Relation of the atrial input sites to the dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: crossing of conduction curves generated with posterior and anterior pacing

Ventricular-triggered atrial pacing: A new maneuver for slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular (AV) node duality is suggested by several electrophysiological findings, none of which are strong predictors of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to propose a novel maneuver to study conduction over the AV node and attempt to induce slow-fast AVNRT.

METHODS

Ventricular-triggered atrial pacing (VTAP) with decremental VA delay was carried out in 36 consecutive patients with slow-fast AVNRT and in 21 controls after conventional electrophysiology study. Maneuvers were repeated after ablation in patients with AVNRT.

RESULTS

VTAP resulted in a hysteretic conduction curve in 21 of 36 patients (58%) in the AVNRT group but only 4 of 21 patients (19%) in the control group (sensitivity 58; specificity 81%). This finding demonstrates sustained conduction in a slow conducting pathway and concealed retrograde conduction over a fast pathway. VTAP resulted in AVNRT induction in 15 of 25 inducible patients at baseline (60%), 4 of which were not inducible with incremental pacing or programmed atrial stimulation. VTAP resulting in a suspended p wave had 51% (39%-64%) sensitivity and 100% (89%-100%) specificity for predicting noninducibility in a given autonomic state.

CONCLUSION

VTAP is useful in patients with suspected slow-fast AVNRT. A hysteretic conduction curve demonstrates sustained conduction over a slow pathway and concealed retrograde conduction through the fast pathway, a finding in favor of slow-fast AVNRT. VTAP may facilitate AVNRT induction and proves to be an interesting complement to classic maneuvers. A suspended p-wave response specifically predicts noninducibility of slow-fast AVNRT in a given autonomic state, providing an interesting surrogate to noninducibility as a procedural end point.

Functional characteristics and inducibility of atrioventricular nodal re-entry in rabbits of different ages

AIMS

Many issues regarding atrioventricular nodal re-entry (AVNR) remain unexplored; however, no stable animal model for the study of AVNR has yet been developed. Clinically, AVNR is found more commonly in adults than children. We attempt to characterize AV nodal functional properties and inducibility of AVNRT using rabbits of three different age groups since we hypothesize that the inducibility of AVNR may increase as the subject ages.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the inducibility of AVNR and the functional characteristics of the AV node in 6-month-old (Group 1), 2-month-old (Group 2), and at 1-week-old (Group 3) rabbits using a well-established rabbit heart model. We found that the inducibility of AVNR was higher in the 2-month-old group, compared with the 1-week-old group (30%). There was no functional difference between the two older groups (6-month-old and 2-month-old groups), however the youngest group (Group 3) showed better AV nodal functional properties. Regarding the correlation between inducibility and nodal functional properties, subgroups with AVNR demonstrated a longer AH maximum (AHmax) compared with the non-re-entry group, although there is no difference in age-adjusted AHmax. Regarding the correlation between inducibility and nodal functional properties, for the 1-week-old rabbits, subgroups with AVNR demonstrated a shorter AH minimum compared with the non-re-entry group (39.0 vs. 61.0, P=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that both 2-month-old and 6-month-old rabbits represent stable models for AVNR. Longer AH conduction time may lead to greater re-entry inducibility.

The Electrophysiological Characteristics in Patients with Ventricular Stimulation Inducible Fast-Slow Form Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation.

METHODS

The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%).

RESULTS

Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.

The Electrophysiologic Characteristics in Patients with Only Ventricular-Pacing Inducible Slow–Fast Form Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be usually induced by atrial pacing or extrastimulation. However, it is less commonly induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with slow-fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation.

METHODS

The total population was 1497 patients associated with AVNRT. There were 1373 (91.7%) patients who had slow-fast form AVNRT included in our study. Group 1 (n = 45) could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation, and Group 2 (n = 1328) could be induced by only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were compared.

RESULTS

Group 1 patients had a significantly lower incidence of both antegrade and retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The pacing cycle length (CL) of the antegrade 1:1 fast pathway (FP) and antegrade ERP of the FP were both significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. Mean antegrade FRP of the fast and slow pathways were significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. The differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP were much longer in Group 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the patients with slow-fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of dual AV nodal pathways and the different electrophysiologic characteristics (shorter pacing CL of the antegrade 1:1 FP, antegrade ERP of the FP and the differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP) from the other patients. The specific electrophysiologic characteristics in such patients could be the reason that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation.

