Mechanisms of defibrillation for monophasic and biphasic waveforms

Measurement of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability during Defibrillator Implantation can Substitute Defibrillation Threshold Measurement

We investigated whether defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) could be measured more safely during defibrillator implantation by measuring the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) without using any special equipment.

Nonthoracotomy ICD implantation with endocardial leads was performed in 13 patients, and through the use of the ICD function itself, ULV and DFT were measured using the delayed four-episode up-down algorithm. Myocardial injures caused by high-energy current were assessed by electrocardiograms and serial CPK-MB.

ULV was confirmed in all cases, and it strongly correlated with DFT. The average ULV was 5.9 ± 3.3J, while the average DFT was 7.9 ± 4.3J (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001, DFT = 1.20+1.14x ULV). The average ULV was thus significantly lower (p < 0.01). Although six patients were on amiodarone therapy, the strong correlation between ULV and DFT was also maintained (r = 0,97), p < 0.01) in these patients.

In all cases, the CPK-MB failed to increase, and no myocardial injuries were detectable on electrocardiograms.

We confirmed that ULV could be easily and safety measured during ICD implantation, and that ULV could be used instead of DFT.

Left ventricular geometry immediately following defibrillation: shock-induced relaxation

A previous two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound study suggested that there is relaxation of the myocardium after defibrillation. The 2D study could not measure activity occurring within the first 33 ms after the shock, a period that may be critical for discriminating between shock- and excitation-induced relaxation. The objective of our study was to determine the left ventricular (LV) geometry during the first 33 ms after defibrillation. Biphasic defibrillation shocks were delivered 5-50 s after the induction of ventricular fibrillation in each of the seven dogs. One-dimensional, short-axis ultrasound images of the LV cavity were acquired at a rate of 250 samples/s. The LV cavity diameter was computed from 32 ms before to 32 ms after the shock. Preshock and postshock percent changes in LV diameter were analyzed as a function of time with the use of regression analysis. The normalized mean pre- and postshock slopes (0.2 +/- 2.2 and 3.3 +/- 7.9% per 10 ms) were significantly different (P < 0.01). The postshock slope was positive (P < 0.005). Our results confirm that the bulk of the myocardium is relaxing immediately after defibrillation.

Biphasic waveform external defibrillation thresholds for spontaneous ventricular fibrillation secondary to acute ischemia

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine if the defibrillation threshold (DFT) after spontaneous ventricular fibrillation (VF) secondary to acute ischemia differs from the DFT for electrically induced VF in the absence of ischemia in anesthetized, closed-chest dogs and pigs.

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of external defibrillators has been tested mainly in animals and humans using E-VF, yet external defibrillators are often used in patients to halt S-VF.

METHODS

Protocol 1: biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform shocks were delivered through electrodes placed in an anterior-anterior (A-A) position (left and right lateral thorax) in nine dogs. After measuring the E-VF DFT, acute ischemia was induced with an angioplasty balloon in either the left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery, and the S-VF DFT was determined. Protocol 2: in a group of 12 pigs, the E-VF DFT and S-VF DFT were determined for electrodes in the A-A position and in the anterior-posterior position (A-P). Protocol 3: the E-VF DFT was determined in seven pigs. Then up to three shocks 1.5x the E-VF DFT were delivered to S-VF. If defibrillation did not occur, a step-up protocol was used until defibrillation occurred.

RESULTS

Protocol 1: the DFT for E-VF was 65 +/- 28 J (mean +/- SD) compared with 226 +/- 97 J for S-VF, p < 0.05. Protocol 2: the DFT was 152 +/- 58 J for E-VF and 315 +/- 123 J for S-VF for A-A electrodes. The DFT was 100 +/- 43 J for E-VF and 206 +/- 114 J for S-VF for A-P electrodes. Protocol 3: 11/37 shocks of strength 1.5x E-VF DFT (182 +/- 40 J) stopped the arrhythmia. The episodes of S-VF not halted by these shocks required energy levels of up to 400 J for defibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

External defibrillation of S-VF induced by acute ischemia requires significantly more energy than VF induced by 60-Hz current in the absence of ischemia. A safety margin >1.5x the DFT for electrically induced VF may be necessary in BTE external defibrillators to defibrillate S-VF.

Success and failure of biphasic shocks: results of bidomain simulations

The mechanisms behind the superiority of optimal biphasic defibrillation shocks over monophasic are not fully understood. This simulation study examines how the shock polarity and second-phase magnitude of biphasic shocks influence the virtual electrode polarization (VEP) pattern, and thus the outcome of the shock in a bidomain model representation of ventricular myocardium. A single spiral wave is initiated in a two-dimensional sheet of myocardium that measures 2 x 2 cm(2). The model incorporates non-uniform fiber curvature, membrane kinetics suitable for high strength shocks, and electroporation. Line electrodes deliver a spatially uniform extracellular field. The shocks are biphasic, each phase lasting 10 ms. Two different polarities of biphasic shocks are examined as the first-phase configuration is held constant and the second-phase magnitude is varied between 1 and 10 V/cm. The results show that for each polarity, varying the second-phase magnitude reverses the VEP induced by the first phase in an asymmetric fashion. Further, the size of the post-shock excitable gap is dependent upon the second-phase magnitude and is a factor in determining the success or failure of the shock. The maximum size of a post-shock excitable gap that results in defibrillation success depends on the polarity of the shock, indicating that the refractoriness of the tissue surrounding the gap also contributes to the outcome of the shock.

Defibrillation and the geometry of the heart: a novel measurement with implications for defibrillation mechanisms

We present a novel measurement for studying defibrillation mechanisms: the time course of changes in the size of the left ventricular (LV) cavity within 500 ms following defibrillation. Mechanical changes can be linked to electrical mechanisms via an understanding of excitation-contraction coupling. Eight mongrel dogs were internally defibrillated 5-50 seconds (including backup shocks) after the onset of 20 ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes per animal. Two dimensional, short axis, LV cavity, ultrasound images were recorded at 30 frames per second just prior to inducing VF, during defibrillation and following the shock. Each frame was individually analysed to yield the LV cavity area as a function of time. Defibrillation shocks were followed by a highly reproducible phenomenon: (1) a dramatic and rapid increase in LV area, (2) a more or less prominent LV area plateau and (3) a decrease in the LV area. The peak fractional area increase ranged from 1.65 to 4.64 times larger than the baseline (LV area just prior to defibrillation), averaging 2.18 +/- 0.686. Successful shocks took significantly longer (p < 0.01) to return to 1.3 times the baseline (407 +/- 209 ms) than unsuccessful shocks (296 +/- 130 ms). Extrapolating to electrical mechanisms, our novel measurement demonstrates that defibrillation causes immediate relaxation and therefore suggests a significant role for deexcitation in defibrillation.

Implantable cardiac defibrillators

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) represents an important development in the effort to reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death (almost 400,000 yearly in the United States). Early generation ICDs, which required epicardial lead systems and abdominal placement of the pulse generator, have been replaced by transvenous leads and pectoral implants. Other important refinements, which include biphasic waveforms, extensive memory capability, antitachycardia pacing, and enhanced sensing algorithms, have greatly improved patient tolerance. Ongoing trials and those in the planning stages will continue to expand the indications for ICDs and will focus on cost-effectiveness.

Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of a shock waveform for external defibrillation depends on the waveform characteristics. Recently, design principles based on cardiac electrophysiology have been developed to determine optimal waveform characteristics. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of principles-based monophasic and biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study of 118 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing or receiving an implantable defibrillator was conducted. Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and defibrillation was attempted in each patient with a biphasic and a monophasic waveform. Patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: group 1 received shocks of escalating energy, and group 2 received only high-energy shocks.

RESULTS

The biphasic waveform achieved a first-shock success rate of 100% in group 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.1% to 100%) and group 2 (95% CI 94.6% to 100%), with average delivered energies of 201+/-17 J and 295+/-28 J, respectively. The monophasic waveform demonstrated a 96.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 215+/-12 J for group 1 and a 98.2% (95% CI 91.7% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 352+/-13 J for group 2.

CONCLUSION

Using principles of electrophysiology, it is possible to design both biphasic and monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation that achieve a high first-shock efficacy.

ICD therapy in the new millennium

Remarkable progress has been made in the 15 years since ICD therapy was approved for human use. The early "shock boxes" had almost no diagnostic capabilities and required thoracotomy for epicardial patch implantation with typical duration of hospitalization of about a week. Pulse-generator longevity was less than 2 years. Modern devices provide detailed information about the morphology and rate of electrocardiographic signals before, during, and after arrhythmia therapy. The down-sizing of pulse generators and improvements in lead design and shock waveforms allow the simplicity of defibrillator implantation to approach that of pacemakers, with defibrillation thresholds comparable with those initially observed with epicardial patches. Despite the marked reduction in size and increase in diagnostic capabilities, device longevity is now longer than 6 years. Routine outpatient ICD implantation is presently feasible and will increase in frequency if ongoing primary prevention trials prove beneficial. Further advances in lead technology and arrhythmia discrimination should increase the efficacy and reliability of therapy. Finally, devices have the capabilities to treat multiple problems in addition to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias including atrial arrhythmias and congestive heart failure.

Biphasic truncated exponential waveform defibrillation

This paper presents data from studies that have compared the efficacies of biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) and monophasic damped sine (MDS) waveform defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in in-hospital defibrillation. When a shock is delivered, rhythms evolve rapidly in a variety of directions and take different courses, even over a short time. When defibrillation is defined as termination of ventricular fibrillation at 5 seconds postshock, whether to an organized rhythm or asystole, low-energy BTE shocks appear to be more effective than high-energy MDS shocks in out-of-hospital arrest. For future research, the terms associated with defibrillation should be standardized and used uniformly by all investi-gators. In particular, there should be an agreed-upon definition of shock efficacy.

External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) duration may be a factor in determining the defibrillation energy for successful defibrillation. Exponential biphasic waveforms have been shown to defibrillate with less energy than do monophasic waveforms when used for external defibrillation. However, it is unknown whether this advantage persists with longer VF duration. We tested the hypothesis that exponential biphasic waveforms have lower defibrillation energy as compared to exponential monophasic waveforms even with longer VF duration up to 1 minute. In a swine model of external defibrillation (n = 12, 35 +/- 6 kg), we determined the stored energy at 50% defibrillation success (E50) after both 10 seconds and 1 minute of VF duration. A single exponential monophasic (M) and two exponential biphasic (B1 and B2) waveforms were tested with the following characteristics: M (60 microF, 70% tilt), B1 (60/60 microF, 70% tilt/3 ms pulse width), and B2 (60/20 microF, 70% tilt/3 ms pulse width) where the ratio of the phase 2 leading edge voltage to that of phase 1 was 0.5 for B1 and 1.0 for B2. E50 was measured by a Bayesian technique with a total often defibrillation shocks in each waveform and VF duration randomly. The E50 (J) for M, B1, and B2 were 131 +/- 41, 57 +/- 18,* and 60 +/- 26* with 10 seconds of VF duration, respectively, and 114 +/- 62, 77 +/- 45,* and 72 +/- 53* with 1 minute of VF duration, respectively (*P < 0.05 vs M). There was no significant difference in the E50 between 10 seconds and 1 minute of VF durations for each waveform. We conclude that (1) the E50 does not significantly increase with lengthening VF durations up to 1 minute regardless of the shock waveform, and (2) external exponential biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic waveforms even with longer VF durations.

Fully discharging phases. A new approach to biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation

BACKGROUND

Phase-2 voltage and maximum pulse width are dependent on phase-1 pulse characteristics in a single-capacitor biphasic waveform. The use of 2 separate output capacitors avoids these limitations and may allow waveforms with lower defibrillation thresholds. A previous report also suggested that the optimal tilt may be >70%. This study was designed to determine an optimal biphasic waveform by use of a combination of 2 separate and fully (95% tilt) discharging capacitors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed 2 external defibrillation studies in a pig ventricular fibrillation model. In group 1, 9 waveforms from a combination of 3 phase-1 capacitor values (30, 60, and 120 microF) and 3 phase-2 capacitor values (0=monophasic, 1/3, and 1.0 times the phase-1 capacitor) were tested. Biphasic waveforms with phase-2 capacitors of 1/3 times that of phase 1 provided the highest defibrillation efficacy (stored energy and voltage) compared with corresponding monophasic and biphasic waveforms with the same capacitors in both phases except for waveforms with a 30-microF phase-1 capacitor. In group 2, 10 biphasic waveforms from a combination of 2 phase-1 capacitor values (30 and 60 microF) and 5 phase-2 capacitor values (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 microF) were tested. In this range, phase-2 capacitor size was more critical for the 30-microF phase-1 than for the 60-microF phase-1 capacitor. The optimal combinations of fully discharging capacitors for defibrillation were 60/20 and 60/30 microF. Conclusions-Phase-2 capacitor size plays an important role in reducing defibrillation energy in biphasic waveforms when 2 separate and fully discharging capacitors are used.

Single shock endocavitary low energy intracardiac cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Discomfort related to low-energy internal cardioversion (LEIC) represents a real problem in patients (pts) with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study was to verify if a single shock could restore sinus rhythm (SR) with a lower discomfort for the pt.

METHODS

Thirty pts with chronic AF were randomized to receive a single 350 V shock (15 pts) or multiple shocks of increasing energy (15 pts). Three leads were positioned, respectively, in the coronary sinus and in the lateral right wall for shock delivery, and in the right ventricular apex for R wave synchronization. Truncated, biphasic shocks were used. In the first group a single 350 V shock was directly delivered and a second 400 V shock was given only if SR has not been restored. In the second group, beginning at 50 volts the voltage was increased in steps of 50 volts until SR restoration. No patient was sedated. After each shock the pts were asked to rate their discomfort on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not perceived, 5 = severe discomfort).

RESULTS

SR was restored in all the subjects. In group 1 SR was obtained in 12/15 (80%) pts with the first 350 V (8.1 +/- 0.8 joules) shock, while the remaining 3 patients required the second 400 V (10.2 +/- 0.3 joules) shock. In group 2 the mean atrial defibrillation threshold was 346.7 +/- 1029.7 volts (8.0 +/- 101.5 joules). Then discomfort score was 2.5 +/- 0.6 in group 1 and 3.3 +/- 10.6 in group 2 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A single shock of 350 V restores SR in the majority of pts with chronic AF; by use this new approach, LEIC is tolerated better than the multiple shocks step-up protocol.

