A pilot study of extended duration peginterferon alfa-2a for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

Peginterferon and Entecavir Combination Therapy Improves Outcome of Non-Early Response Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Patients

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of nucleot(s)ide analogs (NAs) and pegylated interferon (PegIFN) combination therapy for hepatitis B e antigen-positive (HBeAg+) patients is still controversial. Whether PegIFN and entecavir (ETV) combination therapy could provide a greater benefit for HBeAg+ patients was assessed.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve HBeAg+ patients initiated on PegIFN alfa-2a (PegIFNα-2a) for 24 weeks without early response (early response: HBsAg <1500 IU/mL and hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA <105 copies/mL) were recruited in the current study. Among total of 94 patients, 51 were continued on PegIFNα-2a monotherapy, and 43 were offered PegIFNα-2a and ETV combined therapy.

RESULTS

Better outcomes in response to the combined therapy, compared with that of the monotherapy, were demonstrated, including more HBsAg decline and loss and HBV DNA decline and HBeAg clearance. Importantly, the patients with HBsAg levels between 1500 and 20 000 IU/mL initially or between 5000 and 20 000 IU/mL after 24 weeks of PegIFNα-2a benefitted more from the combined therapy, compared with those on monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy of PegIFNα-2a and ETV is more efficacious for HBeAg+ patients without early response to PegIFN monotherapy, and HBsAg levels are a good predictor of treatment outcomes.

HBsAg quantification predicts off-treatment response to interferon in chronic hepatitis B patients: a retrospective study of 250 cases

BACKGROUND

For chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without willingness to extend the routine duration of interferon (IFN) therapy, it is important to identify patients who will benefit from treatment cessation. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification is recommended for management of IFN therapy. At present, the understanding on end-of-treatment (EOT) HBsAg level predicting post-treatment response to IFN is still finite.

METHODS

A total of 2451 non-cirrhosis, HBsAg-postive patients treated with IFN-based therapy during the period from December 2010 to December 2017 at Nanfang Hospital were enrolled in this study. Serum HBsAg levels at EOT were measured to evaluate the associations between EOT HBsAg levels (Group 1, HBsAg > 0.05 and ≤ 10 IU/mL; Group 2, HBsAg > 10 and ≤ 200 IU/mL; Group 3, HBsAg > 200 IU/mL) with post-treatment HBsAg loss. Chi-squared, t-test,,Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression analysis, and Multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyse and evaluate differences between the there groups.

RESULTS

The cumulative HBsAg loss rates 5 years after treatment in Group 1-3 were 30.4% (17/56), 9.8%(4/41) and 0%(0/153) (p < 0.001). An EOT HBsAg level of > 10 IU/mL showed relatively high negative predictive value (NPV) of up to 97.9% for HBsAg loss. Low baseline HBsAg level < 25,000 IU/mL, on-treatment HBsAg decline > 1 log10IU/mL at week 24 and EOT HBsAg level ≤ 10 IU/mL were found significantly associated with HBsAg loss. A total of 6 patients have achieved HBsAg loss at EOT and 17 patients with EOT HBsAg level ≤ 10 IU/mL have achieved post-treatment HBsAg loss. Baseline characteristics, dynamic changes of on-treatment HBsAg and duration of IFN therapy were balanced across patients with EOT or post-treatment HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSION

EOT HBsAg level can serve as a monitoring indicator for IFN therapy. EOT HBsAg level ≤ 10 IU/mL was found to lead to high rate of post-treatment HBsAg loss. For patients without willingness to extend IFN treatment, off-treatment follow-up could be considered when HBsAg level decreased to ≤10 IU/mL.

Effects of pegylated interferon-α based therapies on functional cure and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to pose a serious global health threat and a significant socio-economic burden in many areas of the world. Almost all current clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection recommend that eligible patients pursue the optimal treatment endpoint, which is defined as HBsAg loss with or without anti-HBs seroconversion. This review describes the effects of various regimens containing pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-alpha on functional cure and the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with CHB. Peg-IFN-α monotherapy is a treatment option recommended by local and international clinical practice guidelines to help more CHB patients achieve a sustained off-treatment virological response, which is particularly appropriate for relatively young patients who demand a finite treatment approach. Peg-IFN-α add-on or sequential therapy in patients who have achieved a suppressed viral load after nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy may offer further benefits on HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg decline, although the effects of de novo combination therapy with peg-IFN-α and NAs on long-term outcomes remain unclear. Evaluation of baseline and on-treatment predictors is useful for selecting the patients who are likely to achieve additional benefits. Furthermore, some recent studies have shown that peg-IFN-α-based therapy results in better prevention of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially in high-risk patients.

Extended duration of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis B, HBeAg-negative and E genotype: A retrospective analysis

An alternative approach in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with pegylated (PEG)-interferon (IFN) is the prolonged course to 96 weeks of therapy, with higher sustained response (SR) than patients treated for 48 weeks. This result was confirmed in patients with CHB and D genotype, while no data are currently available about the prolonged course of PEG-IFN in E genotype. This retrospective analysis reported the role of different treatment duration of PEG-IFN on the SR in patients affected by CHB and E genotype. A total of 86 subjects with CHB and E genotype were considered in this analysis; different treatment durations were: 48 weeks (control group, 41 patients), 72 weeks (25 patients), and 96 weeks (19 patients). Treatment effectiveness was evaluated with sustained response (SR) and serological response. SR was significantly higher in patients who underwent PEG-IFN for 96 weeks in comparison to 48 weeks: 14.6% versus 26.3% (P = 0.016). HBsAg loss rate was 5.3% in patients treated for 96 weeks and 2.4% in the control group. In the multivariate analysis only the 72 and 96 weeks of therapy (OR 2.335, 95% CI 1.550-4.578; P = 0.020 and (OR 3.890, 95% CI 1.991-10.961; P = 0003) were predictive of SR. The extended duration of PEG-IFN course in patients with CHB and genotype E is a promising approach to increase the SR and HBsAg clearance.

Kinetics of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Level in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients who Achieved Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss during Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a Treatment

Background:

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss/seroconversion is considered to be the ideal endpoint of antiviral therapy and the ultimate treatment goal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to assess the patterns of HBsAg kinetics in CHB patients who achieved HBsAg loss during the treatment of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α-2a.

