Interferon-based treatment of chronic hepatitis D

Treatment of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection has been based on the administration of interferon-alfa for more than three decades. First studies to treat HDV-infected patients with type 1 interferons were already performed in the 1980s. Several smaller trials and case series were reported thereafter. During the mid 2000s the use of pegylated interferons for hepatitis D was established. Since then, additional trials were performed in different countries exploring strategies to personalize treatment including extended treatment durations. The overall findings were that about one-quarter to one-third of patients benefit from interferon treatment with persistent suppression of HDV replication. However, only few patients achieve also functional cure of hepatitis B with HBsAg loss. Importantly, several studies indicate that successful interferon treatment is associated with improved clinical long-term outcomes. Still, only a proportion of patients with hepatitis D can be treated with interferons. Even though alternative treatments are currently developed, it is likely that pegylated interferon-alfa will still have an important role in the management of hepatitis D - either alone or in combination. Therefore, better biomarkers are needed to select patients with a high likelihood to benefit from interferon-based treatments. In this review we are discussing basic principles of mode of action of interferon alpha against HDV, summarize previous data on interferon treatment of hepatitis D and give an outlook on potential combinations with novel drugs currently in development.

Kinetics changes in total cholesterol predict HBeAg seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon-alfa

There is no satisfactory standard for predicting HBeAg seroconversion during Pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFNα) treatment. Studies have shown that IFNα therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients could alter serum lipid profiles. However, there have been no studies on lipid changes that predict the outcome of PegIFNα monotherapy in treated-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. This retrospective study included 130 treated-naive HBeAg-positive CHB patients receiving PegIFNα monotherapy. The relationship between serum lipid changes and HBeAg seroconversion was analysed. The TC-ALT-HBsAg-HBeAg-Genotype-Age (CASEGA) model was established to predict HBeAg seroconversion after PegIFN-α monotherapy. Among 130 patients, 33 achieved HBeAg seroconversion (SR) and 97 did not achieve HBeAg seroconversion (NR). The decrease in serum total cholesterol (TC) in the NR group was significantly higher than in the SR group at Week 24 (-9.59% vs. -0.31%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the change in TC at Week 24 (odds ratio = 1.065, p = 0.009) was an independent predictor of HBeAg seroconversion. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CASEGA model was 0.883. The model score at the maximum Youden index was 90, and the specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.727, 0.794, 0.546 and 0.895, respectively. The HBeAg seroconversion rate at Week 72 in patients with scores >90 was significantly higher than that in patients with scores <90 (54.55% vs. 10.47%, p < 0.001). This study indicated that the change in the TC level at 24 weeks in CHB patients treated with PegIFNα was associated with HBeAg seroconversion. The CASEGA prediction model based on the TC change rate of 24 weeks has good predictive efficiency for HBeAg seroconversion.

Pegylated interferon-α-2b combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and hepatitis B vaccine treatment for naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or seroconversion is an ideal treatment endpoint for patients with chronic hepatitis B but is rarely achievable in  hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients using existing treatment strategies. In this study, the effect of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) alfa-2b plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and hepatitis B vaccine was evaluated. This randomized controlled trial was conducted at nine liver centers in Chinese university hospitals from May 2018 to July 2020. Patients (n = 303) enrolled were randomly administered peg-IFN-α-2b combined with TDF, GM-CSF, and hepatitis B vaccine (experimental group); peg-IFN-α-2b plus TDF (control group 2); or interferon-α-2b alone (control group 1). The primary efficacy endpoint was HBsAg seroconversion at 48 weeks and the secondary endpoint included safety. No differences in baseline HBsAg levels were observed among the groups. The primary endpoint was achieved in three (3.0%), one (1.03%), and one (1.19%) patient in the experimental group, control group 2, and control group 1, respectively. The incidence of HBsAg seroconversion at week 48 was not significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.629). However, the decrease in serum levels of HBsAg at week 48 was significantly higher in the experimental and control group 2 compared with that in control group 1 (p = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). No significant difference between the experimental and control group 2 was observed (p = 0.619). Adverse events were not significantly different among the groups except for the lower incidence of neutropenia in the experimental group. Peg-IFN-α-2b combined with TDF, GM-CSF, and hepatitis B vaccine is not superior to peg-IFN-α-2b combined with TDF in HBeAg-positive naïve patients. Clinical Trials Registration: ChiCTR1800016173.

