Genetic screening of Scandinavian families with febrile seizures and epilepsy or GEFS+

Mosaic SCN1A mutations in familial partial epilepsy with antecedent febrile seizures

SCN1A is the most relevant epilepsy gene. Mutations of SCN1A generate phenotypes ranging from the extremely severe form of Dravet syndrome (DS) to a mild form of generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). Mosaic SCN1A mutations have been identified in rare familial DS. It is suspected that mosaic mutations of SCN1A may cause other types of familial epilepsies with febrile seizures (FS), which are more common clinically. Thus, we screened SCN1A mutations in 13 families with partial epilepsy with antecedent febrile seizures (PEFS+) using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and sequencing. The level of mosaicism was further quantified by pyrosequencing. Two missense SCN1A mutations with mosaic origin were identified in two unrelated families, accounting for 15.4% (2/13) of the PEFS+ families tested. One of the mosaic carriers with ~25.0% mutation of c.5768A>G/p.Q1923R had experienced simple FS; another with ~12.5% mutation of c.4847T>C/p.I1616T was asymptomatic. Their heterozygous children had PEFS+. Recurrent transmission occurred in both families, as noted in most of the families with germline mosaicism reported previously. The two mosaic mutations identified in this study are less destructive missense, compared with the more destructive truncating and splice-site mutations identified in the majority of previous studies. This is the first report of mosaic SCN1A mutations in families with probands that do not exhibit DS, but manifest only a milder phenotype. Therefore, such families with mild cases should be approached with caution in genetic counseling and the possibility of mosaicism origin associated with high recurrence risk should be excluded.

Mutation screening of three Chinese families with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus

Genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) is a familial autosomal dominant condition characterized by genetic heterogeneity. Five genes for GEFS+ identified in large families account for only a small proportion of families. Mutation in the majority of families with GEFS+ has not identified yet. The aim of our study is to search for the gene responsible for GEFS+ in three Chinese families by linkage analyses and a sequencing approach and to investigate the importance of coding and noncoding regions variations of four known GEFS+ genes (SCN1A, SCN1B, GABRG2 and SCN2A) in Chinese families. Results showed that a 6-cM candidate interval at 5q33-34 with a maximum LOD scores of 2.043 was identified in families B. Sequencing candidate gene GABRG2 and GABRA1 in this region did not identify a causative mutation. Moreover, no mutation was found in coding and noncoding regions of the four genes in three Chinese families. Besides excluding coding regions of four known GEFS+ genes, we also excluded the possibility of a mutation in the promoter, exon-intron boundaries, 5' untranslated regions (5' UTRs), and 3' UTRs of four known GEFS+ genes in three Chinese families. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the heterogeneity of the etiologies of GEFS+. There are as yet undiscovered mechanisms underlying GEFS+.

Blinders, phenotype, and fashionable genetic analysis: a critical examination of the current state of epilepsy genetic studies

Although it is accepted that idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is strongly, if not exclusively, influenced by genetic factors, there is little consensus on what those genetic influences may be, except for one point of agreement: epilepsy is a "channelopathy." This point of agreement has continued despite the failure of studies investigating channel genes to demonstrate the primacy of their influence on IGE expression. The belief is sufficiently entrenched that the more important issues involving phenotype definition, data collection, methods of analysis, and the interpretation of results have become subordinate to it. The goal of this article is to spark discussion of where the study of epilepsy genetics has been and where it is going, suggesting we may never get there if we continue on the current road. We use the long history of psychiatric genetic studies as a mirror and starting point to illustrate that only when we expand our outlook on how to study the genetics of the epilepsies, consider other mechanisms that could lead to epilepsy susceptibility, and, especially, focus on the critical problem of phenotype definition, will the major influences on common epilepsy begin to be understood.