Methods:

A total of 150 patients were enrolled, composing of 83 hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 67 HBeAg-negative patients. Patients were treated with PEG-IFN α-2a180 μg/week until HBsAg loss/seroconversion was achieved, which occurred within 96 weeks. Serum hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid and serological indicators (HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, and anti-HBe) were determined before and every 3 months during PEG-IFN α-2a treatment. Biochemical markers and peripheral blood neutrophil and platelet counts were tested every 1–3 months.

Results:

Baseline HBsAg levels were 2.5 ± 1.3 log IU/ml, and decreased rapidly at 12 and 24 weeks by 48.3% and 88.3%, respectively. The mean time to HBsAg loss was 54.2 ± 30.4 weeks, though most patients needed extended treatment and 30.0% of HBsAg loss occurred during 72–96 weeks. Baseline HBsAg levels were significantly higher in HBeAg-positive patients (2.9 ± 1.1 log IU/ml) compared with HBeAg-negative patients (2.0 ± 1.3 log IU/ml; t = 4.733, P < 0.001), but the HBsAg kinetics were similar. Patients who achieved HBsAg loss within 48 weeks had significantly lower baseline HBsAg levels and had more rapid decline of HBsAg at 12 weeks compared to patients who needed extended treatment to achieve HBsAg loss.

Conclusions:

Patients with lower baseline HBsAg levels and more rapid decline during early treatment with PEG-IFN are more likely to achieve HBsAg loss during 96 weeks of treatment, and extended therapy longer than 48 weeks may be required to achieve HBsAg loss.

Response-guided peginterferon therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Response-guided therapy has been confirmed to be an effective strategy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the pegylated interferon (PegIFN) era, but no randomized trial utilizing this strategy has been conducted in chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, HBeAg positive patients were treated with PegIFN (180μg/week) for 24weeks. Early responders (HBsAg <1500IU/ml and HBV DNA <10(5)copies/ml at week 24) received PegIFN for a further 24weeks (arm A), while non-early responders were randomized to PegIFN for another 24weeks (arm B), another 72weeks (arm C) or PegIFN for another 72weeks plus adefovir for 36weeks (arm D). The primary endpoint was the change of quantitative HBsAg from baseline to the end of follow-up (EOF).

RESULTS

For non-early responders, 96-week PegIFN monotherapy did not lead to a greater reduction of HBsAg from baseline to EOF, compared with 48-week PegIFN (-0.71 vs. -0.67log10IU/ml, P=0.407). The rate of HBeAg seroconversion with HBV DNA <2000IU/ml at EOF were similar for arms B, C and D (17.9%, 23.9% and 25.0% respectively). For patients with HBsAg <1500IU/ml or HBV DNA <10(5)copies/ml at week 24, 38.4% and 37.0% achieved HBeAg seroconversion with HBV DNA <2000IU/ml at EOF respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HBsAg <1500IU/ml or HBV DNA <10(5)copies/ml at week 24 would benefit from continued PegIFN treatment. Extending the duration of PegIFN with or without adding adefovir did not show superiority over 48weeks PegIFN monotherapy.

LAY SUMMARY

Extending the duration of pegylated interferon (PegIFN) alfa-2a is not recommended in HBeAg positive patients as treatment extension beyond 48weeks did not show convincing benefit. Patients who achieved HBsAg <1500IU/ml or HBV DNA <10(5)copies/ml after 24-week PegIFNα-2a showed satisfactory outcome after the withdrawal of finite PegIFNα-2a treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT01086085.

On-treatment prediction of sustained response to peginterferon alfa-2a for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We assessed predictors of response in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Ninety-five HBeAg-negative patients received peginterferonalfa-2a for 48 weeks and were followed-up for 48 weeks post-treatment. Serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were monitored during and after therapy with valid commercial assays. Sustained response (SR) was defined as HBV DNA <2000 IU/ml at study week 96.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (23%) achieved SR and nine (9.5%) lost HBsAg. HBsAg decline was more profound in patients with SR. HBsAg decline ≥10% from baseline to week 24 was significantly associated with SR [81% (17/21) vs 37% (21/57); Odds ratio: 7.286 (2.162-24.552), P = 0.001]. The PARC rule (no decrease in HBsAg and <2 log drop in HBV DNA at week 12) was evaluated in a subset of 47 patients. Among eight patients who fulfilled the PARC rule, none achieved SR. Of the 39 patients who did not fulfil the PARC rule, 24 (62%) had HBsAg decline of ≥10% at week 24 (12 achieved SR) and 15 (38%) had HBsAg decline of <10% (1 achieved SR; negative predictive value: 93%).

CONCLUSIONS

In HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a, HBsAg decline >10% at 24 weeks is significantly associated with SR. The combination of the PARC rule and week 24 decline in HBsAg can identify almost two-thirds of patients who are unlikely to achieve SR. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01283074.

HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: why do I treat my patients with pegylated interferon-alfa?

HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is the most frequent and aggressive type of CHB. The current therapeutic options for CHB include pegylated-interferon-alfa (PEG-IFNα) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). NAs are well-tolerated and safe agents that effectively inhibit viral replication, but they should be given as long-term, probably lifelong therapy, in particular in HBeAg-negative CHB. Thus, the finite, usually 48-week, duration is the main advantage of PEG-IFNα, providing sustained virological responses (SVR) off-therapy in approximately one-fourth of patients with HBeAg-negative CHB and often leading to HBsAg loss. However, the limited efficacy is the main factor restricting the use of PEG-IFNα in CHB and therefore identifying the predictors of response is of great clinical importance. No reliable baseline predictors of response to PEG-IFNα have been identified to date, but certain studies have identified satisfactory predictors of post-PEG-IFNα response using on-treatment serological markers, mostly HBsAg levels. In particular, in HBeAg-negative CHB patients mostly with genotype D a lack of decline in HBsAg levels and a lack of decrease in HBV DNA levels ≥2 log10 copies/ml at week-12 has a nearly 100% negative predictive value for SVR off-treatment and is now recommended as a stopping rule for early discontinuation of ineffective PEG-IFNα. Prolonging PEG-IFNα therapy to 96 weeks seems to provide higher SVR rates but the application and efficacy of this approach requires further study. The combination of PEG-IFNα with NAs, mostly lamivudine, has not resulted in any therapeutic benefit so far, but newer combined approaches with PEG-IFNα and NA(s) are currently under study.

