Challenges in defining type 2M von Willebrand disease: results from a Canadian cohort study

Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Analysis and Classification: A Comprehensive Review and Updates

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric glycoprotein with essential roles in primary hemostasis. Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), due to quantitative and/or qualitative defects of VWF usually experience mucocutaneous bleeding. Based on the laboratory results of VWF antigen, various VWF activities, factor VIII activity, and VWF multimer patterns, VWD can be categorized as type 1, 2, and 3 VWD. VWF multimer analysis by either manual or semi-automated electrophoresis and immunoblotting is a critical part of the laboratory testing to differentiate type 1, type 2 VWD, and subtypes of type 1 or 2 VWD. The multimer distribution patterns can also help to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of VWF synthesis, multimerization, and clearance defects in VWD. This review will cover VWF synthesis, multimerization, secretion, VWF multimer analysis, and VWF multimer interpretation of various types and subtypes of VWD.

Phenotypic and genetic characterizations of the Milan cohort of von Willebrand disease type 2

von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2 is caused by qualitative abnormalities of von Willebrand factor (VWF). This study aimed to determine the genotypic and phenotypic characterizations of a large VWD type 2 cohort from Milan. We included 321 patients (54% female) within 148 unrelated families from 1995 to 2021. Patients were fully characterized using laboratory phenotypic tests, and the genotypic diagnosis was confirmed by target genetic analysis using Sanger sequencing. Patients were diagnosed with type 2A (n = 98; 48 families), 2B (n = 85; 38 families), 2M (n = 112; 50 families), or 2N (n = 26; 12 families). Eighty-two unique VWF variants, including 8 novel variants, were found. The potential pathogenic effect of novel variants was assessed by in silico analysis. Most patients were heterozygous for a single variant (n = 259; 81%), whereas 37 cases (11%) had 2 variants (4 homozygous, 9 in trans, and 24 in cis). Twenty-five patients (8%) had ≥3 variants, mainly as a result of gene conversions. Among the 82 distinct variants identified, 5 different types, including missense (n = 64), gene conversion (n = 10), synonymous (n = 1), deletion (n = 4), and splice (n = 3), were observed. The results from this large cohort showed that VWD type 2 is invariably due to variants that do not prevent the synthesis of the protein, and a vast majority of patients (88%) had missense variants. Given the complexity of type 2 diagnosis and the necessity of performing several phenotypic tests, genetic analysis for patients suspected of having type 2 is beneficial to establish the correct diagnosis.

von Willebrand factor levels in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is associated with significant morbidity as a result of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to prevent and treat these symptoms. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of diagnostic tests using different cutoff values of von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) and platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays in the diagnosis of VWD. We searched Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for eligible studies. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and reported patient-important outcomes when relevant. This review included 21 studies that evaluated VWD diagnosis. The results showed low certainty in the evidence for a net health benefit from reconsidering the diagnosis of VWD vs removing the disease diagnosis in patients with VWF levels that have normalized with age. For the diagnosis of type 1 VWD, VWF sequence variants were detected in 75% to 82% of patients with VWF:Ag < 0.30 IU/mL and in 44% to 60% of patients with VWF:Ag between 0.30 and 0.50 IU/mL. A sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.76-0.97) were observed for a platelet-dependent VWF activity/VWF:Ag ratio < 0.7 in detecting type 2 VWD (moderate certainty in the test accuracy results). VWF:Ag and platelet-dependent activity are continuous variables that are associated with an increase in bleeding risk with decreasing levels. This systematic review shows that using a VWF activity/VWF:Ag ratio < 0.7 vs lower cutoff levels in patients with an abnormal initial VWD screen is more accurate for the diagnosis of type 2 VWD.

