Selegiline in de novo parkinsonian patients: the French selegiline multicenter trial (FSMT)

Monoamine oxidase and neurodegeneration: Mechanisms, inhibitors and natural compounds for therapeutic intervention

Mammalian flavoenzyme Monoamine oxidase (MAO) resides on the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) and it is involved in the metabolism of different monoamine neurotransmitters in brain. During MAO mediated oxidative deamination of relevant substrates, H2O2 is released as a catalytic by-product, thus serving as a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Under normal conditions, MAO mediated ROS is reported to propel the functioning of mitochondrial electron transport chain and phasic dopamine release. However, due to its localization onto mitochondria, sudden elevation in its enzymatic activity could directly impact the form and function of the organelle. For instance, in the case of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who are on l-dopa therapy, the enzyme could be a concurrent source of extensive ROS production in the presence of uncontrolled substrate (dopamine) availability, thus further impacting the health of surviving neurons. It is worth mentioning that the expression of the enzyme in different brain compartments increases with age. Moreover, the involvement of MAO in the progression of neurological disorders such as PD, Alzheimer's disease and depression has been extensively studied in recent times. Although the usage of available synthetic MAO inhibitors has been instrumental in managing these conditions, the associated complications have raised significant concerns lately. Natural products have served as a major source of lead molecules in modern-day drug discovery; however, there is still no FDA-approved MAO inhibitor which is derived from natural sources. In this review, we have provided a comprehensive overview of MAO and how the enzyme system is involved in the pathogenesis of different age-associated neuropathologic conditions. We further discussed the applications and drawbacks of the long-term usage of presently available synthetic MAO inhibitors. Additionally, we have highlighted the prospect and worth of natural product derived molecules in addressing MAO associated complications.

Effects of MAO-B inhibitors on non-motor symptoms and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are common among patients with Parkinson's disease and reduce patients' quality of life (QOL). However, there remain considerable unmet needs for NMS management. Three monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs), selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide, have become commercially available in many countries. Although an increasing number of studies have reported potential beneficial effects of MAO-BIs on QOL and NMS, there has been no consensus. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date systematic review of the QOL and NMS outcomes from the available clinical studies of MAO-BIs. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases in November 2021. We identified 60 publications relevant to this topic. Overall, rasagiline and safinamide had more published evidence on QOL and NMS changes compared with selegiline. This was likely impacted by selegiline being introduced many years prior to the field embarking on the study of NMS. The impact of MAO-BIs on QOL was inconsistent across studies, and this was unlikely to be clinically meaningful. MAO-BIs may potentially improve depression, sleep disturbances, and pain. In contrast, cognitive and olfactory dysfunctions are likely unresponsive to MAO-BIs. Given the paucity of evidence and controlled, long-term studies, the effects of MAO-BIs on fatigue, autonomic dysfunctions, apathy, and ICD remain unclear. The effects of MAO-BIs on static and fluctuating NMS have never been investigated systematically. More high-quality studies will be needed and should enable clinicians to provide personalized medicine based on a non-motor symptom profile.

Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: Past, Present, and Future

Monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors are commonly used for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). MAO-B inhibitor monotherapy has been shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of early-stage PD, while MAO-B inhibitors as adjuvant drugs have been widely applied for the treatment of the advanced stages of the illness. MAO-B inhibitors can effectively improve patients' motor and non-motor symptoms, reduce "OFF" time, and may potentially prevent/delay disease progression. In this review, we discuss the effects of MAO-B inhibitors on motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients, their mechanism of action, and the future development of MAO-B inhibitor therapy.

The effect of monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors on the alleviation of depressive symptoms in Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Depression is a major nonmotor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, few treatments exist for PD depression. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (MAOB-Is) provide symptomatic relief for the motor symptoms of PD and exert antidepressive effects. The present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effects of MAOB-Is on depressive symptoms in patients with PD.

METHODS

Articles on PD-management-related RCTs using one of three MAOB-Is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, that is, selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide, were identified. The primary outcomes were the benefits of MAOB-Is for depressive symptoms. Subgroup analysis included the effects of MAOB-Is on patients in the early versus middle-to-late stages of PD and the effect of short-term versus long-term treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, six studies were included, four of which were conducted on patients with early stage PD. Overall, MAOB-Is significantly reduced the severity of depressive symptoms [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21 to -0.06, p < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis indicated that the positive effect of MAOB-Is was significant in patients with early stage PD (SMD: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.09, p < 0.001), but not in those with middle-to-late-stage PD (SMD: -0.07, 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.03, p = 0.18). The antidepressive effect was significant for short-term treatment, that is, 90-120 days (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.10, p < 0.001), but not long-term treatment, that is, 24 weeks to 18 months (SMD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.01, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

In addition to the treatment of PD motor symptoms, MAOB-Is may help reduce the severity of depressive symptoms in PD, especially in patients with early stage PD. Considering the tolerability and simultaneous benefits of MAOB-Is, further RCTs are warranted to confirm their therapeutic effects in moderate-to-severe PD depression.

Safety overview of FDA-approved medications for the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is among the most common of the neurodegenerative disorders. Treatment is primarily focused on correcting neurotransmitter imbalances. Several classes of medication are available for this purpose.

