Tegaserod, a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptor partial agonist, is devoid of electrocardiographic effects

Prokinetics-safety and efficacy: The European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility/The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society expert review

BACKGROUND

Prokinetics are a class of pharmacological drugs designed to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility, either regionally or across the whole gut. Each drug has its merits and drawbacks, and based on current evidence as high-quality studies are limited, we have no clear recommendation on one class or other. However, there remains a large unmet need for both regionally selective and/or globally acting prokinetic drugs that work primarily intraluminally and are safe and without systemic side effects.

PURPOSE

Here, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of six classes of prokinetic drugs, including their pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, safety and tolerability and potential indications.

Gastroparesis syndromes: emerging drug targets and potential therapeutic opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Gastroparesis (Gp) and related disorders such as chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting and functional dyspepsia, known as gastropareis syndromes (GpS), have large unmet needs. Mainstays of GpS treatments are diet and drugs.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to explore potential new medications and other therapies for gastroparesis. Before discussing possible new drugs, the currently used drugs are discussed. These include dopamine receptor antagonists, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists and antagonists, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists and other anti-emetics. The article also considers future drugs that may be used for Gp, based on currently known pathophysiology.

EXPERT OPINION

Gaps in knowledge about the pathophysiology of gastroparesis and related syndromes are critical to developing therapeutic agents that will be successful. Recent major developments in the gastroparesis arena are related to microscopic anatomy, cellular function, and pathophysiology. The major challenges moving forward will be to develop the genetic and biochemical correlates of these major developments in gastroparesis research.

Tegaserod: What's Old Is New Again

Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) are common gastrointestinal disorders imposing considerable impact on the quality of life and well-being of affected individuals. A paucity of evidence-based treatment options exist for CIC and IBS-C sufferers. Tegaserod, a 5-HT₄ agonist, has a substantial body of preclinical and clinical study evidence to support its beneficial role in modulating sensorimotor function of the luminal gastrointestinal tract. Tegaserod was first approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the management of IBS-C and CIC in 2002 and 2004, respectively. Tegaserod enjoyed a successful uptake in the management of these disorders during its first several years of availability in the United States, but was later withdrawn from the market in 2007 over concerns related to adverse cardiovascular events. Since then, additional safety data has been generated, and following a resubmission and review by the Food and Drug Administration, in April 2019, tegaserod was once again approved for use in IBS-C under a more restricted labeling, confining use to women under 65 years of age without heart disease or additional cardiovascular risk factors. This review summarizes the regulatory journey of tegaserod and details the existing pharmacokinetic, physiologic, clinical, and safety data of tegaserod generated over the last 2 decades. The discussion also examines the future of tegaserod in the treatment of these constipation disorders, as well as its potential role in other related disorders of brain-gut interaction.

Re-evaluation of the Cardiovascular Safety Profile of Tegaserod: A Review of the Clinical Data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Tegaserod is a 5-HT₄ receptor agonist approved for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in women <65 years of age without a history of cardiovascular ischemic events. Safety data are presented from 2 external adjudications from the 2018 Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee meeting supporting tegaserod's reintroduction after its voluntary 2007 withdrawal. Withdrawal was based on an internal adjudication using pooled placebo-controlled tegaserod data to identify potential cardiovascular ischemic signals.

METHODS

An independent committee conducted an external adjudication to evaluate 24 possible cardiovascular ischemic events (tegaserod: n = 20; placebo: n = 4) identified internally. A second independent external adjudication further evaluated these events.

RESULTS

A total of 18,645 patients were included (tegaserod: n = 11,614; placebo: n = 7031). The first adjudication identified 14 (0.075%) events (tegaserod: n = 13 [0.11%]; placebo: n = 1 [0.014%]). All patients had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, and 11 had ≥2. The second adjudication identified 390 events, 24 (0.13%) were classified as probable new or worsening events (tegaserod: 18 [0.16%]; placebo: 6 [0.09%]). For tegaserod, 7 (0.06%) were coronary or cerebrovascular ischemic events compared with 1 (0.01%) for placebo (odds ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-34.74; P = .273). All tegaserod patients reporting cardiovascular events had ≥1 risk, including cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, ≥55 years of age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking. Women <65 years of age without a history of cardiovascular ischemic events and ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor receiving tegaserod experienced no major adverse cardiovascular event(s).

CONCLUSIONS

Two independent, external adjudications suggest that tegaserod is safe for women <65 years of age with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, no history of cardiovascular ischemic events, and ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor.

Tegaserod for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Background: Tegaserod (Zelnorm®) is a 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) type 4 receptor agonist for the treatment of hypomotility disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract associated with the irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C).

Objective: The authors provide the reader with a better understanding on tegaserod mechanism of action, on its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties, on safety and tolerability, with a summary of the key published clinical trials conducted in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Its effects on colon inflammation have also been described.

Results: Tegaserod was withdrawn in 2007 due to increased risks of cardiovascular adverse effects. The manufacturer denied this, because pre-existing cardiovascular disease or risk factors were attributed to all affected patients. Thus, no causal relationship between tegaserod use and cardiovascular events was clearly shown. A matched case-control study of tegaserod-treated with untreated patients found no association between tegaserod and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite its adverse effects, tegaserod resulted to be effective in treating chronic constipation in adult women aged < 65 years with IBS-C, while the safety and effectiveness of tegaserod in men with IBS-C have not been established.

Conclusion: Tegaserod was resubmitted to the Food and Drug Administration in 2018 for use in a low-risk population. Moreover, tegaserod has also been shown to improve symptoms, enhance gastric accommodation and significantly attenuate visceral pain arising from the colon in functional dyspepsia patients. Treatment with tegaserod seems also to exert a protective effect in inflamed colons, reducing the severity of colitis in animal models.

Constipation and Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and management of primary constipation and fecal incontinence in the elderly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among elderly people, 6.5%, 1.7%, and 1.1% have functional constipation, constipation-predominant IBS, and opioid-induced constipation. In elderly people, the number of colonic enteric neurons and smooth muscle functions is preserved; decreased cholinergic function with unopposed nitrergic relaxation may explain colonic motor dysfunction. Less physical activity or dietary fiber intake and postmenopausal hormonal therapy are risk factors for fecal incontinence in elderly people. Two thirds of patients with fecal incontinence respond to biofeedback therapy. Used in combination, loperamide and biofeedback therapy are more effective than placebo, education, and biofeedback therapy. Vaginal or anal insert devices are another option. In the elderly, constipation and fecal incontinence are common and often distressing symptoms that can often be managed by addressing bowel disturbances. Selected diagnostic tests, prescription medications, and, infrequently, surgical options should be considered when necessary.

Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND

The nonselective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, cisapride and tegaserod have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events (AEs).

AIM

To perform a systematic review of the safety profile, particularly cardiovascular, of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders, and a nonsystematic summary of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Articles reporting data on cisapride, clebopride, prucalopride, mosapride, renzapride, tegaserod, TD-5108 (velusetrag) and ATI-7505 (naronapride) were identified through a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Toxfile. Abstracts from UEGW 2006-2008 and DDW 2008-2010 were searched for these drug names, and pharmaceutical companies approached to provide unpublished data.

RESULTS

Retrieved articles on pharmacokinetics, human pharmacodynamics and clinical data with these 5-HT(4) agonists, are reviewed and summarised nonsystematically. Articles relating to cardiac safety and tolerability of these agents, including any relevant case reports, are reported systematically. Two nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists had reports of cardiovascular AEs: cisapride (QT prolongation) and tegaserod (ischaemia). Interactions with, respectively, the hERG cardiac potassium channel and 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes have been suggested to account for these effects. No cardiovascular safety concerns were reported for the newer, selective 5-HT(4) agonists prucalopride, velusetrag, naronapride, or for nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists with no hERG or 5-HT(1) affinity (renzapride, clebopride, mosapride).

CONCLUSIONS

5-HT(4) agonists for GI disorders differ in chemical structure and selectivity for 5-HT(4) receptors. Selectivity for 5-HT(4) over non-5-HT(4) receptors may influence the agent's safety and overall risk-benefit profile. Based on available evidence, highly selective 5-HT(4) agonists may offer improved safety to treat patients with impaired GI motility.

Serotonin receptor modulators in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

The aim of this article is to review the pathophysiology and clinical role of serotonin receptor modulators used in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Serotonin is an important monoamine neurotransmitter that plays a key role in the initiation of peristaltic and secretory refl exes, and in modulation of visceral sensations. Several serotonin receptor subtypes have been characterized, of which 5HT3, 5HT4, and 5HT1b are the most important for GI function. 5HT4 agonists (eg, tegaserod) potentiate peristalsis initiated by 5HT1 receptor stimulation. 5HT4 agonists are therefore useful in constipation predominant form of IBS and in chronic constipation. 5HT3 antagonists (Alosetron and Cilansetron) prevent the activation of 5HT3 receptors on extrinsic afferent neurons and can decrease the visceral pain associated with IBS. These agents also retard small intestinal and colonic transit, and are therefore useful in diarrhea-predominant IBS. Tegaserod has been demonstrated in several randomized, placebo controlled trials to relieve global IBS symptoms as well as individual symptoms of abdominal discomfort, number of bowel movements and stool consistency. Several randomized, controlled trials have shown that alosetron relieves pain, improves bowel function, and provides global symptom improvement in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. However, ischemic colitis and severe complications of constipation have been major concerns leading to voluntary withdrawal of Alosetron from the market followed by remarketing with a comprehensive risk management program.

Electrophysiological characterization of isolated human atrial myocytes exposed to tegaserod

Tegaserod (Teg), a 5-hydroxytryptamine type-4 (5-HT(4)) receptor partial agonist, represents a novel treatment for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and chronic constipation. Cardiovascular safety data from pooled clinical studies showed a signal suggestive of increased occurrence of ischaemic cardiovascular events in patients exposed to Teg versus placebo. Thereafter, marketing of Teg was suspended in the USA and other countries. The clinical data did not demonstrate a causative effect but raised questions of whether a non-recognized effect on the heart was present. Our aim was to evaluate for arrhythmogenic potential of Teg on human cardiomyocytes. Cells isolated from human atrial specimens during cardiac surgery were used to assess the effects of Teg (1, 10, 30 and 100 nM) on action potential and I(f) (funny current) by patch-clamp technique. Results showed that Teg (at all concentrations tested) did not significantly affect action potential characteristics of atrial myocytes when driven at different rates (0.2, 0.5 and 1 Hz). In contrast, 5HT significantly prolonged action potential duration (1 and 10 nM) and caused cell un-excitability (100 nM). Teg, at the highest concentration tested (100 nM, corresponding to 10 times C(max), produced by the recommended dose of 6 mg b.i.d.) increased the I(f) amplitude and caused a shift of its activation curve. This effect of a high concentration of Teg is not considered clinically relevant. When evaluated on single human atrial cells, Teg does not appear to exhibit arrhythmogenic properties, as it did not affect the action potential profile.

Lack of Association of Tegaserod With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in a Matched Case-Control Study

Tegaserod is a first-in class selective serotonin 4 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. In March 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) suspended its use citing increased cardiovascular (CV) events in clinical trials. However, there is no known mechanistic basis for an adverse CV effect. To reassess the CV safety of tegaserod, teagaserod-treated patients (pts) in the Intermountain Healthcare database were identified (n = 2603), matched 1:6 with untreated (n = 15,618) patients by age, sex, and date of tegaserod initiation, and followed for an average of 2.5 years. Age averaged 38.6 ± 13.5 years, and 94% were female. Cardiovascular event rates were low and similar in patients treated with tegaserod and matched untreated patients. For the primary composite CV endpoint, 54 (0.35%) untreated and 12 (0.46%) treated pts had an event (treated OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.68-2.38, P =.46), with 7 and 0 events, respectively, occurring within 3 months. A total of 12 (0.1%) untreated and 1 (<0.1%) treated pts were hospitalized for a myocardial infarction (MI). 36 (0.2%) untreated and 10 (0.4%) treated pts for a cardiovascular accident, and 1 pt in each group for unstable angina. A total of 6 (<0.1%) untreated and no treated pts died from cardiac causes. Event rates were comparable to expected rates in this population of mostly premenopausal women. This large epidemiologic study failed to confirm a reported large event differential for tegaserod that was noted incidentally in a clinical trials database, suggesting that the prior observation may have been due to chance.

Diabetic gastroparesis: diagnosis and management

Gastric emptying is frequently abnormal in patients with long-standing type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Symptoms commonly associated with disordered gastric emptying include nausea, vomiting, bloating and epigastric pain, while patients are also at risk of malnutrition, weight loss, impaired drug absorption, disordered glycaemic control and poor quality of life. Although often attributed to the presence of irreversible autonomic neuropathy, acute hyperglycaemia represents a potentially reversible cause of gastric dysfunction in diabetes. Scintigraphy represents the gold standard for measuring gastric emptying. The management of diabetic gastroparesis is less than optimal, partly because the pathogenesis has not been clearly defined. Treatment approaches include dietary modification and optimization of glycaemia, and the use of prokinetic drugs, while novel therapies such as gastric electrical stimulation are the subject of ongoing investigation.