Optimal small-capacitor biphasic waveform for external defibrillation: influence of phase-1 tilt and phase-2 voltage

BACKGROUND

Biphasic waveforms have been reported to be more efficacious than monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation. This study examined the optimal phase-1 tilts and phase-2 leading-edge voltages with small capacitors (60 and 20 microF) for external defibrillation. We also assessed the ability of the "charge-burping" model to predict the optimal waveforms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two groups of studies were performed. In group 1, 9 biphasic waveforms from a combination of 3 phase-1 tilt values (30%, 50%, and 70%) and 3 phase-2 leading-edge voltage values (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 times the phase-1 leading-edge voltage, V1) were tested. Phase-2 pulse width was held constant at 3 ms in all waveforms. Two separate 60- microF capacitors were used in each phase. The energy value that would produce a 50% likelihood of successful defibrillation (E50) decreased with increasing phase-1 tilt and increased with increasing phase-2 leading-edge voltage except for the 30% phase-1 tilt waveforms. In group 2, 9 waveforms were identical to the waveforms in group 1, except for a 20- microF capacitor for phase 2. E50 decreased with increasing phase-1 tilt. Phase-2 leading-edge voltage of 1.0 to 1.5 V1 appeared to minimize E50 for phase-1 tilt of 50% and 70% but worsened E50 for phase-1 tilt of 30%. There was a significant correlation between E50 and residual membrane voltage at the end of phase 2, as calculated by the charge-burping model in both groups (group 1, R2=0.47, P<0.001; group 2, R2=0.42, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The waveforms with 70% phase-1 tilt were more efficacious than those with 30% and 50%. The relationship of phase-2 leading-edge voltage to defibrillation efficacy depended on phase-2 capacitance. The charge-burping model predicted the optimal external biphasic waveform.

Do the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on defibrillation efficacy vary among different shock waveforms?

This study was designed to extend our knowledge on how pharmacological modification of defibrillation efficacy is associated with shock waveform. In 35 anesthetized dogs, the baseline transcardiac DFT was determined using 12-ms monophasic and three biphasic waveforms (10 ms-2 ms, 8 ms-4 ms, and 6 ms-6 ms). Twenty-eight dogs were then treated with either lidocaine (n = 7), mexiletine (n = 7), dofetilide (n = 7), or MS-551 (n = 7), while 7 dogs were left untreated to confirm the reproducibility of DFT data. Subsequently, DFT measurements were repeated in all dogs. Waveform related differences of the baseline DFT were significant, and the monophasic DFT was higher than any of the biphasic DFTs. Lidocaine increased DFT by 11% +/- 12% (12-ms monophasic), 20% +/- 20% (10 ms-2 ms, P < 0.05), 13% +/- 20% (8 ms-4 ms), and 12% +/- 10% (6 ms-6 ms, P < 0.05). With infusion of mexiletine, the DFT increased by 17% +/- 16% (P < 0.05), 9% +/- 12%, 10% +/- 10% (P < 0.05), and 4% +/- 15%, respectively. Both dofetilide and MS-551 significantly decreased the DFT regardless of the pulse waveform (dofetilide: from -18% +/- 19% to -24% +/- 19%, MS-551; from -18% +/- 11% to -32% +/- 6%). In all drug groups, waveform related differences in DFT remained significant. These results support the view that the advantages of biphasic shock waveforms are not lessened by treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs.

Postshock potential gradients and dispersion of repolarization in cells stimulated with monophasic and biphasic waveforms

INTRODUCTION

Even though the clinical advantage of biphasic defibrillation waveforms is well documented, the mechanisms that underlie this greater efficacy remain incompletely understood. It is established, though, that the response of relatively refractory cells to the shock is important in determining defibrillation success or failure. We used two computer models of an isolated ventricular cell to test the hypothesis that biphasic stimuli cause a more uniform response than the equivalent monophasic shocks, decreasing the likelihood that fibrillation will be reinduced.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Models of reciprocally polarized and uniformly polarized cells were used. Rapid pacing and elevated [K]o were simulated, and either 10-msec rectangular monophasic or 5-msec/5-msec symmetric biphasic stimuli were delivered in the relative refractory period. The effects of stimulus intensity and coupling interval on response duration and postshock transmembrane potential (Vm) were quantified for each waveform. With reciprocal polarization, biphasic stimuli caused a more uniform response than monophasic stimuli, resulting in fewer large gradients of Vm (only for shock strengths < or = 1.25x threshold vs < or = 2.125x threshold) and a smaller dispersion of repolarization (1611 msec2 vs 1835 msec2). The reverse was observed with uniform polarization: monophasic pulses caused a more uniform response than did biphasic stimuli.

CONCLUSION

These results show that the response of relatively refractory cardiac cells to biphasic stimuli is less dependent on the coupling interval and stimulus strength than the response to monophasic stimuli under conditions of reciprocal polarization. Because this may lead to fewer and smaller spatial gradients in Vm, these data support the hypothesis that biphasic defibrillation waveforms will be less likely to reinduce fibrillation. Further, published experimental results correlate to a greater degree with conditions of reciprocal polarization than of uniform polarization, providing indirect evidence that interactions between depolarized and hyperpolarized regions play a role in determining the effects of defibrillation shocks on cardiac tissue.

Postshock recovery interval of relatively refractory myocardium as a possible explanation for disparate defibrillation efficacy between monophasic and biphasic waveforms

We investigated the electrophysiological background for the waveform related variability of defibrillation efficacy. In 22 open-chest dogs, a localized potential gradient was created using an 8-V or 16-V field stimulus across a pair of plate electrodes separated by 5 mm. The post shock recovery interval of the nondepolarized myocardium adjacent to the excited area was estimated by the residual refractory period after an appropriately timed field stimulus. The postshock recovery interval and the defibrillation threshold were compared among six different waveforms but with the same total duration of 12 ms (n = 11) or 16 ms (n = 11). Six defibrillation thresholds in individual hearts showed a significant inverse correlation with postshock recovery intervals in most dogs (8/11) tested with a total pulse duration of 12 ms (8 V stimulus: r = -0.80 +/- 0.20 [n = 11]). In contrast, waveforms with a total duration of 16 ms failed to reveal this distinct relationship. We conclude that the waveform related variability of defibrillation efficacy is associated with the refractoriness of relatively refractory myocardium when the total pulse duration is within a certain range. However, the mechanisms responsible for waveform performance may vary as the total pulse duration changes.

Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure

Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (<20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (>70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization.

Progressive depolarization: a unified hypothesis for defibrillation and fibrillation induction by shocks

Experimental studies of defibrillation have burgeoned since the introduction of the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) hypothesis for defibrillation. Much of this progress is due to the valuable work carried out in pursuit of this hypothesis. The ULV hypothesis presented a unified electrophysiologic scheme for linking the processes of defibrillation and shock-induced fibrillation. In addition to its scientific ramifications, this work also raised the possibility of simpler and safer means for clinical defibrillation threshold testing. Recent results from an optical mapping study of defibrillation suggest, however, that the experimental data supporting the ULV hypothesis could instead be interpreted in a manner consistent with traditional views of defibrillation such as the critical mass hypothesis. This review will describe the evidence calling for such a reinterpretation. In one regard the ULV hypothesis superseded the critical mass hypothesis by linking the defibrillation and shock-induced fibrillation processes. Therefore, this review also will discuss the rationale for developing a new defibrillation hypothesis. This new hypothesis, progressive depolarization, uses traditional defibrillation concepts to cover the same ground as the ULV hypothesis in mechanistically unifying defibrillation and shock-induced fibrillation. It does so in a manner consistent with experimental data supporting the ULV hypothesis but which also takes advantage of what has been learned from optical studies of defibrillation. This review will briefly describe how this new hypothesis relates to other contemporary viewpoints and related experimental results.

