Transseptal puncture for left atrial ablation: risk factors for cardiac tamponade and a proposed causative classification system

Aims

Cardiac tamponade is a high morbidity complication of transseptal puncture (TSP). We examined the associations of TSP‐related cardiac tamponade (TRCT) for all patients undergoing left atrial ablation at our center from 2016 to 2020.

Methods and Results

Patient and procedural variables were extracted retrospectively. Cases of cardiac tamponade were scrutinized to adjudicate TSP culpability. Adjusted multivariate analysis examined predictors of TRCT. A total of 3239 consecutive TSPs were performed; cardiac tamponade occurred in 51 patients (incidence: 1.6%) and was adjudicated as TSP‐related in 35 (incidence: 1.1%; 68.6% of all tamponades). Patients of above‐median age [odds ratio (OR): 2.4 (1.19–4.2), p = .006] and those undergoing re‐do procedures [OR: 1.95 (1.29–3.43, p = .042] were at higher risk of TRCT. Of the operator‐dependent variables, choice of transseptal needle (Endrys vs. Brockenbrough, p > .1) or puncture sheath (Swartz vs. Mullins vs. Agilis vs. Vizigo vs. Cryosheath, all p > .1) did not predict TRCT. Adjusting for operator, equipment and demographics, failure to cross the septum first pass increased TRCT risk [OR: 4.42 (2.45–8.2), p = .001], whilst top quartile operator experience [OR: 0.4 (0.17–0.85), p = .002], transoesophageal echocardiogram [TOE prevalence: 26%, OR: 0.51 (0.11–0.94), p = .023], and use of the SafeSept transseptal guidewire [OR: 0.22 (0.08–0.62), p = .001] reduced TRCT risk. An increase in transseptal guidewire use over time (2016: 15.6%, 2020: 60.2%) correlated with an annual reduction in TRCT (R² = 0.72, p < .001) and was associated with a relative risk reduction of 70%.

Conclusions

During left atrial ablation, the risk of TRCT was reduced by operator experience, TOE‐guidance, and use of a transseptal guidewire, and was increased by patient age, re‐do procedures, and failure to cross the septum first pass.

P504VT ablation outcomes and predictors in a UK population- validating existing predictors and novel markers

Background

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) can reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden and registry data suggests an improvement in mortality. However, there is significant heterogeneity in patient morbidity and VT phenotype. A risk prediction model derived from observational data has suggested pre-procedural left ventricular (LV) function, age and underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy are associated with greater post-procedural mortality. Validation of proposed factors in clinical practice is required to facilitate comprehensive pre-procedural risk stratification and inform decision making.

Purpose

To determine whether proposed pre-procedural predictors of mortality after VTCA are valid in a UK population and explore any association with other predictors.

Method

Patients undergoing VTCA at a tertiary electrophysiology centre between 06/07/16 and 31/07/19 were included. Pre-specified characteristics and mortality follow-up data were analysed from electronic health records. Cox regression analysis was undertaken to determine association with mortality.

Results

161 patients with mean age of 63 ±15.9 years underwent VTCA of whom 133 (83%) were male. During the follow-up  period (16 months, 13-24; median, 1st-3rd quartile) 16 patients died. No deaths occured in the 27 (16%) patients with structurally normal hearts. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage III-IV (HR 14.73 [4.9-44.4]), LV ejection fraction &lt;35% (HR 7.13 [1.59-31.88]), underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy (HR 6.17 [1.37-27.85]), LV internal diameter (LVID) (1.08 [1.02-1.15]) and age (HR 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) were associated with significantly greater mortality risk (Table 1) (Figure 1).

Conclusion

Proposed risk stratifying factors are validated in our UK centre’s experience. Additionally, CKD and baseline LVID appear to be associated with mortality in our population and warrant further study.

Risk factor Hazard ratio Lower confidence interval Upper confidence interval P-value Atrial fibrillation (yes/no) 0.14 0.02 1.11 0.06 Age (years) 1.08 1.02 1.14 &lt;0.01 Diabetes (yes/no) 2.43 0.85 6.92 0.10 Chronic kidney disease (yes/no) 14.73 4.88 44.41 &lt;0.01 Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (yes/no) 6.17 1.37 27.85 0.02 LV EF &lt;35% (yes/no) 7.13 1.59 31.88 &lt;0.01 LV internal diameter (mm) 1.08 1.02 1.15 &lt;0.01 Procedural urgency (urgent/elective) 1.12 0.57 2.20 0.75 Table 1: Association between baseline risk factors and mortality risk after VT catheter ablation

Abstract Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier survival curves

Impact of attributed audit on procedural performance in cardiac electrophysiology catheter laboratory

PURPOSE

Audit has played a key role in monitoring and improving clinical practice. However, audit often fails to drive change as summative institutional data alone may be insufficient to do so. We hypothesised that the practice of attributed audit, wherein each individual's procedural performance is presented will have a greater impact on clinical practice. This hypothesis was tested in an observational study evaluating improvement in fluoroscopy times for AF ablation.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of fluoroscopy times in AF ablations at the Barts Heart Centre (BHC) from 2012-2017. Fluoroscopy times were compared pre- and post- the introduction of attributed audit in 2012 at St Bartholomew's Hospital (SBH). In order to test the hypothesis, this concept was introduced to a second group of experienced operators from the Heart Hospital (HH) as part of a merger of the two institutions in 2015 and change in fluoroscopy times recorded.