Pharmacotherapy of gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is a relatively common and often disabling condition that is characterized by a broad range of clinical presentation ranging from dyspeptic symptoms to nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, malnutrition, frequent hospitalizations and incapacitation. The treatment of gastroparetic symptoms can be challenging to the gastroenterologist and the intensity of therapy varies with the physician's knowledge. Hence the determination that a patient is refractory to 'standard medical therapy' is an assessment that is subspeciality-based and could differ around the world depending on medications available. In this article, we review the use of available prokinetics, antiemetic agents, the approach for analgesia in the context of gastroparesis, and also discuss potential and evolving pharmacotherapies. The progress has been relatively limited as far as availability of new medications for gastroparesis is concerned; however, active research in developing newer prokinetics holds great promise for the future of management of this challenging entity.

Treatment of refractory gastroparesis: gastric and jejunal tubes, botox, gastric electrical stimulation, and surgery

Refractory gastroparesis is a challenging disorder for gastroenterologists, internists, surgeons, and all health care professionals involved in the care of these patients. It should be managed by a stepwise algorithm beginning with dietary modifications, then prokinetic and antiemetic medications, measures to control pain and address psychological issues, and endoscopic or surgical options in selected patients, including placement of feeding jejunostomy tubes.

A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation

BACKGROUND

Problems of compliance, quality, and safety of colon preparation regimens have prompted continued investigation with alternative forms of cleansing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of tegaserod as an adjunct to a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), given as a whole dose or split dose, in colonoscopy preparation.

DESIGN

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

SETTING

A single university-based hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients who were undergoing elective colonoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

A 4-arm randomization scheme that compared tegaserod with a placebo, each with whole-dose or split-dose PEG-E preparation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Efficacy of colon cleansing was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included adherence, tolerability, adverse effects, and patient perceptions of their preparation quality.

RESULTS

A total of 382 patients completed the trial. Patients who received the split-dose preparation had significantly better colon cleansing than those who received the whole-dose preparation (88.9% vs 42.6%, P < .001). The addition of tegaserod did not significantly improve the overall colonoscopy preparation quality compared with a placebo. However, there were fewer poor preparations in the whole-dose PEG-E group (12.4% vs 1.1%, P = .002, Bonferroni correction removes significance) and more excellent preparations in the split-dose group (53.3% vs 38.3%, P = .035, Bonferroni correction removes significance) in favor of tegaserod. Interobserver and intraobserver variability analysis showed substantial agreement among endoscopists. Adherence was significantly lower in the whole-dose group versus the split-dose PEG-E group (68.8% vs 91%, P < .001), independent of the use of tegaserod. Adverse effects were not different between study groups.

LIMITATIONS

A 4-arm randomization and the single-center nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegaserod has a marginal effect on the quality of colonoscopy preparation when used as an adjuvant to PEG-E. The split-dose PEG-E was superior to the whole-dose PEG-E and resulted in better colon cleansing, adherence, and tolerance.

The in vitro pharmacological profile of TD-5108, a selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonist with high intrinsic activity

The in vitro pharmacological profile of TD-5108, a novel, selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, was compared to that of clinically efficacious gastroprokinetic 5-HT(4) receptor agonists. TD-5108 produced an elevation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate in human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing the human recombinant 5-HT(4(c)) (h5-HT(4(c))) receptor (pEC(50) = 8.3) and 5-HT(4) receptor-mediated relaxation of the rat esophagus (pEC(50) = 7.9) and contraction of the guinea pig colon (pEC(50) = 7.9). In all in vitro assays, TD-5108 was a high intrinsic activity agonist, unlike tegaserod, mosapride, and cisapride which, in the majority of test systems, had lower intrinsic activity. TD-5108 had high affinity (pK (i) = 7.7) and selectivity (> or =25-fold) for h5-HT(4(c)) receptors over other biogenic amine receptors. TD-5108 was >500-fold selective over other 5-HT receptors (including h5-HT(2B) and h5-HT(3A)) and, at 3 microM, had no effect on human ether-à-go-go-related gene K+ channels. In conclusion, TD-5108 is a selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonist in vitro. The high intrinsic activity and preferential binding of TD-5108 to 5-HT4 over other 5-HT receptors may result in an improved clinical profile for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders of reduced motility.

Syndrome de l'intestin irritable: options thérapeutiques actuelles

Relieving abdominal pain is the principal treatment objective for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. No single drug stands out in the treatment strategy for this illness. Antispasmodics, magnesium aluminum silicates, and alverine citrate drugs all remain initial options for treatment, although their prescription is impeded by the fact that an increasing number are no longer approved for reimbursement. Increased dietary fibers often have a harmful effect on symptoms. Some patients are probably intolerant to some foods but there is no satisfactory proof on which to base a restrictive diet. Improved knowledge of the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome has made it possible to diversify treatments that act first on one of the key pathophysiologic elements, visceral hypersensitivity. Antidepressants (especially tricyclics) can be used at low doses. Among the serotonergic drugs, serotonin 5-HT4 receptors agonists (tegaserod) may be available soon, but the development of 5-HT3 antagonists (alosetron, cilansetron) has been stopped for safety reasons (ischemic colitis and severe constipation). Non-drug options such as hypnosis, psychotherapy, relaxation, or yoga, may also be proposed to some patients. Probiotics are a possible treatment in the future.

Tegaserod for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation

BACKGROUND

IBS is a complex disorder that encompasses a wide profile of symptoms. The symptoms of chronic constipation frequently resemble those of constipation-predominant IBS. Current drug treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are of limited value. Many target specific symptoms only. Tegaserod, a 5HT(4) partial agonist, represents a novel mechanism of action in the treatment of IBS and chronic constipation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tegaserod for the treatment of IBS and chronic constipation in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and above.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE 1966-December 2006 and EMBASE 1980 to December 2006 were searched. The text and key words used included "tegaserod", "HTF 919", "irritable bowel", "constipation" and "colonic diseases, functional". The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Review Group Specialized Trials Register were also searched. Searches stopped on 15th December 2006. Relevant articles were retrieved, and their reference lists were also reviewed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing tegaserod with placebo, no treatment or any other intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmacological) in subjects aged 12 years and above with a diagnosis of IBS or chronic constipation, focusing on clinical endpoints were considered for review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study inclusion and exclusion, data extraction and quality assessment was undertaken by two authors independently. Meta-analysis was performed where study populations, designs, outcomes, and statistical reporting allowed combination of data in a valid way, using the summary statistics relative risk for dichotomous data and weighted mean difference for continuous data, both with 95% CI. Thirteen short-term placebo-controlled studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These were predominantly conducted in women. Ten studies evaluated the efficacy of tegaserod on global gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients with constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS). One small study evaluated safety in patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS. Two studies evaluated the effectiveness of tegaserod for the treatment of chronic constipation.