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand Disease: Differences in Phenotypic Parameters According to the Affected Domain by Disease-Causing Variants and Assessment of Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) broadly show similar phenotypic parameters, but involve different pathophysiological mechanisms. This report presents the clinical and laboratory profiles of type 2A and type 2M patients genotypically diagnosed at one large center. Higher bleeding score values and a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes were observed in type 2A compared with type 2M, potentially reflective of the absence of large and intermediate von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers in 2A. In type 2A, most of disease-causing variants (DCVs) appeared to be responsible for increased VWF clearance and DCV clustered in the VWF-A1 domain resulted in more severe clinical profiles. In type 2M, DCV in the VWF-A1 domain showed different laboratory patterns, related to either reduced synthesis or shortened VWF survival, and DCV in the VWF-A2 domain showed patterns related mainly to shortened survival. VWF-type 1 collagen binding/Ag (C1B/Ag) showed different patterns according to DCV location: in type 2A VWD, C1B/Ag was much lower when DCVs were located in the VWF-A2 domain. In type 2M with DCV in the VWF-A1domain, C1B/Ag was normal, but with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain, C1B/Ag was low. The higher frequency of major bleeding in VWD 2M patients with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain than that with DCV in the VWF-A1 domain could be a summative effect of abnormal C1B/Ag, on top of the reduced VWF-GPIb binding. In silico modeling suggests that DCV impairing the VWF-A2 domain somehow modulates collagen binding to the VWF-A3 domain. Concomitant normal FVIII:C/Ag and VWFpp/Ag, mainly in type 2M VWD, suggest that other nonidentified pathophysiological mechanisms, neither related to synthesis/retention nor survival of VWF, would be responsible for the presenting phenotype.

ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 11 recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.

Laboratory variability in the diagnosis of type 2 VWD variants

Essentials Patients with von Willebrand disease were enrolled in our study. Type 2 VWD diagnoses were based on original test results. Repeat evaluation resulted in many patients receiving a different type 2 diagnosis. Some genetic variants were particularly likely to move type 2 subcategories. ABSTRACT: Introduction Type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) refers to patients with a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor. Accurate diagnosis of type 2 VWD subtypes can be challenging. Aim of the study To compare the historical diagnosis of type 2 VWD with current laboratory testing. Methods Subjects were enrolled in the Zimmerman Program either because of a preexisting diagnosis of VWD (retrospective cohort) or from evaluation for bleeding symptoms or suspected VWD (prospective cohort). Original diagnosis was assigned by the local center and central diagnosis was based on central laboratory testing. Results Two hundred and seventeen index cases in the retrospective cohort and 35 subjects in the prospective cohort carried a local diagnosis of type 2 VWD (29% and 6% of enrolled index cases, respectively). In the retrospective cohort, the diagnosis was confirmed in 66% of cases with a preexisting diagnosis of 2A, 77% 2B, 54% 2M, and 72% 2N. In the prospective cohort, 31% were confirmed 2A, 60% 2B, 23% 2M, and 100% 2N. Several genetic variants were repeatedly implicated in subjects with changed diagnosis: p.M1304R, p.R1315C, p.R1374C, and p.R1374H. Conclusions Both the prospective and retrospective cohorts demonstrated consistent variation in subjects whose diagnosis changed between 2A, 2B, and 2M. The importance of accurately diagnosing type 2 VWD may be most significant in the 2B subtype given potential concerns with the use of desmopressin in type 2B VWD. Some genetic variants appear in multiple types of VWD, making specific diagnoses challenging.

Diagnostic challenges in von Willebrand disease. Report of two cases with emphasis on multimeric and molecular analysis

Identification of qualitative variants of von Willebrand disease (VWD) can be a diagnostic challenge because of discrepant results obtained in the multiple laboratory tests available for its appropriate classification. We report two cases of infrequent inherited variants of VWD with unclear preliminary results with the test panel available at the time of first consultation and that were finally diagnosed as a VWD type 2A/IID with a c.8318 G > C, p.Cys2773Ser mutation and a VWD type 2M with c.4225 T > G, p.Val1409Phe mutation, respectively. The description of these two cases highlights that despite the limited diagnostic panel for the evaluation of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) functionality, the multimeric analysis and genetic family studies were fundamental tools to achieve the final diagnosis.

Evaluation of a semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers

BACKGROUND

The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non-standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi-automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available.

OBJECTIVES

This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in-house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD.

RESULTS

Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in-house method.

CONCLUSIONS

5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis.