Effects of pegylated interferon-α based therapies on functional cure and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to pose a serious global health threat and a significant socio-economic burden in many areas of the world. Almost all current clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection recommend that eligible patients pursue the optimal treatment endpoint, which is defined as HBsAg loss with or without anti-HBs seroconversion. This review describes the effects of various regimens containing pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-alpha on functional cure and the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with CHB. Peg-IFN-α monotherapy is a treatment option recommended by local and international clinical practice guidelines to help more CHB patients achieve a sustained off-treatment virological response, which is particularly appropriate for relatively young patients who demand a finite treatment approach. Peg-IFN-α add-on or sequential therapy in patients who have achieved a suppressed viral load after nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy may offer further benefits on HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg decline, although the effects of de novo combination therapy with peg-IFN-α and NAs on long-term outcomes remain unclear. Evaluation of baseline and on-treatment predictors is useful for selecting the patients who are likely to achieve additional benefits. Furthermore, some recent studies have shown that peg-IFN-α-based therapy results in better prevention of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially in high-risk patients.

Elderly age is not a negative predictive factor for virological response to therapy with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C virus patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Age is frequently discussed as negative host factor to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C. However, elderly patients often show advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis as known negative predictive factor. The aim of this study was to assess age as an independent predictive factor during antiviral therapy.

METHODS

Overall, 516 hepatitis C patients were treated with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin, thereof 66 patients ≥60 years. We analysed the impact of host factors (age, gender, fibrosis, haemoglobin, previous hepatitis C treatment) and viral factors (genotype, viral load) on SVR per therapy course by performing a generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression modelling, a matched pair analysis and a classification tree analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, SVR per therapy course was 42.9 and 26.1%, respectively, in young and elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1/4/6. The corresponding figures for HCV genotypes 2/3 were 74.4 and 84%. In the GEE model, age had no significant influence on achieving SVR. In matched pair analysis, SVR was not different in young and elderly patients (54.2 and 55.9% respectively; P = 0.795 in binominal test). In classification tree analysis, age was not a relevant splitting variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is not a significant predictive factor for achieving SVR, when relevant confounders are taken into account. As life expectancy in Western Europe at age 60 is more than 20 years, it is reasonable to treat chronic hepatitis C in selected elderly patients with relevant fibrosis or cirrhosis but without major concomitant diseases, as SVR improves survival and reduces carcinogenesis.

Albinterferon Alfa-2b was not inferior to pegylated interferon-α in a randomized trial of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A phase 3 active-controlled study was conducted to assess the efficacy/safety of albinterferon alfa-2b (albIFN), a novel, long-acting, genetic fusion polypeptide of recombinant human albumin and interferon alfa-2b, in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2/3.

METHODS

In all, 933 patients were randomized to open-label subcutaneous treatment with pegylated interferon-alfa-2a (Peg-IFNalfa-2a) 180 μg/wk, or albIFN 900 or 1200 μg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, each administered with oral ribavirin 800 mg/day. The primary end point of the study was sustained virologic response (SVR) (HCV-RNA level, <15 IU/mL at week 48). During the study, the data monitoring committee recommended dose modification for all patients receiving albIFN 1200 μg to 900 μg, impacting 38% of this treatment arm.

RESULTS

By intention-to-treat analysis, SVR rates were 84.8% (95% confidence interval, 80.4%-88.6%), 79.8% (95% confidence interval, 74.9%-84.1%), and 80.0% (95% confidence interval, 75.1%-84.3%) with Peg-IFNalfa-2a, and albIFN 900 and 1200 μg, respectively. The primary hypothesis of noninferiority of SVR was established for albIFN 900 μg (P = .009) and 1200 μg (P = .006). Independent positive predictors of SVR by multivariate regression analysis were pretreatment HCV-RNA level less than 400,000 IU/mL, age younger than 45 years, body mass index less than 30 kg/m(2), genotype 2, normal γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and increased alanine aminotransferase levels at baseline, fibrosis stage F0-F2, no steatosis, and Asian geographic region (Peg-IFNalfa-2a only). The 3 treatment groups showed similar rates of serious (7%-8%) and severe (13%-16%) adverse events, and discontinuations owing to adverse events (3.6%-5.5%).

CONCLUSION

Albinterferon alfa-2b 900 μg every 2 weeks provides an alternative efficacious treatment option in patients with chronic HCV genotype 2 or 3.