AREAS COVERED

A Medline search was performed to gather information about the safety of the medications approved for the treatment of the motor symptoms of PD. This was supplemented with additional articles obtained from online sources and information provided by the FDA and the manufacturers. The focus of this review is the side-effect and safety profiles of carbidopa/levodopa, dopamine agonists, selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, anticholinergics and amantadine.

EXPERT OPINION

Though serious side-effects may occur, as a group, the medications used for the treatment of PD motor symptoms tend to produce side-effects that are mild to moderate in nature, and that primarily reflect the focus on dopaminergic therapies. Care plans for Parkinson's patients should be approached based on the needs of the individual as disease presentation, lifestyle, level of disability, concurrent disease states and the presence of non-motor symptoms make each case unique. Patients and caregivers must have realistic expectations about the use of PD medications.

Depression in Parkinson disease--epidemiology, mechanisms and management

Depression occurs in around 35% of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and is often persistent. Symptoms of depression can be evident in individuals at the time of diagnosis and might develop in the premotor stage of the disease. The underlying mechanisms of depression in PD are not known in detail, but changes in brain structure, signaling by neurotransmitters, and levels of inflammatory and neurotrophic factors are all suggested to contribute to its development. Psychosocial factors and pain could also have roles in depression. Changes in dopaminergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in patients with PD might help to explain the incidence of depression in these individuals. Antidepressants that have dual serotonergic and noradrenergic effects are the drugs of choice for treating depression in PD. However, antiparkinsonian drugs might have beneficial effects not only on the motor symptoms of disease, but also on a patient's mood. Deep brain stimulation can worsen depression in some patients, but a preliminary study has suggested that transcranial magnetic stimulation could improve symptoms of depression. This Review describes the frequency and course of depression in patients with PD. The mechanisms that underlie depression in this disease are also discussed, and the management strategies for these patients are highlighted.

Current approaches to the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Enormous progress has been made in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). As a result of advances in experimental therapeutics, many promising therapies for PD are emerging. Levodopa remains the most potent drug for controlling PD symptoms, yet is associated with significant complications such as the "wearing off" effect, levodopa-induced dyskinesias and other motor complications. Catechol-o-methyl-transferase inhibitors, dopamine agonists and nondopaminergic therapy are alternative modalities in the management of PD and may be used concomitantly with levodopa or one another. The neurosurgical treatment, focusing on deep brain stimulation, is reviewed briefly. Although this review has attempted to highlight the most recent advances in the treatment of PD, it is important to note that new treatments are not necessarily better than the established conventional therapy and that the treatment options must be individualized and tailored to the needs of each individual patient.

The effects of antidepressants in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis

This study explored the therapeutic effect of antidepressants in Parkinson's disease (PD) using a meta-analysis. Altogether, 24 placebo-controlled trials qualified for inclusion and revealed that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) had a greater antidepressant effect relative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), Qb(1) = 8.87, p < .01, and the mono-amine-oxidase inhibitor, selegiline, Qb(1) = 7.90, p < .01. Whereas TCAs produced a significant side effect profile (odds ratio = 3.07), adverse events were negligible with SSRIs (odds ratio = 1.83) and selegeline (odds ratio = 1.63). Antidepressants can be beneficial for patients with PD. However, the choice of antidepressants needs to take depressive symptomatologies into account while monitoring side effects.

Depression rating scales in Parkinson's disease: critique and recommendations

Depression is a common comorbid condition in Parkinson's disease (PD) and a major contributor to poor quality of life and disability. However, depression can be difficult to assess in patients with PD due to overlapping symptoms and difficulties in the assessment of depression in cognitively impaired patients. As several rating scales have been used to assess depression in PD (dPD), the Movement Disorder Society commissioned a task force to assess their clinimetric properties and make clinical recommendations regarding their use. A systematic literature review was conducted to explore the use of depression scales in PD and determine which scales should be selected for this review. The scales reviewed were the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Depression Scale (Ham-D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I, Cornell Scale for the Assessment of Depression in Dementia (CSDD), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Seven clinical researchers with clinical and research experience in the assessment of dPD were assigned to review the scales using a structured format. The most appropriate scale is dependent on the clinical or research goal. However, observer-rated scales are preferred if the study or clinical situation permits. For screening purposes, the HAM-D, BDI, HADS, MADRS, and GDS are valid in dPD. The CES-D and CSDD are alternative instruments that need validation in dPD. For measurement of severity of depressive symptoms, the Ham-D, MADRS, BDI, and SDS scales are recommended. Further studies are needed to validate the CSDD, which could be particularly useful for the assessment of severity of dPD in patients with comorbid dementia. To account for overlapping motor and nonmotor symptoms of depression, adjusted instrument cutoff scores may be needed for dPD, and scales to assess severity of motor symptoms (e.g., UPDRS) should also be included to help adjust for confounding factors. The HADS and the GDS include limited motor symptom assessment and may, therefore, be most useful in rating depression severity across a range of PD severity; however, these scales appear insensitive in severe depression. The complex and time-consuming task of developing a new scale to measure depression specifically for patients with PD is currently not warranted.

