Pitfalls in the echo-Doppler diagnosis of prosthetic valve disorders

Ultrasound imaging artifacts: How to recognize them and how to avoid them

Echocardiography has become a critical tool in clinical cardiology in evaluating cardiac physiology and diagnosing cardiac disease states. However, imaging artifacts are commonly encountered and often lead to misdiagnoses of life-threatening diseases, such as aortic dissection and ventricular thrombus. It is, thus, critical for clinicians to understand these artifacts to avoid these misdiagnoses and protect patients from undue intervention. Artifacts can be broken down into two categories: those from violation of ultrasound system assumptions and those from interference by external equipment and devices. This review article discusses the most commonly encountered artifacts by category, explains their physical mechanisms, elaborates on their most common presentations, and instructs clinicians on how to avoid their misinterpretation.

In vivo short-term doppler hemodynamic profiles of 189 carpentier-edwards perimount pericardial bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position

We sought to determine the hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial valve in the mitral position. We reviewed the Doppler echocardiographic data on 189 patients (110 women; 68 +/- 12 years of age) who were implanted with this valve (7.6 days +/- 13 postoperatively) at our institution between September 2000 and May 2002. The average ejection fraction was 47%. For all valves, the peak velocity was 1.9 +/- 0.3 m/s, peak gradient was 15 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, and mean gradient was 5.8 +/- 2 mm Hg. The pressure half-time was 93 +/- 24 milliseconds, with a calculated effective orifice area of 2.5 +/- 0.6 cm2. The average effective orifice area by continuity equation (83 valves) was 1.5 +/- 0.5 cm2. The mitral regurgitation was graded mild or less in 97.5% of all valves. This is the largest series establishing the favorable hemodynamic behavior of the different sizes of a new Perimount mitral valve, and the reported data could serve as a reference.

Active infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the acute phase of infectious mononucleosis

A 26-year-old male was treated for acute hepatitis due to Epstein-Barr virus and infectious mononucleosis in our hospital. At 2 weeks after admission, there was relapse with high fever. A blood culture detected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A two-dimensional echocardiogram revealed severe aortic regurgitation and vegetation on the left coronary cusp of the aortic valve. The diagnosis was active infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the acute phase of infectious mononucleosis. Following preoperative administration of vancomycin, the aortic valve was replaced with a Carbomedics prosthetic valve. The aortic valve was bicuspid, and the right cusp and non-coronary cusp were conjoined. As the focus of infection was localized to the left coronary cusp, the infected tissue was fully removed with resection of all the cusps. Although fever persisted long after the operation, the blood culture became negative for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and repeated echocardiograms including transesophageal echocardiogram showed no prosthetic valve infection. Vancomycin was administered until the C-reactive protein became negative at 45 days after the operation.

Short-term hemodynamic performance of the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Investigators

BACKGROUND

Although long-term durability data exist, little data are available concerning the hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve in the mitral position.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients who were implanted with mitral PERIMOUNT valves at seven international centers between January 1996 and February 1997 consented to participate in a short-term echocardiography follow-up. Echocardiographs were collected at a mean of 600+/-133 days after implantation (range, 110 to 889 days); all underwent blinded core lab analysis.

RESULTS

At follow-up, peak gradients were 9.09+/-3.43 mm Hg (mean, 4.36+/-1.79 mm Hg) and varied inversely with valve size (p < 0.05). The effective orifice areas were 2.5+/-0.6 cm2 and tended to increase with valve size (p = 0.08). Trace mitral regurgitation (MR) was common (n = 48), 9 patients had mild MR, 1 had moderate MR, none had severe MR. All MR was central (n = 55) or indeterminate (n = 3). No paravalvular leaks were observed. Mitral regurgitation flow areas were 3.4+/-2.8 cm2 and were without significant volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, these mitral valves are associated with trace, although physiologically insignificant, central MR. Despite known echocardiographic limitations, the PERIMOUNT mitral valves exhibit similar hemodynamics to other prosthetic valves.

Incorrect echocardiographic diagnosis in patients with mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction: correlation with surgical findings

PURPOSE

To identify the rate of occurrence and type of incorrect echocardiographic diagnoses in patients with mechanical valve prostheses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 170 consecutive patients (73 women and 97 men) with a total of 208 prostheses who underwent surgery for mitral (n = 136) or aortic (n = 72) valve dysfunction between January 1991 and December 1997. Preoperative echocardiographic data were compared with surgical findings. Any major discrepancy between the echocardiographic reports and surgery was judged to be unconfirmed when the preoperative echocardiographic diagnosis was not confirmed at surgery, but the prosthesis was found to be dysfunctioning; and was judged to be erroneous when the preoperative echocardiographic diagnosis was not confirmed, and surgical inspection failed to reveal any other prosthetic abnormality.

RESULTS

There were 25 (12%) diagnostic errors. Of the 136 mitral prostheses, there were 9 unconfirmed diagnoses of paravalvular regurgitation (6 had a fibrous tissue overgrowth, 1 had a thrombus with fibrous tissue overgrowth, 1 had endocarditis vegetations, and 1 had a ball variance) and 5 erroneous diagnoses. Eleven diagnostic errors were made in the 72 aortic prostheses: there were 9 unconfirmed diagnoses (paravalvular regurgitation was diagnosed as transvalvular in 7, and transvalvular regurgitation as paravalvular in 2 cases), and 2 erroneous diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although echocardiography has gained great credibility among clinicians, special care should be taken when assessing patients in whom prosthetic valve dysfunction is suspected.