Myths about elder restraint

A Principlist Justification of Physical Restraint in the Emergency Department

The ethics of physical restraint in the Emergency Department (and elsewhere) has always been an emotive and controversial issue. Recently a vanguard of advocacy groups and regulatory agencies have been aiming to reduce and optimize its use, resulting in new guidance around physical restraint. This article considers prevailing opinions surrounding physical restraint in the Emergency Department using a Principlist model of medical ethics (specifically that of Beauchamp and Childress' four pillars). It also examines the ethical underpinning of the new guidance on the usage of restraint. Ultimately, examination from a Principlist perspective suggests the use of physical restraint in the Emergency Department is justified, as long as it is used carefully. Despite this, physical restraint can have severe physical and psychological consequences for patients, and work needs to be continued into its reduction and optimization.

Improving practice and informing policy development: The impact of gerontological nursing research

Nurses have always approached the clinical care challenges they encounter with a combination of critical observation and a profound concern for human suffering. Beginning in earnest in the early 1980s, nurse researchers have pursued the answers to questions about the wellbeing of older adults, particularly those suffering from serious, chronic conditions. This paper offers three exemplars of nursing research domains that illustrate the creativity and commitment of nurse researchers seeking to understand and improve pervasive clinical problems experienced by older adults and to demonstrate the profound influence these activities have had on the evolution of the science and the quality of care for older adults. The impact of this work is reflected in practice protocols, institutional policies, government oversight, and improved outcomes for patients.

Patterns of palliative care service consultation in a sample of critically ill ICU patients at high risk of dying

OBJECTIVE

Describe patterns of palliative care service consultation among a sample of ICU patients at high risk of dying.

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) face threats to comfort, social connectedness and dignity due to pain, heavy sedation and physical restraint. Palliative care consultation services may mitigate poor outcomes.

METHODS

From a dataset of 1440 ICU patients with ≥2 days of MV and ≥12 h of sustained wakefulness, we identified those at high risk of dying and/or who died and assessed patterns of sub-specialty palliative care consultation.

RESULTS

About half (773/1440 [54%]) were at high risk of dying or died, 73 (9.4%) of whom received palliative care consultation. On average, referral occurred after 62% of the ICU stay had elapsed. Primary reason for consult was clarification of goals of care (52/73 [72.2%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among MV ICU patients at high risk of dying, palliative care service consultation occurs late and infrequently, suggesting a role for earlier palliative care.

Effect of Preferred Music on Agitation After Traumatic Brain Injury

Agitation is a common behavioral problem after traumatic brain injury (TBI), which threatens the safety of patients and caregivers and disrupts the rehabilitation process. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a preferred music intervention on the reduction of agitation in TBI patients and to compare the effects of preferred music with those of classical “relaxation” music. A single group, within-subjects, randomized crossover trial design was formed, consisting of 14 agitated patients with cognitive impairment after severe TBI. Patients listened to preferred music and classical “relaxation” music, with a wash-out period in between. Patients listening to the preferred music reported a significantly greater reduction in agitation compared with the effect seen during the classical “relaxation” music intervention ( p = .046). These findings provide preliminary evidence that the preferred music intervention may be effective as an environmental therapeutic approach for reducing agitation after TBI.

Attitudes of nurses towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

OBJECTIVES

To examine nurses' attitudes towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care.

DESIGN

Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Psyndex, PsychInfo, Social SciSearch, SciSearch, Forum Qualitative Social Research (1/1990 to 8/2013). We performed backward and forward citation tracking to all of the included studies.

REVIEW METHODS

We included in the present review all qualitative and quantitative studies in English and German that investigated nurses' attitudes towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care. Two independent reviewers selected the studies for inclusion and assessed the study quality. We performed a thematic synthesis for the qualitative studies and a content analysis of the questionnaires' items as well as a narrative synthesis for the quantitative surveys.

