Deep Sedation for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Study in 650 Consecutive Patients

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation as general anesthesia airway managements for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

The current evidence on the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an airway management technique for general anesthesia (GA) during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) is insufficient. This study aims to compare the feasibility, safety, and clinical benefits of LMA and endotracheal intubation (ETI) for airway management in AF CA.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with AF who underwent CA under GA were included and divided into two groups based on different airway management methods (66 in the LMA group, 86 in the ETI group). After propensity score matching, a final analysis cohort of 132 patients was obtained to compare procedural parameters, adverse events, and prognosis between the two groups.

RESULTS

The LMA group exhibited significantly shorter total procedural time (p = 0.039), anesthesia induction time (p = 0.015), and recovery time (p = 0.006) compared to the ETI group. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were significantly lower in the LMA group during extubation and 1-min post-extubation (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the LMA group demonstrated lower MAP levels during intubation (p = 0.029). The incidences of intraoperative hypotension (p = 0.017) and bradycardia (p = 0.032) were significantly lower in the LMA group. The incidences of delayed recovery or delirium (p = 0.027), laryngeal or airway injury (p = 0.016), cough or bucking (p = 0.001), and sore throat (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the LMA group. There were no statistically significant differences in catheter stability parameters and sinus rhythm maintenance rates between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LMA is feasible, safe, and effective in AF CA as an optimized airway management technique for GA.

Pulsed-field versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation-Impact of energy source on sedation and analgesia requirement

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) represents a novel, nonthermal energy modality that can be applied for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). Comparative data with regard to deep sedation to established single-shot modalities such as cryoballoon (CB) ablation are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare a deep sedation protocol in patients receiving PVI with either PFA or CB.

METHODS

Prospective, consecutive AF patients undergoing PVI with a pentaspline PFA catheter were compared to a retrospective CB-PVI cohort of the same timeframe. Study endpoints were the requirements of analgesics, cardiorespiratory stability, and sedation-associated complications.

RESULTS

A total of 100 PVI patients were included (PFA n = 50, CB n = 50, mean age 66 ± 10.6, 61% male patients, 65% paroxysmal AF). Requirement of propofol, midazolam, and sufentanyl was significantly higher in the PFA group compared to CB [propofol 0.14 ± 0.04 mg/kg/min in PFA vs. 0.11 ± 0.04 mg/kg/min in CB (p = .001); midazolam 0.00086 ± 0.0004 mg/kg/min in PFA vs. 0.0006295 ± 0.0003 mg/kg/min in CB (p = .002) and sufentanyl 0.0013 ± 0.0007 µg/kg/min in PFA vs. 0.0008 ± 0.0004 µg/kg/min in CB (p < .0001)]. Sedation-associated complications did not differ between both groups (PFA n = 1/50 mild aspiration pneumonia, CB n = 0/50, p > .99). Nonsedation-associated complications (PFA: n = 2/50, 4%, CB: n = 1/50, 2%, p > .99) and procedure times (PFA 75 ± 31, CB 84 ± 32 min, p = .18) did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is associated with higher sedation and especially analgesia requirements. However, the safety of deep sedation does not differ to CB ablation.

Cardiologist-Directed Sedation Management in Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The demand for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has increased. In line with this, the safety of such procedures has also increased. Traditionally, TLE is performed under resource-intensive general anaesthesia. This study aims to evaluate the safety and outcomes of Cardiologist-lead deep sedation for TLE.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 328 TLE procedures performed under deep sedation from 2016 to 2019. TLE procedures were performed by experienced electrophysiologists. Sedation was administered by a specifically trained cardiologist (bolus midazolam/fentanyl and propofol infusion). Procedural sedation data including blood pressure, medication administration and sedation time were collected. Complications related to sedation and the operative component of the procedure were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The sedation-associated complication rate during TLE was 22.0%. The most common complication (75% of complications) was hypotension requiring noradrenaline, followed by bradycardia requiring atropine (13% of complications). Additionally, the unplanned presence of an anaesthesiologist was needed in one case (0.3%). Deep sedation was achieved with midazolam (mean dose 42.9 ± 26.5 µg/kg), fentanyl (mean dose 0.4 ± 0.6 µg/kg) and propofol (mean dose 3.5 ± 1.2 mg/kg/h). There was no difference in medication dosage between those with a sedation-associated complication and those without. Sedation-associated complications appeared significantly more in patients with reduced LVEF (p = 0.01), renal impairment (p = 0.01) and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Deep sedation for TLE can be safely performed by a specifically trained cardiologist, with a transition to general anaesthesia required in only 0.3% of cases. We continue to recommend the on-call availability of an anaesthesiologist and cardiac surgeon in case of major complications.

The importance of anaesthesia in atrial fibrillation ablation: Comparing conscious sedation with general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

General anaesthesia (GA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often preferred over conscious sedation (CS) to minimize patient discomfort and reduce the risk of map disruption from patient movement but may pose an additional risk to some patients with significant comorbidity or poor cardiac function.

METHODS

We extracted data for 300 patients who underwent AF ablation between the years 2017 and 2019 and compared the outcomes of AF ablation with CS and GA.

