Reflux esophagitis patients in Singapore have motor and acid exposure abnormalities similar to patients in the Western hemisphere

Antireflux surgery is equally beneficial in nonerosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

Purpose

Although nonerosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have similar symptom severity, nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is considered a milder type of GERD and gastroenterologists have hesitated to refer these patients for antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of antireflux surgery between patients with NERD and erosive reflux disease (ERD).

Methods

Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria of this study among a total of 117 patients who underwent antireflux surgery from November 2012 to October 2017. According to preoperative endoscopy, patients were classified into NERD group (minimal changes or no esophagitis) and ERD group. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between NERD and ERD.

Results

There were 26 patients in NERD group and 44 patients in ERD group. The male:female ratio was higher in the ERD group than in the NERD group (P = 0.044). Preoperative symptoms, response to acid suppressive medication, acid exposure on pH monitoring study, and esophageal manometry results were similar in the 2 groups. Reflux on barium esophagography was more frequently observed in ERD (77.3%) than in NERD (50.0%, P = 0.019). At 6 months after surgery, complete resolution and partial improvement of GERD symptoms were similar in the 2 groups (80.8% and 15.4%, respectively, in NERD vs. 88.6% and 2.3%, respectively, in ERD; P = 0.363).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is equally beneficial to patients with NERD and ERD. Antireflux surgery should not be avoided for GERD patients without mucosal breaks on endoscopy as the evidence of erosive esophagitis.

Scintigraphic Evaluation of Esophageal Motility and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients Presenting with Upper Respiratory Tract Symptoms

Purpose of Study

The purpose is to evaluate the findings and utility of esophageal transit scintigraphy (ETS) and gastroesophageal reflux scintigraphy (GES) in patients presenting with upper respiratory tract (URT) symptoms suspected to be due to gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients aged between 19 and 60 years underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL), ETS, and GES. Correlation between GER, esophageal motility, and NPL was evaluated. Inclusion criteria include patients with recurrent URT symptoms such as chronic dry cough/hoarseness of voice and itching/foreign body sensation in throat. Those with typical gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of GER, URT symptoms relieved by antibiotics, surgical intervention in abdomen, cardiac/hepatobiliary diseases, etc. were excluded from the study.

Results

Significant correlation was found between GER and NPL in 28/30 patients. More the grade of reflux, more severe was the NPL findings. Two patients with Grade II reflux had normal NPL suggesting structural inflammatory changes due to acidic pH of refluxate which have not yet manifested or symptoms could be due to nonacid refluxate. Incidence of esophageal motility disorder was statistically significant in patients with GER disease (GERD). Patients who had symptoms, but no demonstrable GER showed delayed ET in supine position suggesting the presence of esophageal motility disorder even before GERD.

Conclusion

GES demonstrated GER in patients presenting with URT symptoms without typical GI symptoms. ETS showed coexistence of esophageal motility disorder in most patients presenting with URT symptoms even without an associated reflux disease. We hypothesize that primary abnormal esophageal motility leads to delayed esophageal clearance and consequently to URT symptoms. Addition of ETS to GES is easily feasible with no significant additional cost, time, or radiation burden.

Barrett’s esophagus in 2016: From pathophysiology to treatment

Esophageal complications caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus (BE). BE is a premalignant condition with an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The carcinogenic sequence may progress through several steps, from normal esophageal mucosa through BE to EAC. A recent advent of functional esophageal testing (particularly multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring) has helped to improve our knowledge about GERD pathophysiology, including its complications. Those findings (when properly confirmed) might help to predict BE neoplastic progression. Over the last few decades, the incidence of EAC has continued to rise in Western populations. However, only a minority of BE patients develop EAC, opening the debate regarding the cost-effectiveness of current screening/surveillance strategies. Thus, major efforts in clinical and research practice are focused on new methods for optimal risk assessment that can stratify BE patients at low or high risk of developing EAC, which should improve the cost effectiveness of screening/surveillance programs and consequently significantly affect health-care costs. Furthermore, the area of BE therapeutic management is rapidly evolving. Endoscopic eradication therapies have been shown to be effective, and new therapeutic options for BE and EAC have emerged. The aim of the present review article is to highlight the status of screening/surveillance programs and the current progress of BE therapy. Moreover, we discuss the recent introduction of novel esophageal pathophysiological exams that have improved the knowledge of the mechanisms linking GERD to BE.