Intervening in the neuropsychiatric features of Parkinson's disease

Although Parkinson's disease is considered a movement disorder, it has a wide range and high prevalence of affective, psychotic, cognitive, behavioral and sleep-related features. To treat such features, agents including antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics and cognition-enhancing agents are commonly prescribed, although the targeted syndromes are often incompletely understood and controlled studies demonstrating a treatment's efficacy and tolerability in Parkinson's disease patients are often lacking. Nevertheless, the available information does suggest the outlines of management methods, pending expanded research to identify optimal strategies specific to Parkinson's disease.

Management of the behavioral aspects of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is a progressive and debilitating movement disorder that is diagnosed by its motor signs. The behavioral manifestations of Parkinson's disease are prevalent and frequently complicate the course of the disease. These may be due to the illness itself or its treatment and are often more disabling than the motor symptoms. This review focuses on the management of the most common behavioral symptoms of Parkinson's disease, including depression, anxiety, psychosis, dementia, delirium, sleep disorders, fatigue, apathy, emotionalism and compulsive behaviors.

Psychiatric complications in Parkinson disease

Although Parkinson disease (PD) is primarily considered a movement disorder, the high prevalence of psychiatric complications suggests that it is more accurately conceptualized as a neuropsychiatric disease. Affective disorders, cognitive impairment, and psychosis are particularly common in PD and are associated with excess disability, worse quality of life, poorer outcomes, and caregiver distress. Yet, in spite of this and their frequent occurrence, there is incomplete understanding of the epidemiology, phenomenology, risk factors, neuropathophysiology, and optimal treatment strategies for these disorders. Psychiatric complications are typically comorbid, and there is great intra- and inter-individual variability in presentation. The hallmark neuropathophysiological changes that occur in PD plus the association between exposure to dopaminergic medications and certain psychiatric disorders suggest a neurobiological basis for most psychiatric symptoms, although psychological factors are probably involved in the development of affective disorders. Although antidepressants, antipsychotics, and cognition-enhancing agents are commonly prescribed in PD, controlled studies demonstrating efficacy and tolerability of these drugs are virtually nonexistent. Because of the high prevalence and complexity of psychiatric complications in PD, geriatric psychiatrists are in a position to offer valuable consultation and clinical care to this population. This article provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of the most common psychiatric complications in PD.

Antidepressant studies in Parkinson's disease: a review and meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to determine effect sizes for both antidepressant treatment and placebo for depression in Parkinson's disease (PD), and to compare the findings with those reported in elderly depressed patients without PD. Recent reviews have concluded that there is little empiric evidence to support the use of antidepressants in PD; however, available data has not been analyzed to determine the effect size for antidepressant treatment in PD depression. A literature review identified antidepressant studies in PD. Suitable studies were analyzed using meta-analytic techniques, and effect sizes were compared with those from antidepressant studies in elderly patients without PD. Large effect sizes were found for both active treatment and placebo in PD, but there was no difference between the two groups. In contrast, active treatment was superior to placebo in depressed elderly patients without PD. In PD, increasing age and a diagnosis of major depression were associated with better treatment response. Results also suggest that newer antidepressants are well tolerated in PD. Despite the high prevalence of depression and antidepressant use in PD, controlled treatment research has been almost nonexistent. Meta-analysis results suggest a large but nonspecific effect for depression treatment in PD. In addition, PD patients may benefit less from antidepressant treatment, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, than do elderly patients without PD.

Monoamine oxidase B inhibitors for early Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

It has been postulated that monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors alter disease progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinical trials have produced conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effectiveness and safety of long-term use of MAO-B inhibitors in early PD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (last searched 18th August 2004) and EMBASE (last searched 18th August 2004). We also handsearched neurology and movement disorders conference proceedings, checked reference lists of relevant studies and contacted other researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought to include all unconfounded randomized controlled trials that compared a MAO-B inhibitor with control, in the presence or absence of levodopa or dopamine agonists, in patients with early PD and where treatment and follow up lasted at least one year.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed the methodological quality, and extracted the data. A small amount of additional data was provided by the original authors. Random-effects models were used to analyse results, where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials were included (a total of 2422 patients), nine using selegiline, one using lazabemide. The methodological quality was reasonable although concealment of allocation was definitely adequate in only four trials. The mean follow up was for 5.8 years. MAO-B inhibitors were not associated with a significant increase in deaths (odds ratio (OR) 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.44). They provided small benefits over control in impairment (weighted mean difference (WMD) for change in motor UPDRS score was 3.81 points less with MAO-B inhibitors; 95% CI 2.27 to 5.36) and disability (WMD for change in UPDRS ADL score was 1.50 less; 95% CI 0.48 to 2.53) at one year which, although statistically significant, were not clinically significant. There was a marked levodopa-sparing effect with MAO-B inhibitors which was associated with a significant reduction in motor fluctuations (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.94) but not dyskinesia (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.25). The reduction in motor fluctuations was, however, not robust in sensitivity analyses. Although adverse events were generally mild and infrequent, withdrawals due to side-effects were higher (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.20) with MAO-B inhibitors.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

MAO-B inhibitors do not appear to delay disease progression but may have a beneficial effect on motor fluctuations. There was no statistically significant effect on deaths although the confidence interval does not exclude a small increase with MAO-B inhibitors. At present we do not feel these drugs can be recommended for routine use in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease but further randomized controlled trials should be carried out to clarify, in particular, their effect on deaths and motor complications.

