Extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion: the role of common carotid artery volume flow

Selective elevation in external carotid artery flow during acute gravitational transition to microgravity during parabolic flight

This study sought to determine to what extent acute exposure to microgravity (0 G) and related increases in central blood volume (CBV) during parabolic flight influence the regional redistribution of intra and extra cranial cerebral blood flow (CBF). Eleven healthy participants performed during two parabolic flights campaigns aboard the Airbus A310-ZERO G aircraft. The response of select variables for each of the 15 parabolas involving exposure to both 0 G and hypergravity (1.8 G) were assessed in the seated position. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored and used to calculate stroke volume (SV), cardiac output ([Formula: see text]), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Changes in CBV were measured using an impedance monitor. Extracranial flow through the internal carotid, external carotid, and vertebral artery ([Formula: see text]ICA, [Formula: see text]ECA, and [Formula: see text]VA), and intracranial blood velocity was measured by duplex ultrasound. When compared with 1-G baseline condition, 0 G increased CBV (+375 ± 98 mL, P = 0.004) and [Formula: see text] (+16 ± 14%, P = 0.024) and decreased SVR (-7.3 ± 5 mmHg·min·L-1, P = 0.002) and MAP (-13 ± 4 mmHg, P = 0.001). [Formula: see text]ECA increased by 43 ± 46% in 0 G (P = 0.030), whereas no change was observed for CBF, [Formula: see text]ICA, or [Formula: see text]VA (P = 0.102, P = 0.637, and P = 0.095, respectively).NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our findings demonstrate that in microgravity there is a selective increase in external carotid artery blood flow whereas global and regional cerebral blood flow remained preserved. To what extent this reflects an adaptive, neuroprotective response to counter overperfusion remains to be established.

Common carotid artery peak systolic velocity ratio predicts high-grade common carotid stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Screening for common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis with duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria alone can be limited by within-patient and between-patients hemodynamic variability. This study aimed to evaluate inter-CCA velocity ratio criteria to predict high-grade CCA stenosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent computed tomography angiography and DUS peak systolic velocity (PSV) measurements of bilateral CCAs, independently recorded, between 2008 and 2014. Patients with dampened CCA waveforms on DUS composed group B. The remainder without dampened waveforms constituted group A. Inter-CCA PSV ratios were calculated by dividing the higher CCA PSV by the lower one of the other side, so the ratios would always be ≥1. Ratios were subsequently paired with each respective unilateral CCA diameter stenosis and differential bilateral CCA diameter stenosis. A quadratic regression model was fitted to predict unilateral and differential stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine optimal ratios for ≥50% and ≥80% CCA stenosis. The study excluded patients with carotid artery occlusion.

RESULTS

From a total of 201 patients, 193 patients were included in group A and 8 in group B. Within group A, 31 patients had ≥50% unilateral stenosis and 17 had ≥50% differential stenosis. All stenoses ≥50% were identified on the same side with the higher PSV. Inter-CCA PSV ratio predicted ≥50% unilateral (r(2) = 0.536; P < .001) and differential stenosis (r(2) = 0.581; P < .001). In group B, all patients had ≥60% stenosis that was near or involved the vessel origin. An increasing inter-CCA PSV ratio showed a trend toward contralateral high-grade stenosis (r(2) = 0.596; P = .1). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed an optimal threshold CCA ratio ≥2.16 for ≥50% unilateral stenosis with 92% accuracy, 62% sensitivity, and 98% specificity (area under curve = 0.854; 95% confidence interval, 0.759-0.948) and a ratio ≥2.62 for ≥50% differential stenosis with 97% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, and 98% specificity (area under curve = 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.835-1).

CONCLUSIONS

DUS-based CCA PSV ratio can accurately predict unilateral and differential high-grade CCA stenosis. Also, in patients with unilateral dampened waveforms, it implied contralateral severe proximal stenosis. This parameter should be further validated in prospective studies and may serve as an adjunct screening tool to detect high-grade CCA stenosis.

Carotid stenosis assessed with a 4-dimensional semiautomated Doppler system

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare peak systolic velocities (PSVs) and the degree of stenosis obtained with a real-time 3-dimensional (ie, 4-dimensional) Doppler ultrasound scanner (Encore PV; VueSonix Sensors Inc, Wayne, PA) to conventional Doppler ultrasound imaging of the carotid arteries (common [CCA], internal [ICA], and external [ECA]). A secondary goal was to assess Encore volume flow measurements.

METHODS

Seventy patients referred for clinical carotid ultrasound participated in this pilot study. Peak systolic velocities of the CCA, ECA, and ICA were obtained bilaterally. The degree of stenosis in the ICA was calculated based on the ICA PSV and ICA/CCA PSV ratio. The Encore detects all 3-dimensional blood flow velocity vectors within 10-s longitudinal volumes of the ICA, ECA, and CCA. On the Encore, a reader determined the centerline of the vessels. The PSV and volume flow were then automatically calculated. The flow measurement error was obtained by comparing the CCA flow to the ICA and ECA flow. Data were compared using linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Due to technical difficulties, only 59 patients (323 vessel segments) were available for analysis. There was good agreement between methods for assessing the degree of stenosis based on the ICA PSV (ICC = 0.83; P < .0001) and, to a lesser degree, on the ICA/CCA PSV ratio (ICC = 0.65; P < .0001). Peak systolic velocity measurements obtained with conventional ultrasound and the Encore correlated in all vessels (r >or= 0.32; P < .002), and Bland-Altman analysis showed reasonable variations. The Encore mean volume flow error +/- SD was -4.1% +/- 66.4% and was not biased (P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

A new semiautomated 4-dimensional Doppler device is comparable to conventional Doppler ultrasound for assessment of carotid stenosis.

Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques

Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are: Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), Xenon-enhanced Computed Tomography (XeCT), Dynamic Perfusion-computed Tomography (PCT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC), Arterial Spin-Labeling (ASL), and Doppler Ultrasound. These techniques give similar information about brain hemodynamics in the form of parameters such as cerebral blood flow (CBF) or volume (CBV). All of them are used to characterize the same types of pathological conditions. However, each technique has its own advantages and drawbacks. This article addresses the main imaging techniques dedicated to brain hemodynamics. It represents a comparative overview, established by consensus among specialists of the various techniques. For clinicians, this paper should offers a clearer picture of the pros and cons of currently available brain perfusion imaging techniques, and assist them in choosing the proper method in every specific clinical setting.

Volume Flow Rate of Common Carotid Artery Measured by Doppler Method and Color Velocity Imaging Quantification (CVI-Q)

BACKGROUND

Common carotid artery (CCA) volume flow rate (VFR) is clinically useful for study of cerebrovascular disease. Color Velocity Imaging Quantification (CVI-Q; Philips Ultrasound International, Irvine, CA), previously reported as accurate and reliable, tracks the flow lumen over the cardiac cycle, as well as mean spatial velocity, which is multiplied by vessel area to obtain VFR. VFR can also be obtained by Doppler sampling for mean velocity, and vessel area based on static B-mode lumen diameter. We compared CCA VFR by CVI-Q and Doppler method (DM), since knowledge of how they compare is crucial when both are used clinically.

METHOD

We prospectively studied patients having clinical carotid duplex exams and healthy controls. All had CCA VFR measured by both methods in the same exam session.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were reviewed. CCA VFR by CVI-Q in those without ICA stenosis was 337 +/- 96 mL/m, and by DM 359 +/- 130 mL/m; P = .33. There was no difference between methods for 50-75% or 75-95% ICA stenosis. In 7 patients with ICA occlusion, and 3 with 95-99% stenosis, VFR was higher by DM than by CVI-Q (Occlusion: 125 vs 58 mL/m, P = .007; 95-99%: 152 vs 63 mL/m, P = .038). There was no statistically significant difference between methods for measurement of the ratio of VFR between right and left CCA.

CONCLUSION

In patients with 0-95% ICA stenosis, VFR by CVI-Q and DM showed no difference. For 95-100% ICA stenosis the methods differ; with higher VFR by DM. Side-to-side VFR ratios remain constant, irrespective of VFR method, and can still provide clinically useful information.

Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography, dynamic perfusion computed tomography, MRI dynamic susceptibility contrast, arterial spin labeling, and Doppler ultrasound. These techniques give similar information about brain hemodynamics in the form of parameters such as cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume. All of them are used to characterize the same types of pathological conditions. However, each technique has its own advantages and drawbacks.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

This article addresses the main imaging techniques dedicated to brain hemodynamics. It represents a comparative overview established by consensus among specialists of the various techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

For clinicians, this article should offer a clearer picture of the pros and cons of currently available brain perfusion imaging techniques and assist them in choosing the proper method for every specific clinical setting.

Assessment of cerebral blood flow by means of blood-flow-volume measurement in the internal carotid artery: comparative study with a 133xenon clearance technique

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate a new, angle-independent ultrasonic device for assessment of blood flow volume (BFV) in the internal carotid artery (ICA).

METHODS

Nineteen patients and 4 healthy volunteers were enrolled in a comparative study conducted in the Care Unit of the Division of Neurosurgery at UCLA Medical Center. All patients had been admitted because of severe brain injury: 15 patients with severe head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale score< or =8) and 4 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to aneurysm rupture. In all patients and subjects, cerebral blood flow (CBF) values obtained with the 133xenon-clearance technique were compared with BFV measurements in the ipsilateral ICA.

RESULTS

Hemispheric CBF values showed a close and linear correlation with BFV measurements (r=0.76, P<0.0001). Global CBF values showed a higher correlation with the total BFV value obtained from both ICAs (r=0.84, P<0.0001). With 37 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) as a cutoff value for the ischemic range, a BFV value of 220 mL/min would yield a positive predictive value of 91.7% and a negative predictive value of 82.6% (sensitivity 73.3%, specificity 95%). Conversely, BFV sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 96%, respectively, for the hyperemic range defined by a CBF value >55 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) (positive predictive value of 85.7% and negative prediction value of 85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

BFV measurements with this new technology proved to accurately correlate with CBF values evaluated by the 133xenon-clearance technique. These results support the implementation of this technique for bedside assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in critically ill neurosurgical patients.