RESULTS

A significant drop in fluoroscopy times (33.3 ± 9.14 to 8.95 ± 2.50, p < 0.0001) from 2012-2014 was noted after the introduction of attributed audit. At the time of merger, a significant difference in fluoroscopy times between operators from the two centres was seen in 2015. Each operator's procedural performance was shared openly at the audit meeting. Subsequent audits showed a steady decrease in fluoroscopy times for each operator with the fluoroscopy time (min, mean±SD) decreasing from 13.29 ± 7.3 in 2015 to 8.84 ± 4.8 (p < 0.0001) in 2017 across the entire group.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic improvement in fluoroscopy times for AF ablation procedures was noted byevaluating individual operators' performance. Attributing data to physicians in attributed audit can promptsignificant improvement and hence should be adopted in clinical practice.

Moderate sedation in cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a retrospective safety analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures can be performed under moderate sedation without the direct involvement of an anaesthetist. However, concerns have been raised over the safety of this approach. This study examines the use of a standardised nurse-led physician-directed sedation protocol for EP procedures to determine the safety of moderate sedation administered by non-anaesthesia personnel who have been trained in sedation techniques.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive EP procedures done under moderate sedation over 12 years at our institution were evaluated. Serious adverse events were defined as (i) procedural death related to sedation; (ii) intubation and ventilation; and (iii) hypotension requiring inotropic support. Reversal of sedation constituted a minor adverse event. Up to 7117 procedures were included. These comprised ablations (55%), devices (43%) and other procedures (2%). A majority of patients were men with a mean age of 61±10 years. 99.98% of procedures were completed successfully without sedation-related serious adverse events. Two patients (0.02%) required anaesthetic support for intubation. Sedation was reversed in 1.2% of procedures with less than 1% requiring reversal because of persistent drop in oxygen saturation, hypoventilation or markedly reduced level of consciousness. There was no significant difference in the patient characteristics, mean doses of sedative agents and procedure types in the group requiring reversal of sedation when compared with the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that nurse-led, physician-directed moderate sedation is safe. Anaesthesia services are not required routinely for invasive cardiac EP procedures and should be available on a need basis.

Percutaneous lead extraction and venous recanalisation using spectranetics tight rail: A single centre experience

Aims

Despite advances in lead extraction tools, percutaneous lead extraction remains a complex procedure associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Moreover, no standards or directives exist to guide physicians in the choice of their extraction tool or approach and all operators tend to have their own preferred method. The reporting of outcomes with existing and newly emerging extraction technology is therefore encouraged.

Methods and results

Four lead extraction procedures using the new spectranetics tight rail rotating dilator sheath are described here. All patients (n = 3) had chronically implanted leads (mean duration = 11.7 years) and the pre-procedure venogram showed occluded left subclavian and brachiocephalic veins with extensive collateralisation. All leads were extracted successfully using this newly designed rotating dilator sheath and vascular access was also retained by venous recanalisation using this kit. One patient required a second extraction procedure at four weeks due to diaphragmatic twitch without macroscopic coronary sinus (CS) lead displacement. This was replaced with a transseptal LV lead. There were no other procedure related complications and all patients remained well with good lead parameters at three months follow-up.

Conclusion

The use of this new tight rail extraction tool appears safe and effective in chronically implanted leads. Moreover, it helps to preserve the vascular access by recanalisation of long tortuous occlusions. Its use across various centres and larger number of patients will be required to confirm our results.

Long-term efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: impact of additional targeting of fractionated electrograms

OBJECTIVES

To investigate long-term efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of ablating complex or fractionated electrograms (CFEs) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in persistent AF (PeAF).

METHODS

Consecutive cases from 2002-2007 were analysed. All the patients underwent a wide-area circumferential ablation with confirmation of electrical isolation. For PeAF, linear lesions were added, with additional targeting of CFE from 2005. Data were collected in a prospective database. Attempts were made to contact all patients for follow-up.

RESULTS

285 patients underwent 530 procedures. The mean (SD) age was 57 (11) years, 75% were male, 20% had structural heart disease and 53% had paroxysmal AF (PAF). The mean number of procedures was 1.9 per patient (1.7 for PAF and 2.0 for PeAF). Procedural complications included stroke or transient ischemic attack in 0.6% and pericardial effusion requiring drainage in 1.7%. During 2.7 years (0.2 to 7.4 years) of follow-up from the last procedure, there were seven deaths (unrelated to their ablation or AF) and three strokes or transient ischemic attack (0.3% per year). Freedom from AF/atrial tachyarrhythmia was 86% for PAF and 68% for PeAF. Late recurrence was 3 per 100 years of follow-up after >3 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that CFE ablation improved the outcome for PeAF after the first cluster of procedures (p=0.049), with a trend towards improved final outcome (p=0.130).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term freedom from AF is achievable in most patients with PAF and PeAF with low rates of late recurrence. Additional targeting of CFE improves outcome for PeAF. Late adverse events including stroke are few.