Results of treatment of chronic hepatitis B with pegylated interferon

Persistent viral eradication or suppression through a defined course of Pegylated-interferon (PegIFN) or the administration of a long-term potent nucleot(s)ide analogues (NUCs) can impact positively the natural course of HBV infection by preventing disease progression. Despite the higher rates of off-therapy response achieved with PegIFN compared with NUC, its benefits are restricted to a subgroup of patients only. To increase the rates of patients who may benefit from PegIFN treatment, minimizing the adverse events, careful patient selections based on baseline features and on treatment HBsAg kinetics for individual treatment optimization are required.

Efficacy of sequential use of telbivudine in hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with partial responses to pegylated interferon: a pilot study

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of sequential use of telbivudine in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with partial responses to pegylated interferon. Patients with partial responses to 48 weeks of pegylated interferon treatment were divided into two groups. In group A, patients stopped pegylated interferon directly without sequential treatment. In group B, patients received sequential treatment with telbivudine 600 mg/day. HBeAg, HBeAb, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatine kinase levels were determined at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48. Responses and safety were assessed after 48 weeks of telbivudine treatment. Thirty-six patients were recruited. Eighteen of these patients stopped pegylated interferon without sequential treatment (group A). After 48 weeks of follow-up, five patients (28%) had undergone HBeAg seroconversion, nine patients (50%) had undetectable levels of HBV DNA, and 11 patients (61%) achieved normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. The other 18 patients received sequential telbivudine treatment (group B). After 48 weeks of treatment, 11 patients (61%) had undergone HBeAg seroconversion, and all patients had undetectable levels of HBV DNA and normal ALT levels. All patients tolerated sequential telbivudine treatment, and only slightly elevated creatine kinase levels were observed. Switching to telbivudine therapy was efficient and safe in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with partial responses to 48 weeks of pegylated interferon. Sequential treatment with telbivudine resulted in an HBeAg seroconversion rate of 61% and an HBV DNA loss rate of 100% after 48 weeks. This promising strategy warrants further investigation.

Association of on-treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen level with sustained virological response to nucleos(t)ide analog in patients with hepatitis B e-antigen positive chronic hepatitis B

AIM

  This study evaluated the on-treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level during nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy and the correlation with off-treatment sustained virological response (SVR).

METHODS

  Fifty-one consecutive patients with hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B who achieved HBeAg loss/seroconversion after NUC therapy and completed 12 months or more of additional therapy were included. Serum HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were determined at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and at the end of treatment. SVR was defined as HBV DNA levels of less than 10 000 copies/mL until 6 or 12 months off-treatment without reappearance of HBeAg.

RESULTS

  Twenty-two (43.1%) and 13 (25.5%) patients maintained SVR at 6 and 12 months off-treatment, respectively. In univariate analyses, a decline of HBsAg of 0.5 log(10)  IU/mL or less at 6 months (P = 0.006) and 12 months (P = 0.013), the mean change in HBsAg level at 6 months (P = 0.024), and lamivudine or entecavir treatment (P = 0.019) were significant predictive factors for SVR at 6 months off-treatment. A decline of HBsAg of 0.5 log(10)  IU/mL or less at 6 months and lamivudine or entecavir treatment were independent factors on multivariate analyses (odds ratio [OR], 16.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.86-142.86 [P = 0.012]; and OR, 14.83; 95% CI, 1.18-185.73 [P = 0.036]; respectively).

CONCLUSION

  On-treatment serum HBsAg level predicted early off-treatment SVR to NUC therapy in patients infected with genotype C.

Why do I treat HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with pegylated interferon?

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in serum HBeAg negative patients is a difficult to cure, progressive disease leading to end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, there are two different treatment strategies for such patients: a finite course of Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) or long-term administration of the more potent and less resistance-prone nucleot(s)ide analogues (NUC), i.e. entecavir and tenofovir. Although NUC may ensure persistent viral suppression by preventing disease progression in most patients, they require lifelong administration with the hypothetical disadvantages of cost, lack of long-term safety data and, most important, the null rates of HBsAg seroclearance. On the other hand, 1 year of PEG-IFN has the advantage of providing an immune-mediated control of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with the possibility of achieving a sustained off-treatment response in 20% of the patients, ultimately leading to HBsAg loss in approximately 50% of these. However, these sustained response rates can be significantly increased by carefully selecting candidates for PEG-IFN therapy based upon baseline ALT and HBV DNA levels, viral genotype and IL28B polymorphisms, by extending PEG-IFN therapy beyond 48 weeks and, most importantly, by applying early on-treatment stopping rules based upon HBsAg kinetics. Overall, PEG-IFN is an ideal treatment strategy in selected patients with HBeAg-negative CHB, because of its well-recognized and predictable safety profile and a unique mechanism of antiviral activity leading to long-lasting immune control. Because of these features, new therapeutic trials based upon a combination of PEG-IFN and third generation NUC such as entecavir and tenofovir, in both naïve and NUC-exposed patients, are ongoing to further increase the rates of HBsAg seroclearance, which remains the 'ideal end-point' in all HBeAg-negative CHB subjects.

Long-term follow-up of hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients treated with peginterferon α-2a: progressive decrease in hepatitis B surface antigen in responders

OBJECTIVE

Peginterferon (PEG-IFN) is considered as a first-line treatment option for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. We aimed to evaluate the long-term response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative patients.

METHODS

All patients enrolled in the PARC study who completed the treatment phase were eligible for this long-term follow-up (LTFU) study. Patients received PEG-IFN α-2a (180 μg weekly) ± ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 48 weeks and had at least one additional LTFU visit after the initial follow-up period of 24 weeks (mean duration 2.1 ± 0.2 years). Retreated patients were considered nonresponders.

