Two Versus One Repeat Freeze-Thaw Cycle(s) After Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The ALSTER EXTRA Pilot Study

New Minimally Invasive and Tailor-Made Strategy for Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosage for cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of a reduction in the freezing duration to <180 seconds during CBA guided by the time to the target temperature.

METHODS

This study enrolled 325 consecutive paroxysmal AF patients who underwent CBA. It was a retrospective observational study in a single centre. It compared 164 patients who underwent a tailor-made CBA procedure (group T) with 161 who had a standard CBA procedure (group S). In group T, the freezing duration was reduced to 150 seconds when the temperature reached ≤ -40 °C within 40 seconds. Furthermore, it was reduced to 120 seconds when it reached ≤ -50 °C within 60 seconds. In the other patients, the freezing duration was 180 seconds, except for excessive freezing of ≤ -60 °C and/or emergent situations while monitoring the oesophageal temperature, and for phrenic nerve injury, as in group S.

RESULTS

In group T, 89 patients (83%) underwent CBA with a reduction in the freezing duration. The total freezing time for each pulmonary vein was significantly shorter in group T than group S, and the total procedure time in group T decreased by an average of 4 minutes compared with group S. The rate of requiring additional radio frequency ablation following the CBA was significantly lower in group T than group S. The AF-free survival rate during the follow-up period (median, 366 days) was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of the new CBA strategy were non-inferior to the standard procedure.

Experience and procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the fourth and second generation cryoballoon: The shorter, the better?

BACKGROUND

The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging clinical outcome. The novel fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4) incorporates a 40% shorter distal tip. This design change may translate into an increased rate of PVI real-time signal recording, facilitating an individualized ablation strategy using the time to effect (TTE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were prospectively enrolled. The first 150 consecutive patients underwent CB2 based PVI (CB2 group) and the last 150 consecutive patients were treated with the CB4 (CB4 group). A total of 594/594 (100%, CB4) and 589/594 (99.2%, CB2) pulmonary veins (PVs) were successfully isolated utilizing the CB4 and CB2, respectively (p = .283). The real-time PVI visualization rate was 47% (CB4) and 39% (CB2; p = .005) and the mean freeze cycle duration 200 ± 90 s (CB4) and 228 ± 110 s (CB2; p < .001), respectively. The total procedure time did not differ between the groups (CB4: 64 ± 32 min) and (CB2: 62 ± 29 min, p = .370). No differences in periprocedural complications were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings are seen using the CB4 as compared to CB2, which may facilitate an individualized ablation strategy using the TTE.

Keeping it Simple: Balloon Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy

Atrial fibrillation is a common disease of increasing prevalence. Catheter ablation has evolved into an established therapeutic option that mainly aims to electrically isolate the pulmonary veins from atrial myocardium. The traditional method comprises point-by-point radiofrequency current ablation guided by electroanatomical mapping and has proven to be effective and safe in experienced hands. However, this approach is technically highly demanding and associated with a long learning curve, limiting its widespread utilization. To address these shortcomings, simplified ablation tools for pulmonary vein isolation are needed. In this context, balloon devices promise to ease the procedure by approaching the entire orifice of a targeted pulmonary vein in a single maneuver. This requires less catheter manipulation in the left atrium and often allows ablation of a large volume of tissue with a single application of ablative energy. Two balloon devices-one using cryoenergy, the other laser energy-have already been established in clinical routine and have demonstrated noninferiority when compared with radiofrequency ablation in large randomized trials. More balloon devices are on the verge of being introduced into clinical practice and bear the potential to expand the interventional electrophysiologist's armamentarium when treating atrial fibrillation. The authors review the use of the established balloon devices available for atrial fibrillation ablation and provide a detailed outlook on upcoming balloon technologies, including 3 different balloons utilizing radiofrequency energy as well as a novel cryoballoon.