RESULTS

Compared to the GA group, patients were younger in the CS group (63 versus 66 years, p = 0.02), had less persistent AF (34% versus 46%, p = 0.048) and the left atrial dimension was smaller (41 versus 45 mm, p = 0.01). More patients had cryoballoon ablation (CBA) than radiofrequency (RFA) ablation in the CS than the GA group (88% CB with CS and 56% RF with GA, p < 0.01), frequency of ASA score 3-4 (higher anaesthetic risk) was less for CS than for GA (45% versus 75%, p < 0.01), and procedural duration was shorter for patients who had CS (110 versus 139 min, p < 0.001). Of the patients receiving CS, 127/182 (70%) were planned for same day discharge (SDD) and this occurred in 120 (94%) of those patients. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the groups (5.1% in GA and 6% in CS, p = 0.8). AF type was the only significant predictor of freedom from AF recurrence on multivariate analysis (HR 0.33, 0.13-0.82, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the use of CS compared with GA for AF ablation was associated with similar outcomes and complication rates.

High-flow nasal cannula versus standard low-flow nasal cannula during deep sedation in patients undergoing radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a single-centre randomised controlled trial

Background

To our knowledge, there are few trials studying the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during deep sedation. Our hypothesis is that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will prevent hypoxemia and desaturation as compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC) during prolonged deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

Methods

A single-centre, randomised controlled trial with HFNC as the intervention and LFNC as the control group. A total of 94 adult patients per group undergoing elective radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation under deep sedation. will be included. The primary outcome is the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2). Secondary outcomes are as follows: the duration of lowest SpO2, cross over from oxygen therapy in both directions, incidence of SpO2 below 90% > 60 seconds, adverse sedation events, adverse effects of HFNC, mean CO2, peak CO2 and patients experience with oxygen therapy. The study will take place during the 2-day admission period for RFCA. Patients can fill out their questionnaires in the first week after treatment.

Discussion

HFNC is increasingly used as a technique for oxygen delivery in procedural sedation and analgesia. We hypothesise that HFNC is superior to the standard treatment LFNC in patients under deep sedation with respect to the incidence of desaturation. To our knowledge, there are no adequately powered clinical trial studies on the effects of HFNC in prolonged deep sedation.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04842253. Registered on 04 April 2021

Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol for Operator-Directed Nurse-Administered Procedural Sedation during Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: a Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Operator-directed nurse-administered (ODNA) sedation with propofol is the preferred sedation technique for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in many centers.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate whether Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is superior to propofol.

METHODS

We randomized 160 consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation to ODNA sedation by dexmedetomidine (DEX group) versus propofol (PRO group), according to a standardized protocol. Patients were unaware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of inefficient sedation, termination/change of sedation protocol or procedure abortion, hypercapnia (transcutaneous CO2 >55 mmHg), hypoxemia (SpO₂ <90%) or intubation, prolonged hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg), and sustained bradycardia necessitating cardiac pacing. Secondary endpoints were the components of the primary endpoint and patient satisfaction with procedural sedation, as assessed by a standardized questionnaire the day following ablation.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint occurred in 15 DEX group and 25 PRO group patients (19% vs. 31%; p=0.068). Hypercapnia was significantly more frequent in PRO group patients (29% vs. 10%; p=0.003). There was no significant difference among the other components of the primary endpoint, no procedure was aborted. Patient satisfaction was significantly better in PRO group patients (visual analog scale 0-100; median 100 in PRO group vs. median 93 in DEX group; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of ODNA sedation with dexmedetomidine was not different to propofol. Hypercapnia occurs less frequent with dexmedetomidine, but patient satisfaction is better with propofol sedation. In selected patients, dexmedetomidine may be used as an alternative to propofol for ODNA sedation during AF ablation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03844841).

The Practice of Deep Sedation in Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Laboratories: Results of an Italian Survey Promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing)

The aim of this survey, which was open to all Italian cardiologists involved in arrhythmia, was to assess common practice regarding sedation and analgesia in interventional electrophysiology procedures in Italy. The survey consisted of 28 questions regarding the approach to sedation used for elective direct-current cardioversion (DCC), subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation, atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, and transvenous lead extraction procedures. A total of 105 cardiologists from 92 Italian centres took part in the survey. The rate of centres where DCC, S-ICD implantation, AF ablation, VT ablation and lead extraction procedures were performed without anaesthesiologic assistance was 60.9%, 23.6%, 51.2%, 37.3%, and 66.7%, respectively. When these procedures were performed without anaesthesiologic assistance, the drugs (in addition to local anaesthetics) commonly administered were benzodiazepines (from 64.3% to 79.6%), opioids (from 74.4% to 88.1%), and general anaesthetics (from 7.1% to 30.4%). Twenty-three (21.9%) of the 105 cardiologists declared that they routinely administered propofol, without the supervision of an anaesthesiologist, in at least one of the above-mentioned procedures. In current Italian clinical practice, there is a lack of uniformity in the sedation/analgesia approach used in interventional electrophysiology procedures.

Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: results from the FIRMAP AF study

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the gold standard for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, catheter ablation targeting rotors or focal sources has been developed for treatment of AF. This study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM)-guided ablation as the sole ablative strategy with PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a multicentre, randomized trial to determine whether FIRM-guided radiofrequency ablation without PVI (FIRM group) was non-inferior to PVI (PVI group) for treatment of paroxysmal AF. The two primary efficacy end points were (i) acute success defined as elimination of AF rotors (FIRM group) or isolation of all pulmonary veins (PVI group) and (ii) long-term success defined as single-procedure freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence 12 months after ablation. The study was closed early by the sponsor. At the time of study closure, any pending follow-up visits were waived. A total of 51 patients (mean age 63 ± 10.6 years, 57% male) were enrolled. All PVs were successfully isolated in the PVI group and all rotors were successfully eliminated in the FIRM group. Single-procedure effectiveness was 31.3% (5/16) in the FIRM group and 80% (8/10) in the PVI group at 12 months. Three vascular access complications occurred in the FIRM group.

CONCLUSION

These partial study effectiveness results reinforce the importance of PVI in paroxysmal AF patients and indicate that FIRM-guided ablation alone (without PVI) is not an effective strategy for treatment of paroxysmal AF in most patients.

Left Atrial Isolation and Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at End-Stage Left Atrial Fibrotic Disease

[Figure: see text].

Deep Sedation with Intravenous Anesthesia Is Associated with Outcome in Patients Undergoing Cryoablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Whether deep sedation with intravenous anesthesia will affect the recurrence after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is yet to be examined. Thus, in this study, we hypothesize that there is difference in terms of the recurrence between local anesthesia and deep sedation with intravenous anesthesia after an index ablation procedure.In total, 109 patients were enrolled and received CBA, of which 68 (58.2 years) patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with a local anesthesia (group 1) and 41 patients (63.2 years) underwent PV isolation with deep sedation using intravenous anesthesia (group 2).During the index procedure, isolation of all major PVs was achieved in 66 patients in group 1 and in 41 patients in group 2. There was no difference in non-PV triggers between the two groups. The periprocedural complication was found to be similar between the two groups (2.9% in group 1 and 4.9% in group 2). Further, 17 patients in group 1 and 4 patients in group 2 experienced recurrences after a follow-up of 19.3 months (P = 0.019). Repeat procedures revealed similar PV reconnection rates between the two groups. It has also been noted that the number of reconnected PV and incidence of atypical flutter seem to increase in group 1.Deep sedation with intravenous anesthesia during CBA for paroxysmal AF is safe and had a better long-term outcome than those with local anesthesia.

Clinical Effect of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation on Left Atrial Pressure During Catheter Ablation in Sedated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Sedation during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation often provokes a decline in left atrial (LA) pressure (LAP) under atmospheric pressure and increases the risk of systemic air embolisms. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) on the LAP in sedated patients.Methods and Results:Fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI were enrolled. All patients underwent sedation using propofol throughout the procedure. After the transseptal puncture and the insertion of a long sheath into the LA, the LAP was measured. Then, the ASV treatment was started, and the LAP was re-measured. The LAP before and after the ASV support was investigated. Before ASV, the LAP during the inspiratory phase was significantly smaller than that during the expiratory phase (4.9±5.4 mmHg vs. 14.0±5.2 mmHg, P<0.01). The lowest LAP was -2.2±5.1 mmHg and was under 0 mmHg in 37 (73%) patients. After the ASV, the LAP during the inspiratory phase significantly increased to 8.9±4.1 mmHg (P<0.01), and lowest LAP increased to 4.7±5.9 mmHg (P<0.01). The negative lowest LAP value became positive in 30/37 (81%) patients. There were no statistical differences regarding obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obesity, gender, or other comorbidities between patients with and without a negative lowest LAP after ASV support.

CONCLUSIONS

ASV is effective for increasing the LAP above 0 mmHg and might prevent air embolisms during PVI.

The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux when radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia with a supraglottic device: Observational pilot study

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) occurs due to vagal plexus damage during pulmonary vein isolation. We hypothesized that the frequency of GER in the oropharynx will be less compared to other areas (low-esophagus, mid-esophagus). We confirmed the frequency of GER before and after RFCA in 3 areas.We studied 30 patients who were scheduled for RFCA under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was performed using supraglottic devices (SGD) with a suction port. Two esophageal temperature probes capable of suction and measuring temperature were inserted through the suction port. The pH of the 3 areas was measured before and after the RFCA at 3 areas (mid-esophagus, low-esophagus, and oropharynx).GER was observed in 13 of 30 patients (43%). In one patient, it was observed in the oropharynx, in 4 patients it was observed in the mid-esophagus, and in 13 patients, it was observed in the low-esophagus. For patients with GER at the oropharynx and mid-esophagus, it was also observed at the low-esophagus. The difference in the pH before and after the RFCA was not significant at the oropharynx and mid-esophagus (P = .726 and P = .424, respectively), but it was significantly different at the low-esophagus (P < .001). The total ablation time was longer in the GER group compared to the non-GER group (P = .021).GER after RFCA occurred in 43% of patients, only 1 patient in the oropharynx. And aspiration pneumonia after SGD extubation did not occur. Therefore, the use of SGDs in RFCA does not completely eliminate the possibility of aspiration, so care should be taken.