MAIN RESULTS

In patients with C-IBS, the relative risk (RR) of being a responder in terms of global relief of GI symptoms during the last 4 weeks of treatment was significantly higher with both tegaserod 12 mg and 4 mg doses compared with placebo. Although the pooled results indicate statistically significant benefit with tegaserod, the a priori minimal clinically important differences set in two of three studies were not reached. The responder rate for this endpoint was also higher when considered for the first 4 weeks of treatment (tegaserod 12 mg only). Tegaserod did not significantly improve the patients' individual symptoms of abdominal pain and discomfort although bowel habit showed a statistically significant improvement with tegaserod 4 mg and there was a non-significant trend in this outcome in favour of tegaserod 12 mg. In patients with chronic constipation, the RR of being a responder in terms of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week with tegaserod 12 mg was 1.54 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.75), WMD for this endpoint compared with placebo 0.6 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.78). Differences between tegaserod and placebo in increases in frequency of bowel movements were small (less than one per week). The proportion of patients with either diagnosis who experienced diarrhea was significantly higher in the tegaserod 12 mg group compared with placebo (RR 2.80, 95% CI 2.13 to 3.68), with a number needed to harm (NNH) of 20. Effects of tegaserod on GI symptoms such as bloating, stool consistency, and straining were not consistent across the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tegaserod appears to improve the overall symptomatology of IBS, and the frequency of bowel movements in those with chronic constipation. The clinical importance of these modest improvements is not clear. There are currently few data on its effect on quality of life. In addition, more information is needed about its efficacy in men. It would also be of interest to know whether treatment with tegaserod leads either directly, or indirectly, to changes in visceral sensitivity or psychopathology, which are also considered important in the pathophysiology of these conditions.

Novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Az irritábilis bél szindróma (IBS) kezelése a változatos tünetek, a társuló neuropszichiátriai kórképek miatt nem könnyű feladat. Bár számos, különböző támadáspontú szert alkalmazunk a betegség kezelésére, a mai napig kevés olyan gyógyszer van, amelynek hatékonyságáról, biztonságosságáról és tolerabilitásáról egyértelmű bizonyítékok állnak rendelkezésre. Az IBS multikauzális jellegéből adódóan a visceralis hiperszenzitivitással, a motilitással, az agy-bél tengely szabályozási zavaraival kapcsolatos kutatások eredményei, a folyamatokban központi szerepet játszó neurotranszmitterek, ezek receptorainak megismerése teremtette meg az új kezelési lehetőségek alapját. Bár napjainkban néhány gyógyszert (alosetron, tegaserod) már törzskönyveztek egyes országokban IBS-ben, az új készítményekkel kapcsolatban még több, nagy betegszámú vizsgálatra van szükség.

Tegaserod in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation as the prime symptom

Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) as the predominant bowel symptom is a prevalent disorder, characterized by recurring abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, and constipation, and imposes a significant socio-economic burden. Traditional treatments generally address just one of the multiple IBS symptoms. The efficacy and safety profile of tegaserod, a serotonin 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, has been demonstrated in several randomized, placebo-controlled, and open-label trials. This review discusses the major clinical trials of tegaserod, which have involved 8948 IBS patients. Overall, data reveal that tegaserod is an effective treatment for IBS-C, providing statistically significant relief of overall and multiple individual IBS-C symptoms (abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, and constipation) in both placebo-controlled and "real-life" open-label settings. Repeat treatments with tegaserod were also shown to be effective, which is noteworthy given the chronic and episodic nature of IBS. Moreover, tegaserod was associated with improvements in patients' quality of life and work productivity. Data also indicate that tegaserod is well tolerated over the short-term (4 weeks), long-term (12 months), and repeated treatments. Diarrhea is the only adverse event consistently associated with tegaserod and was generally mild and transient. Overall, tegaserod has been demonstrated to offer effective and well-tolerated treatment of IBS-C, providing patients with meaningful symptom relief.

The effects of tegaserod on oesophageal function and bolus transport in healthy volunteers: studies using concurrent high-resolution manometry and videofluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Tegaserod is a partial 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist with prokinetic effects on the gastrointestinal tract, its effects on oesophageal function are unknown.

AIM

A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind trial assessed the effect of tegaserod on the oesophagus in healthy, asymptomatic subjects.

METHOD

A 7-day course of tegaserod 6 mg b.d. vs. placebo was prescribed (n = 17/21 completed both phases of study). High-resolution manometry and pH measurements were performed before and after a test meal. Bolus transport of liquids and solids was studied by high-resolution manometry and videofluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Tegaserod had no effect on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure compared with placebo, peristaltic velocity increased (P < 0.001) and distal contractile pressure decreased slightly (P < 0.05). Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux were infrequent regardless of treatment. During the studies of bolus transport, high-resolution manometry revealed that tegaserod promoted mid-oesophageal contractility (P < 0.02) and shortened the 'proximal transition zone' (P < 0.05), the level where bolus escape occurred most frequently. These effects had no effect on liquid bolus transport; however a non-significant trend to improved solid bolus transport was observed (66% vs. 31%;P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Tegaserod did not alter lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, but had significant effects on peristaltic function. High-resolution manometry promoted mid-oesophageal contractility during bolus transport. This effect was associated with a non-significant trend to improved solid bolus transit.

Use of novel prokinetic agents to facilitate return of gastrointestinal motility in adult critically ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intolerance of enteral feeding due to impaired gastrointestinal motility is common in critically ill patients. Strategies to prevent or treat gastrointestinal hypomotility include the use of prokinetic agents. Many currently employed prokinetic agents are associated with serious adverse drug reactions. The novel prokinetic agents - alvimopan, tegaserod, and dexloxiglumide - are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alvimopan exerts mixed, but generally favorable, effects on restoration of gastrointestinal motility in patients with postoperative ileus. The observation of increased opioid requirements (without increased pain scores) and associated clinical ramifications requires further study. Tegaserod stimulates the peristaltic reflex and improves motility in multiple sites along the gastrointestinal tract. Its efficacy in improving gastrointestinal hypomotility in the critically ill population has not yet been determined. Furthermore, its use has been associated with the development of ischemic colitis and increased requirement for abdominal/pelvic surgery. Dexloxiglumide may be beneficial for improving gastric emptying in critically ill patients, especially those receiving lipid-enriched enteral feeds.

SUMMARY

Novel prokinetic agents show promise for management of gastrointestinal hypomotility in the critically ill population. However, further study is required before these agents can be recommended for use.