Effects of atrial defibrillation shocks on the ventricles in isolated sheep hearts

BACKGROUND

The effects of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on the activation sequence of the ventricles have not been previously studied. In this study we examined the events in the ventricle that follow the application of atrial defibrillatory shocks.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used video imaging technology to study the sequence of activation on the surface of the ventricles in the Langendorff-perfused sheep heart. We recorded transmembrane potentials simultaneously from over 20000 sites on the epicardium before and after biphasic shocks applied by a programmable atrial defibrillator. The first epicardial activation after the shock depended on both the voltage and timing of the shock. During ventricular diastole shocks as low as 10 V produced ventricular excitation, although the time between the shock and the first epicardial activation (latency) was approximately 30 ms. As the shock voltage was increased to 120 V, latency decreased to zero and the entire epicardium was depolarized within 30 ms. For 120-V shocks delivered late in systole, the depolarization sequence produced by the shock was similar to the previous repolarization sequence. Shocks of 120 V applied 150 to 300 ms after the previous ventricular excitation induced ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by multiple focal beats after the shock, which produced waves that propagated but broke down into reentry within regions of high repolarization gradients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that atrial defibrillation shocks excite the ventricles even at low shock voltages. In addition, ventricular fibrillation can be induced by shocks given in the vulnerable period by producing focal patterns that break down into reentrant waves.

Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation

BACKGROUND

One of the basic characteristics of electrical defibrillation is the strength-duration relationship, or the effect of pulse width on defibrillation efficacy. This relationship is important for understanding the mechanism of defibrillation and for the design of optimal waveforms. However, a detailed evaluation of the strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation has not been performed previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective study of 29 patients undergoing initial defibrillator implantation with a uniform dual coil, transvenous lead. In each patient defibrillation thresholds were measured for either short (2, 3, 4, 6 ms) or long (6, 12, 18 ms) pulse durations, with the order of testing randomized. The shock waveform was a truncated monophasic pulse from a capacitor of 150 microF. The leading edge voltage at defibrillation threshold was 566+/-100 V for 2-ms pulses. Voltages declined exponentially with increasing pulse width reaching an asymptote by 6 ms (451+/-68 V, P<.05). Defibrillation threshold voltage was insensitive to longer pulse widths. Stored energy at defibrillation threshold showed a similar relationship with pulse width. In contrast, mean current decreased monotonically over the full range of pulse durations evaluated, and there was no evidence of a rheobase.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape of the strength-duration curve and the lack of rheobase current indicate a fundamental difference between cardiac stimulation and defibrillation. The relationship between pulse duration and defibrillation threshold voltage or stored energy is well modeled by a parallel capacitor resistor circuit with a time constant of 5.3 ms.

A generalized activating function for predicting virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue

To fully understand the mechanisms of defibrillation, it is critical to know how a given electrical stimulus causes membrane polarizations in cardiac tissue. We have extended the concept of the activating function, originally used to describe neuronal stimulation, to derive a new expression that identifies the sources that drive changes in transmembrane potential. Source terms, or virtual electrodes, consist of either second derivatives of extracellular potential weighted by intracellular conductivity or extracellular potential gradients weighted by derivatives of intracellular conductivity. The full response of passive tissue can be considered, in simple cases, to be a convolution of this "generalized activating function" with the impulse response of the tissue. Computer simulations of a two-dimensional sheet of passive myocardium under steady-state conditions demonstrate that this source term is useful for estimating the effects of applied electrical stimuli. The generalized activating function predicts oppositely polarized regions of tissue when unequally anisotropic tissue is point stimulated and a monopolar response when a point stimulus is applied to isotropic tissue. In the bulk of the myocardium, this new expression is helpful for understanding mechanisms by which virtual electrodes can be produced, such as the hypothetical "sawtooth" pattern of polarization, as well as polarization owing to regions of depressed conductivity, missing cells or clefts, changes in fiber diameter, or fiber curvature. In comparing solutions obtained with an assumed extracellular potential distribution to those with fully coupled intra- and extracellular domains, we find that the former provides a reliable estimate of the total solution. Thus the generalized activating function that we have derived provides a useful way of understanding virtual electrode effects in cardiac tissue.

Optimized first phase tilt in "parallel-series" biphasic waveform

INTRODUCTION

A biphasic defibrillation waveform can achieve a large second phase leading-edge voltage by a "parallel-series" switching system. Recently, such a system using two 30-microF capacitances demonstrated better defibrillation threshold than standard waveforms available in current implantable devices. However, the optimized tilt of such a "parallel-series" system had not been defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Defibrillation thresholds were evaluated for five different biphasic "parallel-series" waveforms (60/15 microF) and a biphasic "parallel-parallel" waveform (60/60 microF) in 12 anesthetized pigs. The five "parallel-series" waveforms had first phase tilts of 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% with second phase pulse width of 3 msec. The "parallel-parallel" waveform had first phase tilt of 50% with second phase pulse width of 3 msec. The defibrillation lead system comprised a left pectoral "hot can" electrode (cathode) and a right ventricular lead (anode). The stored energy at defibrillation threshold of the "parallel-series" waveform with first phase tilts of 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% was 7.0 +/- 2.1, 6.1 +/- 2.8, 6.8 +/- 2.8, 7.2 +/- 2.9, and 8.4 +/- 3.1 J, respectively. The stored energy of the "parallel-series" waveform with a 50% first phase tilt was 16% less than the nonswitching "parallel-parallel" waveform (7.3 +/- 2.8 J, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

A first phase tilt of 50% maximized defibrillation efficacy of biphasic waveforms implemented with a "parallel-series" switching system. This optimized "parallel-series" waveform was more efficient than the comparable "parallel-parallel" biphasic waveform having the same first phase capacitance and tilt.

Effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation thresholds in humans

INTRODUCTION

Despite the common use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator to treat patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, the mechanism of defibrillation and the optimal waveform for implanted devices are poorly understood. All of the currently available pulse generators deliver exponentially declining pulses that are either automatically or manually truncated to achieve tilts of about 50% to 65%. Although this value was chosen based on experimental animal data, several theoretical models have been developed to describe defibrillation, which raise into question this choice of waveform shape. Accordingly, the present study was designed to test the effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation efficacy in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three patients undergoing cardioverter defibrillator implantation were studied. Monophasic defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were measured using a single reversal protocol at 35%, 50%, 65%, and 80% tilts by altering the pulse width of the shock. Mean defibrillation impedance was 41 +/- 6 omega. The DFT, measured by either leading-edge voltage or stored energy, was insensitive to altering the waveform tilt from 50% to 80%, only increasing when the tilt was reduced to 35%. A tilt of 65% yielded the lowest DFT voltage in only 8 of 23 patients. Significantly lower DFTs (> or = 40 V) were obtained using other tilts in seven patients. When the relationship between average current and pulse width was fit with a Weiss-Lapicque model, the data yielded a mean chronaxie of 4.6 +/- 3.0 msec and a rheobase of 4.2 +/- 1.7 A, but considerable patient variability was observed.

CONCLUSION

On average, DFTs in humans are insensitive to altering monophasic waveform tilts between 50% and 80%. There is, however, considerable patient variability, raising into question the premise that a single defibrillator waveform tilt is best for all patients.

