Blood anesthesia for cardiopulmonary bypass

Diminished adhesion and activation of platelets and neutrophils with CD47 functionalized blood contacting surfaces

CD47 is a ubiquitously expressed transmembrane protein that, through signaling mechanisms mediated by signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα1), functions as a biological marker of 'self-recognition'. We showed previously that inflammatory cell attachment to polymeric surfaces is inhibited by the attachment of biotinylated recombinant CD47 (CD47B). We test herein the hypothesis that CD47 modified blood conduits can reduce platelet and neutrophil activation under clinically relevant conditions. We appended a poly-lysine tag to the C-terminus of recombinant CD47 (CD47L) allowing for covalent linkage to the polymer. SIRPα1 expression was confirmed in isolated platelets. We then compared biocompatibility between CD47B and CD47L functionalized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) surfaces and unmodified control PVC surfaces. Quantitative and Qualitative analysis of blood cell attachment to CD47B and CD47L surfaces, via scanning electron microscopy, showed strikingly fewer platelets attached to CD47 modified surfaces compared to control. Flow cytometry analysis showed that activation markers for neutrophils (CD62L) and platelets (CD62P) exposed to CD47 modified PVC were equivalent to freshly acquired control blood, while significantly elevated in the unmodified PVC tubing. In addition, ethylene oxide gas sterilization did not inhibit the efficacy of the CD47 modification. In conclusion, CD47 modified PVC inhibits both the adhesion and activation of platelets and neutrophils.

Effects of nafamostat mesilate and minimal-dose aprotinin on blood-foreign surface interactions in cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

The pharmacological inhibition of blood-foreign surface interactions is an attractive strategy for reducing the morbidity associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. We compared the inhibitory effects of nafamostat mesilate (a broad-spectrum synthetic protease inhibitor) and minimal-dose aprotinin on blood-surface interactions in clinical cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

Eighteen patients undergoing coronary surgery were divided into three groups: (1) the control group (heparin, 4 mg/kg; n = 6), (2) the nafamostat mesilate group (heparin plus nafamostat, 0.2 mg/kg bolus followed by 2.0 mg/kg/h during cardiopulmonary bypass; n = 6), and (3) the aprotinin group (heparin plus aprotinin, 2.0 x 10(4) KIU/kg; n = 6). Platelet count, platelet aggregation, beta-thromboglobulin, prothrombin fragment F1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, alpha2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex, D-dimer, neutrophil elastase, and interleukin-6 were measured before, during, and after bypass. Bleeding times and blood loss were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups in platelet count, beta-thromboglobulin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, interleukin-6, bleeding times, or blood loss. Platelet aggregation was better preserved at 12 hours after surgery in the nafamostat and aprotinin groups than in the control group. Prothrombin fragment F1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex and neutrophil elastase levels were significantly reduced by aprotinin, but not by nafamostat as compared with the control group. The alpha2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex and D-dimer were significantly lower with either of the drugs. Aprotinin showed better control of D-dimer than did nafamostat.

CONCLUSIONS

Nafamostat mesilate fails to reduce thrombin formation and neutrophil elastase release, whereas minimal-dose aprotinin inhibits both. Neither nafamostat nor aprotinin inhibits platelet activation. Nafamostat reduces fibrinolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass, although its effect is not as potent as aprotinin.

Heparin-bonded circuits: clinical outcomes and costs

The aim of this study was to use meta-analysis to combine the results of numerous studies and examine the impact of heparin-bonded circuits on clinical outcomes and the resulting costs. Heparin-bonded circuits, both ionically and covalently bonded, are examined separately. The results of the study provide evidence that heparin-bonded circuits result in improved clinical outcomes when compared to the identical nonheparin-bonded circuits. These improved clinical outcomes result in subsequent lower costs per patient with their use. However, differences are apparent in the significance and magnitude of these outcomes between ionically and covalently bonded circuits. Covalently bonded circuits provide a greater magnitude and significance of improvement in clinical outcomes than ionically bonded circuits. Total cost savings can be expected to be three times greater with covalently bonded circuits ($3231 versus $1068). It was concluded that the choice regarding the use of a heparin-bonded circuits and the type of heparin-bonded circuit used has the potential to alter clinical outcomes and subsequent costs. Cost consideration cannot be ignored, but clinical benefits should be the main rationale for the choice of cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. This analysis provides evidence that clinical benefits and cost savings can both be derived from use of the same technology-covalently bonded circuits.

Review on the multifactorial aspects of bioincompatibility in CPB

Over the last few years, a great emphasis has been placed on the bioincompatibility of foreign, nonphysiological materials used during CPB. It is only recently that bioincompatibility has objectively been recognized to be multifactorial, with the dominant implicated sources being cardiotomy blood suction, shear stresses or flow dynamics and, to a lesser degree, the blood/artificial surface interactions, the heparin/protamine complex and the various forms of emboli or debris. In summary, in CPB, the reduction of postoperative complications, such as whole body inflammatory reactions, bleeding and organ dysfunctions, can only be impacted if the primary, dominant sources of bioincompatibility are reduced or eliminated.