Emergency pacemaker implantation in nonagenarians with complete heart block: is single chamber pacing sufficient?

Background

In ambulatory patients with complete heart block and preserved sinus node activity (CHBs), dual chamber pacing confers well-established physiological benefits versus single chamber pacing. There is limited evidence as to whether these benefits extend to very frail patients, especially those over 90 years of age.

Purpose

In nonagenarians presenting with emergent CHBs from 2016–2019, we compared the clinical characteristics of patients selected for single versus dual chamber pacemakers (PPM), and evaluated the symptomatic and prognostic implications of these devices.

Methods

Baseline characteristics were discerned from electronic records, and physiological data extracted from serial PPM interrogations. Frailty was quantified according to the Rockwood clinical frailty scale (1–9). Cause of death was provided by the patients' General Practitioner. Cox proportional hazards analysis (HR, 95% CI) examined associations with all-cause mortality and death from congestive cardiac failure (CCF).

Results

168 consecutive patients were included (44.3% Male, Median age: 91 (2) years) and followed-up for 26.9±14.6 months. 22 patients (13.1%) were implanted with single chamber pacemakers (all programmed VVIR); when compared with patients receiving dual chamber devices, these patients had similar median age (93 (3) versus 91 (2) years, p=0.15) and LV systolic function (LVEF: 49.2% ±9.7 versus 50.7% ±10.1, p=0.71), but were more frail (Rockwood scale: 5.2±1.8 versus 4.3±1.1, p=0.004) and more likely to have severe cognitive impairment (27.3% versus 9.2%, p=0.018). Post implant, patients who received single chamber devices had higher average respiratory rates (21.3±2.4 breaths per minute versus 17.5±2.6 breaths per minute, p=0.002), lower average heart rates (65.5±10.1 bpm versus 71.9±8.6 bpm, p=0.002), and lower daily activity levels (0.57±0.3 hours of activity versus 1.5±1.1 hours of activity, p=0.016) than those with dual chamber devices. Death from CCF was more common in patients receiving single chamber devices (40.9% versus 6.2%, log rank p<0.0001); this association persisted when adjusting for age, frailty and cognitive impairment (adjusted HR: 6.2 (2.2–17.3, p=0.0005). However, in this age group, single chamber pacing was not independently associated with all-cause mortality when compared with dual chamber pacing (adjusted HR: 1.9 (0.95–3.6, p=0.07).

Conclusions

In nonagenarians with CHBs, dual chamber pacing was associated with improved symptomatic outcomes and a reduced risk of death from CCF, but did not affect all-cause mortality when compared with single chamber pacing.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: prognostic value of the PADIT score and its cost-utility implications for antimicrobial envelope use in the United Kingdom

Background

The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections is rising.

Purpose

We examined the factors associated with CIED infection, assessed the prognostic power of the PADIT risk score, and modelled the cost-utility of selective TYRX antimicrobial envelope use for preventing CIED infections.

Methods

Data were extracted from 2016 to 2019, and included all de novo implants, generator changes and lead interventions for transvenous CIEDs at a high-volume UK centre. CIED infection was defined as hospitalisation for device infection within 12 months of a procedure. Cost-utility analysis was informed by standardised tariffs, and quality adjusted life year (QALY) and efficacy data was extrapolated from analysis of the WRAP-IT trial.

Results

6,035 patients underwent 7,383 procedures; CIED infection occurred in 59 individuals (0.8%). In addition to the constituents of the PADIT score, lead extraction (HR 3.3 (1.9–6.1), p<0.0001), C-reactive protein >50mg/l (HR 3.0 (1.4–6.4), p=0.005), re-intervention within two years (HR 10.1 (5.6–17.9), p<0.0001), and procedure duration over two hours (HR 2.6 (1.6–4.1), p=0.001) were independent predictors of infection. Increased PADIT score was strongly associated with infection (AUC: 0.82, HR per point increase: 1.36 (1.27–1.47), p<0.0001). A cost-utility model assigning TYRX envelopes to patients with PADIT scores ≥6 predicted a reduction in infections (number needed to treat: 72) and a cost per QALY gained within the UK's (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold (£25,107).

