Factors influencing the frequency of bitewing radiography in general dental practice

A historical review of the effects of dental radiography on pregnant patients

BACKGROUND

The safety of dental radiography performed on pregnant patients has been a controversial topic since the 1960s. This review synthesizes and consolidates findings, from 1957 through 2021, of the effects dental ionizing radiation could have on a pregnant patient and in utero birth defects.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

Using PubMed, the following key words were searched: pregnancy, radiology, radiograph, radiation dose, fetus, x-ray, and dental. Criteria evaluation was done on the basis of availability, completeness, quality, relevance, technicality (that is, dental radiography), topicality (that is, pregnant patients), and usability. These results were then filtered on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data as well as the period (decades within the historical framework). The final selection of relevant literature consisted of various studies including cohort studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, and other narrative reviews.

RESULTS

If properly performed, the amount of ionizing radiation produced during dental radiographic procedures is so low that it is unlikely to reach the teratogenic threshold. Thus, dental ionizing radiation is unlikely to cause in utero birth defects because it has been detected to have a deterministic (not stochastic) effect. With this information and historical context, this article shows that necessary dental radiography is safe at any stage during pregnancy, as long as proper safety equipment is appropriately used.

CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

As technology advances, more research can further clarify ionizing radiation safety for pregnant patients and its potential effects on in utero birth defects, improving overall oral health care. The dental community must remain educated about current ionizing radiation safety guidelines to make better-informed decisions and successfully provide proper oral health care to pregnant patients.

Prescription of bite-wing and panoramic radiographs in pediatric dental patients: An assessment of current trends and provider compliance

BACKGROUND

The aim of the authors was to evaluate prescription patterns for bite-wing and panoramic radiographs (PRs) for pediatric and adolescent dental patients after the implementation of the most recent guidelines from the American Dental Association and US Food and Drug Administration.

METHODS

The authors accessed paid insurance claims data for all 50 states from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2019, for patients 18 years and younger and extracted a 5% random sample population. The authors performed statistical analyses to evaluate various imaging metrics for pediatric dentists (PDs) and general practitioners (GPs).

RESULTS

A total of 2,123,735 bite-wing images were ordered during 4,734,249 office visits. The average (standard deviation [SD]) time interval between bite-wing examinations ordered by GPs was 13.9 (7.4) months, and for PDs the average (SD) was 13.0 (6.7) months (P < .0001). When divided by age group, 3.5% of all bite-wings were obtained from patients aged 0 through 4 years. For PRs, the authors included 286,824 images in this study. The average (SD) time interval between PRs ordered for the same patient was 3.4 (1.3) years for PDs and 3.3 (1.4) years for GPs. One percent of all PRs were ordered for patients aged 0 through 4 years, with 403 images attributed to PDs and 2,348 to GPs.

CONCLUSIONS

PDs were more likely to comply with the guidelines on radiograph prescriptions for pediatric and adolescent patients than GPs.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Inclusion of patient caries risk with insurance claims data could be considered for more appropriate administration of dental radiography. Future guidelines should be developed to include more explicit recommendations for prescribing PRs.

Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology

Cone beam CT (CBCT) is a relatively new imaging modality, which is now widely available to dentists for examining hard tissues in the dental and maxillofacial regions. CBCT gives a three-dimensional depiction of anatomy and pathology, which is similar to medical CT and uses doses generally higher than those used in conventional dental imaging. The European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology recognizes that dentists receive training in two-dimensional dental imaging as undergraduates, but most of them have received little or no training in the application and interpretation of cross-sectional three-dimensional imaging. This document identifies the roles of dentists involved in the use of CBCT, examines the training requirements for the justification, acquisition and interpretation of CBCT imaging and makes recommendations for further training of dentists in Europe who intend to be involved in any aspect of CBCT imaging. Two levels of training are recognized. Level 1 is intended to train dentists who prescribe CBCT imaging, such that they may request appropriately and understand the resultant reported images. Level 2 is intended to train to a more advanced level and covers the understanding and skills needed to justify, carry out and interpret a CBCT examination. These recommendations are not intended to create specialists in CBCT imaging but to offer guidance on the training of all dentists to enable the safe use of CBCT in the dentoalveolar region.