Von Willebrand factor and the aortic valve: Concepts that are important in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era

Since the approval of the first transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) device in 2011, this technology has undergone substantial enhancements and exponential growth. However, valve thrombosis and residual paravalvular leaks (PVL) are among the challenges that require further investigation. Recently, monitoring von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers has emerged as a tool to help evaluate the severity of PVL after TAVR. Following TAVR, vWF large multimers recovery have been documented. The role of large vWF multimers recovery and their interactions with platelets, and the endothelium have not been entirely elucidated. In this review, we discuss vWF synthesis and its role in aortic stenosis. We further provide an overview of the studies that investigated changes affecting vWF multimers following TAVR and the role of HMW vWF multimers monitoring in the determination of PVL severity. We also offer potential future directions for what will be fertile ground for research in this field.

The elusive and heterogeneous pattern of type 2M von Willebrand disease: A diagnostic challenge

Type 2M is a very heterogeneous form of von Willebrand disease (VWD) associated with impaired platelet and von Willebrand factor (VWF) interactions not due to a lack of large VWF multimers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate type 2M heterogeneity and to establish the most appropriate diagnostic flowchart.

METHODS

Hemostatic and genetic VWF analyses were performed in 14 type 2M VWD patients carrying the p.G1324S, p.R1374H, p.R1374C, p.A1344_A1350del, or p.F1293L mutations.

RESULTS

PFA-100 was always significantly prolonged, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) and VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) greatly reduced or absent. Plasma VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) was reduced except in the p.G1324S patient, while platelet VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in the p.R1374C patients. The ratio of collagen binding (VWF:CB) to VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in patients carrying the p.R1374H and p.A1344_A1350del mutations, whose large VWF multimers were slightly reduced. Multimer patterns were normal or lacking in large oligomers, or with larger than normal VWF components.

CONCLUSIONS

Only PFA100, RIPA and VWF:RCo were always abnormal. We thus propose a minimal diagnostic test battery: RIPA (demonstrating the defective VWF-platelet interaction), VWF:Ag (exploring VWF synthesis), and VWF:CB and its ratio (to explore multimer patterns). Other tests would only serve for confirmation, if necessary.

Type 2M Von Willebrand Disease: A Case Report

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and is divided into three types, namely type 1, type 2 (2A, 2B, 2M, 2N), and type 3. We report a case of a 24-year-old Caucasian woman with a rare variety of type 2M VWD. Her von Willebrand factor versus antigen ratio was 0.44 (normal ratio is greater than 0.7) . She was asymptomatic and hence not treated but followed up regularly. VWD is not life-threatening when treated timely.

Genetic Variation in the von Willebrand Factor Gene in Swedish von Willebrand Disease Patients

von Willebrand factor (VWF) level and function are influenced by genetic variation in VWF and several other genes in von Willebrand disease type 1 (VWD1) patients. This study comprehensively screened for VWF variants and investigated the presence of ABO genotypes and common and rare VWF variants in Swedish VWD1 patients. The VWF gene was resequenced using Ion Torrent and Sanger sequencing in 126 index cases historically diagnosed with VWD. Exon 7 of the ABO gene was resequenced using Sanger sequencing. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis was used to investigate for copy number variants. Genotyping of 98 single nucleotide variants allowed allele frequency comparisons with public databases. Seven VWD2 mutations and 36 candidate VWD1 mutations (5 deletions, 4 nonsense, 21 missense, 1 splice, and 5 synonymous mutations) were identified. Nine mutations were found in more than one family and nine VWD1 index cases carried more than one candidate mutation. The T-allele of rs1063857 (c.2385T > C, p.Y795 = ) and blood group O were both frequent findings and contributed to disease in the Swedish VWD1 population. VWD2 mutations were found in 20 and candidate VWD1 mutations in 51 index cases out of 106 (48%). VWF mutations, a VWF haplotype, and blood group O all contributed to explain disease in Swedish VWD1 patients.

Clinical and laboratory phenotype variability in type 2M von Willebrand disease

Essentials The pathophysiology of type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is poorly understood. Sequence variations in type 2M VWD subjects were characterized. A high degree of clinical and laboratory variability exists within type 2M VWD variants. Some type 2M variants may share features of type 2A VWD.