Significance of the lower esophageal sphincter preservation in preventing alkaline reflux esophagitis in patients after total gastrectomy reconstructed by Roux-en-Y for gastric cancer

To clarify the significance of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) for prevention of alkaline reflux esophagitis (ARE) after total gastrectomy reconstructed by Roux-en-Y (TGRY) for gastric cancer, we investigated LES function and lower esophageal pH in TGRY patients with or without LES preservation. A total of 51 patients 5 years after TGRY were divided into groups A (26 patients without preserved LES) and B (25 patients with preserved LES) and compared with 22 control participants (group C). Manometric study and ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring were performed on all patients. Symptomatic and endoscopic AREs in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P < 0.05). The length of LES and maximum LES pressure in group A were significantly shorter and lower, respectively, than in groups B and C (P < 0.01). The length of LES and maximum LES pressure in patients with symptomatic ARE were significantly shorter and lower, respectively, than in patients without symptomatic ARE (P < 0.01). Percentages of time with pH >7 and pH >8 within 24 hours in group A were significantly higher than those in groups B and C (P < 0.01). Preservation of the LES may be necessary to prevent ARE after TGRY.

Dysmotility and reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, with the advent of new oesophageal testing [i.e. 24-h impedance-pH monitoring, combined impedance-manometry, high-resolution manometry (HRM)], relevant progress in understanding the mechanisms contributing to the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has been made, allowing a better management of patients with this disorder. The aim of our review is to report the state-of-the-art about oesophageal motor disorders in patients with reflux disease and to stimulate new research in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS), transient LOS relaxations, impairment of oesophagogastric junction including hiatal hernia, oesophageal bolus transit abnormalities and presence of ineffective oesophageal motility have been strongly implicated in GORD development. In particular, the majority of recent studies carried out with HRM and impedance-pH testing reported that these motor abnormalities are increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of GORD, from nonerosive reflux disease and erosive oesophagitis to Barrett's oesophagus.

SUMMARY

Defining and characterizing oesophageal dysmotility in patients with reflux disease is of maximum importance in order to properly diagnose these patients and to treat them with the best management of care. New studies are needed in order to better understand the physiomechanic basis of oesophageal dysmotility in GORD patients.

Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Esophageal motility abnormalities are among the main factors implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The recent introduction in clinical and research practice of novel esophageal testing has markedly improved our understanding of the mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease, allowing a better management of patients with this disorder. In this context, the present article intends to provide an overview of the current literature about esophageal motility dysfunctions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal manometry, by recording intraluminal pressure, represents the gold standard to diagnose esophageal motility abnormalities. In particular, using novel techniques, such as high resolution manometry with or without concurrent intraluminal impedance monitoring, transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations, hypotensive LES, ineffective esophageal peristalsis and bolus transit abnormalities have been better defined and strongly implicated in gastroesophageal reflux disease development. Overall, recent findings suggest that esophageal motility abnormalities are increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of reflux disease, from non-erosive reflux disease to erosive reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus. Characterizing esophageal dysmotility among different subgroups of patients with reflux disease may represent a fundamental approach to properly diagnose these patients and, thus, to set up the best therapeutic management. Currently, surgery represents the only reliable way to restore the esophagogastric junction integrity and to reduce transient LES relaxations that are considered to be the predominant mechanism by which gastric contents can enter the esophagus. On that ground, more in depth future studies assessing the pathogenetic role of dysmotility in patients with reflux disease are warranted.