Sawtooth first phase biphasic defibrillation waveform: a comparison with standard waveform in clinical devices

INTRODUCTION

A major limitation in a conventional truncated exponential waveform is the rapid drop in current that results in short duration of high current or longer duration with a lower average current. We hypothesized that increasing the first phase average current by boosting the decaying waveform prior to phase reversal may improve defibrillation efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To better simulate a "rectangular" waveform during the first phase, a "sawtooth" defibrillation waveform was constructed using "parallel-series" switching of capacitances (each 30 microF) during the first phase. This permitted a boost in the voltage late in the first phase. This sawtooth biphasic waveform (sawtooth) was compared to two clinical waveforms: a 135-microF capacitance (control-1) and a 90-microF capacitance (control-2) waveform. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) parameters were evaluated in 13 anesthetized pig models using a system consisting of a transvenous right ventricular apex lead (anode) and a left pectoral "hot can" electrode (cathode) system. DFT was determined by a "down-up down-up" protocol. The stored energy for sawtooth, control-1, and control-2 was 10.5 +/- 2.8 J, 12.3 +/- 3.7 J*, and 12.2 +/- 2.8 J*, respectively (*P < or = 0.01 vs sawtooth). The average current of the first phase for sawtooth, control-1, and control-2 was 7.6 +/- 1.3 A, 4.7 +/- 0.9 A*, and 6.2 +/- 0.9 A*, respectively (*P = 0.0001 vs sawtooth).

CONCLUSION

A sawtooth biphasic waveform utilizing a "parallel-series" switching system of smaller capacitors can improve defibrillation efficacy. A higher average current in the first phase generated by such a waveform may contribute to more efficient defibrillation by facilitating myocyte capture.

[Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation]

Ventricular fibrillation has been described as a "chaotic, random, asynchronous electrical activity of the ventricles due to repetitive reentrant excitation and/or rapid focal discharge". Reentrant and non-reentrant mechanisms are responsible for the initiation of ventricular fibrillation. After fibrillation has been induced, it is thought that multiple, disorganized, wandering wavelets follow constantly changing reentrant pathways. Electrical defibrillation is the only valid therapeutic approach for ventricular fibrillation. A successful defibrillation shock must be of sufficient strength to stop fibrillation but must not be so strong that damage to the myocardium occurs. The clinical use of the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator device has significantly stimulated research in the field of cardiac defibrillation. In order to develop more efficient shock waveforms and electrode configurations for smaller, and also longer lasting devices, we need a better understanding of the basic mechanisms of defibrillation. The development of computerized electrical mapping systems, capable of recording before, during and after a defibrillation shock, optical recording systems and microelectrodes, for action potential recording before and after the shock application and mathematical models have contributed much to the understanding of defibrillation mechanisms.An electrical shock hits the cardiac cells in different phases of their action potential. This results in 1) direct activation, 2) a "graded response", or 3) no effect. "Graded response" produces prolongation of the action potential and prolongs refractoriness without giving rise to a propagated activation front. Refractory period prolongation in an area that is still refractory at the time of the shock is critical for successful defibrillation. Mapping studies have shown that for successful defibrillation with monophasic shocks a minimal potential gradient of 5-7 V/cm is necessary (the exact value depends on the waveform and the orientation of the cells with respect to the electric field).Several hypotheses have been developed in order to explain the mechanisms that underlie successful defibrillation shocks. This paper will discuss the various theories. The "upper limit of vulnerability" hypothesis for defibrillation states that a successful defibrillation shock must stop existing activation fronts by directly exciting or by prolonging refractoriness just in front of the upcoming activation fronts and must not give rise to new activation fronts at the border of the directly excited area. Shocks slightly weaker then necessary to defibrillate stop fibrillation activation fronts, but give rise to new activation fronts that reinitiate fibrillation. These new activation fronts arise at a "critical point," where a critical shock potential gradient interferes with a critical degree of tissue refractoriness. Mappping studies support the "upper limit of vulnerability" hypothesis of defibrillation but not all defibrillation failures, however, can be explained by this hypothesis.Clinical data and experimental results have shown that biphasic shocks may have lower defibrillation thresholds than monophasic shocks. The advantage of defibrillation with a biphasic waveform is not yet clearly understood. We discuss some possible reasons why some biphasic waveforms have lower defibrillation thresholds than monophasic waveforms.

Modeling the interaction between propagating cardiac waves and monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: the importance of the induced spatial excitatory response

INTRODUCTION

Biphasic (BP) defibrillation waveforms have been shown to be significantly more efficacious than equivalent monophasic (MP) waveforms. However, when defibrillation fails, it tends to do so first in distal regions of the heart where induced field gradient magnitudes are lowest. We tested the hypothesis that the improved efficacy of BP waveforms results from their enhanced ability to prevent the initiation of new postshock activation fronts behind preexisting wavetails, rather than from any significantly improved ability to terminate preexisting wavefronts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An idealized computer model of a one-dimensional cardiac strand was used to investigate the spatial and temporal interactions between an underlying propagation front (or tail) and uniform MP or BP field stimuli of various intensities. Axial discontinuities from intercellular junctions induced sawtooth patterns of polarization during such field stimuli, enabling the shocks to interact directly with all cells. MP and BP diastolic thresholds were essentially equal. All suprathreshold MP and BP field stimuli successfully terminated preexisting wavefronts by directly depolarizing tissue ahead of those fronts, thus blocking their continued progression. However, the postshock response at the wavetail was significantly dependent on the shape and strength of the administered field. Low-strength MP stimuli induced an all-or-none excitation response across the wavetail, producing a sharp spatial transmembrane voltage gradient from which a new sustained anterogradely propagating wavefront was initiated. In contrast, low-strength BP field stimuli induced a spatially graded excitatory response whose voltage gradient was insufficient to initiate such a wavefront. Higher-strength MP and BP stimuli both produced graded excitatory responses with no subsequent propagation.

CONCLUSIONS

Shock-induced spatial "all-or-none" excitatory responses facilitate, and graded excitatory responses prevent, the postshock initiation of new propagating wavefronts. Moreover, BP field stimuli can induce such graded excitatory responses at significantly lower stimulus strengths than otherwise equivalent MP stimuli. Therefore, these results support an alternative "graded excitatory response" mechanism for the improved efficacy of BP over MP field stimuli in low gradient regions.

Shock-induced depolarization of refractory myocardium prevents wave-front propagation in defibrillation

The elimination of most, if not all, propagating wave fronts of electrical activation by a shock constitutes a minimum prerequisite for successful defibrillation. However, the factors responsible for the prevention of postshock propagating activity are unknown. We investigated the determinants of this effect of defibrillation shocks in 23 Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts by optically mapping cardiac cellular electrical activity by means of laser scanning. The optical action potentials obtained by this method were continuously recorded from 100 ventricular epicardial sites before, during, and after shock delivery during fibrillation. Analysis of activation maps showed that postshock propagating activity arose from areas depolarized by the shock. In 273 shock episodes, 898 sites at the border of shock-depolarized areas (BSDAs) from which wave-front propagation could have arisen were identified. The incidence of postshock propagation from BSDA sites was inversely related to refractoriness, as indexed by coupling interval (CI) or the optical takeoff potential (Vm). Specifically, there was a near-zero probability of postshock propagation if the shock caused depolarization at CIs < 50% of the fibrillation cycle length or from myocardium still depolarized to > or = 60% of the amplitude of a paced action potential (APA). Furthermore, incidences of wave-front propagation following shocks were consistently lower than the propagation incidences of naturally occurring unshocked fibrillation wave fronts, at comparable CIs and Vms. We conclude that the incidence of postshock wave-front propagation decreases with increasing refractoriness at the BSDA and that shock-induced depolarization of effectively refractory myocardium (ie, depolarized to > or = 60% APA) is required to guarantee the cessation of continued wave-front propagation in defibrillation.