RESULTS

We included 31 publications in the review: 20 quantitative surveys, 10 qualitative and 1 mixed-method study. In the qualitative studies, nurses' attitudes towards the use of physical restraints in geriatric care were predominately characterised by negative feelings towards the use of restraints; however, the nurses also described a perceived need for using restraints in clinical practice. This discrepancy led to moral conflicts, and nurses described several strategies for coping with these conflicts when restraints were used. When nurses were in doubt regarding the use of restraints, they decided predominantly in favour of using restraints. The results of the quantitative surveys were inconsistent regarding nurses' feelings towards the use of restraints in geriatric care. Prevention of falls was identified as a primary reason for using restraints. However, the items of the questionnaires focussed primarily on the reasons for the use of restraints rather than on the attitudes of nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of evidence regarding the benefits of restraints and the evidence on the adverse effects, nurses often decided in favour of using restraints when in doubt and they used strategies to cope with negative feelings when they used restraints. A clear policy change in geriatric care institutions towards restraint-free care seems to be warranted to change clinical practice. The results of this review should also be considered in the development of interventions aimed at reducing the use of restraints.

Nursing staff views of barriers to physical restraint reduction in nursing homes

PURPOSE

There are few studies globally regarding the barriers to restraint-reduction. The purpose of this study was to describe the views of nursing staff (both nurses and geriatric care assistants) regarding the barriers to reducing physical restraint use in Korean nursing homes.

METHODS

Forty registered nurse and geriatric care assistant informants participated in the first round of interviews and 16 of them participated in second confirmatory interviews. All interviews were conducted on site, one-on-one and face-to-face, using semi-structured interview protocols. Qualitative descriptive method was used and qualitative content analysis was employed.

RESULTS

Six themes were identified: (a) being too busy, (b) lack of resources, (c) beliefs and concerns, (d) lack of education, (e) differences and inconsistencies, and (f) relationship issues.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study provide a valuable basis for developing restraint reduction education programs. Korean national leaders and nursing homes should develop and employ practice guidelines regarding restraints, support nursing staff to follow the guidelines, provide more practical and professional education, employ alternative equipment, use a multidisciplinary team approach, and engage volunteers in care support as well as employ more nursing staff to achieve restraint-free care.

Physical restraint use and falls in nursing homes: a comparison between residents with and without dementia

AIMS

To estimate the use of different types of physical restraints and assess their associations to falls and injuries among residents with and without Alzheimer's disease (AD) or dementia in US nursing homes.

METHODS

Data were from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey. AD or dementia was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Analyses were conducted with the Surveyfreq and Surveylogistic procedures in SAS v.9.1.

RESULTS

Residents with either AD or dementia were more likely to be physically restrained (9.99% vs 3.91%, P < .001) and less likely to have bed rails (35.06% vs 38.43%, P < .001) than those residents without the disease. The use of trunk restraints was associated with higher risk for falls (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.66, P < .001) and fractures (AOR = 2.77, P < .01) among residents with the disease. The use of full bed rails was associated with lower risk for falls among residents with and without the disease (AOR = 0.67 and AOR = 0.72, Ps < .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a trunk restraint is associated with a higher risk for falls and fractures among residents with either AD or dementia.

Tied up and isolated in the schoolhouse

In 1999, the United States General Accountability Office (USGAO) investigated restraints and seclusion use in mental health settings and found patterns of misuse and abuse. A decade later, it found the same misuse and abuse in schools. Restraints and seclusion are traumatizing and dangerous procedures that have caused injury and death. In the past decade, restraints and seclusion have gone from being considered an essential part of the psychiatric mental health toolkit to being viewed as a symptom of treatment failure. In most mental health settings, the use of restraints and seclusion has plummeted due to federal regulations, staff education, and concerted effort of psychiatric national and local leadership. The purpose of this article is to provide a background to and an overview of the present imbroglio over restraints and seclusion in public and private schools, articulate their dangers, dispel myths and misinformation about them, and suggest a leadership role for school nurses in reducing the use of these procedures.

