Candidacy for intestinal transplantation

Pre-emptive Intestinal Transplant: The Surgeon's Point of View

Pre-emptive transplantation is a well-established practice for certain types of end-organ failure such as in the use of kidney transplantation. For irreversible intestinal failure, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) remains the gold standard, due to the suboptimal long-term results of intestinal transplantation. As such, the only role for pre-emptive transplantation, if at all, will be for patients identified to be at high risk of complications and mortality while on definitive long-term TPN. In these patients, the timing of early listing and transplantation could become life-saving, taking into account that mortality on the waiting list is still the highest for intestinal candidates. The development of simulation models or pre-transplant scoring systems could help in selecting patients based on potential outcome on TPN or with transplantation, and recent reports from high-volume centers identify few underlying pathologic conditions and some TPN complications as at higher risk of increased morbidity and mortality. A pre-emptive transplant could be used as a rehabilitative procedure in a well-selected case-by-case scenario, among TPN patients at risk of liver failure, repeated central line infections, mesenteric infarction, short bowel syndrome (SBS) <50 cm or with end stoma, congenital mucosal disease, desmoid tumors: These conditions must be carefully evaluated, not to underestimate the clinical stage nor to over-estimate the impact of a temporary situation. At the present time, diseases with a variable and unpredictable course, such as intestinal dysmotility disorders, or quality of life and financial issues are still far from being considered as indications for a pre-emptive transplant.

Small bowel in vivo bioengineering using an aortic matrix in a porcine model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of an in vivo small bowel bioengineering model using allogeneic aortic grafts in pigs.

BACKGROUND

The best treatment for short bowel syndrome is still unclear. Intestinal transplantation, as well as lifelong parenteral nutrition is associated with a 5-year survival rate of less than 50 %. We have already used allogeneic arterial segments to replace the upper airway in sheep. The results were encouraging with an induced transformation of the aortic wall into tracheo-bronchial bronchial-type tissue.

METHODS

Seven young mini-pigs were used. A 10-cm-diameter, allogeneic, aortic graft was interposed in an excluded small bowel segment and wrapped by the neighboring omentum. Animals were autopsied at 1 (n = 2), 3 (n = 3), and 6 months (n = 2), respectively. Specimens were examined macroscopically and microscopically.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate of the animals was 71.4 %. No anastomotic leak occurred. Histologic analysis revealed intestinal-like wall transformation of the aortic graft in the surviving animals.

CONCLUSION

Aortic-enteric anastomosis is feasible in a porcine model. Moreover, in vivo, bioengineered, intestinal-like transformation of the vascular wall was identified.

Isolated small bowel transplantation outcomes and the impact of immunosuppressants: Experience of a single transplant center

AIM: To investigate patient and graft outcomes in isolated small bowel transplant (SBTx) recipients and immunosuppressant induction agent impact on outcomes.

METHODS: A retrospective review of the perioperative data of patients who underwent SBTx transplant during an 8-year period was conducted. The intraoperative data were: patient demographics, etiology of short gut syndrome, hemodynamic parameters, coagulation profiles, intraoperative fluid and blood products transfused, and development of post-reperfusion. The postoperative data were: hospital/intensive care unit stays, duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative incidence of acute kidney injury, and 1-year patient and graft outcomes. The effects of the three immunosuppressant induction agents (Zenapax, Thymoglobulin, Campath) on patient and graft outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS: During the 8-year period there were 77 patients; 1-year patient and graft survival were 95% and 86% respectively. Sixteen patients received Zenapax, 22 received Thymoglobulin, and 39 received Campath without effects on patient or graft survival (P = 0.90, P =

0.14, respectively). The use of different immune induction agents did not affect the incidence of rejection and infection during the first 90 postoperative days (P = 0.072, P = 0.29, respectively). The Zenapax group received more intraoperative fluid and blood products and were coagulopathic at the end of surgery. Zenapax and Thymoglobulin significantly increased serum creatinine at 48 h (P = 0.023) and 1 wk (P = 0.001) post-transplant, but none developed renal failure or required dialysis at the end of the first year.

CONCLUSION: One-year patient and graft survival were 95% and 86%, respectively. The use of different immunosuppressant induction agents may affect the intraoperative course and short-term postoperative morbidities, but not 1-year patient and graft outcomes.

Study of teduglutide effectiveness in parenteral nutrition-dependent short-bowel syndrome subjects

Loss of intestinal absorptive capacity from congenital defect, surgical resection or mucosal disease results in short bowel syndrome (SBS)-associated intestinal failure. In the past, few medical management options were available besides dietary modification, controlling diarrhea or high stomal output, and providing parenteral fluid, electrolyte and nutrient support (parenteral support). Recent research on strategies to enhance the intestinal absorptive capacity focused on glucagon-like peptide-2, an intestinotrophic hormone that has been shown to increase the villus height and crypt depth, and decrease gastric motility and intestinal secretory losses. STEPS is a Phase III randomized double-blinded controlled trial in which teduglutide, a recombinant analog of glucagon-like peptide-2, or placebo was given subcutaneously to SBS patients for 24 weeks. A clinically meaningful response, defined as a 20-100% reduction in parenteral support volume, was achieved in 63% of the treatment group compared with 30% in the placebo group (p = 0.002) without an increase in serious side effects. Teduglutide offers a new targeted approach to SBS-associated intestinal failure management. Its specific role in clinical practice remains to be evaluated.