Safety of conscious sedation in electroanatomical mapping procedures and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation

Immobilization of patients during electrophysiological procedures, to avoid complications by patients' unexpected bodily motion, is achieved by moderate to deep conscious sedation using benzodiazepines and propofol for sedation and opioids for analgesia. Our aim was to compare respiratory and hemodynamic safety endpoints of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and electroanatomical mapping (EAM) procedures. Included patients underwent either cryoballoon PVI or EAM procedures. Sedation monitoring included non-invasive blood pressure measurements, transcutaneous oxygen saturation (tSpO₂) and transcutaneous carbon-dioxide (tpCO₂) measurements. We enrolled 125 consecutive patients, 67 patients underwent cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation and 58 patients had an EAM and radiofrequency ablation procedure. Mean procedure duration of EAM procedures was significantly longer (p < 0.001) and propofol doses as well as morphine equivalent doses of administered opioids were significantly higher in EAM patients compared to cryoballoon patients (p < 0.001). Cryoballoon patients display higher tpCO₂ levels compared to EAM patients at 30 min (cryoballoon: 51.1 ± 7.0 mmHg vs. EAM: 48.6 ± 6.2 mmHg, p = 0.009) and at 60 min (cryoballoon: 51.4 ± 7.3 mmHg vs. EAM: 48.9 ± 6.6 mmHg, p = 0.07) procedure duration. Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher after 60 min (cryoballoon: 84.7 ± 16.7 mmHg vs. EAM: 76.7 ± 13.3 mmHg, p = 0.017) in cryoballoon PVI compared to EAM procedures. Regarding respiratory and hemodynamic safety endpoints, no significant difference was detected regarding hypercapnia, hypoxia and episodes of hypotension. Despite longer procedure duration and deeper sedation requirement, conscious sedation in EAM procedures appears to be as safe as conscious sedation in cryoballoon ablation procedures regarding hemodynamic and respiratory safety endpoints.

Continuous transcutaneous carbon-dioxide monitoring to avoid hypercapnia in complex catheter ablations under conscious sedation

BACKGROUND

Ablation of complex cardiac arrhythmias requires an immobilized patient. For a successful and safe intervention and for patient comfort, this can be achieved by conscious sedation. Administered sedatives and analgesics have respiratory depressant side effects and require close monitoring. We investigated the feasibility and accuracy of additional, continuous transcutaneous carbon-dioxide partial pressure (tpCO₂) measurement during conscious sedation in complex electrophysiological catheter ablation procedures.

METHOD

We evaluated the accuracy and additional value of continuous tpCO₂ detection by application of a Severinghaus electrode in comparison to arterial and venous blood gas analyses.

RESULTS

We included 110 patients in this prospective observational study. Arterial pCO₂ (paCO₂) and tpCO₂ showed good correlation throughout the procedures (r = 0.60-0.87, p < 0.005). Venous pCO₂ (pvCO₂) were also well correlated to transcutaneous values (r = 0.65-0.85, p < 0.0001). Analyses of the difference of pvCO₂ and tpCO₂ measurements showed a tolerance within <10 mmHg in up to 96-98% of patients. Hypercapnia (pCO₂ < 70 mmHg) was detected more likely and earlier by continuous tpCO₂ monitoring compared to half-hourly pvCO₂ measurements.

CONCLUSION

Continuous tpCO₂ monitoring is feasible and precise with good correlation to arterial and venous blood gas carbon-dioxide analysis during complex catheter ablations under conscious sedation and may contribute to additional safety.

General anesthesia during atrial fibrillation ablation: Standardized protocol and experience

BACKGROUND

Most atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations are performed with general anesthesia (GA). The ideal GA protocol is unknown, but it affects ablation outcomes and laboratory utilization. We sought to report a GA protocol used at a high-volume center, with special consideration on efficiency and optimization of mapping and ablation conditions.

METHODS

Our protocol consists of propofol as sole anesthetic agent and analgesia with Fentanyl. IV fluids are minimized. After transseptal access, the right phrenic nerve is tagged, rocuronium is given, and redosing avoided. Ventilation is modulated to optimize mapping and ablation. After ablation, isoproterenol is infused for 20 min. After 10 min, propofol is gradually decreased and ventilation set to SIMV 8 breaths/min to promote spontaneous breathing, and then switched to pressure support and propofol stopped. Paralysis is reversed and furosemide given. Patient is extubated once meeting standard criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 1286 patients underwent AF ablation from January 2017 to December 2018 using the protocol. Mean age was 66 years (41% paroxysmal AF, CHADS2Vasc 2.6). Total procedure time was 86 min. Median time to extubation was 9 min (first and third quartile 6-16) after procedure completed, with total anesthesia time of 116 min. On average 370 mL of fluids were given by anesthesia. Only one patient who had heart failure required reintubation with no other anesthesia-related complications seen.

CONCLUSION

Our GA protocol was specifically designed for AF ablation. It was safe and led to efficient recovery and extubation times. It maximizes laboratory utilization time without compromising safety.