Placing Physical Restraints on Older People with Dementia

This study aimed to clarify the coping strategies of nurses working in general wards who face the ethical dilemma of restraining older people with dementia. The participants were 272 nurses working in general wards in the Kansai region of Japan. Coping strategies were measured using a questionnaire consisting of 16 items. A low score of 1—4 points suggested good coping strategies. Factors were difficult to interpret for three of the 16 coping items identified; these items were therefore deleted. Eleven of the remaining 13 items were used for analysis. An explanatory factor analysis revealed three factors concerning coping with ethical dilemma: (1) self-initiated positive cognition and action; (2) negative cognition and action; and (3) choosing not to act, or maintaining the status quo. These findings highlight the need for programs that could disseminate effective coping strategies among nurses faced with the ethical dilemma of restraining older people with dementia.

[Development and testing of an instrument to measure family's emotional response toward physically restrained patients]

PURPOSE

This was a methodological research to develop an instrument to assess the emotional response of family members of physically restrained patients.

METHODS

A primary instrument with 68 questions was developed based on literature review and semi-structured interviews with family members. A group of experts revised individual questions and removed 4 irrelevant questions. This secondary instrument, then, was tested with 199 family members of physically restrained patients in intensive care units of a university hospital. The validity and reliability of the instrument were tested by factor analysis.

RESULTS

After item analysis, 3 questions with a correlation coefficient under .30 were discarded and the questions with a factor loading under .45 on Varimax Rotation were also removed. After factor analysis on the final 37 questions, 7 factors were identified; avoidance, shock, helplessness, grudge, depression, anxiousness, and acceptance. The total variance explained was 55.63%. The reliability of this instrument was 0.93 of Cronbach's alpha.

CONCLUSION

This instrument was statistically reliable and valid to measure family's emotional response to physical restraints of the patients. This instrument can be useful in assessing the effects of nursing interventions for family members of restrained patients.

A randomized clinical trial to compare the use of safety net enclosures with standard restraints in agitated hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Although hospitals attempt to minimize the use of restraints, certain cases require their application. For such patients, there is a need for novel, safe and more humane restraint systems.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the acceptability and efficacy of safe enclosures in agitated hospitalized patients.

DESIGN

Single-centered randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Community hospital.

PATIENTS

Agitated hospitalized patients requiring restraint.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to either standard restraints or the safe enclosure. We used the SOMA Safe Enclosure.

MEASUREMENTS

Perception scores of relatives, physicians, and nurses; agitation scores of patients (assessed using the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS) and the Alcohol Withdrawal Assessment Form (AWAF)); length of stay; time in restraints; total dose of medication used to treat agitation; and injuries.

RESULTS

Of the 49 patients randomized, 20 were assigned to the safe enclosure group and 29 were assigned to the standard restraint group. Relatives, physicians and secondary nurses rated the safe enclosure more positively than standard restraints (P < .001, P < .001, P = .023, respectively). There was no difference between groups in level of agitation (AWA at 48 hours, P = .8516; ABS at 48 hours, P = .3743); length of stay (P = .3077); time in restraints (P = .5745);or total dose of medication (anti-anxiety medications, P = .5607; anti-psychotic medications, P = .7858). There was one injury to a patient in the standard restraint group and none in the safe enclosure group.

CONCLUSIONS

For hospitalized patients requiring restraint, the SOMA Safe Enclosure is effective and more acceptable to relatives, physicians, and secondary nurses than currently used restraints.

Nurses using physical restraints: Are the accused also the victims? - A study using focus group interviews

Background

To date, the literature has provided an abundance of evidence on the adverse outcomes of restraint use on patients. Reportedly, nurses are often the personnel who initiate restraint use and attribute its use to ensuring the safety of the restrained and the others. A clinical trial using staff education and administrative input as the key components of a restraint reduction program was conducted in a rehabilitation setting to examine whether there were any significant differences in the prevalence of restraint use pre- and post-intervention. Subsequent to the implementation of the intervention program, focus group interviews were conducted to determine the perspective of the nursing staff on the use of restraints and their opinions of appropriate means to reduce their use.

Method

Registered nurses working in units involved in the study were invited to participate in focus group interviews on a voluntary basis. Twenty-two registered nurses (three males [13.6%] and nineteen females [86.4%]) attended the four sessions. All interviews were audio taped and transcribed verbatim. Other than the author, another member of the project team validated the findings from the data analysis.