Charge-burping theory correctly predicts optimal ratios of phase duration for biphasic defibrillation waveforms

BACKGROUND

For biphasic waveforms, it is accepted that the ratio of the duration of phase 2 to the duration of phase 1 (phase-duration ratio) should be < or = 1. The charge-burping theory postulates that the beneficial effects of phase 2 are maximal when it completely removes the charge delivered by phase 1. It predicts that the phase-duration ratio should be < 1 when the time constant of the defibrillation system (tau s) exceeds the time constant of the cell membrane (tau m) but > 1 when tau s < tau m. This study tested the hypothesis that the optimal phase-duration ratio depends on tau s (the product of the defibrillator capacitance and pathway resistance).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a canine model of transvenous defibrillation (n = 8), we determined stored-energy defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) for biphasic waveforms from conventional capacitors (140 microF. tau s = 7.1 +/- 0.8 ms) and very small capacitors (40 microF. tau s = 2.0 +/- 0.2 ms). Each capacitance was tested with phase-duration ratios of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3. The duration of phase 1 approximated the optimal monophasic waveform, 6.3 +/- 0.7 ms for 140-microF waveforms and 2.8 +/- 0.2 ms for 40-microF waveforms. For 140-microF waveforms, the DFT was lower for phase-duration ratios < or = 1 than for phase-duration ratios > 1 (P = .0003). The reverse was true for 40-microF capacitors (P = .0008). There was a significant interaction between the effects of capacitance and phase-duration ratio on DFT (P = .0002). The lowest DFT for 40-microF waveforms was less than the lowest DFT for 140-microF waveforms (4.9 +/- 2.5 versus 6.4 +/- 2.4 J, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal phase-duration ratio is < or = 1 for conventional capacitors and > 1 for small capacitors. This supports the predictions of the charge-burping theory.

Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy

BACKGROUND

Biphasic waveforms defibrillate more effectively than monophasic waveforms; however, the mechanism remains unknown. The "upper-limit-of-vulnerability" hypothesis of defibrillation suggests that unsuccessful defibrillation is due to reinduction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Thus, VF induction mechanisms may be important for the understanding of defibrillation mechanisms. We therefore compared myocardial VF vulnerability for monophasic versus biphasic shocks.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 10 Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, monophasic and biphasic T-wave shocks were randomly administered over a wide range of shock coupling intervals and shock strengths, and the two-dimensional coordinates within which VF was induced were used to calculate the area of vulnerability (AOV) for both shock waveforms. The arrhythmic response to biphasic shocks differed from that to monophasic shocks in three distinct ways: (1) the AOV was smaller (8.9 +/- 4.2 versus 13.9 +/- 6.0 area units, P < .02), (2) the transition zone between VF-inducing and nonarrhythmogenic shocks was narrower (14.7 +/- 4.8 versus 29.9 +/- 6.4 area units, P < .001), and (3) the entire AOV shifted toward longer coupling intervals (by 11.0 +/- 8.8 ms at the left border [P < .005] and 6.0 +/- 5.2 ms at the right border [P = .005] of the AOV).

CONCLUSIONS

Biphasic shocks encounter a smaller AOV than monophasic shocks, a narrower transition zone from VF to no arrhythmia induction, and a lesser effectiveness in inducing VF at short coupling intervals. In keeping with the upper-limit-of-vulnerability hypothesis, these waveform-dependent differences in VF inducibility might help explain the lower defibrillation threshold for biphasic shocks.

Circadian variation in defibrillation energy requirements

BACKGROUND

Reports have demonstrated a circadian variation in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. We tested the hypothesis that a similar circadian variation exists for defibrillation energy requirements in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the time of defibrillation threshold (DFT) measurements in 134 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) who underwent 345 DFT measurements. The DFT was determined in 130 patients at implantation, in 121 at a 2 months, and in 94 at 6 months. All patients had nonthoracotomy systems. The morning DFT (8 AM to 12 noon) was 15.1 +/- 1.2 J compared with 13.1 +/- 0.9 J in the midafternoon (12 noon to 4 PM) and 13.0 +/- 0.7 J in the late afternoon (4 to 8 PM), P < .02. In a separate group of 930 patients implanted with an ICD system with date and time stamps for each therapy, we reviewed 1238 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with shock therapy. To corroborate the hypothesis that energy requirements for arrhythmia termination vary during the course of the day, we plotted the failed first shock frequency for all episodes per hour. There was a significant peak in failed first shocks in the morning compared with other time intervals (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a morning peak in DFT and a corresponding morning peak in failed first shock frequency. This morning peak resembles the peaks seen in other cardiac events, specifically sudden cardiac death. These findings have important implications for appropriate ICD function, particularly in patients with marginal DFTs.

Effects of waveform and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans using a transvenous lead system

Minimizing defibrillation thresholds is important to allow for implantation of downsized pulse generators with reduced outputs while maintaining an adequate defibrillation safety margin. Recent studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in monophasic defibrillation thresholds with a transvenous lead when the polarity was reversed (proximal coil = cathode). However, conflicting data exist concerning the effect of polarity reversal on biphasic defibrillation thresholds. The present study was designed to evaluate prospectively the effect of waveform shape and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans. The group studied consisted of 26 patients undergoing cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for standard indications. All data were obtained with a transvenous lead alone configuration. Defibrillation thresholds were determined using a step-down protocol with the initial waveform and polarity randomized. Reversing polarity significantly decreased the delivered energy at defibrillation threshold with monophasic waveforms (14.8 +/- 7.1 vs 20.4 +/- 8.9 J; p < 0.001), but had no effect on the overall efficacy of biphasic waveforms (11.1 +/- 5.5 vs 12.2 +/- 6.5 J). In the subgroup of patients with high biphasic defibrillation thresholds (> or = 15 J), reversing polarity decreased the defibrillation threshold from 18.2 +/- 5.1 to 13.3 +/- 5.8 J (p < 0.001). Similarly, the improvement in defibrillation thresholds with reversing polarity of monophasic waveforms was confined to the subgroup of patients with higher defibrillation thresholds. Therefore, the lack of group effect of polarity on biphasic defibrillation thresholds may be simply due to the overall lowering of defibrillation thresholds by this waveform.