Adherence to NICE guidelines on recall intervals and the FGDP(UK) Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography

AIM

The study investigated adherence of GDPs to National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on recall intervals and the FGDP (UK)'s Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. It also explored any factors that might influence GDPs' compliance with the guidelines.

METHOD

A previously piloted questionnaire was circulated to all GDPs within the district of the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (UHB). The questionnaire sought demographic data as well as answers to questions relating to compliance with guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 215 questionnaires, 133 (61.9%) were returned. One hundred a nd thirty (97.7%) respondents were familiar with NICE recall guidelines and 112 (84.2%) were familiar with the FGDP(UK) publication Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. Thirty six (27.7%) 'always' followed the NICE recall guidelines and, overall, 108 (81.8%) 'always or mostly' followed the guidance. Fifty one (38.6%) respondents 'always' carried out a caries risk assessment for adult patients and 57 (43.5%) 'always' carried out a caries risk assessment for child patients. Seventy nine (59.8%) reported that they 'always or mostly' recorded the patient's disease risk category in the notes. Fifty two (39.7%) respondents 'always' took bitewing radiographs that corresponded to disease risk. Overall, however, 119 GDPs (90.8%) 'always or mostly' took bitewing radiographs at appropriate intervals according to disease risk. Bitewing radiographs for new adult patients were prescribed more often for new child patients. The dentist's length of experience, NHS commitment, country of graduation, access to digital radiography or panoramic machines, receipt of any postgraduate qualifications or involvement in dental foundation training were proven not to have any statistically significant association with adherence to NICE or FGDP(UK) guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Most dentists are familiar with NICE guidelines on recall intervals and the FGDP(UK)'s Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. The number of dentists who always comply with these sets of guidance is low. None of the variables investigated were shown to have any statistically significant association with adherence to these guidelines.

How do dental and prenatal care practitioners perceive dental care during pregnancy? Current evidence and implications

BACKGROUND

Poor maternal oral health may be associated with adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes. However, women seldom seek dental care during pregnancy, and misconceptions by prenatal care practitioners about oral health care during pregnancy may contribute to the problem. The aim of this study was to review current knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of dental and prenatal care practitioners about oral health care during pregnancy.

METHODS

This review examined all studies published in English that explored the knowledge, attitude, behavior, and barriers faced by dentists, general practitioners, midwives, and obstetricians/gynecologists with respect to oral health care during pregnancy.

RESULTS

Despite acknowledging the importance of maternal oral health, many dentists are uncertain about the safety of dental procedures and are hesitant in treating pregnant women. General practitioners and midwives are poorly informed about the impact of poor maternal oral health and rarely initiate this topic during prenatal care. Many general practitioners also believe that dental procedures are unsafe during pregnancy. Obstetricians/gynecologists are well informed about perinatal oral health and are supportive of dental procedures, but because of lack of training in this area and competing health demands they seldom focus on oral health care during their prenatal care.

CONCLUSION

No real consensus exists among dentists and prenatal care practitioners with respect to oral health care during pregnancy. This issue poses a significant deterrent for pregnant women seeking dental care. Practice guidelines in perinatal oral health are needed for health professionals to emphasize this important aspect of prenatal care.

Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology

OBJECTIVES

Survey by questionnaire is a widely used research method in dental radiology. A major concern in reviews of questionnaires is non-response. The objectives of this study were to review questionnaire studies in dental radiology with regard to potential survey errors and to develop recommendations to assist future researchers.

METHODS

A literature search with the software search package PubMed was used to obtain internet-based access to Medline through the website www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. A search of the English language peer-reviewed literature was conducted of all published studies, with no restriction on date. The search strategy found articles with dates from 1983 to 2010. The medical subject heading terms used were "questionnaire", "dental radiology" and "dental radiography". The reference sections of articles retrieved by this method were hand-searched in order to identify further relevant papers. Reviews, commentaries and relevant studies from the wider literature were also included.