Current advances in the diagnosis and treatment of nonerosive reflux disease

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is a distinct pattern of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is defined as a subcategory of GERD characterized by troublesome reflux-related symptoms in the absence of esophageal mucosal erosions/breaks at conventional endoscopy. In clinical practice, patients with reflux symptoms and negative endoscopic findings are markedly heterogeneous. The potential explanations for the symptom generation in NERD include microscopic inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity (stress and sleep), and sustained esophageal contractions. The use of 24-hour esophageal impedance and pH monitoring gives further insight into reflux characteristics and symptom association relevant to NERD. The treatment choice of NERD still relies on acid-suppression therapy. Initially, patients can be treated by a proton pump inhibitor (PPI; standard dose, once daily) for 2–4 weeks. If initial treatment fails to elicit adequate symptom control, increasing the PPI dose (standard dose PPI twice daily) is recommended. In patients with poor response to appropriate PPI treatment, 24-hour esophageal impedance and pH monitoring is indicated to differentiate acid-reflux-related NERD, weakly acid-reflux-related NERD (hypersensitive esophagus), nonacid-reflux-related NERD, and functional heartburn. The response is less effective in NERD as compared with erosive esophagitis.

Nonerosive Reflux Disease (NERD) - An Update

Recognizing nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) as a distinct presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was one of the most important developments in the field of GERD in the last decade. Whilst the definition of NERD has not changed significantly over the years, the disorder accounts for the majority of the GERD patients and those who failed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Recent developments in NERD focused primarily on understanding the pathophysiology and natural history. The introduction of esophageal impedance + pH has led to the assessment of other forms of gastroesophageal reflux in causing NERD. Therapeutic modalities still focus on acid suppression, but there is growing recognition that other therapeutic strategies should be considered in NERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: an Asian perspective

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) ranges from 2.5% to 7.1% in most population-based studies in Asia. There is evidence that GERD and its complications are rising, coinciding with a decline in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Asian GERD patients share similar risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms with their Western counterparts. Possible causes for the lower prevalence of GERD include less obesity and hiatus hernia, a lesser degree of esophageal dysmotility, a high prevalence of virulent strains of H. pylori, and low awareness. Owing to the lack of precise translation for 'heartburn' in most Asian languages, reflux symptoms are often overlooked or misinterpreted as dyspepsia or chest pain. Furthermore, a symptom-based diagnosis with a therapeutic trial of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) may be hampered by the high prevalence of H. pylori-related disease. The risk stratification for prompt endoscopy, use of a locally-validated, diagnostic symptom questionnaire, and response to H. pylori'test and treat' help improve the accuracy of the PPI test for diagnoses. PPI remain the gold standard treatment, and 'on-demand' PPI have been shown to be a cost-effective, long-term treatment. The clinical course of GERD is benign in most patients in Asia. The risk of progression from non-erosive reflux disease to erosive esophagitis is low, and treatment response to a conventional dose of PPI is generally higher. Although H. pylori eradication may lead to more resilient GERD in a subset of patients, the benefits of H. pylori eradication outweigh the risks, especially in Asian populations with a high incidence of gastric cancer.

Racial and geographic issues in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disorder that is associated with a huge economic burden in the western countries and significantly decreased quality of life. This review focuses on the various multicultural issues in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of GERD. The prevalence of GERD appears to be highest in North America and Europe, whereas epidemiologic data from the Indian subcontinent, Africa, South America, and the Middle East are sparse. A limited number of studies have elucidated ethnic differences in GERD in multiracial populations. African Americans and Asians appear to be at a lower risk for the development of complicated GERD including Barrett's esophagus (BE). Whether the pathophysiology of GERD differs among different populations remains to be answered satisfactorily. It appears that most of the factors involved in the pathogenesis of GERD, as described in western populations, are present in Asians but at a lower scale. The current recommendations for the management of GERD by the American College of Gastroenterology may not meet the need for different ethnic groups or for different geographic regions. Recognition of language barriers in understanding the common terms used to describe reflux symptoms should be borne in mind while treating GERD patients with different ethnic backgrounds. In addition, a universally accepted definition for treatment success in GERD patients is lacking. Given the negative impact on health-related quality of life, significant cost ramifications, and increased risk for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, the study of multicultural issues in GERD should be considered.