Effects of a blocked atrial beat on the atrioventricular nodal recovery property in patients with dual nodal pathways

Dual AVN physiology can be demonstrated by a variety of maneuvers. To determine whether AVN recovery times following a blocked extrastimulus facilitate or obscure detection of dual AVN physiology, 11 patients (9-17 years) were studied with dual AVN pathways by using single and double atrial extrastimuli. With a single atrial extrastimuli, the premature atrial stimulus (A2) was coupled to basic atrial beats (A1). The fast and slow AVN recovery curves were constructed with plots of the nodal conduction time against the recovery time (A1A2,A2H2). With double atrial extrastimuli, a fixed blocked A2 beat (A2B) was followed by a scanning atrial beat (A3). The nodal recovery property post-A2B was studied by plots of A2BA3,A3H3. In all patients the recovery curve of the fast pathway post-A2B had a leftward shift when compared to that of the pre-A2B curve (i.e., the AH was shortened at the same recovery time). The window of slow pathway conduction post-A2B disappeared totally in five patients and decreased significantly in six patients (post-A2B: 26 +/- 42 ms; pre-A2B: 80 +/- 65 ms, P < 0.05). In the six patients that still had slow pathway conduction post-A2B, the slow pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was significantly less than that of pre-A2B (215 +/- 38 vs 268 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). The fast pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was also diminished significantly (235 +/- 62 vs 357 +/- 76 ms, P < 0.0001). The authors conclude that blocked atrial beats decrease the visibility of the slow pathway conduction.

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with multiple AH jumps: electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency ablation

This article describes the additional use of incremental atrial burst pacing (A1A1) and double atrial extrastimulation with a predefined fast pathway conducted A2 (A1A2A3), rather than single atrial extrastimulation (A1A2) only, to characterize typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The authors noted an additional 32% of patients had multiple anterograde AV nodal physiology demonstrated when A1A1 or A1A2A3 protocols were deployed compared to more conventional A1A2 protocols. The A2H2max (449 +/- 147 vs 339 +/- 94 ms) and A3H3max (481 +/- 120 vs 389 +/- 85 ms) were higher in 31 patients where multiple jumps in the AV nodal conduction curve were obtained (group 1) compared to 192 patients where only single jump was obtained (group 2) (both P < 0.01). Postablation, the degree of reduction of A2H2max (49%) and A3H3max (50%) in group 1 was greater than in group 2 (38% and 42%, respectively, P < 0.05). In seven of group 1 patients in whom A1A2A3 stimulation was required to reveal multiple jumps, the A2H2max remained unchanged after ablation (237 +/- 89 vs 214 +/- 59, P > 0.05). A3H3max was the only parameter that shortened significantly after ablation. Generally, successful ablation resulted in loss of multiple discontinuities in A1A1/A1H1 or A2A3/A3H3 curves. In conclusion, a combination of A1A2, A1A1, and A1A2A3 are required to fully elucidate AVNRT. Significant shortening of AHmax or loss of multiple jumps after ablation indicates successful elimination of AVNRT in these patients.

Effects of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation on atrioventricular node electrophysiology in patients with typical atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

The atrial musculature in the cavotricuspid isthmus is a part of posterior inputs to the AV node. In patients with typical atrial flutter, effects of radiofrequency ablation of this isthmus on AV node conduction are still unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 16 patients with clinically documented typical atrial flutter. Group 1 had 8 patients without and group 2 had 8 patients with dual AV nodal pathway physiology. Electrical pacing from the interatrial septum and low right atrium was performed to evaluate antegrade AV node function before and after ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. In group 1, the AV node conduction properties were similar before and after ablation. In group 2, the AV node Wenckebach cycle length and maximal AH interval during low right atrium (356+/-58 versus 399+/-49 ms, P=0.008; 303+/-57 versus 376+/-50 ms, P=0.008) and interatrial septum (365+/-62 versus 393+/-59 ms, P=0.008; 324+/-52 versus 390+/-60 ms, P=0.008) pacing were significantly longer after ablation. Elimination of the slow pathway after ablation was noted in 2 patients, including 1 with AV nodal reentrant echo beats.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus was effective in eliminating typical atrial flutter without injury of antegrade fast AV node conduction. The atrial musculature in the cavotricuspid isthmus significantly contributed to the slow AV node conduction.