RESULTS

53 questionnaire studies were identified in the dental literature that concerned dental radiography and included a report of response rate. These were all published between 1983 and 2010. In total, 87 articles are referred to in this review, including the 53 dental radiology studies. Other cited articles include reviews, commentaries and examples of studies outside dental radiology where they are germane to the arguments presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-response is only one of four broad areas of error to which questionnaire surveys are subject. This review considers coverage, sampling and measurement, as well as non-response. Recommendations are made to assist future research that uses questionnaire surveys.

An Investigation into the Bitewing Radiographic Prescribing Patterns of West Kent General Dental Practitioners

Aims

The primary aims of the study were to investigate the use of bitewing radiography within primary dental care and adherence to guidelines on bitewing radiography by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the West Kent Primary Care Trust (PCT) area. Within the overall aims, the study had objectives to investigate the use of radiographic guidelines, audit and caries risk assessment, the influence of private and National Health Service (NHS) practice, and the influence of the demographic profile of the GDPs on these variables.

Methods

Data were gathered via a piloted self-completion questionnaire, circulated to all GDPs listed on the NHS Choices website as practising in the West Kent PCT area. Three mailings and follow-up telephone calls were used. The resulting data were entered into a statistical software database and, where relevant, statistically tested, using the chi-square test.

Results

Of 223 GDPs, 167 responded (75%). GDPs with a high NHS commitment were significantly less likely to follow Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) guidance on prescribing bitewing radiographs for adults ( P<0.01) and children ( P<0.05) than were mainly private GDPs. Mainly NHS GDPs were more likely ‘always/mostly’ to follow National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance (83 compared to 59) ( P<0.05) and also to risk-assess patients (83 compared to 62). Only 115 (71%) had carried out a radio graphic audit or peer review in the preceding three years. Those with postgraduate qualifications were more likely ( P<0.05) to carry out radiographic audit.

Conclusions

The study confirmed previous research reporting the under-use of radiography for caries detection and also the failure of some GDPs to comply with ionising radiation regulations. West Kent GDPs with a high NHS commitment were less likely to follow radiographic guidance than their private counterparts. This suggests that further efforts to disseminate information on radiographic guidelines and to educate GDPs are necessary to improve adherence with all aspects of radiography within general dental practice. Research into factors that influence GDPs’ decision-making with regards to radiographic prescription may further inform the profession as to the best methods to lead to behavioural change. The dental profession and its regulators need to make a concerted effort to educate and inform GDPs so that this behaviour is modified.

An Investigation into Dental Digital Radiography in Dental Practices in West Kent following the Introduction of the 2006 NHS General Dental Services Contract

Aims

The primary aims of the study were to investigate the use of digital radiography within primary dental care practices in the West Kent Primary Care Trust (PCT) area and general dental practitioners’ (GDPs) self-reported change in radiographic prescribing patterns following the introduction of the nGDS contract in 2006.

Methods

Data were gathered via a piloted, self-completed questionnaire, and circulated to all GDPs listed on the National Health Service (NHS) Choices website as practising in the West Kent PCT area. There were three mailings and follow-up telephone calls. The resulting data were entered into a statistical software database and, where relevant, statistically tested, using the chi-square test and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

Of 223 GDPs, 168 (75%) responded. There were 163 usable questionnaires. The respondents represented 85% of the general dental practices in West Kent. Eighty (49%) respondents were using digital intra-oral radiography. Of those who used digital radiography, 44 (55%) reported that they used phosphor plate systems and 36 (45%) that they used direct digital sensors. Eighty-three (51%) had a panoramic machine in their practice, 46 of whom (55%) were using digital systems; of these, 32 (67%) were using a direct digital system. Seventy-one GDPs reported that they worked exclusively or mainly in private practice. Forty (56%) of these ‘mainly private’ GDPs reported that they used digital radiographic systems, whereas only 40 (44%) of the 89 ‘mainly NHS’ GDPs reported using digital radiographic systems. On average, mainly private GDPs made the transition to a digital radiographic system six months before mainly NHS GDPs. Of those who provided NHS dentistry before and after April 2006, only 18 (14%) reported taking fewer radiographs and seven (6%) taking more.

