Antiarrhythmic induced electrical storm in Brugada syndrome: a case report

Role of Provocable Brugada ECG Pattern in The Correct Risk Stratification for Major Arrhythmic Events

The so-called Brugada syndrome (BS), first called precordial early repolarization syndrome (PERS), is characterized by the association of a fascinating electrocardiographic pattern, namely an aspect resembling right bundle branch block with a coved and sometime upsloping ST segment elevation in the precordial leads, and major ventricular arrhythmic events that could rarely lead to sudden death. Its electrogenesis has been related to a conduction delay mostly, but not only, located on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), probably due to a progressive fibrosis of the conduction system. Many tests have been proposed to identify people at risk of sudden death and, among all, ajmaline challenge, thanks to its ability to enhance latent conduction defects, became so popular, even if its role is still controversial as it is neither specific nor sensitive enough to guide further invasive investigations and managements. Interestingly, a type 1 pattern has also been induced in many other cardiac diseases or systemic diseases with a cardiac involvement, such as long QT syndrome (LQTS), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and myotonic dystrophy, without any clear arrhythmic risk profile. Evidence-based studies clearly showed that a positive ajmaline test does not provide any additional information on the risk stratification for major ventricular arrhythmic events on asymptomatic individuals with a non-diagnostic Brugada ECG pattern.

Pharmacological Therapy in Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a cardiac disease caused by an inherited ion channelopathy associated with a propensity to develop ventricular fibrillation. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation is recommended in BrS, based on the clinical presentation in the presence of diagnostic ECG criteria. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation is not always indicated or sufficient in BrS, and is associated with a high device complication rate. Pharmacological therapy aimed at rebalancing the membrane action potential can prevent arrhythmogenesis in BrS. Quinidine, a class 1A antiarrhythmic drug with significant Ito blocking properties, is the most extensively used drug for the prevention of arrhythmias in BrS. The present review provides contemporary data gathered on all drugs effective in the therapy of BrS, and on ineffective or contraindicated antiarrhythmic drugs.

Atrial fibrillation in a large population with Brugada electrocardiographic pattern: prevalence, management, and correlation with prognosis

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFl) has been reported in small series of Brugada patients, with discordant data.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze, in a large population of Brugada patients, the prevalence of AF/AFl, its correlation with prognosis, and the efficacy of hydroquinidine (HQ) treatment.

METHODS

Among 560 patients with Brugada type 1 ECG (BrECG), 48 (9%) had AF/AFl. Three groups were considered: 23 patients with BrECG pattern recognized before AF/AFl (group 1); 25 patients first diagnosed with AF/AFl in whom Class IC antiarrhythmic drugs administered for cardioversion/prophylaxis unmasked BrECG (group 2); and 512 patients without AF/AFl (group 3). Recurrence of AF/AFl and occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated at follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 47 ± 15 years, 59 ± 11 years, and 44 ± 14 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Seven subjects (32%) in group 1 had syncope/aborted sudden death, 1 (4%) in group 2, and 122 (24%) in group 3. Ventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients in group 1, none in group 2, and 10 in group 3 at median follow-up of 51, 68, and 41 months, respectively. Nine patients in group 1 and nine in group 2 received HQ for AF/AFl prophylaxis; on therapy, none had AF/AFl recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of AF/AFl in Brugada patients is higher than in the general population of the same age. Patients in group 1 are younger than those in group 2 and have a worse prognosis compared to both groups 2 and 3. HQ therapy has proved useful and safe in patients with AF/AFl and BrECG.

A case of Brugada syndrome presenting with incessant polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Brugada syndrome, an inherited arrhythmogenic cardiac disease, manifests with ST-segment changes in the right precordial leads, right bundle block pattern, and susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death. The only established therapy for this disease is prevention of sudden death by implantation of a defibrillator. Herein we describe a case of a patient who presented with incessant ventricular tachycardia (VT) and syncope and who had a type 1 Brugada pattern on ECG. The patient was successfully treated with quinidine, after which the classically described type 2 and 3 patterns emerged.