His electrogram alternans reveal dual-wavefront inputs into and longitudinal dissociation within the bundle of His

BACKGROUND

His electrogram (HE) amplitude and morphology changes were observed in our previous studies during transition from "fast" to "slow" atrioventricular nodal (AVN) conduction. This phenomenon and its significance for the dual-AVN electrophysiology are not well recognized and have not been studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Experiments were performed on 17 healthy rabbit atrial-AVN preparations during standard programmed electrical pacing. HEs were mapped along the His bundle with roving surface electrodes, along with recording of cellular action potentials (APs). HEs recorded from the superior margin of the His bundle were of greater amplitude during basic beats and decreased substantially, by 42+/-19% (P<0.01), when premature A(1)A(2) shortened to 178+/-20 ms. In contrast, the HEs from the inferior margin increased dramatically, 2.9+/-1.7 times (P<0.01), during short A(1)A(2) and remained high until AVN block occurred. In addition, during long A(1)A(2), the superior HEs consistently preceded the inferior by 1.9+/-0.7 ms. In contrast, at short A(1)A(2), the superior HEs occurred 2.7+/-0.8 ms after the inferior. Cellular AP recordings demonstrated clearly the presence of and the transition between early (fast) and late (slow) excitation wavefronts that accompanied HE alternans.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphological-electrophysiological evidence from the AV junction suggests that fast and slow wavefronts reach the His bundle differently, producing functional longitudinal dissociation into 2 domains. The characteristic HE alternans recorded from these domains are a new sensitive tool to determine the presence of distinctly different wavefronts and their participation in the conduction during reentrant or other arrhythmias. These findings provide further understanding of the mechanisms of dual-AVN electrophysiology.

Surface potentials from the region of the atrioventricular node and their relation to dual pathway electrophysiology

BACKGROUND

Clinical applications of the principles of dual atrioventricular nodal (AVN) electrophysiology in the treatment of AVN reentrant tachycardias rely on empirical findings, such as discontinued conduction curves or the presence of specific catheter-recorded signals. However, neither the shape of the conduction curve nor the surface electrograms have been validated as functionally related to the presence of slow or fast wavefronts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed in vitro studies using 10 rabbit atrial-AVN preparations. A bipolar roving electrode was used to explore the endocardial surface of the triangle of Koch during programmed electrical stimulation. Microelectrodes were impaled in AVN cells to correlate surface and intracellular responses. In 7 preparations, a specific area near the compact cell region produced surface electrograms that were dissociated in 2 distinct components, with progressive shortening of prematurity. Similar dissociation was demonstrated during Wenckebach periodicity and increased vagal tone. Cellular recordings supported the presence of early ("fast") and late ("slow") wavefronts, with different refractory properties. Although the fast-slow transition was a basis for discontinued propagation, the AVN conduction curves were smooth in the majority of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Exploration of the triangle of Koch during programmed pacing reveals the presence of dual-wavefront surface potentials. Clinical confirmation of these AVN potentials could provide a new, sensitive tool in defining dual AVN electrophysiology.

Role of the compact node and its posterior extension in normal atrioventricular nodal conduction, refractory, and dual pathway properties

INTRODUCTION

The functional origin of AV nodal conduction, refractory, and dual pathway properties remains debated. The hypothesis that normal conduction and refractory properties of the compact node and its posterior nodal extension (PNE) play a critical role in the slow and the fast pathway, respectively, is tested with ablation lesions targeting these structures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A premature atrial stimulation protocol was performed before and after PNE ablation in six isolated rabbit heart preparations. Discrete (approximately 300 microm) histologically controlled PNE lesions amputated the AV nodal recovery curve from its left steep portion reflecting slow pathway conduction and prevented reentry without affecting the right smooth fast pathway portion of the curve. The ablation shortened A2H2max from 159 +/- 16 ms to 123 +/- 11 msec (P < 0.01) and prolonged the effective refractory period from 104 +/- 6 msec to 119 +/- 11 msec (P < 0.01) without affecting A2H2min (55 +/- 9 msec vs 55 +/- 8 msec; P = NS) and functional refractory period (174 +/- 7 msec vs 175 +/- 6 msec; P = NS). These results did not vary with the input reference used. In six other preparations, lesions applied to the compact node after PNE ablation shifted the fast pathway portion of the recovery curve to longer conduction times and prolonged the functional refractory period, suggesting a compact node involvement in the fast pathway.

