Impact of progestagens on activated protein C (APC) resistance among users of oral contraceptives

Thromboembolic risk with gender-affirming hormone therapy: potential role of global coagulation and fibrinolysis assays

Gender-affirming hormonal therapies are a critical component of the care of transgender individuals. Transgender people are commonly prescribed estrogen or testosterone to promote male-to-female or female-to-male transitions and to preserve gender-specific characteristics long-term. However, some exogenous hormones, especially certain estrogen preparations, are an established risk factor of thrombosis. As the number of individuals seeking gender-based care is rising, there is an urgent need to identify and characterize the mechanisms underlying hormone-associated thrombosis and incorporate this information into clinical algorithms for diagnosis and management. Herein, we discuss historical evidence on the incidence of thrombosis and changes in plasma composition in transgender and cisgender cohorts. We present 3 case studies to demonstrate knowledge gaps in thrombosis risk stratification and prediction tools. We also present data from in vitro coagulation and fibrinolysis assays and discuss how information from these kinds of assays may be used to help guide the clinical management of transgender individuals.

High risk oral contraceptive hormones do not directly enhance endothelial cell procoagulant activity in vitro

BACKGROUND

Oral contraceptive (OC) use increases venous thromboembolism risk 2-5-fold. Procoagulant changes can be detected in plasma from OC users even without thrombosis, but cellular mechanisms that provoke thrombosis have not been identified. Endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction is thought to initiate venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether OC hormones provoke aberrant procoagulant activity in ECs.

OBJECTIVE

Characterize the effect of high-risk OC hormones (ethinyl estradiol [EE] and drospirenone) on EC procoagulant activity and the potential interplay with nuclear estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ and inflammatory processes.

METHODS

Human umbilical vein and dermal microvascular ECs (HUVEC and HDMVEC, respectively) were treated with EE and/or drospirenone. Genes encoding the estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ (ESR1 and ESR2, respectively) were overexpressed in HUVEC and HDMVEC via lentiviral vectors. EC gene expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. The ability of ECs to support thrombin generation and fibrin formation was measured by calibrated automated thrombography and spectrophotometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Neither EE nor drospirenone, alone or together, changed expression of genes encoding anti- or procoagulant proteins (TFPI, THBD, F3), integrins (ITGAV, ITGB3), or fibrinolytic mediators (SERPINE1, PLAT). EE and/or drospirenone did not increase EC-supported thrombin generation or fibrin formation, either. Our analyses indicated a subset of individuals express ESR1 and ESR2 transcripts in human aortic ECs. However, overexpression of ESR1 and/or ESR2 in HUVEC and HDMVEC did not facilitate the ability of OC-treated ECs to support procoagulant activity, even in the presence of a pro-inflammatory stimulus.

CONCLUSIONS

The OC hormones EE and drospirenone do not directly enhance thrombin generation potential of primary ECs in vitro.

Efficacy and Safety of Megestrol in the Hospitalized Older Person

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of megestrol for off-label use in older patients with weight loss. Design Retrospective, nonblinded cohort study. Setting Upstate University Hospital is a 420-bed facility and academic medical center with a level 1 trauma center. Upstate Community Hospital is a 314-bed acute care/hospital/ambulatory care center and long-term care hospital that also provides teaching services. Participants Patients 65 years of age and older without malignancy or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who were initiated and continued megestrol therapy at the Upstate University hospitals for at least two weeks were included. Of the 1,290 patients initially screened, 16 patients on megestrol were evaluated. An age- and gender-matched control group of 16 patients was utilized for comparison of changes in weight and other variables. Interventions Patients in the megestrol group have received daily doses of megestrol between 160 mg to 800 mg for an average duration of 19 days. Patients in the control group had no history or current use of megestrol utilization. Main Outcome Measurements The primary outcome was an increase in weight. Secondary outcome measures included albumin and thromboembolic events. Changes in weight and albumin were also compared with the control group. Results At a mean duration of 19 days, there was no significant difference in weight gain (0.95 kg, OR = 1.33 [95% CI -1.615-3.527]). Albumin decreased by (0.4 g/dL OR = 0.916 [95% CI 0.12-0.78]) and none of the patients developed a thromboembolic event. Conclusion In older hospitalized patients, megestrol did not increase weight, and did not improve albumin. No thromboembolic events were observed, but this may be because of a limited duration of observation of therapy and the routine use of anticoagulation prophylaxis in the inpatient setting.

