteria.

Pathophysiology of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a distinct disorder with the clinical features of recurrent thrombosis in the venous or arterial circulation and fetal losses. Its serological marker is the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in the blood of these patients. The relation between the presence of antibodies against anionic phospholipids and thromboembolic complications is well established over the last 25 years but the pathophysiology of the syndrome is largely unclear. Even after all these years, there is a persisting debate about the specificity and sensitivity of the assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies. We now accept that antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I rather than to anionic phospholipids are the major pathological antibodies, although there is no clear consensus on how the presence of these antibodies correlates with the different clinical manifestations of the syndrome. In this review, we discuss the current methods of detection of the antibodies and our insight into the pathobiology of the syndrome. We propose a mechanism for describing how the presence of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies relates to the different clinical manifestations observed.

The antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical characteristics, laboratory features and pathogenesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by the paradoxical linkage between thrombosis in vivo and prolongation of clotting times in vitro. Recent reports that are discussed in this overview have taught us that this inconsistency is not so incomprehensible after all.

RECENT FINDINGS

Only a subpopulation of the heterogeneous population of antiphospholipid antibodies is pathogenic. New hypotheses have been proposed to explain the thrombotic tendency in this syndrome. In contrast to what is generally thought, it seems that the increased risk of thrombotic complication is independent of chronic vascular disease.

SUMMARY

The latest developments could make it possible to define patients with the syndrome unambiguously. This is absolutely necessary to facilitate studies designed to test the current hypotheses on the pathophysiology of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Inhibition of APC anticoagulant activity on oxidized phospholipid by anti-{beta}2-glycoprotein I monoclonal antibodies

Activated protein C (APC) anticoagulant activity and the ability to be inhibited by auto-antibodies associated with thrombosis are strongly augmented by the presence of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phospholipid oxidation. beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)-GPI) is a major antigen for antiphospholipid antibodies present in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome. We therefore investigated whether anti-beta(2)-GPI monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could inhibit APC with similar membrane specificity. Five mouse mAbs that reacted with different epitopes on beta(2)-GPI were examined. Each inhibited the PE-, phospholipid oxidation-dependent enhancement of APC anticoagulant activity and required antibody divalency. A chimeric APC that retains anticoagulant activity but is relatively unaffected by protein S, PE, or oxidation was not inhibited by the antibodies. In purified systems, anti-beta(2)-GPI mAb inhibition of factor Va inactivation was greater in the presence of protein S and required beta(2)-GPI. Surprisingly, although the mAbs did increase beta(2)-GPI affinity for membranes, PE and oxidation had little influence on the affinity of the beta(2)-GPI antibody complex for the membrane vesicles. We conclude that antibodies to beta(2)-GPI inhibit APC function specifically and contribute to a hypercoaguable state by disrupting specific protein-protein interactions induced by oxidation of PE-containing membranes.

Apolipoprotein H (apoH)-dependent autoantibodies and apoH protein polymorphism in selected patients showing lupus anticoagulant activity

Apolipoprotein H (apoH) is considered to be a necessary cofactor for the binding of certain antiphospholipid antibodies to anionic phospholipids. Some apoH-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies also exert lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity, which seems to depend on antiphospholipid antibody epitope specificity. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of less frequent

Antiphospholipid antibodies: update on detection, pathophysiology, and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The antiphospholipid syndrome is a noninflammatory disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in the plasma of patients with venous or arterial thrombosis or obstetric complications. Understanding of the pathology of the syndrome is only rudimentary and no physician can pretend that treatment is adequate. It is not possible to identify patients with the syndrome for certain. This paper reviews the substantial and promising headway made in the past year.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has become clear that lupus anticoagulant is the assay of choice to detect the syndrome and that antibodies directed towards beta2Glycoprotein 1 are the clinical relevant autoantibodies. These antibodies are able to activate a number of cells involved in the regulation of hemostasis.

SUMMARY

The latest developments will make it soon possible to define patient with the syndrome unambiguously. This is absolutely necessary to understand why the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies cause an increased thrombotic risk.