Cryoablation for atrial fibrillation

Cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation has established itself as an effective and efficient modality for achieving pulmonary vein isolation. Over the past 13 years more than 100,000 Cryoballoon ablation procedures have been performed with the first to fourth generation cryoballoons. Over that time there have been significant advances in our understanding regarding the optimal procedural techniques. The purpose of this "topic in review" is to focus on the practical aspects of performing a Cryoballoon ablation procedure, within the context of the contemporary literature. Specifically there is a focus on how contemporary studies can inform clinical decision making and ensure operators are able to perform a safe and effective procedure.

Impact of cryoballoon applications on lesion gaps detected by magnetic resonance after pulmonary vein isolation

INTRODUCTION

Ablation with second-generation cryoballoon technology evolves as an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency for atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Nevertheless, the optimal freezing strategy remains unknown. Our objective was to identify the procedural cryoablation parameters predicting successful peri-pulmonary vein (PV) lesions by directly analyzing Postablation gaps in late-gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-nine consecutive patients (196 PVs) undergoing ablation with second-generation cryoballoon at our center were included. The number and duration of cryoballoon application to achieve PV isolation were left to operator discretion. Gap number and length were quantified in all patients with a LGE-CMR performed 3 months postablation. Application time (420 ± 217 seconds), number of applications (2.1 ± 1.2), application time after electrical isolation (311 ± 194 seconds) and minimum temperature (-45.8 ± 6.5°C) were similar in the 4 PVs. Gaps were observed in 148 PVs (76%), averaging 1.3 ± 1 gaps per vein. Gaps were longer and more frequent in the right PVs (91% vs 59% in left PVs, P < .001). Neither the number, total duration of applications, nor postisolation application time predicted relative length or number of gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

After successful PV isolation was achieved in patients undergoing cryoablation, increasing the number of applications, the total application time or application time postisolation did not result in a reduction in the number or the relative length of gaps.

Long-term impact of a bonus freeze on clinical outcome: Analysis of effective and non-effective bonus freezes in cryoballoon ablation

Purpose

Data on bonus freeze characteristics and their impact on complication rates and long-term clinical outcome are limited.

Methods

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a 28 mm 2^nd-generation cryoballoon (CB) was performed in 169 patients (pts). The isolation temperatures, time to isolation and minimal temperatures of the cryoapplications were documented.

Results

The study included 92 pts who received one bonus freeze after PVI in group I and 77 pts who did not receive a bonus freeze in group II. After a mean follow-up time of 19.0±8.6 months in group I and 16.4±7.5 months in group II, 67 of 92 pts (72.8%) and 49 of 75 pts available to follow up (65.3%; p = 0.221) were free of atrial tachyarrhythmia, respectively. Phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 5.4% of the pts in group I (5/92 pts) and 1.3% of the pts in group II (1/77 pts; p = 0.22). Both the mean nadir temperatures of the bonus freezes and mean nadir temperatures of the isolation freezes differed significantly between the recurrent and non-recurrent pts in group I. The predilection sites of the reconduction for both groups were the inferior aspect of the inferior pulmonary veins.

Conclusion

The impact of a bonus freeze on long-term clinical outcome was not significant for two reasons: 1) The necessity of a bonus freeze was low because the long-term clinical success rate without a bonus freeze was high; and 2) the majority of bonus freezes, especially at the predilection sites, such as the inferior PV, appeared to be ineffective.

The quest for durable lesions in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation - technological advances in radiofrequency catheters and balloon devices

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and represents a growing clinical, social and economic challenge. Catheter ablation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation has evolved from an experimental procedure into a widespread therapy and offers a safe and effective treatment option. A prerequisite for durable PVI are transmural and contiguous circumferential lesions around the pulmonary veins. However, electrical reconnection of initially isolated pulmonary veins remains a primary concern and is a dominant factor for arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow up. Areas covered: This article discusses the physiology of lesion formation using radiofrequency-, cryo- or laser- energy for pulmonary vein isolation and provides a detailed review of recent technological advancements in the field of radiofrequency catheters and balloon devices. Finally, future directions and upcoming developments for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are discussed. Expert commentary: Durable conduction block across deployed myocardial lesions is mandatory not only for PVI but for any other cardiac ablation strategy as well. A major improvement urgently expected is the intraprocedural real-time distinction of durable lesions from interposed gaps with only transiently impaired electrical conduction. Furthermore, a simplification of ablation tools used for PVI is required to reduce the high technical complexity of the procedure.