Response to intravenous ajmaline: a retrospective analysis of 677 ajmaline challenges

AIMS

The diagnostic type I ECG in Brugada syndrome (BS) is often concealed and fluctuates between the diagnostic and non-diagnostic pattern. Challenge with intravenous ajmaline is used to unmask the diagnostic Brugada ECG. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the test and to identify predictors for the response to an intravenous ajmaline challenge.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In four tertiary referral centres, 677 consecutive patients underwent an intravenous ajmaline challenge for diagnosis or exclusion of BS in accordance with the recommendations of the Brugada consensus conferences. Two hundred and sixty-two ajmaline challenges (39%) were positive. Male gender, familial BS, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), first-degree AV-block, basal saddleback type ECG, and basal right bundle branch block were identified as predictors for a positive ajmaline challenge. A predictor for negative ajmaline test was the absence of ST-segment elevation at baseline. Six of 12 patients who had experienced SCA, and five of 25 patients with a familial sudden death exhibited a positive response to ajmaline. Only one patient (0.15%) developed sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation) during ajmaline challenge, which was terminated by a single external defibrillator shock.

CONCLUSION

Ajmaline challenge is a safe procedure to unmask the electrocardiographic pattern of BS. Electrocardiographic and clinical parameters were identified to predict patients' response to ajmaline. The results of this study guide the clinician in which setting an ajmaline challenge is an appropriate diagnostic step.

Drugs and Brugada syndrome patients: review of the literature, recommendations, and an up-to-date website (www.brugadadrugs.org)

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, the Brugada syndrome has been recognized as an important cause of sudden cardiac death in individuals at a relatively young age. Importantly, many drugs have been reported to induce the characteristic Brugada syndrome-linked ECG abnormalities and/or (fatal) ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the use of drugs in Brugada syndrome patients, to make recommendations based on the literature and on expert opinion regarding drug safety, and to ensure worldwide online and up-to-date availability of this information to all physicians who treat Brugada syndrome patients.

METHODS

We performed an extensive review of the literature, formed an international expert panel to produce a consensus recommendation to each drug, and initiated a website (www.brugadadrugs.org).

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 506 reports for consideration. Drugs were categorized into one of four categories: (1) drugs to be avoided (n = 18); (2) drugs preferably avoided (n = 23); (3) antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 4); and (4) diagnostic drugs (n = 4). Level of evidence for most associations was C (only consensus opinion of experts, case studies, or standard-of-care) as there are no randomized studies and few nonrandomized studies in Brugada syndrome patients.

CONCLUSION

Many drugs have been associated with adverse events in Brugada syndrome patients. We have initiated a website (www.brugadadrugs.org) to ensure worldwide availability of information on safe drug use in Brugada syndrome patients.

Prevalence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in a cohort of 115 patients with Brugada syndrome

BACKGROUND

The Brugada syndrome is characterized by ST segment elevation in leads V(1) to V(3) and a right bundle branch block like pattern. It is associated with an increased risk of syncope and sudden cardiac death. Initial reports in small numbers of patients suggest an association between supraventricular tachycardias and Brugada syndrome with a prevalence varying between 13% and 40%.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, AV reentry tachycardia, and/or atrial fibrillation in a large cohort of patients diagnosed as Brugada syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From three different European centers 115 consecutive patients with a Brugada syndrome were evaluated noninvasively and invasively (mean age 45 +/- 12 years, n = 82 men, n = 33 women). Nineteen of 115 patients (17%) had a history of previous cardiac arrest. Syncope was reported by 58 patients (50%), 33 patients had a positive family history of sudden cardiac death (29%). Supraventricular tachycardias were documented in 26 of the patients (23%): Eight patients (7%) had AV-nodal reentrant tachycardias and two patients had AV-reentry tachycardias; atrial tachycardias were documented in three patients, and another 13 patients (11%) suffered from atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Additionally, atrial fibrillation was inducible by programmed atrial stimulation in nine patients (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Supraventricular tachycardias occur in 23% of patients with Brugada syndrome. Documentation of atrial fibrillation especially in the young or supraventricular tachycardias associated with syncope should give reason to screen for Brugada syndrome.