Cardiac valve operations using a partial sternotomy (lower half) technique

Minimally invasive technique facilitates early extubation after cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative time to extubation plays a role in prognosis after heart valve surgery; however, its exact impact has not been clarified. This study compared the postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and conventional sternotomy, focusing on early extubation and factors influencing prolonged mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Data from 744 patients who underwent heart valve surgery at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between August 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes in patients who underwent conventional median sternotomy (MS) and minimally invasive (MI) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical data, including surgical data, postoperative cardiac function, postoperative complications, and intensive care monitoring data, were analyzed.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching and IPTW, 196 cases of conventional MS were compared with 196 cases of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Compared to patients in the conventional MS group, those in the MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group in the matched cohort had a higher early postoperative extubation rate (P < 0.01), reduced incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (P < 0.05), significantly shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (P < 0.01), shorter overall length of hospital stay (P < 0.01), and lower total cost of hospitalization (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful early tracheal extubation is important for the intensive care management of patients after heart valve surgery. The advantages of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery over conventional MS include significant reductions in the duration of use of mechanical ventilation support, reduced length of intensive care unit stay, reduced total length of hospitalization, and a favorable patient recovery rate.

Mitral valve replacement via minimally invasive totally thoracoscopic surgery versus traditional median sternotomy: a propensity score matched comparative study

Background

To compare surgical outcomes after mitral valve replacement via either minimally invasive thoracoscopic (MIs) or traditional median sternotomy (MS) surgery and determine the short- and mid-term clinical outcomes of the MI approach.

Methods

All patients who received either MIs (n=405) or MS (n=691) mitral valve replacement surgery at the Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute between January 2012 and July 2015 were analyzed for outcome differences due to surgical approach using propensity score matching. The best 202 matches from the MI group and the MS group were analyzed. The clinical data of the two groups were collected, including preoperative cardiac function, operative data, postoperative complications, and follow-up.

Results

A final total of 404 patients were included in this study after propensity score matching; the MIs group and the MS group each contained 202 patients. The two groups were similar in age, weight, pathological changes, and surgical approach. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (P<0.001), aortic cross-clamping time (P<0.001), and total procedure time (P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding in-hospital mortality, stroke, pneumonia, acute renal failure, arrhythmia, and chylothorax. The MS group had significantly more patients with poor wound healing than the MIs group (P=0.004). The MI group had a lower rate of transfusion (P=0.037), shorter ventilation time (P=0.041), shorter ICU stay (P=0.033), reduced chest tube drainage and length of chest tube stay (P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in hospital re-admission for bleeding, but the total hospitalization cost was higher in the MIs group (P=0.002). The mean follow-up was 26.59±12.33 months, the 1-year postoperative survival rate was 98.86%, and the overall survival rate was 97.44%. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group recovered earlier (P<0.05), and returned to work or study earlier (P<0.05). More patients in the MIs group were satisfied with the wound (P<0.001). The MS group had a higher incidence of postoperative osteomyelitis than the MIs group (P=0.028). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of mortality, stroke, pacemaker, reoperation, or 36-item Short Form Health Survey score.

Conclusions

Compared with the MS approach, the MIs method of mitral valve replacement has longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time; however, it does not increase the risk of mortality and complications. Furthermore, MIs causes less trauma, fewer transfusions, less wound infection, faster recovery, faster return to work or study, and greater satisfaction with the incision in the mid-term. MI cardiac surgery is safe, effective, and feasible.

