Long-term stability of clinical attachment following guided tissue regeneration and conventional therapy

Prognostic value of a composite outcome measure for periodontal stability following periodontal regenerative treatment: A retrospective analysis at 4 years

BACKGROUND

Recently, a composite outcome measure (COM) was proposed to describe the short-term results of periodontal regenerative treatment. The present retrospective study aimed at evaluating the prognostic value of COM on clinical attachment level (CAL) change over a 4-year period of supportive periodontal care (SPC).

METHODS

Seventy-four intraosseous defects in 59 patients were evaluated at 6 months and 4 years following regenerative treatment. Based on 6-month CAL change and probing depth (PD), defects were classified as: COM1 (CAL gain ≥3 mm, PD ≤4 mm); COM2 (CAL gain <3 mm, PD ≤4 mm); COM3 (CAL gain ≥3 mm, PD >4 mm); or COM4 (CAL gain <3 mm, PD >4 mm). COM groups were compared for "stability" (i.e., CAL gain, no change in CAL or CAL loss <1 mm) at 4 years. Also, groups were compared for mean change in PD and CAL, need for surgical retreatment, and tooth survival.

RESULTS

At 4 years, the proportion of stable defects in COM1, COM2, COM3, and COM4 group was 69.2%, 75%, 50%, and 28.6%, respectively, with a substantially higher probability for a defect to show stability for COM1, COM2, and COM3 compared with COM4 (odds ratio 4.6, 9.1, and 2.4, respectively). Although higher prevalence of surgical reinterventions and lower tooth survival were observed in COM4, no significant differences were detected among COM groups.

CONCLUSIONS

COM may be of value in predicting CAL change at sites undergoing SPC following periodontal regenerative surgery. Studies on larger cohorts, however, are needed to substantiate the present findings.

Complications and treatment errors related to regenerative periodontal surgery

Regenerative periodontal surgical procedures are an important component in the treatment of advanced periodontitis. They aim to improve the long-term prognosis of teeth that are periodontally compromised by the presence of intrabony and/or furcation defects, resulting biologically in formation of root cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone and evidenced clinically by reduction of deep pockets to maintainable probing depths and/or improvements of vertical and horizontal furcation depth. Over the last 25 years, substantial clinical evidence has been accumulated to support the value of regenerative procedures in periodontally compromised dentitions. However, treatment success requires close attention to certain factors on the level of the patient, the tooth/defect, and the operator. Ignoring these factors in case selection, treatment planning, and treatment execution will increase the risk of complications that may jeopardize clinical success and may even be considered as treatment errors. Based on the currently available evidence from clinical practice guidelines, treatment algorithms, and on expert opinion, the present article provides an overview on the main factors, which influence the outcomes of regenerative periodontal surgery and gives recommendations on how to prevent complications and treatment errors.

Differences in periodontal parameters between SPT patients who regularly and irregularly visited the dental clinic analyzed at tooth level: a 14-year retrospective cohort study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periodontal status of patients who routinely did SPT, when compared to patients that did not SPT. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a general dental office from 2001 to 2019. Patients aged 18 to 81 years who visited the dental office over a 10-year period were assigned into two groups: an SPT group, which included patients who continually visited the dental office for SPT one or more times every year, and an irregular group, consisting of patients who did not visit the dental office at least once a year. A total of 7307 teeth (SPT group) and 4659 teeth (irregular group) were evaluated, and the periodontal conditions were compared between the first and latest visits. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the results. The mean follow-up time was 13.74 years. The risk factors for improvements in probing pocket depth included age, sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus, molar tooth, and irregular SPT group (p < 0.001), and that for a positive bleeding on probing site was the irregular group (odds ratio 2.94; 95% confidence interval 2.63-3.29). This study showed that lack of routine in attending the SPT program significantly decreased the periodontal parameters, thus highlighting the importance of continuing with the program to maintain the periodontal health.

Modified minimally invasive surgical technique in human intrabony defects with or without regenerative materials-10-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial: Tooth retention, periodontitis recurrence, and costs

AIM

The modified minimally invasive surgical technique (M-MIST) optimizes wound stability in the treatment of intrabony defects. Short-term observations show similar results as with flap alone or adjunctive regenerative materials. This study aims to compare the stability of the long-term outcomes, complication-free survival, and costs of the three treatment options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five intrabony defects in 45 patients were randomized to M-MIST alone (N = 15), combined with enamel matrix derivative (M-MIST + EMD, N = 15), or EMD plus bone-mineral-derived xenograph (M-MIST + EMD + BMDX, N = 15). Supportive periodontal care (SPC) and necessary re-treatment were provided for 10 years.