Oral Contraceptives and Venous Thromboembolism: Focus on Testing that May Enable Prediction and Assessment of the Risk

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) induce several changes in the levels of coagulation factors. The levels of procoagulant factors are often increased, while levels of anticoagulant factors are decreased. Fibrinolysis is also affected, even if the effect seems to be more counterbalanced by opposite regulation of profibrinolytic and antifibrinolytic factors. These effects on hemostasis are more pronounced with third- or fourth-generation COC compared with second-generation COC. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk increases when multiple risk factors, including genetic and environmental, are present simultaneously. COC use causes changes in coagulation that modify the prothrombotic state induced by preexisting hemostatic alterations in a supra-additive manner. Therefore, testing appears to be of importance not only before implementing COC but also to monitor any potential thrombogenicity induced by COC therapy. Inherited genetic factors, such as factor V Leiden, G20210A prothrombin mutation, antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiencies, non-O blood group, as well as CYP2C9*2 and the rs4379368 mutations, have all been identified as genetic predictive risk factors of VTE in women. Nevertheless, the screening of these genetic biomarkers is not capable of assessing the phenotypic expression of the risk. This review will focus on the different options for screening the thrombogenic status in this population. Specific attention will be given to the endogenous thrombin potential-based activated protein C resistance, a test aiming at assessing the thrombogenicity induced by hormonal therapies and inherited or acquired thrombophilia.

Proof of concept of a new scale for the harmonization and the standardization of the ETP-based APC resistance

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the activated protein C resistance (APCr) based on the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) is recommended during the development of steroid contraceptives. Results are usually expressed as "normalized APC sensitivity ratio" (nAPCsr) using a reference plasma that should achieve an ETP ratio of 0.1 in presence of exogenous APC. Because of the interassay variability, achieving exactly an ETP ratio of 0.1 in each run is almost impossible, which significantly affects the theoretical 0-10 scale of nAPCsr.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the nAPCsr to the nAPCsr10 , a newly proposed method to express the degree of APC resistance.

METHODS

Individual plasma samples (n = 854) were analyzed to compare nAPCsr and nAPCsr10 . These values were obtained using the validated ETP-based APCr assay.

RESULTS

The Spearman correlation between nAPCsr and nAPCsr10 had a coefficient of 0.99. Linear regression showed the following equation y = 0.9315*x + 0.03942 (r2  = .97). When differences (nAPCsr10 - nAPCsr) were plotted against nAPCsr10 , the mean difference equaled 0.16% or 4.95%. The correction obtained with the use of the nAPCsr10 showed that the results of the nAPCsr were statistically different (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This new scale provides a harmonization and normalization of the nAPCsr. Results show a better reproducibility with the nAPCsr10 . It avoids the additional variability and the unharmonized scale introduced by the use of a reference plasma. This adapted method for the calculation of the APC resistance could provide the regulatory and scientific bodies with more reproducible and harmonized evaluations.

The effects of oral contraceptive usage on thrombin generation and activated protein C resistance in Saudi women, with a possible impact of the body mass index

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The effect of oral contraceptive (OC) usage on coagulation has been studied worldwide. However, no such studies have been conducted in Saudi Arabia on Saudi women using OCs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of OC-induced changes of thrombin generation (TG) in the absence and presence of activated protein C (APC) or thrombomodulin (TM) in Saudi women.

METHODS

A total of 115 adult women, 47 on oral contraception (OC users) and 68 controls (not using OCs) were recruited from the obstetrics-gynecology outpatient clinic in Saudi Arabia. OCs that were used in this study include the following: Marvelon, Gynera, Cerrazetem, Yasmine, Microlut, Gracial and Diane. The plasma calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) was used to determine TG which was expressed as endogenous thrombin potential (ETP; nM/min), lag time (min), peak (nM) and time-to-peak (ttpeak; min). In the presence of TM or APC, TG parameters were expressed relative to the parameters in the absence of TM or APC.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

As in other populations, our study demonstrated that OC usage induced prothrombotic changes in plasma of Saudi women, including resistance to the inhibitory actions of TM and APC. More specifically, OC usage in our population predominantly influenced TG and APC/TM sensitivity in overweight and obese individuals, a finding that needs confirmation in large cohort studies. The effects of APC and TM on TG parameters showed a positive association, and the correlation coefficients were higher in OC users for both ETP and peak values.