Minimal Access Heart Surgery via Lower Ministernotomy: Experience in 460 Cases

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has captured the interest and attention of cardiac surgeons throughout the world. We reviewed our experience of minimal access cardiac operations performed through a lower median ministernotomy. Between January 1997 and August 2003, 100 congenital, 178 valvular, 168 coronary, 12 aneurysmal, and 2 other operations were performed via a 6 to 9 cm lower ministernotomy in 460 consecutive patients. No special instruments were required. Four patients died, and 2 re-operations were necessary. Complications occurred in 28 patients (6.1%). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 88.50 ± 65.16 min, crossclamp time was 55.81 ± 31.89 min, time to extubation was 14.71 ± 29.33 h, and total chest drainage was 7.28 ± 5.07 mL·kg−1. Blood transfusions of 951.42 ± 642.34 mL were needed in 282 patients. Postoperative hospital stay was 11.6 ± 6.0 days. Our experience shows that many types of cardiac operations can be performed through a lower ministernotomy. This technique results in less trauma, quick recovery, and reduces the risk of infection and blood loss. It is a safe and easy procedure that can bring about favorable early outcomes in a wide range of cardiac operations.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes

Background

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement tends to be performed in specialist centers. Little data exists with regard to long-term outcomes of the upper hemi-sternotomy technique. We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure in our institution.

Methods

Data were collected from our cardiac surgical database. We compared the outcomes of all patients who underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with all who underwent conventional aortic valve replacement between July 1999 and December 2013. Propensity-matching analysis was performed to evaluate hospital outcomes.

Results

There were 125 patients who underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement and 1446 who had conventional surgery. After propensity score matching, there were no differences in postoperative mortality or complications between the 2 groups. The only significant differences were longer bypass (62.69 ± 10.12 vs. 68.94 ± 14.79 min, p = 0.002) and crossclamp times (45.48 ± 8.08 vs. 52.30 ± 16.29 min, p < 0.001) in conventional surgery. Long-term survival after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement at 2, 6, and 10 years was 88% ± 3.0%, 79% ± 4.0%, and 66% ± 6.0%, respectively. Predictors of long-term survival were age, peripheral vascular disease, and low ejection fraction ( p < 0.005).

Conclusion

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement has similar hospital outcomes compared to conventional aortic valve replacement. The operation is quicker and does not confer any significant increase in complications or length of hospital stay. The long-term outcomes are favorable and justify its continued use by specialist surgeons in the United Kingdom.

Review of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (MIAVS) has been developed for the last 20 years. The improvements in techniques have permitted cardiac surgeons to perform aortic valve replacement safely and efficiently with minimally incisions. Patients have become older and have multiple comorbidities and this is expected to grow in number. Less-invasive procedures are known to reduce the number of complications, together with smaller incisions, less pain, less blood loss and reduced length of hospital stay. Selective preoperative planning with computed tomography is key to the pre-investigation stage. Hybrid and staged procedures with interventional cardiologists are part of the armamentarium and may be appealing for the present and near future. Despite the nature of demanding procedures and longer learning curve with increased cardiopulmonary bypass times, the outcomes are comparable with same quality as conventional open surgery. Patient recovery is the ultimate purpose of these approaches.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery through lower half sternotomy

Less invasive approaches to aortic valve surgery frequently rely upon the development of new technology and instrumentation. While not suitable for every patient requiring an aortic valve procedure, these less invasive operations can offer certain clinical benefits and are becoming an important part of the modern cardiothoracic surgeon's skillset. A lower partial sternotomy approach provides excellent visualization of the operative field, efficient execution of the operation and many of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Importantly, the lower partial sternotomy requires no new or unusual instruments and presents a familiar view to the surgeon. The technique, therefore, lends itself well to being adapted and utilized quickly with a potentially shorter "learning curve" for maximal surgical flexibility and patient benefit.

Predicting target vessel location for improved planning of robot-assisted CABG procedures

Prior to performing a robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting procedure, a pre-operative computed tomography scan is used to assess patient candidacy and to identify the location of the target vessel. The surgeon then determines the optimal port locations to ensure proper reach to the target with the robotic instruments, while assuming that the heart does not undergo any significant changes between the pre- and intra-operative stages. However, the peri-operative workflow itself leads to changes in heart position and consequently the intra-operative target vessel location. As such, the pre-operative plan must be adequately updated to adjust the target vessel location to better suit the intraoperative condition. Here we propose a technique to predict the position of the peri-operative target vessel location with approximately 3.5 mm RMS accuracy. We believe this technique will potentially reduce the rate of conversion of robot-assisted procedures to traditional open-chest surgery due to poor planning.