Conclusions

In February 2010, of the West Kent GDPs who responded to the questionnaire, just under 50% used digital radiography. Mainly private GDPs were more likely to use digital radiography than their mainly NHS counterparts. A link between digital radiography and increased prescription of radiographs was not specifically apparent from this study. There was no evidence that West Kent GDPs were taking fewer radiographs than they did prior to the introduction of the new GDS contract in April 2006. Research is needed to investigate whether the uptake of digital radiography by GDPs in the rest of the country is similar to that in West Kent.

Service patterns associated with coronal caries in private general dental practice

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pattern of dental services associated with dental caries by level of carious lesion severity.

METHODS

Data were collected by a mailed survey from a random sample of dentists from each State/Territory in Australia in 2003-2004. Dentists provided service data on patients treated on a typical clinical day for patients attending with a diagnosis of dental caries.

RESULTS

Restorative rates were higher for insured patients, radiograph rates were higher for emergency visits, prophylaxis and topical fluoride rates were higher for non-emergency visits and at capital city locations with topical fluoride also higher for patients from higher socio-economic status areas, endodontic rates were higher for emergency visits and at non-capital city locations, while extraction rates were higher for males, uninsured patients and for emergency visits. Poisson regression models compared the rates of services from different service areas for initial and cavitated carious lesions with gross carious lesions, controlling for patient demographics, visit type, location and socio-economic status. Restorative services were provided at higher rates (P<0.05) for cavitated carious lesions (RR=2.38), radiographs were provided at lower rates for both initial (RR=0.28) and cavitated carious lesions (RR=0.31), both prophylaxis and topical fluoride services were provided at higher rates for initial carious lesions (RR=2.33 and 3.00, respectively), endodontic services were provided at lower rates for both initial (RR=0.03) and cavitated carious lesions (RR=0.07), and extractions were provided at lower rates for both initial (RR=0.23) and cavitated carious lesions (RR=0.16) compared to the reference category of gross caries.

CONCLUSION

Service patterns varied by level of carious lesion severity with initial carious lesions managed by more preventive services, cavitated carious lesions with more restorative services, gross carious lesions with more radiographic, endodontic and extraction services. However, initial carious lesions tend to be managed with restorative rather than preventive service, suggesting scope for increased management by minimum intervention approaches.

The prevalence and nature of recent self-reported changes in general dental practice in a sample of English general dental practitioners

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent and types of change in seven domains of dental practice in a sample of English general dental practitioners (GDPs).

METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to 561 GDPs on the dental lists of three health authorities in diverse regions of England. Information collected included demographic details on personal and practice characteristics, self-rating of amount of change in the seven domains of practice and factors influencing change.

RESULTS

The response rate was 60%. Fifty-six per cent of the sample were under 40 years old. Over a third of respondents reported "changing a lot or completely" certain clinical activities, practice management arrangements and practice amenities. The highest self-reported level of change was in clinical activities. Of the GDPs who reported changing their clinical activities, 56% reported an increase in preventive care, followed by crown and bridge (44%), periodontics (44%) and endodontics (43%). Practice management rated second in the mean rank scores for self-reported change. The main changes reported were the introduction of computer systems and employment of practice managers. A sizeable percentage (66%) reported increasing the amount of information they provided to patients and the time spent discussing care. Quality assurance activities were the area of practice least likely to have changed over a 5-year period. Over half the sample reported not being involved in any quality assurance activities in the previous 5 years. Those respondents who were younger, had a postgraduate qualification and earned more than 20% of their income from private practice reported higher levels of change.

CONCLUSIONS

General dental practitioners' work patterns are dynamic and appear to be responding to changing needs and demands on their service. The main changes were in the types of clinical procedures being carried out. The low prevalence of changes reported in auditing and peer review activities needs to be investigated further.

