High and low strength nonsynchronized shocks given during canine ventricular tachycardia

Successful external cardioversion for ventricular tachycardia using 2 Joules

We present a patient with recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia following myocardial infarction, refractory to drug therapy. He has been reluctant to have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, but responds to very low energy transthoracic direct current cardioversion administered via external pacing electrodes under sedation. The use of very low energies may avoid shock-induced myocardial damage in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

Ventricular fibrillation induction using nonsynchronized low energy external shock during rapid ventricular pacing: method of induction when fibrillation mode of ICD fails

Third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are frequently implanted with nonthoracotomy systems and provide noninvasive methods for electrical stimulation and ventricular fibrillation induction. These modalities facilitate postoperative testing of the ICD. Rapid right ventricular burst pacing via the defibrillator is commonly used for initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, with the available third-generation devices, ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction may be impossible in up to 19% of the patients. In these cases, transvenous placement of a right ventricular catheter has been required to generate VF and appropriately evaluate the device. We report a new technique of noninvasive induction of VF using a low energy external nonsynchronized shock delivered during ICD fibrillation induction pacing. In three patients, after all efforts to induce VF by the Ventritex Cadence V-100 had failed, a 20 J nonsynchronized shock was delivered during rapid RV pacing. This resulted in VF on the first attempt in all patients. This noninvasive technique of VF initiation may provide a useful clinical approach to ICD testing that eliminates the costs and risks of an invasive procedure.

The proarrhythmic potential of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is remarkably effective in preventing sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients, but it also has the capacity to provoke or worsen cardiac arrhythmias. Tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias may result from the delivery of antitachycardia or antibradycardia therapies by tiered-therapy defibrillators. This proarrhythmia, although rarely fatal, increases the morbidity associated with defibrillator therapy. Proarrhythmia is related as much to suboptimal programming as to technical limitations of the device. The proarrhythmic potential of ICD therapy can be minimized by tailoring the "electrical prescription" according to characteristics of the clinical arrhythmia and individual ICD idiosyncrasies.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atriofascicular accessory pathways guided by discrete electrical potentials recorded at the tricuspid annulus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of using the recording of discrete electrical potentials to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation of atriofascicular accessory pathways with Mahaim-like properties.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four patients (3 females, 1 male) who fulfilled criteria for having atriofascicular accessory pathways with Mahaim-like properties and preexcited reciprocating tachycardia underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. The mean age was 35 years (range 27-47). Symptoms were present for a mean of 10.5 years (range 6-18). Recording of discrete electrical potentials of the atriofascicular pathway was attempted by mapping the tricuspid annulus in sinus rhythm, during atrial pacing, and during reciprocating tachycardia. During atrial pacing, a mean of seven radiofrequency pulses (range 1-14), delivered to the tricuspid annulus at the area where electrical potentials were recorded, eliminated conduction through the atriofascicular accessory pathway in all patients. No complications occurred. Tachycardia did not reoccur during a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 3-9).

CONCLUSIONS

Recording of discrete electrical potentials at the tricuspid annulus identifies an optimal ablation site where radiofrequency current can safely eliminate conduction through atriofascicular accessory pathways with Mahaim-like properties.

Low voltage shocks have a significantly higher tilt of the internal electric field than do high voltage shocks

Typically, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) uses a cardioversion shock that is a lower voltage pulse of the same morphology and tilt as its defibrillation pulse. We investigated the internal electric field resulting from an ICD low voltage shock to determine whether its field characteristics matched those of the internal electric field of a high voltage shock. We attached epicardial patch electrodes, for shock delivery, to five fresh pig hearts placed in a diluted, heparinized saline bath. We inserted two plunge electrodes into the myocardium to measure an internal voltage proportional to the electric field. Monophasic 20-msec shocks, from a 140-microF capacitor, ranging from 0.1-30 joules, were delivered through the patches. We measured the current, external voltage, and internal voltage every 0.1 msec throughout the duration of a shock. For each shock, we calculated the time point that represented the 65% tilt position as measured across the patch electrodes. At this 65% tilt time position, we measured the pulse widths and calculated the internal tilt from the internal voltage. We found that the initial internal voltage for the 30-joule shock was 173 +/- 40 volts compared to 10 +/- 2 volts for the 0.1-joule shock. Similarly, we found that the final internal voltage for the 30-joule shock was 56 +/- 14 volts compared to 2 +/- 1 volts for the 0.1-joule shock. Thus, the internal tilt for the 30-joule shock was 68 +/- 1% versus 82 +/- 3% for the 0.1-joule shock (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of shock timing on efficacy and safety of internal cardioversion for ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

We examined the effect of shock timing within the QRS complex on cardioversion efficacy in a randomized crossover test of shocks delivered at two timing intervals relative to QRS onset.