Where are we at with short bowel syndrome and small bowel transplant

Intestinal failure can be defined as the critical reduction of functional gut mass below the minimal amount necessary for adequate digestion and absorption to satisfy body nutrient and fluid requirements in adults or children. Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is characterized by a state of malabsorption following extensive resection of the small bowel. SBS may occur after resection of more than 50% and is certain after resection of more than 70% of the small intestine, or if less than 100 cm of small bowel is left. Several treatment modalities other than total parenteral nutrition, including hormones (recombinant human growth hormone, glucagon-like peptide-2) and tailoring surgeries (Bianchi procedure, serial transverse enteroplasty), had been proposed, however these were either experimental or inefficient. Small bowel transplant is a rather new approach for SBS. The once feared field of solid organ transplantation is nowadays becoming more and more popular, even in developing countries. This is partially secondary to the developments in immunosuppressive strategy. In this regard, alemtuzumab deserves special attention. There are more complex surgeries, such as multivisceral transplantation, for multi-organ involvement including small bowel. This latter technique is relatively new when compared to small bowel transplant, and is performed in certain centers worldwide. In this review, an attempt is made to give an insight into small bowel syndrome, small bowel transplantation, and related issues.

Teduglutide for the treatment of short bowel syndrome

Extensive resection of the intestine impairs its absorptive capacity and results in short bowel syndrome when the nutritional equilibrium is compromised. The remnant intestine adapts structurally to compensate, but nutritional autonomy cannot be achieved in patients with intestinal failure, requiring intravenous fluids and parenteral nutrition (PN) for sustenance of life. PN is expensive and associated with serious complications. Efforts to minimize or eliminate the need for PN heralded research focusing on the therapeutic utility of intrinsic gut factors involved in the postresection adaptation process. With the breakthrough recognition of the intestinotrophic properties of glucagon-like peptide-2, teduglutide, a recombinant analogue of glucagon-like peptide-2, is being investigated as a promising hope to mitigate the requirement of PN. Clinical studies to date have demonstrated a desirable benefit-to-risk profile in regards to its safety and efficacy. If approved for marketing, it will be the first of its class in short bowel syndrome management, offering an innovative therapeutic modality for this debilitating condition.

Nutrition and quality of life following small intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The outcome from small bowel transplantation (SBTx) has improved progressively over the past decade raising questions as to whether indications should be broadened from those currently followed based on "TPN (total parenteral nutrition) failure."

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

To assess current outcome, we studied the effect of transplantation on nutritional autonomy, organ function, and quality of life (QoL) measured by a validated self-administered questionnaire containing 26 domains and 130 questions, for a minimum of 12 months in a cohort of 46 consecutively transplanted patients between June 2003 and July 2004. The majority of transplanted patients (76%) had intestinal failure because of extreme short bowel, the remainder having either chronic pseudo-obstruction or porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT). All but the PMVT patients were dependent on home TPN (HPN) (median 2, range 0-25 yr) and had developed serious recurrent infective complications with (25%) or without central vein thrombosis and liver failure. Sixty-one percent received a liver in addition to a small intestine.

RESULTS

Follow-up was for a mean of 21 (range 12-36) months. Five patients died, two with chronic graft rejection. All the remaining patients have graft survival with an average of 1.2 (range 0-5) episodes of acute rejection. All patients were weaned from TPN by a median of 18 days (range 1-117 days) and from tube feeding by day 69 (range 22-272 days). There was a significant improvement in overall assessment of QoL and in 13 of 26 of the specific domains examined.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the claim that a new era has dawned for SBTx, such that, with continued progress, it can potentially become an alternative to HPN for the management of permanent intestinal failure, rather than a last-chance treatment for "TPN failure."

Small bowel transplantation

Until very recently, outcomes from small bowel transplantation (SBTx) lagged behind those in liver, heart, and kidney transplantation because of the magnitude of the immunologic burden; the strong expression of histocompatibility antigens; and the contamination in grafts by bacterial organisms. With novel techniques of immune-induction therapies, such as recipient "preconditioning" with lymphocyte reduction, followed by the more subtle use of immunosuppression-based single-agent tacrolimus, graft and host 1-year survival is now over 90% in the most active US centers, a finding that parallels the outcomes in liver and kidney transplantation. In contrast to the alternative therapy for permanent intestinal failure, home total parenteral nutrition (TPN), SBTx improves quality of life and restores digestive and absorptive function, making patients nutritionally autonomous. With survival beyond 1 to 3 years, the procedure is cost-effective. Current results support expansion of the indications for SBTx from use as salvage therapy for patients with TPN failure to preemptive therapy for patients at risk of developing TPN failure.