Pharmacological studies with endogenous enhancer substances: beta-phenylethylamine, tryptamine, and their synthetic derivatives

The discovery of enhancer regulation in the mesencephalon and the concept that it plays a key role in the operation of innate and acquired drives [Neurochem. Res. 28 (2003) 1187] sets the trace amines (TAs) in their true physiological perspective. The regulation is defined as the existence of enhancer-sensitive neurons in the brain capable of working in a split-second on a high activity level due to endogenous enhancer substances. For the time being, only beta-phenylethylamine (PEA) and tryptamine are the experimentally analyzed examples. (-)-Deprenyl (selegiline), widely used in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease today, and known as the first selective monoamine oxidase (MAO) type-B inhibitor for decades, was identified as a PEA-derived synthetic mesencephalic enhancer substance. An important and convincing confirmation of the enhancer concept was the recent development of a highly specific and potent tryptamine-derived synthetic mesencephalic enhancer substance, (-)-1-(benzofuran-2-yl)-2-propylaminopentane [(-)-BPAP]. This substance, which is specific and hundreds of times more potent than selegiline, is now the best experimental tool to study the enhancer regulation in the mesencephalon and a promising candidate to significantly surpass the therapeutic efficiency of selegiline in depression, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease.

Systematic review of antidepressant therapies in Parkinson's disease☆

Depression is the most common psychiatric disturbance in Parkinson's disease. We conducted a Cochrane systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressant therapies in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Relevant trials were identified from electronic databases, reference lists and queries to antidepressant manufacturers. Three randomised controlled trials examined oral antidepressants in 106 patients with Parkinson's disease. No eligible trials of electroconvulsive or behavioural therapy were found. In the first arm of the crossover trial by Andersen et al. (n=22), nortriptyline treated patients showed a larger improvement than placebo in a unique depression rating scale after 16 weeks although significance levels were not provided. A parallel group trial by Wermuth et al. (n=37) did not show any significant difference between citalopram and placebo in Hamilton score after 52 weeks. Rabey et al. (n=47) performed an open-label trial comparing fluvoxamine with amitriptyline. Similar numbers in each group had a 50% reduction in Hamilton score after 16 months. Major side effects including visual hallucinations and confusion were reported with fluvoxamine and amitriptyline. Insufficient data on the effectiveness and safety of antidepressant therapies in Parkinson's disease are available on which to make recommendations for their use. Large scale randomised controlled trials are urgently required.

Therapies for depression in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Depression is one of the most common neuropsychiatric disturbances in Parkinson's disease. 40% of observed variation in quality of life is due to depression. However, there is little hard evidence of the efficacy and safety of antidepressant therapies in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressant therapies in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Safety refers to both the direct side-effects of the therapy and also the therapy's interactions with the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and with the antiparkinsonian medications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant clinical trials were identified by electronic searches the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (the Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001), MEDLINE(1996-2001), EMBASE (1974-2001), PsychLit (1800's-2001), CINAHL (1982-2001) databases. The reference list of all trial reports and reviews were examined. Queries were sent out to all manufacturers and distributors of antidepressants within the UK requesting information on any relevant clinical trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) examining licensed oral antidepressants, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or behavioural therapy in the treatment of depression in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and assessed independently by three of the authors. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials were found examining oral antidepressant medications in Parkinson's disease in a total of 106 patients. No eligible trials of ECT or behavioural therapy were found. In the first arm of the crossover trial by Andersen 1980 (n=22) patients in the nortriptyline group showed a larger improvement than placebo group in median depression score in a self-made 31-item depression rating scale after 16 weeks of treatment but statistical significance was not calculated. A parallel group trial by Wermuth 1998 (n=37) did not show any statistically significant difference between the citalopram and placebo groups in the Hamilton Depression Scale after 52 weeks of treatment. The third study by Rabey 1996 (n=47) was a randomised open-label trial to compare fluvoxamine versus amitriptyline. Similar numbers of patients in amitriptyline and fluvoxamine groups (60% vs 55%) had a 50% reduction of Hamilton score after 16 months of treatment. However, further assessment of this trial was not possible because only summary results were available from an abstract and attempts to contact the authors failed. Visual hallucinations or confusion had been reported in patients with fluvoxamine and amitriptyline. Otherwise, no other major side effects were found in the other two trials.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient data on the effectiveness and safety of any antidepressants therapies in Parkinson's disease are available on which to make recommendations for their use. Further large scale randomised controlled trials are urgently required in this area.