CONCLUSION

The normal AV nodal conduction and refractory properties reflect the net result of the interaction between a slow and a fast pathway, which primarily arise from the asymmetric properties of the PNE and compact node, respectively.

The tendons of Todaro and the "triangle of Koch": lessons from eponymous hagiolatry

INTRODUCTION

There is growing use of the Todaro tendon and triangle of Koch as anatomic icons for invasive cardiac electrophysiologists. Reasons exist to doubt this validity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Histologic sections were prepared from 96 anatomically normal human hearts. The study area extended from the crista supraventricularis to the eustachian valve and included the AV node and His bundle. This encompasses any tendon of Todaro. Because the purported triangle of Koch includes the tendon of Todaro, all of Koch's available publications were examined. The tendon of Todaro is absent in only one fourth of infant hearts, but in two thirds of adult hearts. Tendons present were less often single than double or more, rarely exceeded 4 mm in length, and were seldom > 1 mm in diameter. Tendons usually originated from the central fibrous body and ended in the eustachian valve. Their origin most often was over the His bundle or its junction with the AV node, rather than the AV node. Tendons were primarily composed of collagen. Koch never described any triangle or acknowledged existence of tendons of Todaro.

CONCLUSION

Todaro tendons are too often absent (or multiple) to warrant use as anatomic landmarks. Without this side of the supposed triangle of Koch, the entire tendon and triangle concept collapses and should be abandoned. There are numerous far more constant anatomic landmarks available to orient one to the human AV node and His bundle; these are briefly reviewed.

Electrophysiological delineation of the tachycardia circuit in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The exact boundaries of the reentry circuit in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have not been convincingly defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To define the tachycardia circuit, single extrastimuli were delivered during AVNRT to 8 sites of the right intra-atrial septum: 3 arbitrarily divided sites of the AV junction extending from the His bundle (HB) site to the coronary sinus ostium (CSOS) (sites S, M, and I) and the superior (S-CSOS), inferior (I-CSOS), posterior (P-CSOS), and posteroinferior (PI-CSOS) portions of the CSOS and the CSOS in 18 patients. The mean tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 368+/-52 ms. Retrograde earliest atrial activation was observed at the HB site in all patients. The longest coupling intervals of single extrastimuli that reset AVNRT at sites S, M, I, I-CSOS, CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS were 356+/-51, 356+/-51, 355+/-52, 357+/-51, 318+/-47, 305+/-53, 311+/-56, and 312+/-56 ms, respectively, and the following return cycles at these sites were 368+/-52, 368+/-53, 367+/-53, 367+/-53, 407+/-66, 431+/-73, 415+/-55, and 412+/-56 ms, respectively. The longest coupling intervals at sites S, M, I, and I-CSOS did not differ from each other and were longer than those at CSOS and S-, P-, and PI-CSOS (P<0.0001). The return cycles at sites S, M, I, and I-CSOS did not differ from the TCL, whereas those at CSOS and S-, P-, and PI-CSOS were longer than the TCL (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The perinodal atrium extending from the HB site to I-CSOS was involved in the tachycardia circuit. I-CSOS was thought to be the entrance of the slow pathway.