Evaluation of model-enhanced ultrasound-assisted interventional guidance in a cardiac phantom

Minimizing invasiveness associated with cardiac procedures has led to limited visual access to the target tissues. To address these limitations, we have developed a visualization environment that integrates interventional ultrasound (US) imaging with preoperative anatomical models and virtual representations of the surgical instruments tracked in real time. In this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation of our model-enhanced US-guidance environment by simulating clinically relevant interventions in vitro . We have demonstrated that model-enhanced US guidance provides a clinically desired targeting accuracy better than 3-mm rms and maintains this level of accuracy even in the case of image-to-patient misalignments that are often encountered in the clinic. These studies emphasize the benefits of integrating real-time imaging with preoperative data to enhance surgical navigation in the absence of direct vision during minimally invasive cardiac interventions.

Targeting accuracy under model-to-subject misalignments in model-guided cardiac surgery

In image-guided interventions, anatomical models of organs are often generated from pre-operative images and further employed in planning and guiding therapeutic procedures. However, the accuracy of these models, along with their registration to the subject are crucial for successful therapy delivery. These factors are amplified when manipulating soft tissue undergoing large deformations, such as the heart. When used in guiding beating-heart procedures, pre-operative models may not be sufficient for guidance and they are often complemented with real-time, intra-operative cardiac imaging. Here we demonstrate via in vitro endocardial "therapy" that ultrasound-enhanced model-guided navigation provides sufficient guidance to preserve a clinically-desired targeting accuracy of under 3 mm independently of the model-to-subject misregistrations. These results emphasize the direct benefit of integrating real-time imaging within intra-operative visualization environments considering that model-to-subject misalignments are often encountered clinically.

Surgical accuracy under virtual reality-enhanced ultrasound guidance: an in vitro epicardial dynamic study

In the context of our ongoing objective to reduce morbidity associated with cardiac interventions, minimizing invasiveness has inevitably led to more limited visual access to the target tissues. To ameliorate these challenges, we provide the surgeons with a complex visualization environment that integrates interventional ultrasound imaging augmented with pre-operative anatomical models and virtual surgical instruments within a virtual reality environment. In this paper we present an in vitro study on a cardiac phantom aimed at assessing the feasibility and targeting accuracy of our surgical system in comparison to traditional ultrasound imaging for intra-operative surgical guidance. The 'therapy delivery' was modeled in the context of a blinded procedure, mimicking a closed-chest intervention. Four users navigated a tracked pointer to a target, under guidance provide by either US imaging or virtual reality-enhanced ultrasound. A 2.8 mm RMS targeting error was achieved using our novel surgical system, which is adequate from both a clinical and engineering perspective, under the inherent procedure requirements and limitations of the system.

Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: Reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience

OBJECTIVE

A hemisternotomy approach to minimal-access cardiac surgery is associated with a faster postoperative recovery because of reduced postoperative pain and improved respiratory function. Conversion to a full sternotomy is occasionally required for reasons that remain inadequately reported.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and June 2005, 907 cardiac surgical patients were planned for an upper hemisternotomy and 528 for a lower hemisternotomy. We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who required conversion to a full sternotomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (2.6%) of 907 patients required a conversion from upper hemisternotomy because of bleeding (n = 8), ventricular dysfunction (n = 5), refractory ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3), poor exposure (n = 2), and other causes (n = 6). Eight (33.3%) of 24 patients died perioperatively. Of the 883 patients who went on to have an operation through the upper hemisternotomy approach, the mortality was 1.7% (15/883). Twenty-one (4.0%) of 528 patients required conversion from a lower hemisternotomy because of poor exposure (n = 16), bleeding (n = 1), refractory ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3), and a retained venous cannula (n = 1). None of these patients died postoperatively. Of the 507 patients who went on to have an operation through the lower hemisternotomy approach, the mortality was 1.2% (6/507).