Rat striatal monoamine oxidase-B inhibition by l-deprenyl and rasagiline: its relationship to 2-phenylethylamine-induced stereotypy and Parkinson's disease

Rats were injected intraperitoneally with varying doses of l-deprenyl (selegiline) followed 2h later by 30 mg kg(-1) 2-phenylethylamine (PEA), administered in the same way, and the stereotypic behavioural response elicited was assessed. l-Deprenyl alone at doses of up to 5 mg kg(-1) caused no significant behavioural response. Administration of PEA without prior l-deprenyl treatment resulted in only a modest increase in stereotypic behaviour and this was not significantly enhanced by the prior administration 1 mg kg(-1) l-deprenyl. When the administered dose of l-deprenyl was increased to 2.5 or 5 mgkg(-1), however, the stereotypic behavioural response to PEA was greatly potentiated and in the latter case persisted for 60 min. A dose of 2.5 mg kg(-1) l-deprenyl and 1 mg kg(-1) rasagiline was shown to result in over 90% inhibition of the monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B from rat liver and striatum, whereas the inhibition of MAO-A was about 60 and 40% in liver and striatum, respectively. The recovery of MAO-B activity in rat striatum and liver following a single i.p. injection of 5 mg kg(-1) l-deprenyl gave first-order rate constants of 1.80 and 7.15 h(-1), respectively, which corresponded to half-lives of 9.23 and 2.33 days. Similar results were obtained with rasagiline. The corresponding indices of stereotypic response to PEA (30 mg kg(-1); i.p.) during recovery from the single dose of l-deprenyl were initially high, but had started to decline by the third day after l-deprenyl treatment and was not significant after day 4. At that time, less than 20% of the striatal monoamine oxidase-B activity had been regained, whereas the recovery of the liver enzyme was about 65%. These data are discussed in terms of the suggested involvement of PEA potentiation in the anti-parkinsonian actions of l-deprenyl and rasagiline and the duration of the 'wash-out' period used in studies on the effects of l-deprenyl on patients with Parkinson's disease. The longer duration of the recovery of brain monoamine oxidase B after its selective inhibition and the corresponding behavioural responses of the animals to PEA at same time points, indicate that PEA may have a major pharmacological role in the mechanism of the antiParkinson action of l-deprenyl and rasagiline. Brain monoamine oxidase B inhibition has previously been shown to significantly increases brain PEA and which is capable of releasing dopamine endogenously or that formed from L-dopa.

Antiaging compounds: (-)deprenyl (selegeline) and (-)1-(benzofuran-2-yl)-2-propylaminopentane, [(-)BPAP], a selective highly potent enhancer of the impulse propagation mediated release of catecholamine and serotonin in the brain

Hundreds of millions of people now die over the age of 80 years primarily due to twentieth century progress in hygiene, chemotherapy, and immunology. With a longer average lifespan, the need to improve quality of life during the latter decades is more compelling. "Aging--The Epidemic of the New Millenium," a recent international conference (Monte Carlo, June 17-18, 2000), showed with peculiar clarity that a safe and efficient drug strategy to slow the age-related decay of brain performance is still missing. This review summarizes the physiologic and pharmacologic arguments in favor of a peculiar lifelong prophylactic medication with reasonable chances to keep in check brain aging and decrease the precipitation of age-related neurological diseases.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. A perspective on their use in the elderly

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are mainly used in psychiatry for the treatment of depressive disorders and in neurology for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. While the classical, nonselective and nonreversible MAOIs, such as phenelzine and tranylcypromine, are characterised by the risk of inducing a hypertensive crisis when dietary tyramine is ingested, the selective monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitor selegiline (deprenyl) and, even more so, the selective and reversible monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) inhibitor moclobemide, are free from this potential interaction. Drug tolerability data for the elderly show that moclobemide is one of the most well tolerated compounds. Selegiline, especially when used in combination with levodopa, can cause anorexia, dry mouth, dyskinesia and, most problematic, orthostatic hypotension. For the traditional MAOIs, phenelzine and tranylcypromine, published data are insufficient to be able to give a conclusive tolerability statement regarding the use of these compounds in elderly people. Although orthostatic hypotension occurs in most patients treated with traditional MAOIs, the incidence in elderly patients with depression does not appear to be greater than that reported with tricyclic antidepressants.

(-)Deprenyl (selegiline), a catecholaminergic activity enhancer (CAE) substance acting in the brain

beta-Phenylethylamine and its long acting derivatives, the amphetamines, are mixed-acting stimulants of the sympathetic system in the brain. They enhance the impulse propagation mediated release of catecholamines (catecholaminergic activity enhancer effect) and displace catecholamines from their stores (catecholamine releasing effect). (-)Deprenyl (selegiline), a close structural relative to (-)methamphetamine, is the first catecholaminergic activity enhancer substance in clinical use devoid of catecholamine releasing property, being therefore free of the 'cheese effect' and of the dependence capacity of the amphetamines. (-)Deprenyl is also a highly potent and selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B. (-)Deprenyl enhances superoxide dismutase and catalase activity in the striatum, protects the nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons against selective neurotoxins (6-hydroxy-dopamine, MPTP, 4-N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine) and prevents characteristic age-related morphological changes in the neurocytes of the substantia nigra. Maintenance of rats on (-)deprenyl during the postdevelopmental phase of their life slows the age-related decline of sexual and learning performances and prolongs life significantly. Patients with early, untreated Parkinson's disease maintained on (-)deprenyl need levodopa significantly later than their placebo-treated peers, and when on levodopa plus (-)deprenyl, they live significantly longer than patients on levodopa alone. In patients with moderately severe impairment from Alzheimer's disease, treatment with (-)deprenyl slows the progression of the disease. It may be supposed that a prophylactic low dose administration of a safe catecholaminergic activity enhancer substance during the postdevelopmental phase of life will slow the age-related decline of behavioral performances, delay natural death and decrease susceptibility to Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.