RESULTS

Of 117 patients who completed the treatment phase, 79 (68%) were included in this LTFU study. Among 19 patients with a combined response at 24 weeks after treatment [initial responders; hepatitis B virus DNA<10 000 copies/ml (<1714 IU/ml) and normal alanine aminotransferase], 12 (63%) sustained this response through LTFU. Three additional patients showed such a response at LTFU, resulting in a total of 15 (19%) combined responders at LTFU. A marked decrease in the serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels was observed in initial responders, resulting in HBsAg clearance in 26% of the patients (6% of all LTFU participants).

CONCLUSION

About one-third of HBeAg-negative patients with a response to PEG-IFN at 24 weeks after treatment subsequently had a relapse during 2 years of follow-up. Despite the limited overall efficacy of PEG-IFN, patients responding to PEG-IFN treatment showed a marked decrease in serum HBsAg, resulting in a high rate of HBsAg clearance, which indicates the need for predictors of response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative disease.

Ischemic colitis during interferon-ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C: A case report

Ischemic colitis is a rare complication of interferon administration. Only 9 cases in 6 reports have been described to-date. This report describes a case of ischemic colitis during pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C, and includes a review of the relevant literature. A 48-year-old woman was treated with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C, genotype Ib. After 19 wk of treatment, the patient complained of severe afebrile abdominal pain with hematochezia. Vital signs were stable and serum white blood cell count was within the normal range. Abdominal computed tomography showed diffuse colonic wall thickening from the splenic flexure to the proximal sigmoid colon, which is the most vulnerable area for the development of ischemic colitis. Colonoscopy revealed an acute mucosal hyperemic change, with edema and ulcerations extending from the proximal descending colon to the sigmoid colon. Colonic mucosal biopsy revealed acute exudative colitis. Polymerase chain reaction and culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis were negative and the cultures for cytomegalovirus, Salmonella and Shigella species were negative. After discontinuation of interferon and ribavirin therapy, abdominal pain and hematochezia subsided and, following colonoscopy showed improvement of the mucosal ulcerations. Ischemic colitis cases during interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C reported so far have all involved the descending colon. Ischemic colitis is a rarely encountered complication of interferon administration in patients with chronic hepatitis C and should be considered when a patient complains of abdominal pain and hematochezia.

Validation of a stopping rule at week 12 using HBsAg and HBV DNA for HBeAg-negative patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It was recently demonstrated that none of the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients without any serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline and with <2log hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA decline at week 12 of a 48-week peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) treatment course achieved a sustained response (SR). We aimed at validating this stopping rule in two independent trials.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative patients receiving 48 or 96 weeks of PEG-IFN in the phase III registration trial (N=85) and PegBeLiver study (N=75) were stratified according to the presence of any HBsAg decline and/or 2log HBV DNA decline at week 12. SR was defined as HBV DNA <2000IU/ml and normal alanine aminotransferase 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

The original PARC trial included 102 patients (genotype A/D/other: 14/81/7), 25 (25%) had an SR. The validation dataset consisted of 160 patients (genotype A/B/C/D/other: 10/18/34/91/7), 57 (36%) achieved an SR. The stopping rule performed well across the two studies (p=0.001) and its negative predictive value [NPV] was 95% in the validation dataset harbouring genotypes A-D. Its performance was best for genotype D. Moreover, among the 34 patients treated for 96 weeks, none of the 7 (21%) without HBsAg decline and with <2log HBV DNA decline at week 12 achieved an SR (NPV 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed in two independent studies that the combination of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels at week 12 identifies HBeAg-negative patients with a very low chance of SR to either 48 or 96 weeks of PEG-IFN therapy.

Efficacy of peginterferon α-2a and predictors of response in HBeAg-negative, genotype D-naive patients

BACKGROUND

Peginterferon (PEG-IFN) α-2a has been shown to induce a sustained virologic response (SVR) in 20-30% of "hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)"-negative patients.

AIM

To determine the safety and efficacy of PEG-IFN α-2a in HBeAg-negative, genotype D-naive patients and to analyze the predictors of response.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized trial was conducted at four hospitals. A total of 35 consecutive HBeAg-negative naive genotype D patients received PEG-IFN α-2a for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Based on a cutoff of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <400 copies ml(-1), an early virologic response (EVR) at week 12, end of treatment virologic response (ETVR) at week 48, and SVR at week 72 were achieved by 3 (9%), 9 (26%), and 8 patients (23%), respectively. The EVR rate improved to 43%, ETVR to 49%, and SVR to 57%, when a HBV DNA cutoff level of <20,000 copies ml(-1) was used. Pretreatment HBsAg level was not a predictor for SVR on univariate analysis, but correlated with decline in HBV DNA levels at weeks 48 and 72. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, low body weight, high alanine aminotransferase (ALT), low HBV DNA, and low triglyceride levels were identified as baseline predictors of SVR.

CONCLUSION

HBeAg-negative genotype D-naive patients treated with PEG-IFN α-2a achieved SVR in 23 (HBV <400 copies ml(-1)) and 57% (HBV <20,000 copies ml(-1)) of patients, a better response than previously reported that might be related to the absence of drug resistance in these naive patients. Pretreatment predictors of SVR were low body weight, high ALT, low HBV DNA, and low triglycerides.

Optimization of adefovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B according to baseline predictors and on-treatment HBV DNA: a 5-year prospective study

Background

Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) is an important agent to suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication with suboptimal effect on virological and serological response. To optimize Adefovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, we studied the baseline parameters and on-treatment HBV DNA for favorable outcomes.

Methods

48 patients were enrolled in the study and followed up for 5 years prospectively. Baseline characteristics, virological, serological and biochemical parameters as well as on treatment HBV DNA were assessed in prediction of favorable outcomes.

Results

1. The patients with baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5 × the upper limit of normal (ULN, 40 IU/L) had higher rates of viral response (VR), HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion at year 5 compared to the patients with ALT < 5 × ULN (VR: 75% vs 43.8%, p = 0.035; HBeAg loss: 43.9% vs 13.8%, p = 0.017; HBeAg seroconversion: 37.9% vs 13.8%, p = 0.035); Patients with baseline HBV DNA < 10⁹ copies/ml and ALT ≥3 × ULN had more chance of HBeAg seroconversion (40.9% vs 8.7%, p = 0.012), while in patients with HBeAg < 800 s/co or HBsAg < 5000 IU/ml higher rates of HBeAg loss were achieved. 2. HBV DNA level < 10⁴ copies/ml at week 24 was predictive for VR (96.0% vs 40.9%, P < 0.001), HBeAg loss (84.0% vs 36.3%, P = 0.001) and HBeAg seroconversion (36.0% vs 9.1%, P = 0.030).