Results

Four themes were identified. Participants experienced internal conflicts when applying physical restraints and were ambivalent about their use, but they would use restraints nonetheless, mainly to prevent falls and injuries to patients. They felt that nurse staffing was inadequate and that they were doing the best they could. They experienced pressure from the management level and would have liked better support. Communication among the various stakeholders was a problem. Each party may have a different notion about what constitutes a restraint and how it can be safely used, adding further weight to the burden shouldered by staff.

Conclusion

Studies about restraints and restraint use have mostly focused on nurses' inadequate and often inaccurate knowledge about the use of restraints and its associated adverse effects. These studies, however, fail to note that nurses can also be victims of the system. Restraint use is a complex issue that needs to be understood in relation to the dynamics within an environment.

Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: a multilevel approach

This paper reports a study of the relationship between the use of physical restraints with psycho-geriatric nursing home residents and the characteristics of organisations and residents. It is hypothesised that impairment in residents and organisational characteristics, such as a high workload of nursing staff and a low full-time equivalent (FTE) ratio on the wards, are associated with increased restraint use. In a cross-sectional study involving 15 Dutch psycho-geriatric nursing home wards, 432 residents were selected for participation, of which 371 actually participated. Restraint status was measured using observations. Other resident characteristics, such as cognitive status, were determined using the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Job characteristics, such as workload, were determined by different self-reported measures. Characteristics of the wards, such as the FTE ratio, were derived from the registration system of the wards. Physical restraints were used with 56% of the psycho-geriatric nursing home residents. Bivariate analysis showed that job and ward characteristics were not associated with restraint use. Bivariate and multilevel analysis showed that residents' characteristics, such as mobility and cognitive status were significantly associated with restraint use. Furthermore, multilevel analysis showed that higher job autonomy experienced by nursing staff and a higher FTE ratio on the wards were also associated with increased restraint use. In conclusion, job and ward characteristics were not as strongly associated as residents' characteristics with restraint use. Impairments in residents, such as immobility, were strongly related to the use of restraints. Therefore, education and support of nursing staff in caring for psycho-geriatric nursing home residents with poor mobility is recommended to reduce the use of physical restraints in nursing homes.

Framing Patient Safety Initiatives

The authors describe an original patient Safety Platform Model. The model identifies the broad components involved in patient safety initiatives and outlines their relationship to one another. A case example of how the model can be used is given as the authors describe a falls-prevention program.

Patient autonomy in physical restraint

Despite initiatives to raise the awareness of patient autonomy among healthcare providers, the use of physical restraints on frail or confused older patients continues to be a common practice in many healthcare settings. This paper examines the relationship between patient autonomy and the use of physical restraints by drawing on the literature contradicting its efficacy and the assumption that its use is necessary to protect the welfare of patients. It argues that the paternalistic use of physical restraints without patient's informed consent is morally unjustified and is an unequivocal violation of their autonomy. The duty to respect individual autonomy should be extended to a duty to respect the autonomy of older people who are being restrained. Only in this way can their human dignity and quality of life be enhanced.

Organizational characteristics and restraint use for hospitalized nursing home residents

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of organizational characteristics on physical restraint use for hospitalized nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data obtained between 1994 to 1997 in a prospective phase lag design experiment using an advanced practice nurse (APN) intervention aimed at reducing physical restraint for a group of hospitalized nursing home residents.

SETTING

Eleven medical and surgical units in one 600-bed teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred seventy-four nursing home residents aged 61 to 100, hospitalized for a total of 1,085 days.

MEASUREMENTS

Physical restraint use, APN intervention, age, perceived fall risk, behavioral phenomena, perceived treatment interference, mental state, severity of illness, day of week, patient-registered nurse (RN) ratio, patient-total nursing staff ratio, and skill mix.

RESULTS

Controlling for the APN intervention, age, and patient behavioral characteristics (all of which increased the likelihood of restraint use), weekend days as an organizational characteristic significantly increased the odds of restraint (weekend day and patient-RN ratio on physical restraint use: odds ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.38-2.68, P <.001; weekend day and patient-total staff ratio on physical restraint use: OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.37-2.66, P <.001; weekend day and skill mix on physical restraint use: OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.37-2.67, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Key findings suggest that organization of hospital care on weekends and patient characteristics that affect communication ability, such as severely impaired mental state, English as a second language, sedation, and sensory-perceptual losses, may be overlooked variables in restraint use.