An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow

AIM

In recent years there have been a number of reviews and guidelines published with respect to the diagnosis and management of caries in children. Bitewing radiography remains the recommended method of choice for caries diagnosis in most circumstances. The aims of the study were to investigate the usage of bitewing radiography by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Greater Glasgow, for the diagnosis of caries in children and to assess the usefulness of the technique as perceived by these dental practitioners.

DESIGN

A questionnaire for self completion was sent to all GDPs with an NHS list number in the Greater Glasgow area.

RESULTS

An 80% response rate was obtained with 303 GDPs responding. Less than half the dentists (44%) indicated that they always carried out caries risk assessments for all children, but 71% reported doing this for 6 and 7-year-old children. Approximately 60% of dentists stated they had read the recent radiation and caries management guidelines. Only 72% stated that they used radiography as a caries diagnostic tool in children, with 12 GDPs (4%) indicating they would never consider using bitewing radiography in children. Only 17% would consider taking bitewing radiographs in children under 6 years, and the majority of dentists (61%) reported that they would first consider taking radiographs in the 6-11-year-old age group. However, only a low proportion of children in this age band had dental x-rays taken. Bitewing radiography was considered to be more important for 12-year-olds than for 6-year-olds. Recommended methods for decreasing radiation exposure such as rectangular collimation and film holders were not being used universally, with 41% and 58% respectively using these devices.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of dentists in Greater Glasgow are not complying with recent guidelines and recommendations and it would appear that the value of bitewing radiography as a diagnostic tool in children is not being fully exploited.

Use of the basic periodontal examination and radiographs in the assessment of periodontal diseases in general dental practice

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate (1) the use of the basic periodontal examination (BPE) by general dental practitioners (GDPs) and their selection of radiographs for the assessment of periodontal disease and (2) whether this selection concurred with existing selection (referral) criteria.

METHODS

Three mailings of a self-completion questionnaire were sent to 800 GDPs working in the National Health General Dental Service in England and Wales. Dentists were presented with six clinical scenarios for which they were asked to describe their use of radiographs.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of dentists reported that they used the BPE in new patients, with 56% using it for all patients; 84% of dentists used BPE in recall patients. BPE use was related to the dentists' age and postgraduate qualifications. There was a wide variation in the radiographic views used for periodontal disease assessment. The choice of radiographs was not generally in line with the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) 1998 selection criteria, particularly for the clinical scenarios of pocketing >5 mm, irregular pocketing or pockets associated with teeth with heavy restorations. Sixty seven percent of dentists concurred with recommendations for radiographs for a suspected periodontal-endodontic lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of dentists reported clinical screening for periodontal diseases using the BPE. There was considerable variation in the selection and use of radiographs and practice was not in line with existing guidelines for many clinical situations. Evidence-based referral criteria should be actively promoted to ensure high standards of radiographic practice in general dental practice.

Radiographic prevalence of approximal enamel lesions and relationship with dentine lesions and restorations in Dutch adolescents

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of approximal enamel lesions from radiographs in groups of 14, 17, 20 and 23 years old, and to determine the relation with dentine lesions and restorations present.

METHOD

Per age group, the bitewings of 120 persons were randomly selected and assessed for enamel lesions from the distal surface of the first premolar to the mesial surface of the second molar. A second examiner assessed 20% of the material for enamel lesions to determine the interexaminer agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.63).

RESULTS

An enamel lesion was found in 12-15% of the unfilled surfaces. The mean number of surfaces with enamel lesions was almost three per person. For all age groups it was found that about 20% of the persons had at least four enamel lesions and the number of enamel lesions was significantly correlated with the number of dentine lesions. Of all enamel lesions 20% were found in persons without any dentinal lesions or restorations.

CONCLUSION

The bitewing radiographs showed a considerable number of enamel lesions for these age groups. This seems to justify its use on a routine base as a diagnostic tool at the age of 14-16 years.