Conclusions

The PADIT score was a powerful predictor of CIED infections in a heterogeneous population,and may facilitate cost-effective TYRX envelope allocation in selected high-risk patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Transseptal puncture for left atrial ablation: risk factors for cardiac tamponade and a proposed causative classification system

Background

Cardiac tamponade is a high morbidity complication of transseptal puncture (TSP).

Purpose

We examined the associations of TSP-related cardiac tamponade (TRCT) for all patients undergoing left atrial ablation at our centre from 2016–2020.

Methods

Patient and procedural variables were extracted retrospectively. Cases of cardiac tamponade were scrutinised to adjudicate TSP culpability. Adjusted multivariate analysis examined predictors of TRCT.

Results

3,239 consecutive TSPs were performed; cardiac tamponade occurred in 51 patients (incidence: 1.6%) and was adjudicated as TSP-related in 35 (incidence: 1.1%; 68.6% of all tamponades). Patients of above-median age (OR 2.4 (1.19–4.2), p=0.006) and those undergoing re-do procedures (OR 1.95 (1.29–3.43, p=0.042) were at higher risk of TRCT. Of the operator-dependent variables, choice of transseptal needle (Endrys vs Brockenbrough, p>0.1) or puncture sheath (Swartz vs Mullins vs Agilis vs Vizigo vs Cryosheath, all p>0.1) did not predict TRCT. Adjusting for operator, equipment and demographics, failure to cross the septum first pass increased TRCT risk (OR 4.42 (2.45–8.2), p=0.001), whilst top quartile operator experience (OR 0.4 (0.17–0.85, p=0.002), transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE prevalence: 26%, OR 0.51 (0.11–0.94), p=0.023), and use of the SafeSept guidewire (OR 0.22 (0.08–0.62), p=0.001) reduced TRCT risk. An increase in SafeSept wire use over time (2016: 15.6%, 2020: 60.2%) correlated with an annual reduction in TRCT (R2=0.72, p<0.001) and was associated with a relative risk reduction of 70%.

Conclusions

During left atrial ablation, the independent predictors of TRCT were patient age, re-do procedure, operator experience, unsuccessful first pass, TOE-guidance, and use of the SafeSept wire. A novel classification system for the causes of cardiac tamponade is proposed (table 1); this may be of interest to clinical trialists or auditors evaluating patient safety.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

1051 EMERGENCY PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION IN NONAGENARIANS: IMPACT OF FRAILTY ON OPERATOR DECISION-MAKING AND PATIENT OUTCOMES

Introduction

Complete heart block (CHB) is a time-critical emergency. In frail patients with CHB, the absence of test results or a comprehensive history can challenge operator decision-making; in particular, minimal data exists as to the prognostic impact of single versus dual chamber pacing in this group. In patients over 90 years of age presenting with CHB, we examined the prognostic value of parameters obtained from bedside examination, and analysed the impact of single versus dual chamber pacemakers on mortality.

Method

Data were extracted from 2016–2019. Bedside covariates were age, sex, previous cardiac surgery, atrial rhythm, LV systolic function, syncope at presentation, QRS duration, and Rockwood frailty score. Cox-proportional hazards regression examined associations with all-cause mortality and cardiac death, determined from electronic records and death certificates (adjusted HR, 95% CI).

Results

205 patients were included (age 92.3 ± 2.3 years, 45.4% male). Mortality was 13.8% at 90 days and 27.2% at 27.1 ± 16.7 months. The independent predictors of mortality were pre-procedural QRS duration >130 ms (HR 2.4 (1.4–4.1) p = 0.001), age (HR 1.07 (1.02–1.15) p = 0.004), AF (HR 2.0 (1.1–3.6) p = 0.02), and Rockwood score (HR 1.2 (1.02–2.6), p = 0.043). Sex, syncope at presentation, LV function or previous cardiac surgery did not predict mortality (all p > 0.1). In a subset of 168 patients without AF, 30 (17.8%) received single chamber pacemakers. Whilst these patients were more frail than those receiving dual chamber pacemakers (Rockwood scores: 5.2 ± 1.7 vs 4.3 ± 1.1, p = 0.025), implantation of a single chamber pacemaker was independently associated with cardiac death when adjusting for frailty and co-morbidities (HR 6 (1.4–26.4), p = 0.018).