Desmethylselegiline, a metabolite of selegiline, is an irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B in humans

Selegiline, an irreversible and selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B), is metabolized into desmethylselegiline, levomethamphetamine, and levoamphetamine. In animal experiments, desmethylselegiline also has been shown to be an irreversible inhibitor of MAO-B. This study investigated the inhibitory potential of MAO-B and the pharmacokinetics of desmethylselegiline in humans. A double-blind, crossover trial was performed to compare the effects of a single dose (10 mg) of selegiline or desmethylselegiline on MAO-B platelet activity. The urinary excretion of phenylethylamine, which is considered to be a parameter of MAO-B inhibition, also was measured. The concentrations of selegiline, desmethylselegiline, and their metabolites were measured in plasma after administration of the two compounds. Ten healthy volunteers participated in the study. There was a clear inhibition of platelet MAO-B by both compounds. Desmethylselegiline caused a 63.7 +/- 12.7% inhibition of platelet MAO-B compared with 96.4 +/- 3.9% caused by selegiline. The maximal inhibition by desmethylselegiline was reached significantly later after desmethylselegiline (time to reach maximal inhibition [tmax], 27 +/- 20 hours) than after selegiline administration (tmax, 1.4 +/- 1.4 hours). The platelet MAO-B activity returned to baseline levels within 2 weeks, thus reflecting the irreversible nature of the inhibition by both compounds. The cumulative 48-hour excretion of phenylethylamine was 33% lower after desmethylselegiline than after selegiline administration. All three major metabolites of selegiline could be detected in plasma after selegiline administration. Levoamphetamine was the only metabolite of desmethylselegiline. The area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) of desmethylselegiline was 33 times higher than that of selegiline, suggesting a better bioavailability of desmethylselegiline. Desmethylselegiline is an orally active, irreversible inhibitor of MAO-B and could possibly be used to treat Parkinson's disease in the same way as selegiline.

The need for levodopa as an end point of Parkinson's disease progression in a clinical trial of selegiline and alpha-tocopherol. Parkinson Study Group

Progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) can be detected through changes in clinical ratings or disability assessments. A clinical trial, Deprenyl and Alpha-Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy of Parkinsonism (DATATOP), used a novel study end point: increase in parkinsonian disability to the extent that investigators determined the need for treatment with levodopa. We analyzed DATATOP results to learn if this operationally defined end point could be reproduced from elements of the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) and other conventional clinical scales. Our analysis involved UPDRS, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (S-E ADL), and Hoehn and Yahr (H-Y) scores when DATATOP subjects reached the study end point. Various UPDRS components were examined, including subscores measuring severity of impaired ADL, bradykinesia, postural instability and gait difficulty, tremor, and rigidity. Data from subjects reaching the end point were compared with assessments of those DATATOP subjects who did not, matched for the same duration of enrollment. All measures showed subjects who reached the end point had significantly greater mean impairment than did controls, although the two groups had substantial overlap. Multivariate analysis by using conditional logistic regression suggested that the end point was determined more by functional (S-E ADL and the UPDRS ADL scores) than by clinical examination criteria. The method of classification and regression trees suggested a simple decision tree splitting, respectively, on S-E ADL, UPDRS ADL, H-Y score, and UPDRS ADL again, with an estimated overall misclassification probability of 18%. We conclude that the DATATOP end point cannot be fully reproduced from the traditional clinical measures, although it can give results that are consistent with these scales in a well-designed clinical trial.

Effect of lazabemide on the progression of disability in early Parkinson's disease. The Parkinson Study Group

Lazabemide (Ro 19-6327) is a relatively short-acting, reversible, and selective type B monoamine oxidase inhibitor that is not metabolized to amphetamines or other active compounds. We previously found lazabemide to be safe and well tolerated at dosages of up to 400 mg/day during a 6-week study of 201 patients with early untreated Parkinson's disease (PD). We now assess whether or not lazabemide influences the progression of disability in untreated PD. Patients (N = 321) were assigned by randomization to one of five treatment groups (placebo, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg/day) and followed systematically for up to 1 year. The risk of reaching the primary end point (the onset of disability sufficient to require levodopa therapy) was reduced by 51% for the patients who received lazabemide compared with placebo-treated subjects. This effect was consistent among all dosages. The frequency of adverse experiences did not differ among the treatment groups. At dosages ranging from 25 to 200 mg/day, lazabemide was well tolerated and delayed the need for levodopa in early, otherwise untreated PD. The magnitude and pattern of benefits were similar to those observed after 1 year of deprenyl (selegiline) treatment in the DATATOP clinical trial.

