Evidence of low-grade intravascular coagulation in patients with transvenous pacemakers

Acute Subclavian or Axillary Vein Occlusion During Biventricular Pacemaker Implantation

During biventricular pacemaker implantation, multiple punctures of the subclavian vein were performed and venous occlusion was apparent during the procedure, which in one case was stopped before lead insertion and in the other patient new access has to be forced through the occlusion by removing one of the already implanted leads. For implanting physicians, it is important to know that acute venous occlusion may occur during lead implantation.

Comparative thrombogenicity of pacemaker leads

To evaluate the thrombogenicity of transvenous silicone and polyurethane pacemaker leads, 9 of 12 anesthetized Yorkshire pigs (27-32 kg) were implanted with silicone (n = 5) or polyurethane (n = 4) pacemaker leads via a femoral vein. The remaining three pigs served as controls. All 12 pigs were injected with autologous indium-111 labeled platelets (300-420 muCi) 24 hours before anesthesia induction. The pigs were monitored for 3 hours under a gamma camera. Radioactivity in blood and lead segments was measured with a gamma counter. Platelet deposits were denser on silicone leads (441.58 +/- 915.0 to 2.19 +/- 2.07) than on polyurethane leads (1.21 +/- 1.33 to 0.27 +/- 0.14) (P > 0.05). Denser platelet deposits were detected at the tip of all leads. Density of platelet deposits declined from tip to distal segments in silicone leads. The percentage of injected platelet radioactivity in the lungs of pigs with either silastic leads (12.9 +/- 2.3%) of polyurethane leads (10.1 +/- 2.2%) was higher than in the controls (4.6 +/- 0.5%) (P < 0.05). This difference indicates thrombus formation and embolization in the lungs early after lead implantation. Thrombogenicity of polyurethane leads may be lower than that of silicone leads.