BACKGROUND

The local ventricular electrogram is used in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to synchronize cardioversion shocks to terminate ventricular tachycardia. However, the timing of the local electrogram relative to global ventricular depolarization is variable, depending on the site of ventricular tachycardia origin.

METHODS

Transvenous defibrillation leads were positioned in the right ventricular apex (cathode), coronary sinus and superior vena cava (anodes) of patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. After repeat ventricular tachycardia induction, sequential shocks with energy settings of 0.5 to 22 J were delivered simultaneously with QRS onset (QRS + 0 shock) or 100 ms after QRS onset (QRS + 100 shock). QRS onset was determined from the surface electrocardiogram. Cardioversion threshold, defined as the lowest shock energy for successful ventricular tachycardia termination, was measured for these two timings.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (13 men, 2 women; mean [+/- SD] age 60.5 +/- 7.7 years) completed testing. Cardioversion threshold was significantly lower with QRS + 100 shocks than QRS + 0 shocks (3.1 +/- 3.5 vs. 10.5 +/- 7.4 J, p < 0.01). Thirteen patients (87%) experienced ventricular tachycardia acceleration with QRS + 0 shocks, but only three patients (20%) had ventricular tachycardia acceleration using QRS + 100 shocks (p < 0.01). Of the 32 failed QRS + 0 shocks, 25 (78%) caused ventricular tachycardia acceleration, whereas only 5 (36%) of the 14 failed QRS + 100 shocks caused ventricular tachycardia acceleration (p < 0.05). Cardioversion threshold was not correlated with ventricular tachycardia cycle length, QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction or left ventricular diastolic volume (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Internal cardioversion shocks delivered late in the QRS complex during ventricular tachycardia are more effective and have a lower risk of ventricular tachycardia acceleration than those delivered near QRS onset.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways: a contemporary review

Catheter ablation techniques are now advocated as the first line of therapy for arrhythmias caused by accessory pathways (APs). The most common energy source is radiofrequency current, but technical characteristics vary. Several parameters can be used to determine the optimal target site: AP potential, AV time, atrial or ventricular insertion site, or unipolar morphology. Specific considerations are needed depending on AP location. Despite the different approaches described, there is no significant difference in the reported success rate, which is over 90%. However, the number of radiofrequency applications needed to achieve ablation appears to differ significantly, with median values from 3 to 8 reported. A combination of criteria related to both timing and direction of the activation wavefront or use of subthreshold stimulation could improve the accuracy of mapping. In patients with "resistant" APs, different changes in ablation technique must be considered during the procedure to achieve elimination of AP conduction. The incidence of complications in multicenter reports is close to 4%, with a recurrence rate of 8%. The long-term safety of catheter ablation requires further study.

Ventricular fibrillation induced by low-energy shocks from programmable implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease

Many of the newest implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide the option of programmable low-energy cardioversion for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Whereas these devices may provide less myocardial damage and increased comfort in patients receiving frequent shocks for VT, the proarrhythmic effects of low-energy cardioversion from ICDs in patients with structural heart disease are not clear. The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively the per-patient incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction after low-energy cardioversion of VT by ICDs in patients with coronary artery disease. The estimated cardioversion energy requirement was determined during the course of routine predischarge ICD testing in 40 patients with newly implanted ICDs. Two groups of patients were identified during determination of the cardioversion energy requirement: (1) a non-VF group consisting of 26 of 40 patients (65%) without VF induced by low-energy shock and, (2) a VF group consisting of 14 of 40 patients (35%) who developed VF during low-energy cardioversion. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of patient age, sex, concurrent antiarrhythmic drug therapy, VT cycle length, or type of ICD system implanted. Compared with the non-VF group, the VF group was more likely to have both a lower ejection fraction (25 +/- 5% vs 33 +/- 8%; p = 0.005) and a cardioversion energy requirement > 2 J (79 vs 27%; p = 0.005). Our results suggest that low-energy cardioversion is associated with a high per-patient risk of VF induction, and the risk is higher in patients with poorer left ventricular function and, possibly, higher cardioversion energy requirement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)