Impact of single versus double transseptal puncture on outcome and complications in pulmonary vein isolation procedures

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to analyze the impact of single versus double transseptal puncture (TSP) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively included in the AF ablation registry and were analyzed according to single versus double TSP.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients (female 35%, persistent AF 67%) undergoing AF ablation between 01/2014 and 09/2014 were included. Single TSP was performed in 202 (42%) patients, double TSP in 276 (58%) patients. Age, gender, body mass index, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left ventricular ejection fraction and operator experience (experienced operator defined as ≥ 5 years of experience in invasive electrophysiology) were equally distributed between the two groups. Repeat procedures (re-dos) were more frequently performed using single TSP access (p < 0.001). Left atrial (LA) diameter was larger in patients with double TSP (p = 0.001). Procedure duration in single TSP was identical to double TSP procedures (p = 0.823). Radiation duration was similar between the two groups (p = 0.217). There were 49 (10%) patients with complications after catheter ablation. There were no differences between complication rates and TSP type (p = 0.555). Similarly, recurrence rates were comparable between both TSP groups (p = 0.788).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no clear benefit of single or double TSP in AF ablation.

Relevance of esophageal position and temperature on thermal injuries and rhythm outcome in atrial fibrillation ablations

BACKGROUND

Thermolesions are a dangerous complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to assess the reasons for thermolesions and the effect of esophageal position on recurrences.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients undergoing AF catheter ablation at Heart Center Leipzig between January and September 2014. We collected data of esophagus localization, temperature, endoscopy, and follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 645 patients into analyses. A total of 626 (97.2%) received a temperature probe. Esophageal position was categorized: (A) behind left pulmonary veins, (B) left ostial, (C) in the middle of left atrium, (D) right ostial, and (E) behind right pulmonary veins. The most frequent esophageal position was B-C (n = 201, 32.1%), followed by B (n = 161, 25.7%), and C (n = 147, 23.5%). The temperature was highest in A-B positions (42.04°C) and in D-E positions (41.70°C). There was a significant correlation between the endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) and the esophageal position (r² = -.115, P = .004) and the esophageal temperature (r² = .162, P = .000), but not with body mass index (BMI) (r² = -.016, P = .688). Additional substrate modification in the left atrium resulted in significantly higher esophageal temperatures (P < .001) and more frequent EDEL (P = .049). An EDEL was found in 15 patients (2.3% of all patients, 5.6% of patients receiving endoscopy). Of those, the median esophageal temperature was 41.8°C (interquartile range [IQR]: 41.2-42.4). Neither esophageal position nor temperature during ablation was associated with arrhythmia recurrences (both P > .400).

CONCLUSIONS

EDEL depended on the esophageal position and temperature, but not on BMI. Esophageal position and intraluminal temperature during ablation had no effect on recurrences.

Predictive Factors and Safety of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Combination With Propofol Deep Sedation in Left Atrial Ablation Procedures

Catheter ablation is nowadays the core treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Propofol infusion sedation is an accepted safety strategy; however, respiratory depression with respiratory variations is frequent. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) added to deep sedation could improve procedural safety and success. We sought to assess the predictive factors and safety of NIV in combination to propofol deep sedation in left atrial ablation procedures. Procedural data from 252 consecutive patients who underwent left atrial ablation (166 [66%] persistent, 86 [34%] for paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. Sedation with 1% propofol was used in all procedures and controlled by electrophysiologists. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed regularly during the procedure. NIV was indicated for respiratory depression with pH <7.25 and pCO₂ >50 mm Hg or agitated patient with the need for more profound sedation. No patient needed endotracheal intubation, and no procedure was abandoned due to adverse effects of sedation. NIV was used in 25 patients (10%). Predictive factors for the use of NIV were high-dose propofol sedation (p = 0.010), persistent AF (p = 0.029), prolonged procedure time (p = 0.006), increased body mass index (p = 0.008) and presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; p <0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, OSA was an independent factor for NIV use (p = 0.016). In conclusion, propofol deep sedation for patients who underwent left atrial ablation is safe. Adding NIV in high-risk patients (i.e., OSA, high body mass index, and lengthy procedure duration) provides better respiratory homeostasis and could impact long-term procedure results.

Deep sedation for transvenous lead extraction: a large single-centre experience

Aims

Transvenous lead extraction for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is of growing importance. Nevertheless, the optimal anaesthetic approach, general anaesthesia vs. deep sedation (DS), remains unresolved. We describe our tertiary centre experience of the feasibility and safety of DS.