Single freeze strategy with the second- generation cryballoon for atrial fibrillation: a multicenter international retrospective analysis in a large cohort of patients

PURPOSE

The second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has proven to be highly effective in achieving freedom from atrial fibrillation; nonetheless, the ideal number and duration of freezing cycles is still a matter of debate. We investigated the acute success, procedural complications, and clinical outcome of a single freeze strategy using the CB-A in a large, retrospective, international multicenter study.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and September 2015, 818 consecutive patients (58 ± 12 years, 68% males) with drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent a CB-A using a single freeze strategy were taken into consideration for our analysis.

RESULTS

Paroxysmal AF was documented in 74.1% of the patients, while 25.9% presented with persistent AF. Additional freezes were needed in a mean 1.4 veins per patient. 0.2% of the patients experienced persistent PNP that was still documented at the last follow-up. After a median follow-up of 14 ± 8 months, taking into consideration a blanking period (BP) of 3 months, 692 patients (84.6%) were free from arrhythmia recurrence. After a single procedure, AF recurrence during BP and persistent AF were identified as predictors of clinical recurrence after BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Single freeze CB-A ablation is effective in treating drug-resistant AF and affords freedom from arrhythmia recurrences in 84.6% of patients during a 14-month follow-up. Persistent AF and recurrence during BP are predictors of arrhythmia recurrences.

Bonus vs No Bonus Cryoballoon Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Aims

To evaluate the benefit of Bonus freeze using second generation cryoballoon after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

Methods

A bonus freeze is performed after proven pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) as standard. In the current study, no additional freeze (No Bonus) after PVI was compared with additional freeze (Bonus) after PVI using second generation cryoballoon.

Results

A total of 136 patients (mean age 58 ± 13 years, 76 male) were included. No Bonus and Bonus groups had 56 and 80 patients, respectively. Follow-up electrocardiography and Holter monitoring were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, and biannually thereafter. The PVI rate was similar after the initial ablation (82% in No Bonus group, 80% in Bonus group, p>0.05) and, at the end of the procedure (99% in No Bonus group and 99% in Bonus group, p>0.05). The median procedure and fluoroscopy times in No Bonus group were 67 (60-74) minutes and 13 (10-15) minutes, which were significantly shorter than the median durations, 85 (76-90) minutes and 17 (15-21) minutes in Bonus group, respectively (all p<0.001). Phrenic nerve palsy was observed less frequently in No Bonus group compared to Bonus group (1 patient (2%) vs. 5 patients (6%), respectively) without statistically significant difference. During a median follow-up of 13 (11-15) months, the rates of patients free from AF were 82% in No Bonus group and 84% in Bonus group, respectively (p>0.05).

Conclusions

The rate of sinus rhythm at 18 months was similar in patients with PAF who received bonus cryoablation vs patients who did not receive bonus cryoablation.

What have we learned of ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation?

Atrial fibrillation is a widespread disease of growing clinical, economic and social importance. Interventional therapy for atrial fibrillation offers encouraging results, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as the established cornerstone. Yet, the challenge to create durable transmural lesions remains, leading to recurrence of atrial fibrillation in long-term follow-up even after multiple ablation procedures in 20% of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and approximately 50% with persistent atrial fibrillation. To overcome these limitations, innovative tools such as the cryoballoon and contact force catheters have been introduced and have demonstrated their potential for safe and effective PVI. Furthermore, advanced pharmacological and pacing manoeuvres enhance evaluation of conduction block in PVI.