Progestin-only contraception and thromboembolism: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Women with medical conditions associated with increased risk for thrombosis generally should not use estrogen-containing contraceptives; however, less is known about progestin-only contraceptives (POCs) and thrombosis risk.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to identify evidence regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboembolism [stroke or acute myocardial infarction (AMI)] among women using POCs.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for all articles published from database inception through January 2016 for studies examining thrombosis among women using POCs. We included studies which examined women with medical conditions associated with thrombosis risk, as well as studies of women in the general population (either without these conditions or who were not specified to have these conditions). Hormonal contraceptives of interest included progestin-only pills (POPs), injectables, implants and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs). Outcomes of interest included VTE, stroke and AMI.

RESULTS

There were 26 articles of good to poor quality that met inclusion criteria; 9 studies examined women with medical conditions and 20 examined women in the general population. Two studies found that, among smokers and women with certain thrombogenic mutations, use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) had elevated odds of VTE compared with nonsmokers or those without mutations, although confidence intervals were wide and overlapped with odds among nonusers. One study found that, among women with previous VTE, use of POCs (including DMPA) was associated with a nonsignificant increased odds of recurrent VTE (all of which were among DMPA users); two other studies that examined POCs other than DMPA did not observe an association with recurrent VTE. Two studies found that use of DMPA among healthy women was also associated with increased odds of VTE. Two studies found that use of POCs for therapeutic indications was associated with increased odds of VTE. Studies did not find increased odds of VTE with POPs for contraceptive purposes, implants or LNG-IUDs nor were there increased odds of stroke or AMI with any POCs.

CONCLUSION

The majority of evidence identified by this systematic review did not suggest an increase in odds for venous or arterial events with use of most POCs. Limited evidence suggested increased odds of VTE with use of injectables (three studies) and use of POCs for therapeutic indications (two studies, one with POCs unspecified and the other with POPs). Any increase in risk likely translates to a small increase in absolute numbers of thrombotic events at the population level.

The effect of different hormonal contraceptives on plasma levels of free protein S and free TFPI

Use of combined oral contraceptives is associated with a three- to six-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. Hormonal contraceptives induce acquired resistance to activated protein C (APC), which predicts the risk of venous thrombosis. The biological basis of the acquired APC resistance is unknown. Free protein S (PS) and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) are the two main determinants of APC. Our objective was to assess the effect of both hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptives with different routes of administration on free TFPI and free PS levels. We conducted an observational study in 243 users of different contraceptives and measured APC sensitivity ratios (nAPCsr), free TFPI and free PS levels. Users of contraceptives with the highest risk of venous thrombosis as reported in recent literature, had the lowest free TFPI and free PS levels, and vice versa, women who used contraceptives with the lowest risk of venous thrombosis had the highest free TFPI and free PS levels. An association was observed between levels of free TFPI and nAPCsr, and between free PS and nAPCsr. The effect of oral contraceptives on TFPI and PS is a possible explanation for the increased risk of venous thrombosis associated with oral contraceptives.

Hormonal contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: an epidemiological update

Since the early 1960s, it has been well documented that combined hormonal contraceptives increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Newer generation of oral formulations, as well as non-oral contraceptives (transdermal and vaginal), have been recently studied for thrombotic risk. This review provides a summary of the association between hormonal contraceptives and venous thromboembolism with emphasis on new formulations of hormonal contraceptives as well as route of administration. A systematic search of Medline database was done for all relevant articles which included women having used third generation pills, and the development of new progestins. Eligible articles published in English and reporting the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis) among users of hormonal contraceptives were reviewed. A quantitative assessment was made from included studies. Current use of drospirenone or cyproterone oral combined contraceptives increased the risk of VTE compared with second generation pills (pooled OR: 1.7; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.4-2.2 and OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.3, respectively). In the context of contraceptive use, non-oral route of ethinyl-estradiol administration seems to be more thrombogenic than oral route. In contrast, low doses of both oral progestin contraceptives and intrauterine levonorgestrel could be safe with respect to VTE risk. In conclusion, newer generation formulations of hormonal contraceptives, as well as the non-oral hormonal contraceptive, seem to be more thrombogenic than second generation hormonal contraceptives.