The nonerosive reflux disease-gastroesophageal reflux disease controversy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To analyse the concept of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), examining its evolving definition and its relationship to reflux disease and functional gastrointestinal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of the Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the Rome III definition of functional upper gastrointestinal disorders has refined the concept of NERD. The high prevalence of GERD symptoms and the strong overlap between GERD and irritable bowel syndrome is due to the influence of NERD. Subtle differences exist between patterns of acid exposure in NERD and erosive disease on pH testing. Symptom generation in NERD may be influenced by altered mucosal permeability. Improvements in endoscopic technology demonstrate esophageal mucosal changes in NERD which are not seen in controls. There is a general acknowledgement that the inferior symptomatic response to acid suppression reported in NERD is attributable, at least in part, to contamination of study populations by patients with functional heartburn.

SUMMARY

NERD is common and its definition continues to evolve. For the present, however, this should be considered to be heartburn with and without regurgitation due to gastroesophageal reflux in the absence of esophageal mucosal erosions. Future studies examining treatment response of GERD subgroups must exclude functional heartburn if NERD is to be properly understood.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia: a condition in evolution

Widespread epidemiological changes, rising prevalence and gradual shifts in patterns of disease manifestations: this is the changing face of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Asia. Are we witnessing a disease in evolution or merely the result of increased and more accurate case reporting that comes with advancing diagnostic technology, better medical facilities and heightened awareness of the disease? Do the figures reported really reflect the actual scenario or is there more to it than meets the eye? In this article, we take you back in time to review relevant developments over the past decade or so. We will draw on findings from across Asia, take an in-depth look at prevailing trends and patterns and examine some of the most plausible explanations behind the dynamics of this epidemiological transition.

A rat surgical model of esophageal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma-induced by mixed reflux of gastric acid and duodenal contents

Recent clinical data have revealed that mixed reflux (MR) of gastric acid and duodenal contents frequently occurs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a progressive increase of MR occurs with increasing severity across gastroesophageal reflux disease. Herein we report a novel rat surgical model in which esophageal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma develop as complications of MR. The model was created by performing an esophagojejunostomy and a gastrojejunostomy 5 mm proximal to the esophagojejunal anastomosis in 40 rats. Severe inflammatory and proliferative changes, high prevalence of esophageal metaplasia (78%), and adenocarcinoma (50%) were observed in the lower part of the esophagus of rats 20 weeks after surgery. The resulting esophageal lesions resembled those described in humans and supported a progression from intestinal metaplasia to dysplasia and, ultimately, esophageal adenocarcinoma. Such a model may provide a useful tool in study of human reflux-induced carcinogenesis.

Erosive esophagitis in the Philippines: a comparison between two time periods

BACKGROUND

In Asia, the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosed through endoscopy has increased from 3-9% to 14-16% in the last decade. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of erosive esophagitis (EE) over a span of 10 years in a tertiary care facility in the Philippines.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with EE from 1994 to 1997 (period A) and from 2000 to 2003 (period B) were included in the study. The modified Savary-Miller and Los Angeles classifications were used to grade EE for periods A and B, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 15 981 upper endoscopies were evaluated for this study. There was no significant difference in the male: female ratio (period A 1.43:1 vs period B 1.25:1, P = 0.459) and in the mean age of patients with EE (period A 46.4 vs period B 47.5, P = 0.395). The prevalence of EE was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in period B (6.3%) as compared to period A (2.9%). However, despite a higher prevalence, more patients had mild esophagitis in period B as compared to period A. Conversely, there were more patients with esophageal ulcers (18.6%vs 5.9%, P < 0.001), esophageal strictures (2.3%vs 0%, P = 0.003), and hiatal hernia (15.8%vs 7.5%, P = 0.001) in period A. The presence of concomitant Barrett's esophagus was not significantly different between the two time periods (period A 3.2%vs period B 5%, P = 0.367).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of EE was higher in 2000-2003 than in 1994-1997, although the complications associated with the disease diminished. The prevalence of concomitant Barrett's esophagus remained stable.

Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive esophagitis are the main presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, NERD is the most common presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease in community-based patients. Patients with NERD differ in demographic characteristics from patients with erosive esophagitis, primarily in sex distribution, weight/body mass index, and prevalence of hiatal hernia. Physiologically, patients with NERD tend to have normal lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, minimal esophageal body motility abnormalities, low esophageal acid exposure profile and minimal nighttime esophageal acid exposure. Patients with NERD have a lower symptom response rate to proton pump inhibitor once daily than patients with erosive esophagitis. Additionally, NERD patients demonstrate a longer lag-time for symptom resolution and lack of difference in symptom response rate between half to full dose proton pump inhibitor as compared with patients with erosive esophagitis.

H pylori infection and reflux oesophagitis: A case-control study

AIM: To examine the relationship between H pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in Iran.

METHODS: In this study 51 GORD patients (referred to endoscopy at Taleghani hospital) were compared with 49 age-sex matched controls. Diagnosis of H pylori was made by gastric mucosal biopsy and rapid urease test (positive if the result of one or both diagnostic methods was positive). Updated Sydney system was used to report histopathological changes.

RESULTS: The frequency of H pylori infection based on rapid urease test and histology was 88.2% (45) in patients and 77.6% (38) in controls, which showed no significant difference. The frequency of H pylori infection was significantly higher in the antrum than in the corpus and cardia. The mean activity, inflammation, and gastritis scores were also higher in the antrum of patients than in the antrum of controls. The mean scores were significantly higher in the corpus of controls than in the corpus of patients. Diffuse active gastritis was observed in a significantly larger number of controls, while the frequency of diffuse chronic gastritis was higher in patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of other histological findings between patients and controls.

CONCLUSION: H pylori infection cannot prevent GORD in this region.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asian countries: disorder of nature or nurture?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is less prevalent in Asia than in the West, but there is now evidence to suggest that its frequency is rapidly rising in Asia. The different prevalence rates reported in various Asian studies may represent different points in the 'rising' phase of GERD. The cause for the lower but increasing prevalence of GERD in Asia is not known, but genetics and to some extent environmental factors, may have initially protected Asians against GERD. However, with the recent globalization of economies, the associated lifestyle changes in many developing Asian countries may have tipped the balance in favor of the development of GERD.

A comparison of the clinical, demographic and psychiatric profiles among patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease in a multi-ethnic Asian country

AIM: To examine the clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and compare erosive (ERD) with non-erosive (NERD) in terms of clinical, demographic and psychiatric profiles.

METHODS: Patients with reflux symptoms were enrolled and stratified to NERD and ERD after endoscopy (LA classification). Patients with ERD presenting with dyspepsia were included. Patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or H₂ receptor antagonists before endoscopy were excluded. Demographic data, Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) status and presence of minor psychiatric morbidity (based on General Health Questionnaire-28) were analyzed.

RESULTS: Among 690 patients screened, 533 were eligible for analysis (male to female ratio: 3:2; Chinese: 75.4%; Malay: 9.8%; Indian: 14.8%). Clinical spectrum of GERD: N: 40.5%; A: 46%; B: 9.2%; C: 2.1%; D: 0.6%; Barrett’s esophagus: 1.7%. Compared to patients with NERD, patients with ERD were significantly older (45 vs 39.4 years), more likely to be male (64.4% vs 53.7%), tended to smoke (19.6% vs 9.7%), less likely to have minor psychiatric morbidity (26.4 vs 46.7%) and were more likely to respond to PPI (79.7 vs 66.8%). There was also a trend towards a higher BMI (24.5 vs 23.5). Race, alcohol consumption and H pylori status were not significant. On multivariate analysis, age and presence of minor psychiatric morbidity remained with significant differences.