Systematic review: the safety and tolerability of pharmacological agents for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome--a European perspective

AIM

To use an evidence-based approach to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the treatments available for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), or in clinical development, in Europe. A separate review appraises the evidence for the efficacy of these therapies.

METHODS

A literature search (for 1980 to 2005) was completed for all relevant clinical trial data and other articles which included safety information on the use of pharmacological IBS therapies. Clinical trials were scored according to the level of safety information, and adverse event incidence reported when possible.

RESULTS

The tolerability of many of the agents used to treat IBS in Europe is poorly understood. However, serotonergic agents, such as tegaserod and alosetron, which are currently unavailable in Europe, have undergone rigorous assessment in IBS and their benefits have been established. Following initial marketing of alosetron for use in patients with IBS with diarrhoea, concerns about severe constipation and ischaemic colitis resulted in restriction of its use to women with severe IBS symptoms. This highlights the importance of post-marketing surveillance and post-marketing studies in refining the therapeutic indication of new IBS therapies, which will help to identify appropriate recipients for the drug and establish the impact of adverse reactions in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant lack of data on the safety and tolerability of the therapies currently used routinely to treat IBS in Europe. The newer agents have undergone rigorous assessment, such that their benefits and risks in treating IBS are established. Defining their place among the spectrum of available therapies remains challenging when the benefits and risks of the older treatments are so poorly characterized.

Safety and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with chronic constipation: pooled data from two phase III studies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies show that tegaserod effectively relieves the symptoms of chronic constipation/idiopathic constipation (CC). This pooled analysis assessed the safety and tolerability of tegaserod in a large dataset of CC patients.

METHODS

Adverse event (AE) data were pooled from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials of 12 weeks' duration. Post hoc analysis was conducted for the most frequent AEs (incidence, >or=3%).

RESULTS

Eight hundred eighty-one, 861, and 861 patients received tegaserod 6 mg twice a day, 2 mg twice a day, or placebo, respectively. Most AEs were mild/moderately severe. AE incidence was similar for the tegaserod 6 mg and 2 mg twice a day (57.1% and 56.3%, respectively) and placebo groups (59.6%) and most frequent in the gastrointestinal system (tegaserod 6 mg twice a day, 25.8%; 2 mg twice a day, 22.5%; placebo, 24.6%). Headache, the most common AE, was slightly more frequent in the placebo group (tegaserod 6 mg twice a day, 11.0%; 2 mg twice a day, 10.1%; placebo, 13.2%). Diarrhea (generally transient and resolved with continued treatment) was the only AE with a statistically significant difference between groups (tegaserod 6 mg twice a day 6.6% vs placebo 3.0%, P=.0005). Serious AE incidence (1.4% overall) was comparable across treatment groups, although abdominal surgery was less common in the combined tegaserod (0.5%) than the placebo group (1.0%). Discontinuation as a result of AEs was slightly higher in tegaserod 6 mg twice a day patients (5.7%; 2 mg twice a day, 3.3%; placebo, 3.7%), mainly because of diarrhea. Laboratory and electrocardiogram parameters were comparable across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegaserod is well tolerated by patients with CC during 12 weeks of treatment.

Treatment of gastroparesis: a multidisciplinary clinical review

This clinical review on the treatment of patients with gastroparesis is a consensus document developed by the American Motility Society Task Force on Gastroparesis. It is a multidisciplinary effort with input from gastroenterologists and other specialists who are involved in the care of patients with gastroparesis. To provide practical guidelines for treatment, this document covers results of published research studies in the literature and areas developed by consensus agreement where clinical research trials remain lacking in the field of gastroparesis.

The rationale, efficacy and safety evidence for tegaserod in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

A growing body of evidence implicates abnormal serotonergic regulation of gastrointestinal function in the pathogenesis of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Drugs targeting this system are therefore attractive concepts. The partial 5-HT4 receptor agonist tegaserod might be predicted to have positive therapeutic effects on a constipated and uncomfortable gut. However, IBS runs a chronic, benign course and carries no associated mortality, so it is imperative that the safety profile of new pharmacological agents made available to physicians is exemplary. The authors review the evidence for 5-HT in the aetiology of IBS and its symptoms, and the data available concerning the partial 5-HT4 receptor agonist tegaserod, in terms of rationale, efficacy and safety.

Use of tegaserod along with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-EL) used for colonoscopy preparation is not well tolerated by several patients. A significant number of patients have inadequate bowel preparation despite taking PEG-EL.

AIMS

To determine the effect of prokinetic agent, tegaserod when given in addition to PEG-EL on patient tolerance, quality of colonic preparation and adverse side effects experienced.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, a total of 130 patients scheduled for colonoscopy were enrolled. They were instructed to take three pills of either tegaserod 6 mg each or placebo (one pill twice on the day prior to and third pill in the morning on the day of colonoscopy) in addition to standard 4L of PEG-EL in the evening prior to the day of colonoscopy. Patient tolerance of preparation, quality of bowel preparation, overall satisfaction and adverse side effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients in placebo group and 58 patients in tegaserod group completed the study. There was no difference between the two groups in the tolerance of preparation, quality of bowel preparation, overall satisfaction and the side effects.

CONCLUSION

Addition of tegaserod to polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution during colonoscopy preparation does not improve patient tolerance, quality of colonic preparation or the adverse side effects.

Tegaserod in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation

Tegaserod, a novel serotonin receptor agonist, has gained acceptance and widespread use for the treatment of women with irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. Development of this therapy evolved from the emerging role of serotonin in gastrointestinal motor, secretory and sensory functions. The efficacy and safety of tegaserod has been well established in women suffering from irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving more than 3500 predominantly female patients with irritable bowel syndrome and constipation have demonstrated the superiority of tegaserod over placebo in improving global and individual symptoms. The most common side effects of tegaserod in clinical trials were diarrhea and headache. Recent data suggest that retreatment with tegaserod after a drug holiday is efficacious, opening the door to the possibility of intermittent therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. Areas in need of further investigation include the role of tegaserod in the treatment of pain and bloating in irritable bowel syndrome, whether tegaserod has a role in male patients, the long-term efficacy of tegaserod, whether tolerance develops in a subset of patients with extended therapy and whether tegaserod is beneficial for the treatment of other functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Recognizing and managing patients with irritable bowel syndrome

PURPOSE

To address the diagnosis and clinical management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and provide a discussion of the available serotonergic agents.

DATA SOURCES

Recent studies examining the pathophysiology of IBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic testing may be required in the subset of patients with IBS who present with alarm symptoms, or "red flags," suggestive of underlying organic disease. An important role has been suggested for the neurotransmitter serotonin in both gut motility and visceral pain sensitivity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A diagnosis of IBS is largely based on symptoms; therefore, effective clinician-patient communication and careful attention to details of patient presentation, history, and physical examination are essential.