Nurse caregiver feelings about agitation in Alzheimer's disease

This study examines the feelings of nurse caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who are agitated. Methods included participant observation, examination of medical records, and ethnographic interviews of 17 nurse caregivers from one inpatient setting. Two patterns of feelings emerged from the data. One pattern was associated with caregiver expressions of personal identification with and vulnerability to AD. These nurses endorsed feelings of helplessness, men hopelessness, and frustration when providing care to agitated AD patients. A second pattern situated nursing interactions within the realistic context of the patient's response to the illness. Caregiver feelings of confidence, competence, and satisfaction were associated with the second pattern. The relationship between the feeling states of nurse caregivers and their reported management of agitation in AD is discussed. Recognition and awareness of distressing feelings is a necessary first step for nurses to learn less personalized reactions to patients and respond more objectively to agitated behaviors.

Behavioral and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia: a practicing psychiatrist's viewpoint

Alzheimer's disease typically presents with two often overlapping syndromes, one cognitive, the other behavioral. The behavioral syndrome is characterized by psychosis, aggression, depression, anxiety, agitation, and other common if less well-defined symptoms subsumed under the umbrella entity “behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia” (BPSD), itself divided into a number of subsyndromes: psychosis, circadian rhythm (sleepwake) disturbance, depression, anxiety, and agitation, it is BPSD with its impact on care providers that ultimately precipitates the chain of events resulting in long-term institutional care. The treatment challenge involves eliminating unmet medical needs (undiagnosed hip fracture and asymptomatic urinary tract infection or pneumonia). Pharmacologic intervention relies on risperidone and, increasingly cholinesterase inhibitors for the control of psychosis (but with response rates of only 65% at tolerable doses), olanzapine and risperidone for anxiety, and carbamazepine and valproic acid for agitation. However, evidence increasingly favors nonpharmacologic interventions, to the extent that these should now be considered as the foundation of BPSD treatment. Problem behaviors are viewed as meaningful responses to unmet needs in the therapeutic milieu. Because the progression and impact of BPSD varies between patients, interventions must be explored, designed, implemented, and assessed on an individual basis. They include: family support and education, psychotherapy reality orientation, validation therapy, reminiscence and life review, behavioral interventions, therapeutic activities and creative arts therapies, environmental considerations (including restraint-free facilities), behavioral intensive care units, and workplace design and practices that aid the ongoing management of professional caregiver stress.

Confusion and aggression in restrained elderly persons undergoing hip repair surgery

The purpose of this pilot study was to observe and describe the behaviors of confusion and aggression in physically restrained elderly hospitalized persons following hip repair surgery. Five elderly persons who were 75-95 years of age and physically restrained following hip repair surgery comprised the sample of this descriptive study. Descriptive data including age, sex, medical diagnosis, current medications, serum electrolyte and arterial blood gas results, date/time of hip fracture, subsequent surgical repair, and restraint application were obtained from the medical record. Observations of behaviors associated with confusion and aggression were conducted at six separate observation times lasting approximately 20 to 30 minutes each. The observation periods were divided into two mornings, two afternoons, and two evening sessions. These behaviors were assessed by utilizing a combined observational tool developed by the researcher, and was created from the Clinical Assessment of Confusion--A, by Vermeersch, and Ryden Aggression Scale. After data analysis, three patterns of confusion emerged. These were the major pattern of confusion, the minor pattern of confusion, and pattern of confusion relative to time. All patients experienced low serum sodium levels immediately prior to the application of physical restraints. Based on the results of the pilot study, further investigation is needed.

Physical and pharmacologic restraints in long-term care facilities

This study examined the effects of education on the attitudes and practices of long-term care staff toward use of restraints. The intervention, a 1-day educational seminar, used a collaborative team of speakers from the Utah Survey Agency and medical professions. Seminar goals were threefold: first, to provide information about best practices for managing behaviors of individuals with dementia in long-term care settings; second, to provide an explanation of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act regulations pertaining to restraint use; and third, to present alternative strategies to link best practice guidelines to the provision of care. Results showed significant changes in participants' attitudes toward use of restraints. Participants reported replicating the seminar for nursing home staff, revisiting facility policies on restraints, and modifying resident care plans.

