A comparative study on the behavior of three different automatic mode switching dual chamber pacemakers to intracardiac recordings of clinical atrial fibrillation

Enhanced detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias with pacing devices by using more accurate atrial sensing

Purpose

Cardiac pacing devices can detect and monitor atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) which increase the risk of thromboembolic complications. The aim of this study was to compare (1) two different atrial leads and (2) standard and optimized settings to detect ATA and reject far-field R-wave signal (FFRW).

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized multi-center trial comparing St. Jude Medical OptiSense lead (tip-to-ring spacing 1.1 mm) and Tendril lead (tip-to-ring spacing 10.0 mm), having programmed atrial sensitivity at 0.2 mV and post-ventricular atrial blanking at 60 ms. We measured intra-atrial amplitudes of FFRW, intrinsic atrial signals, the amount of FFRW oversensing, and other inappropriate mode switching.

Results

One hundred and ten patients were enrolled. The mean amplitude of sensed and paced FFRW bipolar signal was 0.13 mV vs. 0.21 mV (p < 0.001) and 0.13 mV vs. 0.26 mV (p < 0.001) with OptiSense and Tendril lead, respectively. The mean amplitude of the atrial bipolar signal was 2.84 mV with OptiSense and 3.48 mV with Tendril lead, p = 0.014. With the optimized settings with OptiSense lead, one patient out of 20 (5%) had FFRW oversensing, none had undersensing of ATAs due to 2:1-blanking of atrial depolarizations, and the concordance of the ATAs by Holter and pacemaker memory was high (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient = 0.90). In the Tendril group, 12 out of 25 patients (48%) had oversensing and 4 had atrial undersensing (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The technique with an atrial lead with short tip-to-ring spacing combined with optimized pacemaker programming resulted in reliable and accurate atrial arrhythmia detection.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01074749.

Prospective Randomized Study of Mode Switching in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and may result in rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) in the DDDR mode. Mode switching (MS) reduces RVP, but its clinical benefit in patients with SND is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred two patients in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST; 2,010-patient, 6-year trial of DDDR vs VVIR pacing in SND) randomized to DDDR pacemakers with atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) storage capabilities were subrandomized to MS ON (N = 96) or MS OFF (N = 106). Cardiovascular symptoms, quality of life (QOL), reprogramming due to RVP, death, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) were compared between groups. The treatment groups were similar with regard to AF history (59% MS ON vs 57% MS OFF). AHREs occurred in 49% patients during median follow-up of 2.2 years. Median AHRE duration (in min; MS ON 116 vs MS OFF 58, P = 0.29), frequency AHREs/week (MS ON 3.5 vs MS OFF 6.4, P = 0.23), and time spent in AHRE (min/week) (MS ON 450, MS OFF 268) were similar. Reprogramming due to any RVP during AHREs occurred more in MS OFF vs MS ON (13.2% vs 3.1%, P = 0.011) and marginally more for symptomatic RVP (8.5% vs 2.1%, P = 0.062). Cardiovascular symptoms occurred in 93.6% MS ON vs 90.2% MS OFF (P = 0.38). Median number of symptoms reported per visit was similar (MS ON 1.3 vs MS OFF 1.5, P = 0.62). Median symptom frequency/severity, summed and averaged over visits, was similar (MS ON 4.3 vs MS OFF 4.5, P = 0.74). QOL was not different between groups. Death, stroke, and HFH were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

MS reduces pacemaker reprogramming due to RVP during AHREs in a small number of patients but does not improve QOL or cardiovascular symptoms overall among patients with SND.