Noncontact Mapping of Ventricular Tachycardia in a Closed-Chest Animal Model of Chronic Myocardial Infarction

Revised non-contact mapping of ventricular scar in a post-infarct ovine model with validation using contact mapping and histology

AIMS

Identification of arrhythmogenic scar using non-contact (NC) sinus rhythm (SR) mapping is limited. Dynamic substrate mapping (DSM) overcomes these limitations but is less accurate than plunge needle electrode mapping. We developed a revised method for calculating DSM which was validated using detailed histological analysis and compared with conventional mapping modalities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mapping was performed in eight sheep, >9 weeks post-myocardial infarction. Twenty multielectrode needles were deployed at thoracotomy in the left ventricle within and surrounding scar, and located using Ensite. Simultaneous catheter, needle, and NC electrograms were recorded during SR and multisite pacing. Dynamic substrate mapping maps were calculated as the maximum local peak negative voltage (PNV). Absolute mean DSM (AMDSM) maps, based on peak-peak voltage (P-PV), were calculated to minimize local pacing effects and take into account anisotropic influence. Dynamic substrate mapping and AMDSM maps were normalized based on global maximum voltages attained. Histologically quantified scar and mapping criteria were compared using Spearman's correlation and receiver operator curves (area under the curve, AUC) using 50% scar cut-off. For unipolar mapping, needles had greatest sensitivity at identifying scar which was better for P-PV (AUC; needle = 0.90, catheter = 0.70, NC = 0.66) than for PNV (AUC; needle = 0.79, NC = 0.38). AMDSM (AUC = 0.75) had superior scar discrimination than either catheter (AUC; unipolar = 0.70, bipolar = 0.71) or DSM (AUC = 0.67). Absolute mean DSM accuracy was improved when valvular geometries were excluded (AUC = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Absolute mean DSM was comparably accurate in identifying scarred myocardium as PNV needle mapping but was superior to conventional catheter and NC mapping.

Comparison of Electroanatomic Contact and Noncontact Mapping of Ventricular Scar in a Postinfarct Ovine Model With Intramural Needle Electrode Recording and Histological Validation

Background— Substrate-based ablation is useful for nonhemodynamically tolerated postinfarct ventricular tachycardia. We assessed the accuracy of the CARTO contact and EnSite noncontact systems at identifying scar in a chronic ovine model with intramural plunge needle electrode recording and histological validation.

Methods and Results— Scar mapping was performed on 8 male sheep with previous percutaneous-induced myocardial infarction. Up to 20 plunge needles were inserted into the left ventricle of each animal in areas of dense scar, scar border, and normal myocardium. A simultaneous CARTO map and EnSite geometry were acquired using a single catheter, and needle electrode locations were registered. A dynamic substrate map was constructed using ratiometric 50% peak negative voltage. The scar percentage around each needle location was quantified histologically. Analysis was performed on 152 plunge needles and corresponding histological blocks. Spearman correlation with histology was 0.690 ( P <0.001) for needle electrode peak-to-peak voltage (PPV), 0.362 ( P <0.001) and 0.492 ( P <0.001) for CARTO bipolar and unipolar PPV, and 0.381 ( P <0.001) for EnSite dynamic substrate map (≤40 mm from array). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (<50% and ≥50% scar) was 0.896 for needle electrode PPV, 0.726 and 0.697 for CARTO bipolar and unipolar PPV, and 0.703 for EnSite dynamic substrate map (≤40 mm from array).

Conclusions— Both the CARTO contact and EnSite noncontact systems were moderately accurate in identifying postinfarct scar when compared with intramural electrodes and confirmed with histology. The EnSite dynamic substrate map was comparable to the CARTO contact bipolar PPV when points >40 mm from the array were excluded.

Integrated multimodal-catheter imaging unveils principal relationships among ventricular electrical activity, anatomy, and function

Multiple imaging modalities are employed independent of one another while managing complex cardiac arrhythmias. To combine electrical, anatomical, and functional imaging in a single catheter system, we developed a balloon catheter that carried 64 electrodes on its surface and an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter through a central lumen. The catheter system was inserted, and the balloon was inflated inside the left ventricle (LV) of eight dogs with 6-wk-old infarction, created by occlusion in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Anatomy was constructed by ICE imaging (9 MHz) through the balloon. Single-beat noncontact mapping (NCM) was performed via the multielectrode array to reconstruct unipolar endocardial electrograms during sinus rhythm. Standard contact mapping (CM) of the endocardium was also carried out for reference. Myocardial infarction in anterior LV extending from the middle to apical regions was localized both by ICE and NCM and validated by CM and pathology. The overall difference in the activation times between NCM and CM was 3 +/- 1 ms. Unipolar voltage in infarcted middle anterior LV was smaller than the voltage in normal middle inferior LV both by NCM (11 +/- 4 vs. 16 +/- 3 mV; P = 0.002) and CM (11 +/- 3 vs. 20 +/- 4 mV; P < 0.001). Unipolar voltage was also inversely related to infarct transmurality, both by NCM (r = -0.87; P = 0.005) and CM (r = -0.94; P < 0.001). The infarct area by ICE (7.7 +/- 2.9 cm(2)) was in agreement with CM (bipolar voltage, <1 mV; and area, 7.6 +/- 3.3 cm(2); r = 0.80; P = 0.016). Meanwhile, the voltage threshold that depicted the infarct area by NCM was directly related to the smallest unipolar voltage reconstructed within the infarct (r = 0.96; P < 0.001). In conclusion, combining NCM and ICE imaging in a single catheter system is feasible. The preclinical development of such an integrated system and its evaluation in experimental myocardial infarction demonstrate capabilities for single-beat mapping at multiple sites as well as the online assessment of anatomy and myocardial function.