MRI Reconstructions of Human Phrenic Nerve Anatomy and Computational Modeling of Cryoballoon Ablative Therapy

The primary goal of this computational modeling study was to better quantify the relative distance of the phrenic nerves to areas where cryoballoon ablations may be applied within the left atria. Phrenic nerve injury can be a significant complication of applied ablative therapies for treatment of drug refractory atrial fibrillation. To date, published reports suggest that such injuries may occur more frequently in cryoballoon ablations than in radiofrequency therapies. Ten human heart-lung blocs were prepared in an end-diastolic state, scanned with MRI, and analyzed using Mimics software as a means to make anatomical measurements. Next, generated computer models of ArticFront cryoballoons (23, 28 mm) were mated with reconstructed pulmonary vein ostias to determine relative distances between the phrenic nerves and projected balloon placements, simulating pulmonary vein isolation. The effects of deep seating balloons were also investigated. Interestingly, the relative anatomical differences in placement of 23 and 28 mm cryoballoons were quite small, e.g., the determined difference between mid spline distance to the phrenic nerves between the two cryoballoon sizes was only 1.7 ± 1.2 mm. Furthermore, the right phrenic nerves were commonly closer to the pulmonary veins than the left, and surprisingly tips of balloons were further from the nerves, yet balloon size choice did not significantly alter calculated distance to the nerves. Such computational modeling is considered as a useful tool for both clinicians and device designers to better understand these associated anatomies that, in turn, may lead to optimization of therapeutic treatments.

Balloon Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Therapy

Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established treatment option for symptomatic patients refractory to antiarrhythmic medication. In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation can be offered as first-line therapy when performed in an experienced centre. The accepted cornerstone for all ablation strategies is isolation of the pulmonary veins. However, it is still challenging to achieve contiguous, transmural, permanent lesions using radio-frequency current (RFC) based catheters in conjunction with a three-dimensional mapping system and the learning curve remains long. These limitations have kindled interest in developing and evaluating novel catheter designs that incorporate alternative energy sources. Novel catheters include balloon-based ablation systems, incorporating different energy modalities such as laser (Heartlight(™), CardioFocus, Marlborough, MA, US), RFC (Hot Balloon Catheter, Hayama Arrhythmia Institute, Kanagawa, Japan) and cryo-energy (ArcticFront, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, US). While the cryoballoon (CB) and the radiofrequency hot balloon (RHB) are single-shot devices, the endoscopic ablation system (EAS) allows for point-by-point ablation. The CB and EAS are well established as safe, time-efficient and effective ablation tools. Initial studies using the RHB could also demonstrate promising results. However, more data are required.

[Innovative techniques in atrial fibrillation therapy]

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone in most catheter-based ablation treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, it is still a challenge to create contiguous, transmural and permanent ablation lesions using radiofrequency current in combination with three-dimensional mapping systems. To overcome these limitations, innovative spiral mapping and ablation catheters as well as balloon-based ablation catheters incorporating alternative energy sources, such as cryoenergy and laser were developed and evaluated and have proved their potential for safe and clinically effective PVI. In addition, novel ablation strategies, such as identification and ablation of AF-inducing foci and/or AF-perpetuating rotors using either endocardial or epicardial mapping systems were introduced and are currently under clinical evaluation. The identification and modulation of atrial ganglionic plexi (GP) and, therefore, of the autonomous nervous system is another additive ablation approach which requires further clinical evaluation.

Rationale and Design of FIRE AND ICE: A multicenter randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation with 3D-reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia imposing substantial morbidity and mortality. Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency current (RFC) has become a standard treatment for drug-resistant and symptomatic paroxysmal AF (PAF). In recent years, the cryoballoon-based technique is increasingly used as a promising alternative with a short learning curve.

METHODS

The FIRE AND ICE trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open, blinded outcome assessment, noninferiority trial comparing cryoballoon-, and RFC-based PVI. Patients with drug-resistant PAF will be randomized in a 1:1 matrix in multiple European centers. The primary hypothesis is that cryoballoon ablation is not inferior to RFC ablation using 3-dimensional mapping with respect to clinical efficacy. The primary endpoint is defined as the time to first documented clinical failure, including: (1) recurrence of AF; (2) atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia; (3) prescription of class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs; or (4) re-ablation, whichever comes first, following a blanking period of 3 months after the index ablation procedure. The primary safety endpoint is a composite of death, stroke/transient ischemic attack, cardiac arrhythmias (apart from AF recurrence) causally related to the therapeutic intervention, and procedure-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The FIRE AND ICE trial compares 2 different technologies to perform catheter ablation of PAF with respect to efficacy and safety. It aims at providing objective data to guide selection and usage of ablation catheters in the treatment of AF.

Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation

AIMS

In the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), there are no available data comparing the mid-term outcome of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) catheter ablation using contact-force (CF)-guided radiofrequency (RF) vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective single-centre evaluation, carried out from March 2011 to February 2013, comparing CF radiofrequency (Thermocool(®) SmartTouch™, Biosense Webster, Inc.) (CF group) with cryoballoon ablation (Arctic Front Advance™ 28 mm cryoballoon, Medtronic, Inc.) (CB group), in regards to procedural safety and efficacy, as well as recurrence at 12 months. Overall, 150 consecutive patients were enrolled (75 in each group). The characteristics of patients of both the groups were similar (61.2 ± 9.9 years, women 25.3%, mean AF duration 4.1 ± 4.0 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.4 ± 1.3, mean HAS-BLED 1.4 ± 0.6). Duration of the procedure was significantly lower in the CF group (110.7 ± 32.5 vs. 134.5 ± 48.3 min, P = 0.001), with a lower duration of fluoroscopy (21.5 ± 8.5 vs. 25.3 ± 9.9 min, P = 0.017) and X-ray exposure (4748 ± 2411 cGy cm² vs. 7734 ± 5361 cGy cm², P = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was found regarding significant procedural complication (2.7 vs. 1.3% in CF and CB groups, respectively; P = 0.56), and PVI was eventually achieved in all cases. At 12 months, AF recurrence occurred in 11 patients (14.7%) in the CB group and in 9 patients (12.0%) in the CF group (HR = 1.20 95% CI 0.50-2.90; log rank P = 0.682).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings suggest that CF-guided radiofrequency and cryotherapy present very similar performances in the setting of paroxysmal AF catheter ablation.

One-Year Clinical Outcome After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using the Second-Generation 28-mm Cryoballoon

Background—

The use of second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has demonstrated encouraging acute and mid-term results. Long-term outcome data are not yet available.

Methods and Results—

Fifty patients (18 women; mean age, 61±11 years; mean left atrial diameter, 43±5 mm) with paroxysmal (36 of 50 patients; 72%) or short-standing (<3-month duration) persistent atrial fibrillation (14 of 50 patients; 28%) underwent cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation. Freeze cycle duration was 240 seconds. After successful pulmonary vein isolation, a bonus freeze was applied. Follow-up was based on outpatient clinic visits at 3, 6, and 12 months including Holter-ECGs and telephonic interviews. Recurrence was defined as a symptomatic or documented arrhythmia episode >30 seconds excluding a 3-month blanking period. A total of 192 pulmonary veins were identified, and 191 of 192 (99%) pulmonary veins were successfully isolated. Phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 1 of 50 (2%) patients. Follow-up was available for 49 of 50 (98%) patients with a mean follow-up duration of 440±39 days. Thirty-nine of 49 (80%) patients remained in stable sinus rhythm. Of 8 of 10 patients with arrhythmia recurrence, a second procedure using radiofrequency ablation demonstrated left atrial to pulmonary vein reconduction.

Conclusions—

The use of second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation results in an 80% 1-year success rate.

The novel human gene aprataxin is directly involved in DNA single-strand-break repair

The cells of an ataxia-oculomotor apraxia type 1 (AOA1) patient, homozygous for a new aprataxin mutation (T739C), were treated with camptothecin, an inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I which induces DNA single-strand breaks. DNA damage was evaluated by cytogenetic analysis of chromosomal aberrations. The results obtained showed marked and dose-related increases in induced chromosomal aberrations in the patient and her heterozygous mother compared to the intrafamilial wild-type control. The alkaline comet assay confirmed this pattern. Moreover, the AOA1 cells did not show hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation, i.e. X-rays. These findings clearly indicate the direct involvement of aprataxin in the DNA single-strand-break repair machinery.