Review of the literature on falls among the elderly

PURPOSE

To review and summarize the literature from nursing, medical, and ancillary fields on falls among the elderly. Major injuries from falls are associated with mortality, especially among the elderly. Researchers indicate that, in many cases, falls can be prevented. A summary of the available literature provides information which can be used to plan interventions.

ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK

Over 100 publications, 1979-1996 related to falls by elderly were reviewed. Descriptive terms used for searching MEDLINE were falls, elderly, and accidents. Literature from several disciplines was reviewed.

FINDINGS

Fall risk can be predetermined and nursing actions can be taken to reduce the occurrence and severity of falls.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the deleterious effects of falls in the elderly, knowledge-based practice is essential.

Reducing Restraints: Where to Start

To begin a restraint reduction program at a large neuropsychiatric Veterans Affairs medical center, nursing educators examined perceptions of and knowledge about restraint use among 113 nursing staff members employed on one acute, two intermediate, and five long-term care units. Strumpf and Evans' (1988) Perceptions of Restraint Use Questionnaire, a knowledge test, and questions about personal characteristics were used. Top reasons for restraint use identified were to prevent pulling on an intravenous line, to prevent breaking open sutures, and to protect from a fall. Although knowledge scores were high, they did not correlate significantly with ability to suggest alternatives. Respondents viewed restraint use as a somewhat important intervention. Statistically significant differences were found between level of practice and number of alternatives listed, knowledge score, and personal perception score. Implications for nursing educators embarking on a restraint reduction program are discussed including myths and quality-of-life issues.

A clinical trial to reduce restraints in nursing homes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relative effects of two experimental interventions on the use of physical restraints.

DESIGN

Prospective 12-month clinical trial in which three nursing homes were randomly assigned to restraint education (RE), restraint education-with-consultation (REC), or control (C).

SETTING

Three voluntary nursing homes in the Philadelphia area providing both skilled and intermediate care.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 643 nursing home residents over the age of 60 were enrolled at baseline, and 463 remained to completion (1 year).

INTERVENTIONS

Both RE and REC homes received intensive education by a masters-prepared gerontologic nurse to increase staff awareness of restraint hazards and knowledge about assessing and managing resident behaviors likely to lead to use of restraints. In addition, the REC home received 12 hours per week of unit-based nursing consultation to facilitate restraint reduction in residents with more complex conditions.

MEASUREMENTS

Restraint status was observed systematically at baseline, immediately after the 6-month intervention, and again at 9 and 12 months. Staff levels, psychoactive drug use, and injuries were also determined.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, the REC home had a statistically significant reduction in restraint prevalence, whereas RE and C homes did not. At 9 months (3 months post-intervention), absolute decline in the percents restrained were 7% RE, 7% C, and 20% REC; at 12 months (6 months post-intervention) declines were 4% RE, 6% C, and 18% REC. However, relative to baseline, these declines represent an average reduction in restraint use of 23% RE, 11% C, and 56% REC. The differences in changes over time were consistently significant (P = .01), whether considering survivors or those present at each time point, and also when controlling for differences between groups at baseline. Further, given any change in restraint use, REC-residents were between 25% and 40% more likely than either RE or C residents to experience decreased restraint use. Results were achieved without increased staff, psychoactive drugs, or serious fall-related injuries.

CONCLUSION

A 6-month-long educational program combined with unit-based, resident-centered consultation can reduce use of physical restraints in nursing homes effectively and safely. Whether extending the intervention will achieve greater reduction is not known from these results.

OBRA '87: has it resulted in better quality of care?