Evidence-based dentistry: an overview of the challenges in changing professional practice

A great deal of effort and resources are currently being directed at developing an evidence-based approach to healthcare delivery. The success of the evidence-based movement will depend upon the provision of necessary support to help GDPs achieve change. This paper aims to give an overview of current knowledge on what types of interventions are most effective at changing health professionals' clinical practices. Barriers to change are highlighted and the implications for the development of evidence-based dentistry are considered. Further research on organisational, social and personal influences affecting the application of evidence-based practice is necessary.

Factors influencing the selection of panoramic radiography in general dental practice

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors influencing dentists' decisions to take panoramic radiographs and to determine dentists' perceptions of the value of panoramic radiographs in the diagnosis of common dental pathologies.

METHODS

Questionnaire of dentists with access to panoramic radiography equipment in 22 randomly selected Family Health Service Authorities in England and Wales. Dentists were asked to score 17 factors for their influence upon panoramic use, compare the relative diagnostic value of panoramic and intraoral radiographs for diagnosis of common dental pathologies and state their principal reasons for taking panoramic radiographs.

RESULTS

The response rate to the questionnaire was 73.3%. The factors most likely to influence dentists to take a panoramic radiograph were 'planning oral surgery', 'facial trauma', 'periodontal disease', 'heavily restored dentition' and 'patient first attendance'. Dentists' opinions on the diagnostic usefulness of panoramic radiographs were in broad agreement with those in the scientific literature. The main reasons for taking panoramic radiographs were as a 'general screen' and as a 'view for unerupted or impacted teeth'.

CONCLUSIONS

There are areas where dentists' prescription of panoramic radiographs is in disagreement with recent guidelines. Successful implementation of these guidelines would be likely to lead to a substantial reduction in the numbers of panoramic radiographs taken by GDPs.

Underestimation of the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in a clinical epidemiological study

The prevalence of clinically diagnosed approximal caries and inadequate approximal restorations is usually underestimated, when compared with radiographic assessment as a 'gold standard'.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the degree of this underestimation in a clinical epidemiological project.

METHODS

Clinical data (n = 951) of 17- and 23-year-olds were collected by calibrated examiners and bitewing radiographs were taken after obtaining the participant's consent. The radiographic examination of the approximal surfaces on the radiographs of 621 participants was based on criteria derived from the clinical protocol. A second examiner judged 20% of the radiographic material to determine the interobserver agreement, using Cohen's kappa. The agreement proved to be good (kappa = 0.66) for dentine caries diagnosis, and fair (kappa = 0.44) for restoration assessment.

RESULTS

Of the total number of recorded decayed or inadequately restored surfaces only 10.8% and 13.8% respectively were found clinically. Of the total number of clinically sound surfaces, 10.1% had dentine caries on the bitewing radiograph. The percentage of clinically adequate restorations needing replacement was 25.7%.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in this clinical epidemiological study was highly underestimated. At least for these age groups the results contain a serious warning for epidemiologists and general dental practitioners with respect to the outcome of clinical caries diagnosis.

Aspects of panoramic radiography in general dental practice

OBJECTIVES

To gather information on the types of panoramic x-ray equipment used in NHS dental practice and whether dentists satisfy the legal requirements for safety, to determine which practice personnel take panoramic radiographs and to assess the prevalence of the practice of 'routine' panoramic radiography among NHS dentists.

DESIGN

Postal questionnaire survey of general dental practitioners carried out during 1997 in selected FHSAs in England and Wales.

RESULTS

542 dentists returned the questionnaire, a 73.3% response. Panoramic x-ray equipment ranged in age from 27 years old to new, with 42.2% exceeding 10 years in age. The overwhelming majority of GDPs satisfied the requirement for regular maintenance and surveying of equipment. Almost all dentists (95.9%) performed a history and clinical examination prior to panoramic radiography but 42% practised 'routine screening' of new adult patients. A substantial proportion (36.7%) of dentists used unqualified personnel to take panoramic radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

While some aspects of this study give reassurance about the prevalence of good practice, widespread panoramic screening and using unqualified staff to take radiographs causes concern. These findings have implications for educators and for those involved in maintaining clinical standards.