Characteristics, circuit, mechanism, and ablation of reentry in the rabbit atrioventricular node

INTRODUCTION

The circuitry underlying AV nodal reentry remains debated. We developed a model of AV nodal reentry and assessed the role of nodal inputs, compact node, and its posterior nodal extension (PNE) in this phenomenon.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A fine scanning of short coupling interval range with an atrial premature beat consistently initiated slow-fast AV nodal reentrant beats that occurred 37+/-31 msec (mean+/-SD) after His-bundle activation in 11 of 16 consecutive rabbit heart preparations. The repeated testing (>40 times) of a chosen coupling interval within reentry window (6+/-9 msec, n = 11) yielded reentrant intervals that varied by 2+/-1 msec (mean SD for 40 beats+/-SD, n = 11). The breakthrough point of reentrant activation, as assessed from four perinodal sites, varied in different preparations from diffuse (4) to anterior (1), medial (3), or posterior (3); mean reentrant interval did not differ between perinodal sites. Antegrade perinodal activation pattern did not differ at reentrant versus nonreentrant coupling intervals and thus was not a primary determinant of reentry. A PNE ablation (n = 4) interrupted the slow pathway conduction and prevented reentry without affecting antegrade perinodal activation or fast pathway conduction.

CONCLUSION

A reproducible model of AV nodal reentrant beats was developed and used to study underlying circuitry. The AV nodal reentry involves unaltered antegrade perinodal activation, slow PNE conduction and retrograde broad invasion of perinodal tissues starting at a preparation-dependent breakthrough point. A PNE ablation abolishes the reentry.

Atrioventricular nodal conduction during atrial fibrillation: role of atrial input modification

BACKGROUND

Posteroseptal ablation of the atrioventricular node (AVN) has been proposed as a means to slow the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). The suggested mechanism is elimination of the AVN "slow pathway." On the basis of the unpredictable success of the procedure, we hypothesize that, in fact, the slow pathway is preserved. Therefore, the slowing of the ventricular rate results from reduced bombardment of the AVN.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 8 rabbit heart atrial-AVN preparations, cooling of the posterior and/or the anterior AVN approaches revealed nonspecific effects on the slow and fast pathway portions of the AVN conduction curve. In 13 other preparations, simulated AF during posterior cooling (n=6) prolonged the His-His (H-H) intervals but did not reveal specific slow pathway injury. In the remaining 7 preparations, AF was applied before and after posteroseptal surgical cuts. During AF with posterior origin, the cuts resulted in longer mean H-H along with slowing of the AVN bombardment rate. However, there was no change in the minimum observed H-H, suggesting an intact slow pathway. During AF with anterior origin, the mean and the shortest H-H remained unchanged before and after the cuts in all preparations. This was associated with the maintenance of high-rate AVN bombardment.

CONCLUSIONS

Posteroseptal ablation does not eliminate the slow pathway. Ventricular rate slowing can be obtained if the ablation procedure results in a posteroanterior intra-atrial block leading to a reduction of the rate of AV nodal bombardment.

Characterization of atrioventricular nodal reentry with continuous atrioventricular node conduction curve by double atrial extrastimulation

BACKGROUND

Characterization of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with continuous AVN conduction (A1A2/A2H2) curves by double atrial extrastimulation (A1A2A3) has never been systematically studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study was composed of 33 patients with typical AVNRT and continuous AVN conduction curves (group 1) and 103 patients with AVNRT and discontinuous AVN conduction curves (group 2). Using A1A2A3 with predefined fast pathway-conducted A2, we examined the effects of slow pathway ablation on the A2A3/A3H3 curves in both groups. In group 1, anterograde AVN effective refractory period (272+/-33 versus 277+/-47 ms, P>0.05) and AVN Wenckebach block cycle length (320+/-45 versus 343+/-59 ms, P>0.05) remained unchanged after ablation. A2H2max was shorter in group 1 than group 2 (237+/-89 versus 395+/-72 ms, P<0.05) at baseline. It shortened in group 2 (395+/-72 versus 221+/-78 ms, P<0.001) but remained unchanged in group 1 (237+/-89 versus 214+/-59 ms, P>0.05) after ablation. A1A2A3 could further disclose discontinuous A2A3/A3H3 curves in 29 patients of group 1. A3H3max shortened in both groups (375+/-81 versus 238+/-82 ms, P<0.001, and 419+/-104 versus 220+/-78 ms, P<0.001, respectively) in a similar fashion. Successful ablation resulted in loss of the left portion of the A2A3/A3H3 curves in the 4 patients of group 1 with continuous A2A3/A3H3 curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of A1A2A3 could expose discontinuous A2A3/A3H3 curves in most patients with continuous A1A2/A2H2 curves. Significant shortening of A3H3max after ablation may be indicative of successful elimination of AVNRT.