Characterization of the infarct substrate and ventricular tachycardia circuits with noncontact unipolar mapping in a porcine model of myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Conventional mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction is limited in patients with hemodynamically untolerated or noninducible VT.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to develop a unique strategy using noncontact unipolar mapping to define infarct substrate and VT circuits.

METHODS

Dynamic substrate mapping (DSM) was performed in seven pigs with healed anterior myocardial infarction. This technique defined substrate as the intersection of low-voltage areas identified in sinus rhythm and during pacing around the infarct. Pacing was also performed within the substrate to determine exit sites.

RESULTS

Anteroapical transmural scar was identified in all animals. A mean of three pacing sites was used for substrate definition. The mean area (+/- SD) was 18.4 +/- 8.8 cm2 by DSM and 15.4 +/- 6.9 cm2 by pathology (P >.5). A mean of 4.5 sites was paced within substrate. Ten of 18 paced wavefronts exited substrate adjacent to the pacing area, seven exited at distant areas, and one had two exits. VT was induced in five animals (1.6 morphologies per animal). Except for one VT, circuit exit sites were identified at substrate borders on the endocardium. VT exit sites were at (n = 6) or near (n = 3) a pacing exit site. Electrogram voltages differed significantly between substrate, border, and nonsubstrate areas in infarcted animals and in comparison with control animals. No substrate was identified in two control animals.

CONCLUSION

DSM is a reliable method for infarct substrate localization in this model. Pacing within substrate can predict VT exit sites and may prove useful for ablation of unmappable VT after myocardial infarction.

Successful percutaneous ablation of ventricular tachycardia in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, a case report

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is rarely recognized in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA). We describe a 48-year-old woman with CCTGA, systemic atrioventricular valve replacement for Ebsteinoid malformation of the valve, ventricular dysfunction and ventricular tachycardia related to the previous surgical scar. The patient had successful non-contact mapping and radiofrequency ablation of the offending tachycardia substrate.

Value of Noncontact Mapping for Identifying Left Ventricular Scar in an Ovine Model

Background— We assessed the hypothesis that “virtual electrograms” from a noncontact mapping system (EnSite 3000) could be used to localize myocardial scar.

Methods and Results— Myocardial infarctions were induced in sheep by inflating an angioplasty balloon in the left anterior descending coronary artery for 3 hours. Scar mapping was performed on 8 sheep without inducible ventricular tachycardia by use of the noncontact mapping system and a 256-channel contact mapping system. Transmural mapping needles were inserted into myocardial regions that were (1) scarred, (2) peripheral to the scar, and (3) distant from the scar. Unipolar electrograms were exported from both systems and analyzed on a personal computer workstation. The percentage of myocardial scarring at each needle site was assessed histologically. Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the degree of association between various electrogram characteristics and the presence of myocardial scarring. The only noncontact electrogram characteristic that showed any association with the presence of myocardial scarring was the negative slope duration (contact, r =0.62, P <0.001; noncontact, r =0.23, P =0.004). The other electrogram characteristics studied were electrogram maximal deflection (contact, r =0.38, P <0.001; noncontact, r =0.03, P =0.75) and minimal slope (contact, r =0.42, P <0.001; noncontact, r =0.05, P =0.54).

Conclusions— Noncontact electrograms do not reliably identify ventricular scar. Alternative strategies such as importing computed tomography images into the geometry should be used when scar localization is important.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia by Intramyocardial Injection of Ethanol in an Animal Model of Chronic Myocardial Infarction

INTRODUCTION

Direct injection of ethanol into myocardium has been shown to create large, well-demarcated lesions with transmural necrosis in normal ventricular myocardium and in regions of healed myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of direct ethanol injection on the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in an animal model of chronic myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight sheep with reproducibly inducible VT underwent an electrophysiologic study 139 +/- 65 days after myocardial infarction. Noncontact mapping was used to analyze induced VT. Fifteen different VTs were targeted for catheter ablation. Ablation was achieved by catheter-based intramyocardial injection of a mixture of 96% ethanol, glycerine, and iopromide (ratio 3:1:1). Direct intramyocardial ethanol injection resulted in noninducibility of any VT 20 minutes after ablation in 7 of 8 animals. Four of 5 animals with initially successful ablation remained noninducible for any VT at follow-up study at least 2 days after the ablation procedure. Microscopic examination revealed homogeneous lesions with interstitial edema, intramural hemorrhage, and myofibrillar degeneration at the lesion border. The lesions were well demarcated from the surrounding tissue by a border zone of neutrophilic infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation of VT by direct intramyocardial injection of ethanol during the chronic phase of myocardial infarction is feasible. It may be a useful tool for catheter ablation when the area of interest is located deep intramyocardially or subepicardially or when a more regional approach requires ablation of larger amounts of tissue.