Comparison of the impact of four generations of progestins on hemostatic variables

This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of progestins as part of low-estrogen (ethinyl estradiol [EE2] ≤35 μg) combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on hemostatic variables. One hundred ninety-five healthy women took oral contraceptives with following formulations: 35 EE2/norgestimate (NGM), 35 EE2/cyproterone acetate, 35 EE2/norethisterone, 30 EE2/levonorgestrel, 30 EE2/drospirenone (DRSP), 20 EE2/gestodene, and 20 EE2/DRSP, for 6 months. Hemostatic assays (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, resistance to activated protein C ratio, protein C, protein S, factor VIII [FVIII], antithrombin, plasminogen, α2-antiplasmin, inhibitor of plasminogen activator type 1 [PAI-1] and d-dimers) were performed in 3 time points: at baseline, after 3, and 6 cycles. For each formulation, results were compared according to baseline values, intergroup analysis, and the amount of estrogen or progestin component. Most of the variables were changed except FVIII. Significant difference between oral contraceptives was found in antithrombin, protein C, protein S activities, and PAI-1 values, but changes were mostly within reference range.

Oral versus vaginal combined hormonal contraceptives' effect on coagulation and inflammatory biomarkers among young adult women

In order to compare the effect of combined oral contraceptive (COC) and combined vaginal contraceptive (CVC) methods on the inflammation and procoagulation, we recruited female participants in 3 groups: control participants, COC users, and CVC users. We measured different blood biomarkers. The users of both COC and CVC had higher levels of C-reactive protein (P < .0001) and factor VII (P < .0001). However, CD40 ligand was only higher for COC users (P < .0001) and not the CVC users. Even though the levels of thrombin/antithrombin III were not higher for COC and CVC users, as compared to the controls, CVC users had higher levels as compared to COC users (P = .0327). As compared to the control group, we observed higher levels von Willebrand factor among CVC users but not the COC users. Longitudinal studies with larger sample size are needed to better assess the inflammatory and procoagulation response due to CVC use.

Metabolic effects of contraceptive steroids

Estrogen and progestins have been used by millions of women as effective combined contraceptives. The safety of hormonal contraceptives has been documented by years of follow-up and serious adverse events that may be related to their use are rare in the young population exposed to these agents. The balance between the benefits and the risks of contraceptive steroids is generally positive in particular when comparing to the risks of pregnancy and especially in women with risk factors. The metabolic changes induced by the synthetic steroids used in contraception, such as lipoprotein changes, insulin response to glucose, and coagulation factors have been considered as potential markers of cardiovascular and venous risk. Observations of these effects have led to modifications of the composition of hormonal contraceptive in order to minimize these changes and hence potentially decrease the risks. The synthetic estrogen Ethinyl-Estradiol (EE) exerts a stronger effect that natural estradiol (E2) on hepatic metabolism including estrogen-dependent markers such as liver proteins. This stronger hepatic impact of EE has been related to its 17α-ethinyl group which prevents the inactivation of the molecule and results in a more pronounced hepatic effect of EE as compared to estradiol. Due to its strong activity, administering EE via a non-oral route does not prevent its impact on liver proteins. In order to circumvent the metabolic changes induced by EE, newer products using more natural compounds such as estradiol (E2) and estradiol valerate (E2V) have been introduced. The synthetic progestins used for contraception are structurally related either to testosterone (T) (estranes and gonanes) or to progesterone (pregnanes and 19-norpregnanes). Several new progestins have been designed to bind more specifically to the progesterone receptor and to minimize side-effects related to androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid receptor interactions. Dienogest (DNG), and drospirenone (DRSP) and the 19-norpregnanes including Nestorone® (NES), nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) and trimegestone (TMG) have been combined with estrogen either EE or E2 or estradiol valerate (E2V). Risks and benefits of the newer progestins used in contraception depend upon the type of molecular structure, the type and dose of estrogen associated in a combination and the route of administration. The lower metabolic impact of estradiol-based combinations may result in an improved safety profile, but large surveillance studies are warranted to confirm this plausible hypothesis. So far, the contraindications and warnings for use of current COCs also apply to the estradiol-based COCs.