Methods and results

Extraction procedures were performed in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory by two experienced electrophysiologists. We used intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam, and Propofol for DS. A stepwise approach with locking stylets, dilator sheaths, and mechanical sheaths via subclavian, femoral, or internal jugular venous access was utilized. Patient characteristics and procedural data were collected. Logistic regression models were used to identify parameters associated with sedation-related complications. Extraction of 476 leads (dwelling time/patient 88 ± 49 months, 30% ICD leads) was performed in 220 patients (64 ± 17 years, 80% male). Deep sedation was initiated with bolus administration of Fentanyl, Midazolam, and Propofol; mean doses 0.34 ± 0.12 μg/kg, 24.3 ± 6.8 μg/kg, and 0.26 ± 0.13 mg/kg, respectively. Deep sedation was maintained with continuous Propofol infusion (initial dose 3.7 ± 1.1 mg/kg/h; subsequently increased to 4.7 ± 1.2 mg/kg/h with 3.9 ± 2.6 adjustments) and boluses of Midazolam and Fentanyl as indicated. Sedation-related episodes of hypotension, requiring vasopressors, and hypoxia, requiring additional airway management, occurred in 25 (11.4%) and 5 (2.3%) patients, respectively. These were managed without adverse consequences. Five patients (2.3%) experienced major intraprocedural complications; there were no procedure-related deaths. All of our logistic regression models indicated intraprocedural support was associated with administration higher Fentanyl doses.

Conclusion

Transvenous lead extraction under DS in the EP laboratory is a safe procedure with high success rates when performed by experienced staff.

Evaluation of a simple technique aiming at optimizing point-by-point isolation of the left pulmonary veins: a randomized study

Aims

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a simple technique for stabilizing the ablation catheter during anterior pulmonary vein (PV) encirclement in patients ablated for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This consisted of bending the ablation catheter in the left atrium, creating a loop that was cautiously advanced together with the long sheath at the ostium and then within the left superior PV. The curve was then progressively released to reach a stable contact with the anterior part of the left PVs.

Methods and results

Eighty consecutive patients (age 64 ± 11 years, left atrial diameter 43 ± 8 mm) undergoing ‘CLOSE’-guided PV isolation were prospectively randomized into two groups depending on whether the loop technique was used or not. When using the loop technique, the encirclement of the left PVs was shorter [20 min (interquartile range, IQR 17–24) vs. 26 min (IQR 18–33), P < 0.01] with a high rate of first pass isolation [(100%) vs. (97%), P = 0.9] and adenosine proof isolation [(93%) vs. (95%), P = 0.67]. Most specifically, at the anterior part of the left PVs, there were less dislocations [0 (IQR 0–0) vs. 1 (IQR 0–4), P < 0.001], radiofrequency duration was shorter (272 ± 85 s vs. 378 ± 122 s, P < 0.001), force-time integral was higher [524 gs (IQR 427–687) vs. 398 gs (IQR 354–451), P < 0.001], average contact force was higher [20 g (IQR 13–27) vs. 11g (IQR 9–16), P < 0.001], and impedance drop was higher [12 Ω (IQR 9–19) vs. 10 Ω (IQR 7–14), P < 0.001].

Conclusion

This study describes a simple technique to facilitate catheter stability at the anterior part of the left PVs, resulting in more efficient left PV encirclement without compromising safety.

Sedation in cardiac arrhythmias management

INTRODUCTION

Procedural sedation is of paramount importance for a plethora of electrophysiological procedures. From electrical cardioversion to electrophysiology studies, device implantations, and catheter ablations, intraprocedural sedation and anesthesia have a pivotal role in allowing procedural success while ensuring patient safety and avoiding discomfort. Areas covered: The present review will discuss the current state-of-the-art in sedation and anesthesia during electrical cardioversion, cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, catheter ablation and electrophysiology studies. Specific information will be provided for each procedure in order to reach the core of this important clinical issue, and specific protocols will be compared. The main pro-arrhythmic and anti-arrhythmic effects of the most commonly used sedatives will also be discussed. Expert commentary: According to much recent evidence, the cardiologist can be the only person responsible for sedation administration in many settings, highlighting few safety issues associated with the absence of a dedicated anesthesiologist thus a concomitant reduction in costs. However, many concerns have been raised in allowing non-anesthesiologists to manage sedatives, as adverse events, while rare, could have catastrophic consequences. The present paper will highlight when a cardiologist-directed sedation is considered safe, how it should be performed, and the pros and cons related to this strategy.

Feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia by cardiologists with the support of anesthesiologists during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The optimal methodology for sedation and anesthesia during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has not been well established. We assessed the feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) by cardiologists with support from anesthesiologists during AF ablation and quality of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and single procedure success rate at 12 months.

METHODS

TIVA was performed by cardiologists using IV propofol and fentanyl under controlled ventilation via i-gel™ without neuromuscular blocking drugs in 160 consecutive patients (80 nonparoxysmal) with no anticipated difficult airway or other severe diseases. Anesthesiologists were requested to be on standby during the procedure. The incidence of anesthesia-associated complications and ablation-associated complications were assessed. To evaluate the quality of PVI, the prevalence of acute adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-provoked PV reconnections and late PV reconnections among those requiring a redo procedure was analyzed.

RESULTS

TIVA was successfully completed in 152 patients (95%). In five (3%), we requested help from anesthesiologists, and in three (2%), TIVA was abandoned. No major anesthesia-associated complications were observed. Ablation-associated complications were observed in seven patients (4%). ATP provocation test was performed in 141 patients, and no acute PV reconnections were observed in 134 (95%). Success rates at 12 months were 85% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. Twenty-one of 24 patients with recurrence underwent a redo session, and 18 (86%) had no PV reconnections.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA by cardiologists with support from anesthesiologists during AF ablation may be feasible. The success rate at 12 months was high, and prevalence of acute and late PV reconnection was very low.