CONCLUSION: The majority of patients who have typical symptoms of GERD have NERD or mild erosive reflux disease. Compared to patients with erosive reflux disease, patients with NERD were younger and had a higher prevalence of minor psychiatric morbidity.

Effect of reflux and esophagitis on esophageal volume and acid clearance in piglets

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The study investigates esophageal motor function and esophageal clearance immediately after surgical induction of reflux in piglets and 8 weeks later after peptic esophagitis has developed.

METHODS

Twenty-four sedated, nonintubated piglets were divided into three groups: sham (laparotomy only), reflux (distal esophageal myotomy), and reflux + esophagitis (8 weeks after myotomy). All animals underwent stationary manometry of the esophagus with a four-lumen perfused assembly after injection of 1-, 2-, and 3-mL boluses of saline and acid into the proximal esophagus. Simultaneous pH monitoring allowed assessment of acid clearance. Wave features and clearance times after saline and acid were compared among groups.

RESULTS

There were minor changes in peristaltic activity of the esophagus after saline boluses in animals with reflux. Acid clearance time was prolonged, especially the time to re-establish resting esophageal pH, in animals with esophagitis. These changes, which were volume-dependent, were related to the loss of peristaltic organization of the esophageal waves. The esophageal wave frequency, amplitude, and duration were only slightly changed by the induction of reflux and by esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The esophagus affected by acid reflux, with or without esophagitis, was capable of near-normal motor responses after boluses of saline. Reflux impaired the peristaltic response to acid, and the effect was more pronounced when reflux and esophagitis were both present. The acid clearance time was also strikingly prolonged in the presence of reflux and esophagitis. The results suggest that long episodes of reflux seen on pH tracings from individuals with esophagitis might be secondary both to acid-related motor dysfunction and large volumes of refluxate.

Alteration of esophageal motility in elderly patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To study the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and esophageal motility in elderly gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS: Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring were performed in 40 elderly and 42 non-elderly patients of GERD, in which 21 cases were with reflux esophagitis (RE) and 21 with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) confirmed by endoscopy.

RESULTS: Elderly RE and NERD patients had lower LESP(1.0±0.79 and 1.16±0.90 kPa) than elderly control group (1.72±0.58 kPa) and non-elderly control group (1.96±0.49 kPa), respectively (P < 0.01). The pressure of lower esophageal peristalsis wave (LEPP) and upper esophageal peristalsis wave (UEPP) were (4.94±2.23 kPa) and (4.20± 1.75 kPa) in elderly RE, and (2.64±3.32 kPa) and (4.58± 2.33 kPa) in elderly NERD. They were lower than elderly control group (10.22±4.55 kPa) and (6.86±2.11 kPa) (P < 0.01). In elderly RE and NERD, the frequency of non-conductivity and reverse peristalsis wave was higher than that in control group (P < 0.01). The seven parameters of pH monitoring were significantly higher in elderly RE and NERD than control group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: There is some disturbance of esophageal motility in elderly RE and NERD. The disturbance of esophageal motility in elderly RE and NERD is more severe than that in non-elderly patients.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease at the turn of millennium

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been an area of active research in the Asia-Pacific region in the recent years. This article outlines some of the interesting research findings. It comprises three parts. The first part dealt with recent data on the changing epidemiology of GERD in Asia. The second part summarized published studies on the relationship between GERD and Helicobacter pylori, relevant to the Asia-Pacific region. The last part discussed some of the recent advances in the treatment of GERD.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and its association with the disease.

DESIGN

Systematic review of studies reporting the prevalence of H pylori in patients with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases, searched to November 2001, experts, pharmaceutical companies, and journals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Odds ratio for prevalence of H pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

20 studies were included. The pooled estimate of the odds ratio for prevalence of H pylori was 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.78), indicating a lower prevalence in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Substantial heterogeneity was observed between studies. Location seemed to be an important factor, with a much lower prevalence of H pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in studies from the Far East, despite a higher overall prevalence of infection than western Europe and North America. Year of study was not a source of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of H pylori infection was significantly lower in patients with than without gastro-oesophageal reflux, with geographical location being a strong contributor to the heterogeneity between studies. Patients from the Far East with reflux disease had a lower prevalence of H pylori infection than patients from western Europe and North America, despite a higher prevalence in the general population.