Controversies in postpartum contraception: when is it safe to start oral contraceptives after childbirth?

The timely initiation of contraception postpartum is an important consideration for breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women; many women prefer oral contraceptive pills to other methods. In breastfeeding women, combined hormonal pills are not recommended prior to 6 weeks postpartum, due to effects on milk production. Although progestogen-only pills do not adversely affect milk, lack of data regarding possible effects on infants exposed to progestogens in breastmilk renders timing of initiation of this method controversial. In non-breastfeeding women, elevated risk of venous thromboembolism restricts use of combined hormonal pills prior to 21 days postpartum. From 21 to 42 days, use of combined hormonal pills should be assessed based on a woman's personal venous thromboembolism risk profile; after 42 days postpartum there is no restriction in the use of combined hormonal pills for otherwise healthy women. Non-breastfeeding women may safely use progestogen-only pills at any time during the postpartum.

Sex difference in risk of recurrent venous thrombosis and the risk profile for a second event

BACKGROUND

The risk of recurrent venous thrombosis is higher in men than in women, and this is so far unexplained. We set out to determine the influence of age, time between first and second event, type of first event, oral contraception, pregnancy and surgery.

METHODS

We performed a prospective follow-up study of 474 patients with a first objective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, aged 18-70 years (Leiden Thrombophilia Study cohort).

RESULTS

During 3477 person-years of follow-up, 90 recurrences occurred. The overall incidence rates of recurrence (IRs) were 40.9 per 1000 person-years in men and 15.8 per 1000 person-years in women. Men with an unprovoked first event had the highest risk of recurrence, with almost one-third experiencing a second unprovoked event within 8 years (IR 41.2 per 1000 person-years). This risk was three-fold lower in women [IR 14.2 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.7)]. Age at diagnosis had little effect on recurrence rate, and nor had time elapsed since the first event. In women, almost half of the recurrences were provoked and were mainly related to oral contraceptive use or pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher recurrence rate in men than in women is not the result of differences in the environmental or transient risk factors that we studied. The risk profile for a second thrombotic event is clearly different from that of a first.

Mechanisms of estrogen-induced venous thromboembolism

The use of oral contraceptives (OC) is a well established risk factor for venous thrombosis. It has been known for many years that almost all haemostatic parameters i.e. plasma levels of coagulation factors, anticoagulant proteins and proteins involved in the fibrinolytic pathway change during OC use. The discovery of several risk factors of venous thrombosis in the 1990s shed new light on the association between the effects of OC on the haemostatic system and the increased risk of venous thrombosis. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the effects of different kinds of hormonal contraceptives (OC, transdermal contraceptives, vaginal ring and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device) on haemostatic variables and the relationship between the changes of these variables and the risk of venous thrombosis.

Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Risk of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism

Objective— Oral estrogen therapy increases venous thromboembolism risk among postmenopausal women. Although recent data showed transdermal estrogens may be safe with respect to thrombotic risk, the impact of the route of estrogen administration and concomitant progestogens is not fully established.

Methods and Results— We used data from the E3N French prospective cohort of women born between 1925 and 1950 and biennially followed by questionnaires from 1990. Study population consisted of 80 308 postmenopausal women (average follow-up: 10.1 years) including 549 documented idiopathic first venous thromboembolism. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional models. Compared to never-users, past-users of hormone therapy had no increased thrombotic risk (HR=1.1; 95% CI: 0.8 to 1.5). Oral not transdermal estrogens were associated with increased thrombotic risk (HR=1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.8 and HR=1.1; 95% CI: 0.8 to 1.8; homogeneity: P =0.01). The thrombotic risk significantly differed by concomitant progestogens type (homogeneity: P <0.01): there was no significant association with progesterone, pregnanes, and nortestosterones (HR=0.9; 95% CI: 0.6 to 1.5, HR=1.3; 95% CI: 0.9 to 2.0 and HR=1.4; 95% CI: 0.7 to 2.4). However, norpregnanes were associated with increased thrombotic risk (HR=1.8; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.7).