Conclusions

ADV treatment should be started for patients with baseline ALT≥5 × ULN or patients with ALT≥3 × ULN and HBV DNA < 10⁹ copies/ml. Lower level of HBeAg(< 800 s/co) and HBsAg(< 5000 IU/ml) may be regarded as referenced factors. In patients with serum HBV DNA < 10⁴ copies/ml at week 24 the therapy should continue, and a favorable outcome may be achieved in 5 years or longer.

Current status of antiviral therapy for hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major public health problem affecting up to 400 million people globally. Complications of CHB including liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma result in 1.2 million deaths per year, making CHB the 10th leading cause of mortality worldwide. The natural history of CHB is variable and complex. The past decade witnessed important developments for the therapy of hepatitis B and marked the new era of oral therapy. The ultimate goal of CHB therapy is to arrest the progression of liver injury and to prevent the development of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, six agents are approved for the treatment of CHB. Each of these agents, given as monotherapy, has been shown to produce virological, biochemical, and histological benefits for both HBeAg positive and negative CHB. There are, however, limitations in spite of their efficacy. The significant side-effect profile of interferon, for example, limits its long-term use. The approved oral agents are tolerable with prolonged use but drug resistance could limit long-term monotherapy. To date, combination therapy with nucleoside analogue and pegylated interferon or two nucleos(t)ide analogues given for one year does not show superiority in durability of response compared to monotherapy. Ongoing research effort is critical to identify the ideal hepatitis B therapy that is safe, effective, and produces durable response with a finite course of therapy. It is equally important to conduct a well designed, prospective natural history study to identify predictors of disease progression. This will accurately guide treatment strategy for this important disease.

Patient management and clinical decision making in HBV--aims of therapy and what we can achieve

International treatment guidelines for hepatitis B emphasize alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum HBV DNA thresholds, but strict adherence to these markers might lead to missed opportunities in some patients with acquisition in early life. Clinical trials have used improvement in liver histology, rate of hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and sustained HBV DNA suppression as primary end points. These are potentially short-term end points because HBV infection can not be eradicated and delayed relapses might occur. The closest end point to a clinical cure of disease is the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The ability of interferon to stimulate the immune response of the host might explain the higher rate of early HBsAg clearance when compared with nucleoside analogues. Early studies suggest that combination therapy with interferon and long-term treatment with nucleoside analogues might lead to an even higher rate of HBsAg seroconversion. Measuring HBsAg concentration during therapy might provide an early indication that a durable virological response, including HBsAg clearance, is likely to occur. Thus far, this has been best studied using interferon. The relationship of this phenomenon to viral genotype will be discussed. There is a need for more flexible on-treatment criteria for hepatitis B. HBsAg clearance remains the best therapeutic end point, but is not readily achievable with current treatments. Future treatment paradigms should take into account the duration as well as the extent of viraemia, place less reliance on the ALT level to indicate the extent of liver injury and consider the possibility that maintenance therapy can prevent liver disease complications.

Antiviral drugs for HBV liver disease

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection affects about 400 million people around the globe and is among the world's leading causes of death. The management of CHB has evolved rapidly, several therapeutic options are now available to prevent both progression of liver disease and anticipated liver morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

Current treatment modalities for CHB patients, together with suggestions from our own experience are summarized. The most relevant works published in recent years on pegylated interferon, nucleos(t)ides analogues (NUC) and the 2009 update of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines and the 2009 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Pegylated interferon and NUC have advantages and limitations, as short-term interferon treatment induces a sustained virological response in a third of patients, whereas long-term suppressive therapy by NUC rapidly inhibits HBV replication in most patients but drug resistance and safety in the long-term will remain the most important unresolved questions. Careful evaluation of patient history, staging of liver disease and virological factors should guide the start of treatment and the choice to the most appropriate individualized treatment strategy in all CHB patients.

Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with pegylated interferon

Serum HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, which is usually a late stage of chronic hepatitis B virus infection, is difficult to treat, because it is characterized by fluctuating alanine transaminase values resulting in hepatitis flares, accelerated progression to cirrhosis and liver cancer. Antiviral treatment, either long-term nucleot(s)ide therapy or 1-year administration of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), is therefore necessary to limit the course of the disease. A sustained virological response to PEG-IFN is achieved in approximately 1/4 of the patients, with significant rates of HBsAg seroclearance. While waiting for the results of several studies whose goal is to improve the long-term efficacy of PEG-IFN, the treatment strategy can be optimized by a careful selection of patients, discontinuation of PEG-IFN as early as possible in primary non-responders and extended therapy (up to 96 weeks) in responders.

Change in serum hepatitis B surface antigen level and its clinical significance in treatment-naïve, hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients receiving entecavir

BACKGROUND/AIM

We investigated changes in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level and its correlation with clinical outcomes in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients undergoing entecavir therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 51 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive treatment-naive CHB patients receiving entecavir for more than 1 year, 28 were enrolled. HBsAg levels were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment using the Architect HBsAg QT assay (Abbott, dynamic; range: 0.05 to 125,000 IU/mL). Serum alanine aminotransferase, HBeAg, anti-HBe, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (Cobas Taqman: low detection limit 1.84 log10 copies/mL) were measured at baseline and every 3 months. The HBsAg response was defined as an HBsAg level that decreased more than 1 log10 IU/mL from baseline level at 12 months after entecavir treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were treated for a median period of 21 months (range: 18 to 24 mo). Serum HBsAg level showed a mean of 4.0, 3.7, and 3.6 log10 IU/mL at pretreatment, 6, and 12 months, respectively, and declined significantly (P<0.001). Serum HBV DNA level showed a mean of 8.1, 3.1, and 2.4 log10 copies/mL at pretreatment, 6, and 12 months, respectively, and declined significantly (P<0.001). The decline in HBsAg level was significantly correlated with that of the HBV DNA level at 12 months from baseline (γ=0.391, P=0.044). Five patients showed an HBsAg response, and cumulative incidence of HBeAg loss at 1 year after entecavir treatment was 80% versus 30% in patients with an HBsAg response and those without, respectively (P=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring changes in quantitative HBsAg level could be a useful parameter for assessing the response to entecavir therapy in HBeAg-positive treatment-naive CHB patients.