RESULTS

Three subjects were lost to follow-up. Clinical attachment level differences between 1 and 10 years were -0.1 ± 0.7 mm for M-MIST, -0.1 ± 0.8 mm for M-MIST + EMD, and -0.3 ± 0.6 mm for M-MIST + EMD + BMDX (p > .05 for within- and between-group differences). Four episodes of recurrence occurred in the M-MIST group, four in the M-MIST + EMD group, and five in the M-MIST + EMD + BMDX group. No significant differences in complication-free survival were observed between the three groups (p = .47). Complication-free survival was 7.46 years (95% confidence interval: 7.05-7.87) for the whole population. The M-MIST + EMD + BMDX group lost one treated tooth. Data indicated no significant inter-group difference of the total cost of recurrence over 10 years. When the baseline cost of treatment was considered, the total cost was lower for M-MIST alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Teeth with deep pockets associated with intrabony defects can be successfully maintained over the long term with either M-MIST alone or by adding a regenerative material in the context of a careful SPC programme. M-MIST alone provided similar short- and long-term benefits as regeneration, at a lower cost. These findings need to be confirmed in larger, independent studies.

Flapless application of enamel matrix derivative in non-surgical periodontal treatment: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of the flapless application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in combination with non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT) when compared to non-surgical periodontal treatment alone in adult patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Library up to March 2021 complemented by a manual search. Human longitudinal studies of >5 participants and at least 3 months follow-up were eligible for inclusion in the review. Clinical outcomes were extracted and pooled. Meta-analysis of the included studies was not possible due to methodological differences.

RESULTS

A total of 1199 publications were identified and reviewed for eligibility. Nine of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were randomized clinical trials. The clinical findings of the majority of the included studies demonstrated that the adjunctive use of EMD with NSPT could lead to significantly improved treatment outcomes including higher PPD reduction, more CAL gain, more robust BOP reduction, higher number of sites with PPD < 5 mm and more frequent pocket closure which reduces the need for further periodontal surgical treatment. Limited biological, microbiological and histological findings were reported. Minimal adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

The flapless application of EMD during NSPT leads to an improved clinical outcome in regards to CAL gain and PPD reduction when compared to conventional treatment alone. The potential effect on the biological and microbiological outcome is unclear.

Ten-Year Stability of Clinical Attachment after Regenerative Treatment of Infrabony Defects and Controls

Background: A similar long-term stable clinical attachment level (CAL) of infrabony defects (IBDs) after regenerative treatment compared to control teeth would indicate a high level of stability resulting from the regenerative approach. Methods: Patients with a regeneratively treated IBD were screened 120 ± 12 months postoperatively for eligibility for study participation, and were included if complete baseline and 12-month examinations (plaque (PlI), periodontal probing depth (PPD), CAL) were available and a respective control tooth could be identified. Re-examination included clinical examination (PPD, CAL, PlI/GI, bleeding on probing, plaque control record, gingival bleeding index). Results: A total of 27 patients (16 females; age (median; lower/upper quartile): 57.0; 44.0/60.0 years; 6 smokers) contributed 27 IBDs (test), for each of which a control tooth was identified. Five test teeth (18.5%) were lost between 12 and 120 months. The remaining 22 test teeth revealed a significant CAL gain after 1 (2.5 mm; 1.0/4.0 mm, p < 0.0001) and 10 (2.5 mm; 0.5/3.5 mm, p < 0.0001) years, whereas control teeth were stable (1 year: 0.0 mm; 0.0/1.0 mm, p = 0.396; 10 years: 0.0 mm; −1.0/1.5 mm, p = 0.215). The study did not detect any significant CAL change between 1 and 10 years for test (−0.5 mm; −1.0/0.5 mm, p = 0.414) and control teeth (0.0 mm; −1.0/1.0 mm, p = 0.739). In 15 patients, test and control teeth revealed stable CAL values between 12 and 120 months. Conclusion: Regenerative treatment of IBDs exhibited stability comparable to non-surgically treated, periodontally reduced sites over a 10-year period.

The impact of a "successfully treated stable periodontitis patient status" on patient-related outcome parameters during long-term supportive periodontal care

AIM

To assess the importance of achieving a successfully treated stable periodontitis patient status (PPS) during long-term supportive periodontal care (SPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 100 periodontitis patients, who continued for ≥7.5 years after active periodontal treatment with SPC and were judged as overall adherent. The effect of various predictors on three patient-related outcome parameters was assessed: (1) number of diseased teeth at last SPC, (2) number of teeth lost due to periodontitis, and (3) number of teeth lost due to any reason.