SUMMARY

Background von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric coagulation factor that tethers platelets to injured subendothelium. Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a qualitative defect in VWF with preserved multimer distribution. Objectives Through the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology for VWD, five VWF sequence variations were studied in subjects diagnosed with type 2M VWD. Methods Bleeding phenotype was assessed using the ISTH bleeding assessment tool. Full-length VWF gene sequencing was performed for each subject. Each variant was placed into a recombinant VWF vector using site-directed mutagenesis and expressed in HEK293T cells as homozygous or heterozygous VWF. Variant expression, collagen binding and platelet GPIbα binding were studied through ELISA assays. Multimer analysis was performed by gel electrophoresis. Results Bleeding scores were elevated for all subjects except for the p.P1162L and p.R1374C variants. Although all had reduced VWF ristocetin cofactor activity/VWF antigen ratios on plasma testing, recombinant VWF did not show a classic type 2M phenotype for any of the five variants. Homozygous expression of variants p.D1283Y, p.R1349C, p.R1374C and p.I1453N was consistent with type 2A VWD, although all had normal expression as heterozygous recombinant VWF. Variant p.P1162L had normal VWF expression and function, consistent with the lack of bleeding symptoms. Conclusions Although originally classified as type 2M VWD, these homozygous recombinant VWF variants do not fulfill complete 2M VWD diagnostic criteria. A better classification schema and improved testing for putative type 2M variants is needed in order to effectively diagnose and treat affected patients.

von Willebrand Disease: A Concise Review and Update for the Practicing Physician

von Willebrand disease (vWD) is the most common inherited disorder of hemostasis and comprises a spectrum of heterogeneous subtypes. Significant advances have been made in understanding von Willebrand factor ( vWF) gene mutations, resultant physiologic deficits in the vWF peptide, and their correlation to clinical presentation. Diagnostic tests for this disorder are complex, and interpretation requires a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology by the practicing physician. The objective of this review is to summarize our current understanding of pathophysiology, laboratory investigations, and evolving treatment paradigm of vWD with the availability of recombinant von Willebrand factor.

Variable bleeding phenotype in an Amish pedigree with von Willebrand disease

Through a cross-sectional study design, the bleeding phenotype in the Amish in Indiana (IN) and Wisconsin (WI) was described using two different bleeding scores. von Willebrand factor (VWF) testing was performed and bleeding questionnaires from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and European MCMDM-1 (Tosetto bleeding score (BS)) were administered to the IN and WI cohort respectively. Seven hundred and seventy nine subjects were recruited, 17% were diagnosed with VWD based on Ristocetin cofactor, VWF:RCo < 30 IU/dl. Majority of the affected (AF), 67%, were tested and had a common mutation c.4120 C > T. The WI AF were much younger at a mean age 15 years vs 26 years in IN AF cohort. The AF subjects had a median VWF:RCo of 13IU/dl with a statistically significant higher median BS 1 versus 0 in the WI AF vs WI Unaffected (UA), 2 vs 1 in the IN AF vs IN UA, P < 0.01. Adults had a higher median BS compared to children in the WI and IN cohort, 2 vs 1 and 3 vs 1 respectively (P < 0.05) but there was no statistically significant difference in the BS between males and females in either cohort. The common symptoms reported were epistaxis and gingival oozing. BS ≥ 3 and BS ≥ 4 were observed in 46% of AF IN and 16.6% of AF WI, respectively. There was significant variability in the bleeding phenotype, with an overall low BS in the affected Amish with VWD, despite a unifying mutation. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E431-E435, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Using genetic diagnostics in hemophilia and von Willebrand disease

Most bleeding disorders encountered in clinical practice will be diagnosed, at least initially, by phenotypic assays. However, since the characterization of the genes that encode coagulation factors in the 1980s, significant progress has been made in translating this knowledge for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. For hemophilia A and B, molecular genetic testing to determine carrier status, prenatal diagnosis, and likelihood of inhibitor development or anaphylaxis to infused coagulation factor concentrates is an established component of comprehensive clinical management. In contrast, although significant recent advances in our understanding of the molecular genetic basis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) have allowed for the development of rational approaches to genetic diagnostics, questions remain about this complex genetic disorder and how to incorporate emerging knowledge into diagnostic strategies. This article will review the state-of-the-art for molecular diagnostics for both hemophilia and VWD.