Tegaserod (HTF 919) stimulates gut motility in normal horses

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY

It has been shown that the selective 5-HT4 receptor agonist tegaserod induces an increase in frequency and amplitude of contractions in isolated muscle preparations of equine ileum and pelvic flexure.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of tegaserod on gut motility and transit of spheres in normal horses.

METHODS

Six mature Freiberger horses were kept under standardised conditions. Effects of tegaserod (0.02 mg/kg bwt i.v. b.i.d. for 2 days) or vehicle on intestinal transit of barium-filled spheres, defaecation and gut sounds were studied in a cross-over design. Spheres were given via stomach tube prior to the first dosing of tegaserod or vehicle. Faeces were collected every 3 h and spheres eliminated were identified radiologically in the faeces.

RESULTS

Tegaserod significantly accelerated the gastrointestinal (GI) transit time of spheres and increased the frequency of defaecation and scores of gut sounds compared to vehicle. The compound was well tolerated; no effects on behaviour, body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and clinical laboratory data were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegaserod efficaciously stimulated motility and accelerate GI transit in healthy horses.

POTENTIAL RELEVANCE

Tegaserod may offer therapeutic potential in horses suffering from impaction or paralytic ileus.

Rationale for using serotonergic agents to treat irritable bowel syndrome

PURPOSE

The role of serotonin in gastrointestinal (GI)-tract functioning, the pharmacologic rationale for using serotonergic agents in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and clinical experience with novel serotonergic agents are described.

SUMMARY

IBS is a common multisymptom disorder that is associated with a high socioeconomic burden. The goal of treatment is to provide rapid and sustained global relief of the multiple symptoms of IBS with a single, effective, well-tolerated agent. Traditional treatment options target single symptoms, and many patients are dissatisfied with the level of relief achieved and adverse effects. Research has revealed that serotonin is involved in three major actions in the gut: (1) mediating intestinal motility, (2) mediating intestinal secretion in the GI tract, and (3) modulating perception in the bowels. Serotonin is also a vital link in the brain-gut axis. Alterations in key elements of serotonin signaling have been demonstrated in patients with IBS. Tegaserod, a selective serotonin type 4 (5-HT(4))-receptor partial agonist, is indicated for use in women with IBS whose primary bowel symptom is constipation. Alosetron, a 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist, is indicated for use in women with severe diarrhea-predominant IBS in whom traditional therapies have failed. The clinical usefulness of several other serotonergic agents for IBS is being investigated.

CONCLUSION

The use of serotonergic agents in patients with IBS is based on the critical role that serotonin plays in the maintenance of normal gut function and brain-gut communication. Pharmacologic therapies targeting specific serotonin receptors represent an important step in the management of IBS.

Current pharmacological treatment of gastroparesis

The aetiology of gastroparesis differs between children and adults. During childhood, gastroparesis is quite rare, and is mostly seen in preterm infants, with either immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, or when allergic to cow's milk protein. Acute, delayed gastric emptying may be observed following viral infections. In adults, most patients with gastroparesis are either idiopathic or of diabetic origin. As a consequence, approaches in the treatment of children and adults differ. Metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride and erythromycin have all been studied. Evidence for benefit is strongest for the latter two drugs, although most studies have methodological shortcomings. From a paediatric perspective, it seems astonishing that more trials with erythromycin analogues have not been performed, as the few data available suggests that these analogues are more powerful, without the side effects of long-term, low-dose administration of antibiotics. Gastric electrical stimulation seems the most promising therapeutic option available at present.

Review of tegaserod in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Tegaserod is a drug in a new class of compounds called aminoguanidine indoles and is structurally similar to serotonin (5-HT) with modifications that make the drug selective for the 5-HT(4) receptor. Tegaserod has a stimulatory effect on gastrointestinal (GI) motility that has been demonstrated in animal studies and in healthy adults. Tegaserod also increases GI secretion and reduces rectal sensitivity. Tegaserod is currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of women with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (C-IBS). Eight large Phase III clinical trials involving > 5000 IBS patients support the clinical efficacy of tegaserod in this group of patients. Patients who were treated with tegaserod had an overall improvement in IBS symptoms (Subject's Assessment of Global Relief) as well as in secondary end points, such as abdominal pain and discomfort, stool consistency, change in bowel movements and relief of bloating. Tegaserod was well-tolerated. The most common adverse reaction in clinical trials was diarrhoea, which was usually temporary and mild, although severe diarrhoea requiring hospitalisation has been rarely (< 1%) reported.

Options for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: contrasting traditional and novel serotonergic therapies

This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of traditional therapies for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and concludes that they are limited by both poor efficacy and adverse effects. Serotonin, a neurotransmitter found mainly in the gut, appears to represent a link in IBS pathophysiological processes -- altered gut motility, abnormal intestinal secretion and visceral hypersensitivity. Recently, available treatments for IBS have targeted serotonin receptors that are involved in motor, sensory and secretory functions of the gut. Serotonergic agents, such as alosetron (a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist) and tegaserod (a selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist), provide global relief of the multiple symptoms of IBS with diarrhoea and IBS with constipation, respectively, and represent important additions to the IBS treatment armamentarium.

Meta-analysis: The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

To evaluate therapies available for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, and provide consensus recommendations for their use, a total of 51 double-blind clinical trials using bulking agents, prokinetics, antispasmodics, alosetron, tegaserod and antidepressants were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using 5-point scale. Meta-analyses were performed on all studies, and on 'high-quality studies'. The efficacy of fibre in the global irritable bowel syndrome symptoms relief (OR: 1.9; 95% CI:1.5-2.4) was lost after exclusion of low-quality trials (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0, P = 0.06). When excluding the low-quality trials, an improvement of global irritable bowel syndrome symptoms with all antispasmodics (OR: 2.1; 95% CI:1.8-2.9) was maintained only for octylonium bromide, but on the basis of only two studies. Antidepressants were effective (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.9-3.5), even after exclusion of low-quality studies (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7). Alosetron (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.9-2.6) and tegaserod (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.5) showed a significant effect in women. We recommend the use of tegaserod for women with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and alosetron for women with severe irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Antidepressants can be beneficial for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea patients with severe symptoms. Loperamide can be recommended in painless diarrhoea. Evidence is weak to recommend the use of bulking agents in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