This study examines perspectives of a broad group of nursing home employees, regulators, advocates, and professional associations to describe progress made since the 1990 implementation of the Nursing Home Reform legislation (OBRA '87) and to determine whether the legislation is perceived as affecting positive change for nursing home residents. Interviews were conducted with 59 residents and 132 professional and non-professional staff in six states. Important quality of care issues of resident rights, resident dignity, restraint use, resident assessment, as well as perspectives of residents themselves are explored. In general, OBRA '87 is viewed as positive, with all groups of respondents indicating that residents have benefited from it. They identify the focus on resident rights as the most important accomplishment. Empowerment of residents through involvement in care decisions is noted by many as an important achievement. Many conclude that quality of care has improved and restraint use has decreased. The MDS is a useful tool from the standpoint of nursing home staff and regulators. This appraisal sharply contrasts their opinions about the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening tool. We believe that PASARR should be reexamined and that changes should be made in the process and/or implementation of the tool.

The advanced practice nurse and changing perspectives on physical restraint

Regulatory changes concerning the use of physical restraints in nursing homes have stimulated an examination of restraint use practices in other care settings. Caregivers are receiving mixed messages about appropriate restraint use in the hospital. Legal decisions are ambiguous in terms of the nurse's liability for restraint decisions, and the use of restraints may create a conflict between respecting patient autonomy and acting in the patient's best interest. Recent research does not support the belief that restraint use prevents patient injuries, but continues to document the untoward effects of restraints. Restraint reduction efforts have been successful in nursing homes, and many strategies can be adapted in acute care. As the movement to integrated systems of care places increased emphasis on continuity of services across settings and improved client outcomes, restraint practice is one area where interinstitutional collaboration and coordination must occur. The advanced practice nurse is in a key role to facilitate continuity of restraint reduction efforts.

Restraint-free care: how does a nurse decide?

Decisions by nurses to avoid physical restraint use in older adults is a complex process that requires individualized, comprehensive assessment and creative problem-solving. Institutional and social policy increasingly support a standard of restraint elimination influencing care decisions with frail older adults. It has become clear that the decision to avoid or use physical restraint is influenced as well by nurses' attitude or beliefs about the efficacy of restraint. To further understand how decisions are made to avoid physical restraint, it is important to also explore the degree to which nurses possess knowledge, autonomy, and accountability in this decision-making process. Understanding how decisions are influenced will advance the development of restraint-free care interventions for older adults.

Ethical issues in nursing home care: practice guidelines for difficult situations

Dental professionals encounter a number of challenging ethical and legal dilemmas when caring for nursing home residents. Questions may arise in determining a patient's capacity to make decisions, securing consent for treatment, choosing the most appropriate from among several treatment options, and when and how to use restraints. When securing consent for treatment, practitioners must consider both the patient's legal competence and his/her decision-making capacity, and adopt roles appropriate to the patient's circumstances. If legal competence has been retained but decision-making seems impaired, practitioners must involve others in the process of determining appropriate care. The capacity to consent to treatment can be assessed by questions designed to evaluate the patient's ability to understand relevant information, appreciate the situation and consequences, manipulate information rationally, and communicate choices. When faced with a choice of several treatment options and patient preferences are unclear or unknown, the principle of substituted judgment should be used to attempt to provide care in keeping with the patient's values. To maximize patient safety and dignity, ten guidelines are presented for the use of restraints to provide dental care for individuals with behavior problems.

Hospital nurses' views about physical restraint use with older patients

1. A survey of knowledge, practice and attitudes about physical restraints was completed by nursing staff (RN, LPN, CNA) from four hospitals. 2. Nurses from both geriatric and geropsychiatric units reported significantly more educational activities about restraint use than did nurses on medical units. 3. RNs had the highest knowledge scores (56%), but lacked specific information about the dangers associated with restraint use. 4. While education about restraints is important, staff need role models who can help them problem solve and examine alternatives to restraints.

Exercising restraint: autonomy, welfare and elderly patients

Despite moves to enhance the autonomy of clients of health care services, the use of a variety of physical restraints on the freedom of movement of frail, elderly patients continues in nursing homes. This paper confronts the use of restraints on two grounds. First, it challenges the assumption that use of restraints is necessary to protect the welfare of frail, elderly patients by drawing on a range of data indicating the limited efficacy of restraints. Secondly, it argues that the duty to respect individual autonomy extends to a duty to respect the autonomy of patients who are elderly, frail and living in nursing homes.