Translational medicine advances in von Willebrand disease

Following the recognition of von Willebrand disease (VWD) in 1926 and the cloning of the gene for von Willebrand factor (VWF) in 1985, significant advances have been made in our fundamental knowledge of both the disease and the protein. Some of this new knowledge has also begun to impact the clinical management of VWD. First, the progressive increase in our understanding of the molecular genetic basis of VWD has resulted in rational applications of molecular testing to complement the current range of phenotypic tests for VWD. These molecular genetic strategies are most effectively directed at the prenatal diagnosis of type 3 VWD and confirmatory testing for types 2B and 2N disease. In contrast, the use of molecular testing to clarify the diagnosis of type 1 VWD is of marginal benefit, at best. In terms of VWD therapies, a new recombinant VWF concentrate has recently completed successful clinical trials and is now awaiting more widespread application. There have even been some preclinical successes with VWF gene transfer although the clinical rationale for this therapeutic strategy needs careful consideration. Much more remains to be learnt about the biology of VWF and further translational advances for the enhancement of VWD care will inevitably be realized.

Variability in platelet- and collagen-binding defects in type 2M von Willebrand disease

Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes qualitative defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF) function, with normal multimer distribution but a defect in VWF activity with respect to platelet or collagen binding. We characterized novel VWF gene mutations found in type 2M VWD subjects enrolled in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD. Subjects were enrolled based on a pre-existing diagnosis of type 2M VWD. Testing included full-length gene sequencing, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), VWF collagen binding and multimer distribution. Recombinant VWF variants were synthesized using site-directed mutagenesis and expressed in HEK293T cells. Platelet binding was measured by flow cytometry with fixed platelets and ELISA with recombinant glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα). Four novel VWF A1 domain mutations were found in individuals with type 2M VWD: S1358N, S1387I, S1394F and Q1402P. All subjects had a history of bleeding, VWF:RCo < 40 IU dL(-1) , VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios <0.6 and normal multimer distribution. No defect in expression, secretion, or multimerization was found for any of the mutations. All showed decreased binding to intact platelets, and decreased or absent binding to a mutant GPIbα construct with spontaneous VWF binding. 1387I had decreased binding to all collagen types tested. 1402P had reduced binding exclusively to type VI collagen. Type 2M VWD is a heterogeneous category comprised of both collagen- and platelet-binding defects. Understanding the precise defect for each mutation may ultimately lead to better diagnosis and treatment.

The molecular characterization of von Willebrand disease: good in parts

Since the cloning of the gene that encodes von Willebrand factor (VWF), 27 years ago, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular basis of the most common inherited bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease (VWD). The molecular pathology of this condition represents a range of genetic mechanisms, some of which are now very well characterized, and others that are still under investigation. In general, our knowledge of the molecular basis of type 2 and 3 VWD is now well advanced, and in some instances this information is being used to enhance clinical management. In contrast, our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of the most common form of VWD, type 1 disease, is still at an early stage, with preliminary evidence that this phenotype involves a complex interplay between environmental factors and the influence of genetic variability both within and outside of the VWF locus.

The molecular genetics of von Willebrand disease

Quantitative and/or qualitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (vWF) is associated with the most common inherited bleeding disease von Willebrand disease (vWD). vWD is a complex disease with clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Incomplete penetrance and variable expression due to genetic and environmental factors contribute to its complexity. vWD also has a complex molecular pathogenesis. Some vWF gene mutations are associated with the affected vWF biosynthesis and multimerization, whereas others are associated with increased clearance and functional impairment. Moreover, in addition to a particular mutation, type O blood may result in the more severe phenotype. The present review aimed to provide a summary of the current literature on the molecular genetics of vWD.

Conflict of interest:None declared.

Mutation distribution in the von Willebrand factor gene related to the different von Willebrand disease (VWD) types in a cohort of VWD patients

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative or qualitative defects of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is classified into three types--type 1 (partial quantitative deficiencies), type 2 (qualitative defects) and type 3 (complete deficiency of VWF). In this study we explored genotype and phenotype characteristics of patients with VWD with the aim of dissecting the distribution of mutations in different types of VWD. One hundred fourteen patients belonging to 78 families diagnosed to have VWD were studied. Mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing of the VWF . Large deletions were investigated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis. The impact of novel candidate missense mutations and potential splice site mutations was predicted by in silico assessments. We identified mutations in 66 index patients (IPs) (84.6%). Mutation detection rate was 68%, 94% and 94% for VWD type 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In total, 68 different putative mutations were detected comprising 37 missense mutations (54.4%), 10 small deletions (14.7%), two small insertions (2.9%), seven nonsense mutations (10.3%), five splice-site mutations (7.4%), six large deletions (8.8%) and one silent mutation (1.5%). Twenty-six of these mutations were novel. Furthermore, in type 1 and type 2 VWD, the majority of identified mutations (74% vs. 88.1%) were missense substitutions while mutations in type 3 VWD mostly caused null alleles (82%). Genotyping in VWD is a helpful tool to further elucidate the pathogenesis of VWD and to establish the relationship between genotype and phenotype.