Esophageal motor dysfunction persists in children after surgical cure of reflux: an ambulatory manometric study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Esophageal dysmotility shown by perfusion manometry in children with gastroesophageal reflux can be primary or acquired. This study examines by combined ambulatory pH-metry and manometry the nature of motor dysfunction and whether it improves after surgical cure of reflux.

METHODS

Sixteen refluxing children aged 131 +/- 54 months were studied by combined ambulatory pH-metry and manometry before and more than 6 months after successful fundoplication. pH-metric and manometric variables were compared at both time end-points by paired statistical tests accepting a significance level of P less than.05.

RESULTS

Operation cured all patients clinically and pH-metrically, but, in spite of this, only the frequency of motor sequences decreased significantly after the operation from 1 (0.45) to 0.8 (0.6) waves per minute (median [interquartile range]). Wave amplitude and duration were similar in both conditions; the proportion of peristaltic waves was normal and did not change before and after the operation (79.5% [17.25] v 81.4% [21.5]; not significant), whereas the proportions of complete (63.2% [17.5] v 67.8% [19.3]; not significant) and effective (32.4% [31.95] v 27.25% [22.5]; not significant) waves were definitely low and remained so after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The esophagus of children with GER has mild disturbances of peristaltic activity with waves often incomplete, weak, and scarcely effective. Dismotility does not improve after successful fundoplication suggesting that it could be a primary phenomenon.

Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease: lack of influence of infection on twenty-four-hour esophageal pH monitoring and endoscopic findings

The precise role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a matter of intense debate. Twenty-four-hour esophageal pH monitoring has a higher accuracy than endoscopy for the diagnosis of GERD, but the correlation between H. pylori infection and esophageal pH-metric parameters has almost never been assessed. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between the infection and the presence of disturbances not only in endoscopy but also in 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. One hundred consecutive patients undergoing 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring because of symptoms suggestive of GERD were included in the study. Esophageal manometry was carried out to study the position and the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Prevalence of H. pylori infection was evaluated by histology (hematoxylin and eosin stain) and rapid urease test. The mean age of the patients was 50 +/- 15 years; 50% were men and 56% had an abnormal pH-metry (DeMeester score more than 14.7). The prevalence of H. pylori in patients with abnormal pH-metry was 57% (95% CI, 42-70%) and was 52% (95% CI, 39-64%) in those with normal pH-metry (nonsignificant differences [NS]). In the multivariate analysis, H. pylori infection did not correlate with an abnormal pH-metry (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-1.8; NS). The proportion of cases with abnormal pH-metry among infected patients was 54% (95% CI, 41-66%) and was 59% (95% CI, 44-72%) among uninfected patients (NS). Mean values of pH-metric parameters (+/-SD), respectively for H. pylori-positive and -negative patients, were total score (30 +/- 33 vs. 36 +/- 38), number of reflux episodes (7 +/- 7 vs. 11 +/- 11), number of episodes more than 5 minutes (3.7 +/- 5 vs. 3.8 +/- 5), longest reflux episode (2.4 +/- 2 minutes vs. 3.1 +/- 3 minutes), and fraction time (%) with pH less than 4 (total, 6 +/- 7 vs. 6.8 +/- 8; upright, 3.9 +/- 4 vs. 4.5 +/- 5; supine, 7.4 +/- 12 vs. 7.2 +/- 10) (all findings were NS). Endoscopic findings, respectively for H. pylori-positive and -negative, were hiatus hernia (41% vs. 41%), endoscopic esophagitis (Savary-Miller) (54% vs. 46%), and Barrett's esophagus (15% vs. 11%) (all findings were NS). Finally, differences were not demonstrated in the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (12 +/- 8 mmHg vs. 14 +/- 12 mmHg) among H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. H. pylori infection is not associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, as evaluated endoscopically and with 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.