RESULTS

One-fifth of the patients were classified as stable after active periodontal treatment. After a mean follow-up of 10.77 years, 24 patients lost 38 teeth due to periodontitis. An unstable PPS and a higher number of diseased teeth per patient at first SPC, and inadequate oral hygiene levels over time, significantly increased the risk for a higher number of diseased teeth per patient at last SPC and for more lost teeth due to periodontitis. However, high adherence to SPC appeared to mitigate the negative effect of an unstable PPS, especially regarding tooth loss due to periodontitis. Further, tooth loss due to any reason was about 3 times higher than tooth loss due to periodontitis and was affected by a larger number of predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Successfully treated patients with a stable PPS maintained a small number of diseased teeth and barely lost any teeth during long-term SPC compared to patients who did not achieve a stable PPS after active periodontal therapy.

Second Attempt of Guided Tissue Regeneration on a Previous Successfully Grafted Site with Periodontal Breakdown-A 5-Year Follow-up

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been proven to promote attachment and regeneration of periodontal tissue. However, there is a 20 to 40% incidence of attachment loss on regenerated attachments reported in the literature. To my knowledge, this is the first case report on a second attempt in GTR on a previous successful grafted site with clinical attachment loss. A healthy 17-year-old Chinese male patient had GTR performed with xenograft particles and bovine resorbable membrane on his root-canal treated, fused upper right lateral incisor and upper right canine (#12-#13) in 2007. Probing depth on the mid-palatal region of #12-#13 was reduced to 4 mm and maintained for the next 4 years. But in the fifth year, probing depth increased to 11 mm with no endodontic symptoms, and a second attempt of GTR using the same materials was carried out. The probing depth at the surgical site was reduced to 4 mm and successfully maintained for another 5 years. Irregular maintenance and the presence of plaque retentive factor could have caused the clinical attachment loss on #12-#13. This case shows it is possible to attempt GTR on a previous successfully grafted site. GTR did not increase tissue resistance against periodontal breakdown. Hence, proper maintenance planning for GTR sites is important to prevent periodontal breakdown.

Medium- and long-term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews have established the short-term improvements of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared to conventional surgical treatment in intrabony defects. However, a hierarchy of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures regarding the medium- to long-term results of treatment does not exist.

AIM

To systematically assess the literature to answer the focused question "In periodontitis patients with intrabony defects, what are the medium- and long-term benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared with open flap debridement (OFD), in terms of clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters and tooth retention?".

MATERIAL & METHODS

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), reporting on clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures ≥3 years post-operatively, were systematically assessed. Clinical [residual probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, tooth loss] and radiographic [residual defect depth (RDD), bone gain (RBL)] outcome parameters were assessed. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed where possible.

RESULTS

Thirty RCTs, presenting data 3 to 20 years after treatment with grafting, GTR, EMD, as monotherapies, combinations thereof, and/or adjunctive use of blood-derived growth factor constructs or with OFD only, were included. NMA based on 21 RCTs showed that OFD was clearly the least efficacious treatment; regenerative/reconstructive treatments resulted in significantly shallower residual PD in 4 out 8 comparisons [range of mean differences (MD): -2.37 to -0.60 mm] and larger CAL gain in 6 out 8 comparisons (range of MD: 1.26 to 2.66 mm), and combination approaches appeared as the most efficacious. Tooth loss after regenerative/reconstructive treatment was less frequent (0.4%) compared to OFD (2.8%), but the evidence was sparse. There were only sparse radiographic data not allowing any relevant comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Periodontal regenerative/reconstructive therapy in intrabony defects results, in general, in shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain compared with OFD, translating in high rates of tooth survival, on a medium (3-5 years) to long-term basis (5-20 years). Combination approaches appear, in general, more efficacious compared to monotherapy in terms of shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain. A clear hierarchy could, however, not be established due to limited evidence.

Tooth survival and clinical outcomes up to 26 years after guided tissue regeneration therapy in deep intra-bony defects: Follow-up investigation of three randomized clinical trials

AIM

To investigate tooth survival and clinical long-term outcomes up to 26 years following guided tissue regeneration (GTR) therapy in deep intra-bony defects.

METHODS

Patients from three prospective clinical split-mouth studies, which investigated the outcomes of GTR therapy, were re-evaluated 21-26 years after surgery independent of the membrane type used, and tooth survival was assessed according to several site-specific and patient-related factors.

RESULTS

About 50 patients contributing 102 defects were available for this long-term follow-up. After up to 26 years (median 23.3 years), 52.9% of the teeth were still in situ. The median survival of the extracted teeth was 13.8 years. Patients with diabetes mellitus and/or smoking history lost significantly more teeth in the long term. Compared to the 1-year situation, there was no new median CAL loss after up to 26 years in the teeth which were still in situ.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, our data show that more than 50% of the initially seriously diseased teeth were still in situ up to 26 years following GTR therapy despite an overall limited adherence to SPT. In the majority of these teeth, the CAL gain 1 year after GTR could be maintained over this long period.

Infrabony defects 20 years after open flap debridement and guided tissue regeneration

AIM

Evaluation of 20-year results after open flap debridement (OFD) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) of infrabony defects in a randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In originally 16 periodontitis patients (baseline examination), periodontal surgery was performed in 44 infrabony defects. Polylactide acetyltributyl citrate barriers were randomly assigned to 23 out of these 44 defects (parallel). Ten of these patients (GTR) exhibited a second, contra-lateral defect (OFD) each (split-mouth). At baseline, 12, 120 and 240 ± 12 months after surgery probing depths, attachment level, bleeding on probing as well was Plaque Index, Gingival Bleeding Index and plaque control record were obtained.

RESULTS

Twelve patients contributing 38 defects were available at 240 months. At 12, 120 and 240 ± 12 months, both groups showed significant (p < 0.01) attachment gain (split-mouth: OFD: 12 months: 4.15 ± 2.93 mm; 120 months: 3.35 ± 2.37 mm, 240 months: 3.60 ± 2.55 mm; GTR: 12 months: 3.50 ± 2.47 mm; 120 months: 3.90 ± 2.76 mm, 240 months: 3.80 ± 2.69 mm; parallel: OFD: 12 months: 3.53 ± 2.04 mm; 120 months: 3.59 ± 2.54 mm, 240 months: 3.53 ± 2.50 mm; GTR: 12 months: 4.07 ± 2.88 mm; 120 months: 3.13 ± 2.22 mm, 240 months: 3.13 ± 2.22 mm). Seven teeth (3 OFD, 4 GTR) were lost. Only 1 patient out of 12 was kept in regular supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) over 20 years. The study failed to show significant attachment gain differences between both groups after 240 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty years after OFD and GTR in infrabony defects in a population with lack of regular SPT attachment gains at 12 months after surgery were stable. About 82% of the initially included teeth were still in place.

Five-year stability of clinical attachment after regenerative treatment of infrabony defects compared to controls

AIM

To evaluate the stability of attachment achieved in infrabony defects by regenerative treatment over 60 ± 12 months compared to control teeth.

METHODS

Patients treated regeneratively in at least one infrabony defect between 2004 and 2010 were screened for this retrospective cohort study. Complete examinations available for baseline, 12 and 60 ± 12 months after surgery, and a respective control tooth without treatment, provided eligibility for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (age 58 ± 11.7 years; 12 females, five smokers) were included, each contributing one infrabony defect and one control tooth. Regenerative therapy resulted in significant attachment gain (2.7 ± 1.6 mm; p < 0.001) after 1 and (3.0 ± 2.2 mm; p < 0.001) 5 years. Control teeth were stable (vertical probing attachment level [PAL-V] change: 1 year: 0 ± 0.8 mm; 5 years: -0.2 ± 1.2 mm). The study did not detect any significant change of PAL-V from 1 to 5 years after surgery for regenerative (-0.3 ± 2.4 mm) and control teeth (-0.2 ± 1.4 mm). Multivariate analysis associated smoking and generalized recurrence of periodontitis (amount of sites with PPD > 5 mm) with attachment loss.

CONCLUSIONS

PAL-V achieved by regenerative therapy in infrabony defects is as stable over 5 years as periodontally reduced but gingivally healthy or gingivitis sites. Smoking and periodontitis recurrence are associated with attachment loss.

Periodontal regenerative therapy in endo-periodontal lesions: a retrospective study over 5 years

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions.

Methods

A total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. After scaling and root planing with or without endodontic treatment, periodontal regenerative procedures with DBBM with 10% collagen alone or DBBM with a collagen membrane were performed, yielding the DBBM + 10% collagen and DBBM + collagen membrane groups, respectively. Changes in clinical parameters including the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, relative clinical attachment level, mobility, and radiographic bone gains were evaluated immediately before periodontal surgical procedures and at a 12-month follow-up.

Results

At the 12-month follow-up after regenerative procedures, improvements in clinical parameters and radiographic bone gains were observed in both treatment groups. The DBBM + 10% collagen group showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (4.52±1.06 mm) than the DBBM + collagen membrane group (4.04±0.82 mm). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the radiographic bone gain in the DBBM + 10% collagen group (5.15±1.54 mm) was comparable to that of the DBBM + collagen membrane group (5.35±1.84 mm). The 5-year survival rate of the teeth with endo-periodontal lesions after periodontal regenerative procedures was 92.31%.

Conclusions

This study showed that regenerative procedures using DBBM with 10% collagen alone improved the clinical attachment level and radiographic bone level in endo-periodontal lesions. Successful maintenance of the results after regenerative procedures in endo-periodontal lesions can be obtained by repeated oral hygiene education within strict supportive periodontal treatment.

Periodontal regeneration compared with access flap surgery in human intra-bony defects 20-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial: tooth retention, periodontitis recurrence and costs

AIM

Compare the long-term outcomes and costs of three treatment modalities in intra-bony defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five intra-bony defects in 45 patients had been randomly allocated to receive: modified papilla preservation technique with titanium-reinforced expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes (MPPT Tit, N = 15); access flap with expanded-PTFE membranes (Flap-ePTFE, N = 15) and access flap alone (Flap, N = 15). Supportive periodontal care (SPC) was provided monthly for 1 year, then every 3 months for 20 years. Periodontal therapy was delivered to sites showing recurrences.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients complied with SPC. Four subjects were lost to follow-up. Clinical attachment-level differences between 1 and 20 years were -0.1 ± 0.3 mm (p = 0.58) in the MPPT Tit; -0.5 ± 0.1 mm (p = 0.003) in the Flap-ePTFE and -1.7 ± 0.4 mm (p < 0.001) in the Flap. At 20 years, sites treated with Flap showed greater attachment loss compared to MPPT Tit (1.4 ± 0.4 mm; p = 0.008) and to Flap-ePTFE (1.1 ± 0.4 mm; p = 0.03). Flap group lost two treated teeth. Five episodes of recurrences occurred in the MPPT Tit, six in the Flap-ePTFE and fifteen in the Flap group. Residual pocket depth at 1-year was significantly correlated with the number of recurrences (p = 0.002). Sites treated with flap had greater OR for recurrences and higher costs of re-intervention than regenerated sites over a 20-year follow-up period with SPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Regeneration provided better long-term benefits than Flap: no tooth loss, less periodontitis progression and less expense from re-intervention over a 20-year period. These benefits need to be interpreted in the context of higher immediate costs associated with regenerative treatment. These initial observations need to be extended to larger groups and broader clinical settings.

Thirty-year stability after regeneration of a deep intrabony defect: a case report

AIMS

Report clinical improvements and 30-year stability of clinical outcomes of an intrabony defect treated with non-resorbable barriers and mucogingival surgery.

METHODS

A 18-year-old male presenting with a very severe intrabony defect at the upper right central incisor was treated with periodontal regeneration with non-resorbable barriers and a fibrin-fibronectin glue. The barriers were removed after 3 months. At 6 months, a free gingival graft (FGG) was positioned to improve mucogingival conditions. The patient was enrolled into a 6-month supportive periodontal care programme (SPC) for 30 years.

RESULTS

Clinical attachment level (CAL) of 16 mm was associated with a 12 mm osseous defect and a pocket (PD) 14 mm deep. At 1 year, a CAL of 5 mm was associated with a PD of 2 mm. The 5 mm gingival recession measured at 6 months and treated with FGG was reduced to 3 mm. Measurements taken at 10, 20 and 30 years showed a consistent creeping of the gingival margin. At 30-year examination, CAL gain was 12 mm associated with a 2 mm PD and a minimal gingival recession.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates that it is possible to treat a very severe infrabony pocket applying regeneration and mucogingival surgery and to maintain the clinical outcomes for 30 years.

Long-term outcome following regenerative periodontal treatment of intrabony defects

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of the regenerative periodontal therapy of an intrabony defect in terms of tooth survival and clinical attachment level (CAL) stability. The association between failure and patient as well as tooth variables was assessed. Treatment records of the patients who received regenerative surgery and re-evaluation at 1-year post-surgery were screened. Patient and tooth variables, defect characteristics, and types of treatments were collected. Periodontal parameters were retrieved before regenerative surgery (baseline), 1-year post-surgery, and every visits of supportive periodontal treatment (SPT) until failure, including tooth loss or CAL loss ≥2 mm was found. In this study, treatment records from 89 patients were included. These patients continued SPT from 0.5-11.16 years. Of these patients, 92.1 % survived from tooth loss, while 61.8 % survived from CAL loss ≥2 mm compared to 1-year post-surgery. At the sites with residual pocket depth <5 mm, patients attending SPT >80 % had a significantly less percentage of teeth with CAL loss ≥2 mm compared to 1-year post-surgery than those attending SPT <80 %. However, at the sites with residual pocket depth ≥5 mm, no significant difference in the percentage of teeth with CAL loss ≥2 mm was found between patients attending SPT >80 % or <80 %. Smoking, patient's compliance, and residual pocket depth after regenerative surgery were significantly associated with tooth loss. However, these factors were not significantly associated with CAL loss compared to baseline or 1-year post-surgery.

Current perspective of the impact of smoking on the progression and treatment of periodontitis

This literature review provides an overview of the current scenario regarding the impact of smoking on the progression and treatment of periodontitis; clinical, microbiological and immunological data from studies from our and other groups are presented. In general, preclinical and clinical data are unanimous in demonstrating that smokers present increased susceptibility, greater severity and faster progression of periodontal disease compared with nonsmokers. The evidence further demonstrates that smokers lose more teeth and have a less favorable response to therapy than do nonsmokers. Although it is well established that smoking significantly impacts on the onset, progression and outcome of periodontal disease, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. More importantly, some of the reported deleterious effects of smoking on periodontal tissues have been reported to be reversible upon participation in smoking-cessation programs. Therefore, clinicians should strongly advise smokers to enroll in cessation strategies, even temporarily, in order to improve the overall outcome.

Periodontal Regeneration - Intrabony Defects: Practical Applications From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

Focused Clinical Question: What are important considerations for selecting a predictable regenerative surgical approach for intrabony defects? Summary: The predictable regeneration of intrabony defects remains an important goal in the management of periodontitis. Clinical and histologic evidence of periodontal regeneration has been shown for multiple regenerative therapies, including bone replacement grafts, guided tissue regeneration, and biologics, when used alone or in combination. Regenerative therapies improve periodontal health, as evidenced by gains in clinical attachment level, reductions in probing depth, and gains in radiographic bone fill. Important patient-related factors (e.g., smoking) and defect/site-related factors (e.g., defect morphology and gingival biotype) can influence the potential to achieve periodontal regeneration. The regeneration of intrabony defects generally becomes more challenging with increasing loss of height, proximity, and number of bony walls. Therefore, combination therapies may be necessary to achieve predictable regeneration. Clinical improvements after regenerative therapy can be maintained over extended periods (≥10 years) with professional maintenance at appropriate intervals and adequate home care. Conclusions: Periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects is possible using a variety of regenerative strategies. Management should be coupled with an effective oral hygiene and supportive periodontal maintenance program for long-term success.

Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis

BACKGROUND

This split-mouth, double-blind randomized controlled trial evaluated radiographic changes in infrabony defects treated with open flap debridement (OFD) or OFD associated with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) after a 24-month follow-up. The radiographic distance from the CEJ to the bottom of the defect (BD) was considered the primary outcome. CEJ-BC and defect angle were secondary outcomes.

METHODS

Ten patients presenting 2 or more defects were selected. An individualized film holder was used to take standardized radiographs of the 43 defects, at baseline and after 24 months. Images were digitized and used to measure the distances from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest (AC), CEJ to the bottom of the defect (BD) and infrabony defect angle. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS for Windows (version 5.2). Paired samples t test was used to compare test and control groups and to evaluate changes within each group. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05%.

RESULTS

After 24 months, a significant crestal bone loss was observed for EMD (1.01 mm; p = 0.049) but not for OFD (0.14 mm; p = 0.622). However, no differences were detected between groups (p = 0.37). Reduction of the bone defect depth was significant for OFD (0.70 mm; p = 0.005) but not for EMD (0.04 mm; p = 0.86), while no differences were detected between them (p = 0.87). Both EMD (0.69°; p = 0.82) and OFD (5.71°; p = 0.24) showed an improvement in defect angle measurements but no significant differences were observed after 24 months or between the groups (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Linear radiographic analysis was not able to demonstrate superiority of EMD treated infrabony defects when compared to ODF after 24 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02195765. Registered 17 July 2014.

Periodontal regeneration - intrabony defects: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop

BACKGROUND

Previous systematic reviews of periodontal regeneration with bone replacement grafts and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) were defined as state of the art for clinical periodontal regeneration as of 2002.

METHODS

The purpose of this systematic review is to update those consensus reports by reviewing periodontal regeneration approaches developed for the correction of intrabony defects with the focus on patient-, tooth-, and site-centered factors, surgical approaches, surgical determinants, and biologics. This review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews. A computerized search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to evaluate the clinically available regenerative approaches for intrabony defects. The search included screening of original reports, review articles, and reference lists of retrieved articles and hand searches of selected journals. All searches were focused on clinically available regenerative approaches with histologic evidence of periodontal regeneration in humans published in English. For topics in which the literature is lacking, non-randomized observational and experimental animal model studies were used. Therapeutic endpoints examined included changes in clinical attachment level, changes in bone level/fill, and probing depth. For purposes of analysis, change in bone fill was used as the primary outcome measure, except in cases in which this information was not available. The SORT (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy) grading scale was used in evaluating the body of knowledge.

RESULTS

1) Fifty-eight studies provided data on patient, tooth, and surgical-site considerations in the treatment of intrabony defects. 2) Forty-five controlled studies provided outcome analysis on the use of biologics for the treatment of intrabony defects.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Biologics (enamel matrix derivative and recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB plus β-tricalcium phosphate) are generally comparable with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and GTR and superior to open flap debridement procedures in improving clinical parameters in the treatment of intrabony defects. 2) Histologic evidence of regeneration has been demonstrated with laser therapy; however, data are limited on clinical predictability and effectiveness. 3) Clinical outcomes appear most appreciably influenced by patient behaviors and surgical approach rather than by tooth and defect characteristics. 4) Long-term studies indicate that improvements in clinical parameters are maintainable up to 10 years, even in severely compromised teeth, consistent with a favorable/good long-term prognosis.

Long-term clinical results on the use of platelet concentrate in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this clinical investigation was to evaluate long-term results obtained with the combination of platelet pellet (PP) plus bioabsorbable barrier membrane (BM) and to compare this outcome with the results obtained using bioactive glass (BG) graft material with a BM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a split mouth design, 11 chronic periodontitis patients (power ≥ at least 80%) were randomly assigned to treatment with a combination of PP/GTR or BG/GTR in contra-lateral dentition areas. Clinical attachment level (CAL) as the primary outcome variable, calculated as the sum of probing pocket depth (PPD) and gingival recession, and radiological alveolar bone level were recorded at baseline, 6 months and 5 years.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between test and control defects at baseline. PPD reductions and CAL and radiological alveolar bone height gains were statistically significant between baseline and 6 months and between baseline and 5 years in both groups (p < 0.01). Six months results of frequency distribution showed that 82% of the defects attained ≥ 4 mm CAL gain in both groups, while 5 year results showed that 73% of the defects attained 2 mm ≤ CAL gain < 4 mm in the PP/BM group and 55% of the defects attained 2 mm ≤ CAL gain < 4 mm in the BG/BM group. All parameters evaluated showed no significant differences between 6 months and 5 years in both groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference in any of the clinical parameters was observed at 6 months and 5 years between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term efficacy of platelet concentrate combined with a barrier membrane is similar with the combination of bioactive glass graft material and barrier membrane, suggesting that results obtained with both treatment approaches can be maintained over a period of 5 years.

Periodontal healing following reconstructive surgery: effect of guided tissue regeneration using a bioresorbable barrier device when combined with autogenous bone grafting. A randomized-controlled trial 10-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this 10-year randomized-controlled trial follow-up was to evaluate the stability of treatment outcomes following the implantation of autogenous bone graft with or without guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of deep intra-bony periodontal defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients exhibiting deep intra-bony periodontal defects were included in a randomized-controlled trial evaluating the adjunctive effect of GTR to autogenous bone graft. Twenty-six of 39 patients completing the original study were available for follow-up 10 years post-treatment. The patients had been included in a structured maintenance programme and were evaluated using the criteria of the original study by the same investigators.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in the probing depth and clinical attachment level were observed for both groups between baseline and 9 months. Whereas the autogenous bone graft+GTR group showed significant improvements in probing bone levels and increased gingival recession at 9 months, no significant differences were observed for the autogenous bone graft group. Nine-month within-group results were maintained throughout the 10-year follow-up. Nevertheless, between-group comparisons at 10 years showed that the autogenous bone graft+GTR group exhibited significantly greater probing depth reduction (mean +/- SE: 4.2 +/- 0.5 versus 2.7 +/- 0.5 mm, p=0.023) and probing bone-level gain (3.9 +/- 0.8 versus 1.3 +/- 0.9 mm, p=0.034) than the autogenous bone graft group. Borderline significant differences between the autogenous bone graft+GTR and the autogenous bone graft groups were observed for clinical attachment level gain at 10 years (3.8 +/- 0.5 versus 2.2 +/- 0.7 mm, p=0.067), whereas no significant differences were observed for gingival recession (0.7 +/- 0.3 versus 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm, p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this randomized study suggest that statistically significant differences were found with the adjunct use of GTR to an autogenous bone graft at 10 years. Nevertheless, these results should be interpreted with caution in light of its clinical relevance and biological rationale. Importantly, resolution of deep intra-bony periodontal defects can be maintained in the presence of a structured maintenance programme emphasizing high oral hygiene standards.

Commentary: prognosis revisited: a system for assigning periodontal prognosis

Prognosis is an integral part of the periodontal practice because it directly influences treatment planning. However, there is limited direct evidence in the literature regarding the assignment of periodontal prognosis. There are several important concepts to consider in developing a system of periodontal prognosis. Traditional systems are based on tooth loss and may have limited use for patient management. On the other hand, prognosis can be based on stability of the periodontal supporting apparatus, which is influenced by more evidence-based factors and may be more useful for patient management. Other important concepts include the timing of the projection (short and long term) and the consideration of individual teeth versus the overall dentition. Historically, several authors have formulated and investigated their own prognostication systems. Results were variable, but they generally showed that systems based on tooth loss were unpredictable over the long term. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to review relevant literature and propose a new periodontal prognostication system.

Surgical guided tissue regeneration treatment of advanced periodontal defects: a 5-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

To study the 5-year outcome of combined use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) barriers and bovine bone in advanced periodontal defects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In each of 24 patients, one defect was surgically exposed, debrided, filled with bovine bone, and covered with a bioresorbable barrier. Re-examinations were made after 1, 3, and 5 years.

RESULTS

Average full-mouth plaque scores (FMPS) were 14.5% at baseline and 10.7%, 9.8%, and 18.9% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Mean probing pocket depth (PPD) was 10.0 mm at baseline. Mean PPD reduction was 5.2 mm after 1 year, 5.6 mm after 3 years, and 5.3 mm after 5 years. Mean gingival recession was 1.0 mm after 1 year, 1.6 mm after 3 years, and 1.3 mm after 5 years. Mean gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) was 4.2 mm at the 1-year, 4.1 mm at the 3-year, and 4.3 mm at the 5-year examination. Smoking significantly influenced CAL change at all re-examinations. FMPS were significantly correlated with radiographic defect depth at the 5-year examination and CAL with smoking and FMPS at the 3-year examination.

CONCLUSION

Advanced periodontal defects can be successfully treated with the combined use of GTR barriers and bovine bone to substantially reduce PPD and achieve a stable, long-term gain of CAL.

Use of guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of a lateral periodontal cyst with a 7-month reentry

BACKGROUND

The lateral periodontal cyst (LPC) is an unusual cyst of odontogenic origin, most frequently encountered in the mandible between the roots of canines and premolars. The most common treatment for LPC is surgical enucleation. This article reports a case of an LPC treated with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and bone allograft.

METHODS

A 74-year-old woman presented for periodontal examination. Radiographs revealed a cystic lesion with LPC characteristics. After surgical incisions and flap reflection, the cyst was removed and sent for biopsy. Because of the anatomy of the resulting intrabony defect, GTR was considered the ideal treatment.

RESULTS

The biopsy revealed the histologic features of an LPC. Radiographs at 7 months post-treatment indicated bone fill of the initial defect. Although some attachment loss occurred, the reentry demonstrated a high percentage of bone fill of the defect after 7 months.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the anatomy of the defect left after the removal of an LPC, GTR, along with bone grafting, can be a very useful tool for its treatment by reducing the attachment loss observed after simple enucleation of the cyst.

Stability of Clinical and Radiographic Results After Guided Tissue Regeneration in Infrabony Defects

BACKGROUND

The aim of this 5-year follow-up study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the long-term results after guided tissue regeneration (GTR) therapy of infrabony defects using non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with periodontitis and 50 infrabony defects that had been treated using GTR were recruited. Eleven defects were treated with non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes and 39 defects with bioabsorbable barriers. At baseline and 6 and 60 +/- 3 months after surgery, clinical parameters and standardized radiographs were obtained. During surgery and 60 +/- 3 months thereafter, the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the base of the bony defect (vertical probing bone level [PBL-V]) was measured. Bone gain was evaluated using digital subtraction radiography.

RESULTS

At 6 and 60 +/- 3 months after GTR, there was a statistically significant (P <0.001) reduction of probing depth (6 months: 4.31 +/- 1.76 mm; 60 months: 3.95 +/- 1.62 mm) and vertical clinical attachment level gains (CAL-V) (6 months: 3.34 +/- 1.66 mm; 60 months: 2.97 +/- 1.53 mm). From 6 to 60 months after GTR, three infrabony defects exhibited CAL-V loss >2 mm, and a small, statistically not significant mean CAL-V loss of 0.39 +/- 1.60 mm was observed. From baseline to 60 +/- 3 months, a significant PBL-V gain of 1.78 +/- 2.67 mm (P <0.001) and increase in bone density were observed (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The CAL-V gain achieved after GTR in infrabony defects using both non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers was stable after 5 years in 47 of 50 defects.