Effects of body position and exercise on evoked response signal for automatic threshold activation

Electrical performance and automatic capture characteristics of a 3.5-mm(2) passive fixation lead during 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Bipolar low polarization electrodes are recommended for a regular AutoCapture (St. Jude Medical, Inc., Sylmar, CA, USA) function in order to effectively detect the evoked response (ER) signal. The objective of this national multicenter registry was to evaluate the electrical performance and the AutoCapture characteristics of the bipolar ventricular pacing lead IsoFlex S, model 1636T or 1646T (St. Jude Medical), in combination with single- and dual-chamber pacemakers.

METHODS

Ventricular pacing and sensing thresholds, lead impedance, ER amplitude, and polarization signals were measured at discharge and routine follow-up visits after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. AutoCapture activation was recommended based on the results of the ER sensitivity test.

RESULTS

Of the 252 patients initially included, 109 (43%) have completed the follow-up. The mean ventricular pacing threshold was 0.43 +/- 0.19 V at discharge and 0.68 +/- 0.32 V at 12 months postimplant. The values for the ventricular sensing threshold were between 9.51 +/- 4.12 and 9.99 +/- 4.09 mV at discharge and at the 12-month follow-up. The unipolar lead impedance decreased from 533 +/- 94 to 476 +/- 73 ohms during the follow-up. The mean ER amplitude was 16.47 +/- 6.70 mV at discharge and 17.42 +/- 7.43 mV after 12 months, and the corresponding mean polarization signals were 0.59 +/- 1.00 and 0.74 +/- 1.24 mV, respectively. AutoCapture activation was recommended in at least 95% of the patients investigated over the 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The bipolar ventricular pacing lead IsoFlex S 1636/1646T shows a good electrical performance and is mostly compatible with the AutoCapture algorithm.

Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Evoked Response Sensing Methods for Automatic Capture Detection in the Left Ventricle

BACKGROUND

This acute feasibility study compared two different automatic capture detection methodologies, the reduced coupling capacitor (RCC) and the independent pace/sense (IPS) methods, for the left ventricle (LV).

METHODS

LV threshold tests were performed in DDD mode, with LV-only and bi-ventricular (BiV) pacing using an external cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator. Evoked response (ER) signals from LV leads were recorded using the LV(Tip) (LV(Tip)-->Can) and LV(Ring) (LV(Ring)-->Can) to empty pulse generator (Can) housing sensing vectors to evaluate the two methodologies. Pacing vector, pulse duration, atrioventricular delay, and interventricular delay were varied to assess their effects on ER. The minimum ER amplitude (ER(min)), signal-to-artifact ratio (SAR), and ER amplitude voltage dependence were evaluated. ER(min)>2 mV and SAR(min)>2 define potential automatic LV capture detection for the two methodologies.

RESULTS

Data collected from 43 patients (63.7 +/- 11.0 years) were analyzed, including unipolar and bipolar (14/29) LV leads. Neither ER sensing method was affected by changing the pacing vector. The LV(Tip)-->Can ER(min) was significantly decreased at the 1.0-ms pulse duration when compared to 0.4-ms (p < 0.05). During BiV pacing, LV(Tip)-->Can ER(min) increased at negative interventricular delays and decreased at positive interventricular delays relative to simultaneous pacing. LV(Tip)-->Can resulted in fewer patients with sufficient ER characteristics for capture detection, albeit only significantly at the extended pulse duration (79% vs 97%, p < 0.05) and at simultaneous and positive interventricular delays (81% vs 97%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Though LV capture detection was feasible using both investigated methods, the RCC method (LV(Tip)-->Can) sensitivity to the evaluated pacing parameters suggests the IPS method (LV(Ring)-->Can) provides a more robust performance.

Acute performance evaluation of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm

AIMS

This study evaluated the acute clinical performance of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm developed to work with all lead types and pacing vectors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During regular pacemaker implant or replacement, AutoThreshold and manual threshold tests were performed in ventricular unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP, if applicable) pacing using a customized external prototype INSIGNIA pacemaker. The success rate and accuracy of two different modes (commanded and ambulatory) of the automatic capture algorithm were used to evaluate the performance. Loss-of-capture events (two consecutive non-captured beats without backup pacing) were used to assess safety. Data of 53 patients (33 DDD/20 VVI) from four medical centres were analysed. Tested leads included 43 BP and 10 UP from nine manufacturers, and seven had electrodes with low polarization. The rate of successful commanded and ambulatory AutoThreshold tests was 96 and 94%, respectively, with an average absolute threshold difference compared with manual threshold of < 0.1 V at 0.4 ms (commanded 0.07 +/- 0.07 V and ambulatory 0.08 +/- 0.07 V). There was no significant difference in performance between UP/BP pacing, polarization, and lead type. No loss-of-capture event was observed.

CONCLUSION

When successful, the ventricular automatic capture algorithm accurately determined pacing thresholds in either a UP or BP pacing configuration among all leads tested.