von Willebrand disease: clinical and laboratory lessons learned from the large von Willebrand disease studies

During the past 25 years, our knowledge concerning the pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, and treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) has increased significantly. Following the immunological differentiation of factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the 1970s and the cloning of the FVIII and VWF genes in the mid-1980s, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of this, the most common inherited bleeding disorder. We now recognize that VWD represents a range of genetic diseases all with the clinical endpoint of increased mucocutaneous bleeding. The molecular pathology of Type 2 and 3 VWD is now comprehensively documented and involves rare sequence variants at the VWF locus. In contrast, the genetic causation of Type 1 disease remains incompletely defined and in many cases appears to involve genetic determinants in addition to or instead of VWF. The diagnostic triad of a personal history of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding, laboratory tests for VWF that are consistent with VWD, and a family history of the condition remain the keystone to VWD identification. In the laboratory, measurement of VWF antigen and function continue to be the most important diagnostic studies, and while our understanding of the molecular genetic pathology of VWD has advanced considerably in the past decade, genetic testing as a component of diagnosis is limited to certain distinct subtypes of the disorder. Treatment of VWD has been relatively unchanged for the past decade and continues to involve either stimulation of the release of intrinsic VWF with desmopressin or the infusion of VWF concentrates.

Different bleeding risk in type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease: a 2-year prospective study in 107 patients

BACKGROUND

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD2A and VWD2M) are characterized by the presence of a dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) and a variable bleeding tendency. So far, a head-to-head comparison of the clinical history and bleeding risk between VWD2A and VWD2M has never been provided in a prospective manner.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We assessed the bleeding incidence rate and clinical characteristics in two cohorts of 17 families (46 patients) with VWD2A and 15 families (61 patients) with VWD2M prospectively followed-up for 24 months. VWF gene mutations were characterized in all of them.

RESULTS

Mean bleeding score (BS) and VWF antigen at enrollment were significantly higher in VWD2A patients (P = 0.007). No correlation between VWF activity or factor VIII levels and the severity of BS was observed. The incidence rate of spontaneous bleeding requiring treatment was 107/100 patient-years (95% CI, 88.3-131) in VWD2A compared with 40/100 patient-years (95% CI, 30-53) in VWD2M (P < 0.001). The risk of bleeding was significantly higher in patients with BS ≥ 10 at enrollment compared with those with BS 0-2. Furthermore, 54 episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 17/46 (36.9%) VWD2A patients and seven in 2/61 (3.3%) VWD2M patients (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Bleeding tendency in VWD2A is greater than that of VWD2M, is not explained by factor VIII or VWF levels and is mainly due to an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding.

von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease is a common inherited bleeding disorder characterized by excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Characteristic bleeding symptoms include epistaxis, easy bruising, oral cavity bleeding, menorrhagia, bleeding after dental extraction, surgery, and/or childbirth, and in severe cases, bleeding into joints and soft tissues. There are three subtypes: types 1 and 3 represent quantitative variants and type 2 is a group of four qualitative variants: (1) type 2A-characterized by defective von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet adhesion because of decreased high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor multimers, (2) type 2B-caused by pathologically increased von Willebrand factor-platelet interactions, (3) type 2M-caused by decreased von Willebrand factor-platelet interactions not based on the loss of high-molecular-weight multimers, and (4) type 2N-characterized by reduced binding of von Willebrand factor to factor VIII. The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease requires specialized assays of von Willebrand factor and/or molecular genetic testing of von Willebrand factor. Severe bleeding episodes can be prevented or controlled with intravenous infusions of virally inactivated plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates containing both von Willebrand factor and factor VIII. Depending on the von Willebrand disease type, mild bleeding episodes usually respond to intravenous or subcutaneous treatment with desmopressin, a vasopressin analog. Other treatments that can reduce symptoms include fibrinolytic inhibitors and hormones for menorrhagia.