CONCLUSION

Conversion to a full sternotomy occurs infrequently during minimal-access cardiac surgery. Upper hemisternotomy conversions are usually urgent after crossclamp removal and are often associated with serious morbidity and mortality. Conversely, lower hemisternotomy conversions are performed electively in the prebypass period because of poor exposure and are not associated with complications.

Real-time interactive MRI-guided cardiac surgery: aortic valve replacement using a direct apical approach

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery requires arresting and emptying of the heart, which compromises visualization of the surgical field. In this feasibility study a novel surgical procedure is demonstrated in which real-time MRI is used to guide the placement of a prosthetic aortic valve in the beating heart via direct apical access in eight porcine hearts. A clinical stentless bioprosthetic valve affixed to a platinum stent was compressed onto a balloon-tipped catheter. This was fed through a 15-18-mm delivery port inserted into the left ventricular (LV) apex via a minimally invasive subxyphoid incision. Using interactive real-time MRI, the surgeon implanted the prosthetic valve in the correct location at the aortic annulus within 90 s. In four of the animals immediately after implantation, ventricular function, blood flow through the valve, and myocardial perfusion were evaluated with MRI. MRI-guided beating-heart surgery may provide patients with a less morbid and more durable solution to structural heart disease.

Combined percutaneous coronary intervention and valve surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews unique advantages emerging in valvular heart disease as the technology of invasive cardiology and cardiac surgery begin to merge.

RECENT FINDINGS

Minimally invasive valve surgery is increasing in popularity and has helped to reduce morbidity. In addition, preoperative or intraoperative treatment of coronary artery disease by a percutaneous approach has simplified operations and allowed more liberal use of non-traditional incisions.

SUMMARY

Percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents has provided early evidence for decreased restenosis and improved long-term patency rates. At the same time, cardiac surgery has moved toward less invasive approaches performed in new imaging arenas known as 'hybrid' operating rooms. Combining these technological advances is providing unique solutions to valvular heart disease also requiring revascularization, and will likely become the next horizon for strategies in cardiovascular medicine.

Minimally invasive valve surgery: different techniques and approaches

Less invasive approaches to cardiac surgical procedures are being developed in an effort to decrease patient morbidity and enhance postoperative recovery in comparison with conventional methods. Although full median sternotomy has been the standard surgical approach to the heart for more than 30 years, minimally invasive techniques using limited incisions are rapidly gaining acceptance. Potential advantages of a small skin incision include less trauma and tissue injury, leading to a less painful and quicker overall recovery, as well as shorter hospital stays for patients. Decreasing the size of the skin incision for minimally invasive valve surgery to significantly less than the cardiac size requires specific access to the valve to be repaired or replaced. Thus, various minimally invasive techniques and approaches have been described for aortic and mitral valve surgery. This article will review the different minimally invasive techniques and approaches, as well as early results and outcomes for aortic and mitral valve surgery.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: from Port Access to fully robotic-assisted surgery

Currently, there is a growing interest in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, and despite early criticisms, it has become the preferred method of mitral valve repair and replacement in many institutions worldwide with excellent results. The interest in performing cardiac valve operations through minimal incisions was stimulated by Port Access technology and has evolved to include robotically assisted video-enhanced valve surgery. Robotic assistance has led to shorter operating times and represents an ideal tool to prepare for fully robotic-assisted cardiac procedures. This report will highlight minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with its evolution from Port Access techniques to fully robotic-assisted surgery. The nuances, strengths, and shortcomings, as well as the potential to enhance the valvular procedure, the promise to reduce hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, less pain, better cosmesis, and the rethinking of surgical dogma that wide surgical exposure is essential for such complex intracardiac surgery are discussed.