Effect of nifekalant for acute conversion of atrial flutter: the possible termination mechanism of typical atrial flutter

Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion as an independent predictor for persistent atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

AIMS

Nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that exerts antiarrhythmic effects by inhibiting rapid rectifying potassium channels and extending the effective refractory period of cardiomyocytes. It has a high success rate in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Whether the failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation has not been reported.

METHODS

A total of 92 patients with drug-refractory persistent AF were retrospectively enrolled. After all ablations, intravenous nifekalant was administrated. Patients were assigned to the success group (group 1) and failure group (group 2) based on nifekalant cardioversion results and followed for 12 months to note any episode of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

Each group included 46 patients. After 12 months of follow-up, nine (19.6%) patients from group 1 and 23 (50.0%) patients from group 2 had a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (P = 0.002). AF duration and type 2 diabetes were strongly associated with failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion. Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion, AF duration, and type 2 diabetes were potential risk factors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of nifekalant cardioversion was statistically associated with AF recurrence (adjusted RR = 2.257, 95% CI: 1.006-5.066, P = 0.048). Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion could bring a positive effect on the prognostic differentiation when added into the multivariable model (0.767 ± 0.042 vs. 0.774 ± 0.045, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Failure of nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Meta‑analysis of the efficacy and safety of nifekalant in the conversion of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Nifekalant is a new class III antiarrhythmic drug approved for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but its effectiveness in converting AF to sinus rhythm remains unclear. The present analysis aimed to investigate the effect of nifekalant in the conversion of AF. PubMed, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically used to search relevant studies published between 1999 (data at which the drug was first approved for marketing in Japan) and 2022. Randomized clinical trials, prospective studies and retrospective studies on the use of nifekalant for AF were screened. The study metrics included the success rate of the conversion of AF, the mean time to conversion, the success rate of 12 months after a single AF catheter ablation procedure and the incidence of adverse events. The eligible studies screened included six randomized clinical trials, three prospective studies and three retrospective studies, totalling 12 studies with 1,162 patients. The risk ratio (RR) for successful conversion in the nifekalant and control groups was 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.08; P=0.005] and the mean difference for the mean time to conversion was -1.73 [95% CI, -2.69-(-0.77); P=0.0004]. Statistically significant differences were observed between nifekalant and control groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the success rate of conversion following catheter ablation in the nifekalant group compared with the amiodarone group and the RR value was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.37-2.77; P=0.0002). Statistically significant difference was observed compared with the electrical cardioversion group and the RR value was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P=0.01). However, the combined RR values for the two groups were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.85-1.65; P<0.0002). The RR value for adverse events was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.51-1.43; P=0.55), with no statistically significant differences between nifekalant and control groups. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that the success rate and time to conversion in the nifekalant group were improved compared with those in the control group, particularly after catheter ablation, and the conversion effect with nifekalant was significantly improved compared with that in the control group.

Long-term nifekalant use in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular tachycardia

The potential utility of nifekalant, a new Class III antiarrhythmic drug, to offer long-term protection against ventricular arrhythmia has been investigated in this case report. A 44-year-old male patient with dilated cardiomyopathy complicated with heart failure and persistent ventricular tachycardia was treated with nifekalant. The patient was treated with nifekalant for 31 days, which effectively terminated ventricular tachycardia and maintained sinus rhythm, with no clinical adverse reactions. After heart transplantation, postoperative follow-up showed good cardiac function and no arrhythmia. On the basis of nifekalant’s working mechanism, there is a good chance that it can cure ventricular arrhythmia on a long-term basis.

Intraprocedural Conversion Efficacy of Intravenous Nifekalant Administration for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy, safety, and predictive effect of intravenous nifekalant administration for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) on 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) -free survival by examining the pharmacological conversion rate.One hundred and two drug-refractory, consecutive PerAF patients undergoing PVI were enrolled in this prospective observational study. After PVI, nifekalant (50 mg) was given followed by 30 minutes of observation and no further intervention. PerAF was successfully converted to sinus rhythm (SR) in 60 patients (58.8%) after a median time of 7.75 (4.13-12) minutes (group N). In the remaining 42 patients (41.2%) (group C), PerAF was successfully converted to SR by external electrical cardioversion. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurred in 1 patient in group N. The left atrial volume (LAV) in group C was larger than that in group N (128.2 ± 28.2 versus 111.8 ± 24.5 mL, P = 0.002). Phrenic nerve injury occurred in 4 of 102 patients (3.9%). No other complications occurred during the procedure or within the 1-year follow-up period. At the 1-year follow-up, after a 3-month blanking period (BP), ATa-free survival during 1-year follow-up in group C was significantly lower than that in group N (50.0% versus 71.7%, P = 0.026), and the overall ATa-free survival rate was 62.7%. Two patients in group C and 4 patients in group N underwent a second procedure with radiofrequency catheter ablation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that unsuccessful conversion to SR (P = 0.025), ATa relapse during the BP (P = 0.000), and larger LAV (P = 0.016) were independent predictors of ATa recurrence at the 1-year follow-up.In conclusion, at the 1-year follow-up, the ATa-free survival rate after PVI with CBA for PerAF patients was 62.7%, and successful conversion to SR with nifekalant could serve as a clinical predictor of reduced ATa recurrence.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different doses of nifekalant in the instant cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation during radiofrequency ablation

Nifekalant has been used in the treatment of atrial arrhythmia recently. However, there is no consensus on the preferable nifekalant dose to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to explore efficacy and safety of different doses of nifekalant in the cardioversion of persistent AF. The study was a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. All subjects received nifekalant or placebo intravenously, and the nifekalant was given at the dosage of 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 mg/kg. Primary efficacy end-point: compared with 0.3 mg group, the rate of cardioversion to sinus rhythm from AF in 0.4 and 0.5 mg group was higher. The 0.4 and 0.5 mg/kg doses were associated with a similar magnitude of efficacy (P > .05). Secondary efficacy end-point: termination rates of AF in the group of 0.4 mg and 0.5 mg were higher than 0.3 mg. Primary safety end-point: the rate of Torsades de Pointes or ventricular fibrillation was numerically lower in the 0.4 mg group than 0.5 mg group (P = .02). Secondary safety end-point: The rates of the majority of other common drug-related adverse events in the group of 0.5 and 0.4 mg were higher than the 0.3 mg group. A 0.4 mg/kg dose of intravenous nifekalant may be recommended during the radiofrequency ablation for persistent AF considering the benefit-risk profile.