Use of Automatic Threshold Tracking Function with Non-Low Polarization Leads:. Risk for Algorithm Malfunction

The AutoCapture (AC) function of new pacemakers (PM) from St Jude Medical (SJM) was originally recommended for use with low polarization (LP) ventricular leads only.However, recent reports have encouraged the use of the AC function with various leads, including those lacking a special LP design. The objective of this study was to analyze the reliability and safety of the AC algorithm application with different types of pacing leads. The study group comprised 30 consecutive patients with AC PMs connected to three different types of non-LP leads. Ten patients with SJM LP leads served as the control group. The study protocol included a complete AC function test using four different pulse widths (PW). The pacing threshold was independently assessed by a manual/semiautomatic check. Erratic behavior of polarization measurements with increasing PWs was demonstrated in 43% (n = 13) of the study group. Invalid polarization measurements resulted in erroneous algorithm recommendation to apply AC function in 17% (n = 5) of the study patients. Subsequent AC function activation lead to incorrect threshold determination due to missed noncapture in three patients. AC function should be applied with caution with non-LP leads. "Off label" use of these leads may cause erroneous polarization signal measurements which, in some cases, may result in incorrect pacing threshold determination, rendering a potential risk to dependent patients.

Ventricular evoked response as clinical marker for hemodynamic changes in dilative cardiomyopathy

The potential value of ventricular evoked response (VER) evaluation by implantable pacemakers as clinical marker for disease induced hemodynamic changes in the heart, has so far not been explicitly evaluated. We conducted a study to evaluate the reproducibility of the R spike and T wave measurements (R(VER) and T(VER)) under controlled clinical conditions and examine the correlation between VER parameters and standard echocardiographic measurements in the left ventricle. Additionally, the utility of the VER as a marker for NYHA classification and the presence of cardiomyopathy was investigated. The Physios CTM 01 pacemaker capable of recording authentic VER signal morphology, was used with low polarization fractal coated pacing leads to obtain high-fidelity VER recordings in 26 patients with conventional pacing indications (mean age: 69.1 +/- 11.8 years; 20 men). Three patients suffered from dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM), 14 from hyperthropic nonobstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM), and nine had no myopathy but suffered from coronary artery disease (CAD). Five patients were in NYHA Class IV, 19 in Class III, and two in Class II. Mean R(VER) and T(VER) amplitudes were calculated from one-minute VER recordings. Standard echocardiography parameters were determined during this recording. Two follow-ups at a mean distance of 11.3 +/- 5.7 month were performed. The reproducibility of R(VER) or T(VER) (correlation factors: 0.992 and 0.981, respectively) was superior to the reproducibility of any echocardiographic parameter (correlation factors 0.404-0.943). There was no strong correlation between VER and any echo parameter. Both R(VER) and T(VER) were significantly reduced in NYHA Class IV patients (P < 0.05), and nearly significantly reduced in DCM versus other patients (P = 0.05-0.09). HNCM made no difference to CAD. The investigation shows that analysis of VER parameters bears a promising potential for dynamic monitoring of diseases affecting the hemodynamics, and of therapeutic effects, by means of regular, nonburdening pacemaker follow-up examinations.

The influence of mental and physical stress on the autocapture function in children

The Autocapture function detects the evoked response signal (ERS) to verify beat-to-beat capture, and optimizes the output of ventricular pulse amplitude automatically. We had experience concerning the instability of the Autocapture recommendation in some patients. Evoked response is subject to variation as it is a biological event. However, the present knowledge about the Autocapture function lability is very limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether mental stress, body positions or exercise influence the ERS and PS in children. Study was performed in 15 consecutive patients [13.4 +/- 4.1 (5-20) year] with VVIR (n = 10) and DDD/VDD pacemakers with the Autocapture function (n = 5), had received ventricular leads including Membrane-E-1450T (n = 6), Membrane-EX-1470T (n = 2), Tendrill-DX-1388T (n = 3), Tendrill-SDX-1488T (n = 1), AV-Plus-DX-1368 (n = 1), Accufix-II-DEC (n = 1) and Vitatron (n = 1), and followed more than six months. Autocapture functions were measured during arithmetic mental stress test (MST), in different body positions, and during symptom-limited treadmill exercise. MST was applied in all except two (5 and 8 year old) who didn't have ability to perform. Activating autocapture was not recommended in only one with Accufix-II-DEC due to high PS. ERS was 10.5 +/- 6.3 mV during supine and increased to 11.9 +/- 7.5 mV during sitting (p = 0.017) and standing 12.1 +/- 7.2 (p = 0.002). However, ERS remained stable before, during and after both exercise and MST, which were 12.6 +/- 7.2 mV, 12.8 +/- 7.8 mV, 13.6 +/- 9.4 mV (p > 0.05) and 10.5 +/- 5.5 mV, 10.9 +/- 6.7 mV, 10.4 +/- 5.5 mV (p > 0.05) respectively. In addition, PS and recommendation about the Autocapture remained unchanged during the study. In conclusion, MST, different body positions and exercise do not have any clinically important influence on the Autocapture function in children.