The GPIb-thrombin pathway: evidence for a novel role of fibrin in platelet aggregation

Platelet binding to polymerizing fibrin is avidity driven and requires activated αIIbβ3 but not fibrin cross-linking

Platelet interaction with polymerizing fibrin is avidity driven and requires activated αIIbβ3 but not fibrin cross-linking.

The mechanism by which αIIbβ3 interacts with polymerizing fibrin differs subtly from the interaction of αIIbβ3 with fibrinogen.

The molecular basis of platelet-fibrin interactions remains poorly understood despite the predominance of fibrin in thrombi. We have studied the interaction of platelets with polymerizing fibrin by adding thrombin to washed platelets in the presence of the peptide RGDW, which inhibits the initial platelet aggregation mediated by fibrinogen binding to αIIbβ3 but leaves intact a delayed increase in light transmission (delayed wave; DW) as platelets interact with the polymerizing fibrin. The DW was absent in platelets from a patient with Glanzmann thrombasthenia, indicating a requirement for αIIbβ3. The DW required αIIbb3 activation and it was inhibited by the αIIbβ3 antagonists eptifibatide and the monoclonal antibody (mAb) 7E3, but only at much higher concentrations than needed to inhibit platelet aggregation initiated by a thrombin receptor activating peptide (T6). Surface plasmon resonance and scanning electron microscopy studies both supported fibrin having greater avidity for αIIbβ3 than fibrinogen rather than greater affinity, consistent with fibrin’s multivalency. mAb 10E5, a potent inhibitor of T6-induced platelet aggregation, did not inhibit the DW, suggesting that fibrin differs from fibrinogen in its mechanism of binding. Inhibition of factor XIII–mediated fibrin cross-linking by >95% reduced the DW by only 32%. Clot retraction showed a pattern of inhibition similar to that of the DW. We conclude that activated αIIbβ3 is the primary mediator of platelet-fibrin interactions leading to clot retraction, and that the interaction is avidity driven, does not require fibrin cross-linking, and is mediated by a mechanism that differs subtly from that of the interaction of αIIbβ3 with fibrinogen.

Dominant role of αIIbβ3 in platelet interactions with cross-linked fibrin fragment D-dimer

Although much is known about the interaction of fibrinogen with αIIbβ3, much less is known about the interaction of platelets with cross-linked fibrin. Fibrinogen residue Lys406 plays a vital role in the interaction of fibrinogen with αIIbβ3, but because it participates in fibrin cross-linking, it is not available for interacting with αIIbβ3. We studied the adhesion of platelets and HEK cells expressing normal and constitutively active αIIbβ3 to both immobilized fibrinogen and D-dimer, a proteolytic fragment of cross-linked fibrin, as well as platelet-mediated clot retraction. Nonactivated platelets and HEK cells expressing normal αIIbβ3 adhered to fibrinogen but not D-dimer, whereas activated platelets as well as HEK cells expressing activated αIIbβ3 both bound to D-dimer. Small-molecule antagonists of the αIIbβ3 RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) binding pocket inhibited adhesion to D-dimer, and an Asp119Ala mutation that disrupts the β3 metal ion-dependent adhesion site inhibited αIIbβ3-mediated adhesion to D-dimer. D-dimer and a polyclonal antibody against D-dimer inhibited clot retraction. The monoclonal antibody (mAb) 10E5, directed at αIIb and a potent inhibitor of platelet interactions with fibrinogen, did not inhibit the interaction of activated platelets with D-dimer or clot retraction, whereas the mAb 7E3, directed at β3, inhibited both phenomena. We conclude that activated, but not nonactivated, αIIbβ3 mediates interactions between platelets and D-dimer, and by extrapolation, to cross-linked fibrin. Although the interaction of αIIbβ3 with D-dimer differs from that with fibrinogen, it probably involves contributions from regions on β3 that are close to, or that are affected by, changes in the RGD binding pocket.