Exemplars from an acute care geriatric psychiatry unit

The exemplars in this article reflect caring contexts and creative nursing solutions to dementia, depression, and addiction, common mental health problems afflicting elderly patients and for which inpatient evaluation and treatment are necessitated. Optimal functioning and quality of life for elderly individuals depend substantially upon both physical and mental capacity. The coexistence of mental and physical illness leads to rapid impairment of functioning and interrupts the individual's zest for living. Although in most cases dementia is irreversible, other treatable comorbid conditions like delirium can exacerbate suffering and decline. Conversely, mental disorders, like depression and addiction, can amplify the negative effects associated with other health conditions, causing excess disability and mortality, and are associated with older individuals having the highest suicide rate of any age group in the United States. Nurses are well positioned to identify mental health problems and humanely treat primary and secondary symptoms associated with these disorders in their elderly patients. A document to guide medical professionals' assessment of mental disorders is now available (Spitzer et al., 1994). Remaining attentive to early identification of high-risk individuals and mobilizing resources in their behalf will substantially contribute to their well-being. There is ample research evidence on the benefits and efficacy of mental health interventions (Lebowitz, 1994). Much of the challenge and hard work for nurses lies in getting to know the patient, grasping what is happening for the individual and determining which treatment interventions will be most effective given the present circumstances surrounding the illness episode (Benner, 1984).

Focus groups: nursing staff's experiences using restraints

A phenomenological approach was used to examine nursing staff's experiences using physical restraints. A total of 12 nurses from a tertiary hospital participated in one of three focus groups. Exploring the attitudes of nurses can contribute to a better understanding of how decisions are made concerning restraints. An analysis of the focus group data resulted in a description of the lived experiences of nurses using restraints. Seven themes emerged from the data, one of which reflected that the nurses felt ambiguous about restraints, yet they made judgments and justified their decisions after assessing patient characteristics, environmental safety, and unit traditions. Nurse clinicians could use the focus group method to sensitize themselves to the staff's needs and to allow staff the opportunity to share ideas and to dispel misconceptions about restraints.

Progress toward a restraint-free environment in a large academic nursing facility

OBJECTIVE

To review the implementation and evolution of a successful physical restraint reduction program in a large nursing facility.

INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS

An initiative to reduce physical restraint began in March of 1990 with formation of a Restraint Review Committee (RRC), which developed and guided a program of inservice education, policy change, and procedural innovation. Progress was measured by monthly prevalence surveys of restraint use, both unit-specific and facility-wide.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

The study took place in an 816-bed not-for-profit nursing facility with academic affiliation and closed medical staff. Mean age of residents was 85.5; 74% were female and 26% male.

RESULTS

Physical restraint prevalence in our facility was reduced from 39% to 4% over 3 years, with marked decrease in variation among nursing units. Prevalence initially decreased to 20% after policy modifications and inservice education programs. Further innovations in procedure and policy resulted in continued reduction of physical restraint to 4%. The facility-wide rate of falls and accident-related injuries did not change over the 3-year period. Decrease in physical restraint was not accompanied by a change in the percentage of residents prescribed psychotropic medications such as benzodiazepines and neuroleptics.

CONCLUSIONS

In response to the mandate to provide a least-restrictive environment, our institution has developed a successful system resulting in a dramatic reduction in physical restraint use. Changes in institutional culture and barriers to change are discussed, as well as issues of cost and generalizability.

Delirium and physical restraint in the hospitalized elderly

Delirium or acute confusion increase the likelihood of physical restraint use and subsequent harmful physical and psychological effects. Assessment for delirium is presented as a conceptual framework to guide researchers, administrators, and clinicians in developing strategies to decrease the use of physical restraint and to support quality of life for hospitalized older adults.

Culture, environment, and restraints: a conceptual model for research and practice

1. Despite its importance to the care of the elderly, little research has focused on the effects of the environment on health and well-being. 2. It is hypothesized that environmental factors, including cultural attitudes and beliefs of nursing home staff, contribute to restraint of nursing home residents. 3. Nurses can be instrumental in creating a nursing home culture that values a restraint-free environment.