A randomized trial of peginterferon alpha-2a with or without ribavirin for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B patients are at high risk of treatment relapse after any antiviral therapy. Combining peginterferon alpha-2a with ribavirin might improve sustained response rates.

METHODS

Overall, 138 HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients were randomized to receive monotherapy (peginterferon alpha-2a 180 microg weekly plus placebo) or combination therapy (peginterferon alpha-2a weekly plus ribavirin 1,000 or 1,200 mg daily, depending on body weight) for 48 weeks. Post-treatment follow-up lasted 24 weeks. Analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat population after exclusion of five patients.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, 14 (20%) of 69 patients assigned to monotherapy and 10 (16%) of 64 assigned to combination therapy had a combined response (hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <10,000 copies/ml (<1,714 IU/ml) and a normal alanine aminotransferase level, P=0.49). At the end of treatment, more patients had a combined response (25 (36%) vs. 26 (41%) in the monotherapy and combination therapy group, respectively, P=0.60), but subsequently relapsed during follow-up. Serum HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels decreased during treatment (mean change at week 48 compared with baseline -3.9 vs. -2.6 log copies/ml, P<0.001 and -0.56 vs. -0.34 log IU/ml, P=0.23, respectively). HBV DNA levels relapsed after treatment discontinuation; HBsAg remained at end-of-treatment levels. In general, combination therapy was well tolerated, although it was associated with a higher risk of anemia and neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with peginterferon alpha-2a resulted in a limited sustained response rate in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. Addition of ribavirin did not improve response to therapy.

Early on-treatment prediction of response to peginterferon alfa-2a for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B using HBsAg and HBV DNA levels

Peginterferon alfa-2a results in a sustained response (SR) in a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study investigated the role of early on-treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in the prediction of SR in HBeAg-negative patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a. HBsAg (Architect from Abbott) was quantified at the baseline and during treatment (weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48) and follow-up (weeks 60 and 72) in the sera from 107 patients who participated in an international multicenter trial (peginterferon alfa-2a, n = 53, versus peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin, n = 54). Overall, 24 patients (22%) achieved SR [serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level < 10,000 copies/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase levels at week 72]. Baseline characteristics were comparable between sustained responders and nonresponders. From week 8 onward, serum HBsAg levels markedly decreased in sustained responders, whereas only a modest decline was observed in nonresponders. However, HBsAg declines alone were of limited value in the prediction of SR [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) at weeks 4, 8, and 12 = 0.59, 0.56, and 0.69, respectively]. Combining the declines in HBsAg and HBV DNA allowed the best prediction of SR (AUC at week 12 = 0.74). None of the 20 patients (20% of the study population) in whom a decrease in serum HBsAg levels was absent and whose HBV DNA levels declined less than 2 log copies/mL exhibited an SR (negative predictive value = 100%).

CONCLUSION

At week 12 of peginterferon alfa-2a treatment for HBeAg-negative CHB, a solid stopping rule was established with a combination of declines in serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels from the baseline. Quantitative serum HBsAg in combination with HBV DNA enables on-treatment adjustments of peginterferon therapy for HBeAg-negative CHB.

Precise prediction model and simplified scoring system for sustained combined response to interferon-α

AIM: To establish a predictive algorithm which may serve for selecting optimal candidates for interferon-α (IFN-α) treatment.

METHODS: A total of 474 IFN-α treated hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients’ baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, blood tests, activity grading (G) of intrahepatic inflammation, score (S) of liver fibrosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and genotype were evaluated; therapy duration and response of each patient at the 24th wk after cessation of IFN-α treatment were also recorded. A predictive algorithm and scoring system for a sustained combined response (CR) to IFN-α therapy were established. About 10% of the patients were randomly drawn as the test set. Responses to IFN-α therapy were divided into CR, partial response (PR) and non-response (NR). The mixed set of PR and NR was recorded as PR+NR.

RESULTS: Stratified by therapy duration, the most significant baseline predictive factors were alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBV DNA level, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), HBV genotype, S, G, age and gender. According to the established model, the accuracies for sustained CR and PR+NR, respectively, were 86.4% and 93.0% for the training set, 81.5% and 91.0% for the test set. For the scoring system, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.8% and 80.6%, respectively. There were positive correlations between ALT and AST, and G and S, respectively.

CONCLUSION: With these models, practitioners may be able to propose individualized decisions that have an integrated foundation on both evidence-based medicine and personal characteristics.

Pros and Cons of Peginterferon Versus Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

The emergence of new and more potent treatment options has markedly changed the treatment landscape of chronic hepatitis B. Both peginterferon and nucleos(t)ide analogues have considerable advantages and limitations, and current treatment guidelines refrain from clearly suggesting a first-line treatment option. Peginterferon offers the advantage of higher sustained response rates in both hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, at the price of considerable side effects and high costs. Nucleos(t)ide analogues offer easy daily oral dosing, and newly registered agents can maintain viral suppression for prolonged treatment duration. However, relapse is common after therapy discontinuation and extended therapy therefore often necessary. Prolonged treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues may enhance chances of virologic and serologic response at the potential cost of the emergence of viral resistance and side effects. Baseline and on-treatment prediction of response may help select patients for peginterferon therapy and can aid individualized treatment decisions concerning therapy continuation or discontinuation.