Review article: the safety profile of tegaserod

Gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common side-effects of tegaserod therapy. In data pooled from Phase III randomized controlled trials in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhoea was reported by 8.8% of patients treated with tegaserod 6 mg b.d. vs. 3.8% of patients treated with placebo. Similar rates were observed in international post-US marketing randomized controlled trials. In most patients, tegaserod-induced diarrhoea was mild and transient. In randomized controlled trials, it did not elicit fluid or electrolyte disturbances, and fewer than 3% of irritable bowel syndrome patients discontinued tegaserod due to diarrhoea. The incidence of other gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, nausea and flatulence) was similar in tegaserod-treated and placebo-treated patients. Pooled analysis of Phase III and post-US marketing randomized controlled trials did not demonstrate significant differences between tegaserod-treated and placebo-treated patients in the incidence of abdominal/pelvic surgery. No episodes of ischaemic colitis were reported in tegaserod-using patients in any Phase III or post-marketing randomized controlled trials, and post-marketing surveillance indicated that the rate of ischaemic colitis in tegaserod-using patients was lower than that in non-tegaserod-using patients. Pooled analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials demonstrated an increase in the incidence of headaches in tegaserod-treated (6 mg b.d.) vs. placebo-treated patients (15% vs. 12.3%, respectively; P < 0.05), although post-US marketing randomized controlled trials did not demonstrate this increase. Other extra-gastrointestinal adverse events occurred with similar frequency in tegaserod-treated and placebo-treated patients. Tegaserod-treated patients in randomized controlled trials did not demonstrate significant prolongation of the QTc interval or cardiac arrhythmias compared with placebo-treated patients. In summary, tegaserod exhibits a favourable safety and tolerability profile in irritable bowel syndrome patients based on data from clinical trials.

Safety and tolerability of tegaserod in irritable bowel syndrome management

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the need for safe and effective therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and to provide up-to-date information on the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod, a novel treatment for women with IBS whose primary bowel symptom is constipation.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and abstracts from gastroenterology conferences were searched through October 2003 using the following search terms: irritable bowel syndrome, IBS, tegaserod, cisapride, alosetron, systematic review, safety, tolerability, serotonin, 5-HT, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and 5-HT4 receptor agonist; all information on the safety and tolerability of tegaserod published up to October 2003 is included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A comprehensive review of the medical literature (through 2001) finds no adequate therapies that address the multiple symptoms of IBS. Traditional agents, although occasionally effective, often cause adverse effects. Tegaserod, a selective serotonin type 4 receptor (5-HT4) partial agonist, overcomes a number of obstacles associated with traditional therapies. Important information for pharmacists about the safety and tolerability of tegaserod is presented.

CONCLUSION

Tegaserod is effective in treating multiple IBS symptoms in women with IBS whose primary bowel symptom is constipation, and it is safe and well tolerated.

Safety Profile of Tegaserod, a 5-HT4 Receptor Agonist, for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

This article reviews the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod, a novel selective partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT(4) receptor. Tegaserod was recently approved for the treatment of women with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation. Tegaserod exhibits rapid absorption from the small intestine, and is excreted unchanged in the faeces and as metabolites in the urine. Meal ingestion decreases its bioavailability. There is little effect of age or gender on pharmacokinetics, although plasma levels may be slightly higher in the elderly. Tegaserod has no effect on plasma levels of other drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzyme systems. Gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common adverse effects of tegaserod therapy. In data pooled from phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in IBS with constipation patients, diarrhoea was reported by 8.8% of patients treated with tegaserod 6mg twice daily versus 3.8% of patients receiving placebo. Similar rates have been observed in international post-US marketing RCTs. In most patients, tegaserod-induced diarrhoea was mild and transient. In RCTs, it did not elicit fluid or electrolyte disturbances, and fewer than 3% of IBS patients discontinued tegaserod due to diarrhoea. Since its release, rare cases of more severe diarrhoea and ischaemic colitis have been reported. The incidence of other gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, nausea, and flatulence) has been similar among tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients. Pooled analysis of phase III RCTs and post-US marketing RCTs have not demonstrated significant differences between tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients in the incidence of abdominal-pelvic surgery. There is no convincing evidence that rebound gastrointestinal symptoms occur upon termination of tegaserod therapy. Pooled analysis of phase III RCTs demonstrated an increase in the incidence of headaches among tegaserod-treated patients (6mg twice daily) compared with placebo-treated patients (15% vs 12.3%, respectively, p < 0.05), although post-US marketing RCTs have not observed this increase. Other extra-gastrointestinal adverse events occur with similar frequency among tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients. Tegaserod-treated patients in RCTs have not demonstrated significant prolongation of the QTc interval or cardiac arrhythmias compared with placebo-treated patients. Supra-therapeutic doses in healthy volunteers did not effect electrocardiographic parameters. Laboratory parameters are mostly unaffected by tegaserod, although several individuals have exhibited increased eosinophil counts. In summary, tegaserod exhibits a favourable safety and tolerability profile in IBS patients based on data from clinical trials. Diarrhoea is the most common adverse event associated with tegaserod use. Continued post-US marketing surveillance will further define the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Tegaserod in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Tegaserod is a new partial agonist of serotonin 5-HT4 receptors specifically developed for the treatment of nondiarrhoeal forms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Among its various effects is the stimulation of the peristaltic reflex with its promotility action appearing to affect the whole length of the gastrointestinal tract. Tegaserod has been assessed in a number of international multicentre trials and its use leads to an improvement in abdominal pain and bowel dysfunction as well as global well-being, at the expense of remarkably few adverse effects. It is noteworthy that it also appears to improve bloating, a benefit that has not been previously reported for a medication used in IBS. The optimal dose is 6 mg twice daily and the advantage of tegaserod over placebo in different trials varies from 5-20% with the number needed to treat ranging from 5-15 depending on the time at which this effect is calculated during the course of a trial. Recent experience with other drugs acting on 5-HT receptors has focused attention on possible safety issues such as prolongation of the QTc interval on the electrocardiogram and ischaemic colitis. However, data from efficacy trials and studies specifically designed to address the safety of tegaserod have not revealed any evidence of cardiotoxicity or the potential for causing ischaemic colitis. Furthermore, investigation of possible interactions with other drugs such as warfarin or the oral contraceptive have not resulted in any prescribing restrictions. Inappropriate prescription of tegaserod to a subgroup of IBS patients for which the drug was not designed, does not appear to have any serious consequences. Most of the efficacy data on tegaserod has been accumulated in females, simply as a result of the failure to recruit adequate numbers of males or restriction of trials to females. There is therefore insufficient information to assess whether there might be any potential gender differences in responsiveness. For this reason, the drug is currently only licensed for use in females.