The management of treatment-resistant depression in the medically ill

There are a few well-designed studies to systematically assess treatment-resistant depression in the medically ill patient. Psychiatrists, however, do have extensive clinical experience in treating depression in the medical patient. This experience can be useful in helping to determine treatment resistance and in selecting consequent treatment choices. A decision tree is offered in Table 1 to clarify the questions the clinician must answer. The first step is to evaluate the role of the medical illness and to decide whether or not treating that effectively will also clear the depression. Physicians may find it helpful to use a decision tree in initiating treatment of patients with depression and physical illness. Once it has been clarified that the diagnosis of depression is a correct one and that an antidepressant medication is in order, consideration of safety, side effects, and other current prescriptions used by the patient must occur. Drug-drug interactions as well as changes in the clearance of medications are critical to the effectiveness of the choice and tolerability for the patient. An antidepressant agent needs to be given for an adequate time with optimization of dosing. Augmenting a medication to increase its therapeutic action could be tried if one agent alone is not effective. An alternative approach is that the second drug selected might affect different neurotransmitters, and the combination of mechanisms would result in resolution of symptoms. Adding psychotherapy, especially when social supports are lacking, can be particularly helpful. ECT is an important consideration for severe depression when suicidal concerns are imminent or the patient has not responded to pharmacotherapy trials. While we await further studies of treatment-resistant depression in large enough numbers of patients with particular illnesses, we can use these guidelines to direct our decisions to switch or augment our initial choices to provide the safest, most effective care possible.

Impact of deprenyl and tocopherol treatment on Parkinson's disease in DATATOP subjects not requiring levodopa. Parkinson Study Group

In the controlled trial Deprenyl and Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy of Parkinsonism (DATATOP), 310 of the 800 enrolled subjects did not reach the primary end point of disability requiring levodopa therapy during 21 +/- 4 (mean +/- SD) months of observation or need early initiation of deprenyl (selegiline) during a 2-month withdrawal of experimental treatments. While maintaining the blindness of their original deprenyl and tocopherol treatment assignments, these 310 subjects were administered deprenyl 10 mg/day (open label) and were monitored systematically at 1- to 3-month intervals for up to 18 months (12 +/- 5 mo). During this extended trial, the 189 subjects who had been assigned originally to active deprenyl tended to reach the end point of disability faster than the 121 subjects who had not been assigned originally to deprenyl (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.98, 2.09; p = 0.065). However, the differential rates of reaching the end point may have been due in part to the more severe baseline impairment of deprenyl-assigned subjects, who benefited originally from deprenyl but who were more likely to require levodopa during this extended period of observation. Prior treatment with deprenyl did not lead to superior survival with respect to the end point of disability requiring levodopa, suggesting that the initial advantages of deprenyl were not sustained.

Responses of forebrain neurons to the MAO-B blocker L-deprenyl

Despite the large amount of neuropharmacological data concerning catecholamine (CA) mechanisms of the mammalian brain, little is known yet about the effects of MAO-inhibitors on single neurons. The present series of experiments aim to elucidate these specific neurochemical attributes of forebrain cells. Single neuron activity was recorded by means of multi-barreled microelectrodes in the caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, and amygdala of both anesthetized rats and anesthetized or alert monkeys during microelectrophoretic application of the MAO-B blocker L-deprenyl (DEPR). CAs (dopamine and noradrenaline), glutamate, GABA, and acetylcholine were also applied. Nearly the half (46%) of all forebrain neurons tested responded, exclusively with inhibition, to DEPR, and the CA-sensitive cells were especially responsive to the MAO-B inhibitor. The time course of DEPR-induced neuronal suppression was short. In some cases, amphetamine (AMPH) and clorgyline (CLOR) were also applied microelectrophoretically. AMPH elicited similar activity changes to those seen after DEPR administrations, whereas CLOR applications were less effective. Our results provide evidence that DEPR can effectively modulate the activity of CA-sensitive neurons in the three different forebrain regions of two different species. On the basis of this data, the possible neurochemical mechanisms of DEPR action are discussed.

Aliphatic propargylamines, a new series of potent selective, irreversible non-amphetamine-like MAO-B inhibitors. Their structures, function and pharmacological implications

1-Deprenyl, a selective irreversible MAO-B inhibitor, has been shown to prolong the onset of disability in Parkinson's patients and to improve cognitive behavior in Alzheimer's disease. It has been claimed that 1-deprenyl exhibits neuroprotective and neurorescue effects in several animal models. The precise mechanism of these effects is unknown. It is yet to be established whether or not the effects are unique to 1-deprenyl; a drug which possesses, in addition to inhibition of MAO-B activity, an amphetamine moiety. Based on the fact that several N-methylpropargylamine derivatives have been shown to be MAO inhibitors and that aliphatic amines are typical MAO-B substrates with a high affinity for the enzyme, we have synthesized a series of aliphatic propargylamines which have turned out to be highly potent, selective and irreversible MAO-B inhibitors, structurally unrelated to amphetamine. The potency of these inhibitors is related to their chain length and the substitution of a hydrogen on the terminal carbon of the aliphatic chain. MAO-I activity, as assessed in vitro, increased as the aliphatic carbon chain length increased; substitution of the hydrogen at the aliphatic chain terminal by hydroxyl, carboxyl or carboethoxyl groups or replacement of the methyl group on the nitrogen atom by an ethyl group considerably reduced their inhibitory activity. Stereospecific effects were observed with the R-(-)-enantiomer being 20-fold more active than the S-(+)-enantiomer. Inhibitors with relatively short carbon chain lengths (i.e. four to six carbons) were found to be more potent at inhibiting brain MAO-B activity in vivo especially after oral administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Neurochemical, neuroprotective and neurorescue effects of aliphatic N-methylpropargylamines; new MAO-B inhibitors without amphetamine-like properties