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD): A review of its use in chronic hepatitis B

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) [Pegasys] comprises an inert, branched, 40 kD polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety attached to interferon-alpha-2a. Subcutaneous peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is indicated for the treatment of adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or -negative chronic hepatitis B who have compensated liver disease with evidence of viral replication and hepatic inflammation. Subcutaneous peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) has antiviral and immunomodulatory properties and a convenient once-weekly administration schedule. Forty-eight weeks of therapy with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) with or without lamivudine was more effective than lamivudine alone in achieving a sustained response in patients with HBeAg-positive or -negative chronic hepatitis B. A long-term follow-up study in patients with HBeAg-positive disease who received peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) monotherapy revealed an HBeAg seroconversion rate of 42%, 1 year after the end of treatment. A long-term follow-up study in patients with HBeAg-negative disease who received peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) with or without lamivudine revealed hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance in 12% of patients and inactive chronic hepatitis B in 17% of patients, 5 years after the end of treatment. Various predictors of response may be useful in terms of identifying patients who may be candidates for shorter or longer peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) treatment durations. For example, quantifying serum HBeAg (in HBeAg-positive disease) and HBsAg levels during therapy may be useful. Adverse events typical of the influenza-like symptoms seen with alpha-interferons occurred more frequently in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) with or without lamivudine than in those receiving lamivudine alone. In conclusion, peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is a valuable option for the first-line treatment of HBeAg-negative or -positive chronic hepatitis B.

[Characteristics of hepatitis and influenza antivirals: update 2009]

This article aims to review hepatitis B and C and influenza infections and to summarise the main characteristics of the antiviral drugs available to treat those infections in adults. The review of each drug focuses on dosage depending on treatment indication, dosage adjustment in renal or hepatic impairment, main pharmacokinetic features and the most significant adverse effects and drug interactions.

Chronic hepatitis B: whom to treat and for how long? Propositions, challenges, and future directions

Recent guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the European Association for the Study of the Liver, and the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver 2008 update of the "Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B" offer comprehensive recommendations for the general management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). These recommendations highlight preferred approaches to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CHB. Nonetheless, the results of recent studies have led to an improved understanding of the disease and a belief that current recommendations on specific therapeutic considerations, including CHB treatment initiation and cessation criteria, particularly in patient populations with special circumstances, can be improved. Twelve experts from the Asia-Pacific region formed the Asia-Pacific Panel Recommendations for the Optimal Management of Chronic Hepatitis B (APPROACH) Working Group to review, challenge, and assess relevant new data and inform future updates of CHB treatment guidelines. The significance of and controversy about reported findings were discussed and debated in an expert meeting of the Working Group in Beijing, China, in November 2008. This review paper attempts to identify areas requiring improved CHB management and provide suggestions for future guideline updates, with special emphasis on treatment initiation and duration.

High rates of HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients responding to interferon: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To assess the HBsAg seroconversion rate and its impact on the long-term outcome in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with conventional interferon, and to analyze the serum HBsAg concentration prior to seroconversion.

METHODS

Ninety-seven HBeAg-positive patients were retrospectively evaluated. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable serum HBV-DNA 48 weeks after treatment discontinuation. HBsAg level was assessed at yearly intervals until seroconversion in SVRs.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (26%) achieved SVR. By multivariate analysis, SVR was associated with low serum HBV DNA level and severe liver fibrosis. During a median follow-up of 14 years (range, 5-20 years), 28 patients (29%) developed HBsAg seroconversion including 16 SVRs (64%) and 12 non-SVRs (16%), p < 0.001. HBsAg quantification showed a major decrease (median = 46%, range = 19-100%) in the first year after interferon starting in SVR patients. Six patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, none of them had undergone HBsAg seroconversion. Liver fibrosis improved in 70% of patients with HBsAg seroconversion compared to 30% of those without HBsAg seroconversion (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg seroconversion is achieved with a high steady rate in patients responding to interferon, and associated with excellent outcome. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the utility of on-treatment quantitative serum HBsAg in interferon-based therapy.

Benefits and risks of interferon therapy for hepatitis B

Alpha interferon is the only licensed drug for hepatitis B with immunomodulatory as well as viral inhibitory properties. Potential advantages of interferon compared to nucleoside analogs include a lack of drug resistance, a finite and defined treatment course, and a higher likelihood for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance. Approximately 30% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 40% of HBeAg-negative cases have a sustained virological response (when defined as HBeAg seroconversion and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels below 20,000 copies/mL, respectively) 6 months after completion of a 48-week course of peginterferon alfa-2a These responses remain durable in 80% and 50% of cases, respectively, when evaluated several years later. Recent studies have shown that changes in HBsAg and HBeAg concentration during treatment predict sustained virological response and serial monitoring of HBsAg is helpful in predicting HBsAg clearance. HBeAg-positive patients with genotype A have higher rates of HBeAg and HBsAg clearance, whereas HBeAg-negative patients with genotype D have the lowest rate of response to interferon therapy. Long-term follow-up of virological responders to either standard alpha interferon or peginterferon has demonstrated a progressive increase in the rate of HBsAg clearance, particularly in patients who were initially HBeAg-positive. Future studies need to address if specific virological benchmarks during therapy can be used to tailor treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

Peginterferon alfa has a place as first-line therapy of hepatitis B in patients who are carefully selected on the basis of pretreatment serum HBV DNA and aminotransferase levels, safety considerations, and viral genotype.

Hepatitis B virus surface antigen levels: a guide to sustained response to peginterferon alfa-2a in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

We investigated the relationship between hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) serum level decline and posttreatment response in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B from a large multinational study of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (peginterferon alfa-2a), with or without lamivudine, versus lamivudine alone. Serum HBsAg was quantified using the Architect assay (Abbott Diagnostics) at pretreatment, end of treatment (week 48), and 6 months after the end of treatment (week 72) in sera from 386 of the 537 patients who participated in the multinational study (peginterferon alfa-2a, 127; peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, 137; lamivudine monotherapy, 122). Pretreatment HBsAg levels varied according to genotype, with the highest levels present in patients infected with genotypes A (median, 4.11 log(10) IU/mL) and D (median, 3.85 log(10) IU/mL). Significant on-treatment decline in HBsAg was observed during treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (alone or combined with lamivudine; mean decline at week 48, -0.71 and -0.67 log(10) IU/mL, respectively, P < 0.001), but not during treatment with lamivudine alone (-0.02 log(10) IU/mL). Significantly more patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (21%) or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (17%) achieved HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL at the end of treatment compared with lamivudine (1%) (both P < 0.001 versus lamivudine). End-of-treatment HBsAg level correlated strongly with HBV DNA suppression to <or=400 copies/mL 6 months posttreatment. An HBsAg level <10 IU/mL at week 48 and on-treatment decline >1 log(10) IU/mL were significantly associated with sustained HBsAg clearance 3 years after treatment (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

On-treatment quantification of HBsAg in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B treated with peginterferon alfa-2a may help identify those likely to be cured by this therapy and optimize treatment strategies.