von Willebrand factor: the complex molecular genetics of a multidomain and multifunctional protein

von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder in humans, is characterised by a prolonged bleeding time due to quantitative and/or functional deficits of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a huge multimeric protein. Given the large size and complexity of the protein, the many functions of VWF, for example, binding to collagen, to platelet GPIb, and to FVIII, the localisation of these binding sites in different VWF domains, as well as the dependence on a high molecular weight multimer structure for proper function, VWF is prone to quantitative and very heterogeneous structural and functional defects. Comprehensive clinical and laboratory phenotypic description of patients with VWD in correlation to the genotype has considerably increased our knowledge on this disorder and the physiology and pathophysiology of VWF. This article focuses on the phenotype/genotype relationship in VWD and the context of VWD types and subtypes with particular VWF domains.

Gain-of-function GPIb ELISA assay for VWF activity in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, but diagnosis is sometimes challenging because of issues with the current von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), used for diagnosis. We evaluated 113 healthy controls and 164 VWD subjects enrolled in the T.S. Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD for VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay of VWF-glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) interactions using a gain-of-function GPIb construct (tGPIbα(235Y;239V)) as a receptor to bind its ligand VWF in an assay independent of ristocetin (VWF:IbCo ELISA). Healthy controls, type 1, 2A, 2M, and 2N subjects had VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios similar to the ratio obtained with VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag. Type 2B VWD subjects, however, had elevated VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag ratios. Type 3 VWD subjects had undetectable (< 1.6 U/dL) VWF:IbCo ELISA values. As previously reported, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio was decreased with a common A1 domain polymorphism, D1472H, as was direct binding to ristocetin for a 1472H A1 loop construct. The VWF:IbCo ELISA, however, was not affected by D1472H. The VWF:IbCo ELISA may be useful in testing VWF binding to GPIb, discrimination of type 2 variants, and in the diagnosis of VWD as it avoids some of the pitfalls of VWF:RCo assays.

The genetic basis of von Willebrand disease

The common autosomally inherited mucocutaneous bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease (VWD) results from quantitative or qualitative defects in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF). Mutation can affect VWF quantity or its functions mediating platelet adhesion and aggregation at sites of vascular damage and carrying pro-coagulant factor VIII (FVIII). Phenotype and genotype analysis in patients with the three VWD types has aided understanding of VWF structure and function. Investigation of patients with specific disease types has identified mutations in up to 70% of type 1 and 100% of type 3 VWD cases. Missense mutations predominate in type 1 VWD and act through mechanisms including rapid clearance and intracellular retention. Many mutations are incompletely penetrant and attributing pathogenicity is challenging. Other factors including blood group O contribute to low VWF level. Missense mutations affecting platelet- or FVIII-binding through a number of mechanisms are responsible for the four type 2 subtypes; 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N. In contrast, mutations resulting in a lack of VWF expression predominate in recessive type 3 VWD. This review explores the genetic basis of each VWD type, relating mutations identified to disease mechanism. Additionally, utility of genetic analysis within the different disease types is explored.

Limitations of the ristocetin cofactor assay in measurement of von Willebrand factor function

BACKGROUND

Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor (VWF) and diagnosed by a disproportionate decrease in VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) as compared with VWF antigen (VWF:Ag).

OBJECTIVE

We report here on the spurious diagnosis of VWD in a patient with a sequence variation in the ristocetin-binding domain of VWF.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The index case had a VWF:RCo of 11 IU dL(-1), with VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio of 0.09. DNA sequencing revealed a novel P1467S mutation in a known ristocetin-binding region of the A1 domain. Because of the discrepancy between the laboratory findings, consistent with type 2M VWD, and the patient's lack of bleeding symptoms, further studies were performed to determine whether this mutation affected VWF function or merely reduced its ability to interact with ristocetin.

RESULTS

Studies with recombinant VWF showed normal platelet binding with botrocetin, but a significant decrease in binding in response to ristocetin. Ristocetin-induced binding to recombinant GPIb was also absent, but normal binding was seen when a gain-of-function GPIb construct was used in the absence of ristocetin. VWF function under shear stress was normal when analyzed with a cone and plate(let) analyzer.