Atrial pacing and administration of nifekalant hydrochloride for unstable atrial fibrillation: a case report

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can deteriorate haemodynamic status.

Case summary

We report a case of a 77-year-old woman with cardiogenic shock due to paroxysmal AF, complicated with HCM and aortic stenosis. Atrial fibrillation was successfully managed with temporary atrial pacing and administration of nifekalant hydrochloride without invasive mechanical circulatory support until surgery. Septal myectomy, aortic valve replacement, and pulmonary vein isolation were performed.

Discussion

This case suggests that atrial pacing and nifekalant may be safe and effective for rhythm control.

Nifekalant

Atrial fibrillation along with accessory pathway–induced ventricular pre-excitation may be life-threatening due to the high risk of developing severe hypotension, ventricular fibrillation, and sudden death. We demonstrate nifekalant as an effective agent in the pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with high-risk accessory pathways. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Efficacy of Nifekalant in Patients With Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiological and Clinical Findings

Background

The efficacy of nifekalant in preexcited atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been assessed.

Methods and Results

The study populations consisted of patients with sustained preexcited AF (n=51), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n=201), and persistent AF (n=87). Effects of intravenous infusion of nifekalant were assessed on electrophysiological and clinical parameters. Nifekalant prolonged the shortest preexcited R‐R, the average preexcited R‐R, and the average R‐R intervals from 290±35 to 333±44 ms, 353±49 to 443±64 ms, and 356±53 to 467±75 ms, respectively, in patients with preexcited AF (all P<0.001). Nifekalant also decreased the percentage of preexcited QRS complexes, heart rate, and increased systolic pressure (all P<0.001). Nifekalant terminated AF in 33 of 51 patients (65%). Similar effects were also observed in a subgroup of 12 patients with preexcited AF and impaired left ventricular function. In patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, nifekalant significantly prolonged the effective refractory period, the block cycle length of the antegrade accessory pathway, and the atrial effective refractory period (all P<0.001). Nifekalant had no effect on the effective refractory period of the antegrade atrioventricular node. Finally, in patients with persistent AF without an accessory pathway, nifekalant did not significantly decrease the ventricular rate of AF. One patient developed Torsades de Pointes. No other adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions

Nifekalant prolongs the effective refractory period of the antegrade accessory pathway and atrium without blocking antegrade conduction through the atrioventricular node, leading to slowing and/or to termination of preexcited AF. Thus, nifekalant might be an effective and a relatively safe drug in patients with preexcited AF.

Differential Effectiveness of Landiolol Between Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter/Atrial Tachycardia Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Landiolol, an ultra-short acting β₁-selective blocker, is more effective for controlling the heart rate (HR) than digoxin in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The impact of the type of atrial tachyarrhythmias on the effectiveness of landiolol is uncertain. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of landiolol on tachycardiac atrial fibrillation (AF) and tachycardiac atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia (AFl/AT) in patients with reduced LV function. Methods and Results: Seventy-seven patients treated with landiolol were retrospectively analyzed. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the AF group (n=65) and AFl/AT group (n=12). Despite a higher dosage, the %change in HR from baseline to 12 and 24 h was only -10.2±12.7% and -16.1±19.4% in the AFl/AT group, while it was -28.3±13.2% and -31.3±11.3% in the AF group (P<0.02), respectively. The prevalence of the responders to landiolol treatment was much greater in the AF group than in the AFl/AT group (P<0.001). Alternative treatments such as i.v. amiodarone and electrical cardioversion were required in 83% of the AFl/AT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Landiolol was ineffective in the majority of AFl/AT patients. An alternative management to prevent any worsening of heart failure might be considered in those patients.

Clinical Utility of Intravenous Nifekalant Injection during Radiofrequency catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging even in RFCA-era for AF. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of nifekalant, a pure potassium channel blocker,during RFCA for persistent AF.

Methods and results

We retrospectively enrolled 157 consecutive persistentAF patientsundergoing first RFCA procedure withcomplex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)ablation after pulmonary veins isolation and compared outcomes between patientswith (NFK group: N=79) and without (No-NFK group: N=78)additional CFAE ablation using intravenous nifekalant (0.3mg/kg). Primary endpoint was 24-month atrial arrhythmia-free survival post ablation.The prevalence of AF terminationwas significantly higher in NFK group than No-NFK group (64.6% versus 7.7%, P<0.001). Arrhythmia-free survival, however, was not significantly different between 2 groups (61.5% versus 54.1%, P=0.63).There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the prevalence of recurrent atrial tachycardia(25.0% versus 23.5%, P=0.89). Arrhythmia-free survivalin patients with AF termination during procedure was significantly higher thanthose without (73.0% versus 41.0%, P=0.002; adjusted hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.84, P=0.02) amongNFK group,but not amongNo-NFK group (66.7% versus 53.2%, P=0.53).

Conclusions

Intravenous nifekalant injection during additional CFAE ablation did not improve sinus maintenancerate after RFCA procedure for AF, but AF termination by nifekalant injection could be a clinical predictor of better success rates after procedure.