Conclusion

Nonagenarians undergoing emergency pacemaker implantation have a reasonable prognosis. Data ascertained at the bedside can help predict survival, however—when adjusting for frailty and co-morbidities—dual chamber pacing may confer an independent mortality benefit over single chamber pacing in this group.

Transseptal puncture for left atrial ablation: risk factors for cardiac tamponade and a proposed causative classification system

Aims

Cardiac tamponade is a high morbidity complication of transseptal puncture (TSP). We examined the associations of TSP‐related cardiac tamponade (TRCT) for all patients undergoing left atrial ablation at our center from 2016 to 2020.

Methods and Results

Patient and procedural variables were extracted retrospectively. Cases of cardiac tamponade were scrutinized to adjudicate TSP culpability. Adjusted multivariate analysis examined predictors of TRCT. A total of 3239 consecutive TSPs were performed; cardiac tamponade occurred in 51 patients (incidence: 1.6%) and was adjudicated as TSP‐related in 35 (incidence: 1.1%; 68.6% of all tamponades). Patients of above‐median age [odds ratio (OR): 2.4 (1.19–4.2), p = .006] and those undergoing re‐do procedures [OR: 1.95 (1.29–3.43, p = .042] were at higher risk of TRCT. Of the operator‐dependent variables, choice of transseptal needle (Endrys vs. Brockenbrough, p > .1) or puncture sheath (Swartz vs. Mullins vs. Agilis vs. Vizigo vs. Cryosheath, all p > .1) did not predict TRCT. Adjusting for operator, equipment and demographics, failure to cross the septum first pass increased TRCT risk [OR: 4.42 (2.45–8.2), p = .001], whilst top quartile operator experience [OR: 0.4 (0.17–0.85), p = .002], transoesophageal echocardiogram [TOE prevalence: 26%, OR: 0.51 (0.11–0.94), p = .023], and use of the SafeSept transseptal guidewire [OR: 0.22 (0.08–0.62), p = .001] reduced TRCT risk. An increase in transseptal guidewire use over time (2016: 15.6%, 2020: 60.2%) correlated with an annual reduction in TRCT (R² = 0.72, p < .001) and was associated with a relative risk reduction of 70%.

Conclusions

During left atrial ablation, the risk of TRCT was reduced by operator experience, TOE‐guidance, and use of a transseptal guidewire, and was increased by patient age, re‐do procedures, and failure to cross the septum first pass.

Evidence for non-communicable diseases: analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification

INTRODUCTION

Prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing globally, with the greatest projected increases in low-income and middle-income countries. We sought to quantify the proportion of Cochrane evidence relating to NCDs derived from such countries.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane database of systematic reviews for reviews relating to NCDs highlighted in the WHO NCD action plan (cardiovascular, cancers, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases). We excluded reviews at the protocol stage and those that were repeated or had been withdrawn. For each review, two independent researchers extracted data relating to the country of the corresponding author and the number of trials and participants from countries, using the World Bank classification of gross national income per capita.

RESULTS

797 reviews were analysed, with a reported total number of 12 340 trials and 10 937 306 participants. Of the corresponding authors 90% were from high-income countries (41% from the UK). Of the 746 reviews in which at least one trial had met the inclusion criteria, only 55% provided a summary of the country of included trials. Analysis of the 633 reviews in which country of trials could be established revealed that almost 90% of trials and over 80% of participants were from high-income countries. 438 (5%) trials including 1 145 013 (11.7%) participants were undertaken in low-middle income countries. We found that only 13 (0.15%) trials with 982 (0.01%) participants were undertaken in low-income countries. Other than the five Cochrane NCD corresponding authors from South Africa, only one other corresponding author was from Africa (Gambia).

DISCUSSION

The overwhelming body of evidence for NCDs pertains to high-income countries, with only a small number of review authors based in low-income settings. As a consequence, there is an urgent need for research infrastructure and funding for the undertaking of high-quality trials in this area.