CONCLUSIONS

The decreased VWF:RCo seen with the P1467S sequence variation likely represents an artifact as a result of the use of ristocetin to measure VWF activity. The normal VWF function in other assays correlates with the lack of hemorrhagic symptoms, and suggests the need for more physiologically relevant assays of VWF function.

Generation and validation of the Condensed MCMDM-1VWD Bleeding Questionnaire for von Willebrand disease

BACKGROUND

Given the challenges involved in obtaining accurate bleeding histories, attempts at standardization have occurred and the value of quantifying hemorrhagic symptoms has been recognized.

PATIENTS/METHODS

An extensive validated bleeding questionnaire (MCMDM-1VWD) was condensed by eliminating all details that did not directly affect the bleeding score (BS) and the correlation between the two versions was tested. Additionally, the diagnostic utility of the condensed version was prospectively tested.

RESULTS

Data on 259 individuals who were administered the questionnaire are presented here; 217 being prospectively investigated for von Willebrand disease (VWD) (group 1) and 42 previously known to have type 1, 2 or 3 VWD (group 2). Of the 217 prospectively investigated, 35 had positive BS (> or =4) and 182 had negative scores. Seven individuals (all with positive BS) had laboratory results consistent with type 1 VWD. This results in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. The positive predictive value is 0.20 and the negative predictive value is 1. The correlation between the full MCMDM-1VWD and condensed versions is excellent (Spearman's 0.97, P < 0.001, linear regression r(2) = 96.4). Inter-observer reliability for the condensed version is reasonable (Spearman's 0.72, P < 0.001 and intra-class correlation coefficient 0.805, P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in BS between subtypes of VWD, with type 3 >> type 2 >> type 1 VWD (anova P < 0.001). There is a strong inverse relationship between VWF:Ag level and BS (Spearman's -0.411, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Condensed MCMDM-1VWD Bleeding Questionnaire is an efficient, effective tool in the evaluation of patients for VWD.

Type 1 von Willebrand disease: application of emerging data to clinical practice

There has been much recent data published on type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) predominantly from three multi-centre cohort studies. These data have influenced a revision of the classification of type 1 VWD and have important implications for the management of this disorder. Patients with low von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels tend to have VWF mutations and VWD is transmitted predictably within families. In patients with VWF levels close to the lower end of the normal range, candidate mutations are found less often, ABO blood group is a more important factor and the disease has variable heritability within families. The importance of bleeding symptoms, in addition to VWF levels, in the diagnosis of type 1 VWD has been highlighted.

Biologic response to subcutaneous and intranasal therapy with desmopressin in a large Amish kindred with Type 2M von Willebrand disease

The aim of this study was to characterize the adequacy and longevity of biological response to desmopressin (DDAVP) in a large Amish kindred of Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) possessing C-to-T transition at nucleotide 4120 in exon 28 of A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene. Response to both intranasal (Stimate) and subcutaneous DDAVP administration was assessed. Rise in ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) > or = 40% at 90-min post-Stimate and 1-2 h after subcutaneous DDAVP was defined as initial response; response longevity was assessed only after subcutaneous dosing by measuring VWF:RCo levels at time-points 1, 2, 4 and 6 h. Eleven patients (five males, six females; age range: 20-56 years) participated in intranasal and 9/11 (four males, five females) in subcutaneous testing. Baseline haemostatic profiles included: VWF:RCo < 15%, VWF:Ag < 40% and normal VWF multimers. Initial response was comparable by both intranasal (6/11; 54.5%) and subcutaneous (4/9; 44%) routes; sustained response (VWF:RCo > 40% for 2 h) was observed in only one in nine (11%) patients tested. Median VWF:RCo peak levels after intranasal (40%) and subcutaneous (39%) routes were equivalent. Peak VWF:Ag levels were significantly higher after subcutaneous than intranasal DDAVP (94% vs. 54%; P = 0.03). Area under the curve for VWF:RCo was significantly decreased (170 microg h mL(-1)) compared with VWF:Ag (471 microg h mL(-1)) and FVIII:C (624.60 microg h mL(-1)). This study suggests that in this population: (i) intra-individual DDAVP response is consistent with subcutaneous and intranasal administration; and (ii) extending DDAVP challenge test up to at least 6 h is required to characterize adequacy and longevity of biologic response prior to using DDAVP as a sole haemostatic intervention.