A series of aliphatic N-methylpropargylamine MAO-B inhibitors have been synthesized and their structural and functional relationships have been investigated. 2-Hexyl-N-methylpropargylamine (2-HxMP), for example, has been found to be a highly potent, irreversible, selective, MAO-B inhibitor both in vitro and in vivo. The R-(-)-enantiomers are much more active than the S-(+)-enantiomers at inhibiting MAO-B activity. Some of these compounds protect mouse nigrostriatal dopamine neurons against the neurotoxin MPTP and the mouse hippocampal noradrenergic system against the neurotoxin N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP-4). They rescue hippocampal neurons after damage induced by ischemia and kainic acid treatment, as well as motoneurons in young mice following facial nerve axotomy. Such rescue effects are, interestingly, unrelated to inhibition of MAO-B activity. Some of the aliphatic propargylamines enhance the survival of neuroblastoma cells co-cultured with astrocytes following serum depletion. They stimulate the expression of AADC mRNA and inhibit GFAP mRNA expression. They do not possess amphetamine-like properties and exhibit no effect on noradrenaline or dopamine uptake nor do they increase hypertensive effects in the tyramine pressor test. Unlike R(-)-deprenyl, 2-HxMP does not potentiate dopamine toxicity in vitro. These new MAO-B inhibitors may possess significant chemotherapeutic implications for certain psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders.

Pharmacological and clinical implications of MAO-B inhibitors

Although the involvement of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) in physiological function is not yet well understood, its inhibitors have been shown to be quite useful in the treatment of various neuropsychiatric disorders. Platelet MAO-B activity has been found to be reduced in several psychiatric disorders, related to substance abuse and associated with different personalities. 1-Deprenyl (selegiline), an archetypical MAO-B inhibitor, alone does not seem to exert an antidepressive effect, however, it may become useful when administered in combination with amine neurotransmitter precursors. MAO-B inhibitors are useful adjunct drugs to 1-DOPA in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. Interestingly, 1-deprenyl alone can slow down the progress of otherwise disabled syndromes of Parkinson's disease. It has been proposed that 1-deprenyl may play a role in neuroprotection and neurorescue. MAO-B inhibitors can selectively and dramatically increase the level of beta-phenylethylamine, which has been shown to potentiate dopamine and noradrenaline function in the central nervous system. Several new types of highly selective, reversible and irreversible MAO-B inhibitors have recently been developed. The mechanism(s) of neuroprotective and rescue actions of 1-deprenyl and other MAO-B inhibitors will help to shed some light on our understanding of the neurodegenerative process.

Effects of tocopherol and deprenyl on the progression of disability in early Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

In 1987 we began a multicenter controlled clinical trial of deprenyl (a monoamine oxidase inhibitor) and tocopherol (a component of vitamin E that traps free radicals) in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease. We randomly assigned 800 patients to one of four treatments: placebo, active tocopherol and deprenyl placebo, active deprenyl and tocopherol placebo, or both active drugs. The primary end point was the onset of disability prompting the clinical decision to begin administering levodopa. An interim analysis showed that deprenyl was beneficial (N Engl J Med 1989;321:1364-71). We report the results of tocopherol treatment after a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 14 +/- 6 months, as well as the follow-up results for deprenyl.

RESULTS

There was no beneficial effect of tocopherol or any interaction between tocopherol and deprenyl. The beneficial effects of deprenyl, which occurred largely during the first 12 months of treatment, remained strong and significantly delayed the onset of disability requiring levodopa therapy (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.62; P < 0.001). The difference in the estimated median time to the end point was about nine months. The ratings for Parkinson's disease improved during the first three months of deprenyl treatment; the motor performance of deprenyl-treated patients worsened after the treatments were withdrawn.

CONCLUSIONS

Deprenyl (10 mg per day) but not tocopherol (2000 IU per day) delays the onset of disability associated with early, otherwise untreated Parkinson's disease. The action of deprenyl that accounts for its beneficial effects remains unclear.

Symptomatic effect of selegiline in de novo Parkinsonian patients. The French Selegiline Multicenter Trial

The French Selegiline Multicenter Trial was carried out in 1990 to investigate whether the disability of de novo patients with parkinsonism could be improved during the first 3 months by monotherapy with selegiline (10 mg/day). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted over 3 months with 93 patients from 13 centers. Symptomatology was assessed on various disease rating scales, including Hoehn and Yahr, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale, and Schwab and England scores, as well as self-assessment. Biological and clinical parameters were measured for tolerability, and efficacy was investigated with special reference to the point at which therapy with L-dopa had to be started. Selegiline was significantly superior to placebo on the various motor rating scores, and depressive scores were significantly improved at the end of 3 months. Adverse effects were rare and minor. Therefore, selegiline could be the therapy of choice for the treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients.