Implantation of single-piece foldable acrylic IOLs in small children in the Ukraine

[Timing of congenital cataract surgery : Amblyopia versus aphakic glaucoma]

A congenital cataract is a rare disorder, which is associated with a high risk of amblyopia. Ophthalmologists are faced with many diagnostic and surgical challenges in the management of this disease. Older children can undergo primary treatment with an intraocular lens, whereas children younger than 12 months of age usually initially remain aphakic. The most frequent long-term complication of aphakic eyes following congenital cataract surgery in connection with posterior capsulorrhexis and anterior vitrectomy is aphakic glaucoma, which in individual cases can lead to substantial impairment of vision. Many factors have been reported to increase the risk of postoperative glaucoma, including microphthalmos, fetal nuclear cataract, conspicuous family history and associated ocular malformations, such as persistent fetal vasculature (PFV). Cataract surgery during early infancy is well-established to be the most important factor for the formation of postoperative aphakic glaucoma. In individual treatment planning it has to be considered that although younger age at the time of cataract removal can provide better prerequisites for prophylaxis of amblyopia, it also confers a higher risk of development of aphakic glaucoma. Children undergoing congenital cataract surgery have to be regularly monitored given the lifelong risk for postoperative complications, such as aphakic glaucoma.

Visual Axis Opacity after Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children in the First 2 Years of Life: Findings from the IoLunder2 Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Appropriate correction of aphakia is key to good outcomes. There may be clinical settings where and populations in whom accessing or managing aphakic contact lenses is challenging. Strategies to target the increased risk of visual axis opacity (VAO) after primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in infancy are necessary. We describe the predictors of VAO after primary IOL implantation for unilateral or bilateral congenital or infantile cataract in children younger than 2 years of age.

DESIGN

Population-based (United Kingdom and Ireland), prospective, inception cohort study undertaken through a national clinical network.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 105 children (57 with bilateral cataract, 48 with unilateral cataract, total 162 eyes) undergoing primary IOL implantation in the first 2 years of life between January 2009 and December 2010.

METHODS

Observational longitudinal study with multilevel, multivariable modeling to investigate associations between outcome of interest and child- and treatment-specific factors, including age, axial length, socioeconomic status, IOL model, and postoperative steroid use.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative proliferative or inflammatory visual axis opacity (VAO) requiring surgical correction.

RESULTS

Visual axis opacity occurred in 67 eyes (45%), typically within the first postoperative year. Use of a 3-piece IOL model (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.99, P = 0.03) and increasing age at surgery (OR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.95-0.99, P = 0.02) were each independently protective against the development of proliferative VAO. Inflammatory VAO was independently associated with socioeconomic deprivation (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.46-19.89; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Visual axis opacification is common after IOL implantation in early childhood. The findings of this prospective cohort study suggest that the use of 3-piece IOL models may reduce the risk of pseudophakic VAO in children younger than 2 years of age.

A survey of the surgical treatment of congenital and developmental cataracts in Japan

PURPOSE

To understand the current practice pattern for the surgical treatment of congenital/developmental cataracts in Japan.

METHODS

A mail questionnaire was sent to facilities engaged in the surgical treatment of congenital cataracts in Japan.

RESULTS

Thirty-four facilities reported their preferred methods for the surgical treatment of congenital cataracts, including data from 809 eyes of 508 patients who had undergone surgery. More than 85% of the respondents answered that they would consider surgery even if the visual prognosis was not promising because of possible form-deprivation amblyopia. The most commonly performed surgical maneuvers were scleral tunnel incision (88.4%), 3.0-mm or smaller incision (78.8%), manual anterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (90.2% success rate), posterior capsulotomy (92.5% for patients aged ≤6 years), anterior vitrectomy by the limbal approach (85.9% for patients aged ≤6 years), and wound closure with sutures (93.2%). Posterior capsulotomy and vitrectomy were not usually performed in patients aged >6 years. Implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) was mostly indicated in patients aged 2 years or older. Implantation of an acrylic foldable IOL (76.6%) into the capsular bag (89.7%) was the most common practice among the surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Small incision surgery with implantation of an acrylic foldable IOL into the capsular bag combined with posterior capsulotomy was the preferred surgical treatment of choice for congenital/developmental cataracts.

[Aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma following pediatric cataract surgery]

Modern surgical techniques allow congenital cataract surgery to be performed much more successfully. The development of a secondary glaucoma is the most dreaded postoperative complication (one third of all pediatric secondary glaucomas). Due to the limited value of the available literature, data on prevalence are unreliable. A 10-year postoperative incidence of 10-25% is given in the literature for developing secondary glaucoma and the frequency increases with the duration of follow-up. A major risk factor seems to be the age at the time of surgery. The younger the patient is at the time of surgery the higher the risk of secondary glaucoma. A microcornea seems to be another risk factor in multivariate analysis. The following postoperative changes might be involved in the pathogenesis: peripheral anterior synechia, high iris insertion and membranous material over the trabecular meshwork. Additionally postoperative inflammation, reaction to lens epithelial cells, perioperative barotrauma and loss of anterior segment architecture might also be responsible. In order to evaluate the optimal age window for congenital cataract surgery and risk factors for the development of secondary glaucoma, a prospective longitudinal study is mandatory.

Safety of irrigation with 5-fluorouracil in a sealed-capsule irrigation device in the rabbit eye

PURPOSE

To study the safety of irrigation with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the Perfect Capsule sealed-capsule irrigation device (Milvella, Ltd., Epping, Australia).

SETTING

St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

METHODS

Thirty 8-week-old rabbits were divided into 4 groups. Clear lens extraction was performed and the Perfect Capsule was applied in 1 eye in Groups 1, 2 and 3. The sealed system was flushed with balanced salt solution (BSS) in Group 1, 5-FU 50 mg/mL in Group 2, and 5-FU followed by BSS in Group 3. In Group 4, the Perfect Capsule was not applied; instead, 0.2 mL of 5-FU was instilled in the capsule and left there for 30 seconds. An endothelial cell count and pachymetry were performed preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively. At 24 or 48 hours (half of each group at each time point), the rabbits were killed and the retina and trabecular meshwork histopathologically examined. The endothelial cell count and pachymetry were compared between the Perfect Capsule eye and the control eye in Group 1.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups in endothelial cell count (P = .96) or pachymetry (P = .32). Histologic evaluation showed no damage from the 5-FU. The comparison between eyes in Group 1 showed that the use of the Perfect Capsule did not cause more endothelial cell loss (P = .86) or increase pachymetry more (P = .28) than in the control eye.

CONCLUSION

Irrigation with 5-FU 50 mg/mL in the sealed-capsule irrigation device was safe and caused no apparent damage to the adjacent intraocular tissues.