Conclusions— In this large study, we found that route of estrogen administration and concomitant progestogens type are 2 important determinants of thrombotic risk among postmenopausal women using hormone therapy. Transdermal estrogens alone or combined with progesterone might be safe with respect to thrombotic risk.

Thrombophilic conditions in the adolescent: the gynecologic impact

As Virchow's triad suggests, a fine balance exists between the vascular wall, intravascular contents, and dynamic blood flow, such that a shift in this balance predisposes to thrombosis. Although thromboembolic events (TEs) are relatively infrequent in adolescents, the morbidity and mortality associated with TEs can be significant. Over the past 15 years, TEs and inherited and acquired thrombophilic conditions underlying them have become increasingly recognized in teens at risk, with combined hormonal contraception constituting one of the most significant of these risk factors. Therefore, managing gynecologic problems in teens who have thrombophilic conditions can be challenging. It is important to have a clear understanding about safe options available to help address adolescent gynecologic concerns in this setting and to manage situations collaboratively with a hematologist.

Metabolic and cardiovascular impact of oral contraceptives in polycystic ovary syndrome

Chronic anovulation, polycystic ovarian morphology and hyperandrogenism are the diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Metabolic disturbances are more common in PCOS women who are prone to develop metabolic syndrome and to present higher levels of some cardiovascular disease risk marker. Oral contraceptives are widely used in PCOS, but conflicting data have been reported regarding their impact on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism on PCOS women. This paper presents a critical evaluation of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) metabolic effect - carbohydrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism, haemostasis, body weight, arterial pressure and cardiovascular impact - on PCOS women. Because of the paucity of data on the impact of COCs on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters in PCOS patients, most of there commendations are based on studies involving ovulatory women. The use of low-dose COCs is preferable in PCOS, especially among patients with glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and uncomplicated diabetes mellitus. Although reported as a side effect of COCs, marked weight gain has not been confirmed among users. However, when arterial hypertension or elevated risk for thromboembolism is present, progestogen-only hormonal contraceptives should be used instead of COCs. Regarding dyslipidaemia, COCs reduce low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol and elevate high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides, and therefore are not recommended for women with high triglycerides levels. The choice of a COC, which alleviates the PCOS-induced hyperandrogenism without significant negative impact on cardiovascular risk, is one of the greatest challenges faced by gynaecologists nowadays.

Venous thromboembolism in women

Abstract

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies throughout a woman’s life and is associated primarily with underlying hormonal exposure. Alteration in hemostatic mechanisms, including resistance to activated protein C, may explain this altered risk. Initially, development of VTE with the use of contraception in young adulthood may reveal inherited thrombophilia. Pregnancy, and particularly the post-partum period, likely confer the greatest risk of VTE, but the absolute risk is small. Guidelines for prevention of VTE during pregnancy are based on personal or family history of VTE, and known inherited thrombophilia. Use of hormone replacement therapy later in life is associated with increased risk of VTE, and may be safest if given as an estrogen-only preparation to young postmenopausal women for less than 5 years. Universal screening for thrombophilia prior to pregnancy or initiating hormonal therapy is not recommended; however, selected testing in high-risk groups may be warranted. The lack of firm recommendations for the prevention of VTE in women highlights the need for future investigation aimed at identifying high-risk groups and evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic measures.

Different effects of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens on protein S and tissue factor pathway inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Oral contraceptives (OC) containing different types of progestogens induce different sensitivities to activated protein C (APC) measured with the thrombin generation-based APC-resistance test. These differences in APC resistance may be the biological explanation for the differences in thrombotic risk of the various pills. The mechanistic basis of APC resistance observed in OC users is unknown. Our objective was to study the effect of OC on the two main determinants of the APC-resistance test, free protein S and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI).

PATIENTS/METHODS

We measured free protein S and free TFPI in 156 users of various types of OC.

