Nitrous Oxide Sedation Reduces Discomfort Caused by Atrial Defibrillation Shocks

Diagnosis and management of colonic injuries following blunt trauma

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the preoperative diagnostic approaches and management of colonic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS: A total of 82 patients with colonic injuries caused by blunt trauma between January 1992 and December 2005 were enrolled. Data were collected on clinical presentation, investigations, diagnostic methods, associated injuries, and operative management. Colonic injury-related mortality and abdominal complications were analyzed.

RESULTS: Colonic injuries were caused mainly by motor vehicle accidents. Of the 82 patients, 58 (70.3%) had other associated injuries. Laparotomy was performed within 6 h after injury in 69 cases (84.1%), laparoscopy in 3 because of haemodynamic instability. The most commonly injured site was located in the transverse colon. The mean colon injury scale score was 2.8. The degree of faecal contamination was classified as mild in 18 (22.0%), moderate in 42 (51.2%), severe in 14 (17.1%), and unknown in 8 (9.8%) cases. Sixty-seven patients (81.7%) were treated with primary repair or resection and anastomosis. Faecal stream diversion was performed in 15 cases (18.3%). The overall mortality rate was 6.1%. The incidence of colonic injury-related abdominal complications was 20.7%. The only independent predictor of complications was the degree of peritoneal faecal contamination (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION: Colonic injuries following blunt trauma are especially important because of the severity and complexity of associated injuries. A thorough physical examination and a combination of tests can be used to evaluate the indications for laparotomy. One stage management at the time of initial exploration is most often used for colonic injuries.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Continuous Flow Nitrous Oxide and Nalbuphine Infusion for Sedation of Patients During Radiofrequency Atrial Flutter Ablation

BACKGROUND

In patients with common atrial flutter (CAF), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) causes discomfort. Patients undergoing RFA often feel pain which is difficult to control as the mechanisms are unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent sedative-analgesic-anxiolytic agent that may relieve anxiety and discomfort during CAF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective randomized study, the effect of Inhaled N2O was compared with that of intravenous sedation with Nalbuphine during CAF ablation in 76 patients (64 +/- 13 years, 56 men). We used a 24 pole mapping catheter around the tricuspid annulus and a 8-mm tip ablation catheter for each patient. Forty-two patients (group 1) underwent radiofrequency (RF) application to the cavotricuspid isthmus 5 minutes after the beginning of inhalation of a (50% N2O/50% O2) mixture. Thirty-four patients (group 2), underwent the first RF application 15 minutes after the end of an infusion of Nalbuphine (20 mg delivered over 15 minutes). Ablation-related anxiety and discomfort were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with 0 correlating to the statement "no pain at all" and 100 with "the worst possible pain." The VAS score was determined at the end of each application. The number of RF applications (group 1; 10 +/- 8 vs group 2; 11 +/- 6, P = NS) and procedure duration (group 1; 75 +/- 53 minutes vs group 2; 72 +/- 45 minutes, P = NS), were similar for the two groups. N(2)O sedation compared with nalbuphine infusion reduced VAS for anxiety (10 mm +/- 8 vs 58 mm +/- 22, P < 0.05) and for discomfort (18 mm +/- 9 vs 45 mm +/- 34, P < 0.01), respectively. Although there was more frequent vomiting in group 1; 7 of 42 (17%) than in group 2; 3 of 34 (9%), P < 0.05, patients were less likely to have hypotension during the procedure 1 of 42 (2.5%) versus 4 of 34 (12%), P < 0.05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Inhalation of a (50% N2O/50% O2) mixture during RF ablation for atrial flutter is a safe and efficient way to reduce anxiety and discomfort caused by RF applications.

Decreasing Pain and Anxiety Associated with Patient-Activated Atrial Shock: A Placebo-Controlled Study of Adjunctive Sedation with Oral Triazolam

INTRODUCTION

Implantable atrial defibrillators (IADs) have proved to be safe and effective in the management of atrial fibrillation. A potential limitation of self-activated IAD therapy is patient-reported pain and anxiety. The main objective of the present study was to determine whether triazolam improved patient perception of the shock experience or altered patient memory of shock discomfort relative to placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 15 men and women (mean age: 59 +/- 6 years) were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of triazolam. Randomized study medication was administered orally 75 minutes prior to scheduled atrial shock delivery. Patient perception of the shock experience was assessed along with sedation, memory, anxiety, and mood. Triazolam reduced mean pre-shock anxiety (t= 2.98, df = 14, P = 0.01) and shock-related pain (t= 2.74, df = 13, P = 0.01) and intensity (t= 2.64, df = 13, P = 0.018) relative to placebo. Similarly, participants recalled less discomfort the morning after shock with triazolam than with placebo (t= 2.82, df = 11, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first to investigate the use of an oral benzodiazepine administered prior to patient-activated shock delivery with an IAD. Our data indicate that oral triazolam is beneficial in decreasing pain and anxiety associated with self-activated atrial defibrillation. If triazolam provides a similar benefit in the community to that which has been reported here, this medication could be offered to patients as an adjunct to intermittent IAD therapy.