Clinical benefits of deep sedation with a supraglottic airway while monitoring the bispectral index during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) under sedation has proven to be a useful strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

To evaluate the clinical benefits of respiratory management using supraglottic airways (SGAs) under deep sedation while monitoring the bispectral (BIS) index during the PVAI and the durations from admission to the catheterization room to starting the radiofrequency energy delivery (Time α), and from starting the radiofrequency energy delivery to completion of the PVAI (Time β), X-ray time, frequency of dislocations of the three-dimensional maps (D3DM), procedure-related complications, and proportion of an AF-free rate 15 months after the PVAI (PAFFR) in patients who received deep sedation without SGAs (Group A: n=48) and those with SGAs (Group B: n=51) were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, Time α (77±3 versus 78±2 min; p=0.816), complications of cardiac tamponade (2% versus 2%; p=0.966), or PAFFR (81% versus 88%; p=0.313) between the two groups. However, the Time β (84±4 versus 67±3; p=0.001), X-ray time (53±2 versus 34±2; p<0.001), and minor complications of nasal bleeding (25% versus 0%; p=0.001) were significantly shorter and lower in Group B than in Group A, in accordance with a reduction in the hypoxia (15% versus 0%; p=0.007) and D3DM (31% versus 8%; p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

These results may demonstrate the clinical benefits of deep sedation with SGAs while monitoring the BIS index without any hypoxia during PVAI in patients with AF.

High Patient Satisfaction with Deep Sedation for Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmia

BACKGROUND

Patients' satisfaction with invasive procedures largely relies on periprocedural perception of pain and discomfort. The necessity for intraprocedural sedation during catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias for technical reasons is widely accepted, but data on patients' experience of pain and satisfaction with the procedural sedation are scarce. We have assessed patients' pain and discomfort during and after the procedure using a standardized questionnaire.

METHODS

One hundred seventeen patients who underwent catheter ablation answered a standardized questionnaire on periprocedural perception of pain and discomfort after different anesthetic protocols with propofol/midazolam with and without additional piritramide and ketamine/midazolam.

RESULTS

Patients report a high level of satisfaction with periprocedural sedation with 83% judging sedation as good or very good. The majority of patients was unconscious of the whole procedure and did not recollect experiencing pain. Procedural pain was reported by 7.7% of the patients and 16% reported adverse effects, e.g., postprocedural nausea and episodes of headache.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study show that deep sedation during catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is generally well tolerated and patients are satisfied with the procedure. Yet, a number of patients reports pain or adverse events. Therefore, studies comparing different sedation strategies should be conducted in order to optimize sedation and analgesia.

Impact of deep sedation on the electrophysiological behavior of pulmonary vein and non-PV firing during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is performed with and without deep sedation, which could affect the arrhythmogenic activity during the procedure. We investigated the impact of sedation on electrophysiological properties in patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation.

METHODS

This study consisted of 255 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (229 males, persistent: 105 patients) who underwent a single-catheter ablation procedure. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the depth of sedation during the procedure: group M (mild sedation with flunitrazepam in 138 patients) and group D (deep sedation with propofol in 117 patients). Peripheral oxygen saturation was continuously monitored via pulse oximetry throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

A spontaneous dissociated pulmonary vein activity after pulmonary vein isolation occurred more frequently in group M than in group D (29.1 vs 15.7%, P < 0.01). Adenosine-induced dormant pulmonary vein conduction was more frequently observed in group M than in group D (19.2 vs 13.0% P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidence of non-pulmonary vein triggers between groups M and D (15.2 vs 11.1%, P = 0.53). The atrial fibrillation recurrence rate following the single procedure did not differ between the two groups (29.0 vs 26.5%, in groups M and D, P = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Although deep sedation reduced the incidence of a dissociated pulmonary vein activity and dormant pulmonary vein conduction following pulmonary vein isolation, it did not affect the recurrence rate for atrial fibrillation after the procedure.

Moderate sedation in cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a retrospective safety analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures can be performed under moderate sedation without the direct involvement of an anaesthetist. However, concerns have been raised over the safety of this approach. This study examines the use of a standardised nurse-led physician-directed sedation protocol for EP procedures to determine the safety of moderate sedation administered by non-anaesthesia personnel who have been trained in sedation techniques.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive EP procedures done under moderate sedation over 12 years at our institution were evaluated. Serious adverse events were defined as (i) procedural death related to sedation; (ii) intubation and ventilation; and (iii) hypotension requiring inotropic support. Reversal of sedation constituted a minor adverse event. Up to 7117 procedures were included. These comprised ablations (55%), devices (43%) and other procedures (2%). A majority of patients were men with a mean age of 61±10 years. 99.98% of procedures were completed successfully without sedation-related serious adverse events. Two patients (0.02%) required anaesthetic support for intubation. Sedation was reversed in 1.2% of procedures with less than 1% requiring reversal because of persistent drop in oxygen saturation, hypoventilation or markedly reduced level of consciousness. There was no significant difference in the patient characteristics, mean doses of sedative agents and procedure types in the group requiring reversal of sedation when compared with the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that nurse-led, physician-directed moderate sedation is safe. Anaesthesia services are not required routinely for invasive cardiac EP procedures and should be available on a need basis.