RESULTS

Users of desogestrel-containing OC, known to double the risk of thrombosis compared with levonorgestrel-containing OC, had lower free protein S (24 vs. 33 U dL(-1)) and TFPI free antigen (2.9 vs. 3.6 ng mL(-1)) levels than users of OC containing levonorgestrel. Women using cyproterone acetate-containing OC, known to confer a high thrombotic risk, had the lowest free protein S (19 U dL(-1)) and free TPFI antigen (2.5 ng mL(-1)) levels. Users of OC containing drospirenone had lower free protein S (23 U dL(-1)) and TFPI antigen levels (3.2 ng mL(-1)) than users of levonorgestrel-containing OC. Low free protein S and low free TFPI antigen levels were associated with an increased resistance to APC, an established risk factor for thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study observed that the differences in APC resistance induced by OC containing different progestogens can at least in part be explained by different effects of OC on free protein S and TFPI.

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis after suspension of progesterone-only oral treatment

The intake of steroid hormone contraceptives is a strong and independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Several studies have assessed an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives who are carriers of the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene. Most trials evaluating the thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives are based on combined oral preparations, but only a few focus on progestogen-only oral preparations. Results from such studies are conflicting and globally assess the thrombotic risk, ranging from modest to slightly increased. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship between the C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and the progestogen-based preparations. Herewith we report the case of a 49-year-old woman with a complex genetic thrombosis risk factor who had taken oral progesterone for 15 months without any complication, but then experienced severe left upper extremity deep vein thrombosis 2 months after the drug suspension.

Hormone therapy and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration and progestogens: the ESTHER study

BACKGROUND

Oral estrogen therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in postmenopausal women. Transdermal estrogen may be safer. However, currently available data have limited the ability to investigate the wide variety of types of progestogen.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a multicenter case-control study of VTE among postmenopausal women 45 to 70 years of age between 1999 and 2005 in France. We recruited 271 consecutive cases with a first documented episode of idiopathic VTE (208 hospital cases, 63 outpatient cases) and 610 controls (426 hospital controls, 184 community controls) matched for center, age, and admission date. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, odds ratios (ORs) for VTE in current users of oral and transdermal estrogen compared with nonusers were 4.2 (95% CI, 1.5 to 11.6) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.4 to 2.1), respectively. There was no significant association of VTE with micronized progesterone and pregnane derivatives (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.9 and OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.3, respectively). In contrast, norpregnane derivatives were associated with a 4-fold-increased VTE risk (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 10.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral but not transdermal estrogen is associated with an increased VTE risk. In addition, our data suggest that norpregnane derivatives may be thrombogenic, whereas micronized progesterone and pregnane derivatives appear safe with respect to thrombotic risk. If confirmed, these findings could benefit women in the management of their menopausal symptoms with respect to the VTE risk associated with oral estrogen and use of progestogens.

Complex actions of sex steroids in adipose tissue, the cardiovascular system, and brain: Insights from basic science and clinical studies

Recent publications describing the results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and other studies reporting the impact of hormone therapy on aging women have spurred reexamination of the broad use of estrogens and progestins during the postmenopausal years. Here, we review the complex pharmacology of these hormones, the diverse and sometimes opposite effects that result from the use of different estrogenic and progestinic compounds, given via different delivery routes in different concentrations and treatment sequence, and to women of different ages and health status. We examine our new and growing appreciation of the role of estrogens in the immune system and the inflammatory response, and we pose the concept that estrogen's interface with this system may be at the core of some of the effects on multiple physiological systems, such as the adipose/metabolic system, the cardiovascular system, and the central nervous system. We compare and contrast clinical and basic science studies as we focus on the actions of estrogens in these systems because the untoward effects of hormone therapy reported in the WHI were not expected. The broad interpretation and publicity of the results of the WHI have resulted in a general condemnation of all hormone replacement in postmenopausal women. In fact, careful review of the extensive literature suggests that data resulting from the WHI and other recent studies should be interpreted within the narrow context of the study design. We argue that these results should encourage us to perform new studies that take advantage of a dialogue between basic scientists and clinician scientists to ensure appropriate design, incorporation of current knowledge, and proper interpretation of results. Only then will we have a better understanding of what hormonal compounds should be used in which populations of women and at what stages of menopausal/postmenopausal life.