Short biphasic pulses from 90 microfarad capacitors lower defibrillation threshold

For defibrillation between right ventricular and retropectoral patch electrodes using truncated exponential pulses, the stored energy defibrillation threshold (DFT) is lower for short pulses from small 60-microF capacitors than for conventional pulses from 120-microF capacitors, but 60-microF pulses frequently require higher voltages than are currently used. The goal of this study was to determine if DFT could be reduced by intermediate size 90-microF capacitors. This study compared biphasic waveform DFTs for 120 microF-65% tilt pulses, 90 microF-65% tilt pulses, and 90 microF-50% tilt pulses in 20 patients at defibrillator implantation. The 90 microF-50% tilt pulses were selected because their duration is half that of 120 microF-65% tilt pulses. The stored energy DFT for 90 microF-50% tilt pulses (9.1 +/- 4.3 J) was less than both the DFT for 120 microF-65% tilt pulses (12.0 +/- 5.5 J, P < 0.005) and the DFT for 90 microF-65% tilt pulses (11.6 +/- 5.8 J, P < 0.005). There was no significant difference between the latter two values. The voltage DFTs for 90 microF-50% pulses (436 +/- 113 V) and 120 microF-65% tilt pulses (436 +/- 104 V) were not statistically different; the voltage DFT for 90 microF-65% tilt pulses was higher than for either of the other two pulses (490 +/- 131, P < 0.005). The DFT was 20 J or greater in three patients for both 120 microF-65% tilt pulses and 90 microF-65% tilt pulses, but it was 16 J or less in all patients for 90 microF-50% tilt pulses. When pathways were dichotomized by the median resistance of 71 omega, 90 microF-50% tilt pulses significantly reduced DFTs compared to 120 microF-65% tilt pulses for higher resistance pathways (9.2 +/- 4.0 J vs 13.0 +/- 6.2 J, P = 0.002), but not lower resistance pathways (9.0 +/- 4.8 J vs 10.9 +/- 4.6 J, P = NS). For the electrode configuration tested, biphasic 90 microF-50% tilt pulses reduce stored energy DFT in comparison with 120 microF-65% tilt pulses without increasing voltage DFT. However, 90 microF-65% tilt pulses provide no benefit.

Transvenous defibrillation lead systems

The use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator has grown dramatically over the past 10 years. One of the major advances in defibrillation technology is the development of transvenous lead systems. Compared with traditional epicardial lead systems, transvenous defibrillation leads reduce perioperative mortality, hospitalization, and costs. Transvenous lead systems provide reliable sensing of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, although redetection of ventricular fibrillation can be prolonged, especially with integrated lead systems. Both ramp and burst adaptive pacing are equally effective for the termination of ventricular tachycardia and are successful in up to 90% of spontaneous events. Defibrillation thresholds are higher with transvenous leads than with epicardial patches. These thresholds are reduced with the use of multiple transvenous leads, subcutaneous patches, or with reversing shock polarity. However, the development of biphasic waveforms has made the largest impact on the efficacy of these lead systems, allowing dual coil transvenous systems to be effective in about 90% of patients. Defibrillation efficacy is further enhanced and implantation simplified by the incorporation of an active pulse generator located in the left pectoral region. Active pectoral pulse generators with biphasic waveforms will be the primary lead system for new implants.

Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements

Biphasic shocks are believed to be superior to monophasic shocks. Monophasic anodal shocks, as opposed to cathodal shocks, are associated with improved defibrillation energy requirements (DERs). However, it is unclear how the DER of anodal monophasic shocks compare with conventional biphasic shocks. Therefore the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the DER of an anodal monophasic shock with that of a cathodal biphasic shock. A transvenous defibrillation lead with distal and proximal shocking electrodes was used. The subjects of this study were 20 consecutive patients with a mean age of 64.2 +/- 10.5 years ( +/- SD) and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.36 +/- 0.18. Six had had cardiac arrest. The DER, defined as the lowest energy that converted ventricular fibrillation to sinus rhythm, was determined twice with a step-down protocol (25 J, 20 J, 15 J, 10 J, 5 J, 3 J, 1 J). If the DER was > or = 25 J, then a subcutaneous patch was deemed necessary for system implantation. In random order the DER was determined with a monophasic anodal shock (distal electrode positive) and then with a cathodal (first phase, distal electrode negative) biphasic shock. The mean DER with anodal monophasic shocks was 15.1 +/- 8.5 J compared with 13.6 +/- 8.1 J with cathodal biphasic shocks (p = 0.4). A DER > or = 25 J was present in three patients with the monophasic waveform and in three patients with the biphasic waveform (p = NS). In conclusion, the DER and frequency of subcutaneous patch use with an anodal monophasic waveform is comparable to that obtained with cathodal biphasic waveform.

Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The truncated exponential waveform from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator can be described by three quantities: the leading edge voltage, the waveform duration, and the waveform time constant (tau s). The goal of this work was to develop and test a mathematical model of defibrillation that predicts the optimal durations for monophasic and the first phase of biphasic waveforms for different tau s values. In 1932, Blair used a parallel resistor-capacitor network as a model of the cell membrane to develop an equation that describes stimulation using square waves. We extended Blair's model of stimulation, using a resistor-capacitor network time constant (tau m), equal to 2.8 msec, to explicitly account for the waveform shape of a truncated exponential waveform. This extended model predicted that for monophasic waveforms with tau s of 1.5 msec, leading edge voltage will be constant for waveforms 2 msec and longer; for tau s of 3 msec, leading edge voltage will be constant for waveforms 3 msec and longer; for tau s of 6 msec, leading edge voltage will be constant for waveforms 4 msec and longer. We hypothesized that the best phase 1 of a biphasic waveform is the best monophasic waveform. Therefore, the optimal first phase of a biphasic waveform for a given tau s is the same as the optimal monophasic waveform.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We tested these hypotheses in two animal experiments. Part I: Defibrillation thresholds were determined for monophasic waveforms in eight dogs. For tau s of 1.5 msec, waveforms were truncated at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 6 msec. For tau s of 3 msec, waveforms were truncated at 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 8 msec. For tau s of 6 msec, waveforms were truncated at 2,3,4,5,6,8, and 10 msec. For waveforms with tau s of 1.5, leading edge voltage was not significantly different for the waveform durations of 1.5 msec and longer. For waveforms with tau s of 3 msec, leading edge voltage was not significantly different for waveform durations of 2 msec and longer. For waveforms with tau s of 6 msec, there was no significant difference in leading edge voltage for the waveforms tested. Part II: Defibrillation thresholds were determined in another eight dogs for the same three tau s values. For each value of tau s, six biphasic waveforms were tested: 1/1, 2/2, 3/3, 4/4, 5/5, and 6/6 msec. For waveforms with tau s of 1.5 msec, leading edge voltage was a minimum for the 2/2 msec waveform. For waveforms with tau s of 3 msec, leading edge voltage was a minimum for the 3/3 msec waveform. For waveforms with tau s of 6 msec, leading edge voltage was a minimum and not significantly different for the 3/3, 4/4, 5/5, and 6/6 msec waveforms.

CONCLUSIONS

The model predicts the optimal monophasic duration and the first phase of a biphasic waveform to within 1 msec as tau s varies from 1.5 to 6 msec: for tau s equal to 1.5 msec, the optimal monophasic waveform duration and the optimal first phase of a biphasic waveform is 2 msec, for tau s equal to 3.0 msec, the optimal duration is 3 msec, and for tau s equal to 6 msec, the optimal duration is 4 msec. For both monophasic and biphasic waveforms, optimal waveform duration shortens as the waveform time constant shortens.

Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can

A new 83 cm3 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) designed for pectoral implantation has been implanted most frequently using right ventricular and superior vena cava (RV-->SVC) electrodes; a patch electrode (RV-->patch + SVC) has been added when necessary to decrease the defibrillation threshold (DFT). The goal of this prospective study was to compare biphasic waveform DFTs for 3 electrode configurations: RV-->patch, RV-->SVC, and RV-->patch + SVC in 25 consecutive patients. The patch was positioned in a left retro-pectoral pocket, and the SVC electrode was positioned with the tip at the junction of the SVC and innominate vein. In the first 15 patients, all 3 electrode configurations were tested in random order; in the last 10 patients, only the RV-->patch and RV-->patch + SVC configurations were tested. In the first 15 patients, the stored-energy DFT for the RV-->SVC configuration (15.2 +/- 7.7 J) was higher (p < 0.001) than the DFT for the RV-->patch configuration (11.3 +/- 6.2 J) and the RV-->patch + SVC configuration (10.0 +/- 5.8 J). For all 25 patients, the DFT was lower for the RV-->patch + SVC configuration (9.7 +/- 5.1 J) than for the RV-->patch configuration (12.4 +/- 6.6 J, p = 0.005). The pathway resistance was highest for the RV-->patch configuration (72 +/- 9 omega), lower for the RV-->SVC configuration (63 +/- 6 omega, p < 0.01), and lowest for the RV-->patch + SVC configuration (46 +/- 3 omega, p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spatial distribution of cardiac transmembrane potentials around an extracellular electrode: dependence on fiber orientation

Recent theoretical models of cardiac electrical stimulation or defibrillation predict a complex spatial pattern of transmembrane potential (Vm) around a stimulating electrode, resulting from the formation of virtual electrodes of reversed polarity. The pattern of membrane polarization has been attributed to the anisotropic structure of the tissue. To verify such model predictions experimentally, an optical technique using a fluorescent voltage-sensitive dye was used to map the spatial distribution of Vm around a 150-microns-radius extracellular unipolar electrode. An S1-S2 stimulation protocol was used, and vm was measured during an S2 pulse having an intensity equal to 10x the cathodal diastolic threshold of excitation. The recordings were obtained on the endocardial surface of bullfrog atrium in directions parallel and perpendicular to the cardiac fibers. In the longitudinal fiber direction, the membrane depolarized for cathodal pulses (and hyperpolarized for anodal pulses) but only in a region within 445 +/- 112 microns (and 616 +/- 78 microns for anodal pulses) from the center of the electrode (n = 9). Outside this region, vm reversed polarity and reached a local maximum at 922 +/- 136 microns (and 988 +/- 117 microns for anodal pulses) (n = 9). Beyond this point vm decayed to zero over a distance of 1.5-2 mm. In the transverse fiber direction, the membrane depolarized for cathodal pulses (and hyperpolarized for anodal pulses) at all distances from the electrode. The amplitude of the response decreased with distance from the electrode with an exponential decay constant of 343 +/- 110 microns for cathodal pulses and 253 +/- 91 microns for anodal pulses (n = 7). The results were qualitatively similar in both fiber directions when the atrium was bathed in a solution containing ionic channel blockers. A two-dimensional computer model was formulated for the case of highly anisotropic cardiac tissue and qualitatively accounts for nearly all the observed spatial and temporal behavior of vm in the two fiber directions. The relationships between vm and both the "activating function" and extracellular potential gradient are discussed.

Responses of the transmembrane potential of myocardial cells during a shock

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this investigation was to study the transmembrane potential changes (delta Vm) during extracellular electrical field stimulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Vm was recorded in seven guinea pig papillary muscles in a tissue bath by a double-barrel microelectrode with one barrel in and the other just outside a cell while shocks were given across the bath. The short distance (15 to 30 microns) between the two microelectrode tips and alignment of the tips parallel to the shock electrodes eliminated the shock artifact. Following ten S1 stimuli, an S2 shock field created by a 10-msec square wave was delivered during the action potential plateau or during diastole through shock electrodes 1 cm on either side of the tissue. Four shock strengths creating field strengths of 1.7 +/- 0.1, 2.9 +/- 0.2, 6.1 +/- 0.6, and 8.8 +/- 0.9 V/cm were given for the same impalement. Both shock polarities were given at each shock strength. For shocks delivered during the action potential plateau, the magnitudes of the peak delta Vm caused by the above four potential gradients were 21.1 +/- 8.2, 33.6 +/- 13.6, 49.9 +/- 24.2, and 52.3 +/- 28.0 mV (P < 0.05 among the four groups) for the shocks causing depolarization and 37.9 +/- 14.2, 56.6 +/- 16.4, 83.1 +/- 19.4, and 92.9 +/- 29.1 mV (P < 0.05 among the four groups) for the shocks causing hyperpolarization. Though delta Vm increased as potential gradients increased, the relationship was not linear. The magnitude of hyperpolarization was 1.9 +/- 0.5 times that of depolarization when the shock polarity was reversed (P < 0.05). As potential gradients increased from 1.7 +/- 0.1 to 8.8 +/- 0.9 V/cm, the time constant of the membrane response decreased significantly from 3.5 +/- 1.8 to 1.6 +/- 0.7 msec for depolarizing shocks and from 6.0 +/- 3.1 to 3.4 +/- 1.9 msec for hyperpolarizing shocks (P < 0.01 vs depolarizing shocks). For shocks delivered during diastole, hyperpolarizing shocks induced triphasic changes in Vm during the shock, i.e., initial hyperpolarization, than depolarization, followed again by hyperpolarization.

CONCLUSION

During the action potential plateau, the membrane response cannot be represented by a classic passive RC membrane model. During diastole, activation upstrokes occur even during hyperpolarization caused by shocks creating potential gradients between approximately 2 and 9 V/cm.

Smaller capacitors improve the biphasic waveform

INTRODUCTION

Current implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) use relatively large capacitance values. Theoretical considerations suggest, however, that improved defibrillation energy requirements may be obtained with smaller capacitance values.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the energy requirement for defibrillation in a porcine model using a biphasic waveform generated from two capacitance values of 140 microF and 85 microF. Phase 1 reversal of the shock waveform occurred at 65% tilt. Phase 2 pulse width was equal to phase 1. Shocks were delivered through epicardial patch electrodes after 10 seconds of induced ventricular fibrillation. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined by a "down-up" technique requiring three reversals of defibrillation success or failure. The DFT was defined as the average of the values obtained with all trials starting from the successful shock prior to the first failure to defibrillate to the last successful defibrillation. In eight experiments, the measured parameters at DFT were as follows. The average stored and delivered DFT energies for the 85 microF capacitor were 6.1 +/- 2.1 and 6.0 +/- 2.0 J, respectively, compared to 7.5 +/- 1.3 and 7.4 +/- 1.3 J for the 140 microF capacitor (P < 0.04). The phase 1 pulse widths were significantly shorter for the 85 microF capacitor (5.1 +/- 0.8 msec vs 9.2 +/- 1.3 msec) and the impedances were lower (54.4 +/- 5.8 omega vs 59.9 +/- 6.3 omega). The mean leading edge voltage was trending higher for the 85 microF capacitor, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (374 +/- 63 V vs 326 +/- 30 V; P = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

Smaller capacitance values do result in lower energy requirements for the biphasic waveform, at a possibly higher leading edge voltage and a much shorter pulse width. Smaller capacitance values could represent a significant enhancement of well-established benefits demonstrated with the biphasic waveform.

The future of arrhythmia surgery

The future of arrhythmia surgery is discussed in light of the 25 years of historical developments that have led to the present explosion in antiarrhythmic therapies and technologies. The role of the arrhythmia surgeon in these developments is outlined, along with a number of exciting near-term and far-term developments that will continue to revolutionize therapeutic interventions for arrhythmia problems.