Airway support using a pediatric intubation tube in adult patients with atrial fibrillation: A simple and unique method to prevent heart movement during catheter ablation under continuous deep sedation

Background

The present study aimed to elucidate the safety and effectiveness of a noble and unique airway management technique in which a pediatric intubation tube is used in adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter ablation (CA) under continuous deep sedation.

Methods

In total, 246 consecutive patients with AF (mean age, 65±10 years; 60 women) underwent CA under dexmedetomidine-based continuous deep sedation. A 4-mm pediatric intubation tube guided by a 10-French intratracheal suction tube was inserted smoothly, and the tip of the tube was located at the base of the epiglottis. The maximum shifting distance of the heart (MSDH) was measured with the 3D mapping system (Ensite NavX system) before and after inserting the pediatric intubation tube.

Results

At baseline, the MSDH of patients under continuous deep sedation was 23±14 mm. The pediatric intubation tube reduced the MSDH to 13±6 mm (mean reduction from baseline, 38.4±21.7%; P<0.0001). In contrast, oxygen saturation was significantly increased from 89±8% to 95±3% (P<0.0001). The mean distance between the nostril and base of the epiglottis was 16.6±0.5 mm. Major periprocedural complications occurred in 9 (3.6%) patients including 3 (1.2%) cardiac tamponade and 6 (2.4%) phrenic nerve injury cases. Larger MSDH (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.25; P=0.007) was a significant predictor of major periprocedural complications. No major airway complications occurred, except in 3 patients (1.2%) who had minor nasal bleeding.

Conclusion

This unique airway management technique using a pediatric intubation tube for CA procedures performed in adult patients with AF under continuous deep sedation was easy, safe, and effective.

Anesthetic management in atrial fibrillation ablation procedure: Adding non-invasive ventilation to deep sedation

Anesthetic management of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation has specific requirements. The feasibility of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) added to deep sedation procedure was evaluated.

Seventy-two patients who underwent ablation procedure were retrospectively revised, performed with (57%) or without (43%) application of NIV (Respironic^® latex-free total face mask connected to Garbin ventilator-Linde Inc.) during deep sedation (Midazolam 0.01–0.02 mg/kg, fentanyl 2.5–5 μg/kg and propofol: bolus dose 1–1.5 mg/kg, maintenance 2–4 mg/kg/h).

In the two groups (NIV vs deep sedation), differences were detected in intraprocedural (pH 7.37 ± 0.05 vs 7.32 ± 0.05, p = 0.001; PaO₂ 117.10 ± 27.25 vs 148.17 ± 45.29, p = 0.004; PaCO₂ 43.37 ± 6.91 vs 49.33 ± 7.34, p = 0.002) and in percentage variation with respect to basal values (pH −0.52 ± 0.83 vs −1.44 ± 0.87, p = 0.002; PaCO₂ 7.21 ± 15.55 vs 34.91 ± 25.76, p = 0.001) of arterial blood gas parameters. Two episodes of respiratory complications, treated with application of NIV, were reported in deep sedation procedure. Endotracheal intubation was not necessary in any case. Adverse events related to electrophysiological procedures and recurrence of atrial fibrillation were recorded, respectively, in 36% and 29% of cases.

NIV proved to be feasible in this context and maintained better respiratory homeostasis and better arterial blood gas balance when added to deep sedation.

Initial Experience With Ultra High-Density Mapping of Human Right Atria

INTRODUCTION

Recently, an automatic, high-resolution mapping system has been presented to accurately and quickly identify right atrial geometry and activation patterns in animals, but human data are lacking. This study aims to assess the clinical feasibility and accuracy of high-density electroanatomical mapping of various RA arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electroanatomical maps of the RA (35 partial and 24 complete) were created in 23 patients using a novel mini-basket catheter with 64 electrodes and automatic electrogram annotation. Median acquisition time was 6:43 minutes (0:39-23:05 minutes) with shorter times for partial (4.03 ± 4.13 minutes) than for complete maps (9.41 ± 4.92 minutes). During mapping 3,236 (710-16,306) data points were automatically annotated without manual correction. Maps obtained during sinus rhythm created geometry consistent with CT imaging and demonstrated activation originating at the middle to superior crista terminalis, while maps during CS pacing showed right atrial activation beginning at the infero-septal region. Activation patterns were consistent with cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (n = 4), complex reentry tachycardia (n = 1), or ectopic atrial tachycardia (n = 2). His bundle and fractionated potentials in the slow pathway region were automatically detected in all patients. Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (n = 9), the atrio-ventricular node (n = 2), atrial ectopy (n = 2), and the slow pathway (n = 3) was successfully and safely performed.

CONCLUSIONS

RA mapping with this automatic high-density mapping system is fast, feasible, and safe. It is possible to reproducibly identify propagation of atrial activation during sinus rhythm, various tachycardias, and also complex reentrant arrhythmias.