Comparative effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring delivering a nonandrogenic progestin and continuous ethinyl estradiol and a combined oral contraceptive containing levonorgestrel on hemostasis variables

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effects on hemostasis variables of a contraceptive vaginal ring with those of an oral contraceptive.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-three and 22 healthy premenopausal women were randomized to the contraceptive vaginal ring (150 microg Nestorone and 15 microg ethinyl estradiol) or Stediril 30 during 3 cycles. Analysis of covariance was performed with baseline values as covariate.

RESULTS

The contraceptive vaginal ring changed most hemostasis variables similarly but raised (95% confidence intervals of percent treatment differences) Factor VIIt (28% to 49%), extrinsic activated protein C resistance (14% to 65%), and sex hormone-binding globulin (117% to 210%) and lowered Protein S (-32% to -16%) and the global activated partial thromboplastin time-based activated protein C resistance (-12% to -2%) more than the oral contraceptive.

CONCLUSION

The contraceptive vaginal ring affected some measured hemostasis variables and sex hormone-binding globulin differently from the oral contraceptive, most likely because of difference in androgenicity of the progestins. The results suggest that the contraindications for oral contraceptive use would also apply to the tested contraceptive vaginal ring.

Utility of Thrombin-Generation Assay in the Screening of Factor V G1691A (Leiden) and Prothrombin G20210A Mutations and Protein S Deficiency

Background: The thrombin-generation assay has a variety of clinical uses, including diagnosis of thromboembolism-related disease, and particular profiles are associated with thrombophilic risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of this assay in screening and identifying patients who require specific thrombophilic testing.

Methods: We used a 2-step approach to perform specific thrombophilic testing and thrombin-generation assays on 169 consecutive patients. The first step was to identify particular profiles of thrombin generation corresponding to each type of thrombophilic risk factor and to determine the pertinent variables related to thrombin generation. We then performed ROC curve analysis for each predefined variable to determine the relevant cutoffs for identification of patients in need of further testing (negative predictive value, 100%).

Results: Suggestive profiles were seen in factor V Leiden (n = 49) and prothrombin (n = 12) mutations and in protein S deficiency (n = 12). ROC curves showed that factor V Leiden may be excluded when the difference between lag times obtained in the absence and presence of activated protein C (APC) is &gt;1.5 min and that prothrombin G20210A may also be excluded when the peak thrombin concentration is ≤426 nmol/L. In addition, protein S deficiency may be excluded when the percentage of APC-induced endogenous thrombin potential inhibition is &gt;63%.

Conclusion: The thrombin-generation assay represents a promising tool for screening thrombophilic risk factors, particularly in patients who are carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations and patients with protein S deficiency.

Fatal Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Different Combined Oral Contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare complication of combined oral contraceptive (COC) treatment. This study aims to determine incidences of fatal VTE in relation to the type of COC and the percentage of cases reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (SADRAC). A further aim is to compare the characteristics of reported and not reported cases.

METHODS

This retrospective study is a separate analysis using data from a larger study that included women aged 15-44 years between 1990 and 1999 with VTE coded as the underlying or contributory cause of death in the Swedish Cause of Death Register. COC use within 2 months of the date of symptom onset or death was identified in 28 cases. Sales data were obtained from the National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies. Reported cases were identified in the SADRAC database.

RESULTS

After excluding two cases where the type of COC was unknown, the crude incidences of fatal VTE were 5.1 (95% CI 2.3, 9.6), 8.6 (95% CI 4.3, 15.4) and 9.1 (95% CI 3.3, 19.8) cases per million women per year for levonorgestrel-, desogestrel- and norethisterone-containing COCs, respectively. Age-adjusted incidences were approximately twice as high for desogestrel- and norethisterone-containing COCs compared with levonorgestrel-containing COCs, although differences were not statistically significant. Thirty-six percent of cases were reported. Reporting was positively associated with information in medical records relevant to the VTE diagnosis that the patient was a COC user and was significantly higher in northern Sweden.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study support a higher incidence of fatal VTE with desogestrel-containing COCs than with levonorgestrel-containing COCs.