Inhibition of gamma-thrombin-induced human platelet aggregation by histone H1subtypes and H1.3 fragments

Human platelets are differentially activated by varying concentrations of alpha-thrombin or by beta- and gamma-thrombin via three thrombin receptors, PAR-1, PAR-4 and GPIbalpha.It is likely that the development of a normal or abnormal hemostatic event in humans is dictated, in part, by the selective activation of these receptors. The ability to differentially inhibit these thrombin receptors could, therefore, have clinical significance. We have previously demonstrated that histone H1 selectively inhibits the PAR-4 receptor. In the current study we investigated whether five subtypes of the H1 molecule or fragments of the H1.3 subtype differentially inhibited the PAR-4 receptor. PAR-4 inhibition by all H1 subtypes was saturated at 1 uM with no statistical difference observed with the five H1 subtypes tested. Of the five fragments generated from the H1.3 molecule only one had significant inhibitory activity against PAR-4. The C-terminal fragment, N.1, generated by the proteolysis of the parent molecule by Asp-N endoproteinase (Aeromonas proteolytica) at the single aspartate residue, showed the same level of PAR-4 inhibition as the intact H1.3 at 1 uM concentrations. Removal of two N-terminal amino acids (Asp-Val as determined by MALDI analysis) from the N.1 fragment further enhanced its inhibitory activity. These studies may help to develop specific drugs to differentially inhibit the platelet thrombin receptors.

Thrombin induces GPIb-IX-mediated fibrin binding to alphaIIbbeta3 in a reconstituted Chinese hamster ovary cell model

BACKGROUND

The interaction of thrombin with platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V has been recently suggested to induce fibrin-dependent platelet aggregation associated with signaling events. The approaches used to avoid the protease-activated receptor (PAR) thrombin receptors in platelets have provided controversial conclusions regarding the precise mechanism and molecules involved in the response.

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we developed a cellular model to investigate the functional consequences following the binding of thrombin to GPIb-IX.

METHODS

We used Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing human alpha(IIb)beta(3) and/or GPIb-IX complexes (CHO-alpha(IIb)beta(3)-IbIX cells) to analyze the effect of thrombin on the binding of polymerizing fibrin by using fluorescein isothiocyanate-fibrinogen as precursor.

RESULTS

Thrombin induces, in a dose-dependent manner, the binding of polymerizing fibrin to CHO-alpha(IIb)beta(3)-IbIX cells. This response is not observed in cells expressing only one of the receptors, and it can be blocked by monoclonal antibodies against alpha(IIb)beta(3) and GPIbalpha. We show that the reaction is not due to simple cell trapping by the fibrin clot, and provide data supporting a role of a signaling pathway in which the 14-3-3zeta adaptor and calcium-calmodulin-dependent events are involved.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data support a significant role of GPIb-IX and alpha(IIb)beta(3) receptors in an alternative fibrin-mediated pathway of platelet activation induced by thrombin.

Chemically modified thrombin and anhydrothrombin that differentiate macromolecular substrates of thrombin

BACKGROUND

Thrombin is a primary inducer of thrombus formation by activations of coagulation cascade and platelet aggregation. Hitherto, several types of thrombin inhibitors have been developed for therapeutic purpose.

OBJECTIVES

We prepared modified thrombin (M-thrombin) and modified anhydrothrombin (M-anhydrothrombin) by chemical modification of carboxyl groups of thrombin and anhydrothrombin, respectively, to present a new strategy for a potent antiplatelet-anticoagulant agent and new tools for investigation of thrombin functions.

RESULTS

M-anhydrothrombin retained high affinity for factor VIII (FVIII), but demonstrated lower affinity than anhydrothrombin for fibrinogen and factor V (FV). Both M-anhydrothrombin and anhydrothrombin prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) without affecting prothrombin time, and M-anhydrothrombin prolonged APTT much more than anhydrothrombin. M-anhydrothrombin also retained affinity for the recombinant extracellular domain peptide of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1). M-thrombin exhibited marginal clotting activity (4% of thrombin), but induced platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma without forming a fibrin clot, which was completely suppressed by anti-PAR1 antibody (ATAP2) and by M-anhydrothrombin, but not by anhydrothrombin. These results indicate that M-thrombin induced platelet aggregation through the activation of PAR1, and M-anhydrothrombin inhibited this process completely. In contrast, neither M-anhydrothrombin nor anhydrothrombin apparently inhibited thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. Only in the presence of the Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro (GPRP) peptide that inhibits polymerization of fibrin, M-anhydrothrombin completely inhibited thrombin-induced platelet aggregation.

CONCLUSION

M-thrombin is PAR1-specific and M-anhydrothrombin is FVIII- and PAR1-specific derivatives, and thereby, are new tools as specific agonist and antagonist, respectively, of PAR1. Furthermore, M-anhydrothrombin may be an attractive model for development of a potent anticoagulant-antiplatelet agent.