Early serum HBsAg drop: a strong predictor of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon alfa-2a in HBeAg-negative patients

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) may induce sustained virological response (SVR) in 20% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. In addition, loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is achieved with a 10% yearly rate after treatment cessation in sustained responders. The aim of this study was to assess on-treatment serum HBsAg kinetics to predict SVR in HBeAg-negative patients treated with PEG-IFN. Forty-eight consecutive patients were treated with PEG-IFN (180 microg/week) for 48 weeks. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (COBAS TaqMan) and HBsAg (Abbott Architect HBsAg QT assay) were assessed at baseline, during treatment (weeks 12, 24, and 48), and during follow-up (weeks 72 and 96). SVR was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA (<70 copies/mL) 24 weeks after treatment cessation. Twenty-five percent of patients achieved SVR. They were not different from those who failed treatment regarding age, sex, ethnicity, HBV genotype, baseline serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels, or liver histology. During treatment, serum HBsAg levels decreased only in patients who developed SVR, with mean decreases of 0.8 +/- 0.5, 1.5 +/- 0.6, and 2.1 +/- 1.2 log(10) IU/mL at weeks 12, 24, and 48, respectively. A decrease of 0.5 and 1 log(10) IU/mL in serum HBsAg levels at weeks 12 and 24 of therapy, respectively, had high predictive values of SVR (negative predictive value [NPV] 90%, positive predictive value [PPV] 89% for week 12; NPV 97%, PPV 92% for week 24). HBsAg loss was observed in three patients, all with SVR.

CONCLUSION

Early serum HBsAg drop has high predictive values of SVR to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative CHB patients. Serum quantitative HBsAg may be a useful tool to optimize the management of PEG-IFN therapy in these patients.

A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: 2008 update

Chronic HBV infection is an important public health problem worldwide and in the United States. A treatment algorithm for the management of this disease, published previously by a panel of U.S. hepatologists, has been revised on the basis of new developments in the understanding of the disorder, the availability of more sensitive molecular diagnostic tests, and the licensure of new therapies. In addition, a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of new treatments has led to the development of strategies for reducing the rate of resistance associated with oral agents and optimizing treatment outcomes. This updated algorithm was based primarily on available evidence by using a systematic review of the literature. Where data were lacking, the panel relied on clinical experience and consensus expert opinion. The primary aim of antiviral therapy is durable suppression of serum HBV DNA to low or undetectable levels. Assays can now detect serum HBV DNA at levels as low as 10 IU/mL and should be used to establish a baseline level, monitor response to antiviral therapy, and survey for the development of drug resistance. Interferon alfa-2b, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, peginterferon alfa-2a, telbivudine, and tenofovir are approved as initial therapy for chronic hepatitis B and have certain advantages and disadvantages. Although all of these agents can be used in selected patients, the preferred first-line treatment choices are entecavir, peginterferon alfa-2a, and tenofovir. Issues for consideration for therapy include efficacy, safety, rate of resistance, method of administration, and cost.

Peginterferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the era of nucleos(t)ide analogues

The practising clinician is currently faced with a number of effective treatment options for chronic hepatitis B, including two formulations of interferon (standard IFN and pegylated IFN) and five nucleos(t)ide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir). Treatment strategies can be divided into those aiming for sustained response after discontinuation of therapy and those that need to be maintained by prolonged antiviral therapy. Sustained response is particularly achieved with interferon-based therapy, while treatment-maintained response can be achieved with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in the majority of patients. Of currently available drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, PEG-IFN seems to result in the highest rate of off-treatment sustained response after a 1-year course of therapy. Sustained transition to the immune-control phase (inactive HBsAg carrier state) can be achieved in 30-35% of HBeAg-positive patients and 20-25% of HBeAg-negative patients. Loss of HBsAg has been observed in 11% of both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients after 3-4 years. Since hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype is an important predictor of response to PEG-IFN, determination of HBV genotype is essential in patients in whom sustained off-treatment response is pursued. Aiming for sustained response is of particular interest because many HBV-infected patients are in need of antiviral therapy at a young age and may otherwise require indefinite antiviral therapy.

Novel therapies in hepatitis B and C

Chronic hepatitis B and C affect approximately 500 million people in the world, with substantial disease burden including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. For chronic hepatitis B, two treatment strategies are currently available, both with suboptimal response and significant side effects. Promising new drugs are approaching the stage of approval; however, these agents still need further development to control this disease. Based on the understanding of the hepatitis C virus life cycle, new treatment developments for chronic hepatitis C tend to succeed rapidly; therefore, it is only a matter of time before new therapies emerge. This review summarizes the most important new agents available for treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C.

Hepatitis B: reflections on the current approach to antiviral therapy

This article summarizes the current state of antiviral therapy of hepatitis B with special attention given to areas that remain controversial or poorly defined. Strict adherence to liver association practice guidelines may result in missed opportunities to treat patients with significant underlying liver disease. In particular, recommended ALT thresholds may not appropriately reflect disease activity or degree of fibrosis. There is growing evidence that an alternative treatment paradigm for preventing late-stage disease complications may be indicated in highly viremic patients with early life exposure to hepatitis B. Pegylated interferon therapy is often a better choice for young to middle-aged patients with genotype A and B because of the higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion and a greater chance for HBsAg seroconversion in both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients as compared to nucleoside analogs. Nucleoside analog monotherapy is the current standard of care for many patients. However, long-term monotherapy results in resistance to a variable degree and sequential monotherapy may result in multi-drug resistant virus. Which patients would specifically benefit from early combination therapy also remains poorly defined. The rapidity and robustness of the suppression of HBV DNA while on a nucleoside analog should be monitored relatively early during treatment because it affects treatment outcome and the rate of resistance. While great progress has been made in treating hepatitis B, many important issues require further study.