Tegaserod for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

IBS is a complex disorder that encompasses a wide profile of symptoms. Current drug treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are of limited value. Many target specific symptoms only. Tegaserod, a 5HT(4) partial agonist, represents a novel mechanism of action in the treatment of IBS.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tegaserod for the treatment of IBS in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and above.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE 1966-November 2002 and EMBASE 1980-November 2002 were searched. The text and key words used included "tegaserod", "HTF 919", "irritable bowel", and "colonic diseases, functional". The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Review Group Specialized Trials Register, and Science Citation Index were also searched. Proceedings from the British Society of Gastroenterology Annual Meeting, and Digestive Disease Week (1998-2002) were hand searched. The manufacturer of tegaserod was contacted. Relevant articles were retrieved, and their reference lists were also reviewed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing tegaserod with placebo, no treatment or any other intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmacological) in subjects aged 12 years and above with a diagnosis of IBS, focusing on clinical endpoints were considered for review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study inclusion and exclusion, data extraction and quality assessment was undertaken by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was performed where study populations, designs, outcomes, and statistical reporting allowed combination of data in a valid way, using the summary statistic relative risk with 95% CI. Eight short-term placebo-controlled studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. These were predominantly conducted in women. Seven studies evaluated the efficacy of tegaserod on global gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients with constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS). One small study evaluated safety in patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS.

MAIN RESULTS

The relative risk (RR) of being a responder in terms of global relief of GI symptoms was significantly higher with tegaserod 12 mg (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09, 1.29) and tegaserod 4 mg (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02, 1.31) compared with placebo, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 14 and 20 respectively. When all tegaserod doses were combined and compared with placebo (n=4040), the RR of being a responder was 1.17 (95% CI 1.08, 1.27), with a NNT of 17. Although the pooled results indicate statistically significant benefit with tegaserod, the a priori minimal clinically important differences set in two of the four pooled studies were not reached. Tegaserod did not significantly improve the patients' individual symptoms of abdominal pain and discomfort although bowel habit showed a statistically significant improvement with tegaserod 4 mg and there was a non-significant trend in favour of tegaserod 12 mg. When GI symptoms were assessed separately, those indicative of GI motility such as number of bowel movements and days without bowel movements were generally improved with tegaserod although the proportion of patients experiencing diarrhoea was significantly higher in the tegaserod 12 mg group compared with placebo (RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.90, 3.97), with a number needed to harm (NNH) of 20. Effects of tegaserod on GI symptoms such as bloating, stool consistency, and straining were not consistent across the studies.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Tegaserod appears to improve the overall symptomatology of IBS but there are currently few data on its effect on quality of life. In addition, more information is needed about its efficacy in men. It would also be of interest to know whether treatment with tegaserod leads either directly, or indirectly, to changes in visceral sensitivity or psychopathology, which are also considered important in the pathophysiology of this condition.

Advances in the management of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a commonly encountered condition seen in multiple medical specialties. Recent research has brought dramatic advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, burden of illness, diagnosis, and management of IBS. It is now widely accepted that the prevalence of IBS is between 10% and 20% of the US population and that the direct and indirect costs associated with IBS are significant. The processes required for diagnosis of IBS remain controversial. Scant evidence exists to support exhaustive diagnostic evaluations, and IBS is no longer considered a diagnosis of exclusion. The use of standardized symptom-based criteria remains to be perfected, and the diagnosis is often arrived at only after multiple laboratory, endoscopic, and radiologic examinations. The effects of treatment for IBS mirror the heterogeneous nature of the condition. No single medication has proven to be universally effective, and multiple therapeutic approaches exist. Greater understanding of gastrointestinal neurophysiology has led to promising advances in medical and nonmedical approaches to IBS.

Tegaserod: a review of its use in the management of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in women

The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) has historically been based on the severity of symptoms, with education, reassurance, dietary advice, bulking agents and laxative therapy offered as appropriate. Tegaserod (Zelnorm, Zelmac) is the first selective serotonin 5-HT(4) receptor partial agonist to be approved for the treatment of this syndrome. Tegaserod is active against multiple irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms; it stimulates gut motility and reduces visceral sensitivity and pain. The drug does not cure IBS and was not designed to treat the diarrhoea-predominant version. Its efficacy in men has not been established. Three large well designed clinical trials of tegaserod 6 mg twice daily for 12 weeks in patients (mainly women) with IBS-C have demonstrated superiority versus placebo in global relief from symptoms. Global relief response rates were 38.4-46.8% with tegaserod 6 mg twice daily and 28.3-38.8% with placebo (p < 0.05-0.0001 vs placebo). The relative increases in response rates with tegaserod 6 mg twice daily over the already high responses in the placebo groups ranged from 12-65% after 4-12 weeks of treatment. A response was seen within the first week. The proportion of patients with satisfactory relief from symptoms fell over the 4-week period following withdrawal of tegaserod and placebo, but did not reach baseline levels during this time. Diarrhoea has been associated with tegaserod in clinical trials (an incidence of about 10% versus 5% with placebo, usually occurring in the first week of treatment), but the drug is otherwise well tolerated. There were no apparent changes in the tolerability profile with extended tegaserod treatment (</=12 months). In conclusion, oral tegaserod 6 mg twice daily for 12 weeks is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of IBS-C in women. Data on long term and comparative efficacy, cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life effects would be beneficial; however, in light of the fact that very few alternatives for the treatment of IBS-C have proven efficacy, tegaserod appears to be a promising option in women not responding to increased dietary fibre or osmotic laxative therapy.

Tegaserod maleate in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review

BACKGROUND

Approved in July 2002, tegaserod maleate is a partial 5-hydroxytryptamine 4-receptor agonist used to improve symptoms of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The physiologic actions of tegaserod relate to its ability to stimulate gastric and intestinal motility.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews available data on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy of tegaserod.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE and PubMed from 1966 to the present were conducted using the search terms tegaserod, tegaserod maleate, irritable bowel syndrome, and Rome criteria. Abstracts presented at national meetings between 1997 and 2002 were reviewed and included if perceived to be reliable and relevant.

RESULTS

In clinical trials, tegaserod was associated with significantly better scores on the subject's global assessment of relief compared with placebo (P < 0.05). The absolute efficacy of tegaserod compared with placebo varied between trials and averaged 10% to 12%. Tegaserod had a good safety profile; diarrhea was the only adverse effect that occurred more often in tegaserod recipients than in placebo recipients. No electrocardiographic changes were observed at therapeutic concentrations of tegaserod. Long-term (1-year) treatment with tegaserod appeared to be well tolerated. The recommended dosage for patients aged >18 years with constipation-predominant IBS is 6 mg PO BID before meals for 4 to 6 weeks, with an additional 4 to 6 weeks of treatment if initial therapy is partially effective.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of tegaserod to the arsenal of moderately effective medication currently used in the treatment of IBS may be helpful in patients with constipation-predominant IBS. Continuous postmarketing surveillance and reporting of adverse reactions are essential to further characterize the safety profile of this new agent.